Endometriosis in the cecum diagnosed via forward-viewing endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with a 19G fine-needle biopsy needle: a case report
Forward-viewing endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition successfully diagnosed cecal endometriosis in a patient with a protruding lesion, enabling non-surgical management.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper reports a single 30-year-old woman with a protruding cecal subepithelial lesion in whom colonoscopy suggested a subepithelial lesion, while CT showed a 37-mm contrast-enhancing mass and an adjacent suspected enlarged lymph node, raising differential diagnosis such as gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Using a forward-viewing echoendoscope advanced transanally to the cecum in 4 minutes, the authors performed endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) with a 19-gauge needle for the cecal mass and a 25-gauge needle for the adjacent lesion, with histopathology and immunohistochemistry demonstrating endometrial glands and stroma positive for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and CD10. The authors state the key limitation implied by the design is that it is a case report, and diagnostic and management generalizability is not established. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically, endometriosis of the cecum diagnosed via forward-viewing EUS-guided tissue acquisition.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,189 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 3 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
References
Acknowledgements
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (11)
- W1941806347 via openalex
- W2001476684 via openalex
- W2019961753 via openalex
- W2028063687 via openalex
- W2068836679 via openalex
- W2518204445 via openalex
- W2889230464 via openalex
- W3084239158 via openalex
- W4284992752 via openalex
- W4392912784 via openalex
- W4396723496 via openalex
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-24T06:08:07.662257+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-08-24T06:00:56.003797+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-08-24T06:02:54.254847+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-24T06:27:14.670421+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine