Transvaginal morcellation within an enclosed bag in gynecological surgeries: a comprehensive systematic review and analysis of safety, efficacy, and outcomes.

OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

PurposeThis systematic review aims to comprehensively assess the safety and efficacy of transvaginal morcellation within an enclosed bag in gynecological surgeries, with a focus on its benefits, potential risks, and recommendations for its use.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of Epistemonikos, Web of Science, Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane databases for studies on transvaginal contained morcellation in adult patients undergoing gynecological surgeries. The review included 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria, encompassing diverse surgical procedures, patient profiles, and outcomes. These studies were thoroughly reviewed and analyzed to assess the safety and efficacy of the morcellation technique.ResultsKey findings from the selected studies indicate that transvaginal morcellation within an enclosed bag offers several advantages in gynecological surgeries, including reduced invasiveness, shorter operative times, and minimal blood loss when compared to conventional methods. The risk of tumor recurrence or dissemination appears to be low when appropriate precautions are taken, emphasizing the technique's safety, especially when performed by experienced surgical teams. While some studies reported complications, these were generally not directly associated with the morcellation technique.ConclusionTransvaginal morcellation within an enclosed bag demonstrates potential as a safe and effective option for gynecological surgeries. The technique offers the benefits of minimally invasive procedures, including reduced bleeding, shorter recovery times, and improved cosmetic outcomes. This review also highlights the need for standardization in study methodologies and reporting, as the heterogeneity in outcomes across the selected studies poses challenges in drawing definitive conclusions.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-14T06:08:30.651965+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0