Determining the defining lengths between mature microRNAs/small interfering RNAs and tinyRNAs

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are loaded into Argonaute (AGO) proteins, forming RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISCs). The assembly process establishes the seed, central, 3′ supplementary, and tail regions across the loaded guide, enabling the RISC to recognize and cleave target RNAs. This guide segmentation is caused by anchoring the 3′ end at the AGO PAZ domain, but the minimum guide length required for the conformation remains to be studied because there was no method by which to do so. Using a 3′→5′ exonuclease ISG20, we determined the lengths of AGO-associated miR-20a and let-7a with 3′ ends that no longer reach the PAZ domain. Unexpectedly, miR-20a and let-7a needed different lengths, 19 and 20 nt, respectively, to maintain their RISC conformation. This difference can be explained by the low affinity of the PAZ domain for the adenosine at g19 of let-7a, suggesting that the tail-region sequence slightly alters the minimum guide length. We also present that 17-nt guides are sufficiently short enough to function as tinyRNAs (tyRNAs) whose 3’ ends are not anchored at the PAZ domain. Since tyRNAs do not have the prerequisite anchoring for the standardized guide segmentation, they would recognize targets differently from miRNAs and siRNAs.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0