Modeling Opposite Effects of an Additive on Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation and Crystal Solubility of Protein Solutions

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View at publisher

Abstract

In protein solutions, an additive that increases protein-protein attractive interactions is expected to decrease protein crystal solubility and raise temperature of liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). In contrast, addition of 0.10-M 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonate (HEPES) to lysozyme-NaCl aqueous solutions at constant pH (7.4) and ionic strength (0.20 M) decreases solubility but lowers LLPS temperature. This leads to a broadening of LLPS metastability gap in the phase diagram and an enhancement of protein crystallization yield from LLPS. We theoretically examine the effect of HEPES on both solubility and LLPS boundaries using a colloid model. Under the hypothesis that HEPES stabilizes protein-protein contacts in the crystal lattice by physical cross-linking, we apply cell theory to describe the thermodynamic behavior of the crystalline phase and use solubility data to show that HEPES increases protein-protein attraction energy by 2.7%. Since an increase in attraction incorrectly predicts a raise in LLPS temperature, we consider that HEPES also enhances the anisotropic character of protein-protein interactions. To describe the thermodynamic behavior of the solution phase, we start from Barker-Henderson second-order perturbation theory on the hard-sphere reference fluid with square-well potential and local-compressibility approximation. We modify this model so that it can reproduce the correct mathematical expression of the second virial coefficient. This also leads to a better agreement with Monte Carlo simulations. We then approximately incorporate anisotropy by assuming that the square-well attraction energy is a temperature-dependent average over all particle surface with a given fractional coverage of attractive spots. The attraction energy of the attractive spots is set to be the same as that of protein-protein contacts in the crystal. Only fractional coverage (anisotropy) was varied to successfully fit the effect of HEPES on the LLPS boundary.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-20T11:00:21.680559+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0