Contrast analysis for competing hypotheses: A tutorial using the R Package cofad

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

Researchers in psychology traditionally use analysis of variance to examine differences between multiple groups or conditions. A less well-known, but valuable alternative is contrast analysis — a simple statistical method to test directional, theoretically motivated hypotheses that were defined prior to data collection. In this article, we review the core concepts of contrast analysis for testing hypotheses in between-subjects and within-subjects designs. We also outline and demonstrate the largely unknown possibility to directly test two competing contrasts against each other. In the tutorial part of the article, we show how such competing-contrast analyses can be conducted in the free, open-source software R using the package cofad . Because competing-contrast analysis is a straightforward, flexible, highly powered, and hypothesis-driven approach, it is a valuable tool to extend the understanding of cognitive and behavioral processes in psychological research.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0