The Implicit Assumptions of Classic Functional Responses and Their Multi-Species Extensions

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

Functional responses are central to describe consumer-resource interactions. Defined as the per capita average feeding rate of consumers, since Holling’s seminal papers, they have been widely used in ecology. Holling’s central observation was that they often saturate as resource density increases. If the interference between consumers is strong, they also decrease with consumer density. Here we emphasize the stochastic nature of the individual feeding processes and the associated probability distributions of the different behavioral types and show how they control population-averaged feeding rates. We do so by revisiting a classic approach based on the formulation of feeding interactions in terms of individual-based reaction schemes. We highlight the common assumptions underlying the different functional forms and discover a new predator-dependent functional response that should be considered the natural extension of the Holling type II functional response when consumers interference is considered. Our work has clear implications, on the one hand, for both model selection and parameter inference from feeding experiments, and, on the other, for the use of multi-species extensions of these functional responses in population-level food-web dynamic models.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-11T06:40:09.570059+00:00