Breastfeeding with Primary Low Milk Supply:  A Phenomenological Exploration of Mother’s Lived Experiences of Professional and Peer Support

Breastfeeding with Primary Low Milk Supply: A Phenomenological Exploration of Mother’s Lived Experiences of Professional and Peer Support | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Breastfeeding with Primary Low Milk Supply: A Phenomenological Exploration of Mother’s Lived Experiences of Professional and Peer Support Caoimhe Whelan, Denise O'Brien, Abbey Hyde This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4560043/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 27 Jan, 2025 Read the published version in International Breastfeeding Journal → Version 1 posted 13 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: Most women can produce enough milk to exclusively breastfeed. However, a small cohort are prevented from doing so due to a condition known as primary low milk supply . Aim: To provide new insights into how mothers with primary low milk supply experience help and support from professionals, volunteers, and partners. Methods: Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to explore the lived experiences of nine breastfeeding mothers with primary low milk supply. Hour-long interviews were conducted over Zoom. Results: Being with Others is one of four superordinate themes identified in this study. This theme concerned the participants’ experiences of receiving professional, peer, and voluntary breastfeeding supports. It also considers how participants were supported by their partners. Four sub-themes were identified: Disconnected Encounters , Perceiving Judgement from Others , Being in a Safe Space and Having a Saviour . Conclusion: The interactions that mothers with primary low milk supply have with various others in their world (health care professionals, lactation consultants, peer breastfeeding supporters, and partners) can shape how they view themselves and can have a profound impact on their breastfeeding journey. The encounters of participants with healthcare professionals revealed a lack of rapport, intrusive hands-on support, poor perceived quality of breastfeeding support and a heightened sensitivity to language and tone. Mothers with primary low milk supply value empathy and emotional support from lactation professionals as much as they value skilled lactation support. We recommend that healthcare professionals receive education concerning primary low milk supply and communication skills training on the provision of sensitive person-centred breastfeeding support. 1. Background Most mothers produce enough milk to breastfeed exclusively in line with the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations. 1 However, a small cohort of women are prevented from doing so due to a phenomenon known as primary low milk supply (PLMS). 2,3 PLMS is an intrinsic condition which can be caused by mammary hypoplasia. 4,5,6 , metabolic disease or hormonal factors such as Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) and insulin resistance. 2,7,8 PLMS is distinct from perceived low milk supply where the mother has an unfounded belief that she is not producing enough milk 9 and secondary low milk supply , arising from poor breastfeeding management. 10 PLMS is currently not listed among the conditions that are deemed by the WHO and UNICEF as acceptable medical reasons for the use of breastmilk substitutes. 11 There has been a growing awareness of the importance of understanding the emotional impact of difficult breastfeeding experiences 12,13 and how psychological well-being is linked to breastfeeding “success” or “failure” 14,15 Recent studies have highlighted the practical challenges and emotional impact of having PLMS among breastfeeding mothers. 16,17,18 Regardless of the reasons why breastfeeding may be challenging, evidence indicates that when women receive appropriate breastfeeding support, the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding is increased. 19,20,21 The manner in which HCPs provide breastfeeding support and engage with mothers also matters. 22 Negative breastfeeding experiences in the first week increase the incidence of low breastfeeding self-efficacy 23 and receiving conflicting information can have a negative impact on mothers. 24 Recent studies have called for individualised and evidence-based breastfeeding support for specific issues including low milk supply and consistency in the advice given by HCPs 16,24, . Furthermore, efforts to help mothers overcome lactational challenges and to understand lactation failure have been listed among the priorities for breastfeeding research 25 . Many mothers in Ireland are dissatisfied with the quality of breastfeeding support that they receive, pointing to a lack of individualised support, difficulties in accessing help and support that is inadequate for specific challenges 26,27 . Furthermore, significant gaps have been identified in the provision of breastfeeding education for HCPs in Ireland. 28,29,30, Voluntary and peer breastfeeding support is widely regarded as playing an important role in helping mothers reach their breastfeeding goals and have their social needs met. 31,32 However, a potential weakness of these studies is that they are based on the experiences of women who choose to engage with voluntary and peer support services. It is possible that the needs of women who choose not to engage with these supports are missed. The present study of women’s experiences of breastfeeding with PLMS is an attempt to engage with women’s lived experiences of accessing breastfeeding support with the goal of adding to the existing body of work on breastfeeding difficulties. While four superordinate themes were identified in the broader study, just one of these themes, Being with Others , is addressed in this article. Being with Others is an analysis of the participants’ experiences of interactions with HCPs, IBCLC (International Board Certified Lactation Consultants), support groups, and partners as they endeavoured to breastfeed. 2. Methods Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) 33 was used to explore the lived experiences of women in Ireland who are breastfeeding with PLMS. IPA is a seven-step qualitative research methodology concerned with revealing new insights about how individuals experience and make sense of phenomena 34 . Three key areas of philosophical knowledge namely, phenomenology, hermeneutics and idiography 33 inform the epistemological foundation of IPA. Phenomenology is concerned with revealing the meaning that participants derived from their lived experiences, hermeneutics guides the researcher’s interpretation of the data, and idiography relates to the detail and uniqueness of each participant’s experience 33 . IPA is considered useful for exploring topics that have emotional dimensions 35 and for under-researched phenomena or perspectives. 36 2.1 Setting This study took place in Ireland, where there are only 58 dedicated infant feeding positions in the public health maternity services, serving a population where 58,443 babies were born in 2021. 37 Eight of the nine participants in this study accessed the services of private IBCLCs, while just one was referred to an HSE community IBCLC. 2.2 Participants and Recruitment Purposive sampling was used to recruit nine participants. The sample size in IPA studies of this type tends to be small to allow for a detailed and in-depth exploration of participants’ lived experiences of the phenomenon being studied, rather than data that aims to be statistically significant. 36 What matters is the richness of data, the depth of analysis, and the homogeneity of the sample. 38 Recruitment was via social media. Mothers who met the inclusion criteria were invited to contact the main researcher (CW) by email. These criteria were as follows: (i) being over 18 years of age, (ii) having breastfed their baby for at least four months, (iii) had PLMS identified by an IBCLC or HCP, and (iv) having a baby of less than two years of age. The criterion of having breastfed for a minimum of four months was determined by the need to allow a reasonable timeframe to establish breastfeeding, and for PLMS to be identified. Within two weeks of initiating recruitment, 32 women made contact with the researcher (CW) and the first nine who met the inclusion criteria were selected. Initial telephone contact was made to initiate rapport and to schedule an interview. Prior to giving birth all participants had intended to breastfeed exclusively. The characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1 . Table 1 Participant Profile Pseudonym Age Age of baby at time of interview Breastfeeding Duration Reported cause of PLMS 1 Caroline 33 11 mths 5 mths PPH, PCOS 2 Fiona 37 11 mths 9 mths IGT 3 Megan 40 16 mths 11 mths IGT and PCOS 4 Amy 31 13 mths 5 mths IGT, Familial Alactogenesis 5 Sinead 32 11 mths 10 mths IGT 6 Kate 34 14 mths 14 mths + IGT 7 Orla 32 10 mths 10 mths + Hypothyroidism, possible IGT, Familial Alactogenesis 8 Ruth 36 9 mths 9 mths + IGT, Familial Alactogenesis 9 Donna 38 24 mths 18 mths IGT PPH, Postpartum Haemorrhage. PCOS, Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. IGT, Insufficient Glandular Tissue 2.3 Data Collection Interviews were conducted between April and October 2021 via Zoom and lasted between 55 and 75 minutes. The interviews were loosely structured around an interview guide that covered topics such as the motivation to breastfeed, experiences with breastfeeding, the practical and emotional impacts of having PLMS, and supports accessed. Participants were eager to share their experiences and were very engaged in the topic. Interviews were audio recorded and stored in compliance with General Data Protection Regulation. Written informed consent was provided by participants prior to interview. Participants were assigned pseudonyms and identifying information was removed. It was anticipated that talking about their challenges with breastfeeding might trigger difficult emotions for participants. Ahead of the interviews, participants were advised that if they felt emotionally overwhelmed, the interview could be paused or terminated. While all participants became upset during interviews, they were happy to continue and complete the interview. 2.4 Reflexivity Reflexivity is a process used in qualitative research to increase the credibility of findings. 39 It enables researchers to become self-aware and understand their influence on the research, and to consider how these might be minimised 40 . The first author (CW) was cognisant of her dual role both as a researcher and an IBCLC. She was aware of how being perceived by participants as an insider could influence the data, and was conscious of the fact that as a mother who breastfed her three children, she would bring a certain nuanced understanding of participants’ experience to the process. Specific techniques that the first author employed to bring reflexivity to the research were (i) keeping a journal to allow for meaningful reflection, (ii) seeing a psychotherapist every six weeks to debrief, (iii) engaging with the principles of hermeneutic phenomenology prescribed by IPA, (iv) engaging regularly with supervisors to limit the subjectivity of interpretations and (v) writing interpretative summaries after each interview. Writing interpretative summaries provided awareness of subjective responses to the data and potential to influence the research. 2.5 Data Analysis Data analysis was performed by following the steps prescribed by IPA: ( 1 ) Becoming deeply engaged in the world of the participant by careful reading and re-reading of the transcripts. Transcribing the audio recordings also gave the main researcher (C.W.) an opportunity to become fully immersed in the participants’ accounts of their experiences, and to pay close attention to the nuances of tone of voice and syntax. ( 2 ) Making initial observations, facilitated by a table with transcribed text copied to a column in the table, and then unpacking the text to expose its language, semantics and content in a second column. ( 3 ) Identifying themes from the initial observations and actively connecting the data to the researcher’s ideas, interpretations and reflections. ( 4 ) Searching for links across emerging themes. ( 5 ) Progressing to the next transcript and repeating steps 1–4. Each time the researcher moved to the next interview, it was important to be mindful of a tendency to want to find themes that had already been identified in previous interviews. ( 6 ) Scrutinising and documenting trends, themes and sub-ordinate themes across all nine cases. ( 7 ) Advancing to a more refined and in-depth level of interpretation of the data. Interpretative summaries after each interview as this was found to provide a means of getting closer to the data and engaging in a phenomenological way with the emergence of themes and interpretations. 3. Results Four superordinate themes were identified in this study namely: Being in the Whirlwind, Being with Others, Reimagining Motherhood and Embodiment . This article focuses on Being with Others . The title of this superordinate theme comes from Heidegger’s concept that individuals experience themselves in a world with and through other people, and that their self-understanding is interwoven with the self-understandings of others. 41 As participants experienced the phenomenon of PLMS, they had to engage with HCPs, IBCLCs, peer and voluntary supporters and partners. The interactions that participants had with these various others shaped how they viewed and experienced themselves, and how they derived meaning from being a mother with PLMS. The subthemes addressed here are Disconnected Encounters, Perceiving Judgement from Others, Being in a Safe Space and Having a Savior . 3.1 Disconnected Encounters This subtheme considers how participants experienced a lack of meaningful connection in encounters with people providing professional and voluntary breastfeeding support, and how these encounters resulted in them feeling that they were not being heard. While in hospital, most participants felt that the focus of midwives was their baby’s latch and that concerns they expressed about milk supply were dismissed. As a result, participants felt vulnerable and unseen, and had the impression that staff were not attuned to how important breastfeeding was to them: I didn’t really have any support in the hospital…the midwives would just take a quick glance and say “the latch is fine”… [Caroline] I tried to express colostrum….I didn’t know what I was doing, the midwife tried to show me but she was really busy….I brought what I had to the nurses, they were just…“that’s nothing, that’s no good to him… [Sinead] Recalling these encounters evoked sadness and anger for participants. Megan became quite distressed when she recalled an interaction she had with a paediatrician after it was discovered that her baby was not gaining weight: …he said, I’ll never forget it “oh she must have been starving” and that just [voice breaks, crying], that hurt me so much…I interpreted that as him saying I was trying to starve my baby [sobbing, deeply upset]. Some participants were also unhappy about how HCPs and IBCLCs communicated information about PLMS and IGT to them. Being told these conditions are rare or uncommon made them feel alone and marginalised: I asked her if it was common and she said “maybe I have one every couple of years”…It just made me feel more alone. I just think people who specialize in it, it would be helpful if they had more compassion and knew a bit more about it. [Sinead] Another aspect of breastfeeding support in hospital that some participants mentioned was unwelcome hands-on support from midwives. At a time when participants were vulnerable and anxious, this insensitive care increased their anxiety: …she is one of those people who tries to get her hands in, it was such an invasion of my personal space, I felt violated by her, she was so uncaring. I didn’t ask for her to do that. She didn’t know what she was doing anyway [angry tone of voice]. [Megan] Participants described very unsatisfactory interactions with PHNs. Kate regarded her PHN’s attitude as not only unreasonable and unhelpful, but a threat to her sense of agency: The PHN got so annoyed with me for going to an IBCLC…she was being a huge pain, and I was like…“look I am just doing what I can to get the support I need…it’s my choice who I go to… [annoyed and exasperated]. I was so frustrated, it was such a head-wreck…all added stress. I was just trying to make breastfeeding work. [Kate] Ruth also had a deeply upsetting experience with her PHN which left her feeling objectified and humiliated. She described a meeting with the PHN her in her local health centre and became very upset as she recounted what was said to her: I was just a new mom…and you know you are not used to feeding in front of strangers…and she looked at me and said “you have a very large gap between your breasts”, direct like that and kind of cold which automatically just made me feel like a freak…..I said I was feeding her all the time, …and she said “well that is because she is starving”... [Ruth] There was clearly a lack of empathetic connection between Ruth and the PHN, and an apparent lack of awareness on the part of the PHN of Ruth’s vulnerability. Furthermore, Ruth interpreted the comment that her baby was “starving” as an implication she was negligent as a mother. One of the difficulties participants perceived in breastfeeding support groups was the attitude that there is no such thing as low milk supply. Amy describes her reaction to comments in a Facebook group and Orla recounts her experience of attending a La Leche League group: …someone commented about low supply and most of the comments were “there’s no such thing, you just latch your baby and your supply will build up and don’t believe anyone saying you have low supply.” It made me angry. [Amy] I was talking to La Leche League and the ladies were just telling me “just put him on the boob, don’t worry, the milk will come in, don’t give him formula at all…” [Orla] Like other participants, Amy and Orla appeared to be very attuned to others’ opinions about low milk supply and angry that their concerns were dismissed. They internalised the message to keep breastfeeding as dismissive and undermining. 3.2 Perceiving Judgement from Others In social settings, many participants feared judgement from others. They felt different, they were embarrassed about giving infant formula and they felt a need to explain to people why they were not exclusively breastfeeding. This could be interpreted as internalised stigma - an awareness of others’ perception of an “undesirable difference” in them that makes them feel that they are falling short of what they ought to be. Many participants described feeling self-conscious and even ashamed about giving their babies infant formula in social settings and expressed that they felt a need to explain to people why they were not exclusively breastfeeding. They gave the impression that formula-feeding in public undermined their sense of who they were as a mother: I feel a little bit ashamed with people seeing me formula feed her…And sometimes I over-share, I might say “oh she is combination fed”, I feel like have to say it…I don’t know, that’s just my own problem. [Ruth] I always want to tell people about the IGT…then it’s “that’s why I’m not breastfeeding”…it’s just, I’m still a breastfeeding mum even though I’m not breastfeeding, or whatever that is. [Caroline] Caroline strongly identifies breastfeeding as inseparable from her identity as a mother and craves acknowledgement that she had a difficult time breastfeeding: I need to opportunity to talk about it or you kind of want it acknowledged… [Caroline is crying]. Megan used an at-breast supplementer and explained how she felt using this in front of other mothers. She portrays herself as vulnerable and self-conscious, unable to understand why her body cannot make enough milk for her baby yet feeling obliged to explain to others why she was feeding this way: …they weren’t rude about it but they were like “what is that?” [tone and facial expression of disgust]…“and you’re breastfeeding her, and there’s formula and a tube?”, they were trying to be nice about it but it wasn’t something they had ever been exposed to. Having to explain it when I didn’t even know why I had to do it… Rather than give their babies infant formula in front of other people, some participants chose not to as they did not want people to know they had low milk supply. Donna described attending a breastfeeding support group and leaving when she knew her baby needed extra milk, rather than giving him formula in front of the other mothers: I couldn’t fully participate in some of the things because I was supplementing…it was totally my perception. It was shame, probably a little strong. But this is the dirty laundry piece. Not wanting people to know or to see that I couldn’t fully feed him. There was always a coffee after the breastfeeding group, and I remember looking at my baby thinking he’s hungry and…I just wasn’t willing to feed him the bottle in front of other people, having emptied both breasts. It sounds totally idiotic when I look back, but all I should have said was I have low supply but in a group of people who had all successfully achieved supply for their children I couldn’t do that. Donna felt that she was falling short of a level of achievement which she believed all the other mothers at the group had attained. She feared judgement for not exclusively breastfeeding and compared having PLMS to having “dirty laundry” – something to be hidden or ashamed of. The consequence of this internalised feeling of stigma for Donna was isolation from the other mothers. Some participants recalled experiences of being in a large breastfeeding support group on Facebook. The perceived negative attitudes towards the use of infant formula and scepticism about low milk supply made them feel stigmatised and angry. Both Amy and Sinead subsequently left this group: I think there’s a lot of hatred for combination feeding in that group because it is seen like “oh you just want a break from breastfeeding” or “you just don’t want to do night feeds” or “you’re just not committed to it.”…it made me angry …. [Amy] …I feel that there is a sense of being really skeptical of people who say they have low supply and they don’t know what it is to triple feed…and always be obsessing about your supply…, and how much formula did you give. [Sinead] Kate described not being able to breastfeed exclusively as being like denied admission to an “exclusive” club. This analogy is representative of how participants experienced having PLMS. Kate highlighted a common perception that mothers either breastfeed or formula feed, and asserts that she did not fall into either of these categories, rather, she was “in-between:” I hate the word ‘exclusive’ it’s like it’s this exclusive club that I’m not in, you know what I mean? I’m like yeah it makes it seem like it is all or nothing. And it can be all or nothing, but there is lots in-between. 3.3 Being in a Safe Space This section discusses experiences of peer-support from other mothers with PLMS. Four of the participants were members of a WhatsApp support group for mothers experiencing breastfeeding difficulties called The Purple Hearts group. Most of the women in this group had PLMS. Two of the participants joined a low milk supply support group on Facebook. They reported similar experiences of being in these groups. The one benefit they stressed above all others was that of being understood, and therefore validated: ….you’re in this weird middle space where you’re not exclusively breastfeeding, they’re women who have had to do it… they get what it’s like. [Megan] ….they accepted me into the Low Milk Supply group, and ...I was so overwhelmed because I was like “this is actually a thing!” [excited tone]…other people have this…I started reading other people’s posts…that was a real changing point for me in my journey. Just like life-changing…. My journey would have been much worse if it hadn’t been for that Facebook group. [Sinead] …it felt really good to be connected with other women who know this is important to me as a mum. [Fiona] Being in these groups helped the participants come to terms with having PLMS. The understanding and empathy they described contrasts with the lack of understanding they reported in their interactions with HCPs. Megan became emotional as she elaborated about what it was like to feel that she was in a “safe space” among people who had had similar experiences: …people who get that grief, who understand the challenges and practicalities of that…there are people who have been through similar things, who’ll say “I’ve tried this, or people who are a bit further down the road who can say ”yeah I went through that it was so hard”. For new mums to the group everyone really rallies round and says “you’re doing so well keep going”…it’s just really compassionate people...[starts crying]…it’s just a really safe space. [Megan] Another aspect of being supported by other women with PLMS was reassurance that they were not on their own: …hearing different women’s problems and hearing the hardship that they had to go through…gave me a sense of belonging and then knowing that you’re not the only one…you feel listened to. [Orla] Hearing other women’s stories appeared to give participants greater insight into their own experience of having PLMS and a realisation of how much effort they had invested in breastfeeding. Being in the groups served to hold up a mirror to them and helped them develop a greater sense of self and a stronger motherhood self-identity – an identity which had previously been shattered by having PLMS: …when you talk to all of those women…you realise we do five hundred percent more than the women whose baby latches ok. [Orla] ….when I see new people join, I see a lot of myself in them when they are talking, and I’m thinking “I can remember feeling exactly how you feel.”… [Amy] …being able to give advice to other mums kind of made me realise how far we have come. I remember one of the women…her baby was maybe five weeks and she just looked so sad, it was like looking in a mirror… and I could just relate so much, she looked exhausted and so sad and frustrated and…it made me realise we have come a long way.”. [Fiona] Kate, Ruth and Donna spoke about being supported by other mothers with PLMS. Their reflections echoed the comments of the participants who were in online groups, in that they gained insight and self-acceptance through seeing their experiences mirrored in the experiences of others. These encounters seemed to represent a significant shift in how they understood and perceived themselves: You know what I found really supportive? I have a neighbour with IGT… and she found it very detrimental to her mental health… she was just someone that actually knew what I was going through, yeah invaluable…. [Ruth] …she was kind of like me, she really wanted to make breastfeeding work and she did the best she could…she was like “look, you have to know that just because you have low supply it doesn’t make you any less of a mom”. She was really supportive. She had gone through something similar. [Kate] I kind of feel an affiliation with her because she had the low supply as well. [Donna] 3.4 Having a Saviour Participants identified two main sources of invaluable help and support as they struggled with the challenges of breastfeeding with PLMS, their IBCLCs and their partners. They credited IBCLCs with providing skilled and empathetic support that helped them continue breastfeeding and come to terms with having PLMS. Participants also described how their partners gave them practical help and emotional support. Caroline described her HSE community IBCLC as an “absolute lifesaver”, and Kate credited her private practice IBCLC with being the “saviour” of her breastfeeding relationship: ….she was fantastic and was my main support for the remainder of my breastfeeding journey…she an absolute lifesaver, I wouldn’t have breastfed for as long without her… [Caroline] My lactation consultant was the savior of our breastfeeding relationship. [Kate] Participants stressed the importance of the empathy and emotional support that they received from their IBCLCs, giving the impression that it was as important as the practical support to continue breastfeeding: It would have been a very different journey if I hadn’t had someone who understood completely and was empathetic. She didn’t just support me with breastfeeding, she supported me emotionally at times as well. And that was so important. No one else had any knowledge about it, apart from my lactation consultant. [Amy] Another aspect of the support IBCLCs provided to participants was helping them to understand the embodied nature of breastfeeding, that it is more than a means of providing milk, and that having PLMS can be experienced as a loss: She put into words, what I didn’t realise I felt, you know like not being able to breastfeed fully…can be viewed as a loss. And that breastfeeding is about so much more than feeding your baby, and that it’s a connection, it’s bonding. But I didn’t know that. [Ruth] The participants stressed how much they valued being listened to by their IBCLCs. This and being emotionally supported are in stark contrast to participants’ earlier experiences in maternity settings of feeling unseen and unsupported: ….that felt like the first time someone was really listening to what we were saying… I felt supported. [Megan] The participants’ partners also played an important role in providing support. At a practical level, they helped with preparing bottles and minding the baby while participants rested or pumped: I have the most supportive husband on the planet. He was flat out running and getting me bottles and like sterilizing things, and washing bottles… [Kate] ….he would put her in the sling and work away in his office and she’d be asleep on him, and that was my chance to have a rest or whatever. That was absolutely fundamental, it is not possible to do this without somebody. [Caroline] The participants credited their partners with giving them encouragement when they were finding breastfeeding difficult and with being a source of ongoing emotional support. When Ruth spoke about her partnerd, she described him as a steadying and calm presence, who encouraged her to just do what she could without pressuring or discouraging her. She said he helped her to rationalise things and to see her situation more objectively, while also understanding that breastfeeding mattered to her: ….he admired the effort that went into it and never pushed me to keep going, he wasn’t pro-formula, like just formula feed and not think what that would mean for me. He would say “just give her what you can” and would help me to rationalise things and just to realise that he was there for me. [Ruth] The participants also reflected on the role their partners played in helping them to appreciate how much effort they had put into breastfeeding, giving them a clearer perspective on their experience of having PLMS: He knew how much it meant to me, and he tried to reassure me that I was doing a good job no matter how much I got or if I took a break, but like, “look at everything you are giving to him, look at how well he’s doing. [Amy] Kate became emotional when she talked about how her partner supported her and how he had so much faith in her. She gave the impression that he was a calm and wise presence throughout her breastfeeding journey, who had an unconditional belief in Kate’s ability to care for her baby, despite Kate’s own misgivings: I’m going to cry now thinking about how well my husband supported me, not that I could ever love him more. It has made us so much stronger. He was never like ‘oh maybe you should switch to formula’, he was always supportive of what I wanted to do and like, he knew that somewhere deep inside I knew what she needed. [Kate] 4. Discussion This study provides valuable insights into how mothers with PLMS experienced breastfeeding support from HCPs, IBCLCs, and peer and voluntary supports. It also reveals how crucial that practical and emotional support from partners was to participants. Four subordinate themes were developed: Disconnected Encounters, Perceiving Judgement from Others, Being in a Safe Space and Having a Saviour . The encounters of participants with HCPs in the early postpartum period were largely unhelpful. These negative encounters were rooted in a perceived lack of rapport or connection between the HCP and the breastfeeding mother, unwanted and intrusive physical support, an apparent insensitivity to how important breastfeeding was to the mothers and that HCPs lacked knowledge about PLMS. These findings corroborate previous studies that explored experiences of breastfeeding support 27,42,43 and echo a recent study which found that women with PLMS were dissatisfied with support received from HCPs. 16 An impediment to rapport evident in the participants’ accounts of their interactions with HCPs was their heightened sensitivity to language and the way in which information was conveyed. Participants internalised remarks from HCPs as dehumanising, as a threat to their sense of agency and as calling into question their ability to care for their babies. These findings align with those of Spannhake et al. 44 who called for sensitivity and understanding on the part of HCPs when interacting with mothers with breastfeeding problems and are consistent with research that mothers experience hands-on breastfeeding support as intrusive. 45,46,47 Our study also echoes evidence that greater consideration should be given to the relationship between breastfeeding experiences and maternal identity. 48,49,50 In terms of voluntary and peer breastfeeding support, the women in this study were dissatisfied with their experiences of face-to-face and online groups. They perceived a scepticism around the existence of PLMS and felt that their concerns were dismissed. They also perceived that they were being judged for using infant formula and that this led to an internalised feeling of stigma. While many studies support the importance of voluntary and peer support for breastfeeding mothers 19,20,32,51 , there has been very little exploration of the notion that they might not necessarily be a one-size-fits-all solution for mothers with specific breastfeeding difficulties such as PLMS. In contrast to the participants’ encounters with HCPs, their experiences with IBCLCs were overwhelmingly positive. They valued the knowledge of IBCLCs and credited them with enabling them to continue breastfeeding, with some referring to their IBCLCs as “the saviour of our breastfeeding relationship” and “an absolute lifesaver”. Participants valued the sensitive and empathetic manner with which IBCLCs delivered support, and the way they helped them appreciate the more nuanced aspects of being a breastfeeding mother. Many participants expressed how their IBCLCs facilitated acceptance of PLMS. These results are consistent with studies that identified the importance of individualised support, sensitivity from HCPs and respectful, mutual dialogue 52,53 and evidence that IBCLC support in the postpartum period has the potential to improve breastfeeding outcomes 54,55 . Our findings reflect the need to move away from viewing breastfeeding support through a purely biomedical lens and to place greater emphasis on person-centered emotional and psychological support for breastfeeding mothers 43,56 . Little has been reported about the role of IBCLCs in providing this kind of emotional and psychological support. Indeed, in a position paper on the role and impact of IBCLCs, 57 neither emotional nor psychological support were included among the nine roles that were suggested for IBCLCs. A more recent paper has highlighted the need for more research on the impact of the IBCLC in inpatient and hospital settings. 55 The participants valued and were grateful for the encouragement and support that they received from their partners. They experienced this support as non-judgemental, unconditional, and fundamental to being able to continue breastfeeding with PLMS. Despite the challenges that PLMS presented for the participants and their partners, there was no evidence of tension or discord. Rather, they gave the impression that they adapted well as a couple to the challenges of breastfeeding with PLMS and one participant even expressed that the experience made their relationship stronger. Our finding that women credited the support of their partners with them being able to continue breastfeeding is consistent with previous studies which have identified the importance of partner support to feelings of breastfeeding self-efficacy and to an duration of breastfeeding. 58 One unexpected finding of the current study was the degree of internalised stigma that resulted from the participants’ encounters at peer and voluntary support groups. Internalised stigma is an “undesirable difference” in the eyes of others that undermines a person’s identity, or the feeling of falling short of what one ought to be. 59 The phenomenon represents what many of the participants experienced in the company of other breastfeeding mothers. They described how they did not want other breastfeeding mothers to see them give formula to their babies, feeling shame when they did so, and not understanding why they felt this way. A probable is that formula-feeding did not align with participants’ internalised self-identity as a breastfeeding mother. This hypothesis is supported by feminist literature which contends that breastfeeding can be conceived of as a public display of one’s chosen way to mother, of showing the world who you are. 60 Not being able to conform and breastfeed exclusively in front of other mothers resulted in some participants leaving social gatherings early to avoid being seen bottle-feeding, being embarrassed using a supplemental nursing system, and feeling a need to explain to people why they were giving formula. These encounters made mothers feel ashamed and isolated and echo previous research which used the term “failing before the other” to describe women’s experiences of unsuccessful attempts to breastfeed in the presence of other people. 61 Another surprising finding of the current research was the degree to which the participants valued and benefitted from the support of others with PLMS. Seven of the nine participants received help and/or support from others with PLMS via social media groups or their own social contacts. They variously described this support as like “being in a safe space” and “feeling less alone”. The women valued the sense they had of feeling understood and of being among others who “get what it’s like”. Being among other women with PLMS appeared to give the participants a greater degree of self-understanding. One participant described hearing other women talk about their experiences as like “looking in a mirror” and another described how seeing newer members join the group helped her realise how far she had come. Another participant even described her first contact with a low milk supply support group as a “turning point” in her journey. Peer and voluntary breastfeeding supports are widely accepted as being important for most mothers. 32,51 However, these studies tend to consider peer and voluntary support as generic and do not consider the possible value of problem-specific breastfeeding support. One study which explored women’s embodied experiences during breastfeeding, reported that mothers experienced profound relief when they came across other mothers who had had similar experiences to them. 50 The mothers in the study said that being with other mothers who had had similar experiences alleviated their sense of defectiveness and gave them a sense of having a “safe space” in which they were able to talk about their experiences. Similarly, Spannhake et al . 44 found that some of the emotional burden of breastfeeding difficulties was relieved by having contact with and sharing experiences with other women having similar problems. Our finding that participants benefitted from the support of others with PLMS is consistent with these studies. It also supports the theory that when people are faced with challenging life events, they seek belonging with “like-minded allies” and that doing so enables them to create meaning and a capacity for transcendence. 62 We conclude that there is a need for greater knowledge among midwives and other HCPs of PLMS as a condition and the importance of referring these mothers to an IBCLC. Our findings also suggest that HCPs who provide breastfeeding support in maternity and community settings receive enhanced communication training to help them deliver support in a sensitive and empathic manner. They would also benefit from further education on the more nuanced aspects of breastfeeding, such as how it can impact on motherhood self-identity and emotional well-being. In regard to voluntary and peer support for mothers with PLMS, we suggest that where possible, they be directed to groups for women experiencing breastfeeding difficulties and/or PLMS. Conclusion Our findings reveal a need for a greater emphasis on sensitive, individualised, person-centred care that is cognisant of the deeply personal way in which some women perceive breastfeeding, and their heightened sensitivity in relation to HCPs’ actions and words. There is a need for greater knowledge and understanding among HCPs of the phenomenon of PLMS so that women suspected of having the condition may be offered a referral to a lactation specialist. Furthermore, greater consideration should be given by HCPs providing breastfeeding support to women with PLMS to the important role of their partners in continued breastfeeding and in providing emotional support. Declarations Ethics The Human Research and Ethics Committee at the university at which the researchers are based granted ethical approval for the study. All participants were given written information about the study and the opportunity to ask questions before consenting to participate. Consent for Publication Not applicable. Competing Interests None of the authors have competing interests. Authors’ Information Corresponding author: Caoimhe Whelan [email protected] The first author (C.W.) is an International Board-Certified Lactation Consultant working in private practice. She was acutely aware of the emotional and practical challenges faced by mothers with Primary Low Milk Supply and so she conceived of the idea to undertake research on their experiences of breastfeeding with this phenomenon. This led her to undertaking an MSc. by research at University College Dublin. C.W.’s goal was to publish findings that would be used to shape policy and guidelines related to the provision of support for mothers with Primary Low Milk Supply. Funding The first author self-funded her MSc. by research. Author Contribution C.W. conducted the research and wrote the main manuscript. D.O.B and A.H. provided supervision and reviewed the main manuscript. Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of the nine women who participated in this study. Availability of Data and Materials The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. References World Health Organisation. 2023. Exclusive breastfeeding for optimal growth, development and health of infants. Accessed on 23 Mar 2024: ( https://www.who.int/tools/elena/interventions/exclusive-breastfeeding) . Farah E, Barger MK, Klima C, Rossman B, Hershberger P. Impaired lactation: review of delayed lactogenesis and insufficient lactation. J Midwifery Women's Health. 2021;66(5):631–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13274 . Galipeau R, Dumas L, Lepage M. Perception of not having enough milk and actual milk production of first-time breastfeeding mothers: is there a difference? Breastfeed Med. 2017;12(4):210–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2016.0183 . Kam RL, Amir LH, Cullinane M. Is there an association between breast hypoplasia and breastfeeding outcomes? A systematic review. Breastfeed Med. 2021;16(8):594–602. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2021.0032 . Huggins K, Petok E, Mireles O. Markers of lactation insufficiency: a study of 34 mothers. Curr issues Clin lactation. 2000;1:25–35. Neifert MR, Seacat JM, Jobe WE. Lactation failure due to insufficient glandular development of the breast. Pediatrics. 1985;76(5):823–8. Nommsen-Rivers LA, Wagner EA, Roznowski DM, Riddle SW, Ward LP, Thompson A. Measures of maternal metabolic health as predictors of severely low milk production. Breastfeed Med. 2022;17(7):566–76. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2021.0292 . Glover AV, Berry DC, Schwartz TA, Stuebe AM. The association of metabolic dysfunction with breastfeeding outcomes in gestational diabetes. Am J Perinatol. 2018;35(14):1339–45. 10.1055/s-0038-1626713 . Kent JC, Ashton E, Hardwick CM, Rea A, Murray K, Geddes DT. Causes of perception of insufficient milk supply in Western Australian mothers. Maternal & child nutrition. 2021;17(1):e13080, Deurzen-Smith V. Everyday mysteries: Existential dimensions of psychotherapy. (No Title). 1997. Hale TFH, Peter E. Hale and Hartmann's Textbook of Human Lactation. First ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2017. World Health Organization. (2009) ‘Acceptable medical reasons for use of breast-milk substitutes’. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/69938/WHO_FCH_CAH_09.01_eng.pdf?sequence=1 [Accessed 23 May 2024]. Brown A, Rance J, Bennett P. Understanding the relationship between breastfeeding and postnatal depression: the role of pain and physical difficulties. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(2):273–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12832 . Gregory EF, Butz AM, Ghazarian SR, Gross SM, Johnson SB. Are unmet breastfeeding expectations associated with maternal depressive symptoms? Acad Pediatr. 2015;15(3):319–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2014.12.003 . Williamson I, Leeming D, Lyttle S, Johnson S. It should be the most natural thing in the world’: Exploring first-time mothers' breastfeeding difficulties in the UK using audio‐diaries and interviews. Matern Child Nutr. 2012;8(4):434–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00328.x . Harrison LN, Chin A, Neiterman E. Failure to Feed: Women’s Experiences of Breastfeeding and the Implications for Health Promotion Practice. Women's Reproductive Health. 2021;8(3):173–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2021.1973844 . Kam RL, Bennetts SK, Cullinane M, Amir LH. I didn’t want to let go of the dream: Exploring women’s personal stories of how their low milk supply was discovered. Sex Reproductive Healthc. 2024;40:100953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2024.100953 . Whelan C, O'Brien D, Hyde A. Mother's Emotional Experiences of Breastfeeding with Primary Low Milk Supply in the First Four Months Postpartum: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Breastfeed Med. 2024;19(3):197–207. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2023.0231 . Farah E, Klima C, Rossman B, McFarlin B, Hershberger P. It's Not All or Nothing: Understanding How Women with Lactation Failure Experience Breastfeeding. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s 2019 Sep 1 (Vol. 64, No. 5, pp. 674–674). McFadden A, Gavine A, Renfrew MJ, Wade A, Buchanan P, Taylor JL, Veitch E, Rennie AM, Crowther SA, Neiman S, MacGillivray S. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane database Syst reviews. 2017;2 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub5 . Trickey H, Thomson G, Grant A, Sanders J, Mann M, Murphy S, Paranjothy S. A realist review of one-to‐one breastfeeding peer support experiments conducted in developed country settings. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(1):e12559. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12559 . Theodorah DZ, Mc’Deline RN. The kind of support that matters to exclusive breastfeeding a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03590-2 . Nilsson IM, Kronborg H, Rahbek K, Strandberg-Larsen K. The significance of early breastfeeding experiences on breastfeeding self‐efficacy one week postpartum. Matern Child Nutr. 2020;16(3):e12986. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12986 . Fraser M, Dowling S, Oxford L, Ellis N, Jones M. Important times for breastfeeding support: a qualitative study of mothers’ experiences. Int J Health Promotion Educ. 2020;58(2):71–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2019.1676811 . Blixt I, Johansson M, Hildingsson I, Papoutsi Z, Rubertsson C. Women’s advice to healthcare professionals regarding breastfeeding:offer sensitive individualized breastfeeding support-an interview study. Int Breastfeed J. 2019;14:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-019-0247-4 . Azad MB, Nickel NC, Bode L, Brockway M, Brown A, Chambers C, et al. Breastfeeding and the origins of health: Interdisciplinary perspectives and priorities. Matern Child Nutr. 2021;17(2):e13109. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13109 . Lawlor N, Prihodova L, Byrne D, Etherton M, Rahill F, Wilson C. at al. A qualitative analysis of women’s postnatal experiences of breastfeeding supports during the perinatal period in Ireland. Plos one. 2023;18(7):e0288230, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288230 . Murphy R, Foley C, Verling AM, O'Carroll T, Flynn R, Rohde D. Women's experiences of initiating feeding shortly after birth in Ireland: A secondary analysis of quantitative and qualitative data from the National Maternity Experience Survey. Midwifery. 2022;107:103263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103263 . McGuinness D, Ni Mhurchu S, Frazer K, Bhardwaj N, Cornally P, Cantwell M, et al. A co-designed evaluation study to identify Breastfeeding Knowledge of General Practitioners’ and Practice Nurses’. Health Promot Int. 2024;39(2):daae021. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae021 . Walsh A, McCluskey R, Cassidy D, McGoldrick G, Howlin C, Muldoon K, et al. The Support Needs and Current Practices of Public Health Nurses in the Republic of Ireland Who Provide Support to Breastfeeding Mothers: A Cross-Sectional Survey. J Hum Lactation. 2023;39(4):733–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231172991 . Dunne S, Fallon A. Public health nurses' experiences of supporting women to breastfeed in community settings in Ireland. J Health Visiting. 2020;8(6):240–6. https://doi.org/10.12968/johv.2020.8.6.240 . Quinn EM, Gallagher L, de Vries J. A qualitative exploration of breastfeeding support groups in Ireland from the women's perspectives. Midwifery. 2019;78:71–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.08.001 . Chang YS, Beake S, Kam J, Lok KY, Bick D. Views and experiences of women, peer supporters and healthcare professionals on breastfeeding peer support: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Midwifery. 2022;108:103299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103299 . Larkin M, Flowers P, Smith JA. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Larkin M, Flowers P, Smith JA. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Sage Publications: United Kingdom; 2021. pp. 1–11. Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative Research in Health Care. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2020. Peat G, Rodriguez A, Smith J. Interpretive phenomenological analysis applied to healthcare research. Evid Based Nurs. 2019;22(1):7–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2018-103017 . Central Statistics Office. 2023. Vital Statistics Yearly Summary. Accessed on 23 May 2024: ( https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-vsys/vitalstatisticsyearlysummary2021/ ). Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523 . Dodgson JE. Reflexivity in qualitative research. J Hum lactation. 2019;35(2):220–2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419830990 . Clancy M. Is reflexivity the key to minimising problems of interpretation in phenomenological research? Nurse Res. 2013;20(6). Heidegger M. Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell; 1967. Hennessy M, Byrne M, Laws R, Heary C. They just need to come down a little bit to your level: a qualitative study of parents’ views and experiences of early life interventions to promote healthy growth and associated behaviours. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10):3605. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103605 . Taylor AM, van Teijlingen E, Ryan KM, Alexander J. Scrutinised, judged and sabotaged’: A qualitative video diary study of first-time breastfeeding mothers. Midwifery. 2019;75:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.04.004 . Spannhake M, Jansen C, Görig T, Diehl K. It Is a Very Emotional Topic for Me—Managing Breastfeeding Problems among German Mothers: A Qualitative Approach. InHealthcare 2021 Oct 11 (Vol. 9, No. 10, p. 1352). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101352 . Spencer R, Greatrex-White S, Fraser DM. I was meant to be able to do this’: A phenomenological study of women’s experiences of breastfeeding. Evid Based Midwifery. 2014;12(3):83–8. Palmér L, Carlsson G, Mollberg M, Nyström M. Severe breastfeeding difficulties: Existential lostness as a mother—Women's lived experiences of initiating breastfeeding under severe difficulties. Int J qualitative Stud health well-being. 2012;7(1):10846. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v7i0.10846 . Burns E, Fenwick J, Sheehan A, Schmied V. Mining for liquid gold: midwifery language and practices associated with early breastfeeding support. Matern Child Nutr. 2013;9(1):57–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00397.x . Edwards R, Cragg B, Dunn S, Peterson WE. The breastfeeding and early motherhood experiences of older first-time mothers: A constructivist grounded theory study. Midwifery. 2021;96:102945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.102945 . Kuswara K, Knight T, Campbell KJ, Hesketh KD, Zheng M, Bolton KA, Laws R. Breastfeeding and emerging motherhood identity: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of first time Chinese Australian mothers’ breastfeeding experiences. Women Birth. 2021;34(3):e292–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.03.005 . Watkinson M, Murray C, Simpson J. Maternal experiences of embodied emotional sensations during breast feeding: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Midwifery. 2016;36:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.019 . Ingram J, Thomson G, Johnson D, Clarke JL, Trickey H, Hoddinott P, et al. Women's and peer supporters' experiences of an assets-based peer support intervention for increasing breastfeeding initiation and continuation: A qualitative study. Health Expect. 2020;23(3):622–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13042 . Leeming D, Marshall J, Locke A. Understanding process and context in breastfeeding support interventions: The potential of qualitative research. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13(4):e12407. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12407 . Trickey H, Newburn M. Goals, dilemmas and assumptions in infant feeding education and support. Applying theory of constraints thinking tools to develop new priorities for action. Matern Child Nutr. 2014;10(1):72–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00417.x . Chetwynd EM, Wasser HM, Poole C. Breastfeeding support interventions by International Board Certified Lactation Consultants: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Hum Lactation. 2019;35(3):424–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419851482 . Haase B, Brennan E, Wagner CL. Effectiveness of the IBCLC: Have we made an impact on the care of breastfeeding families over the past decade? J Hum Lactation. 2019;35(3):441–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419851805 . Giannì ML, Lanzani M, Consales A, Bestetti G, Colombo L, Bettinelli ME, et al. Exploring the emotional breastfeeding experience of first-time mothers: implications for healthcare support. Front Pead. 2020;8:199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00199 . International Lactation Consultant Association. (2011). Position paper on the role and impact of the IBCLC. Accessed on 23 May 2024 ( https://portal.ilca.org/files/resources/ilca_publications/Role%20%20Impact%20of%20the%20IBCLC-webFINAL_08-15-11.pdf ). Ogbo FA, Akombi BJ, Ahmed KY, Rwabilimbo AG, Ogbo AO, Uwaibi NE, et al. Breastfeeding in the community—how can partners/fathers help? A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2):413. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020413 . Goffman E. Behavior in public places: notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free; 1963. Stearns CA. Breastfeeding and the Good Maternal Body. Gend Soc. 1999;13(3):308–25. Hanell L. The failing body: Narratives of breastfeeding troubles and shame. J Linguistic Anthropol. 2017;27(2):232–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12158 . Deurzen-Smith V. Everyday mysteries: Existential dimensions of psychotherapy. (No Title). 1997. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 27 Jan, 2025 Read the published version in International Breastfeeding Journal → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 10 Nov, 2024 Reviews received at journal 01 Nov, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 01 Nov, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 15 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 15 Oct, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 12 Oct, 2024 Reviews received at journal 09 Jul, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 27 Jun, 2024 Reviewers agreed at journal 23 Jun, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 21 Jun, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 14 Jun, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 14 Jun, 2024 First submitted to journal 10 Jun, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4560043","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":320682141,"identity":"ff0da49f-36b2-4f9b-8d06-fd2a3574112e","order_by":0,"name":"Caoimhe Whelan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University College Dublin","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Caoimhe","middleName":"","lastName":"Whelan","suffix":""},{"id":320682142,"identity":"0c00ae2b-775a-4779-bfc5-7d3922c89ff7","order_by":1,"name":"Denise O'Brien","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University College Dublin","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Denise","middleName":"","lastName":"O'Brien","suffix":""},{"id":320682143,"identity":"9424cdb9-1223-4f14-b90c-b3e065d04162","order_by":2,"name":"Abbey Hyde","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University College Dublin","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Abbey","middleName":"","lastName":"Hyde","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-06-10 20:53:14","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4560043/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4560043/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00699-4","type":"published","date":"2025-01-27T15:58:08+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":75351346,"identity":"ef666121-9016-48d2-9a99-aa567bad2dec","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-02-03 16:09:53","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":703818,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4560043/v1/5be4acea-b1cd-4a2c-9dbd-9001f4aba499.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Breastfeeding with Primary Low Milk Supply: A Phenomenological Exploration of Mother’s Lived Experiences of Professional and Peer Support","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eMost mothers produce enough milk to breastfeed exclusively in line with the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendations.\u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e However, a small cohort of women are prevented from doing so due to a phenomenon known as \u003cem\u003eprimary low milk supply\u003c/em\u003e (PLMS).\u003csup\u003e2,3\u003c/sup\u003e PLMS is an intrinsic condition which can be caused by mammary hypoplasia.\u003csup\u003e4,5,6\u003c/sup\u003e, metabolic disease or hormonal factors such as Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) and insulin resistance.\u003csup\u003e2,7,8\u003c/sup\u003e PLMS is distinct from \u003cem\u003eperceived low milk supply\u003c/em\u003e where the mother has an unfounded belief that she is not producing enough milk\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e and \u003cem\u003esecondary low milk supply\u003c/em\u003e, arising from poor breastfeeding management.\u003csup\u003e10\u003c/sup\u003e PLMS is currently not listed among the conditions that are deemed by the WHO and UNICEF as acceptable medical reasons for the use of breastmilk substitutes.\u003csup\u003e11\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere has been a growing awareness of the importance of understanding the emotional impact of difficult breastfeeding experiences\u003csup\u003e12,13\u003c/sup\u003e and how psychological well-being is linked to breastfeeding \u0026ldquo;success\u0026rdquo; or \u0026ldquo;failure\u0026rdquo;\u003csup\u003e14,15\u003c/sup\u003e Recent studies have highlighted the practical challenges and emotional impact of having PLMS among breastfeeding mothers.\u003csup\u003e16,17,18\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegardless of the reasons why breastfeeding may be challenging, evidence indicates that when women receive appropriate breastfeeding support, the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding is increased.\u003csup\u003e19,20,21\u003c/sup\u003e The manner in which HCPs provide breastfeeding support and engage with mothers also matters.\u003csup\u003e22\u003c/sup\u003e Negative breastfeeding experiences in the first week increase the incidence of low breastfeeding self-efficacy\u003csup\u003e23\u003c/sup\u003e and receiving conflicting information can have a negative impact on mothers. \u003csup\u003e24\u003c/sup\u003e Recent studies have called for individualised and evidence-based breastfeeding support for specific issues including low milk supply and consistency in the advice given by HCPs\u003csup\u003e16,24,\u003c/sup\u003e. Furthermore, efforts to help mothers overcome lactational challenges and to understand lactation failure have been listed among the priorities for breastfeeding research\u003csup\u003e25\u003c/sup\u003e. Many mothers in Ireland are dissatisfied with the quality of breastfeeding support that they receive, pointing to a lack of individualised support, difficulties in accessing help and support that is inadequate for specific challenges \u003csup\u003e26,27\u003c/sup\u003e. Furthermore, significant gaps have been identified in the provision of breastfeeding education for HCPs in Ireland.\u003csup\u003e28,29,30,\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eVoluntary and peer breastfeeding support is widely regarded as playing an important role in helping mothers reach their breastfeeding goals and have their social needs met.\u003csup\u003e31,32\u003c/sup\u003e However, a potential weakness of these studies is that they are based on the experiences of women who choose to engage with voluntary and peer support services. It is possible that the needs of women who choose not to engage with these supports are missed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe present study of women\u0026rsquo;s experiences of breastfeeding with PLMS is an attempt to engage with women\u0026rsquo;s lived experiences of accessing breastfeeding support with the goal of adding to the existing body of work on breastfeeding difficulties. While four superordinate themes were identified in the broader study, just one of these themes, \u003cem\u003eBeing with Others\u003c/em\u003e, is addressed in this article. Being with Others is an analysis of the participants\u0026rsquo; experiences of interactions with HCPs, IBCLC (International Board Certified Lactation Consultants), support groups, and partners as they endeavoured to breastfeed.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Methods","content":"\u003cp\u003eInterpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA)\u003csup\u003e33\u003c/sup\u003e was used to explore the lived experiences of women in Ireland who are breastfeeding with PLMS. IPA is a seven-step qualitative research methodology concerned with revealing new insights about how individuals experience and make sense of phenomena\u003csup\u003e34\u003c/sup\u003e. Three key areas of philosophical knowledge namely, phenomenology, hermeneutics and idiography\u003csup\u003e33\u003c/sup\u003e inform the epistemological foundation of IPA. Phenomenology is concerned with revealing the meaning that participants derived from their lived experiences, hermeneutics guides the researcher\u0026rsquo;s interpretation of the data, and idiography relates to the detail and uniqueness of each participant\u0026rsquo;s experience\u003csup\u003e33\u003c/sup\u003e. IPA is considered useful for exploring topics that have emotional dimensions\u003csup\u003e35\u003c/sup\u003e and for under-researched phenomena or perspectives.\u003csup\u003e36\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Setting\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study took place in Ireland, where there are only 58 dedicated infant feeding positions in the public health maternity services, serving a population where 58,443 babies were born in 2021.\u003csup\u003e37\u003c/sup\u003e Eight of the nine participants in this study accessed the services of private IBCLCs, while just one was referred to an HSE community IBCLC.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 Participants and Recruitment\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePurposive sampling was used to recruit nine participants. The sample size in IPA studies of this type tends to be small to allow for a detailed and in-depth exploration of participants\u0026rsquo; lived experiences of the phenomenon being studied, rather than data that aims to be statistically significant.\u003csup\u003e36\u003c/sup\u003e What matters is the richness of data, the depth of analysis, and the homogeneity of the sample.\u003csup\u003e38\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecruitment was via social media. Mothers who met the inclusion criteria were invited to contact the main researcher (CW) by email. These criteria were as follows: (i) being over 18 years of age, (ii) having breastfed their baby for at least four months, (iii) had PLMS identified by an IBCLC or HCP, and (iv) having a baby of less than two years of age. The criterion of having breastfed for a minimum of four months was determined by the need to allow a reasonable timeframe to establish breastfeeding, and for PLMS to be identified. Within two weeks of initiating recruitment, 32 women made contact with the researcher (CW) and the first nine who met the inclusion criteria were selected. Initial telephone contact was made to initiate rapport and to schedule an interview. Prior to giving birth all participants had intended to breastfeed exclusively. The characteristics of the participants are presented in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipant Profile\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePseudonym\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAge\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAge of baby at time of interview\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBreastfeeding Duration\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eReported cause of PLMS\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e1\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCaroline\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e33\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePPH, PCOS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e2\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFiona\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e37\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIGT\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e3\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMegan\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e40\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIGT and PCOS\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e4\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAmy\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e31\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e13 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIGT, Familial Alactogenesis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e5\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSinead\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIGT\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e6\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e34\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14 mths +\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIGT\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e7\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOrla\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10 mths +\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHypothyroidism, possible IGT, Familial Alactogenesis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e8\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRuth\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e36\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e9 mths +\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIGT, Familial Alactogenesis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c2\" namest=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e9\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDonna\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18 mths\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIGT\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePPH, Postpartum Haemorrhage. PCOS, Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIGT, Insufficient Glandular Tissue\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Data Collection\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eInterviews were conducted between April and October 2021 via Zoom and lasted between 55 and 75 minutes. The interviews were loosely structured around an interview guide that covered topics such as the motivation to breastfeed, experiences with breastfeeding, the practical and emotional impacts of having PLMS, and supports accessed. Participants were eager to share their experiences and were very engaged in the topic. Interviews were audio recorded and stored in compliance with General Data Protection Regulation. Written informed consent was provided by participants prior to interview. Participants were assigned pseudonyms and identifying information was removed. It was anticipated that talking about their challenges with breastfeeding might trigger difficult emotions for participants. Ahead of the interviews, participants were advised that if they felt emotionally overwhelmed, the interview could be paused or terminated. While all participants became upset during interviews, they were happy to continue and complete the interview.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.4 Reflexivity\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eReflexivity is a process used in qualitative research to increase the credibility of findings.\u003csup\u003e39\u003c/sup\u003e It enables researchers to become self-aware and understand their influence on the research, and to consider how these might be minimised\u003csup\u003e40\u003c/sup\u003e. The first author (CW) was cognisant of her dual role both as a researcher and an IBCLC. She was aware of how being perceived by participants as an insider could influence the data, and was conscious of the fact that as a mother who breastfed her three children, she would bring a certain nuanced understanding of participants\u0026rsquo; experience to the process. Specific techniques that the first author employed to bring reflexivity to the research were (i) keeping a journal to allow for meaningful reflection, (ii) seeing a psychotherapist every six weeks to debrief, (iii) engaging with the principles of hermeneutic phenomenology prescribed by IPA, (iv) engaging regularly with supervisors to limit the subjectivity of interpretations and (v) writing interpretative summaries after each interview. Writing interpretative summaries provided awareness of subjective responses to the data and potential to influence the research.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.5 Data Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eData analysis was performed by following the steps prescribed by IPA: (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e) Becoming deeply engaged in the world of the participant by careful reading and re-reading of the transcripts. Transcribing the audio recordings also gave the main researcher (C.W.) an opportunity to become fully immersed in the participants\u0026rsquo; accounts of their experiences, and to pay close attention to the nuances of tone of voice and syntax. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e) Making initial observations, facilitated by a table with transcribed text copied to a column in the table, and then unpacking the text to expose its language, semantics and content in a second column. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e) Identifying themes from the initial observations and actively connecting the data to the researcher\u0026rsquo;s ideas, interpretations and reflections. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e) Searching for links across emerging themes. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e) Progressing to the next transcript and repeating steps 1\u0026ndash;4. Each time the researcher moved to the next interview, it was important to be mindful of a tendency to want to find themes that had already been identified in previous interviews. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e) Scrutinising and documenting trends, themes and sub-ordinate themes across all nine cases. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e) Advancing to a more refined and in-depth level of interpretation of the data. Interpretative summaries after each interview as this was found to provide a means of getting closer to the data and engaging in a phenomenological way with the emergence of themes and interpretations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eFour superordinate themes were identified in this study namely: \u003cem\u003eBeing in the Whirlwind, Being with Others, Reimagining Motherhood\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eEmbodiment\u003c/em\u003e. This article focuses on \u003cem\u003eBeing with Others\u003c/em\u003e. The title of this superordinate theme comes from Heidegger\u0026rsquo;s concept that individuals experience themselves in a world with and through other people, and that their self-understanding is interwoven with the self-understandings of others.\u003csup\u003e41\u003c/sup\u003e As participants experienced the phenomenon of PLMS, they had to engage with HCPs, IBCLCs, peer and voluntary supporters and partners. The interactions that participants had with these various \u003cem\u003eothers\u003c/em\u003e shaped how they viewed and experienced themselves, and how they derived meaning from being a mother with PLMS. The subthemes addressed here are \u003cem\u003eDisconnected Encounters, Perceiving Judgement from Others, Being in a Safe Space\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eHaving a Savior\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.1 Disconnected Encounters\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis subtheme considers how participants experienced a lack of meaningful connection in encounters with people providing professional and voluntary breastfeeding support, and how these encounters resulted in them feeling that they were not being heard.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile in hospital, most participants felt that the focus of midwives was their baby\u0026rsquo;s latch and that concerns they expressed about milk supply were dismissed. As a result, participants felt vulnerable and unseen, and had the impression that staff were not attuned to how important breastfeeding was to them:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI didn\u0026rsquo;t really have any support in the hospital\u0026hellip;the midwives would just take a quick glance and say \u0026ldquo;the latch is fine\u0026rdquo;\u0026hellip; [Caroline]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI tried to express colostrum\u0026hellip;.I didn\u0026rsquo;t know what I was doing, the midwife tried to show me but she was really busy\u0026hellip;.I brought what I had to the nurses, they were just\u0026hellip;\u0026ldquo;that\u0026rsquo;s nothing, that\u0026rsquo;s no good to him\u0026hellip; [Sinead]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecalling these encounters evoked sadness and anger for participants. Megan became quite distressed when she recalled an interaction she had with a paediatrician after it was discovered that her baby was not gaining weight:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;he said, I\u0026rsquo;ll never forget it \u0026ldquo;oh she must have been starving\u0026rdquo; and that just [voice breaks, crying], that hurt me so much\u0026hellip;I interpreted that as him saying I was trying to starve my baby [sobbing, deeply upset].\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome participants were also unhappy about \u003cem\u003ehow\u003c/em\u003e HCPs and IBCLCs communicated information about PLMS and IGT to them. Being told these conditions are rare or uncommon made them feel alone and marginalised:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI asked her if it was common and she said \u0026ldquo;maybe I have one every couple of years\u0026rdquo;\u0026hellip;It just made me feel more alone. I just think people who specialize in it, it would be helpful if they had more compassion and knew a bit more about it. [Sinead]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother aspect of breastfeeding support in hospital that some participants mentioned was unwelcome hands-on support from midwives. At a time when participants were vulnerable and anxious, this insensitive care increased their anxiety:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;she is one of those people who tries to get her hands in, it was such an invasion of my personal space, I felt violated by her, she was so uncaring. I didn\u0026rsquo;t ask for her to do that. She didn\u0026rsquo;t know what she was doing anyway [angry tone of voice]. [Megan]\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants described very unsatisfactory interactions with PHNs. Kate regarded her PHN\u0026rsquo;s attitude as not only unreasonable and unhelpful, but a threat to her sense of agency:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eThe PHN got so annoyed with me for going to an IBCLC\u0026hellip;she was being a huge pain, and I was like\u0026hellip;\u0026ldquo;look I am just doing what I can to get the support I need\u0026hellip;it\u0026rsquo;s my choice who I go to\u0026hellip; [annoyed and exasperated]. I was so frustrated, it was such a head-wreck\u0026hellip;all added stress. I was just trying to make breastfeeding work. [Kate]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRuth also had a deeply upsetting experience with her PHN which left her feeling objectified and humiliated. She described a meeting with the PHN her in her local health centre and became very upset as she recounted what was said to her:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI was just a new mom\u0026hellip;and you know you are not used to feeding in front of strangers\u0026hellip;and she looked at me and said \u0026ldquo;you have a very large gap between your breasts\u0026rdquo;, direct like that and kind of cold which automatically just made me feel like a freak\u0026hellip;..I said I was feeding her all the time, \u0026hellip;and she said \u0026ldquo;well that is because she is starving\u0026rdquo;... [Ruth]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere was clearly a lack of empathetic connection between Ruth and the PHN, and an apparent lack of awareness on the part of the PHN of Ruth\u0026rsquo;s vulnerability. Furthermore, Ruth interpreted the comment that her baby was \u0026ldquo;starving\u0026rdquo; as an implication she was negligent as a mother.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOne of the difficulties participants perceived in breastfeeding support groups was the attitude that there is no such thing as low milk supply. Amy describes her reaction to comments in a Facebook group and Orla recounts her experience of attending a La Leche League group:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;someone commented about low supply and most of the comments were \u0026ldquo;there\u0026rsquo;s no such thing, you just latch your baby and your supply will build up and don\u0026rsquo;t believe anyone saying you have low supply.\u0026rdquo; It made me angry. [Amy]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI was talking to La Leche League and the ladies were just telling me \u0026ldquo;just put him on the boob, don\u0026rsquo;t worry, the milk will come in, don\u0026rsquo;t give him formula at all\u0026hellip;\u0026rdquo; [Orla]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLike other participants, Amy and Orla appeared to be very attuned to others\u0026rsquo; opinions about low milk supply and angry that their concerns were dismissed. They internalised the message to keep breastfeeding as dismissive and undermining.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.2 Perceiving Judgement from Others\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn social settings, many participants feared judgement from others. They felt different, they were embarrassed about giving infant formula and they felt a need to explain to people why they were not exclusively breastfeeding. This could be interpreted as \u003cem\u003einternalised stigma -\u003c/em\u003e an awareness of others\u0026rsquo; perception of an \u0026ldquo;undesirable difference\u0026rdquo; in them that makes them feel that they are falling short of what they ought to be. Many participants described feeling self-conscious and even ashamed about giving their babies infant formula in social settings and expressed that they felt a need to explain to people why they were not exclusively breastfeeding. They gave the impression that formula-feeding in public undermined their sense of who they were as a mother:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI feel a little bit ashamed with people seeing me formula feed her\u0026hellip;And sometimes I over-share, I might say \u0026ldquo;oh she is combination fed\u0026rdquo;, I feel like have to say it\u0026hellip;I don\u0026rsquo;t know, that\u0026rsquo;s just my own problem. [Ruth]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI always want to tell people about the IGT\u0026hellip;then it\u0026rsquo;s \u0026ldquo;that\u0026rsquo;s why I\u0026rsquo;m not breastfeeding\u0026rdquo;\u0026hellip;it\u0026rsquo;s just, I\u0026rsquo;m still a breastfeeding mum even though I\u0026rsquo;m not breastfeeding, or whatever that is. [Caroline]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCaroline strongly identifies breastfeeding as inseparable from her identity as a mother and craves acknowledgement that she had a difficult time breastfeeding:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI need to opportunity to talk about it or you kind of want it acknowledged\u0026hellip; [Caroline is crying].\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMegan used an at-breast supplementer and explained how she felt using this in front of other mothers. She portrays herself as vulnerable and self-conscious, unable to understand why her body cannot make enough milk for her baby yet feeling obliged to explain to others why she was feeding this way:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;they weren\u0026rsquo;t rude about it but they were like \u0026ldquo;what is that?\u0026rdquo; [tone and facial expression of disgust]\u0026hellip;\u0026ldquo;and you\u0026rsquo;re breastfeeding her, and there\u0026rsquo;s formula and a tube?\u0026rdquo;, they were trying to be nice about it but it wasn\u0026rsquo;t something they had ever been exposed to. Having to explain it when I didn\u0026rsquo;t even know why I had to do it\u0026hellip;\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRather than give their babies infant formula in front of other people, some participants chose not to as they did not want people to know they had low milk supply. Donna described attending a breastfeeding support group and leaving when she knew her baby needed extra milk, rather than giving him formula in front of the other mothers:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI couldn\u0026rsquo;t fully participate in some of the things because I was supplementing\u0026hellip;it was totally my perception. It was shame, probably a little strong. But this is the dirty laundry piece. Not wanting people to know or to see that I couldn\u0026rsquo;t fully feed him. There was always a coffee after the breastfeeding group, and I remember looking at my baby thinking he\u0026rsquo;s hungry and\u0026hellip;I just wasn\u0026rsquo;t willing to feed him the bottle in front of other people, having emptied both breasts. It sounds totally idiotic when I look back, but all I should have said was I have low supply but in a group of people who had all successfully achieved supply for their children I couldn\u0026rsquo;t do that.\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDonna felt that she was falling short of a level of achievement which she believed all the other mothers at the group had attained. She feared judgement for not exclusively breastfeeding and compared having PLMS to having \u0026ldquo;dirty laundry\u0026rdquo; \u0026ndash; something to be hidden or ashamed of. The consequence of this internalised feeling of stigma for Donna was isolation from the other mothers.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome participants recalled experiences of being in a large breastfeeding support group on Facebook. The perceived negative attitudes towards the use of infant formula and scepticism about low milk supply made them feel stigmatised and angry. Both Amy and Sinead subsequently left this group:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI think there\u0026rsquo;s a lot of hatred for combination feeding in that group because it is seen like \u0026ldquo;oh you just want a break from breastfeeding\u0026rdquo; or \u0026ldquo;you just don\u0026rsquo;t want to do night feeds\u0026rdquo; or \u0026ldquo;you\u0026rsquo;re just not committed to it.\u0026rdquo;\u0026hellip;it made me angry \u0026hellip;. [Amy]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;I feel that there is a sense of being really skeptical of people who say they have low supply and they don\u0026rsquo;t know what it is to triple feed\u0026hellip;and always be obsessing about your supply\u0026hellip;, and how much formula did you give. [Sinead]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eKate described not being able to breastfeed exclusively as being like denied admission to an \u0026ldquo;exclusive\u0026rdquo; club. This analogy is representative of how participants experienced having PLMS. Kate highlighted a common perception that mothers either breastfeed or formula feed, and asserts that she did not fall into either of these categories, rather, she was \u0026ldquo;in-between:\u0026rdquo;\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI hate the word \u0026lsquo;exclusive\u0026rsquo; it\u0026rsquo;s like it\u0026rsquo;s this exclusive club that I\u0026rsquo;m not in, you know what I mean? I\u0026rsquo;m like yeah it makes it seem like it is all or nothing. And it can be all or nothing, but there is lots in-between.\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.3 Being in a Safe Space\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis section discusses experiences of peer-support from other mothers with PLMS. Four of the participants were members of a WhatsApp support group for mothers experiencing breastfeeding difficulties called \u003cem\u003eThe Purple Hearts\u003c/em\u003e group. Most of the women in this group had PLMS. Two of the participants joined a low milk supply support group on Facebook. They reported similar experiences of being in these groups. The one benefit they stressed above all others was that of being understood, and therefore validated:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;.you\u0026rsquo;re in this weird middle space where you\u0026rsquo;re not exclusively breastfeeding, they\u0026rsquo;re women who have had to do it\u0026hellip; they get what it\u0026rsquo;s like. [Megan]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;.they accepted me into the Low Milk Supply group, and ...I was so overwhelmed because I was like \u0026ldquo;this is actually a thing!\u0026rdquo; [excited tone]\u0026hellip;other people have this\u0026hellip;I started reading other people\u0026rsquo;s posts\u0026hellip;that was a real changing point for me in my journey. Just like life-changing\u0026hellip;. My journey would have been much worse if it hadn\u0026rsquo;t been for that Facebook group. [Sinead]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;it felt really good to be connected with other women who know this is important to me as a mum. [Fiona]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBeing in these groups helped the participants come to terms with having PLMS. The understanding and empathy they described contrasts with the lack of understanding they reported in their interactions with HCPs. Megan became emotional as she elaborated about what it was like to feel that she was in a \u0026ldquo;safe space\u0026rdquo; among people who had had similar experiences:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;people who get that grief, who understand the challenges and practicalities of that\u0026hellip;there are people who have been through similar things, who\u0026rsquo;ll say \u0026ldquo;I\u0026rsquo;ve tried this, or people who are a bit further down the road who can say \u0026rdquo;yeah I went through that it was so hard\u0026rdquo;. For new mums to the group everyone really rallies round and says \u0026ldquo;you\u0026rsquo;re doing so well keep going\u0026rdquo;\u0026hellip;it\u0026rsquo;s just really compassionate people...[starts crying]\u0026hellip;it\u0026rsquo;s just a really safe space. [Megan]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother aspect of being supported by other women with PLMS was reassurance that they were not on their own:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;hearing different women\u0026rsquo;s problems and hearing the hardship that they had to go through\u0026hellip;gave me a sense of belonging and then knowing that you\u0026rsquo;re not the only one\u0026hellip;you feel listened to. [Orla]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHearing other women\u0026rsquo;s stories appeared to give participants greater insight into their own experience of having PLMS and a realisation of how much effort they had invested in breastfeeding. Being in the groups served to hold up a mirror to them and helped them develop a greater sense of self and a stronger motherhood self-identity \u0026ndash; an identity which had previously been shattered by having PLMS:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;when you talk to all of those women\u0026hellip;you realise we do five hundred percent more than the women whose baby latches ok. [Orla]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;.when I see new people join, I see a lot of myself in them when they are talking, and I\u0026rsquo;m thinking \u0026ldquo;I can remember feeling exactly how you feel.\u0026rdquo;\u0026hellip; [Amy]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;being able to give advice to other mums kind of made me realise how far we have come. I remember one of the women\u0026hellip;her baby was maybe five weeks and she just looked so sad, it was like looking in a mirror\u0026hellip; and I could just relate so much, she looked exhausted and so sad and frustrated and\u0026hellip;it made me realise we have come a long way.\u0026rdquo;. [Fiona]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eKate, Ruth and Donna spoke about being supported by other mothers with PLMS. Their reflections echoed the comments of the participants who were in online groups, in that they gained insight and self-acceptance through seeing their experiences mirrored in the experiences of others. These encounters seemed to represent a significant shift in how they understood and perceived themselves:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eYou know what I found really supportive? I have a neighbour with IGT\u0026hellip; and she found it very detrimental to her mental health\u0026hellip; she was just someone that actually knew what I was going through, yeah invaluable\u0026hellip;. [Ruth]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;she was kind of like me, she really wanted to make breastfeeding work and she did the best she could\u0026hellip;she was like \u0026ldquo;look, you have to know that just because you have low supply it doesn\u0026rsquo;t make you any less of a mom\u0026rdquo;. She was really supportive. She had gone through something similar. [Kate]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI kind of feel an affiliation with her because she had the low supply as well. [Donna]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.4 Having a Saviour\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants identified two main sources of invaluable help and support as they struggled with the challenges of breastfeeding with PLMS, their IBCLCs and their partners. They credited IBCLCs with providing skilled and empathetic support that helped them continue breastfeeding and come to terms with having PLMS. Participants also described how their partners gave them practical help and emotional support.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCaroline described her HSE community IBCLC as an \u0026ldquo;absolute lifesaver\u0026rdquo;, and Kate credited her private practice IBCLC with being the \u0026ldquo;saviour\u0026rdquo; of her breastfeeding relationship:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;.she was fantastic and was my main support for the remainder of my breastfeeding journey\u0026hellip;she an absolute lifesaver, I wouldn\u0026rsquo;t have breastfed for as long without her\u0026hellip; [Caroline]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eMy lactation consultant was the savior of our breastfeeding relationship. [Kate]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipants stressed the importance of the empathy and emotional support that they received from their IBCLCs, giving the impression that it was as important as the practical support to continue breastfeeding:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIt would have been a very different journey if I hadn\u0026rsquo;t had someone who understood completely and was empathetic. She didn\u0026rsquo;t just support me with breastfeeding, she supported me emotionally at times as well. And that was so important. No one else had any knowledge about it, apart from my lactation consultant. [Amy]\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother aspect of the support IBCLCs provided to participants was helping them to understand the embodied nature of breastfeeding, that it is more than a means of providing milk, and that having PLMS can be experienced as a loss:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eShe put into words, what I didn\u0026rsquo;t realise I felt, you know like not being able to breastfeed fully\u0026hellip;can be viewed as a loss. And that breastfeeding is about so much more than feeding your baby, and that it\u0026rsquo;s a connection, it\u0026rsquo;s bonding. But I didn\u0026rsquo;t know that. [Ruth]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e The participants stressed how much they valued being listened to by their IBCLCs. This and being emotionally supported are in stark contrast to participants\u0026rsquo; earlier experiences in maternity settings of feeling unseen and unsupported:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;.that felt like the first time someone was really listening to what we were saying\u0026hellip; I felt supported. [Megan]\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e The participants\u0026rsquo; partners also played an important role in providing support. At a practical level, they helped with preparing bottles and minding the baby while participants rested or pumped:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eI have the most supportive husband on the planet. He was flat out running and getting me bottles and like sterilizing things, and washing bottles\u0026hellip; [Kate]\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;.he would put her in the sling and work away in his office and she\u0026rsquo;d be asleep on him, and that was my chance to have a rest or whatever. That was absolutely fundamental, it is not possible to do this without somebody. [Caroline]\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe participants credited their partners with giving them encouragement when they were finding breastfeeding difficult and with being a source of ongoing emotional support. When Ruth spoke about her partnerd, she described him as a steadying and calm presence, who encouraged her to just do what she could without pressuring or discouraging her. She said he helped her to rationalise things and to see her situation more objectively, while also understanding that breastfeeding mattered to her:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003e\u0026hellip;.he admired the effort that went into it and never pushed me to keep going, he wasn\u0026rsquo;t pro-formula, like just formula feed and not think what that would mean for me. He would say \u0026ldquo;just give her what you can\u0026rdquo; and would help me to rationalise things and just to realise that he was there for me. [Ruth]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe participants also reflected on the role their partners played in helping them to appreciate how much effort they had put into breastfeeding, giving them a clearer perspective on their experience of having PLMS:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eHe knew how much it meant to me, and he tried to reassure me that I was doing a good job no matter how much I got or if I took a break, but like, \u0026ldquo;look at everything you are giving to him, look at how well he\u0026rsquo;s doing. [Amy]\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eKate became emotional when she talked about how her partner supported her and how he had so much faith in her. She gave the impression that he was a calm and wise presence throughout her breastfeeding journey, who had an unconditional belief in Kate\u0026rsquo;s ability to care for her baby, despite Kate\u0026rsquo;s own misgivings:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eI\u0026rsquo;m going to cry now thinking about how well my husband supported me, not that I could ever love him more. It has made us so much stronger. He was never like \u0026lsquo;oh maybe you should switch to formula\u0026rsquo;, he was always supportive of what I wanted to do and like, he knew that somewhere deep inside I knew what she needed. [Kate]\u003c/em\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study provides valuable insights into how mothers with PLMS experienced breastfeeding support from HCPs, IBCLCs, and peer and voluntary supports. It also reveals how crucial that practical and emotional support from partners was to participants. Four subordinate themes were developed: \u003cem\u003eDisconnected Encounters, Perceiving Judgement from Others, Being in a Safe Space\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eHaving a Saviour\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe encounters of participants with HCPs in the early postpartum period were largely unhelpful. These negative encounters were rooted in a perceived lack of rapport or connection between the HCP and the breastfeeding mother, unwanted and intrusive physical support, an apparent insensitivity to how important breastfeeding was to the mothers and that HCPs lacked knowledge about PLMS. These findings corroborate previous studies that explored experiences of breastfeeding support\u003csup\u003e27,42,43\u003c/sup\u003e and echo a recent study which found that women with PLMS were dissatisfied with support received from HCPs.\u003csup\u003e16\u003c/sup\u003e An impediment to rapport evident in the participants’ accounts of their interactions with HCPs was their heightened sensitivity to language and the way in which information was conveyed. Participants internalised remarks from HCPs as dehumanising, as a threat to their sense of agency and as calling into question their ability to care for their babies. These findings align with those of Spannhake et al.\u003csup\u003e44\u003c/sup\u003e who called for sensitivity and understanding on the part of HCPs when interacting with mothers with breastfeeding problems and are consistent with research that mothers experience hands-on breastfeeding support as intrusive.\u003csup\u003e45,46,47\u003c/sup\u003e Our study also echoes evidence that greater consideration should be given to the relationship between breastfeeding experiences and maternal identity.\u003csup\u003e48,49,50\u003c/sup\u003e In terms of voluntary and peer breastfeeding support, the women in this study were dissatisfied with their experiences of face-to-face and online groups. They perceived a scepticism around the existence of PLMS and felt that their concerns were dismissed. They also perceived that they were being judged for using infant formula and that this led to an internalised feeling of stigma. While many studies support the importance of voluntary and peer support for breastfeeding mothers\u003csup\u003e19,20,32,51\u003c/sup\u003e, there has been very little exploration of the notion that they might not necessarily be a \u003cem\u003eone-size-fits-all\u003c/em\u003e solution for mothers with specific breastfeeding difficulties such as PLMS.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn contrast to the participants’ encounters with HCPs, their experiences with IBCLCs were overwhelmingly positive. They valued the knowledge of IBCLCs and credited them with enabling them to continue breastfeeding, with some referring to their IBCLCs as “the saviour of our breastfeeding relationship” and “an absolute lifesaver”. Participants valued the sensitive and empathetic manner with which IBCLCs delivered support, and the way they helped them appreciate the more nuanced aspects of being a breastfeeding mother. Many participants expressed how their IBCLCs facilitated acceptance of PLMS. These results are consistent with studies that identified the importance of individualised support, sensitivity from HCPs and respectful, mutual dialogue\u003csup\u003e52,53\u003c/sup\u003e and evidence that IBCLC support in the postpartum period has the potential to improve breastfeeding outcomes\u003csup\u003e54,55\u003c/sup\u003e. Our findings reflect the need to move away from viewing breastfeeding support through a purely biomedical lens and to place greater emphasis on person-centered emotional and psychological support for breastfeeding mothers\u003csup\u003e43,56\u003c/sup\u003e. Little has been reported about the role of IBCLCs in providing this kind of emotional and psychological support. Indeed, in a position paper on the role and impact of IBCLCs,\u003csup\u003e57\u003c/sup\u003e neither emotional nor psychological support were included among the nine roles that were suggested for IBCLCs. A more recent paper has highlighted the need for more research on the impact of the IBCLC in inpatient and hospital settings.\u003csup\u003e55\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e The participants valued and were grateful for the encouragement and support that they received from their partners. They experienced this support as non-judgemental, unconditional, and fundamental to being able to continue breastfeeding with PLMS. Despite the challenges that PLMS presented for the participants and their partners, there was no evidence of tension or discord. Rather, they gave the impression that they adapted well as a couple to the challenges of breastfeeding with PLMS and one participant even expressed that the experience made their relationship stronger. Our finding that women credited the support of their partners with them being able to continue breastfeeding is consistent with previous studies which have identified the importance of partner support to feelings of breastfeeding self-efficacy and to an duration of breastfeeding.\u003csup\u003e58\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOne unexpected finding of the current study was the degree of internalised stigma that resulted from the participants’ encounters at peer and voluntary support groups. Internalised stigma is an “undesirable difference” in the eyes of others that undermines a person’s identity, or the feeling of falling short of what one ought to be.\u003csup\u003e59\u003c/sup\u003e The phenomenon represents what many of the participants experienced in the company of other breastfeeding mothers. They described how they did not want other breastfeeding mothers to see them give formula to their babies, feeling shame when they did so, and not understanding why they felt this way. A probable is that formula-feeding did not align with participants’ internalised self-identity as a breastfeeding mother. This hypothesis is supported by feminist literature which contends that breastfeeding can be conceived of as a public display of one’s chosen way to mother, of showing the world who you are.\u003csup\u003e60\u003c/sup\u003e Not being able to conform and breastfeed exclusively in front of other mothers resulted in some participants leaving social gatherings early to avoid being seen bottle-feeding, being embarrassed using a supplemental nursing system, and feeling a need to explain to people why they were giving formula. These encounters made mothers feel ashamed and isolated and echo previous research which used the term “failing before the other” to describe women’s experiences of unsuccessful attempts to breastfeed in the presence of other people.\u003csup\u003e61\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother surprising finding of the current research was the degree to which the participants valued and benefitted from the support of others with PLMS. Seven of the nine participants received help and/or support from others with PLMS via social media groups or their own social contacts. They variously described this support as like “being in a safe space” and “feeling less alone”. The women valued the sense they had of feeling understood and of being among others who “get what it’s like”. Being among other women with PLMS appeared to give the participants a greater degree of self-understanding. One participant described hearing other women talk about their experiences as like “looking in a mirror” and another described how seeing newer members join the group helped her realise how far she had come. Another participant even described her first contact with a low milk supply support group as a “turning point” in her journey. Peer and voluntary breastfeeding supports are widely accepted as being important for most mothers.\u003csup\u003e32,51\u003c/sup\u003e However, these studies tend to consider peer and voluntary support as generic and do not consider the possible value of problem-specific breastfeeding support. One study which explored women’s embodied experiences during breastfeeding, reported that mothers experienced profound relief when they came across other mothers who had had similar experiences to them.\u003csup\u003e50\u003c/sup\u003e The mothers in the study said that being with other mothers who had had similar experiences alleviated their sense of defectiveness and gave them a sense of having a “safe space” in which they were able to talk about their experiences. Similarly, Spannhake \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e.\u003csup\u003e44\u003c/sup\u003e found that some of the emotional burden of breastfeeding difficulties was relieved by having contact with and sharing experiences with other women having similar problems. Our finding that participants benefitted from the support of others with PLMS is consistent with these studies. It also supports the theory that when people are faced with challenging life events, they seek belonging with “like-minded allies” and that doing so enables them to create meaning and a capacity for transcendence.\u003csup\u003e62\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe conclude that there is a need for greater knowledge among midwives and other HCPs of PLMS as a condition and the importance of referring these mothers to an IBCLC. Our findings also suggest that HCPs who provide breastfeeding support in maternity and community settings receive enhanced communication training to help them deliver support in a sensitive and empathic manner. They would also benefit from further education on the more nuanced aspects of breastfeeding, such as how it can impact on motherhood self-identity and emotional well-being. In regard to voluntary and peer support for mothers with PLMS, we suggest that where possible, they be directed to groups for women experiencing breastfeeding difficulties and/or PLMS.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOur findings reveal a need for a greater emphasis on sensitive, individualised, person-centred care that is cognisant of the deeply personal way in which some women perceive breastfeeding, and their heightened sensitivity in relation to HCPs’ actions and words. There is a need for greater knowledge and understanding among HCPs of the phenomenon of PLMS so that women suspected of having the condition may be offered a referral to a lactation specialist. Furthermore, greater consideration should be given by HCPs providing breastfeeding support to women with PLMS to the important role of their partners in continued breastfeeding and in providing emotional support.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":" \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eEthics\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Human Research and Ethics Committee at the university at which the researchers are based granted ethical approval for the study. All participants were given written information about the study and the opportunity to ask questions before consenting to participate.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eConsent for Publication\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003ch2\u003eCompeting Interests\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eNone of the authors have competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAuthors\u0026rsquo; Information\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eCorresponding author: Caoimhe Whelan [email protected]\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe first author (C.W.) is an International Board-Certified Lactation Consultant working in private practice. She was acutely aware of the emotional and practical challenges faced by mothers with Primary Low Milk Supply and so she conceived of the idea to undertake research on their experiences of breastfeeding with this phenomenon. This led her to undertaking an MSc. by research at University College Dublin. C.W.\u0026rsquo;s goal was to publish findings that would be used to shape policy and guidelines related to the provision of support for mothers with Primary Low Milk Supply.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFunding\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe first author self-funded her MSc. by research.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eC.W. conducted the research and wrote the main manuscript. D.O.B and A.H. provided supervision and reviewed the main manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of the nine women who participated in this study.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAvailability of Data and Materials\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWorld Health Organisation. 2023. Exclusive breastfeeding for optimal growth, development and health of infants. Accessed on 23 Mar 2024: (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.who.int/tools/elena/interventions/exclusive-breastfeeding)\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.who.int/tools/elena/interventions/exclusive-breastfeeding)\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFarah E, Barger MK, Klima C, Rossman B, Hershberger P. Impaired lactation: review of delayed lactogenesis and insufficient lactation. J Midwifery Women's Health. 2021;66(5):631\u0026ndash;40. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13274\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/jmwh.13274\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGalipeau R, Dumas L, Lepage M. Perception of not having enough milk and actual milk production of first-time breastfeeding mothers: is there a difference? Breastfeed Med. 2017;12(4):210\u0026ndash;7. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2016.0183\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1089/bfm.2016.0183\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKam RL, Amir LH, Cullinane M. Is there an association between breast hypoplasia and breastfeeding outcomes? A systematic review. Breastfeed Med. 2021;16(8):594\u0026ndash;602. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2021.0032\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1089/bfm.2021.0032\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHuggins K, Petok E, Mireles O. Markers of lactation insufficiency: a study of 34 mothers. Curr issues Clin lactation. 2000;1:25\u0026ndash;35.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNeifert MR, Seacat JM, Jobe WE. Lactation failure due to insufficient glandular development of the breast. Pediatrics. 1985;76(5):823\u0026ndash;8.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNommsen-Rivers LA, Wagner EA, Roznowski DM, Riddle SW, Ward LP, Thompson A. Measures of maternal metabolic health as predictors of severely low milk production. Breastfeed Med. 2022;17(7):566\u0026ndash;76. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2021.0292\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1089/bfm.2021.0292\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGlover AV, Berry DC, Schwartz TA, Stuebe AM. The association of metabolic dysfunction with breastfeeding outcomes in gestational diabetes. Am J Perinatol. 2018;35(14):1339\u0026ndash;45. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1055/s-0038-1626713\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1055/s-0038-1626713\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKent JC, Ashton E, Hardwick CM, Rea A, Murray K, Geddes DT. Causes of perception of insufficient milk supply in Western Australian mothers. Maternal \u0026amp; child nutrition. 2021;17(1):e13080, Deurzen-Smith V. Everyday mysteries: Existential dimensions of psychotherapy. (No Title). 1997.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHale TFH, Peter E. Hale and Hartmann's Textbook of Human Lactation. First ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2017.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWorld Health Organization. (2009) \u0026lsquo;Acceptable medical reasons for use of breast-milk substitutes\u0026rsquo;. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/69938/WHO_FCH_CAH_09.01_eng.pdf?sequence=1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/69938/WHO_FCH_CAH_09.01_eng.pdf?sequence=1\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e [Accessed 23 May 2024].\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrown A, Rance J, Bennett P. Understanding the relationship between breastfeeding and postnatal depression: the role of pain and physical difficulties. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(2):273\u0026ndash;82. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12832\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/jan.12832\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGregory EF, Butz AM, Ghazarian SR, Gross SM, Johnson SB. Are unmet breastfeeding expectations associated with maternal depressive symptoms? Acad Pediatr. 2015;15(3):319\u0026ndash;25. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2014.12.003\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.acap.2014.12.003\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWilliamson I, Leeming D, Lyttle S, Johnson S. It should be the most natural thing in the world\u0026rsquo;: Exploring first-time mothers' breastfeeding difficulties in the UK using audio‐diaries and interviews. Matern Child Nutr. 2012;8(4):434\u0026ndash;47. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00328.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00328.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHarrison LN, Chin A, Neiterman E. Failure to Feed: Women\u0026rsquo;s Experiences of Breastfeeding and the Implications for Health Promotion Practice. Women's Reproductive Health. 2021;8(3):173\u0026ndash;87. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2021.1973844\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/23293691.2021.1973844\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKam RL, Bennetts SK, Cullinane M, Amir LH. I didn\u0026rsquo;t want to let go of the dream: Exploring women\u0026rsquo;s personal stories of how their low milk supply was discovered. Sex Reproductive Healthc. 2024;40:100953. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2024.100953\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.srhc.2024.100953\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWhelan C, O'Brien D, Hyde A. Mother's Emotional Experiences of Breastfeeding with Primary Low Milk Supply in the First Four Months Postpartum: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Breastfeed Med. 2024;19(3):197\u0026ndash;207. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2023.0231\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1089/bfm.2023.0231\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFarah E, Klima C, Rossman B, McFarlin B, Hershberger P. It's Not All or Nothing: Understanding How Women with Lactation Failure Experience Breastfeeding. Journal of Midwifery \u0026amp; Women\u0026rsquo;s 2019 Sep 1 (Vol. 64, No. 5, pp. 674\u0026ndash;674).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMcFadden A, Gavine A, Renfrew MJ, Wade A, Buchanan P, Taylor JL, Veitch E, Rennie AM, Crowther SA, Neiman S, MacGillivray S. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane database Syst reviews. 2017;2\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTrickey H, Thomson G, Grant A, Sanders J, Mann M, Murphy S, Paranjothy S. A realist review of one-to‐one breastfeeding peer support experiments conducted in developed country settings. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(1):e12559. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12559\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/mcn.12559\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTheodorah DZ, Mc\u0026rsquo;Deline RN. The kind of support that matters to exclusive breastfeeding a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:1\u0026ndash;8. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03590-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12884-021-03590-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNilsson IM, Kronborg H, Rahbek K, Strandberg-Larsen K. The significance of early breastfeeding experiences on breastfeeding self‐efficacy one week postpartum. Matern Child Nutr. 2020;16(3):e12986. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12986\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/mcn.12986\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFraser M, Dowling S, Oxford L, Ellis N, Jones M. Important times for breastfeeding support: a qualitative study of mothers\u0026rsquo; experiences. Int J Health Promotion Educ. 2020;58(2):71\u0026ndash;82. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2019.1676811\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/14635240.2019.1676811\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBlixt I, Johansson M, Hildingsson I, Papoutsi Z, Rubertsson C. Women\u0026rsquo;s advice to healthcare professionals regarding breastfeeding:offer sensitive individualized breastfeeding support-an interview study. Int Breastfeed J. 2019;14:1\u0026ndash;2. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-019-0247-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s13006-019-0247-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAzad MB, Nickel NC, Bode L, Brockway M, Brown A, Chambers C, et al. Breastfeeding and the origins of health: Interdisciplinary perspectives and priorities. Matern Child Nutr. 2021;17(2):e13109. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13109\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/mcn.13109\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLawlor N, Prihodova L, Byrne D, Etherton M, Rahill F, Wilson C. at al. A qualitative analysis of women\u0026rsquo;s postnatal experiences of breastfeeding supports during the perinatal period in Ireland. Plos one. 2023;18(7):e0288230, \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288230\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pone.0288230\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMurphy R, Foley C, Verling AM, O'Carroll T, Flynn R, Rohde D. Women's experiences of initiating feeding shortly after birth in Ireland: A secondary analysis of quantitative and qualitative data from the National Maternity Experience Survey. Midwifery. 2022;107:103263. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103263\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.midw.2022.103263\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMcGuinness D, Ni Mhurchu S, Frazer K, Bhardwaj N, Cornally P, Cantwell M, et al. A co-designed evaluation study to identify Breastfeeding Knowledge of General Practitioners\u0026rsquo; and Practice Nurses\u0026rsquo;. Health Promot Int. 2024;39(2):daae021. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae021\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1093/heapro/daae021\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWalsh A, McCluskey R, Cassidy D, McGoldrick G, Howlin C, Muldoon K, et al. The Support Needs and Current Practices of Public Health Nurses in the Republic of Ireland Who Provide Support to Breastfeeding Mothers: A Cross-Sectional Survey. J Hum Lactation. 2023;39(4):733\u0026ndash;42. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231172991\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/08903344231172991\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDunne S, Fallon A. Public health nurses' experiences of supporting women to breastfeed in community settings in Ireland. J Health Visiting. 2020;8(6):240\u0026ndash;6. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.12968/johv.2020.8.6.240\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.12968/johv.2020.8.6.240\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQuinn EM, Gallagher L, de Vries J. A qualitative exploration of breastfeeding support groups in Ireland from the women's perspectives. Midwifery. 2019;78:71\u0026ndash;7. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.08.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.midw.2019.08.001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChang YS, Beake S, Kam J, Lok KY, Bick D. Views and experiences of women, peer supporters and healthcare professionals on breastfeeding peer support: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Midwifery. 2022;108:103299. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103299\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.midw.2022.103299\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLarkin M, Flowers P, Smith JA. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLarkin M, Flowers P, Smith JA. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Sage Publications: United Kingdom; 2021. pp. 1\u0026ndash;11.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePope C, Mays N. Qualitative Research in Health Care. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2020.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePeat G, Rodriguez A, Smith J. Interpretive phenomenological analysis applied to healthcare research. Evid Based Nurs. 2019;22(1):7\u0026ndash;9. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2018-103017\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1136/ebnurs-2018-103017\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCentral Statistics Office. 2023. Vital Statistics Yearly Summary. Accessed on 23 May 2024: (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-vsys/vitalstatisticsyearlysummary2021/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-vsys/vitalstatisticsyearlysummary2021/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114523. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDodgson JE. Reflexivity in qualitative research. J Hum lactation. 2019;35(2):220\u0026ndash;2. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419830990\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/0890334419830990\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eClancy M. Is reflexivity the key to minimising problems of interpretation in phenomenological research? Nurse Res. 2013;20(6).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHeidegger M. Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell; 1967.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHennessy M, Byrne M, Laws R, Heary C. They just need to come down a little bit to your level: a qualitative study of parents\u0026rsquo; views and experiences of early life interventions to promote healthy growth and associated behaviours. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10):3605. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103605\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/ijerph17103605\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTaylor AM, van Teijlingen E, Ryan KM, Alexander J. Scrutinised, judged and sabotaged\u0026rsquo;: A qualitative video diary study of first-time breastfeeding mothers. Midwifery. 2019;75:16\u0026ndash;23. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.04.004\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.midw.2019.04.004\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpannhake M, Jansen C, G\u0026ouml;rig T, Diehl K. It Is a Very Emotional Topic for Me\u0026mdash;Managing Breastfeeding Problems among German Mothers: A Qualitative Approach. InHealthcare 2021 Oct 11 (Vol. 9, No. 10, p. 1352). MDPI. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9101352\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/healthcare9101352\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpencer R, Greatrex-White S, Fraser DM. I was meant to be able to do this\u0026rsquo;: A phenomenological study of women\u0026rsquo;s experiences of breastfeeding. Evid Based Midwifery. 2014;12(3):83\u0026ndash;8.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePalm\u0026eacute;r L, Carlsson G, Mollberg M, Nystr\u0026ouml;m M. Severe breastfeeding difficulties: Existential lostness as a mother\u0026mdash;Women's lived experiences of initiating breastfeeding under severe difficulties. Int J qualitative Stud health well-being. 2012;7(1):10846. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v7i0.10846\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3402/qhw.v7i0.10846\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBurns E, Fenwick J, Sheehan A, Schmied V. Mining for liquid gold: midwifery language and practices associated with early breastfeeding support. Matern Child Nutr. 2013;9(1):57\u0026ndash;73. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00397.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00397.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEdwards R, Cragg B, Dunn S, Peterson WE. The breastfeeding and early motherhood experiences of older first-time mothers: A constructivist grounded theory study. Midwifery. 2021;96:102945. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.102945\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.midw.2021.102945\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKuswara K, Knight T, Campbell KJ, Hesketh KD, Zheng M, Bolton KA, Laws R. Breastfeeding and emerging motherhood identity: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of first time Chinese Australian mothers\u0026rsquo; breastfeeding experiences. Women Birth. 2021;34(3):e292\u0026ndash;301. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.03.005\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.wombi.2020.03.005\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWatkinson M, Murray C, Simpson J. Maternal experiences of embodied emotional sensations during breast feeding: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Midwifery. 2016;36:53\u0026ndash;60. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.019\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.midw.2016.02.019\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eIngram J, Thomson G, Johnson D, Clarke JL, Trickey H, Hoddinott P, et al. Women's and peer supporters' experiences of an assets-based peer support intervention for increasing breastfeeding initiation and continuation: A qualitative study. Health Expect. 2020;23(3):622\u0026ndash;31. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13042\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/hex.13042\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLeeming D, Marshall J, Locke A. Understanding process and context in breastfeeding support interventions: The potential of qualitative research. Matern Child Nutr. 2017;13(4):e12407. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12407\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/mcn.12407\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTrickey H, Newburn M. Goals, dilemmas and assumptions in infant feeding education and support. Applying theory of constraints thinking tools to develop new priorities for action. Matern Child Nutr. 2014;10(1):72\u0026ndash;91. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00417.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00417.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChetwynd EM, Wasser HM, Poole C. Breastfeeding support interventions by International Board Certified Lactation Consultants: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Hum Lactation. 2019;35(3):424\u0026ndash;40. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419851482\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/0890334419851482\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHaase B, Brennan E, Wagner CL. Effectiveness of the IBCLC: Have we made an impact on the care of breastfeeding families over the past decade? J Hum Lactation. 2019;35(3):441\u0026ndash;52. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419851805\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/0890334419851805\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGiann\u0026igrave; ML, Lanzani M, Consales A, Bestetti G, Colombo L, Bettinelli ME, et al. Exploring the emotional breastfeeding experience of first-time mothers: implications for healthcare support. Front Pead. 2020;8:199. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00199\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fped.2020.00199\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eInternational Lactation Consultant Association. (2011). Position paper on the role and impact of the IBCLC. Accessed on 23 May 2024 (\u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://portal.ilca.org/files/resources/ilca_publications/Role%20%20Impact%20of%20the%20IBCLC-webFINAL_08-15-11.pdf\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://portal.ilca.org/files/resources/ilca_publications/Role%20%20Impact%20of%20the%20IBCLC-webFINAL_08-15-11.pdf\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOgbo FA, Akombi BJ, Ahmed KY, Rwabilimbo AG, Ogbo AO, Uwaibi NE, et al. Breastfeeding in the community\u0026mdash;how can partners/fathers help? A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2):413. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020413\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/ijerph17020413\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGoffman E. Behavior in public places: notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free; 1963.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStearns CA. Breastfeeding and the Good Maternal Body. Gend Soc. 1999;13(3):308\u0026ndash;25.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHanell L. The failing body: Narratives of breastfeeding troubles and shame. J Linguistic Anthropol. 2017;27(2):232\u0026ndash;51. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12158\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/jola.12158\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDeurzen-Smith V. Everyday mysteries: Existential dimensions of psychotherapy. (No Title). 1997.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"international-breastfeeding-journal","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ibfj","sideBox":"Learn more about [International Breastfeeding Journal](http://internationalbreastfeedingjournal.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"13006","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/13006/3","title":"International Breastfeeding Journal","twitterHandle":"@BioMedCentral","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4560043/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4560043/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground: \u003c/strong\u003eMost women can produce enough milk to exclusively breastfeed. However, a small cohort are prevented from doing so due to a condition known as \u003cem\u003eprimary low milk supply\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAim: \u003c/strong\u003eTo provide new insights into how mothers with primary low milk supply experience help and support from professionals, volunteers, and partners.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods: \u003c/strong\u003eInterpretative phenomenological analysis was used to explore the lived experiences of nine breastfeeding mothers with primary low milk supply. Hour-long interviews were conducted over Zoom.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults:\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cem\u003eBeing with Others\u003c/em\u003e is one of four superordinate themes identified in this study. This theme concerned the participants’ experiences of receiving professional, peer, and voluntary breastfeeding supports. It also considers how participants were supported by their partners. Four sub-themes were identified: \u003cem\u003eDisconnected Encounters\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003ePerceiving Judgement from Others\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eBeing in a Safe Space\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eHaving a Saviour\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion:\u003c/strong\u003e The interactions that mothers with primary low milk supply have with various \u003cem\u003eothers\u003c/em\u003e in their world (health care professionals, lactation consultants, peer breastfeeding supporters, and partners) can shape how they view themselves and can have a profound impact on their breastfeeding journey. The encounters of participants with healthcare professionals revealed a lack of rapport, intrusive hands-on support, poor perceived quality of breastfeeding support and a heightened sensitivity to language and tone. Mothers with primary low milk supply value empathy and emotional support from lactation professionals as much as they value skilled lactation support. We recommend that healthcare professionals receive education concerning primary low milk supply and communication skills training on the provision of sensitive person-centred breastfeeding support.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Breastfeeding with Primary Low Milk Supply: A Phenomenological Exploration of Mother’s Lived Experiences of Professional and Peer Support","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-07-01 09:33:42","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4560043/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2024-11-11T01:49:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-11-01T19:16:51+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"19667054448749333910079312767671780386","date":"2024-11-01T04:05:52+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"132529325622759302316689063152088614371","date":"2024-10-15T13:50:23+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"197966987253845494201335270397781461890","date":"2024-10-15T05:52:03+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"108204477385820571073519034251563196543","date":"2024-10-12T18:07:45+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2024-07-10T02:19:23+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"203485549218428168039648281693342994942","date":"2024-06-27T14:06:35+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"316973444142222065589679785412961413329","date":"2024-06-24T01:10:33+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-06-21T13:47:58+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-06-14T04:45:19+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-06-14T04:43:45+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"International Breastfeeding Journal","date":"2024-06-10T20:46:25+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"international-breastfeeding-journal","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ibfj","sideBox":"Learn more about [International Breastfeeding Journal](http://internationalbreastfeedingjournal.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"13006","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/13006/3","title":"International Breastfeeding Journal","twitterHandle":"@BioMedCentral","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC/SO AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"bded71e0-fae1-4b4b-8e81-cefd6bfe8bce","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 1st, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-02-03T16:04:04+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4560043","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00699-4","journal":{"identity":"international-breastfeeding-journal","isVorOnly":false,"title":"International Breastfeeding Journal"},"publishedOn":"2025-01-27 15:58:08","publishedOnDateReadable":"January 27th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-07-01 09:33:42","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s13006-025-00699-4","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00699-4","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4560043","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4560043","identity":"rs-4560043","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"oE6Zbj460LM0Up2FdVbMZ","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}