Cell type-specific epigenomic variation and its association with genotype in the human breast
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
Abstract
Background Understanding the interplay between genome variation and epigenomic structure is fundamental to the study of the development and mechanisms of disease. Previous studies have leveraged population-scale genotype surveys to associate alleles with epigenomic states in heterogenous tissue types. However, epigenomes are inherently cell type-specific, giving rise to unique genome-epigenome interactions that can influence distinct functional states and susceptibility to disease. Moreover, the extent of individual variation in cell type-specific epigenotypes remains poorly understood, posing additional challenges to accurately link genotypes with epigenomic features. Results We generated comprehensive genomic and epigenomic measurements in four functionally defined human breast cell types across eight individuals. We developed a method to measure histone modification variance, discovering significantly higher variation in repressive chromatin states marked by H3K27me3 compared to the active states marked by H3K27ac and H3K4me3. Genetic variation linked to variation in chromatin state was highly cell type-specific, with nearly 90% occurring uniquely in a single cell type, and active histone modifications were enriched in these variants relative to repressive modifications. Association with gene transcription allowed for the prioritization of functional candidates, and the regulatory impact of an ANXA1 -linked variant, rs75071948, was validated in vitro with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HDR. Conclusions We define structures of epigenomic variability among breast cell types and present evidence of extensive cell type-specific genome-epigenome interactions, highlighting the critical role of cell type in mediating these associations in the breast.
Full text
1,852 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 3 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Background Understanding the interplay between genome variation and epigenomic structure is fundamental to the study of the development and mechanisms of disease. Previous studies have leveraged population-scale genotype surveys to associate alleles with epigenomic states in heterogenous tissue types. However, epigenomes are inherently cell type-specific, giving rise to unique genome-epigenome interactions that can influence distinct functional states and susceptibility to disease. Moreover, the extent of individual variation in cell type-specific epigenotypes remains poorly understood, posing additional challenges to accurately link genotypes with epigenomic features.
Results
We generated comprehensive genomic and epigenomic measurements in four functionally defined human breast cell types across eight individuals. We developed a method to measure histone modification variance, discovering significantly higher variation in repressive chromatin states marked by H3K27me3 compared to the active states marked by H3K27ac and H3K4me3. Genetic variation linked to variation in chromatin state was highly cell type-specific, with nearly 90% occurring uniquely in a single cell type, and active histone modifications were enriched in these variants relative to repressive modifications. Association with gene transcription allowed for the prioritization of functional candidates, and the regulatory impact of an ANXA1-linked variant, rs75071948, was validated in vitro with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HDR.
Conclusions
We define structures of epigenomic variability among breast cell types and present evidence of extensive cell type-specific genome-epigenome interactions, highlighting the critical role of cell type in mediating these associations in the breast.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Ask this paper
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0