Metabolic acclimation supports higher aluminium-induced secretion of citrate and malate in an aluminium-tolerant hybrid clone of Eucalyptus

Metabolic acclimation supports higher aluminium-induced secretion of citrate and malate in an aluminium-tolerant hybrid clone of Eucalyptus | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research article Metabolic acclimation supports higher aluminium-induced secretion of citrate and malate in an aluminium-tolerant hybrid clone of Eucalyptus Wannian Li, Patrick M. Finnegan, Qin Dai, Dongqiang Guo, Mei Yang This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-27845/v3 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 06 Jan, 2021 Read the published version in BMC Plant Biology → Version 3 posted 4 You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Abstract Background: Eucalyptus is the main plantation wood species, mostly grown in aluminized acid soils. To understand the response of Eucalyptus clones to aluminum (Al) toxicity, the Al-tolerant Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla clone GL-9 (designated “G9”) and the Al-sensitive E. urophylla clone GL-4 (designated “W4”) were employed to investigate the production and secretion of citrate and malate by roots. Results: Eucalyptus seedlings in hydroponics were exposed to the presence or absence of 4.4 mM Al at pH 4.0 for 24 hours. The protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHM) and anion channel blocker phenylglyoxal (PG) were applied to explore possible pathways involved in organic acid secretion. The secretion of malate and citrate was earlier and greater in G9 than in W4, corresponding to less Al accumulation in G9. The concentration of Al in G9 roots peaked after 1h and decreased afterwards, corresponding with a rapid induction of malate secretion. A time-lag of about 6h in citrate efflux in G9 was followed by robust secretion to support continuous Al-detoxification. Malate secretion alone may alleviate Al toxicity because the peaks of Al accumulation and malate secretion were simultaneous in W4, which did not secrete appreciable citrate. Enhanced activities of citrate synthase (CS) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC), and reduced activities of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), aconitase (ACO) and malic enzyme (ME) were closely associated with the greater secretion of citrate in G9. PG effectively inhibited citrate and malate secretion in both Eucalyptus clones. CHM also inhibited malate and citrate secretion in G9, and citrate secretion in W4, but notably did not affect malate secretion in W4. Conclusions: G9 immediately secrete malate from roots, which had an initial effect on Al-detoxification, followed by time-delayed citrate secretion . Pre-existing anion channel protein first contributed to malate secretion, while synthesis of carrier protein appeared to be needed for citrate excretion. The changes of organic acid concentrations in response to Al can be achieved by enhanced CS and PEPC activities, but was supported by changes in the activities of other enzymes involved in organic acid metabolism. The above information may help to further explore genes related to Al-tolerance in Eucalyptus . Plant Molecular Biology and Genetics Plant Physiology and Morphology Eucalyptus aluminum tolerance citrate malate metabolizing enzymes Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 2 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 3 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 5 1 Background Species of Eucalyptus are typical fast-growing hardwood trees. Their wide planting has had an important impact on the world timber market due to the high yield of lumber. Eucalyptus is naturally adapted to various environmental conditions, including acid soils [1,2]. Thus, Eucalyptus plantations have been established in acidic soils that are widely distributed in tropical and subtropical climate zones, including in south China. However, it is widely recognized that Al 3+ is solubilized into the soil solution and is rhizotoxic to plants when soil pH is below 5.0 [3]. Thus, it is of great interest that acid soils caused no reduction in Eucalyptus productivity [2]. Various strategies have evolved in higher plants to alleviate Al phytotoxicity, ranging from external repulsion mechanisms to i nternal endurance mechanisms [4–6]. Aluminium-induced production of organic acids is considered to be one of the key tolerance mechanisms for detoxifying both internal and external Al [7, 8]. The accumulation of Al in root tips usually leads to rapid inhibition of root growth within minutes to hours by affecting the absorption of nutrients and disrupting other physiological processes [9]. Several studies have suggested that species of Eucalyptus have higher tolerance to Al toxicity than other tree species such as Quercus robur , Pinus radiata and Melaleuca cajuputi , and may even benefit from low concentrations of Al [10–12]. Moreover, species of E ucalyptus and their clones vary in their Al tolerance and response to Al in acidic environments [12–17]. As in other plants, the exudation of low molecular weight organic acids from the roots of several species or genotypes of Eucalyptus may be an important determinant for Al tolerance and may allow Eucalyptus to grow and yield well in acidic soils [13, 18, 19]. In recent years, asexual hybrid clones of fast-growing E ucalyptus have been the main source of high-yielding plantation stock. Knowledge of the role of organic acids in Al-tolerance of these superior hybrid clones grown in aluminized acidic soils is limited and needs further elucidation. Citrate and malate are the main Al-chelating organic acids that confer tolerance to Al in plants. The types of organic acids and their transportation pathways that are induced by Al vary among different plant species and genotypes [20]. Aluminium-activated organic acid secretion is driven by passive outward movement down a concentration gradient that requires anion channels. In some crops, the activity of organic acid anion channels were more rapidly induced in Al-tolerant genotypes than in sensitive genotypes [21]. This rapid induction of organic acid secretion is mainly due to pre-existing membrane-localized anion channel proteins encoded by ALMT (Al-activated malate transporter) or MATE (Al-activated citrate transporter) genes [22, 23]. When there is a time delay in Al-induced organic acid secretion, new proteins involved in organic acid secretion can be synthesized within hours [2, 24]. Sawaki et al. [1] showed that in Eucalyptus camaldulensis citrate excretion through citrate-transporting EcMATE proteins was an important Al-tolerance mechanism. However, more work is needed on Al-induced secretion of organic acids from the root to determine whether there are other key components that may impact on the secretion process. Low molecular weight organic acids involved in tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, such as citrate and malate, are mainly synthesized in mitochondria. The synthesis and secretion of Al 3 + -induced organic acids are affected by changing activities of enzymes involved in Organic Anion (OA) metabolism and altering expression of corresponding genes [25], but these effects vary depending on plant species and genotype. In soybean, a cytosolic malic enzyme (ME) encoded by GmME1 contributed to increased internal malate and citrate concentrations and their efflux, conferring higher Al resistance [26]. In alfalfa, overexpression of genes encoding citrate synthase (CS) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH) led to increased concentrations and exudation of citrate and malate, and increased Al resistance [27]. Thus, increasing enzyme activities related to increasing malate and citrate production are effective in conferring Al tolerance to plants. In previous research, we determined that Eucalyptus hybrid E. grandis × E. urophylla GL-9 (designated G9 here) was more Al-tolerant than E. urophylla GL-4 (designated W4 here) [28–30]. Lima et al. [16] reported that E. grandis possessed higher Al-tolerance than E. platyphylla due to a minor increase in reactive oxygen species and fewer alterations to stress indicators when exposed to high Al. We concluded that E. grandis × E. urophylla was more Al-tolerant than E. urophylla based on the low level induction of physiological antioxidant indicators [29]. Based on these results, we inferred that hybridization contributed to Al-tolerance in E. grandis × E. urophylla , and provided it with the ability to acclimate to the acidic soils found throughout south China. Based on previous identification of organic acids secreted by E ucalyptus roots [2,13,18,19], we hypothesized that citrate would be the main organic acid involved in Al detoxification in G9, and that malate may not have an important role. In addition to expecting higher CS activity in Al-tolerant G9 than W4, we also hypothesized that changes in other enzymatic activities associated with OA metabolism would support an increase in citrate accumulation. Such metabolic acclimations would provide further information to support strategies to increase Al tolerance in Eucalyptu s and would be expected to be applicable to other species. 2 Results 2.1 Accumulation of Al in roots of Eucalyptus Treatment with Al over a 24 h time course caused significantly higher Al concentrations in root tips of both G9 and W4 genotypes compared to the absence of Al (Fig. 1). The Al concentration peaked at 1 h in G9 root tips, and then declined by about 65% over the remainder of the time course. In W4 root tips, the Al concentration rose more rapidly than in G9 and continued to increase until around 6 h, after which it declined somewhat. The Al concentration was higher in W4 root tips than in G9 root tips at all points of the time course. The lower accumulation of Al in G9 root tips indicated that the degree of Al exclusion differed between the two Eucalyptus clones that had differential tolerance to Al. This result was similar to that in our previous study on Al accumulation in 7-month-old soil-grown E ucalyptus seedlings exposed to Al for 4 months. The Al concentration in roots, stems and leaves of G9 was lower than those of W4 [31]. Taken together, these results suggested that G9 may have a greater ability to exclude Al from the interior of the root by chelating Al around its rhizosphere, thereby reducing Al absorption. 2.2 Al-induced secretion of organic acids from roots of Eucalyptus The Al-inducible malate and citrate secretion from roots was compared between the contrasting clones over a 24 h time course (Fig. 2). The amount of malate secreted from roots was generally lower for each clone than the amount of citrate secreted in both the non-Al-treated controls (CK) and the Al-treated plants. Clone G9 had a higher level of organic acid secretion than W4 at all time points after the start of the Al exposure. The accumulation of malate in G9 peaked around 1 h after exposure to Al and then decreased gradually, but was still more than 2-fold higher than the concentration in the absence of Al after 24 h. (Fig. 2A). In clone W4, by contrast, the accumulation of malate reached its maximum after 6 h of Al treatment. The maximum in W4 was only about 60% of that in G9. Citrate accumulation for G9 was activated after 3 h of Al exposure and peaked by 6 h, while there was no significant change in citrate accumulation in W4 through 24 h (Fig. 2B). These results indicated that the secretion mechanisms of these two organic acids differed between the tolerant and sensitive genotypes of E ucalyptus . 2.3 Effect of inhibitors on organic acid secretion by Eucalyptus clones with contrasting Al tolerance To investigate the secretory pathways for citrate and malate from roots after Al treatment, the anion-channel inhibitor phenyglyoxal (PG) and the protein-synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHM) were added at the start of a 24-h Al treatment (Fig. 3). Phenyglyoxal fully inhibited Al-induced malate secretion in both G9 and W4. In fact, PG also inhibited the non-Al-inducible secretion of malate in G9 to the same low background level observed in W4. The impact of CHM treatment on malate secretion in G9 was similar to that seen for PG treatment. However, CHM had no effect on the Al-induced secretion of malate in W4. The Al-induced secretion of citrate in both G9 and W4 was inhibited by CHM to the same low level, which was below the level of citrate secretion in the absence of Al. 2.4 Organic acid concentrations in root tips of Eucalyptus clones with contrasting Al tolerance No significant differences were found in the internal concentrations of malate or citrate in root tips in the absence of Al (Fig. 4). After 24-h exposure to Al, the citrate and malate concentrations in G9 increased by about 50% and 25%, respectively, compared to the control. Thus, G9 root tips acclimated to Al stress by accumulating citrate and malate, which then allowed their secretion to the outside of the root. Meanwhile, the concentration of malate in W4 root tips upon exposure to Al decreased by about 70%, but no change was observed for citrate. The presence of PG or CHM significantly inhibited the accumulation of both malate and citrate in the root tips of both clones to below the level observed in the absence of Al. The inhibition in Al-induced accumulation of the organic acids was over 90% in all cases except for the inhibition of malate accumulation in W4, which was 76% from a lower starting level. 2.5 Activities of acid-metabolizing enzymes in root tips of Eucalyptus clones with contrasting Al tolerance The activities of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC), MDH, ME, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), aconitase (ACO) and CS were examined in root tips of plants exposed to Al and inhibitors (Fig. 5). PEPC, MDH and ME are important enzymes associated with the metabolism of malate. In the absence of Al, the activity of PEPC was higher in root tips of G9 than of W4. There was a significant increase in PEPC activity in root tips of both clones after Al treatment, but the activity was below non-treated control levels when either PG or CHM were included in the Al treatment. In G9, the addition of inhibitors resulted in 80% lower PEPC activity compared to the addition of Al alone. MDH and ME activities were significantly lower in G9 after Al treatment than in the absence of Al treatment, as was the activity of ME in W4. In contrast, the activity of MDH in W4, which was already as low as in Al-treated G9, was unaffected by Al treatment. Interestingly, compared with the treatment with Al alone, the activity of MDH in G9 increased significantly after the addition of both PG and CHM, while the activity of MDH in W4 and ME in both clones remained unchanged by the addition of these inhibitors. IDH, ACO and CS are closely associated with citric acid metabolism. Compared to the non-Al treatment, IDH and ACO activities in W4 root tips exposed to Al were significantly higher, while CS activity was unchanged. In contrast, in root tips of Al-treated G9, IDH activity was unchanged, ACO activity was much lower and CS activity was 2-fold higher than in the absence of Al treatment. The increased activity of CS may be one of the main reasons for the higher Al-induced accumulation and secretion of citrate in G9. Both PG and CHM had no impact on the low activity of IDH in root tips of Al-treated G9, but repressed the Al-induced increase in CS activity and relieved the Al-induced loss of ACO activity. In Al-treated W4 root tips, the two inhibitors abolished the Al-induced increase in IDH and ACO, and lowered the CS activity to below that in the untreated control. 3 Discussion 3.1 An Al-tolerant Eucalyptus hybrid clone has enhanced accumulation and exudation of malate and citrate The available evidence indicates that the Al-induced secretion of organic acids from roots may lead to the detoxification of Al in higher plants [32, 33]. A role for organic acids leading to Al tolerance in Eucalyptus has been observed previously [12, 18, 19]. The lower root tip concentration of Al coupled with the higher root secretion of citrate and malate in Al-tolerant E. grandis × E. urophylla clone G9 than that in Al-sensitive E. urophylla clone W4 suggested that secretion of these two organic acids was involved in the increased tolerance to Al in G9. This trait was consistent with the results reported for Al-tolerant E. camaldulensis [12, 18, 34]. Tahara et al. [12] documented in E. camaldulensis that citrate had the strongest capacity to bind Al among citrate, oxalate, malate and phosphate. Thus, it was likely that the Al-stimulated accumulation and secretion of citrate was the main underlying mechanism contributing to detoxification of Al by Eucalyptus roots, particularly in Al-tolerant genotypes. However, Silva et al. [19] put forward the hypothesis that Al tolerance was due to the internal detoxification of Al by complexation with malate. These conflicting conclusions left the role of malate in E ucalyptus tolerance unclear. Adding to the complexity, the types of organic acids produced and released in response to Al may vary among Eucalyptus species [34], as do the quantities, as shown here for malate and citrate. The features of malate and citrate accumulation and secretion in Al-tolerant hybrid clone G9 and Al-sensitive parental clone W4 have provided further clues for the identification Al-induced genes or proteins. 3.2 Newly synthesized carrier proteins involved in citrate secretion, but malate secretion facilitated by a pre-existing anion channel in E. grandis × E. urophylla A rapid release of organic acid in response to exposure to Al would suggest that pre-existing anion transporters on the plasma membrane quickly initiated organic acid secretion without the need to produce new proteins; however, a lag in the release of organic acids could indicate that gene expression and/or protein synthesis was required [33, 35, 36]. There was no significant delay in malate secretion by G9, followed by an increase in the secretion of citrate after a lag period of more than 3 h. In contrast, in W4, there was a lag of more than an hour after Al exposure before malate secretion became apparent, while Al exposure did not induce the production or secretion of citrate. Thus, 24 h after exposure to Al, the synthesis and secretion of malate and citrate by G9 was much greater than in W4. Both PG and CHM significantly reduced the Al-induced secretion and internal concentration of citrate in roots of both Eucalyptus clones as well as the malate concentration in G9. However, CHM had no impact on malate secretion in W4, indicating that there are different pathways operating for citrate and malate secretion in response to Al in the two clones. Generally, Al-tolerant species or genotypes had stronger induction and higher quantities of carrier proteins on membranes inside root cells and anion channel proteins on the plasma membrane of root cells, than Al-sensitive genotypes [37, 38]. If organic acid synthesis and transport require the involvement of newly synthesized carrier proteins, an obvious lag of several hours before secretion would be apparent, while pre-existing anion channel proteins would allow organic acids to be secreted out of the root more quickly [39, 40]. Therefore, in G9, it seems likely that pre-existing anion channel proteins facilitated the immediate secretion of malate, while a new carrier protein apparently had to be produced before citrate could be transported out of the roots. Anion channel proteins, such as ALMT and MATE/AACT, are localized to the plasma membrane of root cells and transport their substrates to rapidly facilitate organic acid release at phytotoxic concentrations of Al 3+ [41, 42]. Furthermore, numerous genes encoding OA transporters have been found to increase OA secretion and to be involved in Al detoxification [43,44]. Sawaki et al. [1] reported that Al-induced excretion of citrate by E. camaldulensis roots was associated with higher expression of EcMATE on the plasma membrane, and that the ectopic expression of EcMATE in tobacco hairy roots enhanced Al-responsive citrate excretion, providing further insight into the molecular mechanism underlying Al resistance in Eucalyptus and the potential for genetic improvement of Eucalyptus . However, other components remain to be revealed, particularly the new protein-coding genes and their functions in organic acid synthesis and transport. For instance, the delay in citrate secretion found in G9 was likely due to the need to produce new proteins involved in the synthesis and delivery of citric acid. For W4, there was no change in citrate secretion in response to exposure to Al, while malate secretion was delayed and did not reach its maximum level for 6 h. Moreover, CHM had no effect on the secretion of malate, but did inhibit its accumulation, indicating that W4 does not lack the capacity to release malate, but rather was restricted in its ability to produce malate. Increasing organic acids exudation may not be the only effective way to enhance Al resistance of Eucalyptus . We speculate that other organic substances might be involved in detoxifying Al in some Eucalyptus genotypes. A consequence of Al tolerance in Eucalyptus was the maintenance of nutrients and photosynthesis [17,45]. A new low-molecular-weight Al-binding ligand from roots, oenothein b, contributed to Al tolerance in E. camaldulensis [12,46]. In addition, a number of allelochemicals were detected in E. grandis roots and soil by GC-MS [47,48]. Many of these chemicals are involved in either primary or secondary plant metabolism and plant defense processes [49]. These process may interfere with the secretion of low molecular organic acids, or their products may form complexes with Al. For example, one study found that phenolic compounds could be involved in Al detoxification forming strong complexes with Al ions in the cytoplasm of woody plants including E. viminalis Labill. [50]. In addition, transcriptome analysis has revealed that genes associated with flavonoid and phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathways have key roles in the response of roots of Cunninghamia lanceolata (lamb.) hook. to Al [51]. All these findings encourage further research to identify compounds and the related genes that confer Al tolerance to hybrid clones of Eucalyptus , including the contributions made by allelopathic compounds and other root exudates. 3.3 Secretion and accumulation of citrate and malate in hybrid clone E. grandis × E. urophylla GL-9 were closely linked with changes in CS and PEPC activities We observed that CS and PEPC activities in root tips of both clones were markedly induced by Al, while ME activity was significantly decreased. Together, these changes likely contribute to the increased biosynthesis of organic acids by feeding carbon skeletons into the TCA cycle [52]. The balance between synthesis or catabolism of Al-induced citrate and malate was regulated by shifts in activities of various metabolic enzymes that together contributed to accumulation of these organic acids to increase Al tolerance in Eucalyptus . Additionally, the addition of inhibitors (PG and CHM) directly or indirectly caused changes in enzyme activities involved in organic acid metabolism. In the case of E. urophylla clone W4, decreased ME activity may play a greater role in the lower accumulation of malate upon exposure to Al, since MDH activity was unchanged. Meanwhile, the activities of ACO and IDH were significantly increased by Al exposure, which may underlie the lack of an increase in citrate. In E. grandis × E. urophylla clone G9, increased synthesis and secretion of malate seemed to be supported by decreased ME and MDH activity to prevent malate metabolism. We speculate that genes encoding ME may contribute to increased internal malate and citrate concentrations, leading to exudation of these organic acids to confer higher Al resistance, as in soybean [26]. CS is typically regarded as the main enzyme necessary to increase synthesis and secretion of citrate in roots of Al-tolerant plants, such as rye [53], Paraserianthes facataria [54], and soybean [55]. Moreover, transcript levels specifying CS, ALMT and MATE in the root apex of an Al-tolerant cultivar of alfalfa were higher than in an Al-sensitive cultivar [27]. However, Ikka et al. [34] found that the Al-induced increase in citrate concentration in roots of E. camaldulensis was not due to increased CS activity, but was dependent on reduced ACO activity, which would suppress citrate catabolism . Recently, Teng et al. [56] reported that CS, PEPC and IDH may play important roles in organic acid biosynthesis and degradation in Eucalyptus. Our study indicated that the increased synthesis and secretion of citrate that contributed to increase Al-tolerance in E. grandis × E. urophylla was likely achieved by increasing the activities of PEPC and CS, and decreasing the activity of ACO. These three enzymes may be involved in creating the balance between the secretion of malate and citrate in the roots of plants exposed to Al. From the above, it is clear that key enzymes regulating OA synthesis and exudation vary among of E ucalyptus genotypes. Alterations in the expression of the corresponding genes can affect OA synthesis and exudation resulting in changes in Al tolerance [57]. Some effort has been made in plants to increase the expression of enzymes such as PEPC, CS and MDH by introducing genes encoding these enzymes, for example, in tobacco, alfalfa and canola. Overexpression of these genes would be expected to increase organic acid metabolism and may produce a new citrate synthesis pathway that would contribute to increased Al tolerance in transgenic plants [58-60]. For example, in transgenic canola, overexpression of a CS gene not only led to increased citrate synthesis and exudation, but also changed malate metabolism, which may improve tolerance to Al toxicity [57,61,62]. Since previous studies have indicated that the synthesis of organic acids could be increased by regulating the expression of genes encoding enzymes involved in OA synthesis or transporters involved in OA secretion, transgenic approaches can be expected to provide higher Al tolerance in plants, including Eucalyptus . 4 Conclusion It appears that both citrate and malate contributed to Al tolerance in Eucalyptus and that both accumulation and secretion of these organic acids were involved in Al detoxification. The superior performance of hybrid clone E. grandis × E. urophylla for high yield on aluminized acidic soils was closely associated with increased capacity to release both citrate and malate. Citrate had a more important role in the response to Al in E. grandis × E. urophylla than in E. urophylla . In addition, PG and CHM treatments indicated that both anion channel proteins and increased carrier protein synthesis were involved in Al-induced secretion of citrate in Al-tolerant E. grandis × E. urophylla , but the secretory pathway for malate remained unclear. The enhanced activities of CS and PEPC and the reduced activities of IDH, ACO and ME contributed to Al-induced accumulation and secretion of citrate and malate, demonstrating that metabolic adaptations are associated with Al-tolerance in E. grandis × E. urophylla . More effort is needed to identify and isolate the genes associated with organic acid transport in Eucalyptus , or introduce exogenous genes to make specific enzymes overexpressed and have high activity, further advance Al-tolerance in superior hybrids of Eucalyptus . Meanwhile, other compounds which could be involved in Al detoxification also need further investigation and elucidation of their regulatory mechanism. 5 Methods 5.1 Plant material Two clones of E ucalyptus , Al-tolerant E. grandis × E. urophylla GL-9 (Voucher number: 桂S-SC-EGU-023-2011; designated G9) and Al-sensitive E. urophylla GL-4 (Voucher number: 桂S-SC-EU-022-2011; designated W4) were used in this study. Two-month-old seedlings from culture were provided by the Guangxi Forestry Research Institute, Nanning, China. Guo Dongqiang, a senior engineer and researcher formally identified the two clones [see Additional files 1, 2 and 3]. Seedlings of similar appearance and size were placed in 2L plastic buckets containing nutrient solution with 10 seedlings per bucket. All solutions were prepared with deionized water. For acclimating plants to the hydroponic culture system before Al treatment, seedlings were pre-cultured in 20% nutrient solution, pH 5.0 for 3 days, then in 50% nutrient solution, pH 4.5 for a further 3 days. Acclimated seedlings were transferred to 100% nutrient solution, pH 4.0 for 7 days. The composition of 100% nutrient solution was 6 mM KNO 3 , 5 mM Ca(NO 3 ) 2 , 1 mM MgSO 4 , 2 mM NH 4 H 2 PO 4 , 20 μM Fe-EDTA, 31.25 µM H 3 BO 3 , 2 μM MnCl 2 , 2 μM ZnSO 4 , 0.5 μM CuSO 4 and 0.065 μM (NH 4 ) 6 Mo 7 O 24 . The pH was adjusted with 2 mM HCl. All nutrient solutions were renewed every 2 days. Prior to solution replacement, seedlings were sterilized with 0.1% (v/v) carbendazim for 20 min to inhibit microorganisms. Air pumps were used to continuously aerate the seedlings in hydroponics at 50 L air h -1 . 5.2 Aluminum and inhibitor treatments After 7 days of culture in complete nutrient solution, pH 4.0, seedlings were transferred to 2L fresh nutrient solution, pH 4.0, supplemented with or lacking 4.44 mM Al 3+ from AlCl 3 •6H 2 O with ten seedlings per pot. Each treatment was carried out in triplicate (3×10 plants). The growth solution and roots were harvested from three pots at 0.5 h, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h from the start of exposure to Al 3+ . The internal concentration of citrate and malate and their concentration in the growth medium were determined at these time points. The activities of organic acid-metabolizing enzymes inside root tips were determined after 24 h of Al treatment. To identify potential factors involved in organic acid secretion, the impact of the protein synthesis inhibitor CHM, and the anion channel blocker PG were determined by cultivating the seedlings as above in solutions supplemented with 0.5 mg L -1 CHM and 0.5 mg L -1 PG with 0 or 4.44 mM Al 3+ for 24 h. The secretion of citrate and malate from the roots was determined after 24 h. 5.3 Determination of organic acids in root exudates Samples were prepared following the methods of Wang et al. [63], with some modifications. The collected hydroponics solution was filtered through a mixed fiber membrane to obtain 50 mL filtrate. The filtrate was passed through a cation exchange column (15 mm×11 cm, 5 g Amerlite IR-120 resin), followed by an anion exchange column (2 g Dowex 1-X8 resin). The organic acids bound to the anion exchange column were eluted with 2 M HCl. The eluent was condensed to dryness at 40℃ by rotary evaporation (R215, Buchi, Switzerland). The dried eluent was re-dissolved into 1 mL of Milli-Q water, and filtered (0.45 μm membrane filter). The filtered solution was analyzed for citrate and malate using ion chromatography (ICS-5000 Ion Chromatography system with 4×250 mm AS11-HC analytical column and 4× 50 mm AS11-HC guard column, Dionex, USA). 5.4 Analysis of malate and citrate in root tips Harvested roots were rinsed with Milli-Q water to remove the hydroponics solution. The distal 2 cm containing the root apices were excised to extract and assay the internal concentration of citrate and malate following the methods of Dong et al. [64] and Tahara et al. [12] with some modifications. A total weight of 0.2 g for each sample was ground under liquid nitrogen before adding 1.5 mL ice-cold 4% (v/v) HClO 4 into the powder and gently homogenizing. The mixture was thawed slowly on ice into a suspension and allowed to stand for 30 min, followed by centrifugation at 20,000×g at 4°C for 10 min. The supernatant was passed through an ion exchange column (l5mm × 11cm) filled with cation exchange resin (Amerlite IR-120 resin, H + form, USA) to remove cations, and was then passed through the a pretreatment column (RP18 column, Dionex, USA) to absorb plant pigments. The extracted malate and citrate in roots were determined by ICS as described above. 5.5 Determination of Al in root tips Roots were rinsed with Milli-Q water three times. The 3 cm at root apices were excised and dried at 80°C before grinding to a fine powder. Powdered root tips (100 mg) were digested in 10 mL HNO 3 : HClO 4 (5 : 1 v/v) until the solution was clear. The digest was diluted to 25 mL with Milli-Q water and the Al concentration in the solution was immediately determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (5100 ICP- OES, Agilent Technologies, USA). 5.6 Activity measurement of organic acid-metabolizing enzymes After plants were cultured for 24 h in the presence or absence of Al, the activities of PEPC, MDH, CS, NADP-dependent IDH, NADP-dependent NADP-ME and ACO were measured. Based on the methods of Chen et al. [65] and Yu et al. [38], 200 mg of fresh root apices were homogenized in ice-cold extraction buffer containing 50 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl 2 , 5 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1% (w/v) PVPP(cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone) and 5 mM dithiothreitol. After clarification by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C, the supernatant was used for enzyme activity determination. The activities were measured in a 3 mL reaction mixture using spectrophotometric assays described by Jenner et al. [66], Chen et al. [65] and Ikka et al. [34]. The activities of all enzymes were determined at 340 nm, except CS activity was determined at 412 nm. 5.7 Data analysis Each treatment was done with three biological replicates of 10 plants each. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software package. All data between different treatments was compared using one-way analysis of variance with LSD test and significant differences between the means of two treatments were determined using the Duncan test at P ≤ 0.05. Abbreviations CHM: cycloheximide; PG: phenylglyoxal; CS: citrate synthase; PEPC: phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; IDH: NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase; ACO: aconitase; ME: NADP-dependent malic enzyme; ALMT: Al-activated malate transporter; MATE: Al-activated citrate transporter; TCA: tricarboxylic acid; OA: Organic Anion; MDH: malate dehydrogenase; CK: control check; AACT: Aluminum-activated citrate transporter; EDTA: ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid; NADP: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; PVPP: crosslinked polyvinylpyrrolidone; DTT: Dithiothreitol. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Availability of data and materials The datasets used and analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Competing interests The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Funding This research was supported by grants from Guangxi Specific Grant for Innovation-driven Development Projects (AA17204087-6) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31070560 and 31260176). We thank the Foundation of Economic Support. The funding organizations provided the financial support to the research projects, but were not involved in the design of the study, data collection, analysis of the data, or the writing of the manuscript. Authors ' contributions WNL, QD and MY conceived and designed the research. WNL and QD collected, analyzed the data, and prepared the manuscript. GDQ cultured the Eucalyptus seedling and assisted in the determinations. MY and PMF discussed the results and revised the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the manuscript. Acknowledgements We thank Guangxi Forestry Research Institute for providing the clonal Eucalyptus seedlings used in this study. Authors' information 1 Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, PR China. 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Western Australia, Australia. 3 Guangxi Forestry Research Institute, Nanning 530002, Guangxi, PR China. References Sawaki Y, Kihara-Doi T, Kobayashi Y, Nishikubo N, Kawazu T, Kobayashi Y, et al. Characterization of Al-responsive citrate excretion and citrate-transporting MATEs in Eucalyptus camaldulensis. 2013;237:979–989. Ye SM, Wen YG, Yang M, Liang HW. Correlation analysis on biodiversity and soil physical& chemical properties of Eucalyptus spp. Plantations under Successive Rotation. J Soil Water Conserv. 2010;24:246– Kinraide TB. Identity of the rhizotoxic aluminium species. Plant Soil. 1991;134:167– Kochian L V, Hoekenga OA, Piñeros MA. How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:459– Brunner I, Sperisen C. Aluminum exclusion and aluminum tolerance in woody plants. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:1– Xu QS, Wang Y, Ding ZT, Song LB, Li YS, Ma DX, et al. Aluminum induced metabolic responses in two tea cultivars. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;101:162– Barceló J, Poschenrieder C. Fast root growth responses, root exudates, and internal detoxification as clues to the mechanisms of aluminium toxicity and resistance: A review. Environ Exp Bot. 2002;48:75– Kikui S, Sasaki T, Osawa H, Matsumoto H, Yamamoto Y. Malate enhances recovery from aluminum-caused inhibition of root elongation in wheat. Plant Soil. 2007;290:1– Poschenrieder C, Gunsé B, Corrales I, Barceló A glance into aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants. Sci Total Environ. 2008;400:356–368. Huang JH, Bachelard EP. Effects of aluminium on growth and cation uptake in seedlings of Eucalyptus mannifera and Pinus radiata. Plant Soil. 1993;149:121– Álvarez E, Fernández-Marcos ML, Monterroso C, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ. Application of aluminium toxicity indices to soils under various forest species. For Ecol Manage. 2005;211:227– Tahara K, Norisada M, Yamanoshita T, Kojima K. Role of aluminum-binding ligands in aluminum resistance of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Melaleuca cajuputi. Plant Soil. 2008;302:175– Tahara K, Norisada M, Hogetsu T, Kojima K. Aluminum tolerance and aluminum-induced deposition of callose and lignin in the root tips of Melaleuca and Eucalyptus species . J For Res. 2005;10:325– Tahara K, Hashida K, Otsuka Y, Ohara S, Kojima K, Shinohara K. Identification of a hydrolyzable tannin, oenothein B, as an Aluminum-detoxifying ligand in a highly aluminum-resistant tree, Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Plant Physiol. 2014;164:683– De Alcântara BK, Pizzaia D, Piotto FA, Borgo L, Brondani GE, Azevedo RA. Temporal dynamics of the response to al stress in Eucalyptus Grandis × Eucalyptus Camaldulensis. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2015;87:1063– Lima MDR, Barbosa MAM, Batista BL, Lobato AK da S. Biochemical responses of two species of Eucalyptus exposed to aluminium toxicity: Oxidative stress and antioxidant metabolism. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj-Napoca. 2016;44:107– Silva LFF, Lima MDR, Lima EJA, Castro ARS, Barros Junior UO, Lobato AKS. Differential behaviours in two species of Eucalyptus exposed to aluminium. Indian J Plant Physiol. 2017;22:107– Nguyen NT, Nakabayashi K, Thompson J, Fujita K. Role of exudation of organic acids and phosphate in aluminum tolerance of four tropical woody species. Tree Physiol. 2003;23:1041– Silva IR, Novais RF, Jham GN, Barros NF, Gebrim FO, Nunes FN, et al. Responses of eucalypt species to aluminum: The possible involvement of low molecular weight organic acids in the Al tolerance mechanism. Tree Physiol. 2004;24:1267– Eldhuset TD, Swensen B, Wickstrøm T, Wollebæk G. Organic acids in root exudates from Picea abies seedlings influenced by mycorrhiza and aluminum. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2007;170:645– Kopittke PM, McKenna BA, Karunakaran C, Dynes JJ, Arthur Z, Gianoncelli A, et al. Aluminum complexation with malate within the root apoplast differs between aluminum resistant and sensitive wheat lines. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1– Sasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Ezaki B, Katsuhara M, Ahn SJ, Ryan PR, et al. A wheat gene encoding an aluminum-activated malate transporter. Plant J. 2004;37:645– Furukawa J, Yamaji N, Wang H, Mitani N, Murata Y, Sato K, et al. An aluminum-activated citrate transporter in barley. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48:1081– Yang JL, Zheng SJ, He YF, You JF, Zhang L, Yu XH. Comparative studies on the effect of a protein-synthesis inhibitor on aluminium-induced secretion of organic acids from Fagopyrum esculentum Moench and Cassia tora L. roots. Plant, Cell Environ. 2006;29:240– Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Jones DL. Function and mechanism of organic anion exudation from plant roots. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001;52:27– Zhou Y, Yang ZM, Xu YZ, Sun HR, Sun ZT, Lin B, et al. Soybean NADP-malic enzyme functions in malate and citrate metabolism and contributes to their efflux under Al stress. Front Plant Sci. 2018;8:1– Sun GL, Zhu HF, Wen SL, Liu LS, Gou LM, Guo ZF. Citrate synthesis and exudation confer Al resistance in alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L. ). Plant Soil. 2020;449:319– Yang M, Huang SX, Fang SZ, Huang XL. Response of seedling growth of four Eucalyptus clones to acid and aluminum. Plant Nutr Fertil Sci. 2011;17:195– Yang M, Wu YM, Huang SX, Huang XL. Resistance physiological response of different fast- growing Eucalyptus clones to acid- aluminum stresses. 2011;47:181– Yang M, Tan L, Xu YY, Zhao YH, Cheng F, Ye SM, et al. Effect of low pH and aluminum toxicity on the photosynthetic characteristics of different fast-growing Eucalyptus vegetatively propagated clones. PLos One. 2015;10:1– Yang M, Cao XN, Wu YM, Huang XL. Effect of acid aluminum on absorption of Al and N,P,K in Eucalyptus Clones with different aluminum tolerance. Southwest China Jounal Agric Sci. 2012;25:1061– Ma JF. Physiological mechanisms of Al resistance in higher plants. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2005;51:609– Ma JF. Role of organic acids in detoxification of aluminum in higher plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000;41:383– Ikka T, Ogawa T, Li D, Hiradate S, Morita A. Effect of aluminum on metabolism of organic acids and chemical forms of aluminum in root tips of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Phytochemistry. 2013;94:142–147. Kollmeier M, Dietrich P, Bauer CS, Horst WJ, Hedrich R. Aluminum activates a citrate-permeable anion channel in the aluminum-sensitive zone of the maize root apex. A comparison between an aluminum- sensitive and an aluminum-resistant cultivar. Plant Physiol. 2001;126:397– Ryan PR, Dong B, Watt M, Kataoka T, Delhaize E. Strategies to isolate transporters that facilitate organic anion efflux from plant roots. Plant Soil. 2003;248:61– Piñeros MA, Magalhaes J V., Carvalho Alves VM, Kochian L V. The physiology and biophysics of an aluminum tolerance mechanism based on root citrate exudation in maize. Plant Physiol. 2002;129:1194– Yu L, Yan J, Guo SR, Zhu WM. Aluminum-induced secretion of organic acid by cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata L. ) roots. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2012;135:52– Li XF, Zuo FH, Ling GZ, Li YY, Yu YX, Yang PQ, et al. Secretion of citrate from roots in response to aluminum and low phosphorus stresses in Stylosanthes . Plant Soil. 2009;325:219– Yang LT, Jiang HX, Tang N, Chen LS. Mechanisms of aluminum-tolerance in two species of citrus: Secretion of organic acid anions and immobilization of aluminum by phosphorus in roots. Plant Sci. 2011;180:521– Collins NC, Shirley NJ, Saeed M, Pallotta M, Gustafson JP. An ALMT1 gene cluster controlling aluminum tolerance at the Alt4 Locus of Rye ( Secale cereale ). Genetics. 2008;179:669–682. Maron LG, Guimarães CT, Kirst M, Albert PS, Birchler JA, Bradbury PJ, et al. Aluminum tolerance in maize is associated with higher MATE1 gene copy number. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:5241– Zhou GF, Delhaize E, Zhou Mx, Ryan PR. The barley MATE gene, HvAACT1, increases citrate efflux and Al(3+) tolerance when expressed in wheat and barley. Annals of Botany, 2013;112(3):603– Ma QB, Yi R, Li L, Liang ZY, Zeng TT, Zhang Y, et al. GsMATE encoding a multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporter enhances aluminum tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana . BMC Plant Biology. 2018;18(1):212. Silva S, Pinto-Carnide O, Martins-Lopes P, Matos M, Guedes-Pinto H, Santos C. Differential aluminium changes on nutrient accumulation and root differentiation in an Al sensitive vs. tolerant wheat. Environ Exp Bot. 2010;68:91– Tahara K, Hiradate S, Hashida K, Shinohara K. An aluminum-resistance mechanism in Eucalyptus camaldulensis: Complexation between aluminum and oenothein B in presence of organic acids in vitro. J For Res. 2017;22:261– Wang HG, Zhang J, Yang WS, Wang XX, Cheng L. A comparative research on the allopathic of Eucalyputs grandis in different woodland. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Natural Science Edition). 2009;31(1): 94– Wang HG, Zhang J, Yang WS, Huang QM, Zou P. A research on the allelopathic substances in root system and roo t system soil of Eucalyptus grandis . Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Natural Science). 2006,29(3): 368– Bertin C, Yang XH, Weston LA. The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere. Plant and Soil, 2003,256(1): 67– Ofei-Manu P, Wagatsuma T, Ishikawa S, Tawaraya K. The plasma membrane strength of the root-tip cells and root phenolic compounds are correiated with Al tolerance in several common woody plants. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2001;47:359– Ma Z, Lin S. Transcriptomic revelation of phenolic compounds involved in aluminum toxicity responses in roots of Cunninghamia lanceolata (lamb.) hook. Genes (Basel). 2019; doi:10.3390/genes10110835. Dong DF, Peng XX, Yan XL. Organic acid exudation induced by phosphorus deficiency and/or aluminium toxicity in two contrasting soybean genotypes. Physiol Plant. 2004;122:190– Li XF, Ma JF, Matsumoto H. Pattern of aluminum-induced secretion of organic acids differs between rye and wheat. Plant Physiol. 2000;123:1537– Osawa H, Kojima K. Citrate-release-mediated aluminum resistance is coupled to the inducible expression of mitochondrial citrate synthase gene in Paraserianthes falcataria . Tree Physiol. 2006;26:565– Xu MY, You JF, Hou NN, Zhang HM, Chen G, Yang ZM. Mitochondrial enzymes and citrate transporter contribute to the aluminium-induced citrate secretion from soybean ( Glycine max ) roots. Funct Plant Biol. 2010;37:285– Teng WC, Kang YH, Hou WJ, Hu HZ, Luo WJ, Wei J, et al. Phosphorus application reduces aluminum toxicity in two Eucalyptus clones by increasing its accumulation in roots and decreasing its content in leaves. PLoS One. 2018;13:1– De La Fuente JM, Ramírez-Rodríguez V, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Herrera-Estrella L. Aluminum tolerance in transgenic plants by alteration of citrate synthesis. Science. 1997;276:1566– Chen ZC, Liao H. Organic acid anions: An effective defensive weapon for plants against aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in acidic soils. Journal of Genetics and Genomics. 2016;43(11):631– Sharma T, Dreyer I, Kochian L, Piñeros MA. The ALMT family of organic acid transporters in plants and their involvement in detoxification and nutrient security. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1488. Tesfaye M, Temple SJ, Allan DL, Vance CP, Samac DA. Overexpression of malate dehydrogenase in transgenic alfalfa enhances organic acid synthesis and confers tolerance to aluminum. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:1836– Ryan PR, Tyerman SD, Sasaki T, Furuichi T, Yamamoto Y, Zhang WH, et al. The identification of aluminium-resistance genes provides opportunities for enhancing crop production on acid soils. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:9– Wang Y, Xu H, Kou JJ, Shi L, Zhang CY, Xu FS. Dual effects of transgenic Brassica napus overexpressing CS gene on tolerances to aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency. Plant Soil. 2013;362:231– Wang P, Zhou R, Cheng JJ, Bi S. LC determination of trace short-chain organic acids in wheat root exudates under aluminum stress. Chromatographia. 2007;66:867– Dong XY, Shen RF, Chen RF, Zhu ZL, Ma JF. Secretion of malate and citrate from roots is related to high Al-resistance in Lespedeza bicolor . Plant Soil. 2008;306:139– Chen LS, Tang N, Jiang HX, Yang LT, Li Q, Smith BR. Changes in organic acid metabolism differ between roots and leaves of Citrus grandis in response to phosphorus and aluminum interactions. J Plant Physiol. 2009;166:2023– Jenner HL, Winning BM, Millar AH, Tomlinson KL, Leaver CJ, Hill SA. NAD malic enzyme and the control of carbohydrate metabolism in potato tubers. Plant Physiol. 2001;126:1139– Additional Files The mentioned Additonal Files are not available with this version: Additional file 1. Certification of superior varieties of forest tree ( Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla ). Additional file 2. Certification of superior varieties of forest tree ( Eucalyptus urophylla ). Additional file 3. Certification of Eucalyptus from Guangxi Forestry Research Institute. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 06 Jan, 2021 Read the published version in BMC Plant Biology → Version 3 posted Editorial decision: Accept 07 Dec, 2020 Editor assigned by journal 06 Dec, 2020 Submission checks completed at journal 06 Dec, 2020 Editor invited by journal 06 Dec, 2020 You are reading this latest preprint version Show more versions Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-27845","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":5989652,"identity":"c420cb91-654b-4daa-8bd7-c8e839d1379a","order_by":0,"name":"Wannian Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"College of Forestry, Guangxi University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Wannian","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""},{"id":5989653,"identity":"920a790e-b57d-4916-9081-400569172659","order_by":1,"name":"Patrick M. Finnegan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"School of Biological Science, University of Western Australia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Patrick","middleName":"M.","lastName":"Finnegan","suffix":""},{"id":5989654,"identity":"ad4b1dff-9204-4546-b961-70259f13e978","order_by":2,"name":"Qin Dai","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"College of Forestry, Guangxi University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Qin","middleName":"","lastName":"Dai","suffix":""},{"id":5989655,"identity":"05f204d0-bacb-4830-95d2-d5fb84d9d5a8","order_by":3,"name":"Dongqiang Guo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Guangxi Forestry Rearch Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dongqiang","middleName":"","lastName":"Guo","suffix":""},{"id":5989656,"identity":"ed1a82d3-1c25-425d-88d3-ebba6a10d6e9","order_by":4,"name":"Mei Yang","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2727-8929","institution":"Guangxi University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mei","middleName":"","lastName":"Yang","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2020-05-08 08:42:07","currentVersionCode":3,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-27845/v3","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-27845/v3","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02788-4","type":"published","date":"2021-01-06T15:02:14+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":4332343,"identity":"6fd4fd49-d3e5-495f-82ea-4ae681e7dbc3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-17 14:18:40","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":57818,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Aluminum concentration in root tips of E. grandis × E. urophylla G9 and E. urophylla W4 at the indicated times after addition of Al. Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P \u003c 0.05. CK, non-Al-treated control; Al, aluminium treated.","description":"","filename":"Fig1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-27845/v3/a6d1f0989d7c7c1efdce799c.png"},{"id":4332354,"identity":"c2a528ce-1527-4b66-bd0d-d9745913325d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-17 14:19:10","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":71859,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Aluminum concentration in root tips of E. grandis × E. urophylla G9 and E. urophylla W4 at the indicated times after addition of Al. Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P \u003c 0.05. CK, non-Al-treated control; Al, aluminium treated.","description":"","filename":"Fig2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-27845/v3/c4f2791f4d8c32802d789a14.png"},{"id":4332348,"identity":"824c0ce3-5dd6-4a3f-a4c4-ab9b55826070","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-17 14:18:46","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":71859,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Aluminum concentration in root tips of E. grandis × E. urophylla G9 and E. urophylla W4 at the indicated times after addition of Al. Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P \u003c 0.05. CK, non-Al-treated control; Al, aluminium treated.","description":"","filename":"Fig2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-27845/v3/e8d75e352b080177074e52bd.png"},{"id":4332344,"identity":"17732197-a003-4873-92b4-d78736eaae10","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-17 14:18:40","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":71859,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Aluminum concentration in root tips of E. grandis × E. urophylla G9 and E. urophylla W4 at the indicated times after addition of Al. Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P \u003c 0.05. CK, non-Al-treated control; Al, aluminium treated.","description":"","filename":"Fig2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-27845/v3/0720628366283b3a5117e0f2.png"},{"id":4332355,"identity":"706c6420-426a-49db-905d-8eae1e46c597","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-17 14:19:10","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":96406,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Malate (A) and citrate (B) secreted from roots of E. grandis × E. urophylla G9 and E. urophylla W4 after 24 hours of exposure to aluminium in the absence or presence of the anion channel inhibitor phenylglyoxyl (PG) or the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHM). Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P \u003c 0.05. CK, non-Al-treated control.","description":"","filename":"Fig3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-27845/v3/4a729a2cb8239dd48ca567aa.png"},{"id":4332349,"identity":"4c180ba4-5cc1-46b0-a97a-a0b02c4e0c61","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-17 14:18:46","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":96406,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Malate (A) and citrate (B) secreted from roots of E. grandis × E. urophylla G9 and E. urophylla W4 after 24 hours of exposure to aluminium in the absence or presence of the anion channel inhibitor phenylglyoxyl (PG) or the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHM). Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P \u003c 0.05. CK, non-Al-treated control.","description":"","filename":"Fig3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-27845/v3/5b404748c0ecbc91f970a081.png"},{"id":4332345,"identity":"1eb0ac63-0c1e-4d54-8a54-4d261f22ccf4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-17 14:18:40","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":96406,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Malate (A) and citrate (B) secreted from roots of E. grandis × E. urophylla G9 and E. urophylla W4 after 24 hours of exposure to aluminium in the absence or presence of the anion channel inhibitor phenylglyoxyl (PG) or the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHM). Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P \u003c 0.05. CK, non-Al-treated control.","description":"","filename":"Fig3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-27845/v3/ab446893c8d9fab89a2d85f7.png"},{"id":4332353,"identity":"b9f29b7f-b678-417b-aa68-89cebedd7fbf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-17 14:19:10","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":52713,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Malate (A) and citrate (B) concentrations in root tips of E. grandis × E. urophylla G9 and E. urophylla W4 after 24 hours treatment with aluminium in the absence or presence of the anion channel inhibitor phenylglyoxyl (PG) or the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHM). Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences at P \u003c 0.05. CK, non-Al-treated control.","description":"","filename":"Fig4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-27845/v3/c519feaeb1af4cdf96a06575.png"},{"id":4332347,"identity":"569e92f1-0b40-467a-8a54-a51516ba708e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-17 14:18:40","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":52713,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Malate (A) and citrate (B) concentrations in root tips of E. grandis × E. urophylla G9 and E. urophylla W4 after 24 hours treatment with aluminium in the absence or presence of the anion channel inhibitor phenylglyoxyl (PG) or the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHM). Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences at P \u003c 0.05. CK, non-Al-treated control.","description":"","filename":"Fig4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-27845/v3/0f5df84e58d9ec44c925bbae.png"},{"id":4332350,"identity":"f1915987-885b-465c-a7e9-eccb39a8373f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-17 14:18:46","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":370132,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Activities of PEPC (A), MDH (B), ME (C), IDH (D), ACO (E) and CS (F) in root tips of E. grandis × E. urophylla G9 and E. urophylla W4 after 24 hours treatment with aluminium in the absence or presence of the anion-channel inhibitor phenylglyoxyl (PG) or the protein-synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHM). Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences at P \u003c 0.05. CK, non-Al-treated control.","description":"","filename":"Fig5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-27845/v3/b797dfa2ce235c7b8ba6d281.png"},{"id":4332346,"identity":"9b864ca7-1187-4811-aeb5-076e57f6acf4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2020-12-17 14:18:40","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":370132,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Activities of PEPC (A), MDH (B), ME (C), IDH (D), ACO (E) and CS (F) in root tips of E. grandis × E. urophylla G9 and E. urophylla W4 after 24 hours treatment with aluminium in the absence or presence of the anion-channel inhibitor phenylglyoxyl (PG) or the protein-synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHM). Bars represent means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences at P \u003c 0.05. CK, non-Al-treated control.","description":"","filename":"Fig5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-27845/v3/400ea155cf27e9394413d343.png"},{"id":15670419,"identity":"31a23bd3-9b1f-477e-a7cd-30b199d02bb9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-11-18 13:59:12","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1736858,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-27845/v3/2315eaa6-df30-44e2-8396-5ef279021d7f.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eMetabolic acclimation supports higher aluminium-induced secretion of citrate and malate in an aluminium-tolerant hybrid clone of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"1 Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eSpecies of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e are typical fast-growing hardwood trees. Their wide planting has had an important impact on the world timber market due to the high yield of lumber. \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e is naturally adapted to various environmental conditions, including acid soils\u0026nbsp;[1,2].\u0026nbsp;Thus,\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eplantations have been\u0026nbsp;established\u0026nbsp;in acidic soils that are\u0026nbsp;widely distributed in\u0026nbsp;tropical and subtropical climate\u0026nbsp;zones, including in south China.\u0026nbsp;However,\u0026nbsp;it is widely recognized that Al\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e is solubilized into the soil solution and is rhizotoxic to plants when soil pH is below 5.0\u0026nbsp;[3]. Thus, it is of great interest that acid soils caused\u0026nbsp;no reduction in \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e productivity\u0026nbsp;[2].\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVarious strategies have evolved in higher plants\u0026nbsp;to alleviate Al phytotoxicity, ranging from\u0026nbsp;external repulsion mechanisms to\u0026nbsp;\u003cstrong\u003ei\u003c/strong\u003enternal\u0026nbsp;endurance mechanisms\u0026nbsp;[4\u0026ndash;6].\u0026nbsp;Aluminium-induced production of organic acids\u0026nbsp;is\u0026nbsp;considered to be one of the key\u0026nbsp;tolerance\u0026nbsp;mechanisms for\u0026nbsp;detoxifying both internal and\u0026nbsp;external Al\u0026nbsp;[7, 8].\u0026nbsp;The accumulation of Al in root tips usually leads to rapid inhibition of root growth within minutes to hours by affecting the absorption of nutrients and disrupting other physiological processes\u0026nbsp;[9].\u0026nbsp;Several studies have suggested that species of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ehave higher\u0026nbsp;tolerance to Al toxicity\u0026nbsp;than other tree species such as\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eQuercus robur\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003ePinus radiata\u003c/em\u003e and\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eMelaleuca cajuputi\u003c/em\u003e, and\u0026nbsp;may even benefit from low concentrations of Al\u0026nbsp;[10\u0026ndash;12]. Moreover, species of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e and their clones\u0026nbsp;vary\u0026nbsp;in their Al tolerance and response to Al in acidic environments\u0026nbsp;[12\u0026ndash;17].\u0026nbsp;As in other plants, the exudation of low molecular weight organic acids from the roots of several species\u0026nbsp;or genotypes\u0026nbsp;of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e may be an important determinant for Al tolerance\u0026nbsp;and may\u0026nbsp;allow\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e to grow and yield\u0026nbsp;well\u0026nbsp;in acidic soils\u0026nbsp;[13, 18, 19].\u0026nbsp;In recent years, asexual hybrid clones of\u0026nbsp;fast-growing \u003cem\u003eE\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ehave been\u0026nbsp;the main source of high-yielding plantation stock.\u0026nbsp;Knowledge\u0026nbsp;of the role of organic acids in\u0026nbsp;Al-tolerance\u0026nbsp;of these\u0026nbsp;superior\u0026nbsp;hybrid clones grown in aluminized acidic soils is limited\u0026nbsp;and needs further elucidation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCitrate and malate are the main Al-chelating organic acids that confer tolerance to Al in plants. The types of organic acids and their\u0026nbsp;transportation pathways that are\u0026nbsp;induced by\u0026nbsp;Al\u0026nbsp;vary\u0026nbsp;among different\u0026nbsp;plant species and\u0026nbsp;genotypes\u0026nbsp;[20].\u0026nbsp;Aluminium-activated organic acid secretion is driven by passive outward movement down a concentration gradient\u0026nbsp;that requires anion channels.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;In some crops, the activity of\u0026nbsp;organic acid\u0026nbsp;anion channels were more rapidly induced in Al-tolerant genotypes than in sensitive genotypes\u0026nbsp;[21].\u0026nbsp;This rapid induction of organic acid secretion is mainly due to pre-existing membrane-localized anion channel proteins\u0026nbsp;encoded by \u003cem\u003eALMT\u003c/em\u003e (Al-activated malate transporter) or \u003cem\u003eMATE\u003c/em\u003e (Al-activated citrate transporter)\u0026nbsp;genes\u0026nbsp;[22, 23].\u0026nbsp;When there is a time delay in Al-induced organic acid secretion,\u0026nbsp;new proteins involved in organic acid secretion can\u0026nbsp;be\u0026nbsp;synthesized within hours\u0026nbsp;[2, 24].\u0026nbsp;Sawaki et al.\u0026nbsp;[1]\u0026nbsp;showed that\u0026nbsp;in\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eEucalyptus camaldulensis\u003c/em\u003e citrate excretion through citrate-transporting EcMATE\u0026nbsp;proteins\u0026nbsp;was\u0026nbsp;an important\u0026nbsp;Al-tolerance mechanism. However, more work is needed on\u0026nbsp;Al-induced secretion of organic acids\u0026nbsp;from the root\u0026nbsp;to\u0026nbsp;determine whether there are other key components that may impact on the secretion process.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLow molecular weight organic acids involved in\u0026nbsp;tricarboxylic acid (TCA)\u0026nbsp;cycle, such as citrate and malate, are mainly synthesized in mitochondria. The synthesis\u0026nbsp;and secretion\u0026nbsp;of\u0026nbsp;Al\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e-induced organic acids\u0026nbsp;are affected\u0026nbsp;by\u0026nbsp;changing\u0026nbsp;activities of enzymes involved in\u0026nbsp;Organic Anion\u0026nbsp;(OA)\u0026nbsp;metabolism\u0026nbsp;and altering\u0026nbsp;expression of corresponding genes\u0026nbsp;[25], but these effects vary\u0026nbsp;depending on plant species and genotype. In soybean, a cytosolic malic enzyme (ME) encoded by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eGmME1\u003c/em\u003e contributed\u0026nbsp;to\u0026nbsp;increased internal malate and citrate concentrations and their efflux,\u0026nbsp;conferring\u0026nbsp;higher Al resistance\u0026nbsp;[26]. In alfalfa,\u0026nbsp;overexpression of genes encoding citrate\u0026nbsp;synthase (CS)\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;malate\u0026nbsp;dehydrogenase (MDH) led to\u0026nbsp;increased concentrations and\u0026nbsp;exudation\u0026nbsp;of\u0026nbsp;citrate\u0026nbsp;and malate,\u0026nbsp;and increased Al resistance\u0026nbsp;[27]. Thus, increasing enzyme activities related to increasing malate and citrate production are effective in conferring Al tolerance to plants.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn previous research, we\u0026nbsp;determined that \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ehybrid\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. grandis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026times;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eGL-9\u0026nbsp;(designated G9 here)\u0026nbsp;was more Al-tolerant than\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eGL-4 (designated W4 here)\u0026nbsp;[28\u0026ndash;30].\u0026nbsp;Lima et al.\u0026nbsp;[16]\u0026nbsp;reported that\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. grandis\u003c/em\u003e possessed higher Al-tolerance\u0026nbsp;than\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eE. platyphylla\u003c/em\u003e due to a minor increase in reactive oxygen species and fewer alterations to stress indicators when exposed to\u0026nbsp;high\u0026nbsp;Al.\u0026nbsp;We concluded\u0026nbsp;that\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. grandis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026times;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ewas more Al-tolerant than\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e based on the low level induction of\u0026nbsp;physiological\u0026nbsp;antioxidant\u0026nbsp;indicators\u0026nbsp;[29].\u0026nbsp;Based on these results, we inferred that hybridization contributed to Al-tolerance in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. grandis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026times;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e, and provided it with the\u0026nbsp;ability to acclimate to the\u0026nbsp;acidic soils found throughout\u0026nbsp;south\u0026nbsp;China.\u0026nbsp;Based on previous identification of\u0026nbsp;organic acids secreted by\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e roots\u0026nbsp;[2,13,18,19], we hypothesized that citrate would be the main organic acid involved in Al detoxification in G9, and that malate may not have an important role. In addition to expecting higher CS activity in Al-tolerant G9 than W4, we also hypothesized that changes in other enzymatic activities associated with OA metabolism would support an increase in citrate accumulation. Such metabolic acclimations would provide further information to support strategies to increase Al tolerance in \u003cem\u003eEucalyptu\u003c/em\u003es and would be expected to be applicable to other species.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2 Results","content":"\u003ch2\u003e2.1\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; Accumulation of Al in roots of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTreatment with Al over a 24 h time course caused significantly higher Al concentrations in root tips of both G9 and W4 genotypes compared to the absence of Al (Fig. 1). The Al concentration peaked at 1 h in G9 root tips, and then declined by about 65% over the remainder of the time course. In W4 root tips, the Al concentration rose more rapidly than in G9 and continued to increase until around 6 h, after which it declined somewhat. The Al concentration was higher in W4 root tips than in G9 root tips at all points of the time course. The lower accumulation of Al in G9 root tips indicated that the degree of Al exclusion differed between the two \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e clones that had differential tolerance to Al. This result was similar to that in our previous study on Al accumulation in 7-month-old soil-grown \u003cem\u003eE\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e seedlings exposed to Al for 4 months. The Al concentration in roots, stems and leaves of G9 was lower than those of W4 [31]. Taken together, these results suggested that G9 may have a greater ability to exclude Al from the interior of the root by chelating Al around its rhizosphere, thereby reducing Al absorption.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e2.2\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; Al-induced secretion of organic acids from roots of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Al-inducible malate and citrate secretion from roots was compared between the contrasting clones over a 24 h time course (Fig. 2). The amount of malate secreted from roots was generally lower for each clone than the amount of citrate secreted in both the non-Al-treated controls (CK) and the Al-treated plants. Clone G9 had a higher level of organic acid secretion than W4 at all time points after the start of the Al exposure. The accumulation of malate in G9 peaked around 1 h after exposure to Al and then decreased gradually, but was still more than 2-fold higher than the concentration in the absence of Al after 24 h. (Fig. 2A). In clone W4, by contrast, the accumulation of malate reached its maximum after 6 h of Al treatment. The maximum in W4 was only about 60% of that in G9. Citrate accumulation for G9 was activated after 3 h of Al exposure and peaked by 6 h, while there was no significant change in citrate accumulation in W4 through 24 h (Fig. 2B). These results indicated that the secretion mechanisms of these two organic acids differed between the tolerant and sensitive genotypes of \u003cem\u003eE\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e2.3\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; Effect of inhibitors on organic acid secretion by \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e clones with contrasting Al tolerance\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo investigate the secretory pathways for citrate and malate from roots after Al treatment, the anion-channel inhibitor phenyglyoxal (PG) and the protein-synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHM) were added at the start of a 24-h Al treatment (Fig. 3). Phenyglyoxal fully inhibited Al-induced malate secretion in both G9 and W4. In fact, PG also inhibited the non-Al-inducible secretion of malate in G9 to the same low background level observed in W4. The impact of CHM treatment on malate secretion in G9 was similar to that seen for PG treatment. However, CHM had no effect on the Al-induced secretion of malate in W4. The Al-induced secretion of citrate in both G9 and W4 was inhibited by CHM to the same low level, which was below the level of citrate secretion in the absence of Al.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e2.4\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; Organic acid concentrations in root tips of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e clones with contrasting Al tolerance\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNo significant differences were found in the internal concentrations of malate or citrate in root tips in the absence of Al (Fig. 4). After 24-h exposure to Al, the citrate and malate concentrations in G9 increased by about 50% and 25%, respectively, compared to the control. Thus, G9 root tips acclimated to Al stress by accumulating citrate and malate, which then allowed their secretion to the outside of the root. Meanwhile, the concentration of malate in W4 root tips upon exposure to Al decreased by about 70%, but no change was observed for citrate. The presence of PG or CHM significantly inhibited the accumulation of both malate and citrate in the root tips of both clones to below the level observed in the absence of Al. The inhibition in Al-induced accumulation of the organic acids was over 90% in all cases except for the inhibition of malate accumulation in W4, which was 76% from a lower starting level.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e2.5\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; Activities of acid-metabolizing enzymes in root tips of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus \u003c/em\u003eclones with contrasting Al tolerance\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe activities of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC), MDH, ME, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), aconitase (ACO) and CS were examined in root tips of plants exposed to Al and inhibitors (Fig. 5). PEPC, MDH and ME are important enzymes associated with the metabolism of malate. In the absence of Al, the activity of PEPC was higher in root tips of G9 than of W4. There was a significant increase in PEPC activity in root tips of both clones after Al treatment, but the activity was below non-treated control levels when either PG or CHM were included in the Al treatment. In G9, the addition of inhibitors resulted in 80% lower PEPC activity compared to the addition of Al alone. MDH and ME activities were significantly lower in G9 after Al treatment than in the absence of Al treatment, as was the activity of ME in W4. In contrast, the activity of MDH in W4, which was already as low as in Al-treated G9, was unaffected by Al treatment. Interestingly, compared with the treatment with Al alone, the activity of MDH in G9 increased significantly after the addition of both PG and CHM, while the activity of MDH in W4 and ME in both clones remained unchanged by the addition of these inhibitors.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIDH, ACO and CS are closely associated with citric acid metabolism. Compared to the non-Al treatment, IDH and ACO activities in W4 root tips exposed to Al were significantly higher, while CS activity was unchanged. In contrast, in root tips of Al-treated G9, IDH activity was unchanged, ACO activity was much lower and CS activity was 2-fold higher than in the absence of Al treatment. The increased activity of CS may be one of the main reasons for the higher Al-induced accumulation and secretion of citrate in G9. Both PG and CHM had no impact on the low activity of IDH in root tips of Al-treated G9, but repressed the Al-induced increase in CS activity and relieved the Al-induced loss of ACO activity. In Al-treated W4 root tips, the two inhibitors abolished the Al-induced increase in IDH and ACO, and lowered the CS activity to below that in the untreated control.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"3 Discussion","content":"\u003ch2\u003e3.1 An Al-tolerant \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ehybrid clone has enhanced accumulation and exudation of malate and citrate\u0026nbsp;\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe available evidence\u0026nbsp;indicates\u0026nbsp;that the Al-induced secretion of\u0026nbsp;organic acids\u0026nbsp;from roots\u0026nbsp;may\u0026nbsp;lead to\u0026nbsp;the\u0026nbsp;detoxification of\u0026nbsp;Al\u0026nbsp;in higher\u0026nbsp;plants\u0026nbsp;[32,\u0026nbsp;33].\u0026nbsp;A role for\u0026nbsp;organic acids\u0026nbsp;leading to Al tolerance in \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e has been observed\u0026nbsp;previously\u0026nbsp;[12, 18, 19].\u0026nbsp;The\u0026nbsp;lower root tip concentration of Al\u0026nbsp;coupled with the\u0026nbsp;higher root secretion\u0026nbsp;of\u0026nbsp;citrate and malate in\u0026nbsp;Al-tolerant\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;E. grandis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026times;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e clone G9\u0026nbsp;than\u0026nbsp;that\u0026nbsp;in Al-sensitive\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;E. urophylla\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eclone\u0026nbsp;W4\u0026nbsp;suggested\u0026nbsp;that\u0026nbsp;secretion of these two\u0026nbsp;organic acids\u0026nbsp;was\u0026nbsp;involved in the increased tolerance to Al in\u0026nbsp;G9.\u0026nbsp;This trait was\u0026nbsp;consistent with the\u0026nbsp;results reported for\u0026nbsp;Al-tolerant\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;E. camaldulensis\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e[12, 18,\u0026nbsp;34]. Tahara\u0026nbsp;et al.\u0026nbsp;[12]\u0026nbsp;documented\u0026nbsp;in \u003cem\u003eE. camaldulensis\u003c/em\u003e that citrate had the strongest capacity to bind Al among citrate, oxalate, malate and phosphate.\u0026nbsp;Thus, it was likely that the Al-stimulated accumulation and secretion of citrate\u0026nbsp;was the main\u0026nbsp;underlying mechanism contributing to detoxification of Al by \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e roots, particularly in Al-tolerant genotypes.\u0026nbsp;However, Silva et al.\u0026nbsp;[19]\u0026nbsp;put forward the hypothesis that Al tolerance was due to the internal detoxification of Al by complexation with malate. These conflicting conclusions left\u0026nbsp;the role of malate\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e tolerance unclear.\u0026nbsp;Adding to the complexity, the\u0026nbsp;types of organic acids produced and released in response to Al may\u0026nbsp;vary among\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e species\u0026nbsp;[34], as do the quantities, as shown here for malate and citrate.\u0026nbsp;The features of malate and citrate accumulation and secretion in Al-tolerant hybrid clone\u0026nbsp;G9\u0026nbsp;and Al-sensitive parental clone W4 have provided further clues for the identification Al-induced genes or proteins.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e3.2 Newly synthesized carrier proteins involved in citrate secretion, but malate secretion facilitated by a pre-existing anion channel in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. grandis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u0026times;\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA rapid release of\u0026nbsp;organic acid\u0026nbsp;in response to exposure to Al would\u0026nbsp;suggest that pre-existing anion transporters on\u0026nbsp;the plasma membrane\u0026nbsp;quickly initiated\u0026nbsp;organic acid secretion\u0026nbsp;without the need to produce new proteins; however, a lag in the release of organic acids could indicate that\u0026nbsp;gene expression and/or protein synthesis was required\u0026nbsp;[33,\u0026nbsp;35,\u0026nbsp;36]. There was\u0026nbsp;no significant delay in malate secretion by G9, followed by an increase in the secretion of citrate after a lag period of more than 3 h. In contrast, in W4, there was a lag of more than an hour after Al exposure before\u0026nbsp;malate secretion\u0026nbsp;became apparent, while Al exposure did not induce the production or secretion of\u0026nbsp;citrate.\u0026nbsp;Thus, 24 h after exposure to Al, the synthesis and secretion of malate and citrate by G9 was much greater than in W4.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBoth\u0026nbsp;PG\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;CHM\u0026nbsp;significantly reduced the Al-induced secretion and internal concentration of citrate in roots of both\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e clones\u0026nbsp;as well as the\u0026nbsp;malate concentration\u0026nbsp;in G9. However, CHM had\u0026nbsp;no impact on malate secretion in W4, indicating\u0026nbsp;that there are\u0026nbsp;different\u0026nbsp;pathways operating for citrate\u0026nbsp;and malate\u0026nbsp;secretion in response to Al\u0026nbsp;in the two clones. Generally, Al-tolerant\u0026nbsp;species or genotypes\u0026nbsp;had stronger induction and higher quantities of carrier proteins on membranes\u0026nbsp;inside root cells\u0026nbsp;and anion channel\u0026nbsp;proteins\u0026nbsp;on\u0026nbsp;the plasma membrane of root cells,\u0026nbsp;than Al-sensitive\u0026nbsp;genotypes\u0026nbsp;[37,\u0026nbsp;38].\u0026nbsp;If\u0026nbsp;organic acid synthesis and transport require the involvement of newly synthesized\u0026nbsp;carrier proteins, an obvious lag of several hours\u0026nbsp;before secretion would be apparent, while pre-existing anion channel proteins\u0026nbsp;would\u0026nbsp;allow organic acids to be secreted out of the root more quickly\u0026nbsp;[39,\u0026nbsp;40]. Therefore, in G9, it seems likely that pre-existing anion channel proteins facilitated the immediate secretion of malate, while a new carrier protein apparently had to be produced before citrate could be transported out of\u0026nbsp;the\u0026nbsp;roots. Anion channel proteins, such as ALMT and MATE/AACT, are localized to the plasma membrane of root cells and transport their substrates to rapidly facilitate organic acid release at phytotoxic concentrations of Al\u003csup\u003e3+\u0026nbsp;\u003c/sup\u003e[41,\u0026nbsp;42].\u0026nbsp;Furthermore, numerous genes encoding OA transporters have been found to increase OA secretion and to be involved in Al detoxification [43,44].\u0026nbsp;Sawaki et al.\u0026nbsp;[1]\u0026nbsp;reported that Al-induced excretion of citrate by \u003cem\u003eE. camaldulensis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eroots was associated with higher expression of EcMATE on the plasma membrane,\u0026nbsp;and that the ectopic expression of\u0026nbsp;EcMATE\u0026nbsp;in tobacco hairy roots enhanced Al-responsive citrate excretion, providing further insight into the molecular mechanism underlying Al resistance in \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e and the potential for genetic improvement of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;However, other components remain to be revealed, particularly the new protein-coding genes and their functions in organic acid synthesis and transport. For instance, the delay in citrate secretion found in G9 was likely due to the need to produce new proteins involved in the synthesis and delivery of citric acid. For W4, there was no change in citrate secretion in response to exposure to Al,\u0026nbsp;while\u0026nbsp;malate secretion was delayed and did not reach its maximum level for 6 h.\u0026nbsp;Moreover, CHM had no effect on the secretion of malate, but did inhibit its accumulation, indicating that W4 does not lack the capacity to release malate, but rather was restricted in its ability to produce malate.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIncreasing organic acids exudation may not be the only effective way to enhance Al resistance of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;We speculate that other organic\u0026nbsp;substances\u0026nbsp;might be involved in\u0026nbsp;detoxifying\u0026nbsp;Al in some \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e genotypes. A\u0026nbsp;consequence of Al\u0026nbsp;tolerance\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003ewas\u0026nbsp;the maintenance of nutrients\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;photosynthesis\u0026nbsp;[17,45]. A\u0026nbsp;new\u0026nbsp;low-molecular-weight Al-binding ligand\u0026nbsp;from roots,\u0026nbsp;oenothein b,\u0026nbsp;contributed\u0026nbsp;to Al\u0026nbsp;tolerance\u0026nbsp;in \u003cem\u003eE. camaldulensis\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e[12,46]. In addition, a number of allelochemicals were detected in \u003cem\u003eE. grandis\u003c/em\u003e roots and soil by GC-MS [47,48]. Many of these \u0026nbsp;chemicals are involved in either primary or secondary plant metabolism and plant defense processes [49]. These process may interfere with the secretion of low molecular organic acids, or their products may form complexes with Al. For example, one study found that phenolic compounds could be\u0026nbsp;involved in\u0026nbsp;Al detoxification\u0026nbsp;forming strong complexes with Al ions in the cytoplasm of woody plants\u0026nbsp;including\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. viminalis\u003c/em\u003e Labill.\u0026nbsp;[50].\u0026nbsp;In addition,\u0026nbsp;transcriptome analysis has\u0026nbsp;revealed that\u0026nbsp;genes\u0026nbsp;associated with\u0026nbsp;flavonoid\u0026nbsp;and phenylpropanoid biosynthetic pathways have key roles in the response of roots of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eCunninghamia lanceolata\u003c/em\u003e (lamb.) hook.\u0026nbsp;to Al\u0026nbsp;[51].\u0026nbsp;All these findings\u0026nbsp;encourage further research to identify compounds and the related genes that confer\u0026nbsp;Al tolerance\u0026nbsp;to hybrid clones of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e, including the contributions made by allelopathic compounds and other root exudates.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e3.3 Secretion and accumulation of citrate and malate in hybrid clone E. grandis\u0026nbsp;\u0026times;\u0026nbsp;E. urophylla GL-9 were closely linked with changes in CS and PEPC activities\u0026nbsp;\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe observed that CS and PEPC activities in root tips of both clones were markedly induced by Al, while ME activity was significantly decreased. Together, these changes\u0026nbsp;likely contribute to the increased biosynthesis of organic acids by feeding carbon skeletons into the TCA cycle\u0026nbsp;[52].\u0026nbsp;The\u0026nbsp;balance\u0026nbsp;between\u0026nbsp;synthesis\u0026nbsp;or\u0026nbsp;catabolism of Al-induced citrate and malate was\u0026nbsp;regulated\u0026nbsp;by shifts in activities of various metabolic enzymes that together\u0026nbsp;contributed to accumulation of these organic acids to increase\u0026nbsp;Al tolerance in \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e.\u0026nbsp;Additionally,\u0026nbsp;the addition of inhibitors (PG and CHM) directly or indirectly caused changes in enzyme activities involved in organic acid metabolism.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn the case of \u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eclone W4, decreased ME activity may play a greater role in\u0026nbsp;the lower\u0026nbsp;accumulation of malate upon exposure to Al,\u0026nbsp;since MDH activity was unchanged.\u0026nbsp;Meanwhile, the activities of\u0026nbsp;ACO and IDH were significantly increased by Al exposure,\u0026nbsp;which may underlie the lack of an increase in citrate. In\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. grandis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026times;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;E. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e clone G9,\u0026nbsp;increased synthesis and secretion of malate seemed to be supported by decreased ME and MDH\u0026nbsp;activity to prevent\u0026nbsp;malate\u0026nbsp;metabolism. We speculate that genes encoding ME may contribute to increased internal malate and citrate concentrations, leading to exudation of these organic acids to confer higher Al resistance, as in soybean\u0026nbsp;[26].\u0026nbsp;CS\u0026nbsp;is typically regarded as the main enzyme necessary to increase synthesis and secretion of citrate in\u0026nbsp;roots of Al-tolerant\u0026nbsp;plants, such as rye\u0026nbsp;[53],\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eParaserianthes facataria\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e[54],\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;soybean\u0026nbsp;[55].\u0026nbsp;Moreover, transcript levels specifying\u0026nbsp;CS, ALMT and\u0026nbsp;MATE in the root apex of an Al-tolerant cultivar of alfalfa were higher than in an Al-sensitive cultivar\u0026nbsp;[27]. However, Ikka\u0026nbsp;et al.\u0026nbsp;[34]\u0026nbsp;found\u0026nbsp;that the Al-induced increase in citrate concentration in roots of \u003cem\u003eE. camaldulensis\u003c/em\u003e was not due to increased CS activity,\u0026nbsp;but was dependent on\u0026nbsp;reduced\u0026nbsp;ACO activity, which would suppress citrate catabolism\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e Recently,\u0026nbsp;Teng et al. [56] reported that\u0026nbsp;CS,\u0026nbsp;PEPC\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;IDH\u0026nbsp;may\u0026nbsp;play\u0026nbsp;important roles in organic acid biosynthesis and degradation in\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;Eucalyptus.\u003c/em\u003e Our study indicated that the\u0026nbsp;increased synthesis and secretion of citrate that\u0026nbsp;contributed to increase Al-tolerance in\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE. grandis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026times;\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;E. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e was likely achieved by increasing the activities of PEPC and CS, and decreasing the activity of ACO.\u0026nbsp;These three enzymes may\u0026nbsp;be involved in creating the\u0026nbsp;balance\u0026nbsp;between\u0026nbsp;the secretion of malate and\u0026nbsp;citrate\u0026nbsp;in\u0026nbsp;the\u0026nbsp;roots\u0026nbsp;of plants\u0026nbsp;exposed\u0026nbsp;to\u0026nbsp;Al.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFrom the above, it is clear that\u0026nbsp;key enzymes regulating\u0026nbsp;OA\u0026nbsp;synthesis and\u0026nbsp;exudation\u0026nbsp;vary\u0026nbsp;among\u0026nbsp;of\u0026nbsp;\u003cem\u003eE\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e genotypes. Alterations in the expression of the corresponding genes can affect OA synthesis and exudation resulting in\u0026nbsp;changes in Al tolerance\u0026nbsp;[57]. Some effort has been made in plants to\u0026nbsp;increase\u0026nbsp;the expression of enzymes such as PEPC, CS and MDH by introducing genes encoding these enzymes, for example,\u0026nbsp;in tobacco, alfalfa and\u0026nbsp;canola. \u0026nbsp;Overexpression of these genes would be expected to increase organic acid metabolism\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;may produce a new citrate synthesis pathway that would\u0026nbsp;contribute to increased Al tolerance in transgenic plants [58-60].\u0026nbsp;For example, in\u0026nbsp;transgenic canola,\u0026nbsp;overexpression of a CS gene\u0026nbsp;not only led to increased citrate synthesis and exudation, but also changed malate metabolism, which may improve tolerance to Al toxicity\u0026nbsp;[57,61,62].\u0026nbsp;Since previous studies have indicated\u0026nbsp;that the synthesis of organic acids could be increased by regulating the expression of genes encoding enzymes\u0026nbsp;involved in OA synthesis or transporters involved in OA secretion, transgenic approaches can be expected to provide higher Al tolerance in plants, including \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"4 Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIt appears that both citrate and malate contributed to Al tolerance in \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e and that both accumulation and secretion of these organic acids were involved in Al detoxification. The superior performance of hybrid clone \u003cem\u003eE. grandis \u003c/em\u003e\u0026times; \u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e for high yield on aluminized acidic soils was closely associated with increased capacity to release both citrate and malate. Citrate had a more important role in the response to Al in \u003cem\u003eE. grandis \u003c/em\u003e\u0026times; \u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e than in \u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e. In addition, PG and CHM treatments indicated that both anion channel proteins and increased carrier protein synthesis were involved in Al-induced secretion of citrate in Al-tolerant \u003cem\u003eE. grandis \u003c/em\u003e\u0026times; \u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e, but the secretory pathway for malate remained unclear. The enhanced activities of CS and PEPC and the reduced activities of IDH, ACO and ME contributed to Al-induced accumulation and secretion of citrate and malate, demonstrating that metabolic adaptations are associated with Al-tolerance in \u003cem\u003eE. grandis \u003c/em\u003e\u0026times; \u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e. More effort is needed to identify and isolate the genes associated with organic acid transport in \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e, or introduce exogenous genes to make specific enzymes overexpressed and have high activity, further advance Al-tolerance in superior hybrids of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e. Meanwhile, other compounds which could be involved in Al detoxification also need further investigation and elucidation of their regulatory mechanism.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"5 Methods","content":"\u003ch2\u003e5.1\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; Plant material\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTwo clones of \u003cem\u003eE\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e, Al-tolerant\u003cem\u003e E. grandis \u003c/em\u003e\u0026times; \u003cem\u003eE. urophylla \u003c/em\u003eGL-9 (Voucher number: 桂S-SC-EGU-023-2011; designated G9) and Al-sensitive\u003cem\u003e E. urophylla \u003c/em\u003eGL-4 (Voucher number: 桂S-SC-EU-022-2011; designated W4) were used in this study. Two-month-old seedlings from culture were provided by the Guangxi Forestry Research Institute, Nanning, China. Guo Dongqiang, a senior engineer and researcher formally identified the two clones [see Additional files 1, 2 and 3]. Seedlings of similar appearance and size were placed in 2L plastic buckets containing nutrient solution with 10 seedlings per bucket. All solutions were prepared with deionized water. For acclimating plants to the hydroponic culture system before Al treatment, seedlings were pre-cultured in 20% nutrient solution, pH 5.0 for 3 days, then in 50% nutrient solution, pH 4.5 for a further 3 days. Acclimated seedlings were transferred to 100% nutrient solution, pH 4.0 for 7 days. The composition of 100% nutrient solution was 6 mM KNO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e, 5 mM Ca(NO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e)\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, 1 mM MgSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e, 2 mM NH\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003eH\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003ePO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e, 20 \u0026mu;M Fe-EDTA, 31.25 \u0026micro;M H\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003eBO\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e, 2 \u0026mu;M MnCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, 2 \u0026mu;M ZnSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e, 0.5 \u0026mu;M CuSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e and 0.065 \u0026mu;M (NH\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e)\u003csub\u003e6\u003c/sub\u003eMo\u003csub\u003e7\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e24\u003c/sub\u003e. The pH was adjusted with 2 mM HCl. All nutrient solutions were renewed every 2 days. Prior to solution replacement, seedlings were sterilized with 0.1% (v/v) carbendazim for 20 min to inhibit microorganisms. Air pumps were used to continuously aerate the seedlings in hydroponics at 50 L air h\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e5.2\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; Aluminum and inhibitor treatments\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter 7 days of culture in complete nutrient solution, pH 4.0, seedlings were transferred to 2L fresh nutrient solution, pH 4.0, supplemented with or lacking 4.44 mM Al\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e from AlCl\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026bull;6H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO with ten seedlings per pot. Each treatment was carried out in triplicate (3\u0026times;10 plants). The growth solution and roots were harvested from three pots at 0.5 h, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h from the start of exposure to Al\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e. The internal concentration of citrate and malate and their concentration in the growth medium were determined at these time points. The activities of organic acid-metabolizing enzymes inside root tips were determined after 24 h of Al treatment.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo identify potential factors involved in organic acid secretion, the impact of the protein synthesis inhibitor CHM, and the anion channel blocker PG were determined by cultivating the seedlings as above in solutions supplemented with 0.5 mg L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e CHM and 0.5 mg L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e PG with 0 or 4.44 mM Al\u003csup\u003e3+\u003c/sup\u003e for 24 h. The secretion of citrate and malate from the roots was determined after 24 h.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e5.3\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; Determination of organic acids in root exudates\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSamples were prepared following the methods of Wang et al. [63], with some modifications. The collected hydroponics solution was filtered through a mixed fiber membrane to obtain 50 mL filtrate. The filtrate was passed through a cation exchange column (15 mm\u0026times;11 cm, 5 g Amerlite IR-120 resin), followed by an anion exchange column (2 g Dowex 1-X8 resin). The organic acids bound to the anion exchange column were eluted with 2 M HCl. The eluent was condensed to dryness at 40℃ by rotary evaporation (R215, Buchi, Switzerland). The dried eluent was re-dissolved into 1 mL of Milli-Q water, and filtered (0.45 \u0026mu;m membrane filter). The filtered solution was analyzed for citrate and malate using ion chromatography (ICS-5000 Ion Chromatography system with 4\u0026times;250 mm AS11-HC analytical column and 4\u0026times; 50 mm AS11-HC guard column, Dionex, USA).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e5.4\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; Analysis of malate and citrate in root tips\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHarvested roots were rinsed with Milli-Q water to remove the hydroponics solution. The distal 2 cm containing the root apices were excised to extract and assay the internal concentration of citrate and malate following the methods of Dong et al. [64] and Tahara et al. [12] with some modifications. A total weight of 0.2 g for each sample was ground under liquid nitrogen before adding 1.5 mL ice-cold 4% (v/v) HClO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e into the powder and gently homogenizing. The mixture was thawed slowly on ice into a suspension and allowed to stand for 30 min, followed by centrifugation at 20,000\u0026times;g at 4\u0026deg;C for 10 min. The supernatant was passed through an ion exchange column (l5mm \u0026times; 11cm) filled with cation exchange resin (Amerlite IR-120 resin, H\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e form, USA) to remove cations, and was then passed through the a pretreatment column (RP18 column, Dionex, USA) to absorb plant pigments. The extracted malate and citrate in roots were determined by ICS as described above.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e5.5\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; Determination of Al in root tips\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRoots were rinsed with Milli-Q water three times. The 3 cm at root apices were excised and dried at 80\u0026deg;C before grinding to a fine powder. Powdered root tips (100 mg) were digested in 10 mL HNO\u003csub\u003e3 \u003c/sub\u003e: HClO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e (5 : 1 v/v) until the solution was clear. The digest was diluted to 25 mL with Milli-Q water and the Al concentration in the solution was immediately determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (5100 ICP- OES, Agilent Technologies, USA).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e5.6\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; Activity measurement of organic acid-metabolizing enzymes\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter plants were cultured for 24 h in the presence or absence of Al, the activities of PEPC, MDH, CS, NADP-dependent IDH, NADP-dependent NADP-ME and ACO were measured. Based on the methods of Chen et al. [65] and Yu et al. [38], 200 mg of fresh root apices were homogenized in ice-cold extraction buffer containing 50 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, 5 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1% (w/v) PVPP(cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone) and 5 mM dithiothreitol. After clarification by centrifugation at 15,000 \u0026times; g for 15 min at 4\u0026deg;C, the supernatant was used for enzyme activity determination. The activities were measured in a 3 mL reaction mixture using spectrophotometric assays described by Jenner et al. [66], Chen et al. [65] and Ikka et al. [34]. The activities of all enzymes were determined at 340 nm, except CS activity was determined at 412 nm.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e5.7\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp; Data analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEach treatment was done with three biological replicates of 10 plants each. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software package. All data between different treatments was compared using one-way analysis of variance with LSD test and significant differences between the means of two treatments were determined using the Duncan test at P \u0026le; 0.05.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cp\u003eCHM: cycloheximide; PG: phenylglyoxal; CS: citrate synthase; PEPC: phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; IDH: NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase; ACO: aconitase; ME: NADP-dependent malic enzyme; ALMT: Al-activated malate transporter; MATE: Al-activated citrate transporter; TCA: tricarboxylic acid; OA: Organic Anion; MDH: malate dehydrogenase; CK: control check; AACT: Aluminum-activated citrate transporter; EDTA: ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid; NADP: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; PVPP: crosslinked polyvinylpyrrolidone; DTT: Dithiothreitol.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets used and analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis research was supported by grants from Guangxi Specific Grant for Innovation-driven Development Projects (AA17204087-6) and\u0026nbsp;National Natural Science Foundation of China\u0026nbsp;(31070560\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;31260176).\u0026nbsp;We thank the Foundation of Economic Support. The funding organizations provided the financial support to the research projects, but were not involved in the design of the study, data collection, analysis of the data, or the writing of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026apos;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWNL, QD and MY conceived and designed the research. WNL and QD collected, analyzed the data, and prepared the manuscript. GDQ cultured the \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e seedling and assisted in the determinations. MY and PMF discussed the results and revised the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the manuscript.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe thank Guangxi Forestry Research Institute for providing the clonal \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e seedlings used in this study.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026apos; information\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003eGuangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning\u0026nbsp;530004, Guangxi, PR China.\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003eSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia,\u0026nbsp;Perth 6009, Western Australia, Australia.\u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003eGuangxi Forestry Research Institute, Nanning 530002, Guangxi, PR China.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSawaki Y, Kihara-Doi T, Kobayashi Y, Nishikubo N, Kawazu T, Kobayashi Y, et al. Characterization of Al-responsive citrate excretion and citrate-transporting MATEs in \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus camaldulensis.\u003c/em\u003e 2013;237:979\u0026ndash;989.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYe SM, Wen YG, Yang M, Liang HW. Correlation analysis on biodiversity and soil physical\u0026amp; chemical properties of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus spp.\u003c/em\u003e Plantations under Successive Rotation. J Soil Water Conserv. 2010;24:246\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKinraide TB. Identity of the rhizotoxic aluminium species. Plant Soil. 1991;134:167\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKochian L V, Hoekenga OA, Pi\u0026ntilde;eros MA. How do crop plants tolerate acid soils? Mechanisms of aluminum tolerance and phosphorous efficiency. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:459\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrunner I, Sperisen C. Aluminum exclusion and aluminum tolerance in woody plants. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:1\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXu QS, Wang Y, Ding ZT, Song LB, Li YS, Ma DX, et al. Aluminum induced metabolic responses in two tea cultivars. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;101:162\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBarcel\u0026oacute; J, Poschenrieder C. Fast root growth responses, root exudates, and internal detoxification as clues to the mechanisms of aluminium toxicity and resistance: A review. Environ Exp Bot. 2002;48:75\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKikui S, Sasaki T, Osawa H, Matsumoto H, Yamamoto Y. Malate enhances recovery from aluminum-caused inhibition of root elongation in wheat. Plant Soil. 2007;290:1\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePoschenrieder C, Guns\u0026eacute; B, Corrales I, Barcel\u0026oacute; A glance into aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants. Sci Total Environ. 2008;400:356\u0026ndash;368.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHuang JH, Bachelard EP. Effects of aluminium on growth and cation uptake in seedlings of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus mannifera\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ePinus radiata.\u003c/em\u003e Plant Soil. 1993;149:121\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\u0026Aacute;lvarez E, Fern\u0026aacute;ndez-Marcos ML, Monterroso C, Fern\u0026aacute;ndez-Sanjurjo MJ. Application of aluminium toxicity indices to soils under various forest species. For Ecol Manage. 2005;211:227\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTahara K, Norisada M, Yamanoshita T, Kojima K. Role of aluminum-binding ligands in aluminum resistance of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus camaldulensis\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eMelaleuca cajuputi.\u003c/em\u003e Plant Soil. 2008;302:175\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTahara K, Norisada M, Hogetsu T, Kojima K. Aluminum tolerance and aluminum-induced deposition of callose and lignin in the root tips of \u003cem\u003eMelaleuca\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus \u003c/em\u003especies\u003cem\u003e.\u003c/em\u003e J For Res. 2005;10:325\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTahara K, Hashida K, Otsuka Y, Ohara S, Kojima K, Shinohara K. Identification of a hydrolyzable tannin, oenothein B, as an Aluminum-detoxifying ligand in a highly aluminum-resistant tree, \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus camaldulensis.\u003c/em\u003e Plant Physiol. 2014;164:683\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDe Alc\u0026acirc;ntara BK, Pizzaia D, Piotto FA, Borgo L, Brondani GE, Azevedo RA. Temporal dynamics of the response to al stress in \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus Grandis\u003c/em\u003e \u0026times; \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus Camaldulensis.\u003c/em\u003e An Acad Bras Cienc. 2015;87:1063\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLima MDR, Barbosa MAM, Batista BL, Lobato AK da S. Biochemical responses of two species of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e exposed to aluminium toxicity: Oxidative stress and antioxidant metabolism. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj-Napoca. 2016;44:107\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSilva LFF, Lima MDR, Lima EJA, Castro ARS, Barros Junior UO, Lobato AKS. Differential behaviours in two species of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e exposed to aluminium. Indian J Plant Physiol. 2017;22:107\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNguyen NT, Nakabayashi K, Thompson J, Fujita K. Role of exudation of organic acids and phosphate in aluminum tolerance of four tropical woody species. Tree Physiol. 2003;23:1041\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSilva IR, Novais RF, Jham GN, Barros NF, Gebrim FO, Nunes FN, et al. Responses of eucalypt species to aluminum: The possible involvement of low molecular weight organic acids in the Al tolerance mechanism. Tree Physiol. 2004;24:1267\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEldhuset TD, Swensen B, Wickstr\u0026oslash;m T, Wolleb\u0026aelig;k G. Organic acids in root exudates from \u003cem\u003ePicea abies\u003c/em\u003e seedlings influenced by mycorrhiza and aluminum. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2007;170:645\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKopittke PM, McKenna BA, Karunakaran C, Dynes JJ, Arthur Z, Gianoncelli A, et al. Aluminum complexation with malate within the root apoplast differs between aluminum resistant and sensitive wheat lines. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Ezaki B, Katsuhara M, Ahn SJ, Ryan PR, et al. A wheat gene encoding an aluminum-activated malate transporter. Plant J. 2004;37:645\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFurukawa J, Yamaji N, Wang H, Mitani N, Murata Y, Sato K, et al. An aluminum-activated citrate transporter in barley. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48:1081\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang JL, Zheng SJ, He YF, You JF, Zhang L, Yu XH. Comparative studies on the effect of a protein-synthesis inhibitor on aluminium-induced secretion of organic acids from \u003cem\u003eFagopyrum esculentum\u003c/em\u003e Moench and Cassia tora L. roots. Plant, Cell Environ. 2006;29:240\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRyan PR, Delhaize E, Jones DL. Function and mechanism of organic anion exudation from plant roots. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001;52:27\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhou Y, Yang ZM, Xu YZ, Sun HR, Sun ZT, Lin B, et al. Soybean NADP-malic enzyme functions in malate and citrate metabolism and contributes to their efflux under Al stress. Front Plant Sci. 2018;8:1\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSun GL, Zhu HF, Wen SL, Liu LS, Gou LM, Guo ZF. Citrate synthesis and exudation confer Al resistance in alfalfa (\u003cem\u003eMedicago sativa L.\u003c/em\u003e). Plant Soil. 2020;449:319\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang M, Huang SX, Fang SZ, Huang XL. Response of seedling growth of four \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e clones to acid and aluminum. Plant Nutr Fertil Sci. 2011;17:195\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang M, Wu YM, Huang SX, Huang XL. Resistance physiological response of different fast- growing \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e clones to acid- aluminum stresses. 2011;47:181\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang M, Tan L, Xu YY, Zhao YH, Cheng F, Ye SM, et al. Effect of low pH and aluminum toxicity on the photosynthetic characteristics of different fast-growing \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e vegetatively propagated clones. PLos One. 2015;10:1\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang M, Cao XN, Wu YM, Huang XL. Effect of acid aluminum on absorption of Al and N,P,K in \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e Clones with different aluminum tolerance. Southwest China Jounal Agric Sci. 2012;25:1061\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMa JF. Physiological mechanisms of Al resistance in higher plants. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2005;51:609\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMa JF. Role of organic acids in detoxification of aluminum in higher plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000;41:383\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIkka T, Ogawa T, Li D, Hiradate S, Morita A. Effect of aluminum on metabolism of organic acids and chemical forms of aluminum in root tips of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus camaldulensis\u003c/em\u003e Phytochemistry. 2013;94:142\u0026ndash;147.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKollmeier M, Dietrich P, Bauer CS, Horst WJ, Hedrich R. Aluminum activates a citrate-permeable anion channel in the aluminum-sensitive zone of the maize root apex. A comparison between an aluminum- sensitive and an aluminum-resistant cultivar. Plant Physiol. 2001;126:397\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRyan PR, Dong B, Watt M, Kataoka T, Delhaize E. Strategies to isolate transporters that facilitate organic anion efflux from plant roots. Plant Soil. 2003;248:61\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePi\u0026ntilde;eros MA, Magalhaes J V., Carvalho Alves VM, Kochian L V. The physiology and biophysics of an aluminum tolerance mechanism based on root citrate exudation in maize. Plant Physiol. 2002;129:1194\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYu L, Yan J, Guo SR, Zhu WM. Aluminum-induced secretion of organic acid by cowpea (\u003cem\u003eVigna unguiculata L.\u003c/em\u003e) roots. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam). 2012;135:52\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi XF, Zuo FH, Ling GZ, Li YY, Yu YX, Yang PQ, et al. Secretion of citrate from roots in response to aluminum and low phosphorus stresses in \u003cem\u003eStylosanthes\u003c/em\u003e. Plant Soil. 2009;325:219\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang LT, Jiang HX, Tang N, Chen LS. Mechanisms of aluminum-tolerance in two species of citrus: Secretion of organic acid anions and immobilization of aluminum by phosphorus in roots. Plant Sci. 2011;180:521\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCollins NC, Shirley NJ, Saeed M, Pallotta M, Gustafson JP. An \u003cem\u003eALMT1\u003c/em\u003e gene cluster controlling aluminum tolerance at the \u003cem\u003eAlt4\u003c/em\u003e Locus of Rye (\u003cem\u003eSecale cereale\u003c/em\u003e). Genetics. 2008;179:669\u0026ndash;682.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMaron LG, Guimar\u0026atilde;es CT, Kirst M, Albert PS, Birchler JA, Bradbury PJ, et al. Aluminum tolerance in maize is associated with higher MATE1 gene copy number. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:5241\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhou GF, Delhaize E, Zhou Mx, Ryan PR. The barley MATE gene, HvAACT1, increases citrate efflux and Al(3+) tolerance when expressed in wheat and barley. Annals of Botany, 2013;112(3):603\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMa QB, Yi R, Li L, Liang ZY, Zeng TT, Zhang Y, et al. GsMATE encoding a multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporter enhances aluminum tolerance in \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis thaliana\u003c/em\u003e. BMC Plant Biology. 2018;18(1):212.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSilva S, Pinto-Carnide O, Martins-Lopes P, Matos M, Guedes-Pinto H, Santos C. Differential aluminium changes on nutrient accumulation and root differentiation in an Al sensitive vs. tolerant wheat. Environ Exp Bot. 2010;68:91\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTahara K, Hiradate S, Hashida K, Shinohara K. An aluminum-resistance mechanism in \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e camaldulensis: Complexation between aluminum and oenothein B in presence of organic acids in vitro. J For Res. 2017;22:261\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang HG, Zhang J, Yang WS, Wang XX, Cheng L. A comparative research on the allopathic of \u003cem\u003eEucalyputs grandis\u003c/em\u003e in different woodland. Journal of Hebei Normal University (Natural Science Edition). 2009;31(1): 94\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang HG, Zhang J, Yang WS, Huang QM, Zou P. A research on the allelopathic substances in root system and roo t system soil of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus grandis\u003c/em\u003e. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Natural Science). 2006,29(3): 368\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBertin C, Yang XH, Weston LA. The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere. Plant and Soil, 2003,256(1): 67\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOfei-Manu P, Wagatsuma T, Ishikawa S, Tawaraya K. The plasma membrane strength of the root-tip cells and root phenolic compounds are correiated with Al tolerance in several common woody plants. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2001;47:359\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMa Z, Lin S. Transcriptomic revelation of phenolic compounds involved in aluminum toxicity responses in roots of \u003cem\u003eCunninghamia lanceolata\u003c/em\u003e (lamb.) hook. Genes (Basel). 2019; doi:10.3390/genes10110835.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDong DF, Peng XX, Yan XL. Organic acid exudation induced by phosphorus deficiency and/or aluminium toxicity in two contrasting soybean genotypes. Physiol Plant. 2004;122:190\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLi XF, Ma JF, Matsumoto H. Pattern of aluminum-induced secretion of organic acids differs between rye and wheat. Plant Physiol. 2000;123:1537\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOsawa H, Kojima K. Citrate-release-mediated aluminum resistance is coupled to the inducible expression of mitochondrial citrate synthase gene in \u003cem\u003eParaserianthes falcataria\u003c/em\u003e. Tree Physiol. 2006;26:565\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXu MY, You JF, Hou NN, Zhang HM, Chen G, Yang ZM. Mitochondrial enzymes and citrate transporter contribute to the aluminium-induced citrate secretion from soybean (\u003cem\u003eGlycine max\u003c/em\u003e) roots. Funct Plant Biol. 2010;37:285\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTeng WC, Kang YH, Hou WJ, Hu HZ, Luo WJ, Wei J, et al. Phosphorus application reduces aluminum toxicity in two \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e clones by increasing its accumulation in roots and decreasing its content in leaves. PLoS One. 2018;13:1\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDe La Fuente JM, Ram\u0026iacute;rez-Rodr\u0026iacute;guez V, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Herrera-Estrella L. Aluminum tolerance in transgenic plants by alteration of citrate synthesis. Science. 1997;276:1566\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen ZC, Liao H. Organic acid anions: An effective defensive weapon for plants against aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency in acidic soils. Journal of Genetics and Genomics. 2016;43(11):631\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSharma T, Dreyer I, Kochian L, Pi\u0026ntilde;eros MA. The ALMT family of organic acid transporters in plants and their involvement in detoxification and nutrient security. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1488.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTesfaye M, Temple SJ, Allan DL, Vance CP, Samac DA. Overexpression of malate dehydrogenase in transgenic alfalfa enhances organic acid synthesis and confers tolerance to aluminum. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:1836\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRyan PR, Tyerman SD, Sasaki T, Furuichi T, Yamamoto Y, Zhang WH, et al. The identification of aluminium-resistance genes provides opportunities for enhancing crop production on acid soils. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:9\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang Y, Xu H, Kou JJ, Shi L, Zhang CY, Xu FS. Dual effects of transgenic \u003cem\u003eBrassica napus\u003c/em\u003e overexpressing CS gene on tolerances to aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency. Plant Soil. 2013;362:231\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang P, Zhou R, Cheng JJ, Bi S. LC determination of trace short-chain organic acids in wheat root exudates under aluminum stress. Chromatographia. 2007;66:867\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDong XY, Shen RF, Chen RF, Zhu ZL, Ma JF. Secretion of malate and citrate from roots is related to high Al-resistance in \u003cem\u003eLespedeza bicolor\u003c/em\u003e. Plant Soil. 2008;306:139\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen LS, Tang N, Jiang HX, Yang LT, Li Q, Smith BR. Changes in organic acid metabolism differ between roots and leaves of \u003cem\u003eCitrus grandis\u003c/em\u003e in response to phosphorus and aluminum interactions. J Plant Physiol. 2009;166:2023\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJenner HL, Winning BM, Millar AH, Tomlinson KL, Leaver CJ, Hill SA. NAD malic enzyme and the control of carbohydrate metabolism in potato tubers. Plant Physiol. 2001;126:1139\u0026ndash;\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Additional Files","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe mentioned Additonal Files are not available with this version:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAdditional file 1. \u003c/strong\u003eCertification of superior varieties of forest tree\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(\u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e grandis \u003c/em\u003e\u0026times; \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e urophylla\u003c/em\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAdditional file 2. \u003c/strong\u003eCertification of superior varieties of forest tree\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e(\u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e urophylla\u003c/em\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAdditional file 3. \u003c/strong\u003eCertification of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e from Guangxi Forestry Research Institute.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-plant-biology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"pbio","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Plant Biology](http://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbio/default.aspx","title":"BMC Plant Biology","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Eucalyptus, aluminum tolerance, citrate, malate, metabolizing enzymes","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-27845/v3","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-27845/v3","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003e Eucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e is the main plantation wood species, mostly grown in aluminized acid soils. To understand the response of \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus \u003c/em\u003eclones to aluminum (Al) toxicity, the Al-tolerant \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e clone GL-9 (designated “G9”)\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003eand the Al-sensitive \u003cem\u003eE. urophylla\u003c/em\u003e clone GL-4 (designated “W4”) were employed to investigate the production and secretion of citrate and malate by roots.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults:\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus \u003c/em\u003eseedlings in hydroponics were exposed to the presence or absence of 4.4 mM Al at pH 4.0 for 24 hours. The protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHM) and anion channel blocker phenylglyoxal (PG) were applied to explore possible pathways involved in organic acid secretion. The secretion of malate and citrate was earlier and greater in G9 than in W4, corresponding to less Al accumulation in G9. The concentration of Al in G9 roots peaked after 1h and decreased afterwards, corresponding with a rapid induction of malate secretion. A time-lag of about 6h in citrate efflux in G9 was followed by robust secretion to support continuous Al-detoxification. Malate secretion alone may alleviate Al toxicity because the peaks of Al accumulation and malate secretion were simultaneous in W4, which did not secrete appreciable citrate. Enhanced activities of citrate synthase (CS) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC), and reduced activities of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), aconitase (ACO) and malic enzyme (ME) were closely associated with the greater secretion of citrate in G9. PG effectively inhibited citrate and malate secretion in both \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e clones. CHM also inhibited malate and citrate secretion in G9, and citrate secretion in W4, but notably did not affect malate secretion in W4. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusions:\u003c/strong\u003e G9 immediately secrete malate from roots, which had an initial effect on Al-detoxification, followed by time-delayed citrate secretion\u003cem\u003e. \u003c/em\u003ePre-existing anion channel protein first contributed to malate secretion, while synthesis of carrier protein appeared to be needed for citrate excretion. The changes of organic acid concentrations in response to Al can be achieved by enhanced CS and PEPC activities, but was supported by changes in the activities of other enzymes involved in organic acid metabolism. The above information may help to further explore genes related to Al-tolerance in \u003cem\u003eEucalyptus\u003c/em\u003e. \u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Metabolic acclimation supports higher aluminium-induced secretion of citrate and malate in an aluminium-tolerant hybrid clone of Eucalyptus","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":3,"date":"2020-12-17 14:18:38","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-27845/v3","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Accept","date":"2020-12-08T00:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2020-12-07T00:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2020-12-06T23:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2020-12-06T23:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-plant-biology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"pbio","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Plant Biology](http://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbio/default.aspx","title":"BMC Plant Biology","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":"","date":"2020-12-01 00:00:00","doi":"","editorialEvents":[{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2020-12-01T00:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2020-11-30T23:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2020-11-30T23:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"notPreprinted","content":""}],"status":"timeline","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-plant-biology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"pbio","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Plant Biology](http://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbio/default.aspx","title":"BMC Plant Biology","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":2,"date":"2020-10-22 16:22:27","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-27845/v2","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Minor revision","date":"2020-11-18T00:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2020-11-02T00:00:00+00:00","index":3,"fulltext":"Recommendation: Accept after discretionary revisions\nForm responses:\n---\n\nComments to Author:\n---\nTThe answers are well done, but much more information is needed in the manuscript. Some parts are now much more expanded but the work is the same. There are still errors in the format and in the figures (eg the axis of figure 1 ...) and some questions suggested by the reviewers that have no answer.* Publons Reviewer Recognition. Springer Nature can send verification of this review directly to Publons (a subsidiary of Clarivate Analytics). If you would like to take advantage of this service, please click on the “Yes” option below. Your name, email address, title of the reviewed manuscript, name of the journal, and date of your review submission (the “Review Data”) will then be transmitted to Publons upon publication of the manuscript. If you have already registered at Publons, they will notify you of the receipt of this review and update your profile as per your settings and their policy. If you are not registered with Publons, you will receive an email from them asking you to register in order for them to be able to recognize your review on your new profile page. Publons may use the Review Data to generate derivative metadata for the benefit of Publons and you as a reviewer, carefully considering the sensitivity of such information. For example, Publons may verify your record as a reviewer by updating your profile published on its webservice if you have registered for such service or help editors to identify candidate reviewers. Please find the details of processing in Publons’ privacy policy https://publons.com/about/terms: **Yes**\n* Declaration of competing interests: **I declare that I have no competing interests' below**\n* Is the study design appropriate to answer the research question (including the use of appropriate controls), and are the conclusions supported by the evidence presented?: **No**\n* Are the methods sufficiently described to allow the study to be repeated?: **Yes**\n* Is the use of statistics and treatment of uncertainties appropriate?: **Yes**\n* Is the presentation of the work clear?: **Yes**\n* Are the images in this manuscript (including electrophoretic gels and blots) free from apparent manipulation?: **Yes**\n"},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2020-10-22T12:00:00+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"Recommendation: Accept without revision\nForm responses:\n---\n\nComments to Author:\n---\nThe Author Li et al, did a lots of correction in this manuscript (Metabolic acclimation supports higher aluminium-induced secretion of citrate and malate in an aluminium-tolerant hybrid clone of Eucalyptus). The authors rectified the mine query. I recommended to this manuscript in my opinion.\n\n* Publons Reviewer Recognition. Springer Nature can send verification of this review directly to Publons (a subsidiary of Clarivate Analytics). If you would like to take advantage of this service, please click on the “Yes” option below. Your name, email address, title of the reviewed manuscript, name of the journal, and date of your review submission (the “Review Data”) will then be transmitted to Publons upon publication of the manuscript. If you have already registered at Publons, they will notify you of the receipt of this review and update your profile as per your settings and their policy. If you are not registered with Publons, you will receive an email from them asking you to register in order for them to be able to recognize your review on your new profile page. Publons may use the Review Data to generate derivative metadata for the benefit of Publons and you as a reviewer, carefully considering the sensitivity of such information. For example, Publons may verify your record as a reviewer by updating your profile published on its webservice if you have registered for such service or help editors to identify candidate reviewers. Please find the details of processing in Publons’ privacy policy https://publons.com/about/terms: **Yes**\n* Declaration of competing interests: **I declare that I have no competing interests.**\n* Is the study design appropriate to answer the research question (including the use of appropriate controls), and are the conclusions supported by the evidence presented?: **Yes**\n* Are the methods sufficiently described to allow the study to be repeated?: **Yes**\n* Is the use of statistics and treatment of uncertainties appropriate?: **Yes**\n* Is the presentation of the work clear?: **Yes**\n* Are the images in this manuscript (including electrophoretic gels and blots) free from apparent manipulation?: **Yes**\n"},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2020-10-14T12:00:00+00:00","index":3,"fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2020-10-14T12:00:00+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"Recommendation: Accept without revision\nForm responses:\n---\n\nComments to Author:\n---\n* Publons Reviewer Recognition. Springer Nature can send verification of this review directly to Publons (a subsidiary of Clarivate Analytics). If you would like to take advantage of this service, please click on the “Yes” option below. Your name, email address, title of the reviewed manuscript, name of the journal, and date of your review submission (the “Review Data”) will then be transmitted to Publons upon publication of the manuscript. If you have already registered at Publons, they will notify you of the receipt of this review and update your profile as per your settings and their policy. If you are not registered with Publons, you will receive an email from them asking you to register in order for them to be able to recognize your review on your new profile page. Publons may use the Review Data to generate derivative metadata for the benefit of Publons and you as a reviewer, carefully considering the sensitivity of such information. For example, Publons may verify your record as a reviewer by updating your profile published on its webservice if you have registered for such service or help editors to identify candidate reviewers. Please find the details of processing in Publons’ privacy policy https://publons.com/about/terms: **No**\n* Declaration of competing interests: **I declare that I have no competing interests**\n* Is the study design appropriate to answer the research question (including the use of appropriate controls), and are the conclusions supported by the evidence presented?: **Yes**\n* Are the methods sufficiently described to allow the study to be repeated?: **Yes**\n* Is the use of statistics and treatment of uncertainties appropriate?: **Yes**\n* Is the presentation of the work clear?: **Yes**\n* Are the images in this manuscript (including electrophoretic gels and blots) free from apparent manipulation?: **Yes**\n"},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2020-10-13T12:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2020-10-13T12:00:00+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2020-10-13T12:00:00+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2020-10-11T12:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2020-10-10T12:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2020-10-10T12:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-plant-biology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"pbio","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Plant Biology](http://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbio/default.aspx","title":"BMC Plant Biology","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}},{"code":1,"date":"2020-05-28 17:12:33","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-27845/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major revision","date":"2020-08-27T12:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2020-08-06T12:00:00+00:00","index":4,"fulltext":"Recommendation: Reject\nForm responses:\n---\n\nComments to Author:\n---\nThe major concern is novelty, which is missing in the work. There are several previous reports on citrate and malate role in Al detoxification.\n\nOther comments are given in annotated attached PDF file.* Publons Reviewer Recognition. Springer Nature can send verification of this review directly to Publons (a subsidiary of Clarivate Analytics). If you would like to take advantage of this service, please click on the “Yes” option below. Your name, email address, title of the reviewed manuscript, name of the journal, and date of your review submission (the “Review Data”) will then be transmitted to Publons upon publication of the manuscript. If you have already registered at Publons, they will notify you of the receipt of this review and update your profile as per your settings and their policy. If you are not registered with Publons, you will receive an email from them asking you to register in order for them to be able to recognize your review on your new profile page. Publons may use the Review Data to generate derivative metadata for the benefit of Publons and you as a reviewer, carefully considering the sensitivity of such information. For example, Publons may verify your record as a reviewer by updating your profile published on its webservice if you have registered for such service or help editors to identify candidate reviewers. Please find the details of processing in Publons’ privacy policy https://publons.com/about/terms: **Yes**\n* Declaration of competing interests: **I declare that I have no competing interests**\n* Is the study design appropriate to answer the research question (including the use of appropriate controls), and are the conclusions supported by the evidence presented?: **No**\n* Are the methods sufficiently described to allow the study to be repeated?: **Yes**\n* Is the use of statistics and treatment of uncertainties appropriate?: **Yes**\n* Is the presentation of the work clear?: **No**\n* Are the images in this manuscript (including electrophoretic gels and blots) free from apparent manipulation?: **Yes**\n"},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2020-07-26T12:00:00+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"Recommendation: Accept after discretionary revisions\nForm responses:\n---\n\nComments to Author:\n---\nThe present work focuses on the question of metabolic acclimatizations versus superior aluminum treatments. In this work, the authors relate the already known secretion of OA during exposure to Al with anion channels by blocking them. They compare a tolerant hybrid with a sensitive clone.\n\nThe secretion and accumulation of Citrate and Malate contributes to Al tolerance in Eucalyptus, more in G9 (tolerant) than in W4 (sensitive). The use of PG and CHM indicates that the anion channels were involved in Al-induced citrate secretion, although this is not clear for malate secretion. The role of some enzymes such as PEPC and Citrate synthase appears to be a metabolic adaptation in the tolerant G9 hybrid, but the authors should determine the metabolic variations to which they refer.\n\nThese results justify publication in the journal with some minor revisions:\n\n* in 2.2 or 2.5, or in 3.3, the abbreviations must go in the text together with the full name the first time they are named, because the reading becomes debsa and heavy if not.\n* What about allelopathic compounds in eucalyptus? They can interfere with the secretion of some compounds. The authors do not refer to them.\n* Figures 2 and 3, maybe it is an optical effect, but the titles do not read well and in general there is little resolution in the figures\n* Reference 15: Piñeiros with ñ\n* Reference 39: the author's initial is missing and, therefore, the reference is not complete\n* text line 70: Brunner is written with a unique n. Check the match with the reference\n\n\n\n\n* Publons Reviewer Recognition. Springer Nature can send verification of this review directly to Publons (a subsidiary of Clarivate Analytics). If you would like to take advantage of this service, please click on the “Yes” option below. Your name, email address, title of the reviewed manuscript, name of the journal, and date of your review submission (the “Review Data”) will then be transmitted to Publons upon publication of the manuscript. If you have already registered at Publons, they will notify you of the receipt of this review and update your profile as per your settings and their policy. If you are not registered with Publons, you will receive an email from them asking you to register in order for them to be able to recognize your review on your new profile page. Publons may use the Review Data to generate derivative metadata for the benefit of Publons and you as a reviewer, carefully considering the sensitivity of such information. For example, Publons may verify your record as a reviewer by updating your profile published on its webservice if you have registered for such service or help editors to identify candidate reviewers. Please find the details of processing in Publons’ privacy policy https://publons.com/about/terms: **No**\n* Declaration of competing interests: **I declare that I have no competing interests' below**\n* Is the study design appropriate to answer the research question (including the use of appropriate controls), and are the conclusions supported by the evidence presented?: **Yes**\n* Are the methods sufficiently described to allow the study to be repeated?: **Yes**\n* Is the use of statistics and treatment of uncertainties appropriate?: **Yes**\n* Is the presentation of the work clear?: **Yes**\n* Are the images in this manuscript (including electrophoretic gels and blots) free from apparent manipulation?: **Yes**\n"},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2020-07-26T12:00:00+00:00","index":3,"fulltext":"Recommendation: Accept after minor essential revisions\nForm responses:\n---\n\nComments to Author:\n---\nThis manuscript (Metabolic acclimation supports higher aluminium-induced secretion of citrate and malate in an aluminium-tolerant hybrid clone of Eucalyptus) of Li et al is a good manuscript in plant science research. I would like to appreciate this work to all author. In this studies author investigate the citrate and malate play important role to Al tolerance in Eucalyptus and internal accumulation and secretion of the organic acids were involved in Al detoxification. The different Al-tolerant Eucalyptus clones, secretion and internal accumulation of citrate and malate in roots were involved in Al detoxification. Citrate synthase and relevant PEPC, MDH, ME, IDH, ACO and metabolizing enzymes more important role in the response to Al in E. grandis × E. urophylla. Overall this studies citrate and malate worked as a tolerant and detoxification of Al stress in Eucalyptus.\nI have some comments for the authors regarding this manuscript.\n\n1. In line no. 60, references should include.\n2. In line no.303, Determination of organic acid in root exudates, author should add reference for this methodology.\n3. In line no. 312, analysis of malate and citrate, author should add reference for this methodology.\n4. In all figure, resolution is less so author should enhanced the clarity.\n* Publons Reviewer Recognition. Springer Nature can send verification of this review directly to Publons (a subsidiary of Clarivate Analytics). If you would like to take advantage of this service, please click on the “Yes” option below. Your name, email address, title of the reviewed manuscript, name of the journal, and date of your review submission (the “Review Data”) will then be transmitted to Publons upon publication of the manuscript. If you have already registered at Publons, they will notify you of the receipt of this review and update your profile as per your settings and their policy. If you are not registered with Publons, you will receive an email from them asking you to register in order for them to be able to recognize your review on your new profile page. Publons may use the Review Data to generate derivative metadata for the benefit of Publons and you as a reviewer, carefully considering the sensitivity of such information. For example, Publons may verify your record as a reviewer by updating your profile published on its webservice if you have registered for such service or help editors to identify candidate reviewers. Please find the details of processing in Publons’ privacy policy https://publons.com/about/terms: **Yes**\n* Declaration of competing interests: **No\nI declare that I have no competing interests.**\n* Is the study design appropriate to answer the research question (including the use of appropriate controls), and are the conclusions supported by the evidence presented?: **Yes**\n* Are the methods sufficiently described to allow the study to be repeated?: **No**\n* Is the use of statistics and treatment of uncertainties appropriate?: **Yes**\n* Is the presentation of the work clear?: **Yes**\n* Are the images in this manuscript (including electrophoretic gels and blots) free from apparent manipulation?: **Yes**\n"},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2020-07-23T12:00:00+00:00","index":4,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2020-07-22T12:00:00+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2020-07-22T12:00:00+00:00","index":3,"fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2020-07-03T12:00:00+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"Recommendation: Reject\nForm responses:\n---\n\nComments to Author:\n---\nThis study investigated the organic acid anions excretion from Eucalyptus roots in response to Al stress in two clones contrasting in Al tolerance. The authors further investigated the relationship among organic acid secretion, Al accumulation, and organic acid content. The Al-tolerant clone G9 is able to excrete malate and citrate more than the Al-sensitive clone W4. In addition, organic acid excretion is associated with changes in enzyme activities involved in its metabolism. First, there are tremendous researches regarding the role of organic acids in plant Al tolerance, and its importance in exclusion of Al from roots. there are also a lot of works concerning the contribution of organic acid metabolism to its secretion under Al stress. Therefore, the finding of the present work is not interesting. Second, genes encoding both Al-induced malate and citrate secretion have been characterized in many plant species. However, this work did not have any such work. Finally, the English needs to be substantially improved. Based on these, I don't think this study is worth to be accepted for publication.* Publons Reviewer Recognition. Springer Nature can send verification of this review directly to Publons (a subsidiary of Clarivate Analytics). If you would like to take advantage of this service, please click on the “Yes” option below. Your name, email address, title of the reviewed manuscript, name of the journal, and date of your review submission (the “Review Data”) will then be transmitted to Publons upon publication of the manuscript. If you have already registered at Publons, they will notify you of the receipt of this review and update your profile as per your settings and their policy. If you are not registered with Publons, you will receive an email from them asking you to register in order for them to be able to recognize your review on your new profile page. Publons may use the Review Data to generate derivative metadata for the benefit of Publons and you as a reviewer, carefully considering the sensitivity of such information. For example, Publons may verify your record as a reviewer by updating your profile published on its webservice if you have registered for such service or help editors to identify candidate reviewers. Please find the details of processing in Publons’ privacy policy https://publons.com/about/terms: **Yes**\n* Are the methods appropriate and well described?: **Yes**\n* Does the work include the necessary controls?: **Yes**\n* Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the data shown?: **Yes**\n* Are you able to assess any statistics in the manuscript or would you recommend an additional statistical review?: **I am able to assess the statistics**\n* Quality of written English: **Not suitable for publication unless extensively edited**\n* Declaration of competing interests: **I declare that I have no competing interests.**\n"},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2020-06-15T12:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2020-06-15T12:00:00+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2020-05-15T12:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"","date":"2020-05-14T12:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2020-05-14T12:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"","date":"2020-05-14T12:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-plant-biology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"pbio","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Plant Biology](http://bmcplantbiol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbio/default.aspx","title":"BMC Plant Biology","twitterHandle":"BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"9213040a-270d-4efc-b03c-cc60d595d9f9","owner":[],"postedDate":"December 17th, 2020","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":1523257,"name":"Plant Molecular Biology and Genetics"},{"id":1523258,"name":"Plant Physiology and Morphology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-01-10T15:08:57+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-27845","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02788-4","journal":{"identity":"bmc-plant-biology","isVorOnly":false,"title":"BMC Plant Biology"},"publishedOn":"2021-01-06 15:02:14","publishedOnDateReadable":"January 6th, 2021"},"versionCreatedAt":"2020-12-17 14:18:38","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s12870-020-02788-4","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02788-4","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v3","identity":"rs-27845","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-27845","identity":"rs-27845","version":["v3"]},"buildId":"_2-kVJe1T_tPrBINL-cwx","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}