Subcutaneous endometrial deposit: an unusual cause of right iliac fossa pain

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study describes a 35-year-old woman whose right iliac fossa pain and palpable nodule, exacerbated by menses, were diagnosed as a subcutaneous endometrioma via ultrasound, CT, and biopsy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This case report describes a 35-year-old woman with a 7-day worsening and 7-month history of intermittent right iliac fossa pain accompanied by a palpable nodule that enlarged and became tender during menses, with a prior caesarean section 12 months earlier. Imaging using high-frequency ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT identified a ~2 cm subcutaneous anterior abdominal wall nodule superficial to the right rectus abdominus, with a single vascular pedicle on Doppler and minimal surrounding fat stranding; the ultrasound and CT features prompted a broad differential including hematoma, abscess, sebaceous cyst, enlarged lymph node, desmoid tumor, and malignancies. A percutaneous ultrasound-guided biopsy confirmed the nodule as an endometrioma. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reports an unusual presentation of a subcutaneous endometrial deposit causing right iliac fossa pain and diagnosed as an endometrioma.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

A 35-year-old woman presented to hospital with a 7-day history of worsening right iliac fossa pain. The patient reported a 7-month history of intermittent right iliac fossa pain, associated with a palpable nodule in the right iliac fossa. This nodule showed apparent increase in size and tenderness, on palpation, during her menses. Twelve months previously, the patient had undergone a caesarean section. Plain film of the abdomen was unremarkable. Ultrasound examination using a high frequency probe (7.5 MHz) showed a 2 cm nodule in the subcutaneous fat of the anterior abdominal wall superficial to the right rectus abdominus musculature which was hypoechoic relative to adjacent subcutaneous fat and of inhomogenous echotexture with low level internal hyperechoic echoes. Doppler interrogation showed a single vascular pedicle entering the mass at the periphery (Figure 1a). The margins were slightly irregular. There were no ultrasound features of incisional hernia. Computed tomography with intravenous and oral contrast revealed a 2 cm solid, slightly spiculated nodule, located in the subcutaneous fat without involvement of the anterior abdominal wall musculature and parallel to the Pfannensteil incision (Figure 1b). The nodule was hyperdense compared to rectus abdominus musculature following intravenous contrast enhancement, measuring approximately 80 Hounsfield units. There was minimal stranding of the surrounding subcutaneous fat. Differential diagnosis included haematoma, abscess, sebaceous cyst, enlarged lymph node, desmoid tumour, and malignant tumours such as malignant melanoma, or metastatic breast or renal cell carcinoma. Percutaneous biopsy using a 17 gauge coaxial needle system was performed under ultrasound guidance (Figure 2a). Histopathological examination confirmed endometrioma (Figure 2b).

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisendometrioma

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Flank Pain Soft Tissue Neoplasms Adult Diagnosis, Differential Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Flank Pain Humans Soft Tissue Neoplasms Soft Tissue Neoplasms Ultrasonography

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (6)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:14:11.755070+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK