Real-world assessment of breast cancer risk following hormonal therapy in endometriosis: A Global Collaborative Network propensity score matched analysis.

In: Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2025 · vol. 43(16_suppl) , pp. 11143 · doi:10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.11143 · W4410811192
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08

Hormonal therapy for endometriosis showed a marginally increased overall breast cancer risk, with LHRH analogues and progestins associated with higher incidence.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-08 · read from full text

This propensity score matched analysis of the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network evaluated breast cancer risk in 38,311 patients with endometriosis receiving hormonal therapy compared to controls. The study found that while overall hormonal therapy did not significantly increase breast cancer incidence, treatment with LHRH analogues was associated with a higher risk, and progestins showed a marginally increased risk. The authors note that these medications are typically prescribed to patients with severe symptoms who may share common reproductive and hormonal risk factors with breast cancer. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically assessing the oncological safety of hormonal therapies used for its management.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

11143 Background: Research suggests endometriosis, an estrogen-dependent condition, may be a potential risk factor for breast cancer (BC) development. While oral contraceptives are the standard treatment, their efficacy is limited in symptom control. This study examines the relationship between hormonal therapy (HT) prescribed for endometriosis management and BC risk. Methods: Using TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, we compared 41 029 endometriosis patients receiving HT against 111 429 control patients without HT. We excluded patients with prior contraceptive use or neoplasm diagnosis. Through propensity score matching, we created 38 311 balanced pairs, accounting for demographics (age, race), medical history (pelvic disease, family cancer history, hypertension, diabetes), and clinical factors (pregnancies, body mass index). Additional analyses were conducted by type of HT: progestins (36 156 matched pairs) and LHRH analogues (7 700 matched pairs). BC incidence was measured using hazard ratios, starting 6 months post-endometriosis diagnosis. We evaluated the rate of pregnancies and we also conducted an analysis to assess the risk of major cardiovascular events according to HT treatment for endometriosis, including stroke, cardiac ischemia, thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. Results: The matched cohorts had a mean age of 34 years (standard deviation 9.3). The study population was predominantly white (60%), with lower representation of Black American (10%) and Asian (3%) patients, while race was unknown for 19% of participants. Among patients with endometriosis treated with HT, 262 of them developed BC compared to 239 cases in the control group with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.18 (95% CI 1.0-1.4, p = 0.064), showing no significant age-related differences. LHRHa treatment was associated with higher BC incidence (66 versus 36 cases, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.14-2.6, p = 0.009). Age-stratified analysis of LHRHa patients showed no differences for those under 30 and 40 years, while patients under 50 showed a non-significant increase (25 versus 19 cases, HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.70-2.32, p = 0.42). Progestin treatment showed marginally increased BC risk (243 versus 216 cases, HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.4, p = 0.05) without age-related differences. Patients in the control group not receiving HT presented a lower chance to get pregnant (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.3-1.4). No significant differences were observed in terms of major cardiovascular events. Conclusions: While overall HT showed no clear link to BC risk, both progestins and LHRHa were associated with increased risk. These findings warrant further investigation, particularly since these medications are typically prescribed to endometriosis patients with severe symptoms who share common reproductive and hormonal risk factors with BC.
Full text 4,908 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

11143

Background

Research suggests endometriosis, an estrogen-dependent condition, may be a potential risk factor for breast cancer (BC) development. While oral contraceptives are the standard treatment, their efficacy is limited in symptom control. This study examines the relationship between hormonal therapy (HT) prescribed for endometriosis management and BC risk. Methods: Using TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, we compared 41 029 endometriosis patients receiving HT against 111 429 control patients without HT. We excluded patients with prior contraceptive use or neoplasm diagnosis. Through propensity score matching, we created 38 311 balanced pairs, accounting for demographics (age, race), medical history (pelvic disease, family cancer history, hypertension, diabetes), and clinical factors (pregnancies, body mass index). Additional analyses were conducted by type of HT: progestins (36 156 matched pairs) and LHRH analogues (7 700 matched pairs). BC incidence was measured using hazard ratios, starting 6 months post-endometriosis diagnosis. We evaluated the rate of pregnancies and we also conducted an analysis to assess the risk of major cardiovascular events according to HT treatment for endometriosis, including stroke, cardiac ischemia, thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. Results: The matched cohorts had a mean age of 34 years (standard deviation 9.3). The study population was predominantly white (60%), with lower representation of Black American (10%) and Asian (3%) patients, while race was unknown for 19% of participants. Among patients with endometriosis treated with HT, 262 of them developed BC compared to 239 cases in the control group with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.18 (95% CI 1.0-1.4, p = 0.064), showing no significant age-related differences. LHRHa treatment was associated with higher BC incidence (66 versus 36 cases, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.14-2.6, p = 0.009). Age-stratified analysis of LHRHa patients showed no differences for those under 30 and 40 years, while patients under 50 showed a non-significant increase (25 versus 19 cases, HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.70-2.32, p = 0.42). Progestin treatment showed marginally increased BC risk (243 versus 216 cases, HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.4, p = 0.05) without age-related differences. Patients in the control group not receiving HT presented a lower chance to get pregnant (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.3-1.4). No significant differences were observed in terms of major cardiovascular events. Conclusions: While overall HT showed no clear link to BC risk, both progestins and LHRHa were associated with increased risk. These findings warrant further investigation, particularly since these medications are typically prescribed to endometriosis patients with severe symptoms who share common reproductive and hormonal risk factors with BC. Formats available You can view the full content in the following formats: Information & Authors Information Published In Copyright © 2025 by American Society of Clinical Oncology. History Published online: May 28, 2025 Published in print: June 01, 2025 Authors Funding Information None. Metrics & Citations Metrics Altmetric Citations Article Citation Real-world assessment of breast cancer risk following hormonal therapy in endometriosis: A Global Collaborative Network propensity score matched analysis.. J Clin Oncol 43, 11143-11143(2025). Download Citation If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu. Download article citation data for: Alberto Farolfi, Michela Palleschi, Filippo Merloni, Gema Hernández, Francesca Rusconi, Nicola Gentili, Sara Testoni, Alice Andalò, Giulia Miserocchi, Daniela Montanari, Chiara Casadei, Marita Mariotti, Francesca Mannozzi, Giandomenico Di Menna, Marianna Sirico, Roberta Maltoni, Lorenzo Cecconetto, Samanta Sarti, Antonino Musolino Journal of Clinical Oncology 2025 43:16_suppl, 11143-11143 Alberto Farolfi, Michela Palleschi, Filippo Merloni, Gema Hernández, Francesca Rusconi, Nicola Gentili, Sara Testoni, Alice Andalò, Giulia Miserocchi, Daniela Montanari, Chiara Casadei, Marita Mariotti, Francesca Mannozzi, Giandomenico Di Menna, Marianna Sirico, Roberta Maltoni, Lorenzo Cecconetto, Samanta Sarti, Antonino Musolino Journal of Clinical Oncology 2025 43:16_suppl, 11143-11143 View Options View options Login options Check and see if you have full access through your login credentials or institution. ASCO membership or a journal subscription may be required to download the PDF version of this article. Personal login Institutional Login

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-21T07:16:15.697306+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK