UK Reproducibility Network: Open and Transparent Research Practices Survey

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Openness and transparency in the research process are a prerequisite to the production of high quality research outputs. Efforts to maximise these features have substantially accelerated in recent years, placing open and transparent research practices at the forefront of funding and related priorities, and encouraging investment in resources and infrastructure to enable such practices. Despite these efforts, there has been no systematic documentation of current practices, infrastructure, or training and resources that support open and transparent research in the UK. To address this gap, we developed and conducted the Open and Transparent Research Practices survey, a large-scale audit study completed by research-active staff in UK research institutions to better understand existing practices, needs, support, and barriers faced when implementing open and transparent research. The data presented here capture responses from over 2,500 research-active staff based at 15 institutions affiliated with the UK Reproducibility Network. The data provide a snapshot of open research practices that can be used to identify barriers, training needs, and areas that require greater investments.
Full text 14,066 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
UK Reproducibility Network: Open and Transparent Research Practices Survey | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Data Note UK Reproducibility Network: Open and Transparent Research Practices Survey Lukas Hughes-Noehrer, Noémie Aubert Bonn, Marcello de Maria, Thomas Rhys Evans, and 7 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4143966/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 22 Aug, 2024 Read the published version in Scientific Data → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Openness and transparency in the research process are a prerequisite to the production of high quality research outputs. Efforts to maximise these features have substantially accelerated in recent years, placing open and transparent research practices at the forefront of funding and related priorities, and encouraging investment in resources and infrastructure to enable such practices. Despite these efforts, there has been no systematic documentation of current practices, infrastructure, or training and resources that support open and transparent research in the UK. To address this gap, we developed and conducted the Open and Transparent Research Practices survey, a large-scale audit study completed by research-active staff in UK research institutions to better understand existing practices, needs, support, and barriers faced when implementing open and transparent research. The data presented here capture responses from over 2,500 research-active staff based at 15 institutions affiliated with the UK Reproducibility Network. The data provide a snapshot of open research practices that can be used to identify barriers, training needs, and areas that require greater investments. Library Science Information Retrieval and Management Scientific Communication Open Research Open Science Reproducibility Research Training United Kingdom Research Integrity Research Assessment Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 22 Aug, 2024 Read the published version in Scientific Data → Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4143966","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Data Note","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":282310557,"identity":"7e5ccf18-0727-43eb-9259-0c0e3f05dd44","order_by":0,"name":"Lukas Hughes-Noehrer","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9167-0397","institution":"University of Manchester","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lukas","middleName":"","lastName":"Hughes-Noehrer","suffix":""},{"id":282310698,"identity":"af2a85bf-9afb-4147-b7ea-f14256c2f9a7","order_by":1,"name":"Noémie Aubert Bonn","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Manchester","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Noémie","middleName":"Aubert","lastName":"Bonn","suffix":""},{"id":282314022,"identity":"dc355e65-4bb2-4f8b-a3e6-0b77e2b27872","order_by":2,"name":"Marcello de Maria","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Reading","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Marcello","middleName":"","lastName":"de Maria","suffix":""},{"id":282314023,"identity":"8ce2470b-8f19-4c97-bc77-563b84607a79","order_by":3,"name":"Thomas Rhys Evans","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Greenwich","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Thomas","middleName":"Rhys","lastName":"Evans","suffix":""},{"id":282314024,"identity":"968b0346-c79b-4626-8682-ecc3be5af131","order_by":4,"name":"Emily K. Farran","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Surrey","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Emily","middleName":"K.","lastName":"Farran","suffix":""},{"id":282314025,"identity":"756f325c-464a-4081-a365-f76c8648ac4c","order_by":5,"name":"Laura Fortunato","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Oxford","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Laura","middleName":"","lastName":"Fortunato","suffix":""},{"id":282314026,"identity":"e0748ccf-8145-4af3-8f60-1b1210f234f9","order_by":6,"name":"Emma L. Henderson","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Surrey","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Emma","middleName":"L.","lastName":"Henderson","suffix":""},{"id":282314027,"identity":"f4c8b55e-0f97-4439-ad80-9c9c4c3ae33c","order_by":7,"name":"Neil Jacobs","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Bristol","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Neil","middleName":"","lastName":"Jacobs","suffix":""},{"id":282314028,"identity":"4af83022-fc0c-4a0e-b7db-d6f97d27df71","order_by":8,"name":"Marcus R. Munafò","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Bristol","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Marcus","middleName":"R.","lastName":"Munafò","suffix":""},{"id":282314029,"identity":"eebea80b-7a25-4982-88cd-fbd65ddfc994","order_by":9,"name":"Suzanne L. K. Stewart","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Chester","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Suzanne","middleName":"L. K.","lastName":"Stewart","suffix":""},{"id":282314030,"identity":"1de5f741-8a59-4fcf-b541-ebc78f09c0f1","order_by":10,"name":"Andrew J. Stewart","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Manchester","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Andrew","middleName":"J.","lastName":"Stewart","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-03-21 13:44:03","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"coiExplicitlySet":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4143966/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4143966/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03786-z","type":"published","date":"2024-08-23T00:00:00+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":63281208,"identity":"682f6c6e-1c14-4162-a290-1c2d96d5b405","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-26 12:55:28","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":272698,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ukrnotrpsddatadescriptorpre.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4143966/v1_covered_6e356954-a313-43bc-bc54-ec04b69aecc9.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eUK Reproducibility Network: Open and Transparent Research Practices Survey\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[{"identity":"10fcdc7b-c146-4ac9-9de1-c47a279cf933","identifier":"10.13039/501100013589","name":"Research England","awardNumber":"REDF","order_by":0}],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"University of Manchester","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Open Research, Open Science, Reproducibility, Research Training, United Kingdom, Research Integrity, Research Assessment","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4143966/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4143966/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eOpenness and transparency in the research process are a prerequisite to the production of high quality research outputs. Efforts to maximise these features have substantially accelerated in recent years, placing open and transparent research practices at the forefront of funding and related priorities, and encouraging investment in resources and infrastructure to enable such practices. Despite these efforts, there has been no systematic documentation of current practices, infrastructure, or training and resources that support open and transparent research in the UK. To address this gap, we developed and conducted the Open and Transparent Research Practices survey, a large-scale audit study completed by research-active staff in UK research institutions to better understand existing practices, needs, support, and barriers faced when implementing open and transparent research. The data presented here capture responses from over 2,500 research-active staff based at 15 institutions affiliated with the UK Reproducibility Network. The data provide a snapshot of open research practices that can be used to identify barriers, training needs, and areas that require greater investments.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"UK Reproducibility Network: Open and Transparent Research Practices Survey","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-03-22 13:13:13","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4143966/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"31b3d09d-640f-4523-9a36-f62939499861","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 22nd, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":29724605,"name":"Library Science"},{"id":29724606,"name":"Information Retrieval and Management"},{"id":29724607,"name":"Scientific Communication"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-08-26T12:55:24+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4143966","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03786-z","journal":{"identity":"scientific-data","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Scientific Data"},"publishedOn":"2024-08-23 00:00:00","publishedOnDateReadable":"August 23rd, 2024"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-03-22 13:13:13","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41597-024-03786-z","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03786-z","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4143966","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4143966","identity":"rs-4143966","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"7rjqhiLT3MXkJMwkYKINL","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-20T11:00:21.680559+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0