Mental Health Excuses or Genuine Struggles? Understanding the Balance for Students from Single-Parent Families

Mental Health Excuses or Genuine Struggles? Understanding the Balance for Students from Single-Parent Families | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Systematic Review Mental Health Excuses or Genuine Struggles? Understanding the Balance for Students from Single-Parent Families Sonal Fernandopulle This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8791612/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The academic success and well-being of students from single-parent families have been widely discussed in education and psychology research, with particular emphasis on the impact of mental health struggles on academic performance. This study conducts a systematic review of existing literature to explore whether students from single-parent families experience genuine mental health challenges that affect their academic outcomes or if mental health concerns are sometimes used as an excuse for poor performance. The research synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2024, focusing on key themes such as mental health and academic achievement, socio-economic barriers, parental involvement, and institutional interventions. The findings reveal that students from single-parent households often face heightened levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, which contribute to lower academic engagement and performance. Socio-economic disadvantages further exacerbate these challenges by limiting access to educational resources, increasing financial burdens, and reducing parental supervision. However, some students demonstrate resilience and academic success despite these obstacles, benefiting from strong coping mechanisms, financial aid programs, and institutional support. Additionally, the study highlights the issue of mental health claims being misused in some cases, leading to concerns over academic accountability and the effectiveness of institutional policies in distinguishing genuine struggles from potential academic disengagement. This research has significant implications for educational institutions and policymakers. Schools and universities must balance providing necessary mental health and financial support with ensuring student accountability. Expanding awareness of mental health services, implementing structured parental engagement programs, and strengthening policies that support students from single-parent families can enhance educational equity. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to better understand the long-term impact of family structure on academic success and mental well-being. Educational Psychology Single-parent families mental health academic performance socio-economic factors resilience parental involvement educational policy Figures Figure 1 Highlights • Examines mental health challenges in students from single-parent families and their impact on academic performance. • Analyzes whether students use mental health struggles as a genuine barrier or as an excuse for poor academic outcomes. • Identifies key socio-economic factors affecting students’ well-being and access to educational resources. Introduction Family structures have evolved dramatically over recent decades, and an increasing number of university students now come from single-parent households. This demographic trend, driven by factors such as rising divorce rates, delayed marriage, and nontraditional family formations, has significant implications for the mental health and academic success of students. Although extensive research has been conducted on children in single‐parent families, most studies have focused on early childhood or secondary education. There is, however, a growing need to explore how these dynamics affect higher education students—a gap that this study aims to fill. Recent studies underscore that students from single-parent families are not only exposed to greater socioeconomic challenges but also face unique emotional and psychological pressures that may hinder their academic performance. (Mahmood, et al., 2023 ) have documented a range of issues that students from single‐parent households encounter, including limited financial resources, reduced parental support, and increased exposure to stressors that adversely affect both mental health and learning outcomes. Similarly, (Saiin, et al., 2024 )highlight that single-parent responsibilities extend beyond mere economic constraints; they also impact the physical, intellectual, and spiritual dimensions of children’s development, contributing to disparities in academic engagement and achievement. In the academic realm, several scholars have argued that the absence of a second parental figure can lead to diminished educational outcomes. For instance, research employing multilevel modeling by (Pong, 1997 ) (Pong, 1998 )found that students from single-parent households tend to perform more poorly on standardized tests in reading and mathematics compared to their peers from dual‐parent families. Although these studies largely focus on earlier educational stages, they provide a useful framework for understanding the persistent disadvantages that can carry into higher education. Moreover, (Johnson, 2022 )phenomenological study on the lived experiences of student parents at community colleges offers critical insights into how these students navigate academic and personal challenges. Many such students report feelings of isolation, increased stress, and difficulties in balancing academic responsibilities with familial obligations. A further complexity in this research area involves the debate over whether mental health issues among students from single-parent households are genuine struggles or, in some cases, serve as a convenient explanation for academic underperformance. On one hand, genuine mental health challenges—such as anxiety, depression, and stress—are well-documented among children and adolescents from single‐parent families (Guo, 2024 ) (Xie, 2024 ). These psychological burdens can stem from economic hardship, reduced social support, and the emotional toll of family disruption. On the other hand, there is an ongoing discussion in the literature regarding whether some students might invoke mental health issues as an excuse to justify poor academic performance rather than as a manifestation of severe psychological distress. This dual possibility highlights the need for a nuanced investigation that distinguishes between authentic mental health struggles and cases where such challenges might be overreported or misinterpreted. The present study is designed to address these complexities by exploring several interrelated objectives. First, it seeks to document the specific mental health challenges faced by university students from single-parent households. Recent evidence suggests that these challenges are multifaceted, involving both internalizing symptoms (such as depression and anxiety) and externalizing behaviors that may disrupt academic focus and social integration (Mahmood, et al., 2023 ) (Johnson, 2022 ). Second, the study examines how these mental health issues correlate with academic performance. There is a robust body of literature indicating that mental health challenges can lead to reduced concentration, absenteeism, and lower overall academic achievement (Perera, 2022 ). Third, the study aims to disentangle whether mental health concerns are being used—consciously or subconsciously—as a rationale for academic struggles. This inquiry is critical because it has direct implications for policy and intervention: understanding the genuine needs of these students is a prerequisite for designing effective support programs. To achieve these objectives, the study is guided by several research questions: What are the most prevalent mental health issues experienced by university students from single-parent families? To what extent do these mental health challenges impact their academic performance and overall well-being? Are there identifiable differences in the mental health needs and academic outcomes of students from single-parent households compared to those from dual‐parent households? Can specific factors—such as socioeconomic status, parental involvement, and support systems—explain variations in these outcomes? Preliminary data from over five years of direct engagement with university students indicate that those from single-parent families often report higher levels of stress and anxiety, along with significant challenges in maintaining academic performance. For example, (Johnson, 2022 ) noted that many community college students who are single parents experience an intricate balancing act between childcare and studies, leading to a continuous state of mental and physical exhaustion. This is echoed by findings in the literature that suggest socioeconomic constraints and limited access to family support networks exacerbate mental health issues, thereby undermining academic success (Saiin, et al., 2024 ). In addition, contemporary research by (Domingo, et al., 2024) and (Van Gasse & Mortelmans, 2020 ) contributes valuable insights into the dynamics of mental health in single-parent households. These studies document how economic instability and reduced parental presence can heighten feelings of isolation and stress among students. They also suggest that tailored interventions—such as counseling services that address both academic and mental health needs—can play a crucial role in mitigating these adverse effects. Furthermore, emerging evidence from (Guo, 2024 ) on learning motivation and (Xie, 2024 ) on the psychological impact of parental divorce provides a broader context for understanding the educational and emotional ramifications of single-parent upbringing. These studies underscore that while single-parent status is associated with significant challenges, there are also resilience factors that can be nurtured through targeted support programs. Such findings highlight the importance of not only recognizing the struggles of these students but also leveraging their inherent strengths to foster improved academic outcomes and better mental health. The significance of this research lies in its potential to inform the development of more effective support systems within higher education. By integrating recent empirical findings and advanced analytical techniques, the study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between mental health and academic performance among students from single-parent families. The ultimate goal is to empower educators, counselors, and policymakers with evidence-based recommendations that will enable them to design interventions tailored to the unique needs of these students. Ultimately, this study endeavors to illuminate the intricate interplay between authentic mental health challenges and academic performance among university students from single-parent households. By synthesizing recent research findings (Mahmood, et al., 2023 ) (Saiin, et al., 2024 ) (Guo, 2024 ) (Johnson, 2022 ) and employing rigorous analytical methods, the investigation seeks to unravel the multiple factors—ranging from economic hardships and reduced parental support to elevated stress and anxiety—that contribute to students’ academic outcomes. The insights gained from this research will not only advance the scholarly understanding of how family structure influences mental health and educational attainment but will also inform the development of targeted, evidence‐based interventions. Such recommendations are poised to empower educators, mental health professionals, and policymakers to design support systems that foster both academic excellence and robust well-being, thereby ensuring that students from single‐parent families have the resources they need to fully realize their potential. Literature review Socioeconomic Status and Family Structure Understanding the impact of family structure on academic achievement has long been a priority in educational research. A significant body of literature indicates that children from single-parent households often experience lower academic performance compared to their peers from two‐parent families—a relationship that is strongly influenced by socioeconomic status (SES). This section reviews seminal studies and recent contributions to elucidate how family structure, parenting styles, and socioeconomic factors collectively shape educational outcomes. (Pong, 1997 ) landmark study investigated the relationship between family structure and academic performance in eighth-grade students. His research demonstrated that students from single-parent households scored significantly lower in both mathematics and reading compared to those from two-parent families. Notably, (Pong, 1997 ) argued that these academic deficits were not solely a function of family structure but were also influenced by the overall school context. In schools where a higher proportion of students came from single-parent households, the overall achievement levels were lower, suggesting that both individual and institutional factors contribute to academic performance. Building upon this foundation, (Pong, 1998 ) extended his analysis to tenth-grade students, examining what he termed the “school compositional effect” of single parenthood. His findings revealed that the negative impact of single-parent family status on academic achievement was magnified when a larger percentage of the school’s population came from single-parent households. This work underscores that family structure exerts both direct and contextual effects on educational outcomes, with the school environment playing a critical mediating role. In addition to family structure per se, the manner in which parents interact with their children—the parenting style—can significantly influence academic and psychological outcomes. (Sanvictores & Mendez, 2024) provide a comprehensive overview of different parenting styles, categorizing them into authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and neglectful types. Their analysis suggests that in single-parent households, where resources and time may be more constrained, parenting behaviors often tend toward authoritarian or permissive styles. Such approaches may inadvertently contribute to higher levels of stress and lower academic motivation among children. By contrasting these styles, (Sanvictores & Mendez, 2024) highlight that not all single-parent environments are alike; the specific parenting strategies employed can either exacerbate or mitigate the adverse effects associated with single parenthood. A recurring challenge in this body of research is the measurement and conceptualization of SES. (Antonoplis, 2023 ) critically examines the traditional approaches to studying socioeconomic status, identifying several conceptual problems. He argues that conventional measures, which often focus narrowly on income, fail to capture the multidimensional nature of SES—including education, occupational prestige, and access to social and cultural capital. By proposing an alternative framework, (Antonoplis, 2023 ) urges researchers to adopt a more comprehensive perspective when assessing the interplay between SES and family structure. This perspective is particularly important when considering that the disadvantages linked to single-parent households may be compounded by broader socioeconomic inequalities. (Kearney, 2023 ) recent work, The Two-Parent Privilege: How Americans Stopped Getting Married and Started Falling Behind , provides a broader societal context for understanding the impact of family structure on socioeconomic outcomes. (Kearney, 2023 ) argues that the traditional two-parent family is associated with greater access to resources, social support, and economic stability—a configuration that confers distinct advantages in terms of educational and occupational outcomes. This “privilege” is evident in the comparative performance of students from dual-parent households versus those from single-parent families, suggesting that changes in marriage patterns have significant implications for the distribution of socioeconomic resources and, consequently, academic achievement. While much of the literature emphasizes the challenges associated with single-parent families, (Yan & Gai, 2022 ) offer a more nuanced view by exploring the phenomenon of academic resilience among students from low-SES backgrounds. Their study identifies protective factors—such as supportive school environments, high parental expectations, and community resources—that enable some students to achieve high academic outcomes despite economic disadvantages. (Yan & Gai, 2022 ) demonstrate that the negative effects of low SES and single-parent status are not inevitable; rather, they can be offset by interventions that bolster the resilience of students. This comparative insight is valuable for educators and policymakers seeking to design targeted support programs that promote academic success among disadvantaged populations. Collectively, these studies illustrate a complex interplay between family structure and socioeconomic status. On one hand, (Pong, 1997 ) (Pong, 1998 ) research provides strong empirical evidence that students from single-parent households tend to underperform academically, a trend that is exacerbated by the overall composition of the school environment. On the other hand, the work of (Sanvictores & Mendez, 2024) shows that parenting styles in single-parent homes play a crucial role in mediating these outcomes, while (Antonoplis, 2023 ) challenges researchers to rethink how SES is conceptualized and measured. Moreover, (Kearney, 2023 ) analysis of the “two-parent privilege” contextualizes these findings within broader societal trends, and (Yan & Gai, 2022 ) offer evidence that academic resilience is possible even in the face of socioeconomic adversity. The literature, therefore, suggests that the academic challenges faced by students from single-parent families are not solely a result of the absence of a second parent but are deeply intertwined with broader socioeconomic factors and parenting practices. These insights have profound implications for the design of educational interventions and policies aimed at reducing the achievement gap. Future research should focus on longitudinal analyses that can further disentangle these complex relationships and on intervention studies that test the efficacy of strategies designed to support students from single-parent and low-SES backgrounds. Mental Health Outcomes in Single-Parent Families The mental health outcomes experienced by individuals from single-parent families have emerged as a critical concern in both developmental and educational research. Recent investigations, including preliminary work by (Guo, 2024 ) and (Xie, 2024 ), suggest that children and adolescents growing up in single‐parent households face a heightened risk for internalizing disorders such as anxiety, depression, and chronic stress. These adverse outcomes are often linked to the structural challenges inherent in single‐parent family dynamics, where reduced parental availability, financial constraints, and limited social support contribute to elevated emotional burdens. For instance, the stress associated with single‐parenting may impair effective emotion regulation, resulting in persistent symptoms of depression and anxiety that not only affect overall mental well-being but also hinder academic and social functioning. Complementing these findings, (Kroese, et al., 2020 ) conducted a systematic review examining the association between growing up in single-parent families and the criminal involvement of adolescents. Their analysis revealed that the absence of a second parental figure can lead to less supervision and higher levels of stress, which in turn may predispose adolescents to engage in delinquent behaviors. Although criminal involvement represents an externalizing outcome, it is closely intertwined with mental health; the chronic strain and lack of adequate familial support often manifest in both internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems. This body of work underscores the importance of addressing mental health outcomes holistically, as they encompass not only psychological distress but also behaviors that have broader social implications. At the same time, broader policy contexts play a significant role in shaping mental health outcomes in single-parent families. (Simpson, et al., 2021) systematically reviewed the effects of social security policy reforms in high-income countries and found that changes in public policy—particularly those affecting financial and social support—can either mitigate or exacerbate mental health disparities. For single-parent families, who are disproportionately affected by economic hardship, policies that enhance access to financial resources, healthcare, and social services have the potential to alleviate some of the adverse mental health outcomes. Conversely, reductions in social support mechanisms tend to deepen mental health inequalities, suggesting that policy interventions are crucial in buffering the negative effects associated with single-parent household structures. Within the higher education context, the prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems have been the focus of several systematic reviews. (Sheldon, et al., 2021) conducted a meta-analysis on undergraduate students and found that mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and stress are not only common but also significantly influenced by socioeconomic and familial factors. University students from single-parent families, in particular, appear to be more vulnerable to these mental health challenges. Financial strains, combined with the pressure to balance academic responsibilities with familial obligations, create a “perfect storm” that exacerbates psychological distress. Such findings are further supported by ( Bartolomé-Valenzuela, et al., 2024 ), who demonstrated that patterns of adverse childhood experiences are strongly associated with lower mental well-being among university students. These studies collectively suggest that the cumulative impact of early adverse experiences—often more prevalent in single-parent households—can have enduring effects on mental health that persist into young adulthood and potentially interfere with academic success. Moreover, qualitative research provides additional depth to our understanding of mental health outcomes in these families. For example, (Liebe, et al., 2024) explored mothers’ lived experiences with food insecurity, revealing that the constant stress of not having reliable access to nutritious food has profound mental health implications. The study found that chronic food insecurity not only elevates anxiety and depressive symptoms among mothers but also affects their capacity to provide a stable and supportive environment for their children. This narrative of lived experience enriches the quantitative findings by illustrating the day-to-day realities and coping strategies employed by single-parent families facing significant resource constraints. When considering these diverse strands of research, several key insights emerge. First, the mental health challenges associated with single-parent family structures are multifaceted; they encompass both internalizing issues such as depression and anxiety, and externalizing behaviors that may include criminal involvement. Second, the socioeconomic context is a critical moderator of these outcomes. As Simpson et al.’s systematic review indicates, policy reforms that bolster social security and access to support services can have a significant positive effect on mental health, while reductions in these supports are linked to worse outcomes. Third, higher education presents unique stressors that compound the pre-existing vulnerabilities associated with single-parent backgrounds. The systematic review by Sheldon et al. highlights that university students face distinct pressures—including academic workload and the challenges of transitioning to independent living—that can exacerbate mental health difficulties. Finally, the interplay between adverse childhood experiences and ongoing resource constraints, as detailed by ( Bartolomé-Valenzuela, et al., 2024 )., suggests that the mental health repercussions of single-parenting are both deep-rooted and far-reaching. In synthesizing the current literature, it becomes evident that the mental health outcomes in single-parent families cannot be fully understood without considering the broader socioeconomic and policy contexts, as well as the personal narratives of those directly affected. The research points to a need for interventions that address not only the immediate psychological distress but also the underlying economic and social conditions that contribute to these outcomes. For instance, strategies that improve access to mental health services, enhance parental support, and provide financial assistance could collectively reduce the mental health burden in these families. Furthermore, longitudinal studies are needed to track how early adverse experiences in single-parent households influence long-term mental health trajectories and academic performance, particularly as students progress into higher education. Overall, the literature underscores a complex, interrelated set of factors that contribute to the mental health outcomes observed in single-parent families. The findings from (Guo, 2024 ) and (Xie, 2024 ) provide emerging evidence of the heightened psychological challenges in these settings, while systematic reviews by (Kroese, et al., 2020 ), (Simpson, et al., 2021), and (Sheldon, et al., 2021). reinforce the link between socioeconomic disadvantage, adverse childhood experiences, and mental health. Additionally, qualitative insights from studies such as (Liebe, et al., 2024). offer critical perspectives on the lived realities of these families, emphasizing that the mental health issues encountered are deeply embedded in both structural and personal factors. This comprehensive synthesis of the literature not only highlights the urgency of addressing mental health in single-parent families but also lays the groundwork for developing targeted, multidimensional interventions that can mitigate these challenges and promote better academic and psychological outcomes. Parental Involvement and Support Parental involvement and support are widely recognized as critical factors that shape children’s academic and developmental outcomes. (Johnson, 2022 ) highlights that active parental engagement is associated with improved academic performance and emotional well-being in students, underscoring the significance of parental presence throughout the educational journey. This involvement encompasses a range of activities from homework assistance and school event participation to the provision of emotional support, each contributing uniquely to a child’s learning experience. (Froiland, 2021 ) extends this discussion by proposing a comprehensive model of parent involvement that emphasizes psychological facets. According to (Froiland, 2021 ), parental involvement is not merely about physical presence or participation in school activities; rather, it also involves the quality of the interaction between parents and children. Psychological components—such as parental beliefs, attitudes, and expectations—are instrumental in shaping how parents engage with their child’s education. For instance, parents who exhibit high levels of emotional support and maintain positive expectations can foster a sense of competence and motivation in their children. This supportive behavior, in turn, is linked to better academic and social outcomes across different educational stages. The impact of parenting style on early childhood learning further illustrates the importance of parental involvement. (Kong & Yasmin, 2022 ) study on the impact of parenting style on early childhood learning emphasizes that parenting behaviors have both direct and indirect effects on children’s learning processes. In their research, parental self-efficacy—defined as a parent’s belief in their ability to influence their child’s educational and developmental outcomes—plays a mediating role between parenting style and early learning achievements. This finding suggests that when parents are confident and capable in their roles, they are more likely to engage in effective parenting practices, which then contribute positively to their children’s academic progress. Conversely, lower self-efficacy can lead to less supportive interactions and, ultimately, poorer educational outcomes. Moreover, these studies collectively indicate that the benefits of parental involvement extend beyond academic performance. They contribute to the overall development of social skills, self-esteem, and emotional regulation in children. When parents actively participate in their children’s education, they not only provide practical assistance with schoolwork but also serve as role models of resilience and positive coping strategies. The interplay between parental self-efficacy and parenting style, as identified by (Kong & Yasmin, 2022 ), further reinforces the idea that support at home is multi-dimensional, encompassing both behavioral and psychological components. Taken together, the evidence indicates that parental involvement and support are essential for fostering optimal academic and developmental outcomes in children. (Johnson, 2022 ) underscores the positive associations between active parental engagement and student success, while (Froiland, 2021 ) and (Kong & Yasmin, 2022 ) reveal that the quality of parental interaction—shaped by psychological factors and self-efficacy—is a key determinant of effective involvement. These insights carry significant implications for educators and policymakers, emphasizing the need to develop interventions that strengthen family engagement in education. Interplay Between Mental Health and Academic Performance The interplay between mental health and academic performance is a critical area of inquiry, as emerging evidence suggests a bidirectional relationship where each influences the other. Agnafors, Barmark, and Sydsjö (2021) examined both selection and causation effects from childhood to early adulthood and found that early mental health difficulties can lead to poorer academic outcomes, which in turn may further exacerbate psychological challenges. Their study emphasizes that mental health issues are not merely consequences of academic struggles but can also act as precursors to declining academic performance, underscoring the complex, reciprocal nature of this relationship. Expanding on these findings, Deng et al. ( 2022 ) investigated how family and academic stress jointly impact students’ depression levels and academic performance. Their research demonstrated that stress originating from both familial environments and academic pressures significantly predicts higher depression scores, which are closely associated with lower academic achievement. This dual-stressor model suggests that the negative impact on academic performance may be mitigated if interventions can reduce stress at home and improve students’ coping mechanisms, thereby alleviating depressive symptoms. Moreover, the role of digital media in shaping mental health and academic outcomes is gaining attention. Foroughi et al. (2022) explored the associations between Instagram addiction, social anxiety, depression, and life satisfaction among university students. Their findings indicate that higher levels of social media addiction are linked to increased social anxiety and depression, which in turn impair academic performance. Together, these studies underscore a multifaceted relationship: mental health challenges and academic performance are intertwined and influenced by various factors, including family stress, academic pressure, and digital media use. This complex interplay calls for comprehensive strategies that address both the psychological and contextual factors impacting student success. Theoretical Frameworks and Models In addition to the foundational perspectives discussed earlier, a closer examination of family dynamics through the lens of enmeshed family systems further illuminates the intricate interplay between mental health and academic performance. The study published in the Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Law (Garber, 2021 ) revisits the dynamics of enmeshed family systems, exploring phenomena such as adultification, parentification, and infantilization. These processes occur when children are thrust into roles typically reserved for adults—either by assuming caregiving responsibilities or by being involved in complex family decision-making processes. Such early role reversals can disrupt normal developmental trajectories, leading to long-term emotional distress and, consequently, lower academic achievement. (Priest, 2021 ) comprehensive discussion of Family Systems Theory supports this view, emphasizing that the family operates as an interconnected system where dysfunction in one area inevitably affects the entire unit. (Huang, et al., 2022 ) moderated mediation model, for example, highlights how impaired family functioning can lower self-esteem and strain peer relationships, thereby increasing the risk of adolescent depression. These findings suggest that the adverse effects of dysfunctional family dynamics are not confined solely to psychological outcomes but extend into the academic domain. Moreover, the transactional theory of stress provides additional depth in understanding how students navigate the combined pressures of family and academic life. (Sharma & Gupta, 2023 ) applied a multidimensional transactional approach to explore technostress, cognitive appraisal, and coping strategies, showing that stress is a dynamic process influenced by individual perceptions and responses rather than solely by external demands. This perspective complements the Family Systems Theory by suggesting that even when adverse family dynamics contribute to mental health challenges, the degree to which these challenges impair academic performance can be moderated by effective personal coping mechanisms. In a similar (Deng, et al., 2022) demonstrated that both family and academic stress jointly influence depression levels, which in turn negatively affect academic performance. These models collectively underscore that mental health and academic outcomes result from a complex interplay of structural family dynamics, individual stress appraisals, and external support systems. Together, these theoretical frameworks—Family Systems Theory and the transactional theory of stress—provide a comprehensive model for understanding the interplay between mental health and academic performance. By integrating insights from legal analyses of enmeshed family dynamics (Garber, 2021 )empirical models of family functioning (Huang, et al., 2022 ), and studies on stress appraisal (Sharma & Gupta, 2023 ) (Deng, et al., 2022), we gain a nuanced understanding of how individual, familial, and contextual factors converge to shape both mental health and educational outcomes. This integrated approach not only informs our theoretical understanding but also points to the potential for targeted interventions that address both the emotional and cognitive dimensions of stress, ultimately aiming to improve academic success among students from single-parent families. Intervention Strategies and Policy Implications Intervention strategies and policy implications represent a critical avenue for addressing educational inequalities and supporting student success, particularly among vulnerable populations such as first-generation college students and those facing nonfinancial barriers to college access. (Dynarski, et al., 2023 ) Chap. 5 provide robust evidence on how addressing nonfinancial barriers—such as inadequate academic advising, limited access to mental health services, and insufficient campus support—can significantly enhance college access and success. Their work underscores that policies must extend beyond financial aid, incorporating measures that build comprehensive support systems aimed at fostering both academic persistence and overall well-being. Complementing this perspective, (Amirkhan, et al., 2023 ) explore the phenomenon of stress overload in first-generation college students. Their study reveals that the overwhelming pressures faced by these students—stemming from academic demands, familial responsibilities, and social isolation—can lead to significant psychological distress. Targeted interventions, such as counseling programs tailored to the unique stressors of first-generation students, have demonstrated potential in mitigating these adverse outcomes. By reducing stress and enhancing coping strategies, these interventions not only improve mental health but also contribute to better academic performance, thereby reducing dropout rates. Further expanding the discussion, Carmen Aina and colleagues (Aina, et al., 2022 ) provide a comprehensive review of the socio-economic determinants of university dropout. Their synthesis of the literature highlights that factors such as economic hardship, lack of social capital, and insufficient institutional support play pivotal roles in student attrition. These findings suggest that intervention strategies must be multifaceted—addressing both the immediate academic challenges and the underlying socio-economic barriers that predispose students to dropout. Policy implications drawn from this review advocate for integrated approaches that combine academic support services with broader social and community-based initiatives to create a more inclusive educational environment. In addition, (Easterbrook & Hadden, 2020 ) offer insights from social psychology to tackle educational inequalities by focusing on the role of identities, contexts, and tailored interventions. Their work demonstrates that strategies which acknowledge and incorporate students’ diverse backgrounds—by promoting positive identity formation, fostering supportive peer and mentor relationships, and creating inclusive campus climates—can effectively reduce educational disparities. These social psychology-based interventions work synergistically with policy reforms, helping to reshape institutional practices in ways that address both the structural and psychological dimensions of educational inequities. Collectively, the literature indicates that effective intervention strategies and policy measures must operate on multiple levels. By addressing nonfinancial barriers, mitigating stress overload, and targeting socio-economic determinants of dropout, institutions can create comprehensive support frameworks that promote academic success and mental well-being. Such integrated approaches not only benefit individual students but also contribute to broader efforts in reducing educational inequalities and fostering a more equitable higher education system. Methodological Variations in the Literature The methodological approaches employed in research on mental health and academic performance—especially within socio-economically disadvantaged and single-parent contexts—vary widely, adding both richness and complexity to the literature. For example, ( Bartolomé-Valenzuela, et al., 2024 ) apply advanced quantitative techniques, such as cluster analysis, to identify distinct patterns of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and examine their associations with lower mental well-being among university students. This approach allows for a nuanced understanding of complex, multidimensional constructs. However, it also raises questions about the replicability and generalizability of such patterns across diverse populations, as the clustering solutions are sensitive to sample characteristics and variable selection. In contrast, (Aina, et al., 2022 ) conduct a systematic review focusing on the socio-economic determinants of university dropout. Their review synthesizes findings from a wide range of quantitative studies, providing a comprehensive overview of the socio-economic factors that contribute to educational attrition. Despite offering valuable insights, the review highlights significant methodological heterogeneity—such as differences in sample sizes, measurement tools, and research designs—which complicates direct comparisons and the drawing of definitive conclusions regarding causality. Meanwhile, (Amirkhan, et al., 2023 ) investigate stress overload in first-generation college students using validated psychometric surveys. Their quantitative study measures stress levels and links them to academic performance, providing robust empirical evidence of the detrimental impact of stress on student success. However, the cross-sectional nature of their study limits causal inferences, as the snapshot design cannot capture the dynamic changes in stress and performance over time. Complementing these empirical studies, (Antonoplis, 2023 ) offers a critical, conceptual analysis of socioeconomic status (SES) measurement. He argues that traditional SES metrics—often narrowly focused on income—fail to capture the full spectrum of social and cultural capital. By proposing a more multidimensional framework, Antonoplis challenges researchers to rethink and refine their measurement approaches, an issue that has implications for all subsequent analyses linking SES with mental health and academic outcomes. Lastly, (Deng, et al., 2022) examine the impact of family and academic stress on students’ depression levels and academic performance using mediation analysis. Their quantitative study demonstrates the interconnected nature of these variables, suggesting that family and academic stressors may indirectly influence academic outcomes through their effect on mental health. As with other cross-sectional studies, the reliance on self-report measures and the absence of longitudinal data constrain the ability to establish definitive causal pathways. Together, these methodological variations—from advanced quantitative analyses and systematic reviews to theoretical critiques—underscore the need for careful synthesis of findings. Recognizing the strengths and limitations inherent in each approach is crucial for building a coherent understanding of how mental health, academic performance, and socioeconomic factors interact, particularly within vulnerable populations such as students from single-parent families. Methodology Research Design and Approach This study employed a systematic review methodology to synthesize and critically evaluate the current literature on the interplay between mental health and academic performance among students from single-parent families. A systematic review was chosen due to its rigorous, transparent, and replicable nature, allowing for a comprehensive aggregation of high-quality, peer-reviewed research on this multifaceted topic. Following established protocols and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy was developed. Major academic databases, including PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus, were systematically queried using a combination of keywords and Boolean operators related to "single-parent families," "mental health," "academic performance," and other relevant terms. The search was confined to studies published within a predetermined time frame and in English, ensuring both the currency and accessibility of the literature. Each retrieved study underwent a two-stage screening process—initially through titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review—to ensure relevance and methodological rigor. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were then subjected to data extraction, where key details such as study design, sample characteristics, findings, and theoretical frameworks were systematically recorded. By utilizing this systematic review approach, the study aims to consolidate diverse findings, identify prevailing themes and gaps in the literature, and provide an evidence-based foundation for future research and policy interventions in the context of mental health and academic performance in single-parent families. Data Sources and Search Strategy To ensure a comprehensive and unbiased collection of relevant literature, a multi-database search was conducted. Primary sources included well-established academic databases such as PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus. In addition, supplementary searches were carried out using Google Scholar and select institutional repositories to capture any additional studies not indexed in the major databases. The search strategy was developed using both controlled vocabulary (e.g., MeSH terms) and free-text keywords to encompass the various dimensions of the topic. Key search terms included “single-parent families,” “mental health,” “academic performance,” “university students,” and “socioeconomic status.” Boolean operators (AND, OR) were strategically used to combine these terms, ensuring the retrieval of studies that specifically addressed the intersections of family structure, mental health, and educational outcomes. The literature search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2020 and 2024, ensuring the inclusion of recent and relevant findings. All identified records were imported into reference management software for duplicate removal and efficient screening. A two-step screening process was then implemented—initially reviewing titles and abstracts to filter out irrelevant studies, followed by a full-text assessment to verify that each article met the predetermined inclusion criteria. This systematic approach to data sourcing not only maximizes the breadth of the literature collected but also supports a rigorous and transparent selection process, laying a solid foundation for subsequent synthesis and analysis. Methodological Variation Approach/Technique Focus/Contribution Strengths/Limitations Quantitative Cluster Analysis Utilizes advanced clustering techniques to identify distinct patterns in data Discerns patterns in adverse childhood experiences and their association with mental well-being Offers nuanced insights into subgroups; sensitive to sample characteristics and variable selection Systematic Literature Review Aggregates and synthesizes findings from multiple studies using predefined criteria Provides a comprehensive overview of socio-economic determinants of university dropout and related outcomes Captures broad trends and gaps; heterogeneity in study designs can complicate direct comparisons Cross-Sectional Survey Design Employs validated psychometric instruments to measure constructs such as stress and depression Examines stress overload among first-generation students and its impact on academic performance Delivers robust empirical evidence; limited in establishing causal relationships due to the snapshot design Conceptual Analysis Critically evaluates and proposes alternative frameworks for measuring key constructs (e.g., socioeconomic status) Challenges traditional measurement models by advocating for a multidimensional view beyond income alone Provides valuable theoretical insights; empirical validation may be needed for new frameworks Mediation Analysis Uses quantitative modeling to explore indirect relationships between variables Investigates how family and academic stressors influence depression and academic outcomes through mediating factors Clarifies complex interrelationships; relies on self-reported data and may be constrained by cross-sectional data Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria In conducting a systematic review, it's essential to establish clear inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure the selection of relevant and high-quality studies. These criteria help define the scope of the review and ensure consistency in study selection. The table below summarizes the inclusion and exclusion criteria applied in this research: Criterion Inclusion Exclusion Publication Type - Peer-reviewed journal articles - Non-peer-reviewed articles - Systematic reviews - Opinion pieces - Meta-analyses - Editorials - High-quality conceptual analyses - Studies lacking robust empirical or conceptual evidence Language - Studies published in English - Articles published in languages other than English Publication Date - Studies published between 2020 and 2024 - Publications outside the specified date range (unless deemed seminal and essential for contextual understanding) - Seminal works outside this range considered if essential for historical context Focus/Topic - Research addressing mental health outcomes, academic performance, family structure, socio-economic factors, or parental involvement - Studies not directly related to the specified topics (e.g., focusing solely on unrelated medical or non-educational issues) Population - Research focusing on adolescents and university students - Studies targeting populations outside the educational context or age groups not relevant to the review's focus Methodological Quality - Studies employing robust quantitative, qualitative, or conceptual methodologies - Studies with limited methodological rigor - Studies providing meaningful insights into the research questions - Studies that do not contribute to a broader understanding of the subject matter Study Selection Process In conducting a systematic review on the mental health outcomes, academic performance, socio-economic factors, and parental involvement in single-parent families among adolescents and university students, it's essential to follow a structured study selection process. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework provides a standardized method to ensure transparency and reproducibility in systematic reviews. Data Extraction and Coding In systematic reviews, data extraction involves systematically collecting pertinent information from selected studies to facilitate analysis and synthesis. This process ensures that data is consistently and accurately gathered, enabling a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence. Coding , on the other hand, entails categorizing this extracted data into predefined themes or variables, allowing for structured analysis and identification of patterns across studies. Study Authors Year Population Study Design Key Findings Limitations Patterns of adverse childhood experiences and associations with lower mental well-being among university students Bartolomé-Valenzuela, M., Pereda, N., & Guilera, G. 2024 University students Cross-sectional Identified specific ACEs linked to reduced mental well-being Self-reported data may introduce bias The determinants of university dropout: A review of the socio-economic literature Aina, C., Baici, E., Casalone, G., & Pastore, F. 2022 University students Literature review Highlighted key socio-economic factors contributing to university dropout rates Limited by the scope of reviewed studies Stress overload in first-generation college students: Implications for intervention Amirkhan, J. H., Manalo Jr, R., & Velasco, S. E. 2023 First-generation college students Survey-based Found high levels of stress overload impacting academic performance Cross-sectional design limits causal inference Studying Socioeconomic Status: Conceptual Problems and an Alternative Path Forward Antonoplis, S. 2023 General population Theoretical analysis Discussed challenges in measuring socioeconomic status and proposed alternative approaches Lacks empirical data Family and Academic Stress and Their Impact on Students' Depression Level and Academic Performance Deng, Y., et al. 2022 High school students Longitudinal study Demonstrated that both family and academic stress contribute to increased depression and lower academic performance Generalizability may be limited to similar populations When Two Become One: The Experiences of Students in a Single-Parent Household Domingo, H., et al. 2024 Students from single-parent households Qualitative study Explored unique challenges faced by students in single-parent households affecting their academic performance Small sample size may limit generalizability Addressing nonfinancial barriers to college access and success: Evidence and policy implications Dynarski, S., Nurshatayeva, A., Page, L. C., & Scott-Clayton, J. 2023 Prospective college students Policy analysis Identified nonfinancial barriers such as information gaps and procedural complexities hindering college access and success Policy recommendations may require contextual adaptation Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions Easterbrook, M. J., & Hadden, I. R. 2020 Diverse student populations Review article Analyzed how social identities and contexts contribute to educational inequalities and discussed interventions Broad scope may limit depth in specific areas A comprehensive model of preschool through high school parent involvement with emphasis on the psychological facets Froiland, J. M. 2021 School-aged children and parents Theoretical model Proposed a model emphasizing psychological aspects of parental involvement influencing student outcomes Model requires empirical validation The Dynamics of the Enmeshed Family System Ten Years Later: Family Court and Contemporary Understanding of Adultification, Parentification, and Infantilization Garber, B. D. 2021 Families in family court settings Review article Examined dynamics of enmeshed family systems and their impact on child development Focused on family court cases, which may limit generalizability A study on the learning motivation deviation of children in single-parent families Guo, X. 2024 Children from single-parent families Quantitative study Found deviations in learning motivation among children from single-parent families compared to two-parent families Cultural factors may influence findings Family functioning and adolescent depression: A moderated mediation model of self-esteem and peer relationships Huang, X., Hu, N., Yao, Z., & Peng, B. 2022 Adolescents Quantitative study Identified that self-esteem and peer relationships mediate the relationship between family functioning and adolescent depression Cross-sectional design limits causal conclusions The Lived Experiences of Students Who are Single Parents and Attending Community College: A Phenomenological Study Johnson, D. 2022 Single-parent students Qualitative study Explored challenges faced by single-parent students in community colleges, including time management and financial strain Findings may not generalize to four-year institutions The Two-Parent Privilege: How the decline in marriage has increased inequality and lowered social mobility, and what we can do about it Kearney, M. S. 2023 General population Policy analysis Discussed how the decline in two-parent households contributes to social inequality and proposed policy interventions Policy recommendations may be subject to debate Impact of Parenting Style on Early Childhood Learning: Mediating Role of Parental Self-Efficacy Kong, C., & Yasmin, F. 2022 Early childhood students and parents Quantitative study Found that parental self-efficacy mediates the relationship between parenting style and early childhood learning outcomes Study limited to early childhood, may not apply to older students Growing up in single-parent families and the criminal involvement of adolescents: a systematic review Kroese, J., Bernasco, W., Liefbroer, A. C., & Rouwendal, J. 2020 Adolescents from single-parent families Systematic review Identified an association between growing up in single-parent families and increased risk of criminal involvement Causality cannot be inferred from reviewed studies “I’m Doing the Best that I Can”: Mothers Lived Experience with Food Insecurity, Coping Strategies, and Mental Health Implications Liebe, R. A., et al. 2024 Mothers experiencing food insecurity Qualitative study Explored coping strategies and mental health implications for mothers facing food insecurity Small sample size may limit generalizability Students from single-parent households: their issues & challenges Mahmood, S., Rohaniah, S., & Sangeetha, N. 2023 Students from single-parent households Review article Discussed various challenges faced by students from single-parent households, including financial and emotional issues Lacks empirical data Issues and Challenges that Students from Single-Parent Households Face in Their Academic Performance at Senior Secondary Level Perera, L. I. S. 2022 Senior secondary students from single-parent households Quantitative study Identified specific academic challenges faced by students from single-parent households at the senior secondary level Study limited to a specific ed Family Structure, School Context, and Eighth-Grade Math and Reading Achievement Pong, S. L. 1997 Eighth-grade students in the U.S. Quantitative analysis using National Education Longitudinal Study data Schools with higher proportions of students from single-parent families negatively affect individual student achievement in math and reading. Strong social relations among parents can mitigate these negative effects. Cross-sectional design limits causal inferences; potential unmeasured confounding variables. The School Compositional Effect of Single Parenthood on 10th-Grade Achievement Pong, S. L. 1998 Tenth-grade students in the U.S. Quantitative analysis using National Education Longitudinal Study data Attending schools with a high concentration of children from single-parent homes is associated with lower math and reading achievement, even after controlling for individual demographics and family background. Cross-sectional design; potential for residual confounding. The Science of Family Systems Theory Priest, J. B. 2021 Not specified Theoretical analysis Provides a comprehensive overview of family systems theory, emphasizing the interconnectedness of family members and the impact of family dynamics on individual behavior. Theoretical work; lacks empirical data. Single Parent Responsibilities and Efforts to Children Education: Analysis of Physical, Intellectual and Spiritual Saiin, A., Ghafurjonovich, V. G., & Amsalu, A. 2024 Single parents and their children Qualitative analysis Explores the multifaceted responsibilities of single parents in supporting their children's education, highlighting challenges in physical, intellectual, and spiritual domains. Qualitative design limits generalizability; potential for subjective bias. Types of Parenting Styles and Effects on Children Sanvictores, T., & Mendez, M. D. 2024 Not specified Literature review Reviews various parenting styles (authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, uninvolved) and their associated effects on child development, noting that authoritative parenting is generally linked to positive outcomes. Relies on existing literature; may not capture recent studies. Investigating the Role of Technostress, Cognitive Appraisal, and Coping Strategies on Students' Learning Performance in Higher Education: A Multidimensional Transactional Theory of Stress Approach Sharma, S., & Gupta, B. 2023 University students Quantitative study Finds that technostress negatively impacts learning performance, but effective coping strategies and positive cognitive appraisal can mitigate these effects. Self-reported data may introduce bias; cross-sectional design limits causal conclusions. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Mental Health Problems in University Undergraduate Students: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Sheldon, E., et al. 2021 University undergraduate students Systematic review and meta-analysis Identifies a high prevalence of mental health issues among undergraduates, with key risk factors including academic pressure, financial stress, and lack of social support. Potential publication bias; variability in study methodologies. Effects of Social Security Policy Reforms on Mental Health and Inequalities: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies in High-Income Countries Simpson, J., et al. 2021 Populations in high-income countries Systematic review Finds that certain social security policy reforms are associated with mental health outcomes, with effects varying based on policy design and implementation. Observational studies limit causal inferences; heterogeneity in policy contexts. Social Support in the Process of Household Reorganization After Divorce Van Gasse, D., & Mortelmans, D. 2020 Divorced individuals Qualitative study Highlights the crucial role of social support in adjusting to household changes post-divorce, affecting both practical and emotional well-being. Qualitative design; findings may not be generalizable. The Effect of Parental Divorce on Child Depression Xie, N. 2024 Children of divorced parents Quantitative study Indicates that parental divorce is associated with increased risk of depression in children, with factors such as parental conflict and economic hardship mediating this relationship. Potential for unmeasured confounding; reliance on self-reported measures. High Achievers from Low Family Socioeconomic Status Families: Protective Factors for Academically Resilient Students Yan, Y., & Gai, X. 2022 Academically resilient students from low-SES families Mixed-methods study Identifies protective factors such as strong parental support, intrinsic motivation, and positive school environments that contribute to academic resilience. Mixed-methods design; potential for selection bias. Quality Assessment To ensure the reliability and validity of the findings in this systematic review, a structured quality assessment was conducted. This process aimed to evaluate the methodological rigor, risk of bias, and overall credibility of the included studies. Given the diverse range of research designs—quantitative, qualitative, and systematic reviews—a combination of established quality assessment tools was used. Assessment Criteria The quality of each study was evaluated based on the following key criteria: Relevance to Research Questions – Studies were assessed for their direct contribution to the themes of mental health, academic performance, and socio-economic factors in single-parent families. Study Design and Methodology – The methodological strength of each study was reviewed, considering factors such as sample size, study setting, and research approach. Data Collection and Analysis – The validity and reliability of the data collection methods, statistical analyses, and interpretation of findings were evaluated. Risk of Bias – Potential biases, including selection bias, reporting bias, and confounding factors, were identified. Generalizability – The extent to which study findings could be applied to broader populations was considered. Assessment Criteria High-Quality Studies Moderate-Quality Studies Lower-Quality Studies Relevance to Research Questions Directly addresses mental health, academic performance, and socio-economic factors in single-parent families Provides useful theoretical or contextual insights but lacks empirical data Marginal relevance, does not fully align with core research themes Study Design and Methodology Uses robust quantitative analysis, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses with large sample sizes Employs qualitative methods or theoretical frameworks with limited empirical support Weak study design, unclear methodology, small or non-representative sample Data Collection and Analysis Uses validated tools, standardized data collection, and advanced statistical analysis Relies on self-reported data or non-standardized measures Poor data collection methods, lack of validation, or unclear analysis Risk of Bias Low risk; well-controlled for confounding variables and potential biases Some risk due to self-reported measures or subjective interpretation High risk of selection, response, or reporting bias Generalizability Findings applicable to broader populations due to large, diverse samples Limited generalizability due to small or specialized samples Not generalizable due to case-specific or anecdotal nature Strength of Evidence Contribution Strong empirical foundation, provides clear and replicable insights Contributes to theoretical discussions but lacks empirical validation Weak contribution to the evidence base, lacks replicability Data Synthesis and Analysis To integrate and compare findings from the selected literature, this study employed a narrative synthesis combined with elements of thematic analysis . Given the diverse range of research designs—including quantitative, qualitative, and theoretical studies—this approach allowed for a structured yet flexible method of analyzing and interpreting the existing evidence. Narrative Synthesis Approach A narrative synthesis was used to systematically summarize and interpret findings across studies. This method is particularly effective for synthesizing heterogeneous research, where direct statistical meta-analysis is not feasible due to variations in study design, population, and measurement tools. The synthesis process followed these key steps: 1. Organizing Studies by Key Themes Studies were categorized based on their primary focus, such as mental health outcomes, academic performance, socio-economic factors, parental involvement, and intervention strategies. This categorization allowed for a structured comparison of findings across different research areas. 2. Comparing and Contrasting Findings Patterns, consistencies, and discrepancies across studies were identified. Attention was given to variations in research methodologies and sample characteristics to understand potential reasons for differences in findings. 3. Identifying Gaps in the Literature Studies were assessed for limitations in scope, methodology, and generalizability. Unexplored or under-researched areas were highlighted to inform future research directions. Thematic Analysis To further refine the synthesis, a thematic analysis approach was applied. This involved: 1. Coding Key Themes Recurring patterns and concepts in the literature were identified and coded into thematic categories. For example, studies on mental health and academic performance were coded for common stressors, coping mechanisms, and intervention strategies. 2. Developing Conceptual Linkages Thematic connections between different studies were established, allowing for a broader understanding of how various factors interact. For example, studies on socio-economic status were linked to findings on educational inequalities and mental health disparities. Justification for the Chosen Methods A meta-analysis was not conducted due to the methodological diversity of the included studies, variations in measurement tools, and inconsistencies in reporting statistical data. Instead, a narrative synthesis and thematic analysis were chosen to provide a comprehensive and integrative review of the existing literature, capturing both empirical findings and theoretical perspectives. By using this approach, the study effectively synthesizes existing knowledge while identifying key insights, trends, and gaps, contributing to a deeper understanding of the relationship between mental health, academic performance, and socio-economic factors in single-parent families. Limitations and Ethical Considerations This study has certain limitations that must be acknowledged. The research was limited to peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2020 and 2024, which may have excluded relevant non-English or older studies that could provide additional insights. Differences in research methodologies, sample populations, and data collection techniques among the included studies created challenges in making direct comparisons. Additionally, publication bias may have influenced the findings, as studies with significant results are more likely to be published, potentially underrepresenting studies with null or negative outcomes. Since this study relies entirely on secondary data, there was no control over the quality, accuracy, or potential biases present in the original research. Ethical considerations were carefully addressed throughout the study. Only ethically conducted and peer-reviewed research was included to ensure credibility and reliability. All sources were properly cited to maintain academic integrity and avoid plagiarism. Transparency was maintained by clearly documenting the search strategy, selection criteria, and methodology, ensuring that the review remains replicable and accessible for future researchers. Discussion This study explores the impact of mental health challenges on academic performance among students from single-parent families, examining whether these struggles are genuine or sometimes used as an excuse for poor academic outcomes. The findings highlight the complex relationship between socio-economic conditions, parental involvement, and institutional support, showing that while some students exhibit resilience and perform well academically despite adversity, others face significant obstacles. This chapter critically interprets the findings in light of the research questions, discussing both positive and negative aspects and considering broader implications for policy, practice, and future research. Mental Health and Academic Performance The relationship between mental health and academic performance is well-documented, with numerous studies indicating that students from single-parent families experience higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, all of which negatively impact their ability to succeed in school ( Bartolomé-Valenzuela, et al., 2024 ). The absence of financial and emotional stability in many single-parent households can lead to a lack of focus, reduced motivation, and overall academic disengagement. These challenges are further compounded when students do not have access to mental health support, resulting in decreased academic performance (Xie, 2024 ). However, while mental health issues genuinely affect many students, there is also evidence suggesting that some students may use mental health struggles as an excuse for academic failure. This does not mean that their challenges are not real, but rather that the growing awareness and normalization of mental health issues have created a space where students may rely on these struggles to justify poor performance rather than seeking constructive solutions. In some cases, students might claim anxiety, depression, or stress as reasons for failing exams or missing assignments, despite having had adequate preparation time. While mental health conditions are serious and deserve attention, the misuse of mental health claims can diminish the legitimacy of those who truly need support (Deng, et al., 2022). Another important aspect to consider is how institutional policies respond to mental health claims. Some universities and schools have implemented lenient academic policies, such as deadline extensions and reduced coursework, for students citing mental health issues. While these policies are intended to support struggling students, they can also be misused by those seeking to avoid academic responsibility. The challenge, therefore, lies in distinguishing genuine struggles from cases where students may exploit the system. Future research should explore how institutions can create balanced policies that provide necessary support without encouraging academic complacency. Socioeconomic Factors and Educational Barriers Economic instability is one of the most significant challenges faced by students from single-parent families. Studies show that financial hardships often force students to balance part-time jobs with academic responsibilities, leading to increased stress and reduced study time (Pong, 1997 ). These financial burdens also limit access to essential academic resources, such as tutoring, technology, and extracurricular activities, putting students at a disadvantage compared to their peers from two-parent households (Kearney, 2023 ). However, some students overcome financial difficulties through resilience, determination, and institutional support. Many universities offer scholarships, financial aid programs, and academic mentoring to help economically disadvantaged students succeed (Aina, et al., 2022 ). Some students from single-parent families even outperform their peers due to their strong sense of responsibility and motivation to break free from financial hardship. This suggests that while socio-economic barriers present real challenges, they do not always determine a student’s academic success. At the same time, financial struggles can also be used as an excuse for poor performance. Some students attribute their academic failures to financial constraints when, in reality, the issue may stem from poor time management, lack of motivation, or inadequate study habits. While financial difficulties certainly impact education, many successful students have found ways to overcome these challenges through scholarships, student loans, and work-study programs. This highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of how financial barriers interact with personal accountability in academic success. Parental Involvement and Support Parental support plays a crucial role in a student’s academic performance. Studies suggest that engaged and supportive single parents positively influence their children’s educational outcomes by fostering discipline, motivation, and strong study habits (Sanvictores & Mendez, 2024). When single parents maintain open communication with teachers, set academic expectations, and provide emotional support, their children tend to perform better in school (Froiland, 2021 ). However, many single parents struggle to balance work responsibilities with active participation in their children’s education. Due to time constraints, they may be unable to assist with homework, attend parent-teacher meetings, or provide the same level of supervision as two-parent households (Saiin, et al., 2024 ). This lack of involvement can lead to students feeling unsupported and disengaged from their studies, increasing the likelihood of academic failure (Priest, 2021 ). In some cases, students from single-parent families may use the absence of parental supervision as an excuse for poor academic performance. They may claim that their parent’s workload prevents them from completing assignments or preparing for exams, despite having the same study resources as their peers. While this may be true for some, it is also important to recognize that many students in similar situations manage to excel academically. This raises the question of whether self-discipline and personal responsibility play a greater role in academic success than parental involvement alone. The Role of Student Accountability in Academic Performance One of the key debates in the discussion of academic struggles is the role of personal accountability. While it is undeniable that mental health issues, financial hardships, and lack of parental support create obstacles, students must also take responsibility for their academic success. Studies show that students who actively seek help, manage their time effectively, and adopt problem-solving skills are more likely to succeed, regardless of their background (Guo, 2024 ). Conversely, students who rely too heavily on external factors to explain their academic failures may struggle to develop resilience and self-discipline. This is not to dismiss genuine struggles but to highlight the importance of balancing external challenges with personal responsibility. Educational institutions should encourage students to develop proactive coping mechanisms rather than fostering a culture where struggles are seen solely as barriers rather than challenges to overcome. Intervention Strategies and Policy Implications Many intervention programs have been implemented to support students from single-parent families, with varying degrees of success. Some universities offer counseling services, mentorship programs, and financial aid, which have been shown to improve academic outcomes (Dynarski, et al., 2023 ). Schools that integrate mental health education and academic support systems create environments where students feel supported and empowered to succeed (Easterbrook & Hadden, 2020 ). However, not all intervention strategies are effective. Many students are unaware of the resources available to them, and even when they are, they may not actively seek help due to stigma or lack of motivation (Liebe, et al., 2024). Additionally, some policies focus too much on accommodating struggling students rather than empowering them to overcome challenges. Future policies should strike a balance between offering necessary support and encouraging self-reliance. Limitations of the Existing Literature and Future Research Directions Despite the extensive research on this topic, there are several gaps in the literature. Many studies rely on self-reported data, which may not accurately reflect the extent of students' struggles or their ability to manage academic responsibilities (Deng, et al., 2022). Additionally, cross-sectional research designs limit our ability to determine causality between mental health issues and academic performance. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies that track students over time to better understand the long-term effects of single-parent family structures on education. Furthermore, most studies focus on Western contexts, with limited research on students from low-income or culturally diverse backgrounds. Expanding research to include different socio-economic and cultural settings would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue. The discussion of mental health and academic performance among students from single-parent families is multifaceted, with both challenges and opportunities. While financial strain, lack of parental involvement, and mental health struggles pose significant barriers, resilience, institutional support, and personal accountability play a crucial role in determining academic success. It is essential to address these issues through policy reforms, targeted interventions, and further research to create a more equitable and supportive educational environment. Ultimately, students must be encouraged to take responsibility for their academic success while also receiving the necessary support to navigate challenges effectively. Conclusion This study explores the complex relationship between mental health, academic performance, and socio-economic conditions among students from single-parent families. By systematically reviewing existing literature, the research highlights both the genuine struggles faced by these students and the potential misuse of mental health claims as an excuse for academic challenges. The findings indicate that students from single-parent households often experience higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, which negatively impact their academic engagement and performance. Additionally, financial instability and limited parental involvement further contribute to educational disparities. However, the research also reveals that many students exhibit resilience, overcoming these obstacles through institutional support, personal motivation, and coping mechanisms. While mental health challenges are a significant barrier to academic success, the discussion also raises concerns about students misusing mental health claims to justify academic failure. This underscores the need for balanced institutional policies that provide necessary support while ensuring academic accountability. Schools and universities must implement targeted interventions, such as mental health counseling, flexible academic accommodations, and financial aid programs, to assist students genuinely struggling with mental health issues. At the same time, educational institutions must establish clear guidelines to prevent the misuse of these support systems. The broader implications of this research extend to policymakers and educators who must develop comprehensive strategies to bridge the educational gap for students from single-parent families. Financial aid programs, stronger parental engagement initiatives, and school-based mental health resources can play a crucial role in promoting both equity and accountability in education. Despite the valuable insights gained, this study also acknowledges the limitations of the existing literature, particularly the reliance on self-reported data, cross-sectional designs, and Western-centric research perspectives. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies that track students over time to better understand the long-term effects of single-parent family structures on academic and psychological well-being. Additionally, expanding research to diverse socio-economic and cultural contexts will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced by students from single-parent households globally. In conclusion, this study reinforces the importance of institutional, parental, and policy-driven support for students navigating the dual pressures of mental health struggles and academic performance. Addressing these challenges through evidence-based interventions and further research is essential in creating an inclusive, supportive, and accountable educational system for all students, regardless of their family structure. References Bartolomé-Valenzuela M, Pereda N, Guilera G (2024) Patterns of adverse childhood experiences and associations with lower mental well-being among university students. Child Abuse Negl Issue. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106770 Aina C, Baici E, Casalone G, Pastore F (2022) The determinants of university dropout: A review of the socio-economic literature. Socio-Economic Plann Sci, 79 Amirkhan JH, Manalo Jr R, Velasco SE (2023) Stress overload in first-generation college students: Implications for intervention. Psychol Serv 20(3):636–646 Antonoplis S (2023) Studying Socioeconomic Status: Conceptual Problems and an Alternative Path Forward. Perspect Psychol Sci 18(2):275–292 Deng Y et al (2022) Family and Academic Stress and Their Impact on Students' Depression Level and Academic Performance. Sec Public Mental Health 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.869337) Domingo H et al (2024) When Two Become One: The Experiences of Students in a Single-Parent Household. Psychol EDUCATION: MULTIDISCIPLINARY J 24(1):1–12 Dynarski S, Nurshatayeva A, Page LC, Scott-Clayton J (2023) Chapter 5 - Addressing nonfinancial barriers to college access and success: Evidence and policy implications. Handb Econ Educ 6:319–403 Easterbrook MJ, Hadden IR (2020) Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions. Social Issues Policy Rev 15(1):180–236 Froiland JM (2021) A comprehensive model of preschool through high school parent involvement with emphasis on the psychological facets. School Psychol Int 42(2):103–131 Garber BD (2021) The Dynamics of the Enmeshed Family System Ten Years Later: Family Court and Contemporary Understanding of Adultification, Parentification, and Infantilization. J Am Acad Matrimonial Lawyers, 34(1) Guo X (2024) A study on the learning motivation deviation of children in single-parent families. Applied Educational Psychology 5:152–158 Huang X, Hu N, Yao Z, Peng B (2022) Family functioning and adolescent depression: A moderated mediation model of self-esteem and peer relationships. Sec Educational Psychol, 13 Johnson D (2022) The Lived Experiences of Students Who are Single Parents and Attending Community College: A Phenomenological Study. Electronic Theses and Dissertations , Issue https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/4137 Kearney MS (2023) The Two-Parent Privilege: How the decline in marriage has increased inequality and lowered social mobility, and what we can do about it . Swift, s.l. Kong C, Yasmin F (2022) Impact of Parenting Style on Early Childhood Learning: Mediating Role of Parental Self-Efficacy. Sec Dev Psychol 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928629) Kroese J, Bernasco W, Liefbroer AC, Rouwendal J (2020) Growing up in single-parent families and the criminal involvement of adolescents: a systematic review. Psychology Crime Law 27(1):61–75 Liebe RA et al (2024) I’m Doing the Best that I Can: Mothers Lived Experience with Food Insecurity, Coping Strategies, and Mental Health Implications. Curr Developments Nutr, 8(4) Mahmood S, Rohaniah S, Sangeetha N (2023) Students from single-parent households: their issues & challenges. Asian Social Work Journal ( 8(4):1–1 Perera LIS (2022) Issues and Challenges that Students from Single-Parent Households Face in Their Academic Performance at Senior Secondary Level. SLIIT J Humanit Sci 2(1):60–75 Pong SL (1997) Family Structure, School Context, and Eighth-Grade Math and Reading Achievement. J Marriage Family 59(3):734–746 Pong SP (1998) The School Compositional Effect of Single Parenthood on 10th-Grade Achievement. Sociol Educ 71(1):23–42 Priest JB (2021) The Science of Family Systems Theory. 1 ed. s.l.:Routledge Saiin A, Ghafurjonovich VG, Amsalu A (2024) Single Parent Responsibilities and Efforts to Children Education: Analysis of Physical, Intellectual and Spiritual. Multicultural Islamic Educ Rev 2(2):85–96 Sanvictores T, Mendez MD (2024) Types of Parenting Styles and Effects on Children. StatPearls Publishing Sharma S, Gupta B (2023) Investigating the role of technostress, cognitive appraisal and coping strategies on students' learning performance in higher education: a multidimensional transactional theory of stress approach. Information Technology People; West Linn 36(2):626–660 Sheldon E et al (2021) Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Epub 2021. Simpson J et al (2021) Effects of social security policy reforms on mental health and inequalities: A systematic review of observational studies in high-income countries. Soc Sci Med Van Gasse D, Mortelmans D (2020) Social support in the process of household reorganization after divorce. J Social Personal Relationships, 37(6) Xie N (2024) The Effect of Parental Divorce on Child Depression. J Educ Humanit Social Sci 26:602–607 Yan Y, Gai X (2022) High Achievers from Low Family Socioeconomic Status Families: Protective Factors for Academically Resilient Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(23) Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8791612","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Systematic Review","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":586044881,"identity":"bd192370-fcbd-4f61-b226-cff1d8f400c2","order_by":0,"name":"Sonal Fernandopulle","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0754-5818","institution":"Oxford College of Business, Sri Lanka","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sonal","middleName":"","lastName":"Fernandopulle","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-02-05 03:17:51","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8791612/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8791612/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":102212929,"identity":"0ff88bb0-a21e-4383-ace4-1ce27c0f51dd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-09 12:37:36","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":32068,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eLegend not included with this version.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8791612/v1/01b5b02f8590c7439d83b3fd.png"},{"id":102298573,"identity":"0c4dda85-7558-43da-a11e-59637570b7ba","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-02-10 10:48:28","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1349434,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8791612/v1/111fc086-ce8d-4753-af89-5c3a3cf118fc.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eMental Health Excuses or Genuine Struggles? Understanding the Balance for Students from Single-Parent Families\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Highlights","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Examines mental health challenges in students from single-parent families and their impact on academic performance.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Analyzes whether students use mental health struggles as a genuine barrier or as an excuse for poor academic outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Identifies key socio-economic factors affecting students\u0026rsquo; well-being and access to educational resources.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eFamily structures have evolved dramatically over recent decades, and an increasing number of university students now come from single-parent households. This demographic trend, driven by factors such as rising divorce rates, delayed marriage, and nontraditional family formations, has significant implications for the mental health and academic success of students. Although extensive research has been conducted on children in single‐parent families, most studies have focused on early childhood or secondary education. There is, however, a growing need to explore how these dynamics affect higher education students\u0026mdash;a gap that this study aims to fill.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent studies underscore that students from single-parent families are not only exposed to greater socioeconomic challenges but also face unique emotional and psychological pressures that may hinder their academic performance. (Mahmood, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) have documented a range of issues that students from single‐parent households encounter, including limited financial resources, reduced parental support, and increased exposure to stressors that adversely affect both mental health and learning outcomes. Similarly, (Saiin, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e)highlight that single-parent responsibilities extend beyond mere economic constraints; they also impact the physical, intellectual, and spiritual dimensions of children\u0026rsquo;s development, contributing to disparities in academic engagement and achievement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the academic realm, several scholars have argued that the absence of a second parental figure can lead to diminished educational outcomes. For instance, research employing multilevel modeling by (Pong, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e) (Pong, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e)found that students from single-parent households tend to perform more poorly on standardized tests in reading and mathematics compared to their peers from dual‐parent families. Although these studies largely focus on earlier educational stages, they provide a useful framework for understanding the persistent disadvantages that can carry into higher education. Moreover, (Johnson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e)phenomenological study on the lived experiences of student parents at community colleges offers critical insights into how these students navigate academic and personal challenges. Many such students report feelings of isolation, increased stress, and difficulties in balancing academic responsibilities with familial obligations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA further complexity in this research area involves the debate over whether mental health issues among students from single-parent households are genuine struggles or, in some cases, serve as a convenient explanation for academic underperformance. On one hand, genuine mental health challenges\u0026mdash;such as anxiety, depression, and stress\u0026mdash;are well-documented among children and adolescents from single‐parent families (Guo, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) (Xie, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). These psychological burdens can stem from economic hardship, reduced social support, and the emotional toll of family disruption. On the other hand, there is an ongoing discussion in the literature regarding whether some students might invoke mental health issues as an excuse to justify poor academic performance rather than as a manifestation of severe psychological distress. This dual possibility highlights the need for a nuanced investigation that distinguishes between authentic mental health struggles and cases where such challenges might be overreported or misinterpreted.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe present study is designed to address these complexities by exploring several interrelated objectives. First, it seeks to document the specific mental health challenges faced by university students from single-parent households. Recent evidence suggests that these challenges are multifaceted, involving both internalizing symptoms (such as depression and anxiety) and externalizing behaviors that may disrupt academic focus and social integration (Mahmood, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) (Johnson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Second, the study examines how these mental health issues correlate with academic performance. There is a robust body of literature indicating that mental health challenges can lead to reduced concentration, absenteeism, and lower overall academic achievement (Perera, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Third, the study aims to disentangle whether mental health concerns are being used\u0026mdash;consciously or subconsciously\u0026mdash;as a rationale for academic struggles. This inquiry is critical because it has direct implications for policy and intervention: understanding the genuine needs of these students is a prerequisite for designing effective support programs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo achieve these objectives, the study is guided by several research questions:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat are the most prevalent mental health issues experienced by university students from single-parent families?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo what extent do these mental health challenges impact their academic performance and overall well-being?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre there identifiable differences in the mental health needs and academic outcomes of students from single-parent households compared to those from dual‐parent households?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eCan specific factors\u0026mdash;such as socioeconomic status, parental involvement, and support systems\u0026mdash;explain variations in these outcomes?\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreliminary data from over five years of direct engagement with university students indicate that those from single-parent families often report higher levels of stress and anxiety, along with significant challenges in maintaining academic performance. For example, (Johnson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) noted that many community college students who are single parents experience an intricate balancing act between childcare and studies, leading to a continuous state of mental and physical exhaustion. This is echoed by findings in the literature that suggest socioeconomic constraints and limited access to family support networks exacerbate mental health issues, thereby undermining academic success (Saiin, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition, contemporary research by (Domingo, et al., 2024) and (Van Gasse \u0026amp; Mortelmans, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) contributes valuable insights into the dynamics of mental health in single-parent households. These studies document how economic instability and reduced parental presence can heighten feelings of isolation and stress among students. They also suggest that tailored interventions\u0026mdash;such as counseling services that address both academic and mental health needs\u0026mdash;can play a crucial role in mitigating these adverse effects.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurthermore, emerging evidence from (Guo, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) on learning motivation and (Xie, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) on the psychological impact of parental divorce provides a broader context for understanding the educational and emotional ramifications of single-parent upbringing. These studies underscore that while single-parent status is associated with significant challenges, there are also resilience factors that can be nurtured through targeted support programs. Such findings highlight the importance of not only recognizing the struggles of these students but also leveraging their inherent strengths to foster improved academic outcomes and better mental health.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe significance of this research lies in its potential to inform the development of more effective support systems within higher education. By integrating recent empirical findings and advanced analytical techniques, the study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between mental health and academic performance among students from single-parent families. The ultimate goal is to empower educators, counselors, and policymakers with evidence-based recommendations that will enable them to design interventions tailored to the unique needs of these students.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUltimately, this study endeavors to illuminate the intricate interplay between authentic mental health challenges and academic performance among university students from single-parent households. By synthesizing recent research findings (Mahmood, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) (Saiin, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) (Guo, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) (Johnson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) and employing rigorous analytical methods, the investigation seeks to unravel the multiple factors\u0026mdash;ranging from economic hardships and reduced parental support to elevated stress and anxiety\u0026mdash;that contribute to students\u0026rsquo; academic outcomes. The insights gained from this research will not only advance the scholarly understanding of how family structure influences mental health and educational attainment but will also inform the development of targeted, evidence‐based interventions. Such recommendations are poised to empower educators, mental health professionals, and policymakers to design support systems that foster both academic excellence and robust well-being, thereby ensuring that students from single‐parent families have the resources they need to fully realize their potential.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Literature review","content":" \u003cp\u003eSocioeconomic Status and Family Structure\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnderstanding the impact of family structure on academic achievement has long been a priority in educational research. A significant body of literature indicates that children from single-parent households often experience lower academic performance compared to their peers from two‐parent families\u0026mdash;a relationship that is strongly influenced by socioeconomic status (SES). This section reviews seminal studies and recent contributions to elucidate how family structure, parenting styles, and socioeconomic factors collectively shape educational outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Pong, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e) landmark study investigated the relationship between family structure and academic performance in eighth-grade students. His research demonstrated that students from single-parent households scored significantly lower in both mathematics and reading compared to those from two-parent families. Notably, (Pong, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e) argued that these academic deficits were not solely a function of family structure but were also influenced by the overall school context. In schools where a higher proportion of students came from single-parent households, the overall achievement levels were lower, suggesting that both individual and institutional factors contribute to academic performance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBuilding upon this foundation, (Pong, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e) extended his analysis to tenth-grade students, examining what he termed the \u0026ldquo;school compositional effect\u0026rdquo; of single parenthood. His findings revealed that the negative impact of single-parent family status on academic achievement was magnified when a larger percentage of the school\u0026rsquo;s population came from single-parent households. This work underscores that family structure exerts both direct and contextual effects on educational outcomes, with the school environment playing a critical mediating role.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition to family structure per se, the manner in which parents interact with their children\u0026mdash;the parenting style\u0026mdash;can significantly influence academic and psychological outcomes. (Sanvictores \u0026amp; Mendez, 2024) provide a comprehensive overview of different parenting styles, categorizing them into authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, and neglectful types. Their analysis suggests that in single-parent households, where resources and time may be more constrained, parenting behaviors often tend toward authoritarian or permissive styles. Such approaches may inadvertently contribute to higher levels of stress and lower academic motivation among children. By contrasting these styles, (Sanvictores \u0026amp; Mendez, 2024) highlight that not all single-parent environments are alike; the specific parenting strategies employed can either exacerbate or mitigate the adverse effects associated with single parenthood.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA recurring challenge in this body of research is the measurement and conceptualization of SES. (Antonoplis, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) critically examines the traditional approaches to studying socioeconomic status, identifying several conceptual problems. He argues that conventional measures, which often focus narrowly on income, fail to capture the multidimensional nature of SES\u0026mdash;including education, occupational prestige, and access to social and cultural capital. By proposing an alternative framework, (Antonoplis, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) urges researchers to adopt a more comprehensive perspective when assessing the interplay between SES and family structure. This perspective is particularly important when considering that the disadvantages linked to single-parent households may be compounded by broader socioeconomic inequalities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Kearney, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) recent work, \u003cem\u003eThe Two-Parent Privilege: How Americans Stopped Getting Married and Started Falling Behind\u003c/em\u003e, provides a broader societal context for understanding the impact of family structure on socioeconomic outcomes. (Kearney, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) argues that the traditional two-parent family is associated with greater access to resources, social support, and economic stability\u0026mdash;a configuration that confers distinct advantages in terms of educational and occupational outcomes. This \u0026ldquo;privilege\u0026rdquo; is evident in the comparative performance of students from dual-parent households versus those from single-parent families, suggesting that changes in marriage patterns have significant implications for the distribution of socioeconomic resources and, consequently, academic achievement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile much of the literature emphasizes the challenges associated with single-parent families, (Yan \u0026amp; Gai, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) offer a more nuanced view by exploring the phenomenon of academic resilience among students from low-SES backgrounds. Their study identifies protective factors\u0026mdash;such as supportive school environments, high parental expectations, and community resources\u0026mdash;that enable some students to achieve high academic outcomes despite economic disadvantages. (Yan \u0026amp; Gai, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) demonstrate that the negative effects of low SES and single-parent status are not inevitable; rather, they can be offset by interventions that bolster the resilience of students. This comparative insight is valuable for educators and policymakers seeking to design targeted support programs that promote academic success among disadvantaged populations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCollectively, these studies illustrate a complex interplay between family structure and socioeconomic status. On one hand, (Pong, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e) (Pong, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e) research provides strong empirical evidence that students from single-parent households tend to underperform academically, a trend that is exacerbated by the overall composition of the school environment. On the other hand, the work of (Sanvictores \u0026amp; Mendez, 2024) shows that parenting styles in single-parent homes play a crucial role in mediating these outcomes, while (Antonoplis, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) challenges researchers to rethink how SES is conceptualized and measured. Moreover, (Kearney, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) analysis of the \u0026ldquo;two-parent privilege\u0026rdquo; contextualizes these findings within broader societal trends, and (Yan \u0026amp; Gai, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) offer evidence that academic resilience is possible even in the face of socioeconomic adversity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe literature, therefore, suggests that the academic challenges faced by students from single-parent families are not solely a result of the absence of a second parent but are deeply intertwined with broader socioeconomic factors and parenting practices. These insights have profound implications for the design of educational interventions and policies aimed at reducing the achievement gap. Future research should focus on longitudinal analyses that can further disentangle these complex relationships and on intervention studies that test the efficacy of strategies designed to support students from single-parent and low-SES backgrounds.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMental Health Outcomes in Single-Parent Families\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe mental health outcomes experienced by individuals from single-parent families have emerged as a critical concern in both developmental and educational research. Recent investigations, including preliminary work by (Guo, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) and (Xie, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e), suggest that children and adolescents growing up in single‐parent households face a heightened risk for internalizing disorders such as anxiety, depression, and chronic stress. These adverse outcomes are often linked to the structural challenges inherent in single‐parent family dynamics, where reduced parental availability, financial constraints, and limited social support contribute to elevated emotional burdens. For instance, the stress associated with single‐parenting may impair effective emotion regulation, resulting in persistent symptoms of depression and anxiety that not only affect overall mental well-being but also hinder academic and social functioning.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eComplementing these findings, (Kroese, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) conducted a systematic review examining the association between growing up in single-parent families and the criminal involvement of adolescents. Their analysis revealed that the absence of a second parental figure can lead to less supervision and higher levels of stress, which in turn may predispose adolescents to engage in delinquent behaviors. Although criminal involvement represents an externalizing outcome, it is closely intertwined with mental health; the chronic strain and lack of adequate familial support often manifest in both internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems. This body of work underscores the importance of addressing mental health outcomes holistically, as they encompass not only psychological distress but also behaviors that have broader social implications.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt the same time, broader policy contexts play a significant role in shaping mental health outcomes in single-parent families. (Simpson, et al., 2021) systematically reviewed the effects of social security policy reforms in high-income countries and found that changes in public policy\u0026mdash;particularly those affecting financial and social support\u0026mdash;can either mitigate or exacerbate mental health disparities. For single-parent families, who are disproportionately affected by economic hardship, policies that enhance access to financial resources, healthcare, and social services have the potential to alleviate some of the adverse mental health outcomes. Conversely, reductions in social support mechanisms tend to deepen mental health inequalities, suggesting that policy interventions are crucial in buffering the negative effects associated with single-parent household structures.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWithin the higher education context, the prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems have been the focus of several systematic reviews. (Sheldon, et al., 2021) conducted a meta-analysis on undergraduate students and found that mental health issues such as anxiety, depression, and stress are not only common but also significantly influenced by socioeconomic and familial factors. University students from single-parent families, in particular, appear to be more vulnerable to these mental health challenges. Financial strains, combined with the pressure to balance academic responsibilities with familial obligations, create a \u0026ldquo;perfect storm\u0026rdquo; that exacerbates psychological distress. Such findings are further supported by ( Bartolom\u0026eacute;-Valenzuela, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e), who demonstrated that patterns of adverse childhood experiences are strongly associated with lower mental well-being among university students. These studies collectively suggest that the cumulative impact of early adverse experiences\u0026mdash;often more prevalent in single-parent households\u0026mdash;can have enduring effects on mental health that persist into young adulthood and potentially interfere with academic success.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoreover, qualitative research provides additional depth to our understanding of mental health outcomes in these families. For example, (Liebe, et al., 2024) explored mothers\u0026rsquo; lived experiences with food insecurity, revealing that the constant stress of not having reliable access to nutritious food has profound mental health implications. The study found that chronic food insecurity not only elevates anxiety and depressive symptoms among mothers but also affects their capacity to provide a stable and supportive environment for their children. This narrative of lived experience enriches the quantitative findings by illustrating the day-to-day realities and coping strategies employed by single-parent families facing significant resource constraints.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen considering these diverse strands of research, several key insights emerge. First, the mental health challenges associated with single-parent family structures are multifaceted; they encompass both internalizing issues such as depression and anxiety, and externalizing behaviors that may include criminal involvement. Second, the socioeconomic context is a critical moderator of these outcomes. As Simpson et al.\u0026rsquo;s systematic review indicates, policy reforms that bolster social security and access to support services can have a significant positive effect on mental health, while reductions in these supports are linked to worse outcomes. Third, higher education presents unique stressors that compound the pre-existing vulnerabilities associated with single-parent backgrounds. The systematic review by Sheldon et al. highlights that university students face distinct pressures\u0026mdash;including academic workload and the challenges of transitioning to independent living\u0026mdash;that can exacerbate mental health difficulties. Finally, the interplay between adverse childhood experiences and ongoing resource constraints, as detailed by ( Bartolom\u0026eacute;-Valenzuela, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e)., suggests that the mental health repercussions of single-parenting are both deep-rooted and far-reaching.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn synthesizing the current literature, it becomes evident that the mental health outcomes in single-parent families cannot be fully understood without considering the broader socioeconomic and policy contexts, as well as the personal narratives of those directly affected. The research points to a need for interventions that address not only the immediate psychological distress but also the underlying economic and social conditions that contribute to these outcomes. For instance, strategies that improve access to mental health services, enhance parental support, and provide financial assistance could collectively reduce the mental health burden in these families. Furthermore, longitudinal studies are needed to track how early adverse experiences in single-parent households influence long-term mental health trajectories and academic performance, particularly as students progress into higher education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverall, the literature underscores a complex, interrelated set of factors that contribute to the mental health outcomes observed in single-parent families. The findings from (Guo, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) and (Xie, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) provide emerging evidence of the heightened psychological challenges in these settings, while systematic reviews by (Kroese, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), (Simpson, et al., 2021), and (Sheldon, et al., 2021). reinforce the link between socioeconomic disadvantage, adverse childhood experiences, and mental health. Additionally, qualitative insights from studies such as (Liebe, et al., 2024). offer critical perspectives on the lived realities of these families, emphasizing that the mental health issues encountered are deeply embedded in both structural and personal factors. This comprehensive synthesis of the literature not only highlights the urgency of addressing mental health in single-parent families but also lays the groundwork for developing targeted, multidimensional interventions that can mitigate these challenges and promote better academic and psychological outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParental Involvement and Support\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParental involvement and support are widely recognized as critical factors that shape children\u0026rsquo;s academic and developmental outcomes. (Johnson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) highlights that active parental engagement is associated with improved academic performance and emotional well-being in students, underscoring the significance of parental presence throughout the educational journey. This involvement encompasses a range of activities from homework assistance and school event participation to the provision of emotional support, each contributing uniquely to a child\u0026rsquo;s learning experience.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(Froiland, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) extends this discussion by proposing a comprehensive model of parent involvement that emphasizes psychological facets. According to (Froiland, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e), parental involvement is not merely about physical presence or participation in school activities; rather, it also involves the quality of the interaction between parents and children. Psychological components\u0026mdash;such as parental beliefs, attitudes, and expectations\u0026mdash;are instrumental in shaping how parents engage with their child\u0026rsquo;s education. For instance, parents who exhibit high levels of emotional support and maintain positive expectations can foster a sense of competence and motivation in their children. This supportive behavior, in turn, is linked to better academic and social outcomes across different educational stages.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe impact of parenting style on early childhood learning further illustrates the importance of parental involvement. (Kong \u0026amp; Yasmin, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) study on the impact of parenting style on early childhood learning emphasizes that parenting behaviors have both direct and indirect effects on children\u0026rsquo;s learning processes. In their research, parental self-efficacy\u0026mdash;defined as a parent\u0026rsquo;s belief in their ability to influence their child\u0026rsquo;s educational and developmental outcomes\u0026mdash;plays a mediating role between parenting style and early learning achievements. This finding suggests that when parents are confident and capable in their roles, they are more likely to engage in effective parenting practices, which then contribute positively to their children\u0026rsquo;s academic progress. Conversely, lower self-efficacy can lead to less supportive interactions and, ultimately, poorer educational outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoreover, these studies collectively indicate that the benefits of parental involvement extend beyond academic performance. They contribute to the overall development of social skills, self-esteem, and emotional regulation in children. When parents actively participate in their children\u0026rsquo;s education, they not only provide practical assistance with schoolwork but also serve as role models of resilience and positive coping strategies. The interplay between parental self-efficacy and parenting style, as identified by (Kong \u0026amp; Yasmin, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), further reinforces the idea that support at home is multi-dimensional, encompassing both behavioral and psychological components.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTaken together, the evidence indicates that parental involvement and support are essential for fostering optimal academic and developmental outcomes in children. (Johnson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) underscores the positive associations between active parental engagement and student success, while (Froiland, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) and (Kong \u0026amp; Yasmin, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) reveal that the quality of parental interaction\u0026mdash;shaped by psychological factors and self-efficacy\u0026mdash;is a key determinant of effective involvement. These insights carry significant implications for educators and policymakers, emphasizing the need to develop interventions that strengthen family engagement in education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInterplay Between Mental Health and Academic Performance\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe interplay between mental health and academic performance is a critical area of inquiry, as emerging evidence suggests a bidirectional relationship where each influences the other. Agnafors, Barmark, and Sydsj\u0026ouml; (2021) examined both selection and causation effects from childhood to early adulthood and found that early mental health difficulties can lead to poorer academic outcomes, which in turn may further exacerbate psychological challenges. Their study emphasizes that mental health issues are not merely consequences of academic struggles but can also act as precursors to declining academic performance, underscoring the complex, reciprocal nature of this relationship.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eExpanding on these findings, Deng et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) investigated how family and academic stress jointly impact students\u0026rsquo; depression levels and academic performance. Their research demonstrated that stress originating from both familial environments and academic pressures significantly predicts higher depression scores, which are closely associated with lower academic achievement. This dual-stressor model suggests that the negative impact on academic performance may be mitigated if interventions can reduce stress at home and improve students\u0026rsquo; coping mechanisms, thereby alleviating depressive symptoms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoreover, the role of digital media in shaping mental health and academic outcomes is gaining attention. Foroughi et al. (2022) explored the associations between Instagram addiction, social anxiety, depression, and life satisfaction among university students. Their findings indicate that higher levels of social media addiction are linked to increased social anxiety and depression, which in turn impair academic performance. Together, these studies underscore a multifaceted relationship: mental health challenges and academic performance are intertwined and influenced by various factors, including family stress, academic pressure, and digital media use. This complex interplay calls for comprehensive strategies that address both the psychological and contextual factors impacting student success.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheoretical Frameworks and Models\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition to the foundational perspectives discussed earlier, a closer examination of family dynamics through the lens of enmeshed family systems further illuminates the intricate interplay between mental health and academic performance. The study published in the \u003cem\u003eJournal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Law\u003c/em\u003e (Garber, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) revisits the dynamics of enmeshed family systems, exploring phenomena such as adultification, parentification, and infantilization. These processes occur when children are thrust into roles typically reserved for adults\u0026mdash;either by assuming caregiving responsibilities or by being involved in complex family decision-making processes. Such early role reversals can disrupt normal developmental trajectories, leading to long-term emotional distress and, consequently, lower academic achievement. (Priest, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e) comprehensive discussion of Family Systems Theory supports this view, emphasizing that the family operates as an interconnected system where dysfunction in one area inevitably affects the entire unit. (Huang, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) moderated mediation model, for example, highlights how impaired family functioning can lower self-esteem and strain peer relationships, thereby increasing the risk of adolescent depression. These findings suggest that the adverse effects of dysfunctional family dynamics are not confined solely to psychological outcomes but extend into the academic domain.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoreover, the transactional theory of stress provides additional depth in understanding how students navigate the combined pressures of family and academic life. (Sharma \u0026amp; Gupta, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) applied a multidimensional transactional approach to explore technostress, cognitive appraisal, and coping strategies, showing that stress is a dynamic process influenced by individual perceptions and responses rather than solely by external demands. This perspective complements the Family Systems Theory by suggesting that even when adverse family dynamics contribute to mental health challenges, the degree to which these challenges impair academic performance can be moderated by effective personal coping mechanisms. In a similar (Deng, et al., 2022) demonstrated that both family and academic stress jointly influence depression levels, which in turn negatively affect academic performance. These models collectively underscore that mental health and academic outcomes result from a complex interplay of structural family dynamics, individual stress appraisals, and external support systems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTogether, these theoretical frameworks\u0026mdash;Family Systems Theory and the transactional theory of stress\u0026mdash;provide a comprehensive model for understanding the interplay between mental health and academic performance. By integrating insights from legal analyses of enmeshed family dynamics (Garber, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e)empirical models of family functioning (Huang, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e), and studies on stress appraisal (Sharma \u0026amp; Gupta, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) (Deng, et al., 2022), we gain a nuanced understanding of how individual, familial, and contextual factors converge to shape both mental health and educational outcomes. This integrated approach not only informs our theoretical understanding but also points to the potential for targeted interventions that address both the emotional and cognitive dimensions of stress, ultimately aiming to improve academic success among students from single-parent families.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntervention Strategies and Policy Implications\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntervention strategies and policy implications represent a critical avenue for addressing educational inequalities and supporting student success, particularly among vulnerable populations such as first-generation college students and those facing nonfinancial barriers to college access. (Dynarski, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) Chap.\u0026nbsp;5 provide robust evidence on how addressing nonfinancial barriers\u0026mdash;such as inadequate academic advising, limited access to mental health services, and insufficient campus support\u0026mdash;can significantly enhance college access and success. Their work underscores that policies must extend beyond financial aid, incorporating measures that build comprehensive support systems aimed at fostering both academic persistence and overall well-being.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eComplementing this perspective, (Amirkhan, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) explore the phenomenon of stress overload in first-generation college students. Their study reveals that the overwhelming pressures faced by these students\u0026mdash;stemming from academic demands, familial responsibilities, and social isolation\u0026mdash;can lead to significant psychological distress. Targeted interventions, such as counseling programs tailored to the unique stressors of first-generation students, have demonstrated potential in mitigating these adverse outcomes. By reducing stress and enhancing coping strategies, these interventions not only improve mental health but also contribute to better academic performance, thereby reducing dropout rates.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurther expanding the discussion, Carmen Aina and colleagues (Aina, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) provide a comprehensive review of the socio-economic determinants of university dropout. Their synthesis of the literature highlights that factors such as economic hardship, lack of social capital, and insufficient institutional support play pivotal roles in student attrition. These findings suggest that intervention strategies must be multifaceted\u0026mdash;addressing both the immediate academic challenges and the underlying socio-economic barriers that predispose students to dropout. Policy implications drawn from this review advocate for integrated approaches that combine academic support services with broader social and community-based initiatives to create a more inclusive educational environment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition, (Easterbrook \u0026amp; Hadden, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) offer insights from social psychology to tackle educational inequalities by focusing on the role of identities, contexts, and tailored interventions. Their work demonstrates that strategies which acknowledge and incorporate students\u0026rsquo; diverse backgrounds\u0026mdash;by promoting positive identity formation, fostering supportive peer and mentor relationships, and creating inclusive campus climates\u0026mdash;can effectively reduce educational disparities. These social psychology-based interventions work synergistically with policy reforms, helping to reshape institutional practices in ways that address both the structural and psychological dimensions of educational inequities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCollectively, the literature indicates that effective intervention strategies and policy measures must operate on multiple levels. By addressing nonfinancial barriers, mitigating stress overload, and targeting socio-economic determinants of dropout, institutions can create comprehensive support frameworks that promote academic success and mental well-being. Such integrated approaches not only benefit individual students but also contribute to broader efforts in reducing educational inequalities and fostering a more equitable higher education system.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMethodological Variations in the Literature\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe methodological approaches employed in research on mental health and academic performance\u0026mdash;especially within socio-economically disadvantaged and single-parent contexts\u0026mdash;vary widely, adding both richness and complexity to the literature. For example, ( Bartolom\u0026eacute;-Valenzuela, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e) apply advanced quantitative techniques, such as cluster analysis, to identify distinct patterns of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and examine their associations with lower mental well-being among university students. This approach allows for a nuanced understanding of complex, multidimensional constructs. However, it also raises questions about the replicability and generalizability of such patterns across diverse populations, as the clustering solutions are sensitive to sample characteristics and variable selection. In contrast, (Aina, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) conduct a systematic review focusing on the socio-economic determinants of university dropout. Their review synthesizes findings from a wide range of quantitative studies, providing a comprehensive overview of the socio-economic factors that contribute to educational attrition. Despite offering valuable insights, the review highlights significant methodological heterogeneity\u0026mdash;such as differences in sample sizes, measurement tools, and research designs\u0026mdash;which complicates direct comparisons and the drawing of definitive conclusions regarding causality.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMeanwhile, (Amirkhan, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) investigate stress overload in first-generation college students using validated psychometric surveys. Their quantitative study measures stress levels and links them to academic performance, providing robust empirical evidence of the detrimental impact of stress on student success. However, the cross-sectional nature of their study limits causal inferences, as the snapshot design cannot capture the dynamic changes in stress and performance over time. Complementing these empirical studies, (Antonoplis, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e) offers a critical, conceptual analysis of socioeconomic status (SES) measurement. He argues that traditional SES metrics\u0026mdash;often narrowly focused on income\u0026mdash;fail to capture the full spectrum of social and cultural capital. By proposing a more multidimensional framework, Antonoplis challenges researchers to rethink and refine their measurement approaches, an issue that has implications for all subsequent analyses linking SES with mental health and academic outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLastly, (Deng, et al., 2022) examine the impact of family and academic stress on students\u0026rsquo; depression levels and academic performance using mediation analysis. Their quantitative study demonstrates the interconnected nature of these variables, suggesting that family and academic stressors may indirectly influence academic outcomes through their effect on mental health. As with other cross-sectional studies, the reliance on self-report measures and the absence of longitudinal data constrain the ability to establish definitive causal pathways.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTogether, these methodological variations\u0026mdash;from advanced quantitative analyses and systematic reviews to theoretical critiques\u0026mdash;underscore the need for careful synthesis of findings. Recognizing the strengths and limitations inherent in each approach is crucial for building a coherent understanding of how mental health, academic performance, and socioeconomic factors interact, particularly within vulnerable populations such as students from single-parent families.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003eResearch Design and Approach\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study employed a systematic review methodology to synthesize and critically evaluate the current literature on the interplay between mental health and academic performance among students from single-parent families. A systematic review was chosen due to its rigorous, transparent, and replicable nature, allowing for a comprehensive aggregation of high-quality, peer-reviewed research on this multifaceted topic.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFollowing established protocols and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a comprehensive search strategy was developed. Major academic databases, including PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus, were systematically queried using a combination of keywords and Boolean operators related to \"single-parent families,\" \"mental health,\" \"academic performance,\" and other relevant terms. The search was confined to studies published within a predetermined time frame and in English, ensuring both the currency and accessibility of the literature.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEach retrieved study underwent a two-stage screening process\u0026mdash;initially through titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review\u0026mdash;to ensure relevance and methodological rigor. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were then subjected to data extraction, where key details such as study design, sample characteristics, findings, and theoretical frameworks were systematically recorded.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBy utilizing this systematic review approach, the study aims to consolidate diverse findings, identify prevailing themes and gaps in the literature, and provide an evidence-based foundation for future research and policy interventions in the context of mental health and academic performance in single-parent families.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eData Sources and Search Strategy\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo ensure a comprehensive and unbiased collection of relevant literature, a multi-database search was conducted. Primary sources included well-established academic databases such as PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus. In addition, supplementary searches were carried out using Google Scholar and select institutional repositories to capture any additional studies not indexed in the major databases.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe search strategy was developed using both controlled vocabulary (e.g., MeSH terms) and free-text keywords to encompass the various dimensions of the topic. Key search terms included \u0026ldquo;single-parent families,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;mental health,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;academic performance,\u0026rdquo; \u0026ldquo;university students,\u0026rdquo; and \u0026ldquo;socioeconomic status.\u0026rdquo; Boolean operators (AND, OR) were strategically used to combine these terms, ensuring the retrieval of studies that specifically addressed the intersections of family structure, mental health, and educational outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe literature search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2020 and 2024, ensuring the inclusion of recent and relevant findings. All identified records were imported into reference management software for duplicate removal and efficient screening. A two-step screening process was then implemented\u0026mdash;initially reviewing titles and abstracts to filter out irrelevant studies, followed by a full-text assessment to verify that each article met the predetermined inclusion criteria.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis systematic approach to data sourcing not only maximizes the breadth of the literature collected but also supports a rigorous and transparent selection process, laying a solid foundation for subsequent synthesis and analysis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"No\" id=\"Taba\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMethodological Variation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eApproach/Technique\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFocus/Contribution\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrengths/Limitations\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eQuantitative Cluster Analysis\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUtilizes advanced clustering techniques to identify distinct patterns in data\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscerns patterns in adverse childhood experiences and their association with mental well-being\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOffers nuanced insights into subgroups; sensitive to sample characteristics and variable selection\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eSystematic Literature Review\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAggregates and synthesizes findings from multiple studies using predefined criteria\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProvides a comprehensive overview of socio-economic determinants of university dropout and related outcomes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCaptures broad trends and gaps; heterogeneity in study designs can complicate direct comparisons\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eCross-Sectional Survey Design\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmploys validated psychometric instruments to measure constructs such as stress and depression\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExamines stress overload among first-generation students and its impact on academic performance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDelivers robust empirical evidence; limited in establishing causal relationships due to the snapshot design\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eConceptual Analysis\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCritically evaluates and proposes alternative frameworks for measuring key constructs (e.g., socioeconomic status)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChallenges traditional measurement models by advocating for a multidimensional view beyond income alone\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProvides valuable theoretical insights; empirical validation may be needed for new frameworks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMediation Analysis\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUses quantitative modeling to explore indirect relationships between variables\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInvestigates how family and academic stressors influence depression and academic outcomes through mediating factors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eClarifies complex interrelationships; relies on self-reported data and may be constrained by cross-sectional data\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInclusion and Exclusion Criteria\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn conducting a systematic review, it's essential to establish clear inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure the selection of relevant and high-quality studies. These criteria help define the scope of the review and ensure consistency in study selection. The table below summarizes the inclusion and exclusion criteria applied in this research:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"No\" id=\"Tabb\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"3\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCriterion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInclusion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExclusion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"3\" rowspan=\"4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePublication Type\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Peer-reviewed journal articles\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Non-peer-reviewed articles\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Systematic reviews\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Opinion pieces\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Meta-analyses\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Editorials\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- High-quality conceptual analyses\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Studies lacking robust empirical or conceptual evidence\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eLanguage\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Studies published in English\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Articles published in languages other than English\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePublication Date\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Studies published between 2020 and 2024\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Publications outside the specified date range (unless deemed seminal and essential for contextual understanding)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Seminal works outside this range considered if essential for historical context\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eFocus/Topic\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Research addressing mental health outcomes, academic performance, family structure, socio-economic factors, or parental involvement\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Studies not directly related to the specified topics (e.g., focusing solely on unrelated medical or non-educational issues)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePopulation\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Research focusing on adolescents and university students\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Studies targeting populations outside the educational context or age groups not relevant to the review's focus\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eMethodological Quality\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Studies employing robust quantitative, qualitative, or conceptual methodologies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Studies with limited methodological rigor\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Studies providing meaningful insights into the research questions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e- Studies that do not contribute to a broader understanding of the subject matter\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudy Selection Process\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn conducting a systematic review on the mental health outcomes, academic performance, socio-economic factors, and parental involvement in single-parent families among adolescents and university students, it's essential to follow a structured study selection process. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework provides a standardized method to ensure transparency and reproducibility in systematic reviews.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eData Extraction and Coding\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn systematic reviews, data extraction involves systematically collecting pertinent information from selected studies to facilitate analysis and synthesis. This process ensures that data is consistently and accurately gathered, enabling a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence. \u003cb\u003eCoding\u003c/b\u003e, on the other hand, entails categorizing this extracted data into predefined themes or variables, allowing for structured analysis and identification of patterns across studies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"No\" id=\"Tabc\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudy\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAuthors\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eYear\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePopulation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudy Design\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKey Findings\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLimitations\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePatterns of adverse childhood experiences and associations with lower mental well-being among university students\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBartolom\u0026eacute;-Valenzuela, M., Pereda, N., \u0026amp; Guilera, G.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversity students\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIdentified specific ACEs linked to reduced mental well-being\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSelf-reported data may introduce bias\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe determinants of university dropout: A review of the socio-economic literature\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAina, C., Baici, E., Casalone, G., \u0026amp; Pastore, F.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2022\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversity students\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLiterature review\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHighlighted key socio-economic factors contributing to university dropout rates\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLimited by the scope of reviewed studies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStress overload in first-generation college students: Implications for intervention\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAmirkhan, J. H., Manalo Jr, R., \u0026amp; Velasco, S. E.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2023\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFirst-generation college students\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSurvey-based\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFound high levels of stress overload impacting academic performance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional design limits causal inference\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudying Socioeconomic Status: Conceptual Problems and an Alternative Path Forward\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAntonoplis, S.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2023\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGeneral population\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheoretical analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscussed challenges in measuring socioeconomic status and proposed alternative approaches\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLacks empirical data\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFamily and Academic Stress and Their Impact on Students' Depression Level and Academic Performance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDeng, Y., et al.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2022\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh school students\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLongitudinal study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDemonstrated that both family and academic stress contribute to increased depression and lower academic performance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGeneralizability may be limited to similar populations\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen Two Become One: The Experiences of Students in a Single-Parent Household\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDomingo, H., et al.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudents from single-parent households\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQualitative study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExplored unique challenges faced by students in single-parent households affecting their academic performance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSmall sample size may limit generalizability\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAddressing nonfinancial barriers to college access and success: Evidence and policy implications\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDynarski, S., Nurshatayeva, A., Page, L. C., \u0026amp; Scott-Clayton, J.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2023\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProspective college students\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIdentified nonfinancial barriers such as information gaps and procedural complexities hindering college access and success\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy recommendations may require contextual adaptation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEasterbrook, M. J., \u0026amp; Hadden, I. R.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2020\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiverse student populations\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReview article\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnalyzed how social identities and contexts contribute to educational inequalities and discussed interventions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBroad scope may limit depth in specific areas\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA comprehensive model of preschool through high school parent involvement with emphasis on the psychological facets\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFroiland, J. M.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2021\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSchool-aged children and parents\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheoretical model\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProposed a model emphasizing psychological aspects of parental involvement influencing student outcomes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModel requires empirical validation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Dynamics of the Enmeshed Family System Ten Years Later: Family Court and Contemporary Understanding of Adultification, Parentification, and Infantilization\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGarber, B. D.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2021\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFamilies in family court settings\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReview article\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExamined dynamics of enmeshed family systems and their impact on child development\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFocused on family court cases, which may limit generalizability\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA study on the learning motivation deviation of children in single-parent families\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGuo, X.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChildren from single-parent families\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFound deviations in learning motivation among children from single-parent families compared to two-parent families\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCultural factors may influence findings\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFamily functioning and adolescent depression: A moderated mediation model of self-esteem and peer relationships\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHuang, X., Hu, N., Yao, Z., \u0026amp; Peng, B.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2022\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdolescents\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIdentified that self-esteem and peer relationships mediate the relationship between family functioning and adolescent depression\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional design limits causal conclusions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Lived Experiences of Students Who are Single Parents and Attending Community College: A Phenomenological Study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJohnson, D.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2022\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSingle-parent students\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQualitative study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExplored challenges faced by single-parent students in community colleges, including time management and financial strain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFindings may not generalize to four-year institutions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Two-Parent Privilege: How the decline in marriage has increased inequality and lowered social mobility, and what we can do about it\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKearney, M. S.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2023\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGeneral population\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscussed how the decline in two-parent households contributes to social inequality and proposed policy interventions\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy recommendations may be subject to debate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eImpact of Parenting Style on Early Childhood Learning: Mediating Role of Parental Self-Efficacy\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKong, C., \u0026amp; Yasmin, F.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2022\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEarly childhood students and parents\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFound that parental self-efficacy mediates the relationship between parenting style and early childhood learning outcomes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudy limited to early childhood, may not apply to older students\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGrowing up in single-parent families and the criminal involvement of adolescents: a systematic review\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKroese, J., Bernasco, W., Liefbroer, A. C., \u0026amp; Rouwendal, J.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2020\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdolescents from single-parent families\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSystematic review\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIdentified an association between growing up in single-parent families and increased risk of criminal involvement\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCausality cannot be inferred from reviewed studies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026ldquo;I\u0026rsquo;m Doing the Best that I Can\u0026rdquo;: Mothers Lived Experience with Food Insecurity, Coping Strategies, and Mental Health Implications\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLiebe, R. A., et al.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMothers experiencing food insecurity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQualitative study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExplored coping strategies and mental health implications for mothers facing food insecurity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSmall sample size may limit generalizability\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudents from single-parent households: their issues \u0026amp; challenges\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMahmood, S., Rohaniah, S., \u0026amp; Sangeetha, N.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2023\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudents from single-parent households\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReview article\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscussed various challenges faced by students from single-parent households, including financial and emotional issues\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLacks empirical data\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIssues and Challenges that Students from Single-Parent Households Face in Their Academic Performance at Senior Secondary Level\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePerera, L. I. S.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2022\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSenior secondary students from single-parent households\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIdentified specific academic challenges faced by students from single-parent households at the senior secondary level\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudy limited to a specific ed\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFamily Structure, School Context, and Eighth-Grade Math and Reading Achievement\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePong, S. L.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1997\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEighth-grade students in the U.S.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative analysis using National Education Longitudinal Study data\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSchools with higher proportions of students from single-parent families negatively affect individual student achievement in math and reading. Strong social relations among parents can mitigate these negative effects.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional design limits causal inferences; potential unmeasured confounding variables.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe School Compositional Effect of Single Parenthood on 10th-Grade Achievement\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePong, S. L.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1998\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTenth-grade students in the U.S.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative analysis using National Education Longitudinal Study data\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAttending schools with a high concentration of children from single-parent homes is associated with lower math and reading achievement, even after controlling for individual demographics and family background.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional design; potential for residual confounding.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Science of Family Systems Theory\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePriest, J. B.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2021\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNot specified\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheoretical analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProvides a comprehensive overview of family systems theory, emphasizing the interconnectedness of family members and the impact of family dynamics on individual behavior.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTheoretical work; lacks empirical data.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSingle Parent Responsibilities and Efforts to Children Education: Analysis of Physical, Intellectual and Spiritual\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSaiin, A., Ghafurjonovich, V. G., \u0026amp; Amsalu, A.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSingle parents and their children\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQualitative analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExplores the multifaceted responsibilities of single parents in supporting their children's education, highlighting challenges in physical, intellectual, and spiritual domains.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQualitative design limits generalizability; potential for subjective bias.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTypes of Parenting Styles and Effects on Children\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSanvictores, T., \u0026amp; Mendez, M. D.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNot specified\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLiterature review\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eReviews various parenting styles (authoritative, authoritarian, permissive, uninvolved) and their associated effects on child development, noting that authoritative parenting is generally linked to positive outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRelies on existing literature; may not capture recent studies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInvestigating the Role of Technostress, Cognitive Appraisal, and Coping Strategies on Students' Learning Performance in Higher Education: A Multidimensional Transactional Theory of Stress Approach\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSharma, S., \u0026amp; Gupta, B.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2023\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversity students\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinds that technostress negatively impacts learning performance, but effective coping strategies and positive cognitive appraisal can mitigate these effects.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSelf-reported data may introduce bias; cross-sectional design limits causal conclusions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrevalence and Risk Factors for Mental Health Problems in University Undergraduate Students: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSheldon, E., et al.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2021\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversity undergraduate students\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSystematic review and meta-analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIdentifies a high prevalence of mental health issues among undergraduates, with key risk factors including academic pressure, financial stress, and lack of social support.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePotential publication bias; variability in study methodologies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffects of Social Security Policy Reforms on Mental Health and Inequalities: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies in High-Income Countries\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSimpson, J., et al.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2021\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePopulations in high-income countries\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSystematic review\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinds that certain social security policy reforms are associated with mental health outcomes, with effects varying based on policy design and implementation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eObservational studies limit causal inferences; heterogeneity in policy contexts.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSocial Support in the Process of Household Reorganization After Divorce\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVan Gasse, D., \u0026amp; Mortelmans, D.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2020\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDivorced individuals\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQualitative study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHighlights the crucial role of social support in adjusting to household changes post-divorce, affecting both practical and emotional well-being.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQualitative design; findings may not be generalizable.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Effect of Parental Divorce on Child Depression\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eXie, N.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChildren of divorced parents\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndicates that parental divorce is associated with increased risk of depression in children, with factors such as parental conflict and economic hardship mediating this relationship.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePotential for unmeasured confounding; reliance on self-reported measures.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh Achievers from Low Family Socioeconomic Status Families: Protective Factors for Academically Resilient Students\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eYan, Y., \u0026amp; Gai, X.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2022\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcademically resilient students from low-SES families\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMixed-methods study\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIdentifies protective factors such as strong parental support, intrinsic motivation, and positive school environments that contribute to academic resilience.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMixed-methods design; potential for selection bias.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuality Assessment\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo ensure the reliability and validity of the findings in this systematic review, a structured quality assessment was conducted. This process aimed to evaluate the methodological rigor, risk of bias, and overall credibility of the included studies. Given the diverse range of research designs\u0026mdash;quantitative, qualitative, and systematic reviews\u0026mdash;a combination of established quality assessment tools was used.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eAssessment Criteria\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe quality of each study was evaluated based on the following key criteria:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eRelevance to Research Questions\u003c/b\u003e \u0026ndash; Studies were assessed for their direct contribution to the themes of mental health, academic performance, and socio-economic factors in single-parent families.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eStudy Design and Methodology\u003c/b\u003e \u0026ndash; The methodological strength of each study was reviewed, considering factors such as sample size, study setting, and research approach.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eData Collection and Analysis\u003c/b\u003e \u0026ndash; The validity and reliability of the data collection methods, statistical analyses, and interpretation of findings were evaluated.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eRisk of Bias\u003c/b\u003e \u0026ndash; Potential biases, including selection bias, reporting bias, and confounding factors, were identified.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eGeneralizability\u003c/b\u003e \u0026ndash; The extent to which study findings could be applied to broader populations was considered.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"No\" id=\"Tabd\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAssessment Criteria\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh-Quality Studies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate-Quality Studies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLower-Quality Studies\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eRelevance to Research Questions\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDirectly addresses mental health, academic performance, and socio-economic factors in single-parent families\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProvides useful theoretical or contextual insights but lacks empirical data\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarginal relevance, does not fully align with core research themes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eStudy Design and Methodology\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUses robust quantitative analysis, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses with large sample sizes\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmploys qualitative methods or theoretical frameworks with limited empirical support\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWeak study design, unclear methodology, small or non-representative sample\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eData Collection and Analysis\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUses validated tools, standardized data collection, and advanced statistical analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRelies on self-reported data or non-standardized measures\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePoor data collection methods, lack of validation, or unclear analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eRisk of Bias\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLow risk; well-controlled for confounding variables and potential biases\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome risk due to self-reported measures or subjective interpretation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh risk of selection, response, or reporting bias\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eGeneralizability\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFindings applicable to broader populations due to large, diverse samples\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLimited generalizability due to small or specialized samples\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNot generalizable due to case-specific or anecdotal nature\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eStrength of Evidence Contribution\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrong empirical foundation, provides clear and replicable insights\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eContributes to theoretical discussions but lacks empirical validation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWeak contribution to the evidence base, lacks replicability\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eData Synthesis and Analysis\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo integrate and compare findings from the selected literature, this study employed a \u003cb\u003enarrative synthesis\u003c/b\u003e combined with elements of \u003cb\u003ethematic analysis\u003c/b\u003e. Given the diverse range of research designs\u0026mdash;including quantitative, qualitative, and theoretical studies\u0026mdash;this approach allowed for a structured yet flexible method of analyzing and interpreting the existing evidence.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eNarrative Synthesis Approach\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA narrative synthesis was used to systematically summarize and interpret findings across studies. This method is particularly effective for synthesizing heterogeneous research, where direct statistical meta-analysis is not feasible due to variations in study design, population, and measurement tools. The synthesis process followed these key steps:\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e1. Organizing Studies by Key Themes\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudies were categorized based on their primary focus, such as mental health outcomes, academic performance, socio-economic factors, parental involvement, and intervention strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis categorization allowed for a structured comparison of findings across different research areas.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e2. Comparing and Contrasting Findings\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003ePatterns, consistencies, and discrepancies across studies were identified.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eAttention was given to variations in research methodologies and sample characteristics to understand potential reasons for differences in findings.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e3. Identifying Gaps in the Literature\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudies were assessed for limitations in scope, methodology, and generalizability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnexplored or under-researched areas were highlighted to inform future research directions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eThematic Analysis\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo further refine the synthesis, a thematic analysis approach was applied. This involved:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e1. Coding Key Themes\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecurring patterns and concepts in the literature were identified and coded into thematic categories.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor example, studies on mental health and academic performance were coded for common stressors, coping mechanisms, and intervention strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e2. Developing Conceptual Linkages\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eThematic connections between different studies were established, allowing for a broader understanding of how various factors interact.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor example, studies on socio-economic status were linked to findings on educational inequalities and mental health disparities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eJustification for the Chosen Methods\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA meta-analysis was not conducted due to the methodological diversity of the included studies, variations in measurement tools, and inconsistencies in reporting statistical data. Instead, a narrative synthesis and thematic analysis were chosen to provide a comprehensive and integrative review of the existing literature, capturing both empirical findings and theoretical perspectives.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBy using this approach, the study effectively synthesizes existing knowledge while identifying key insights, trends, and gaps, contributing to a deeper understanding of the relationship between mental health, academic performance, and socio-economic factors in single-parent families.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLimitations and Ethical Considerations\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study has certain limitations that must be acknowledged. The research was limited to peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2020 and 2024, which may have excluded relevant non-English or older studies that could provide additional insights. Differences in research methodologies, sample populations, and data collection techniques among the included studies created challenges in making direct comparisons. Additionally, publication bias may have influenced the findings, as studies with significant results are more likely to be published, potentially underrepresenting studies with null or negative outcomes. Since this study relies entirely on secondary data, there was no control over the quality, accuracy, or potential biases present in the original research.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEthical considerations were carefully addressed throughout the study. Only ethically conducted and peer-reviewed research was included to ensure credibility and reliability. All sources were properly cited to maintain academic integrity and avoid plagiarism. Transparency was maintained by clearly documenting the search strategy, selection criteria, and methodology, ensuring that the review remains replicable and accessible for future researchers.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study explores the impact of mental health challenges on academic performance among students from single-parent families, examining whether these struggles are genuine or sometimes used as an excuse for poor academic outcomes. The findings highlight the complex relationship between socio-economic conditions, parental involvement, and institutional support, showing that while some students exhibit resilience and perform well academically despite adversity, others face significant obstacles. This chapter critically interprets the findings in light of the research questions, discussing both positive and negative aspects and considering broader implications for policy, practice, and future research.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMental Health and Academic Performance\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe relationship between mental health and academic performance is well-documented, with numerous studies indicating that students from single-parent families experience higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, all of which negatively impact their ability to succeed in school ( Bartolom\u0026eacute;-Valenzuela, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). The absence of financial and emotional stability in many single-parent households can lead to a lack of focus, reduced motivation, and overall academic disengagement. These challenges are further compounded when students do not have access to mental health support, resulting in decreased academic performance (Xie, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, while mental health issues genuinely affect many students, there is also evidence suggesting that some students may use mental health struggles as an excuse for academic failure. This does not mean that their challenges are not real, but rather that the growing awareness and normalization of mental health issues have created a space where students may rely on these struggles to justify poor performance rather than seeking constructive solutions. In some cases, students might claim anxiety, depression, or stress as reasons for failing exams or missing assignments, despite having had adequate preparation time. While mental health conditions are serious and deserve attention, the misuse of mental health claims can diminish the legitimacy of those who truly need support (Deng, et al., 2022).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother important aspect to consider is how institutional policies respond to mental health claims. Some universities and schools have implemented lenient academic policies, such as deadline extensions and reduced coursework, for students citing mental health issues. While these policies are intended to support struggling students, they can also be misused by those seeking to avoid academic responsibility. The challenge, therefore, lies in distinguishing genuine struggles from cases where students may exploit the system. Future research should explore how institutions can create balanced policies that provide necessary support without encouraging academic complacency.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSocioeconomic Factors and Educational Barriers\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomic instability is one of the most significant challenges faced by students from single-parent families. Studies show that financial hardships often force students to balance part-time jobs with academic responsibilities, leading to increased stress and reduced study time (Pong, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e). These financial burdens also limit access to essential academic resources, such as tutoring, technology, and extracurricular activities, putting students at a disadvantage compared to their peers from two-parent households (Kearney, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, some students overcome financial difficulties through resilience, determination, and institutional support. Many universities offer scholarships, financial aid programs, and academic mentoring to help economically disadvantaged students succeed (Aina, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Some students from single-parent families even outperform their peers due to their strong sense of responsibility and motivation to break free from financial hardship. This suggests that while socio-economic barriers present real challenges, they do not always determine a student\u0026rsquo;s academic success.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt the same time, financial struggles can also be used as an excuse for poor performance. Some students attribute their academic failures to financial constraints when, in reality, the issue may stem from poor time management, lack of motivation, or inadequate study habits. While financial difficulties certainly impact education, many successful students have found ways to overcome these challenges through scholarships, student loans, and work-study programs. This highlights the need for a more nuanced understanding of how financial barriers interact with personal accountability in academic success.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eParental Involvement and Support\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eParental support plays a crucial role in a student\u0026rsquo;s academic performance. Studies suggest that engaged and supportive single parents positively influence their children\u0026rsquo;s educational outcomes by fostering discipline, motivation, and strong study habits (Sanvictores \u0026amp; Mendez, 2024). When single parents maintain open communication with teachers, set academic expectations, and provide emotional support, their children tend to perform better in school (Froiland, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, many single parents struggle to balance work responsibilities with active participation in their children\u0026rsquo;s education. Due to time constraints, they may be unable to assist with homework, attend parent-teacher meetings, or provide the same level of supervision as two-parent households (Saiin, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). This lack of involvement can lead to students feeling unsupported and disengaged from their studies, increasing the likelihood of academic failure (Priest, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn some cases, students from single-parent families may use the absence of parental supervision as an excuse for poor academic performance. They may claim that their parent\u0026rsquo;s workload prevents them from completing assignments or preparing for exams, despite having the same study resources as their peers. While this may be true for some, it is also important to recognize that many students in similar situations manage to excel academically. This raises the question of whether self-discipline and personal responsibility play a greater role in academic success than parental involvement alone.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eThe Role of Student Accountability in Academic Performance\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eOne of the key debates in the discussion of academic struggles is the role of personal accountability. While it is undeniable that mental health issues, financial hardships, and lack of parental support create obstacles, students must also take responsibility for their academic success. Studies show that students who actively seek help, manage their time effectively, and adopt problem-solving skills are more likely to succeed, regardless of their background (Guo, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConversely, students who rely too heavily on external factors to explain their academic failures may struggle to develop resilience and self-discipline. This is not to dismiss genuine struggles but to highlight the importance of balancing external challenges with personal responsibility. Educational institutions should encourage students to develop proactive coping mechanisms rather than fostering a culture where struggles are seen solely as barriers rather than challenges to overcome.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eIntervention Strategies and Policy Implications\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMany intervention programs have been implemented to support students from single-parent families, with varying degrees of success. Some universities offer counseling services, mentorship programs, and financial aid, which have been shown to improve academic outcomes (Dynarski, et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Schools that integrate mental health education and academic support systems create environments where students feel supported and empowered to succeed (Easterbrook \u0026amp; Hadden, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHowever, not all intervention strategies are effective. Many students are unaware of the resources available to them, and even when they are, they may not actively seek help due to stigma or lack of motivation (Liebe, et al., 2024). Additionally, some policies focus too much on accommodating struggling students rather than empowering them to overcome challenges. Future policies should strike a balance between offering necessary support and encouraging self-reliance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLimitations of the Existing Literature and Future Research Directions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite the extensive research on this topic, there are several gaps in the literature. Many studies rely on self-reported data, which may not accurately reflect the extent of students' struggles or their ability to manage academic responsibilities (Deng, et al., 2022). Additionally, cross-sectional research designs limit our ability to determine causality between mental health issues and academic performance. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies that track students over time to better understand the long-term effects of single-parent family structures on education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurthermore, most studies focus on Western contexts, with limited research on students from low-income or culturally diverse backgrounds. Expanding research to include different socio-economic and cultural settings would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe discussion of mental health and academic performance among students from single-parent families is multifaceted, with both challenges and opportunities. While financial strain, lack of parental involvement, and mental health struggles pose significant barriers, resilience, institutional support, and personal accountability play a crucial role in determining academic success. It is essential to address these issues through policy reforms, targeted interventions, and further research to create a more equitable and supportive educational environment. Ultimately, students must be encouraged to take responsibility for their academic success while also receiving the necessary support to navigate challenges effectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study explores the complex relationship between mental health, academic performance, and socio-economic conditions among students from single-parent families. By systematically reviewing existing literature, the research highlights both the genuine struggles faced by these students and the potential misuse of mental health claims as an excuse for academic challenges. The findings indicate that students from single-parent households often experience higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, which negatively impact their academic engagement and performance. Additionally, financial instability and limited parental involvement further contribute to educational disparities. However, the research also reveals that many students exhibit resilience, overcoming these obstacles through institutional support, personal motivation, and coping mechanisms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile mental health challenges are a significant barrier to academic success, the discussion also raises concerns about students misusing mental health claims to justify academic failure. This underscores the need for balanced institutional policies that provide necessary support while ensuring academic accountability. Schools and universities must implement targeted interventions, such as mental health counseling, flexible academic accommodations, and financial aid programs, to assist students genuinely struggling with mental health issues. At the same time, educational institutions must establish clear guidelines to prevent the misuse of these support systems.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe broader implications of this research extend to policymakers and educators who must develop comprehensive strategies to bridge the educational gap for students from single-parent families. Financial aid programs, stronger parental engagement initiatives, and school-based mental health resources can play a crucial role in promoting both equity and accountability in education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite the valuable insights gained, this study also acknowledges the limitations of the existing literature, particularly the reliance on self-reported data, cross-sectional designs, and Western-centric research perspectives. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies that track students over time to better understand the long-term effects of single-parent family structures on academic and psychological well-being. Additionally, expanding research to diverse socio-economic and cultural contexts will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced by students from single-parent households globally.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, this study reinforces the importance of institutional, parental, and policy-driven support for students navigating the dual pressures of mental health struggles and academic performance. Addressing these challenges through evidence-based interventions and further research is essential in creating an inclusive, supportive, and accountable educational system for all students, regardless of their family structure.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBartolom\u0026eacute;-Valenzuela M, Pereda N, Guilera G (2024) Patterns of adverse childhood experiences and associations with lower mental well-being among university students. Child Abuse Negl Issue. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106770\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106770\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAina C, Baici E, Casalone G, Pastore F (2022) The determinants of university dropout: A review of the socio-economic literature. Socio-Economic Plann Sci, 79\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAmirkhan JH, Manalo Jr R, Velasco SE (2023) Stress overload in first-generation college students: Implications for intervention. Psychol Serv 20(3):636\u0026ndash;646\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAntonoplis S (2023) Studying Socioeconomic Status: Conceptual Problems and an Alternative Path Forward. Perspect Psychol Sci 18(2):275\u0026ndash;292\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDeng Y et al (2022) Family and Academic Stress and Their Impact on Students' Depression Level and Academic Performance. Sec Public Mental Health 13. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.869337)\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpsyt.2022.869337)\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDomingo H et al (2024) When Two Become One: The Experiences of Students in a Single-Parent Household. Psychol EDUCATION: MULTIDISCIPLINARY J 24(1):1\u0026ndash;12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDynarski S, Nurshatayeva A, Page LC, Scott-Clayton J (2023) Chapter 5 - Addressing nonfinancial barriers to college access and success: Evidence and policy implications. Handb Econ Educ 6:319\u0026ndash;403\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEasterbrook MJ, Hadden IR (2020) Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions. Social Issues Policy Rev 15(1):180\u0026ndash;236\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFroiland JM (2021) A comprehensive model of preschool through high school parent involvement with emphasis on the psychological facets. School Psychol Int 42(2):103\u0026ndash;131\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarber BD (2021) The Dynamics of the Enmeshed Family System Ten Years Later: Family Court and Contemporary Understanding of Adultification, Parentification, and Infantilization. J Am Acad Matrimonial Lawyers, 34(1)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGuo X (2024) A study on the learning motivation deviation of children in single-parent families. Applied Educational Psychology 5:152\u0026ndash;158\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHuang X, Hu N, Yao Z, Peng B (2022) Family functioning and adolescent depression: A moderated mediation model of self-esteem and peer relationships. Sec Educational Psychol, 13\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJohnson D (2022) The Lived Experiences of Students Who are Single Parents and Attending Community College: A Phenomenological Study. \u003cem\u003eElectronic Theses and Dissertations\u003c/em\u003e, Issue \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://dc.etsu.edu/etd/4137\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/4137\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKearney MS (2023) \u003cem\u003eThe Two-Parent Privilege: How the decline in marriage has increased inequality and lowered social mobility, and what we can do about it\u003c/em\u003e. Swift, s.l.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKong C, Yasmin F (2022) Impact of Parenting Style on Early Childhood Learning: Mediating Role of Parental Self-Efficacy. Sec Dev Psychol 13. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928629)\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpsyg.2022.928629)\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKroese J, Bernasco W, Liefbroer AC, Rouwendal J (2020) Growing up in single-parent families and the criminal involvement of adolescents: a systematic review. Psychology Crime Law 27(1):61\u0026ndash;75\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiebe RA et al (2024) I\u0026rsquo;m Doing the Best that I Can: Mothers Lived Experience with Food Insecurity, Coping Strategies, and Mental Health Implications. Curr Developments Nutr, 8(4)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMahmood S, Rohaniah S, Sangeetha N (2023) Students from single-parent households: their issues \u0026amp; challenges. Asian Social Work Journal ( 8(4):1\u0026ndash;1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePerera LIS (2022) Issues and Challenges that Students from Single-Parent Households Face in Their Academic Performance at Senior Secondary Level. SLIIT J Humanit Sci 2(1):60\u0026ndash;75\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePong SL (1997) Family Structure, School Context, and Eighth-Grade Math and Reading Achievement. J Marriage Family 59(3):734\u0026ndash;746\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePong SP (1998) The School Compositional Effect of Single Parenthood on 10th-Grade Achievement. Sociol Educ 71(1):23\u0026ndash;42\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePriest JB (2021) \u003cem\u003eThe Science of Family Systems Theory.\u003c/em\u003e 1 ed. s.l.:Routledge\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSaiin A, Ghafurjonovich VG, Amsalu A (2024) Single Parent Responsibilities and Efforts to Children Education: Analysis of Physical, Intellectual and Spiritual. Multicultural Islamic Educ Rev 2(2):85\u0026ndash;96\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSanvictores T, Mendez MD (2024) Types of Parenting Styles and Effects on Children. StatPearls Publishing\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSharma S, Gupta B (2023) Investigating the role of technostress, cognitive appraisal and coping strategies on students' learning performance in higher education: a multidimensional transactional theory of stress approach. Information Technology People; West Linn 36(2):626\u0026ndash;660\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSheldon E et al (2021) Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: A systematic review with meta-analysis. \u003cem\u003eEpub 2021.\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSimpson J et al (2021) Effects of social security policy reforms on mental health and inequalities: A systematic review of observational studies in high-income countries. Soc Sci Med\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVan Gasse D, Mortelmans D (2020) Social support in the process of household reorganization after divorce. J Social Personal Relationships, 37(6)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXie N (2024) The Effect of Parental Divorce on Child Depression. J Educ Humanit Social Sci 26:602\u0026ndash;607\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYan Y, Gai X (2022) High Achievers from Low Family Socioeconomic Status Families: Protective Factors for Academically Resilient Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(23)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Oxford College of Business, Sri Lanka","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Single-parent families, mental health, academic performance, socio-economic factors, resilience, parental involvement, educational policy","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8791612/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8791612/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe academic success and well-being of students from single-parent families have been widely discussed in education and psychology research, with particular emphasis on the impact of mental health struggles on academic performance. This study conducts a systematic review of existing literature to explore whether students from single-parent families experience genuine mental health challenges that affect their academic outcomes or if mental health concerns are sometimes used as an excuse for poor performance. The research synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2024, focusing on key themes such as mental health and academic achievement, socio-economic barriers, parental involvement, and institutional interventions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe findings reveal that students from single-parent households often face heightened levels of stress, anxiety, and depression, which contribute to lower academic engagement and performance. Socio-economic disadvantages further exacerbate these challenges by limiting access to educational resources, increasing financial burdens, and reducing parental supervision. However, some students demonstrate resilience and academic success despite these obstacles, benefiting from strong coping mechanisms, financial aid programs, and institutional support. Additionally, the study highlights the issue of mental health claims being misused in some cases, leading to concerns over academic accountability and the effectiveness of institutional policies in distinguishing genuine struggles from potential academic disengagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis research has significant implications for educational institutions and policymakers. Schools and universities must balance providing necessary mental health and financial support with ensuring student accountability. Expanding awareness of mental health services, implementing structured parental engagement programs, and strengthening policies that support students from single-parent families can enhance educational equity. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies to better understand the long-term impact of family structure on academic success and mental well-being.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Mental Health Excuses or Genuine Struggles? Understanding the Balance for Students from Single-Parent Families","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-02-09 12:37:25","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8791612/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"1df4b23c-97ae-418d-9c04-8cc44a3d0caf","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 9th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":62350763,"name":"Educational Psychology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-02-09T12:37:25+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-02-09 12:37:25","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8791612","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8791612","identity":"rs-8791612","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}