The Dynamic Impacts of Informal Settlement Land Regularization on Community Transformation and Land Governance in Peri-Urban Tanzania: Evidence from eight settlements in Mbarali District

The Dynamic Impacts of Informal Settlement Land Regularization on Community Transformation and Land Governance in Peri-Urban Tanzania: Evidence from eight settlements in Mbarali District | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article The Dynamic Impacts of Informal Settlement Land Regularization on Community Transformation and Land Governance in Peri-Urban Tanzania: Evidence from eight settlements in Mbarali District Mussa Muhoja This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6939498/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract As urban expansion accelerates across sub-Saharan Africa, informal settlements have become both a challenge and a focus for land governance reform. In Tanzania, land regularization initiatives have been promoted as a pathway towards improved governance, and community development. Yet, the social, political, economic, cultural, and environmental consequences of these reforms remain underexplored particularly from the perspectives of grassroots communities experiencing these changes. This study adopts a broader and more grounded lens to examine the multifaceted impacts of land regularization in eight peri-urban areas. The study investigates how land regularization processes reshapes community life beyond formal tenure security. The study draws from in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, participant observation, and document analysis. The study demonstrates that land regularization in peri-urban Tanzania functions as transformative socio-political process with deep ramifications for community identity, participation, and equity. The study argue that, land governance is a deeply political and cultural process that affects power dynamics, identity, and collective well-being. The study recommends for a rethinking of land governance frameworks to integrate social and cultural dimensions more explicitly. Therefore, policymakers and practitioners must move beyond legalism and adopt a more inclusive, context-sensitive approach that accounts for the lived realities of communities on the urbanizing frontier. Informal settlement land regularization community transformation land governance peri-urban Tanzania Figures Figure 1 Introduction In recent years, the governance of land in rapidly urbanizing regions of the Global South has come under increased scrutiny, particularly as informal settlements proliferate along urban peripheries (Magina et al., 2020 ; Nuhu, 2019 ; Nuhu et al., 2023a ). These informal spaces, often unplanned and lacking legal recognition, have become the dominant form of settlement growth in African cities (Nuhu et al., 2023b ). The 1995 Urban and Housing Indicators Programme indicated that 70% of Tanzania's population lived in informal settlements, a figure that has since risen sharply to 80% according to recent studies (Magina et al., 2020 ). Between 40% and 80% of built-up areas in Tanzania are classified as informal, with most urban households residing in such settlements (Zhang et al., 2020 ). This trend has been particularly evident in peri-urban areas, where rural land transitions to urban uses with minimal regulation, often resulting in overlapping claims, haphazard development, and contested land rights (Kironde, 2019 ; Stein et al., 2024 ). In Tanzania, like many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, the expansion of informal settlements reflects deeper issues of rural-to-urban migration, poverty, unequal access to formal land markets, and the failure of statutory planning systems to respond effectively to local needs (Kironde, 2019 ; Stein et al., 2024 ). In response, various governments and development agencies have turned to land regularization as a policy instrument to address these challenges, seeking to formalize informal settlements by granting secure tenure, producing planning layouts, and integrating marginalized communities into the formal land management framework (Andreasen et al., 2020a ; Makota, 2018a ). While the approach is often celebrated for its potential to deliver legal titles and stimulate investment, its deeper impacts on social relations, community empowerment, and spatial awareness are less understood particularly in peri-urban African contexts where hybrid forms of land governance prevail (Chimhowu, 2019 ; Lund, 2017 ). Scholars have warned that if not carefully designed, regularization may reinforce existing inequalities or fail to meaningfully engage the communities it aims to benefit (Borras Jr & Franco, 2010 ; Ubink, 2018 ). As such, there is growing recognition that successful land regularization must transcend legal formalization and engage with the lived realities, knowledge systems, and aspirations of the people (Chigbu, 2021 ; Chigbu et al., 2017 ). Despite the growing enthusiasm for informal settlement land regularization as a tool for improved land governance, the evidence base remains limited regarding its social, cultural, and environmental consequences at the grassroots level. Much of the literature has focused on the legal and administrative dimensions of regularization such as titling procedures, mapping technologies, and institutional frameworks without fully exploring how these processes reshape community behavior, social relations, and civic engagement (Chimhowu, 2019 ; Payne, 2001 ). Yet, as recent scholarship underlines, land governance is not merely a technical or legal exercise but a deeply political and cultural process that involves contestation, negotiation, and transformation (Lund, 2017 ). This study aims to fill that gap by taking a holistic lens on informal settlement land regularization in peri-urban Tanzania. It asks; how does a land regularization program affect multiple dimensions of community life. This study investigates eight peri-urban settlements in Mbarali District namely Madibira, Ubaruku, Rujewa, Lugelele, Mapogoro, Igurusi, and Kongolo Mswiswi that have undergone land regularization since 2019. It moves beyond single-focus analysis to adopt a multi-dimensional analysis, embracing a broader understanding of impact. This approach is guided by recent calls to view land regularization not only as a legal process but also as a form of socio-political transformation (Magina et al., 2020 ; Wankogere & Alananga, 2020 ). The study looks on post-implementation impacts of what happened after maps were drawn, certificates issued, and land claims formalized. The stud further asks questions such as; did people invest more in homes? Did women gain ownership? Did communities protect public and natural assets? Did everyday participation and psychological well-being improve? Who was left behind? Studies such as those of Andreasen et al., ( 2020b ); and Magina et al., ( 2020 ), began to explore livelihood impacts and participatory practices, but often stopped short of analyzing social cohesion, psychological effects, ecological awareness, and gender inclusion in a unified framework. Moreover, emerging evidence from Mbilinyi et al., ( 2022 ) flags ongoing challenges on bureaucracy, cost barriers, and land conflicts but again focuses narrowly on procedural constraints rather than broader social consequences. By embedding this study within the broader literature, it tests whether claims of inclusion and empowerment can be realized in practice, in environments that are more contested, less resourced, and more vulnerable. Conceptual Framework This study applied the Transformative Land Governance Framework (TLGF) to understand informal settlement land regularization in peri-urban Mbarali not simply as a legal or technical intervention, but as a deeply transformative process that reshapes social relations, power dynamics, and community identities. Central to this framework is the idea that land governance should actively correct historical injustices and empower marginalized groups, making land rights a tool for broader social change rather than just formal ownership (Borras Jr & Franco, 2010 ). The transformative nature of this framework lies in its five core pillars, which guided the study’s analysis. First, it emphasized that tenure security must lead to empowerment, meaning that formal land documents should enable community members to invest confidently and participate fully in decision-making, going beyond mere legal recognition (Durand-Lasserve & Royston, 2002 ). Second, the framework’s focus on inclusive participation ensured that the study examined not only who received land titles but how diverse groups, including women and youth, engaged meaningfully in planning and spatial decision-making, recognizing that real transformation requires widespread community involvement (Palmer et al., 2009 a). Third, the framework’s pillar of equity and gender justice helped surface persistent inequalities in land access and control, highlighting that transformative governance must challenge entrenched norms and power structures rather than reinforce them (Daley & Englert, 2010a ). Fourth, spatial justice reminded the study to look beyond individual ownership to the protection of commons and public spaces, recognizing that transformation involves defending collective interests against elite capture and informal privatization (Kombe & Kreibich, 2006 ). Finally, the framework emphasized that transformation includes social and psychological shifts focusing on how communities see themselves, their relationship with the state, and their visions for the future (S. J. Borras & Franco, 2010 ). This helped frame the analysis of changes in civic identity and intergenerational engagement in Mbarali. By using the TLGF, the study was able to explore informal settlement land regularization as a catalyst for social justice, empowerment, and inclusive development, revealing both its potential and its challenges. This approach echoes similar transformative analyses in African and global contexts, underscoring the critical role of land governance in driving equitable social change (Amanor, 2012 ; Borras Jr & Franco, 2010 ). Methodology This study adopted a qualitative research approach to explore the complex and lived realities of how informal settlement land regularization contributes to community transformation in the peri-urban areas of Mbarali District. A qualitative design was most appropriate because it allowed the researcher to deeply engage with local voices, community narratives, and social meanings that cannot be captured through numerical data (Denzin & Lincoln, 2011 ). Given that, the focus of the study was to understand how communities experience land regularization in practice, how it shapes identity, power relations, access to land, and spatial justice, and a qualitative methodology provided the flexibility to capture diverse and context-specific experiences (Denzin & Lincoln, 2011 ). To identify participants, the study employed a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. Purposive sampling was used to intentionally select individuals with direct knowledge or experience related to the regularization project in eight selected peri-urban areas of Mbarali district where the project was executed from 2019–2024. These included local government officials, community leaders, members of land regularization committees, women leaders, youth representatives, and community members who had received certificates of right of occupancy (CROs). This method ensured that the data reflected perspectives from those who were most directly affected by or involved in the regularization process (Palinkas et al., 2015). Snowball sampling was then used to reach additional informants who experienced either transformative impacts or social and economic changes after the implementation of the informal settlement land regularization project in Mbarali district. Through recommendations from initial participants, the researcher was able to identify hard-to-reach voices and marginalized groups, which added depth and inclusiveness to the data. The study used four key data collection methods: observations, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and document analysis. Observation was used to physically visit and closely examine the communities in order to directly see the real changes and improvements that took place after land regularization (Dodgson, 2017 ). In-depth interviews were held with community leaders, local government officials, regularization committee members, and community members to gather individual reflections on the benefits, tensions, and socio-spatial impacts of regularization. These interviews provided rich, personal narratives and historical context. Focus group discussions were conducted with specific groups such as VICOBA members, women’s groups, and bodaboda associations to capture collective perspectives and identify shared challenges or successes (Kitzinger, 1995 ). Lastly, document analysis was used to examine relevant land policy documents, project annual reports, town planning maps and approved survey plans of the studies areas, and minutes from community and planning meetings. This secondary data helped validate field findings and provided institutional context for how land governance has evolved in the study area (Kamoleka & Lucian, 2024 ). The data collected in this study were analyzed using thematic analysis, a method well suited for identifying, organizing, and interpreting patterns within qualitative data. The process began with the transcription of interviews, focus group discussions, and field notes from observations, followed by multiple readings to gain familiarity with the data. Coding was then applied to categorize segments of the text according to emerging and pre-identified themes. NVivo 12 software was used to assist in managing and organizing the large volume of textual data, making it easier to cluster codes into broader themes. These themes were then interpreted in light of the study’s conceptual framework (Transformative Land Governance) allowing the analysis to link empirical findings with theoretical constructs and to understand how community transformation unfolded across the eight peri-urban settlements under the study. Triangulation across interviews, FGDs, observations, and document reviews enhanced the reliability of the analysis and ensured that the interpretations were grounded in multiple forms of evidence. This study followed ethical research standards to ensure respect, confidentiality, and voluntary participation. Informed consent was obtained from all participants after explaining the purpose of the study, their rights, and how their information would be used. Sensitive issues, especially those involving land ownership and community tensions, were handled with care to avoid escalating conflicts or causing harm (Bryman, 2016 ). Identities of participants were kept anonymous, and data was securely stored to protect privacy throughout the research process. Findings: Evidence from eight Peri urban areas of Mbarali district Study location Mbarali District, the focus area of the project under the study, is one of the most rapidly urbanizing parts of Mbeya Region. Spanning 14,438 square kilometers, the district has experienced significant population growth from 300,517 in 2012 to 446,336 in 2023 (URT, 2012; 2023). This population surge has fueled the expansion of both existing settlements and new urban centers. Formerly rural areas like Rujewa, Igawa, Igurusi, Ubaruku, and Madibira have transformed into bustling townships. For example, Ubaruku Ward became the district’s most densely populated area in 2022, with a population density of 738.6 people per square kilometer (URT, 2023). Urban growth in Mbarali is closely tied to its strategic location and strong agricultural economy. Located within the fertile Usangu plains, the district has become a hub for large-scale rice farming, including irrigation schemes such as the well-known Kapunga and Highland projects. These developments attract not only farmers but also traders and service providers. In addition, the district benefits from being situated along the TANZAM highway, a major transportation corridor that enhances trade and mobility, further encouraging settlement growth along its route (Mbarali District Report, 2024). This rapid and dynamic urbanization, while promising, has also brought challenges especially the proliferation of informal settlements lacking adequate infrastructure and secure land tenure. It is within this context, and following the call from communities in the study areas, that the regularization efforts were carried out, aimed at bringing order, security, and opportunity to thousands of landowners across the eight townships of Madibira, Utengule, Ubaruku, Rujewa, Lugelele, Mapogoro, Igurusi, and Kongolo Mswiswi. Project background The regularization of informal