A Federated and Privacy-Preserving Framework for Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Studies with Mixed-Effects Models

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) increasingly rely on large-scale data integration to achieve the statistical power necessary to detect variants with weak effects. However, genomic data are typically siloed across institutions, and privacy constraints often preclude centralized analysis. While federated learning (FL) offers a viable alternative by enabling cross-site computation without sharing individual-level data, applying mixed models, which are essential for correcting population structure, in a distributed setting remains a challenge in terms of statistical accuracy and computational scalability. Here, we present a federated mixed-model framework for GWAS that achieves high fidelity to centralized analyses while maintaining efficiency at biobank scale. Building on mixed-model theory and distributed optimization, we introduce algorithms for continuous (FedLMM) and binary (FedGLMM) traits that perform parameter estimation and association testing through site-local computation and aggregation of intermediate statistics. Comprehensive simulations spanning varied sample sizes and genomic densities demonstrate that our methods closely mirror centralized benchmarks (fastGWA and fastGWA-GLMM). Effect-size estimates exhibit near-perfect correlation, and over 99% of significant loci are recovered with well-controlled type I error rates. Empirical analyses on ∼100,000 UK Biobank participants further confirm that the framework delivers consistent inference while sustaining high computational performance. This work establishes a practical, open-source, and statistically reliable federated solution for large-scale GWAS, resolving the tension between data privacy and the need for statistical power in modern genomics.
Full text 1,830 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Abstract Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) increasingly rely on large-scale data integration to achieve the statistical power necessary to detect variants with weak effects. However, genomic data are typically siloed across institutions, and privacy constraints often preclude centralized analysis. While federated learning (FL) offers a viable alternative by enabling cross-site computation without sharing individual-level data, applying mixed models, which are essential for correcting population structure, in a distributed setting remains a challenge in terms of statistical accuracy and computational scalability. Here, we present a federated mixed-model framework for GWAS that achieves high fidelity to centralized analyses while maintaining efficiency at biobank scale. Building on mixed-model theory and distributed optimization, we introduce algorithms for continuous (FedLMM) and binary (FedGLMM) traits that perform parameter estimation and association testing through site-local computation and aggregation of intermediate statistics. Comprehensive simulations spanning varied sample sizes and genomic densities demonstrate that our methods closely mirror centralized benchmarks (fastGWA and fastGWA-GLMM). Effect-size estimates exhibit near-perfect correlation, and over 99% of significant loci are recovered with well-controlled type I error rates. Empirical analyses on ∼100,000 UK Biobank participants further confirm that the framework delivers consistent inference while sustaining high computational performance. This work establishes a practical, open-source, and statistically reliable federated solution for large-scale GWAS, resolving the tension between data privacy and the need for statistical power in modern genomics. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0