Addition of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist and/or two inseminations with husband's sperm do not improve the pregnancy rate in superovulated cycles
rct
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
Adding GnRH-a to hMG stimulation or performing two inseminations instead of one did not improve pregnancy rates in superovulated cycles, though GnRH-a increased multiple pregnancies.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized study was performed to evaluate the addition of a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) during treatment with human menopausal gonadotropins (hMG) in cycles with artificial inseminations with husband's washed sperm (AIH). We also compared the pregnancy rate per cycle after one versus two AIHs.
METHODS: We designed a 22 factorial trial. A total of 172 couples with unexplained infertility (n=88), endometriosis (n=39), or cervical (n=24) or male (n=21) factors were included, of whom 161 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and treatment. Eighty-one women were treated with GnRH-a/hMG and another 80 with hMG only, respectively.
RESULTS: The pregnancy rates did not differ between the two stimulation protocols (12% for GnRH-a/hMG and 9% for hMG). With GnRH-a/hMG more follicles >15 mm (3.4 and 2.4, respectively; p<0.01) and a higher multiple pregnancy rate after 20 weeks of gestation were observed (55% vs. 0%; p<0.05). Eighty-seven women were treated with one AIH, whereas 65 women received two AIHs on two consecutive days. The pregnancy rates were similar in these two groups (11% and 9% respectively; n.s.)
CONCLUSION: It is concluded that neither addition of GnRH-a before and during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation nor two AIHs compared with one single AIH per cycle has a beneficial effect on the pregnancy rate. However, GnRH-a increases the risk for multiple pregnancies.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-12T06:07:16.479679+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:41.710148+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-12T06:43:03.944938+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine