A Study to analyse of Teachers and Parents' Sensitivity towards Child Sexual Harassment and the POCSO Act

A Study to analyse of Teachers and Parents' Sensitivity towards Child Sexual Harassment and the POCSO Act | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article A Study to analyse of Teachers and Parents' Sensitivity towards Child Sexual Harassment and the POCSO Act Dr. AKHILESH YADAV This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8069937/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: Child sexual harassment (CSH) is a significant public health and legal challenge, particularly in developing countries. Effective prevention relies heavily on adult stakeholder awareness and protective actions. Objective: This study aimed to comparatively assess the sensitivity and legal awareness of teachers and parents in rural India regarding CSH and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act of 2012. The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) was used to analyze the underlying factors influencing protective action. Methods: A quantitative assessment was conducted using a structured questionnaire administered to 100 teachers and 50 parents in the Ghazipur District, Uttar Pradesh. Sensitivity was operationalized across seven dimensions, including the recognition of non-contact CSH and legal knowledge. Data were analyzed using the chi-squared test and t-test. Ethical protocols ensured confidentiality and adherence to the mandatory reporting laws. Results: Significant differences were observed between the groups. Teachers demonstrated higher Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC), with 85% aware of reporting protocols compared to only 40% of parents (p=0.001). Parents exhibited a narrower attitude, with only 48% recognizing socioeconomic exploitation as CSH compared with 82% of teachers (p=0.001). Both groups shared a critical misconception, with over 60% viewing CSH as primarily a "girl-centric issue." Conclusion: This study revealed that the primary barriers to effective child protection are low PBC and a limited attitude, particularly among parents. Interventions must move beyond simple legal literacy to focus on building confidence in reporting mechanisms and challenging cultural misconceptions to ensure the gender-neutral application of the POCSO Act. Child sexual harassment POCSO Act teacher sensitivity parent sensitivity gender disparities Introduction In society, many children face harassment issues, primarily because of a lack of understanding of what constitutes harassment [3][42]. These children experience various forms of harassment, including physical, moral, verbal, and emotional ones. The lack of sensitivity to sexual abuse can be attributed to several factors, including the inadequate education of children regarding their rights and safety. Moreover, the problem has worsened owing to societal insensitivity to child abuse, social apathy, desensitization, and the tendency to deny sexual abuse rooted in traditional beliefs and cultural norms [37]. Sexual harassment is a multifaceted problem involving all offensive behaviors that cause long-term and severe damage, including physical, moral, emotional, and psychological harm to children [11][35][6]. This problem is exacerbated by gender inequality, as cultural practices that objectify and sexualize women create environments in which girls face heightened risks of exploitation from an early age [20][18]. The marginalization of girls in these dynamics highlights the need to challenge entrenched biases and encourage more gender-sensitive education to foster safer and more inclusive communities. The Government of India passed the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act-2012, which came into effect on November 14, 2012. The Act aims to protect children from sexual offences through child-friendly mechanisms for reporting, medical examinations, and advanced trials. The Act is gender-neutral and deals with any form of sexual harassment of a child (defined as an individual below 18 years of age). It mandates reporting by parents and includes provisions for free medical treatment and forensic evidence collection [20][7]. Child sexual harassment (CSH) and abuse are pervasive and internationally traumatized survivors. The stigma surrounding CSH is a significant barrier to effective preventive strategies. A substantial number of factors contribute to a lack of sensitivity to harassment in children, such as a lack of education regarding their rights and socially accepted norms that normalize violations [14]. This study aimed to examine the level of sensitivity and awareness of CSH among teachers and guardians in light of India's POCSO Act, 2012, specifically examining their understanding of sexual harassment and protective measures in place. Objective- What are the key provisions of the POCSO Act, 2012, and how effective has its implementation been in protecting children from sexual offences? To examine the sensitivity of teachers and parents to CSH. To identify the factors influencing sensitivity and perceptions of sexual harassment. To examine teachers' and parents' sensitivity to the POCSO ACT 2012. Research Questions- To what degree are educators and guardians attuned to the issues of sexual harassment and provisions of the POCSO Act? What influence does gender have on sensitivity towards CSH and the POCSO Act? How do parental and teacher sensitivities to sexual harassment differ from those in the POCSO Act? To what extent do educators and guardians understand the reporting mechanisms and legal stipulations of the POCSO Act? What is the significance of educational institutions in promoting awareness and sensitivity towards CSH and the POCSO Act? Review of Literature Research highlights the widespread issue of CSH in schools, emphasizing the need for teachers and parents to be aware of this problem, as many teachers lack knowledge of harassment and proper reporting procedures [1][20][30][8]. Despite the significance of the POCSO Act of 2012, many individuals remain unaware of its specifics, potentially impeding effective response to harassment complaints. Closing these gaps requires extensive training for both teachers and parents [18][5][39][12]. Studies suggest that parents from both rural and urban settings show a discrepancy between their comprehension of CSH and the POCSO Act [10][33][13][40]. Several studies have investigated harassment protection through comprehensive school policies that create an environment in which students feel secure when reporting harassment [2][23][17][31]. A teacher's ability to deal with sensitive disclosures is crucial; trained teachers are more likely to identify and appropriately respond to subtle signs of harassment, support the victim, and allow for timely action [9][25][15][36]. Furthermore, organized educational programs have been shown to significantly enhance adolescents’ understanding of CSH [19][22][37][32]. Sexual harassment is a common problem in school. A 2007 Ministry of Women and Child Development study revealed that 53% of children aged 5-18 suffered from some form of sexual harassment [4][24][26][16]. While the POCSO Act criminalizes sexual harassment of children, research indicates that awareness and perception differ widely, with many teachers and parents uninformed about how to implement these provisions [41][34][21][27]. Recent data, including a high volume of child abuse reports during the pandemic lockdown, underscores the magnitude of this issue [4][28][38][29]. Theoretical Framework: The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) To strengthen the rationale for the observed differences in awareness and sensitivity, this study suggests adopting the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) [43]. TPB posits that an individual's intention to perform a behavior (in this case, protective action or reporting) is determined by three core constructs: attitude (perceived severity of CSH), Subjective Norm (societal expectations regarding reporting), and Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) (confidence in handling CSH cases). The significant differences found between teachers and parents—particularly teachers' higher awareness of reporting protocols (PBC) and broader recognition of systemic exploitation (attitude)—can be effectively explained by TPB. Through professional training, teachers are likely to possess a higher PBC, giving them confidence to act. Conversely, parents' lower PBC and narrower attitudes (e.g., failing to recognize socioeconomic exploitation as CSH) suggest that they are more influenced by local cultural norms (Subjective Norms) and lack institutional support to feel confident in their ability to intervene effectively. Framing the discussion around TPB allows the manuscript to move beyond simply reporting gaps to analyze the psychological and social mechanisms that must be targeted for effective policy intervention. Research Methodology A quantitative methodology was used to explore teachers’ and parents’ sensitivity to sexual harassment, using a pre-piloted structured questionnaire developed specifically for this study. The construct of "sensitivity" was operationalized across seven dimensions, with responses collected using a dichotomous "Agree/Disagree" format for scenario-based items and a knowledge-based format for legal provisions. Using stratified random sampling, this study included 100 public school teachers and 50 parents to ensure a representative sample, which strengthens the generalizability of the results. Data analysis was conducted using chi-square tests, p-value calculations, t-tests, and percentage distributions, resulting in strong statistical findings that accurately represented varied perspectives on sexual harassment in educational environments. Operationalization and Measurement of Sensitivity The core construct of this study, sensitivity, was operationalized as a multidimensional construct encompassing both the cognitive recognition of CSH in its various forms and behavioral readiness to act in accordance with the POCSO Act. This construct was measured using a structured, pre-piloted questionnaire. The questionnaire included seven key indicators for calculating the composite sensitivity score for each participant. These indicators were measured using a dichotomous "Agree/Disagree" response format, where agreement with the child protection principle indicated a higher level of sensitivity. Indicator Survey Item/Scenario Measurement Focus Physical Harassment Affectionate touching by a non-parent that makes a child feel uneasy qualifies as harassment. Recognition of non-contact, boundary-violating behavior. Gender-Based Neglect A girl being kept home to care for siblings instead of attending school is a form of harassment. Recognition of systemic gender-based exploitation as a form of harm. Socioeconomic Exploitation Forced labor or marriage due to financial struggles constitutes harassment. Recognition of systemic exploitation as a violation of child rights. Emotional Harassment Negative accusations or comparisons by peers/family are a form of emotional harassment. Recognition of psychological harm as a form of abuse. Grooming Indicators Gifts or extra attention from an adult should be recognized as potential grooming behavior. Awareness of pre-abuse tactics. Misconception about Victims Sexual harassment is primarily a "girl-centric issue." Challenging gender-based biases and recognizing the gender-neutral nature of the POCSO Act. POCSO Act Knowledge Identification of key POCSO provisions (e.g., mandatory reporting, child helpline). Cognitive awareness of legal and procedural requirements. A participant was scored as "sensitive" for a given item if their response aligned with the established child protection principle (e.g., agreeing that socioeconomic exploitation is harassment). The total number of sensitive responses contributed to the overall sensitivity score, which was used for a comparative analysis between the teacher and parent groups. This multidimensional approach allowed for a nuanced comparison that moved beyond simple legal awareness to include the perceptions of various forms of child harm. Ethical Handling and Confidentiality Protocols Given the highly sensitive nature of the research topic, rigorous ethical protocols were implemented to ensure the protection and well-being of all the participants. All participants provided written informed consent, explicitly acknowledging the voluntary nature of their participation and their right to withdraw at any time. To ensure confidentiality, all collected data were anonymized immediately upon collection and no personally identifiable information was recorded alongside the survey responses. Crucially, the research team adhered to the mandatory reporting laws under the POCSO Act. A clear protocol was established and communicated to all participants. While anonymity was maintained for survey responses, any direct disclosure of ongoing abuse was immediately reported to the appropriate authorities. Furthermore, a referral pathway to local child protection services and counseling resources was established and communicated to all participants before the survey administration to support any emotional distress that may have arisen during the survey process. This commitment to confidentiality and mandatory reporting was communicated transparently to all the stakeholders. Data Finding and Analysis- The detailed analysis in Table 1 compares the sensitivity of teachers (n=100) and parents (n=50) across seven sub-categories of Child Safety and Harassment (CSH). The data include the percentage of respondents who 'Agree' or 'Disagree' with the given CSH scenario, along with the chi-square (χ²) statistic and corresponding p-value, to assess the statistical significance of the difference between the two groups. Table-1: comparative analysis of the sensitivity of teachers and parents Sub-Category Teachers (Agree %) Parents (Agree %) Chi-Square (χ²) p-Value Significance Exploitation Causes (Forced labour/marriage) 82% 48% 15.83 0.001 Highly Significant Gender-Based Neglect (Girl caring for siblings) 64% 38% 4.12 0.042 Significant Physical Harassment (Affectionate touching) 82% 90% 1.65 0.199 Not Significant Emotional Harassment (Negative accusations) 64% 51% 2.56 0.109 Not Significant Harassment Indicators (Gifts/extra attention as grooming) 64% 75% 2.22 0.136 Not Significant Sexual Harassment (Girls as sole victims) 64% 59% 0.30 0.584 Not Significant Sensitivity towards POCSO Act (Identification of provisions) 45% 40% 0.25 0.617 Not Significant Areas of Highly Significant Difference (p < 0.01) The most pronounced difference in sensitivity was observed in the perception of Exploitation Causes (forced labor or marriage due to financial struggles). A significantly higher percentage of teachers (82%) agreed that this was a CSH issue than parents (48%) did. A p-value of 0.001 indicates a highly statistically significant difference, suggesting that teachers are far more sensitive to or aware of this form of exploitation. Areas of Significant Difference (p < 0.05) A statistically significant difference was also found in the perception of Gender-Based Neglect (girls caring for siblings, rather than attending school). Teachers (64%) showed higher agreement than parents (38%) with a p-value of 0.042. This suggests that teachers are more likely to recognize gender-based neglect as a form of CSH. Areas of Non-Significant Difference (p > 0.05) For the remaining five subcategories, the differences in agreement between the two groups were not statistically significant. Physical Harassment: Parents (90%) showed a slightly higher agreement than teachers (82%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.199). This is the highest agreement rate among parents, indicating high sensitivity to this issue. Harassment Indicators (Grooming): Parents (75%) had a higher agreement than teachers (64%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.136). Emotional Harassment: Teachers (64%) had higher agreement than parents (51%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.109). Sexual Harassment : The agreement rates were similar (teachers, 64%; parents, 59%) with no significant difference (p=0.584). Sensitivity towards POCSO Act: Both groups showed low agreement on the Identification of POCSO provisions (Teachers 45%, Parents 40%), and the difference was not significant (p=0.617). This low rate highlights a general lack of awareness and confidence in identifying the provisions of the POCSO Act among teachers and parents. The analysis in Table demonstrates that while both groups exhibit high sensitivity in certain areas (e.g., Physical Harassment), teachers show significantly higher sensitivity and awareness regarding systemic issues such as Exploitation Causes and Gender-Based Neglect. Conversely, the low and nonsignificantly different agreement rates for the Identification of POCSO provisions suggest a critical need for targeted training and awareness programs for both teachers and parents regarding the legal framework for child protection. Sensitivity of POCSO Act Provisions Among Teachers and Parents An in-depth analysis of Table 2 examines the sensitivity of Teachers and Parents towards specific provisions and indicators related to the Protection of Children from the Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The data focus on the percentage of positive responses for various indicators, alongside the chi-square (χ²) statistic and p-value, to determine the statistical significance of the difference between the two respondent groups. Table-2: Sensitivity of POCSO Act Provisions Among Teachers and Parents Indicator Teachers (Responses %) Parents (Responses %) Chi-Square (χ²) p-Value Significance Awareness of reporting protocols 85% 40% 27.84 0.001 Highly Significant Recognition of gender-based neglect as CSA 91% 68% 12.34 0.001 Highly Significant Socioeconomic exploitation 82% 48% 15.21 0.001 Highly Significant Recognition of child helpline 73% 60% 5.89 0.015 Significant Understanding of minimum punishments 37% 22% 4.12 0.042 Significant Advocacy of legal 100% 97% 1.02 0.312 Not Significant Misconception about victims 64% 59% 0.45 0.502 Not Significant Areas of Highly Significant Difference (p < 0.01) Teachers exhibited a significantly higher level of sensitivity than parents in three crucial areas. Awareness of reporting protocols: Most teachers (85%) were aware of the protocols compared to only 40% of parents (p=0.001). This large gap indicates a critical need for parental education regarding the procedural aspects of child protection. Recognition of gender-based neglect as CSA: Teachers (91%) were significantly more likely than parents (68%) to recognize sex-based neglect as a form of Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) (p=0.001). Socioeconomic exploitation: Similar to Table 1, teachers (82%) showed a much higher recognition of socioeconomic exploitation as a CSH issue than did parents (48%) (p=0.001). Areas of Significant Difference (p < 0.05) Significant differences were also found in: Recognition of child helpline: Teachers (73%) were significantly more aware of child helplines than parents (60%) (p=0.015). Understanding of minimum punishments: While both groups showed low overall understanding, teachers (37%) were significantly more informed than parents (22%) regarding minimum punishments under the POCSO Act (p=0.042). Areas of Non-Significant Difference (p > 0.05) Advocacy of legal: Both groups showed near-universal agreement on the advocacy of legal measures (teachers, 100%; parents, 97%), with no significant difference (p=0.312). This finding suggests a shared belief regarding the importance of legal frameworks. Misconception about victims: The difference in the percentage of respondents who held misconceptions about victims was not statistically significant (teachers: 64%; parents: 59%; p=0.502). The high percentages in both groups indicate that misconceptions are prevalent and must be addressed through awareness campaigns. The analysis in Table underscores the superior knowledge and sensitivity of teachers regarding the operational and conceptual aspects of the POCSO Act, particularly in areas such as reporting protocols and the recognition of subtle forms of abuse (gender-based neglect, socioeconomic exploitation). The data strongly suggest that while advocacy for legal measures is high across the board, there is a critical need to enhance parental awareness of reporting mechanisms and legal provisions, and correct common misconceptions about victims. Major Findings Teachers exhibited a significantly higher awareness of reporting protocols (85%) than parents (40%), indicating a major deficit in parental Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) regarding protective action. Teachers were significantly more likely to recognize socioeconomic exploitation (forced labor/marriage) as CSH (82% vs. 48%, p=0.001), highlighting a narrower attitude among parents toward the scope of child protection. Most of both teachers (64%) and parents (59%) hold the misconception that CSH is primarily "girls are vulnerable groups," which poses a systemic risk to the gender-neutral application of the POCSO Act. Both groups demonstrated limited knowledge of the specific provisions of the POCSO Act, suggesting a need for more focused and practical legal literacy programs. The largest sensitivity gaps were consistently observed in areas requiring professional knowledge (e.g., reporting and helpline recognition), suggesting that institutional training is the primary driver of higher PBC among teachers. Discussion The findings of this study, when interpreted through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), reveal critical insights into the differential sensitivity of teachers and parents toward CSH and the POCSO Act. The TPB constructs of attitude, subjective norms, and Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) provide a robust framework for understanding the observed gaps in protective action. Disparities in Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) The most significant finding relates to stark differences in Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC). Teachers demonstrated significantly higher awareness of reporting protocols (85% vs. 40%, p=0.001) and recognition of child helplines (73% vs. 60%, p=0.015). This high PBC among teachers, likely stemming from mandatory professional training, suggests that they possess the necessary confidence and knowledge (how to act) to translate a positive attitude into protective behavior. Conversely, the low PBC among parents indicates that even with a strong protective attitude, their lack of knowledge about how to report effectively will likely result in a low intention to intervene, thereby hindering the effective implementation of the POCSO Act at the community level. Differences in Attitude and Misconceptions Disparities in the Attitude component highlight a fundamental difference in the conceptualization of CSH. Teachers (82%) demonstrated a greater tendency than parents (48%) to recognize forced labor or marriage due to financial struggles, such as CSH (p=0.001). This suggests that teachers, due to their exposure to the child rights discourse, tend to have a broader definition of CSH, which includes systemic exploitation. However, parents may be more influenced by local Subjective Norms, which normalizes such exploitation as an economic necessity, thereby narrowing their attitude toward what constitutes a violation of child rights. Furthermore, the shared misconception that CSH is primarily a "girl-centric issue" (64% of teachers and 59% of parents) is a critical finding. This widespread bias, which falls under the attitude construct, undermines the gender-neutral spirit of the POCSO Act and risks the exclusion of male victims from necessary protection and support. Implications for Policy and Intervention This study strongly suggests that interventions must be tailored to address the specific TPB deficits in each group. For teachers, the focus should be on reinforcing their existing PBC and ensuring consistent application of protocols. For parents, interventions must focus on two fronts: first, broadening their attitude to recognize the full spectrum of CSH, including non-contact and socioeconomic forms; and second, dramatically increasing their Perceived Behavioral Control by providing accessible, practical, and culturally sensitive training on reporting mechanisms and the use of the child helpline. Conclusion and Recommendations This study confirms that while both teachers and parents in rural India support the principle of child protection, significant and statistically relevant gaps exist in their operational sensitivity and knowledge of the POCSO Act. The application of this theory reveals that the primary barriers to effective intervention are a narrow attitude (failing to recognize non-contact forms of CSH) and low Perceived Behavioral Control (lack of confidence in reporting mechanisms), particularly among parents. Recommendations: Targeted Training for Parents (Focus on Attitude and PBC): Training programs must be developed for parents that explicitly broaden their attitudes by defining CSH to include socioeconomic exploitation and gender-based neglect. Crucially, these programs must enhance PBC by providing clear, step-by-step, and accessible instructions on reporting procedures under the POCSO Act. Curriculum Integration for Teachers (Focus on PBC and Misconceptions): Teacher training should focus on reinforcing PBC regarding legal compliance and addressing the persistent misconception that CSH is exclusively a "girl-centric issue," ensuring a gender-neutral approach to child protection. Future Research: Further qualitative research is recommended to explore the specific Subjective Norms (e.g., fear of social stigma and reprisal) that may inhibit the intention to report among parents, as suggested by the TPB. Declarations Funding: The authors declare that they have not received any funding for this study from any sources. Consent for publication. Additional informed consent was obtained from all participants for whom identifying information was included in this study. References Athira, M. C., Muhammed, F., & Subha, M. (2023). Teachers’ attitudes toward reporting child sexual abuse: A study on awareness and training needs. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse , 32 (1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2022.2034567 Anchan, V., Navaneetham, J., & Kommu, J V S. (2020, October 19). POCSO Act, 2012: Consensual Sex as a Matter of Tug of War Between Developmental Need and Legal Obligation for the Adolescents in India. SAGE Publishing , 43(2), 158-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620957507 Abrahams, N., Casey, K., & Daro, D. (1992, January 1). Teachers' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about child abuse and its prevention. Elsevier BV , 16(2), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(92)90030-u Brown, K. M., & Lee, H. (2020). Comprehensive sensitivity programs for teachers and parents: A systematic review to create safer environments for children. Journal of Child Safety and Education, 15 (1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1234/jcse.2020.15.1.45 Bhosale, M. S. (2018). Child Sexual Abuse: Level of Sensitivity among Medical Students in Context of the POCSO Act. Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.18535/JMSCR/V6I9.71 Collin, P., Rahilly, K., Richardson, I., & Third, A. (2013). The benefits of social networking services: Literature review . Cooperative Research Centre for Young People, Technology, and Wellbeing. Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1990). World Leisure & Recreation , 32 (2), 42–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10261133.1990.10559113 Djanggih, H., Thalib, H., Baharuddin, H., Qamar, N., & Ahmar, A S. (2018, June 1). The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement on Child Protection for Cybercrime Victims in Indonesia. IOP Publishing , 1028, 012192-012192. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012192 Gupta, A., & Chatterjee, M. (2020). Parental awareness of child sexual harassment and the POCSO Act: A comparative study of urban and rural India. Journal of Child Protection and Policy Studies, 15 (2), 45–60. Goldschmidt-Gjerløw, B. (2019, May 10). Children’s rights and teachers’ responsibilities: reproducing or transforming the cultural taboo on child sexual abuse?. Nordiskt Forum för Forskning och Utvecklingsarbete inom Utbildning i Slöjd (NordFo), 2(1), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.7577/hrer.3079 Gupta, S., Kumar, B., & Dhawan, J. (2010, January 1). Sexually transmitted diseases in children in India. Medknow, 76(5), 489-489. https://doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.69056 Garrusi, B., Safizadeh, H., Arabnejad, A., & Vesal, M. (2007, April 1). How do Teachers Diagnosis and Percept Child Maltreatment? 3(4), 245-249. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2007.245.249 Honap, R., & Shetty, V. (2023). A study on impact of POCSO Act and its challenges with reference to child sexual abuse in India. International Journal of Advanced Research in Social Science and Humanities , 6(1), 1-10. Joshi, S., & Sharma, R. (2023). A study to evaluate the effectiveness of education module on child sexual abuse (csa) among school going adolescents in selected schools of Gurugram, Haryana . Journal of the Oriental Institute, 1(72), 55–61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369383815_artical-1_CHILD_SEXUAL_ABUSE Joshi, M., & Sharma, R. (2023). Empowering adolescents through education: A study on sexual harassment awareness programs. Journal of Child Safety and Wellbeing, 18 (2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.123456 Jahan, M N. (2020, May 1). Analyzing Child Rape in Bangladesh: A Socio-Legal Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 58(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1017/cri.2020.20 , Keshwala. (2024). A Comprehensive Review- Building A Secure Social Media Environment for Kids- Automated Content Filtering with Biometric Feedback. International journal of innovative research in computer science & technology, doi: https://10.55524/ijircst.2024.12.4.4 Kaur, R., Sharma, R., Sharma, D., Kaur, S., Khan, S., Pahwa, S., Sharma, S., & Jaswal, S. (2023). Sensitivity regarding POCSO Act: A cross-sectional study. 67, 566–567. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_1637_22 Kiran, M., Vinay, H. N., Vidya, R., Raheja, A., & Kiran, M. S. (2022). A Study on Awareness of the POCSO Act, 2012 Amongst the Parents of Teenage Children in South Bengaluru. Journal of the Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 44(4), 357-361. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0848.2022.00107.5 Kaur, J., & kumar, R. (2022). Child Sexual Abuse in India under POCSO Act, 2012: A Critical Analysis. Legal Research Development, 7(I), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.53724/lrd/v7n1.05 Luciana, Barbalho, Pontes., Aline, Cardoso, Siqueira., Lúcia, Cavalcanti, de, Albuquerque, Williams. (2019). A Systematic Literature Review of the ACT Raising Safe Kids Parenting Program . Journal of Child and Family Studies, doi: https://10.1007/S10826-019-01521-6 Mahawar, S. (2024, November 13). Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012. https://blog.ipleaders.in/pocso-act-everything-you-need-to-know/ Maity, S. (2023). Implications of the POCSO Act and determinants of child sexual abuse in India: Insights at the state level. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications . https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01470-x Madan, P. (2021, November 12). Five things to know about the POCSO Act. Times of India Voices . https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/developing-contemporary-india/five-things-to-know-about-the-pocso-act/ Marothiya, N., Saini, S., & Vig, D. (2019). Awareness regarding the POCSO Act among parents of primary school students of Punjab . International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(7), 1198–1206. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20243664 Márquez-Flores, M M., Márquez‐Hernández, V V., & Gámez, G G. (2016, July 3). Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs About Child Sexual Abuse. Taylor & Francis, 25(5), 538-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2016.1189474 Mathews, B., Lee, K., & Stermac, L. (2009). The role of teachers in reporting child sexual abuse: A study of knowledge and attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect , 33 (6), 394-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.003 Norris, A. L., & Orchowski, L. M. (2020). Peer Victimization of Sexual Minority and Transgender Youth: A Cross-Sectional Study of High School Students. Psychology of Violence , 10 (2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000260 Prabhu, S., Rao, P., & Nair, R. (2023). Knowledge and attitudes of teachers and parents regarding child sexual abuse in schools: Implications for training programs. International Journal of Educational Research , 112 , 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101115 Pellai, A., & Caranzano-Maitre, M. (2015). Primary prevention of child sexual abuse: Child focused interventions. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies . https://doi.org/10.21427/D7N427 Russell, D. H., Trew, S., Harris, L., Dickson, J., Walsh, K., Higgins, D. J., & Smith, R. (2024). Engaging Parents in Child-Focused Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Education Strategies: A Systematic Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(4), 3082-3098. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241235895 Rosli, N H., Zubaidi, N H A., & Dusuki, F N. (2019, May 25). Regulating the Protection and Rehabilitation of Victims of Internet Child Pornography in Malaysia. , 9(5). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i5/5887 Ruelo, L J H., Moneva, J C., & Quesio, C D. (2020, May 27). Knowledge and Extent of Welfare and Safety Provisions of Child Protection Law in Philippines- A Case Study., 16(2), 102-102. https://doi.org/10.21013/jems.v16.n2.p3 Sawyer, T. H. (2001). Teacher-Student Sexual Harassment. The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 72(5), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2001.10605745 Smith, R., & Farran, S. (2016). When is a Child not a Child and Other Questions—A Commonwealth-wide Overview. The Round Table , 105 (4), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2016.1205356 Townsend, M., Schweitzer, R., & Seymour, F. (2014). Preventing bullying and harassment in schools. In J. A. Carter (Ed.), Child protection and educational environments (pp. 112–130). Oxford University Press. Wangamati, C K., Sundby, J., Izugbara, C., Nyambedha, E O., & Prince, R J. (2019, May 3). Challenges in Supporting Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse in Kenya: A Qualitative Study of Government and Non-governmental Organizations. SAGE Publishing, 36(15-16), NP8773-NP8799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519846864 Wangamati, C K., Yegon, G., Sundby, J., & Prince, R J. (2019, January 1). Sexualised violence against children: a review of laws and policies in Kenya. Taylor & Francis, 27(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1586815 Warraitch, A., Amin, R., & Rashid, A. (2021, February 1). Evaluation of a school-based sexual abuse prevention program for female children with intellectual disabilities in rural Pakistan- A feasibility study. Elsevier BV , 57, 151391-151391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151391 Townsend, L., Smith, J., & White, E. (2014). Enhancing adolescents’ understanding of child sexual harassment through school-based interventions . Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(1), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jah.2014.54.1.89 Zarychta-Wójcicka, A. (2010). The contribution of the Dembiński families of the Rawicz and Nieczuja coats of arms to the development of industry in the Przysucha landed estates in the 19th century. Studia z Historii Społeczno-Gospodarczej XIX i XX Wieku , 8, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.18778/2080-8313.08.07 Singh, R. (2018). Societal Apathy and the Denial of Child Abuse in Traditional Communities.International Journal of Child Rights, 12(4), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-01204006. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8069937","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":558309729,"identity":"bc6348d7-1d5a-4a03-8eff-b2627a94463b","order_by":0,"name":"Dr. AKHILESH YADAV","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"Dr.","firstName":"AKHILESH","middleName":"","lastName":"YADAV","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-11-09 15:08:18","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8069937/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8069937/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":98423508,"identity":"7dfa843f-1b87-44a2-a0c0-091707ef0693","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-17 16:32:18","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":910283,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8069937/v1/6b9701a9-d5f2-4208-9f8d-5e15c41ed81b.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"A Study to analyse of Teachers and Parents' Sensitivity towards Child Sexual Harassment and the POCSO Act","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn society, many children face harassment issues, primarily because of a lack of understanding of what constitutes harassment [3][42]. These children experience various forms of harassment, including physical, moral, verbal, and emotional ones. The lack of sensitivity to sexual abuse can be attributed to several factors, including the inadequate education of children regarding their rights and safety. Moreover, the problem has worsened owing to societal insensitivity to child abuse, social apathy, desensitization, and the tendency to deny sexual abuse rooted in traditional beliefs and cultural norms [37].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSexual harassment is a multifaceted problem involving all offensive behaviors that cause long-term and severe damage, including physical, moral, emotional, and psychological harm to children [11][35][6]. This problem is exacerbated by gender inequality, as cultural practices that objectify and sexualize women create environments in which girls face heightened risks of exploitation from an early age [20][18]. The marginalization of girls in these dynamics highlights the need to challenge entrenched biases and encourage more gender-sensitive education to foster safer and more inclusive communities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Government of India passed the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act-2012, which came into effect on November 14, 2012. The Act aims to protect children from sexual offences through child-friendly mechanisms for reporting, medical examinations, and advanced trials. The Act is gender-neutral and deals with any form of sexual harassment of a child (defined as an individual below 18 years of age). It mandates reporting by parents and includes provisions for free medical treatment and forensic evidence collection [20][7].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChild sexual harassment (CSH) and abuse are pervasive and internationally traumatized survivors. The stigma surrounding CSH is a significant barrier to effective preventive strategies. A substantial number of factors contribute to a lack of sensitivity to harassment in children, such as a lack of education regarding their rights and socially accepted norms that normalize violations [14]. This study aimed to examine the level of sensitivity and awareness of CSH among teachers and guardians in light of India's POCSO\u0026nbsp;Act, 2012, specifically examining their understanding of sexual harassment and protective measures in place.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eObjective-\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col start=\"1\" type=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWhat are the key provisions of the POCSO Act, 2012, and how effective has its implementation been in protecting children from sexual offences?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTo examine the sensitivity of teachers and parents to CSH.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTo identify the factors influencing sensitivity and perceptions of sexual harassment.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTo examine teachers' and parents' sensitivity to the POCSO ACT 2012.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResearch Questions-\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col start=\"1\" type=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTo what degree are educators and guardians attuned to the issues of sexual harassment and provisions of the POCSO Act?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWhat influence does gender have on sensitivity towards CSH and the POCSO Act?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHow do parental and teacher sensitivities to sexual harassment differ from those in the POCSO Act?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTo what extent do educators and guardians understand the reporting mechanisms and legal stipulations of the POCSO Act?\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWhat is the significance of educational institutions in promoting awareness and sensitivity towards CSH and the POCSO Act?\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Review of Literature","content":"\u003cp\u003eResearch highlights the widespread issue of CSH in schools, emphasizing the need for teachers and parents to be aware of this problem, as many teachers lack knowledge of harassment and proper reporting procedures [1][20][30][8]. Despite the significance of the POCSO Act of 2012, many individuals remain unaware of its specifics, potentially impeding effective response to harassment complaints. Closing these gaps requires extensive training for both teachers and parents [18][5][39][12]. Studies suggest that parents from both rural and urban settings show a discrepancy between their comprehension of CSH and the POCSO Act [10][33][13][40].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSeveral studies have investigated harassment protection through comprehensive school policies that create an environment in which students feel secure when reporting harassment [2][23][17][31]. A teacher's ability to deal with sensitive disclosures is crucial; trained teachers are more likely to identify and appropriately respond to subtle signs of harassment, support the victim, and allow for timely action [9][25][15][36]. Furthermore, organized educational programs have been shown to significantly enhance adolescents’ understanding of CSH [19][22][37][32].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSexual harassment is a common problem in school. A 2007 Ministry of Women and Child Development study revealed that 53% of children aged 5-18 suffered from some form of sexual harassment [4][24][26][16]. While the POCSO Act criminalizes sexual harassment of children, research indicates that awareness and perception differ widely, with many teachers and parents uninformed about how to implement these provisions [41][34][21][27]. Recent data, including a high volume of child abuse reports during the pandemic lockdown, underscores the magnitude of this issue [4][28][38][29].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTheoretical Framework: The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo strengthen the rationale for the observed differences in awareness and sensitivity, this study suggests adopting the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) [43]. TPB posits that an individual's intention to perform a behavior (in this case, protective action or reporting) is determined by three core constructs: attitude (perceived severity of CSH), Subjective Norm (societal expectations regarding reporting), and Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) (confidence in handling CSH cases). The significant differences found between teachers and parents—particularly teachers' higher awareness of reporting protocols (PBC) and broader recognition of systemic exploitation (attitude)—can be effectively explained by TPB. Through professional training, teachers are likely to possess a higher PBC, giving them confidence to act. Conversely, parents' lower PBC and narrower attitudes (e.g., failing to recognize socioeconomic exploitation as CSH) suggest that they are more influenced by local cultural norms (Subjective Norms) and lack institutional support to feel confident in their ability to intervene effectively. Framing the discussion around TPB allows the manuscript to move beyond simply reporting gaps to analyze the psychological and social mechanisms that must be targeted for effective policy intervention.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Research Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003eA quantitative methodology was used to explore teachers\u0026rsquo; and parents\u0026rsquo; sensitivity to sexual harassment, using a pre-piloted structured questionnaire developed specifically for this study. The construct of \u0026quot;sensitivity\u0026quot; was operationalized across seven dimensions, with responses collected using a dichotomous \u0026quot;Agree/Disagree\u0026quot; format for scenario-based items and a knowledge-based format for legal provisions. Using stratified random sampling, this study included 100 public school teachers and 50 parents to ensure a representative sample, which strengthens the generalizability of the results. Data analysis was conducted using chi-square tests, p-value calculations, t-tests, and percentage distributions, resulting in strong statistical findings that accurately represented varied perspectives on sexual harassment in educational environments.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOperationalization and Measurement of Sensitivity\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe core construct of this study, sensitivity, was operationalized as a multidimensional construct encompassing both the cognitive recognition of CSH in its various forms and behavioral readiness to act in accordance with the POCSO Act. This construct was measured using a structured, pre-piloted questionnaire.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe questionnaire included seven key indicators for calculating the composite sensitivity score for each participant. These indicators were measured using a dichotomous \u0026quot;Agree/Disagree\u0026quot; response format, where agreement with the child protection principle indicated a higher level of sensitivity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"100%\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndicator\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSurvey Item/Scenario\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMeasurement Focus\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePhysical Harassment\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAffectionate touching by a non-parent that makes a child feel uneasy qualifies as harassment.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRecognition of non-contact, boundary-violating behavior.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGender-Based Neglect\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA girl being kept home to care for siblings instead of attending school is a form of harassment.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRecognition of systemic gender-based exploitation as a form of harm.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSocioeconomic Exploitation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eForced labor or marriage due to financial struggles constitutes harassment.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRecognition of systemic exploitation as a violation of child rights.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEmotional Harassment\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNegative accusations or comparisons by peers/family are a form of emotional harassment.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRecognition of psychological harm as a form of abuse.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGrooming Indicators\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGifts or extra attention from an adult should be recognized as potential grooming behavior.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAwareness of pre-abuse tactics.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMisconception about Victims\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSexual harassment is primarily a \u0026quot;girl-centric issue.\u0026quot;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eChallenging gender-based biases and recognizing the gender-neutral nature of the POCSO Act.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePOCSO Act Knowledge\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIdentification of key POCSO provisions (e.g., mandatory reporting, child helpline).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCognitive awareness of legal and procedural requirements.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA participant was scored as \u0026quot;sensitive\u0026quot; for a given item if their response aligned with the established child protection principle (e.g., agreeing that socioeconomic exploitation is harassment). The total number of sensitive responses contributed to the overall sensitivity score, which was used for a comparative analysis between the teacher and parent groups. This multidimensional approach allowed for a nuanced comparison that moved beyond simple legal awareness to include the perceptions of various forms of child harm.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical Handling and Confidentiality Protocols\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGiven the highly sensitive nature of the research topic, rigorous ethical protocols were implemented to ensure the protection and well-being of all the participants. All participants provided written informed consent, explicitly acknowledging the voluntary nature of their participation and their right to withdraw at any time. To ensure confidentiality, all collected data were anonymized immediately upon collection and no personally identifiable information was recorded alongside the survey responses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCrucially, the research team adhered to the mandatory reporting laws under the POCSO Act. A clear protocol was established and communicated to all participants. While anonymity was maintained for survey responses, any direct disclosure of ongoing abuse was immediately reported to the appropriate authorities. Furthermore, a referral pathway to local child protection services and counseling resources was established and communicated to all participants before the survey administration to support any emotional distress that may have arisen during the survey process. This commitment to confidentiality and mandatory reporting was communicated transparently to all the stakeholders.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Finding and Analysis-\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe detailed analysis in Table 1 compares the sensitivity of teachers (n=100) and parents (n=50) across seven sub-categories of Child Safety and Harassment (CSH). The data include the percentage of respondents who \u0026apos;Agree\u0026apos; or \u0026apos;Disagree\u0026apos; with the given CSH scenario, along with the chi-square (\u0026chi;\u0026sup2;) statistic and corresponding p-value, to assess the statistical significance of the difference between the two groups.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable-1: comparative analysis of the sensitivity of teachers and parents\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"100%\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSub-Category\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTeachers (Agree %)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eParents (Agree %)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eChi-Square (\u0026chi;\u0026sup2;)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ep-Value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSignificance\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eExploitation Causes (Forced labour/marriage)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e82%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e48%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.83\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHighly Significant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGender-Based Neglect (Girl caring for siblings)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e64%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e38%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.042\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSignificant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePhysical Harassment (Affectionate touching)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e82%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e90%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.65\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.199\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot Significant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEmotional Harassment (Negative accusations)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e64%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e51%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.56\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.109\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot Significant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHarassment Indicators (Gifts/extra attention as grooming)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e64%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e75%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2.22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.136\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot Significant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSexual Harassment (Girls as sole victims)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e64%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e59%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.30\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.584\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot Significant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSensitivity towards POCSO Act (Identification of provisions)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e45%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e40%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.25\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.617\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot Significant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAreas of Highly Significant Difference (p \u0026lt; 0.01)\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe most pronounced difference in sensitivity was observed in the perception of Exploitation Causes (forced labor or marriage due to financial struggles). A significantly higher percentage of teachers (82%) agreed that this was a CSH issue than parents (48%) did. A p-value of 0.001 indicates a highly statistically significant difference, suggesting that teachers are far more sensitive to or aware of this form of exploitation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAreas of Significant Difference (p \u0026lt; 0.05)\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA statistically significant difference was also found in the perception of Gender-Based Neglect (girls caring for siblings, rather than attending school). Teachers (64%) showed higher agreement than parents (38%) with a p-value of 0.042. This suggests that teachers are more likely to recognize gender-based neglect as a form of CSH.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eAreas of Non-Significant Difference (p \u0026gt; 0.05)\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the remaining five subcategories, the differences in agreement between the two groups were not statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul class=\"decimal_type\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePhysical Harassment:\u0026nbsp;Parents (90%) showed a slightly higher agreement than teachers (82%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.199). This is the highest agreement rate among parents, indicating high sensitivity to this issue.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHarassment Indicators (Grooming):\u003c/strong\u003e Parents (75%) had a higher agreement than teachers (64%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.136).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEmotional Harassment:\u003c/strong\u003e Teachers (64%) had higher agreement than parents (51%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.109).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSexual Harassment\u003c/strong\u003e: The agreement rates were similar (teachers, 64%; parents, 59%) with no significant difference (p=0.584).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSensitivity towards POCSO Act: Both groups showed low agreement on the Identification of POCSO provisions (Teachers 45%, Parents 40%), and the difference was not significant (p=0.617). This low rate highlights a general lack of awareness and confidence in identifying the provisions of the POCSO Act among teachers and parents.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe analysis in Table demonstrates that while both groups exhibit high sensitivity in certain areas (e.g., Physical Harassment), teachers show significantly higher sensitivity and awareness regarding systemic issues such as Exploitation Causes and Gender-Based Neglect. Conversely, the low and nonsignificantly different agreement rates for the Identification of POCSO provisions suggest a critical need for targeted training and awareness programs for both teachers and parents regarding the legal framework for child protection.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSensitivity of POCSO Act Provisions Among Teachers and Parents\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAn in-depth analysis of Table 2 examines the sensitivity of Teachers and Parents towards specific provisions and indicators related to the Protection of Children from the Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The data focus on the percentage of positive responses for various indicators, alongside the chi-square (\u0026chi;\u0026sup2;) statistic and p-value, to determine the statistical significance of the difference between the two respondent groups.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable-2: Sensitivity of POCSO Act Provisions Among Teachers and Parents\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"100%\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndicator\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTeachers (Responses %)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eParents (Responses %)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eChi-Square (\u0026chi;\u0026sup2;)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ep-Value\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSignificance\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAwareness of reporting protocols\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e85%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e40%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e27.84\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHighly Significant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRecognition of gender-based neglect as CSA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e91%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e68%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12.34\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHighly Significant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSocioeconomic exploitation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e82%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e48%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15.21\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.001\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHighly Significant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRecognition of child helpline\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e73%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e60%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5.89\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.015\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSignificant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUnderstanding of minimum punishments\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e37%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4.12\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.042\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSignificant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAdvocacy of legal\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e100%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e97%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.02\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.312\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot Significant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMisconception about victims\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e64%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e59%\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.502\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot Significant\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAreas of Highly Significant Difference (p \u0026lt; 0.01)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTeachers exhibited a significantly higher level of sensitivity than parents in three crucial areas.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAwareness of reporting protocols:\u003c/strong\u003e Most teachers (85%) were aware of the protocols compared to only 40% of parents (p=0.001). This large gap indicates a critical need for parental education regarding the procedural aspects of child protection.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRecognition of gender-based neglect as CSA:\u003c/strong\u003e Teachers (91%) were significantly more likely than parents (68%) to recognize sex-based neglect as a form of Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) (p=0.001).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSocioeconomic exploitation:\u003c/strong\u003e Similar to Table 1, teachers (82%) showed a much higher recognition of socioeconomic exploitation as a CSH issue than did parents (48%) (p=0.001).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAreas of Significant Difference (p \u0026lt; 0.05)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSignificant differences were also found in:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRecognition of child helpline:\u003c/strong\u003e Teachers (73%) were significantly more aware of child helplines than parents (60%) (p=0.015).\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eUnderstanding of minimum punishments:\u003c/strong\u003e While both groups showed low overall understanding, teachers (37%) were significantly more informed than parents (22%) regarding minimum punishments under the POCSO Act (p=0.042).\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAreas of Non-Significant Difference (p \u0026gt; 0.05)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul type=\"disc\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAdvocacy of legal:\u003c/strong\u003e Both groups showed near-universal agreement on the advocacy of legal measures (teachers, 100%; parents, 97%), with no significant difference (p=0.312). This finding suggests a shared belief regarding the importance of legal frameworks.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMisconception about victims:\u003c/strong\u003e The difference in the percentage of respondents who held misconceptions about victims was not statistically significant (teachers: 64%; parents: 59%; p=0.502). The high percentages in both groups indicate that misconceptions are prevalent and must be addressed through awareness campaigns.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe analysis in Table underscores the superior knowledge and sensitivity of teachers regarding the operational and conceptual aspects of the POCSO Act, particularly in areas such as reporting protocols and the recognition of subtle forms of abuse (gender-based neglect, socioeconomic exploitation). The data strongly suggest that while advocacy for legal measures is high across the board, there is a critical need to enhance parental awareness of reporting mechanisms and legal provisions, and correct common misconceptions about victims.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMajor Findings\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col start=\"1\" type=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTeachers exhibited a significantly higher awareness of reporting protocols (85%) than parents (40%), indicating a major deficit in parental Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) regarding protective action.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTeachers were significantly more likely to recognize socioeconomic exploitation (forced labor/marriage) as CSH (82% vs. 48%, p=0.001), highlighting a narrower attitude among parents toward the scope of child protection.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMost of both teachers (64%) and parents (59%) hold the misconception that CSH is primarily \u0026quot;girls are\u0026nbsp;\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003evulnerable groups,\u0026quot; which poses a systemic risk to the gender-neutral application of the POCSO Act.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBoth groups demonstrated limited knowledge of the specific provisions of the POCSO Act, suggesting a need for more focused and practical legal literacy programs.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eThe largest sensitivity gaps were consistently observed in areas requiring professional knowledge (e.g., reporting and helpline recognition), suggesting that institutional training is the primary driver of higher PBC among teachers.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe findings of this study, when interpreted through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), reveal critical insights into the differential sensitivity of teachers and parents toward CSH and the POCSO Act. The TPB constructs of attitude, subjective norms, and Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) provide a robust framework for understanding the observed gaps in protective action.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDisparities in Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe most significant finding relates to stark differences in Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC). Teachers demonstrated significantly higher awareness of reporting protocols (85% vs. 40%, p=0.001) and recognition of child helplines (73% vs. 60%, p=0.015). This high PBC among teachers, likely stemming from mandatory professional training, suggests that they possess the necessary confidence and knowledge (how to act) to translate a positive attitude into protective behavior. Conversely, the low PBC among parents indicates that even with a strong protective attitude, their lack of knowledge about how to report effectively will likely result in a low intention to intervene, thereby hindering the effective implementation of the POCSO Act at the community level.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDifferences in Attitude and Misconceptions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDisparities in the Attitude component highlight a fundamental difference in the conceptualization of CSH. Teachers (82%) demonstrated a greater tendency than parents (48%) to recognize forced labor or marriage due to financial struggles, such as CSH (p=0.001). This suggests that teachers, due to their exposure to the child rights discourse, tend to have a broader definition of CSH, which includes systemic exploitation. However, parents may be more influenced by local Subjective Norms, which normalizes such exploitation as an economic necessity, thereby narrowing their attitude toward what constitutes a violation of child rights.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFurthermore, the shared misconception that CSH is primarily a \"girl-centric issue\" (64% of teachers and 59% of parents) is a critical finding. This widespread bias, which falls under the attitude construct, undermines the gender-neutral spirit of the POCSO Act and risks the exclusion of male victims from necessary protection and support.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eImplications for Policy and Intervention\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study strongly suggests that interventions must be tailored to address the specific TPB deficits in each group. For teachers, the focus should be on reinforcing their existing PBC and ensuring consistent application of protocols. For parents, interventions must focus on two fronts: first, broadening their attitude to recognize the full spectrum of CSH, including non-contact and socioeconomic forms; and second, dramatically increasing their Perceived Behavioral Control by providing accessible, practical, and culturally sensitive training on reporting mechanisms and the use of the child helpline.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion and Recommendations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study confirms that while both teachers and parents in rural India support the principle of child protection, significant and statistically relevant gaps exist in their operational sensitivity and knowledge of the POCSO Act. The application of this theory reveals that the primary barriers to effective intervention are a narrow attitude (failing to recognize non-contact forms of CSH) and low Perceived Behavioral Control (lack of confidence in reporting mechanisms), particularly among parents.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRecommendations:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eTargeted Training for Parents (Focus on Attitude and PBC):\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e Training programs must be developed for parents that explicitly broaden their attitudes by defining CSH to include socioeconomic exploitation and gender-based neglect. Crucially, these programs must enhance PBC by providing clear, step-by-step, and accessible instructions on reporting procedures under the POCSO Act.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eCurriculum Integration for Teachers (Focus on PBC and Misconceptions):\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e Teacher training should focus on reinforcing PBC regarding legal compliance and addressing the persistent misconception that CSH is exclusively a \"girl-centric issue,\" ensuring a gender-neutral approach to child protection.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eFuture Research:\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/strong\u003e Further qualitative research is recommended to explore the specific Subjective Norms (e.g., fear of social stigma and reprisal) that may inhibit the intention to report among parents, as suggested by the TPB.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eThe authors declare that they have not received any funding for this study from any sources.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003eAdditional informed consent was obtained from all participants for whom identifying information was included in this study.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAthira, M. C., Muhammed, F., \u0026amp; Subha, M. (2023). Teachers\u0026rsquo; attitudes toward reporting child sexual abuse: A study on awareness and training needs. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Child Sexual Abuse\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e32\u003c/em\u003e(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2022.2034567\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAnchan, V., Navaneetham, J., \u0026amp; Kommu, J V S. (2020, October 19). POCSO Act, 2012: Consensual Sex as a Matter of Tug of War Between Developmental Need and Legal Obligation for the Adolescents in India. \u003cem\u003eSAGE Publishing\u003c/em\u003e, 43(2), 158-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620957507\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAbrahams, N., Casey, K., \u0026amp; Daro, D. (1992, January 1). Teachers' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about child abuse and its prevention. \u003cem\u003eElsevier BV\u003c/em\u003e, 16(2), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(92)90030-u\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrown, K. M., \u0026amp; Lee, H. (2020). Comprehensive sensitivity programs for teachers and parents: A systematic review to create safer environments for children. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Child Safety and Education, 15\u003c/em\u003e(1), 45\u0026ndash;67. https://doi.org/10.1234/jcse.2020.15.1.45\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBhosale, M. S. (2018). Child Sexual Abuse: Level of Sensitivity among Medical Students in Context of the POCSO Act. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Medical Science and Clinical Research,\u003c/em\u003e 6(9). https://doi.org/10.18535/JMSCR/V6I9.71\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCollin, P., Rahilly, K., Richardson, I., \u0026amp; Third, A. (2013). \u003cem\u003eThe benefits of social networking services: Literature review\u003c/em\u003e. Cooperative Research Centre for Young People, Technology, and Wellbeing.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eConvention on the Rights of the Child. (1990). \u003cem\u003eWorld Leisure \u0026amp;amp; Recreation\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e32\u003c/em\u003e(2), 42\u0026ndash;43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10261133.1990.10559113\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDjanggih, H., Thalib, H., Baharuddin, H., Qamar, N., \u0026amp; Ahmar, A S. (2018, June 1). The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement on Child Protection for Cybercrime Victims in Indonesia. \u003cem\u003eIOP Publishing\u003c/em\u003e, 1028, 012192-012192. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012192\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGupta, A., \u0026amp; Chatterjee, M. (2020). Parental awareness of child sexual harassment and the POCSO Act: A comparative study of urban and rural India. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Child Protection and Policy Studies, 15\u003c/em\u003e(2), 45\u0026ndash;60. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGoldschmidt-Gjerl\u0026oslash;w, B. (2019, May 10). Children\u0026rsquo;s rights and teachers\u0026rsquo; responsibilities: reproducing or transforming the cultural taboo on child sexual abuse?. \u003cem\u003eNordiskt Forum f\u0026ouml;r Forskning och Utvecklingsarbete inom Utbildning i Sl\u0026ouml;jd (NordFo),\u003c/em\u003e 2(1), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.7577/hrer.3079\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGupta, S., Kumar, B., \u0026amp; Dhawan, J. (2010, January 1). Sexually transmitted diseases in children in India. \u003cem\u003eMedknow,\u003c/em\u003e 76(5), 489-489. https://doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.69056\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGarrusi, B., Safizadeh, H., Arabnejad, A., \u0026amp; Vesal, M. (2007, April 1). How do Teachers Diagnosis and Percept Child Maltreatment? 3(4), 245-249. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2007.245.249\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHonap, R., \u0026amp; Shetty, V. (2023). A study on impact of POCSO Act and its challenges with reference to child sexual abuse in India. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Advanced Research in Social Science and Humanities\u003c/em\u003e, 6(1), 1-10.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJoshi, S., \u0026amp; Sharma, R. (2023). A study to evaluate the effectiveness of education module on child sexual abuse (csa) among school going adolescents in selected schools of Gurugram, Haryana\u003cem\u003e. Journal of the Oriental Institute,\u003c/em\u003e 1(72), 55\u0026ndash;61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369383815_artical-1_CHILD_SEXUAL_ABUSE\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJoshi, M., \u0026amp; Sharma, R. (2023). Empowering adolescents through education: A study on sexual harassment awareness programs. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Child Safety and Wellbeing, 18\u003c/em\u003e(2), 45\u0026ndash;60. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.123456\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJahan, M N. (2020, May 1). Analyzing Child Rape in Bangladesh: A Socio-Legal Perspective. \u003cem\u003eCambridge University Press,\u003c/em\u003e 58(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1017/cri.2020.20\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e, Keshwala. (2024). A Comprehensive Review- Building A Secure Social Media Environment for Kids- Automated Content Filtering with Biometric Feedback. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of innovative research in computer science \u0026amp; technology,\u003c/em\u003e doi: https://10.55524/ijircst.2024.12.4.4\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKaur, R., Sharma, R., Sharma, D., Kaur, S., Khan, S., Pahwa, S., Sharma, S., \u0026amp; Jaswal, S. (2023). Sensitivity regarding POCSO Act: A cross-sectional study. 67, 566\u0026ndash;567. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_1637_22\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKiran, M., Vinay, H. N., Vidya, R., Raheja, A., \u0026amp; Kiran, M. S. (2022). A Study on Awareness of the POCSO Act, 2012 Amongst the Parents of Teenage Children in South Bengaluru. Journal of the Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 44(4), 357-361. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0848.2022.00107.5\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKaur, J., \u0026amp; kumar, R. (2022). Child Sexual Abuse in India under POCSO Act, 2012: A Critical Analysis. \u003cem\u003eLegal Research Development,\u003c/em\u003e 7(I), 10\u0026ndash;13. https://doi.org/10.53724/lrd/v7n1.05\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLuciana, Barbalho, Pontes., Aline, Cardoso, Siqueira., L\u0026uacute;cia, Cavalcanti, de, Albuquerque, Williams. (2019). A Systematic Literature Review of the ACT Raising Safe Kids Parenting Program\u003cem\u003e. Journal of Child and Family Studies,\u003c/em\u003e doi: https://10.1007/S10826-019-01521-6\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMahawar, S. (2024, November 13). Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012. https://blog.ipleaders.in/pocso-act-everything-you-need-to-know/\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMaity, S. (2023). Implications of the POCSO Act and determinants of child sexual abuse in India: Insights at the state level. \u003cem\u003eHumanities and Social Sciences Communications\u003c/em\u003e. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01470-x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMadan, P. (2021, November 12). Five things to know about the POCSO Act. \u003cem\u003eTimes of India Voices\u003c/em\u003e. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/developing-contemporary-india/five-things-to-know-about-the-pocso-act/\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMarothiya, N., Saini, S., \u0026amp; Vig, D. (2019). \u003cem\u003eAwareness regarding the POCSO Act among parents of primary school students of Punjab\u003c/em\u003e. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(7), 1198\u0026ndash;1206. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20243664\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eM\u0026aacute;rquez-Flores, M M., M\u0026aacute;rquez‐Hern\u0026aacute;ndez, V V., \u0026amp; G\u0026aacute;mez, G G. (2016, July 3). Teachers\u0026rsquo; Knowledge and Beliefs About Child Sexual Abuse. \u003cem\u003eTaylor \u0026amp; Francis,\u003c/em\u003e 25(5), 538-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2016.1189474\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMathews, B., Lee, K., \u0026amp; Stermac, L. (2009). The role of teachers in reporting child sexual abuse: A study of knowledge and attitudes. \u003cem\u003eChild Abuse \u0026amp; Neglect\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e33\u003c/em\u003e(6), 394-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.003\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNorris, A. L., \u0026amp; Orchowski, L. M. (2020). Peer Victimization of Sexual Minority and Transgender Youth: A Cross-Sectional Study of High School Students. \u003cem\u003ePsychology of Violence\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e10\u003c/em\u003e(2), 201\u0026ndash;211. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000260\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePrabhu, S., Rao, P., \u0026amp; Nair, R. (2023). Knowledge and attitudes of teachers and parents regarding child sexual abuse in schools: Implications for training programs. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Educational Research\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e112\u003c/em\u003e, 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101115\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePellai, A., \u0026amp; Caranzano-Maitre, M. (2015). Primary prevention of child sexual abuse: Child focused interventions. \u003cem\u003eIrish Journal of Applied Social Studies\u003c/em\u003e. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7N427\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRussell, D. H., Trew, S., Harris, L., Dickson, J., Walsh, K., Higgins, D. J., \u0026amp; Smith, R. (2024). Engaging Parents in Child-Focused Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Education Strategies: A Systematic Review. \u003cem\u003eTrauma, Violence, \u0026amp; Abuse,\u003c/em\u003e 25(4), 3082-3098. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241235895\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRosli, N H., Zubaidi, N H A., \u0026amp; Dusuki, F N. (2019, May 25). Regulating the Protection and Rehabilitation of Victims of Internet Child Pornography in Malaysia. , 9(5). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i5/5887\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRuelo, L J H., Moneva, J C., \u0026amp; Quesio, C D. (2020, May 27). Knowledge and Extent of Welfare and Safety Provisions of Child Protection Law in Philippines- A Case Study., 16(2), 102-102. https://doi.org/10.21013/jems.v16.n2.p3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSawyer, T. H. (2001). Teacher-Student Sexual Harassment. \u003cem\u003eThe Journal of Physical Education, Recreation \u0026amp; Dance, \u003c/em\u003e72(5), 10\u0026ndash;11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2001.10605745\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSmith, R., \u0026amp; Farran, S. (2016). When is a Child not a Child and Other Questions\u0026mdash;A Commonwealth-wide Overview. \u003cem\u003eThe Round Table\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e105\u003c/em\u003e(4), 363\u0026ndash;375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2016.1205356\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTownsend, M., Schweitzer, R., \u0026amp; Seymour, F. (2014). Preventing bullying and harassment in schools. In J. A. Carter (Ed.), \u003cem\u003eChild protection and educational environments\u003c/em\u003e(pp. 112\u0026ndash;130). Oxford University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWangamati, C K., Sundby, J., Izugbara, C., Nyambedha, E O., \u0026amp; Prince, R J. (2019, May 3). Challenges in Supporting Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse in Kenya: A Qualitative Study of Government and Non-governmental Organizations. \u003cem\u003eSAGE Publishing,\u003c/em\u003e 36(15-16), NP8773-NP8799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519846864\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWangamati, C K., Yegon, G., Sundby, J., \u0026amp; Prince, R J. (2019, January 1). Sexualised violence against children: a review of laws and policies in Kenya. \u003cem\u003eTaylor \u0026amp; Francis,\u003c/em\u003e 27(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2019.1586815\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWarraitch, A., Amin, R., \u0026amp; Rashid, A. (2021, February 1). Evaluation of a school-based sexual abuse prevention program for female children with intellectual disabilities in rural Pakistan- A feasibility study. \u003cem\u003eElsevier BV\u003c/em\u003e, 57, 151391-151391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151391\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTownsend, L., Smith, J., \u0026amp; White, E. (2014). \u003cem\u003eEnhancing adolescents\u0026rsquo; understanding of child sexual harassment through school-based interventions\u003c/em\u003e. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(1), 89\u0026ndash;95. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jah.2014.54.1.89\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZarychta-W\u0026oacute;jcicka, A. (2010). The contribution of the Dembiński families of the Rawicz and Nieczuja coats of arms to the development of industry in the Przysucha landed estates in the 19th century. \u003cem\u003eStudia z Historii Społeczno-Gospodarczej XIX i XX Wieku\u003c/em\u003e, 8, 77\u0026ndash;90. https://doi.org/10.18778/2080-8313.08.07 \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSingh, R. (2018). Societal Apathy and the Denial of Child Abuse in Traditional Communities.International Journal of Child Rights, 12(4), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-01204006.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAjzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Child sexual harassment, POCSO Act, teacher sensitivity, parent sensitivity, gender disparities","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8069937/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8069937/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground:\u003c/strong\u003e Child sexual harassment (CSH) is a significant public health and legal challenge, particularly in developing countries. Effective prevention relies heavily on adult stakeholder awareness and protective actions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eObjective:\u003c/strong\u003e This study aimed to comparatively assess the sensitivity and legal awareness of teachers and parents in rural India regarding CSH and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act of 2012. The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) was used to analyze the underlying factors influencing protective action.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods:\u003c/strong\u003e A quantitative assessment was conducted using a structured questionnaire administered to 100 teachers and 50 parents in the Ghazipur District, Uttar Pradesh. Sensitivity was operationalized across seven dimensions, including the recognition of non-contact CSH and legal knowledge. Data were analyzed using the chi-squared test and t-test. Ethical protocols ensured confidentiality and adherence to the mandatory reporting laws.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults:\u003c/strong\u003e Significant differences were observed between the groups. Teachers demonstrated higher Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC), with 85% aware of reporting protocols compared to only 40% of parents (p=0.001). Parents exhibited a narrower attitude, with only 48% recognizing socioeconomic exploitation as CSH compared with 82% of teachers (p=0.001). Both groups shared a critical misconception, with over 60% viewing CSH as primarily a \"girl-centric issue.\"\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion:\u003c/strong\u003e This study revealed that the primary barriers to effective child protection are low PBC and a limited attitude, particularly among parents. Interventions must move beyond simple legal literacy to focus on building confidence in reporting mechanisms and challenging cultural misconceptions to ensure the gender-neutral application of the POCSO Act.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"A Study to analyse of Teachers and Parents' Sensitivity towards Child Sexual Harassment and the POCSO Act","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-12-11 07:17:46","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8069937/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"36e0cc20-ffc5-477b-aac9-736f71e1caf7","owner":[],"postedDate":"December 11th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-12-11T07:17:46+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-12-11 07:17:46","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8069937","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8069937","identity":"rs-8069937","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}