Endometriosis in the cecum diagnosed via forward-viewing endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with a 19G fine-needle biopsy needle: a case report

article OA: closed public-domain-us
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-16

Forward-viewing endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition successfully diagnosed cecal endometriosis in a patient with a protruding lesion, enabling non-surgical management.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16 · read from full text

This paper reports a single 30-year-old woman with a protruding cecal subepithelial lesion in whom colonoscopy suggested a subepithelial lesion, while CT showed a 37-mm contrast-enhancing mass and an adjacent suspected enlarged lymph node, raising differential diagnosis such as gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Using a forward-viewing echoendoscope advanced transanally to the cecum in 4 minutes, the authors performed endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) with a 19-gauge needle for the cecal mass and a 25-gauge needle for the adjacent lesion, with histopathology and immunohistochemistry demonstrating endometrial glands and stroma positive for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and CD10. The authors state the key limitation implied by the design is that it is a case report, and diagnostic and management generalizability is not established. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically, endometriosis of the cecum diagnosed via forward-viewing EUS-guided tissue acquisition.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the lower gastrointestinal tract are rare, and diagnosis and treatment of colorectal SELs are often challenging. Although endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is useful for minimally invasive histological diagnosis, few reports have described its use for right-sided colonic SELs because advancing an oblique-viewing echoendoscope into the right colon is difficult. A 30-year-old woman was referred to our hospital after colonoscopy revealed a protruding cecal lesion suggestive of an SEL. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a 37-mm contrast-enhancing mass and an adjacent lesion, thought to be an enlarged lymph node, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor was suspected. A forward-viewing echoendoscope was inserted transanally and advanced successfully to the cecum in 4 min. EUS-TA of the cecal mass was performed using a 19-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle, and EUS-TA of the adjacent lesion was performed using a 25-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle. Histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations showed endometrial glands and stroma with positivity for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and CD10, leading to a definitive diagnosis of endometriosis. This diagnosis enabled initial non-surgical management without immediate surgery.
Full text 5,189 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the lower gastrointestinal tract are rare, and diagnosis and treatment of colorectal SELs are often challenging. Although endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is useful for minimally invasive histological diagnosis, few reports have described its use for right-sided colonic SELs because advancing an oblique-viewing echoendoscope into the right colon is difficult. A 30-year-old woman was referred to our hospital after colonoscopy revealed a protruding cecal lesion suggestive of an SEL. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a 37-mm contrast-enhancing mass and an adjacent lesion, thought to be an enlarged lymph node, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor was suspected. A forward-viewing echoendoscope was inserted transanally and advanced successfully to the cecum in 4 min. EUS-TA of the cecal mass was performed using a 19-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle, and EUS-TA of the adjacent lesion was performed using a 25-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle. Histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations showed endometrial glands and stroma with positivity for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and CD10, leading to a definitive diagnosis of endometriosis. This diagnosis enabled initial non-surgical management without immediate surgery. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Landi B, Palazzo L. The role of endosonography in submucosal tumors. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23:679–701. Cazacu IM, Singh BS, Luzuriaga Chavez AA, et al. EUS and EUS-guided FNA/core biopsies in the evaluation of subepithelial lesions of the lower gastrointestinal tract: 10-year experience. Endosc Ultrasound. 2020;9:329–36. Nguyen-Tang T, Shah JN, Sanchez-Yague A, Binmoeller KF. Use of front-view forward-array echoendoscope to evaluate right colonic subepithelial lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:606–10. Inoue T, Okumura F, Sano H, et al. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy on the diagnosis of subepithelial tumors: a propensity score-matching analysis. Dig Endosc. 2019;31:156–63. Inoue A, Ota S, Yamasaki M, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive radiological review. Jpn J Radiol. 2022;40:1105–20. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013;42:399–415. Gong EJ, Kim DH. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gastric subepithelial lesions. Clin Endosc. 2016;49:425–33. Tao L, Chen Y, Fang Q, et al. Feasibility and clinical value of linear endoscopic ultrasonography imaging in the lower gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions. Sci Rep. 2024;14:6468. Sasaki Y, Niwa Y, Hirooka Y, et al. The use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for investigation of submucosal and extrinsic masses of the colon and rectum. Endoscopy. 2005;37:154–60. Ishikawa T, Yamao K, Mizutani Y, et al. A prospective study on the histological evaluation of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy with a 19-gauge Franseen needle. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2024;31:581–90. Zhang XC, Li QL, Yu YF, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle sampling for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:2431–41. Tateishi H, Tsuruta O, Nakahara K, et al. Endoscopic findings and diagnostic considerations for rectal endometriosis Japanese. Shokaki Naishikyo. 2004;16:196–200.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the medical staff at Tane General Hospital who were involved in this study and assisted with the endoscopic procedures. Funding None. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions KK: Writing—original draft. KT: Supervision, Writing—review & editing. SO, KM, YK, EN, EA and SA: Investigation. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Informed consent Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of her case details and the associated images. Animal or Human rights All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national guidelines and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2024. Additional information Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Kawasaki, K., Takeshita, K., Otachi, S. et al. Endometriosis in the cecum diagnosed via forward-viewing endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with a 19G fine-needle biopsy needle: a case report. Clin J Gastroenterol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-026-02392-3 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-026-02392-3

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

References (11)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-24T06:08:07.662257+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-08-24T06:00:56.003797+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-24T06:02:54.254847+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-24T06:27:14.670421+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine