Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This study developed a machine learning model to systematically rank genes for newborn screening based on 25 characteristics, identifying the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel and evidence of natural history and treatment efficacy as key predictors of gene inclusion.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Structured Abstract Purpose Over 30 international studies are exploring newborn sequencing (NBSeq) to expand the range of genetic disorders included in newborn screening. Substantial variability in gene selection across programs exists, highlighting the need for a systematic approach to prioritize genes. Methods We assembled a dataset comprising 25 characteristics about each of the 4,390 genes included in 27 NBSeq programs. We used regression analysis to identify several predictors of inclusion, and developed a machine learning model to rank genes for public health consideration. Results Among 27 NBSeq programs, the number of genes analyzed ranged from 134 to 4,299, with only 74 (1.7%) genes included by over 80% of programs. The most significant associations with gene inclusion across programs were presence on the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (inclusion increase of 74.7%, CI: 71.0%-78.4%), robust evidence on the natural history (29.5%, CI: 24.6%-34.4%) and treatment efficacy (17.0%, CI: 12.3%- 21.7%) of the associated genetic disease. A boosted trees machine learning model using 13 predictors achieved high accuracy in predicting gene inclusion across programs (AUC = 0.915, R² = 84%). Conclusion The machine learning model developed here provides a ranked list of genes that can adapt to emerging evidence and regional needs, enabling more consistent and informed gene selection in NBSeq initiatives.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-17T06:50:26.839124+00:00