Between Compassion and Controversy: Providers and Patients Navigating the Post-Abortion Care Labyrinth in Nongr-Massom Health District, Burkina Faso

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This qualitative study in Burkina Faso explored healthcare providers' and clients' experiences with post-abortion care, finding mixed client experiences from poor reception to compassionate care despite providers describing structured, protocol-driven service delivery.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

This qualitative paper examines how health care providers and patients in the Nongr-Massom Health District in Burkina Faso navigate barriers and tensions in accessing post-abortion care after induced abortion. Using interviews or similar qualitative data collection, it describes interactions that balance “compassion” with “controversy,” including how stigma and competing expectations affect care-seeking and delivery. A key limitation is that the findings reflect a specific district context and do not aim to generalize broadly beyond the study setting. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Unsafe abortion remains a major contributor to maternal mortality, particularly in low-resource settings. In Burkina Faso, post-abortion care (PAC) was integrated into national health policy between 1997 and 1998, yet service uptake remains low. This qualitative study explores perceptions of PAC quality among healthcare providers and clients in the Nongr-Massom health district. We conducted 21 in-depth interviews—11 with providers and 10 with PAC recipients—and analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis. Most clients were aged 20–29, with half lacking formal education; providers were aged 40–49 and held higher education credentials. Providers described PAC delivery as structured and protocol-driven but acknowledged systemic limitations and the need for improvement. Clients reported mixed experiences, ranging from poor reception and confidentiality concerns to compassionate care and emotional support. Although some initially expressed dissatisfaction, many later emphasized provider empathy and encouragement during treatment. Findings reveal persistent barriers to high-quality PAC despite governmental efforts. While providers recognize their critical role, gaps in service delivery and client trust remain. Addressing these challenges is essential to improving maternal health outcomes and reducing unintended pregnancies.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0