settlements in Mbarali District, located in Mbeya Region in southern Tanzania, emerged directly from the needs and voices of the local communities. In 2019, Ardhi University, an institution specializing in land and related matters launched a capacity-building program in the area. The focus of the initiative was to empower rice-farming communities (rice being the district’s main economic activity) to convert rice husks into clean energy. However, during the sessions, a different need began to surface. Community members expressed a strong interest in securing legal land ownership. They were keen to obtain land titles that would enable them to access bank loans, invest further in agriculture, and reduce tensions related to land use and ownership. As this demand grew louder, people in the area began organizing meetings and appealed to Ardhi University to help them formalize their land rights (ARU, Annual Mbarali Regularization Report, 2024). Recognizing that land regularization falls under the jurisdiction of local planning authorities as outlined in Tanzania’s Urban Planning Act of 2007; Ardhi University advised the communities to engage with the Mbarali District Council. Eventually, community members from eight areas of Madibira, Ubaruku, Rujewa, Lugelele, Mapogoro, Igurusi, and Kongolo Mswiswi reached an agreement with the District Council and formally invited Ardhi University to carry out the regularization work. Community members contributed funds to support the initiative. With these contributions, landowners had their plots identified, planned, and surveyed, and many ultimately received formal land titles. In 2022, the Tanzanian government, through the Ministry for Lands, Housing, and Human Settlements Development (MLHHSD), stepped in to support the ongoing work. It provided a loan to the project under the “Planning, Surveying, and Titling Program” (locally known as Kupanga, Kupima na Kumilikisha – KKK ). This financial support was intended to be repaid through contributions from landowners. Through this phase of the project, a total of 30,700 plots were successfully identified, planned, and surveyed. Building on this progress, the World Bank, in partnership with the Ministry, launched another project in 2025 namely the Land Tenure Improvement Plan (LTIP). The LTIP aimed to assist landowners who had been left out during the previous phases, ensuring their land was also surveyed and titled. The current study focuses specifically on respondents who were covered during the first two phases of the project, before the implementation of LTIP. Improved perceptions of land ownership One of the most immediate and tangible changes brought about by the land regularization project in Mbarali’s peri-urban settlements was a profound sense of security and confidence in land ownership. Across all eight study sites of Madibira, Ubaruku, Rujewa, Lugelele, Mapogoro, Igurusi, and Kongolo Mswiswi, community members described how the process of being formally recognized as landowners had shifted both their mindset and their actions. For many, this was the first time they felt that the land they occupied has been truly recognised and recorded. In Igurusi, for example, several households (whose their sons are working in Dar es Salaam) had begun upgrading their shelters from mud-and-thatch to brick and cement structures. A middle-aged man proudly showed the research team the foundation for a new three-room house that his son who is working in Dar es Salaam was building. The psychological shift was also visible in how people spoke about planning for the future. In Rujewa, two young couples expressed aspirations to build rental rooms and establish home gardens, now that their land status had been clarified. One young father explained in an interview that the land (certificate of occupancy) was now regarded as a bank as this made them to focus on long term investments that may be supported by bank loan using the certificates. Despite the overwhelmingly positive reception, not all experiences were seamless. Some community members in Ubaruku and Lugelele voiced frustration over delays in receiving their physical certificates, noting that the process between verification, mapping, surveying and final issuance sometimes felt too long. Nevertheless, even without holding the document in hand, many participants said they already felt a shift in how they were treated by neighbors and local leaders, with land disputes becoming fewer and easier to resolve. Therefore, the regularization process did more than distribute land titles but also transformed the way people perceived their land, their rights, and their future. It reduced fear, encouraged investment, and sparked a new sense of belonging. As one respondent in Madibira summed it up: When the government came to our village with this project, it was like they told us; we see you, we recognize you. That changes everything. Reduction in land conflicts and disputes One of the most widely acknowledged impacts of the land regularization project was the noticeable reduction in land conflicts, particularly disputes related to boundaries and inheritance. Across all eight peri-urban areas of Madibira, Utengule, Ubaruku, Rujewa, Lugelele, Mapogoro, Igurusi, and Kongolo Mswiswi, community members consistently reported that tensions over land had significantly diminished after plots were demarcated, mapped, and legally documented. They further explained that, before regularization, unclear boundaries and verbal agreements had fueled frequent disagreements, especially between neighbors and within extended families. In Rujewa, one elderly man explained that in the past, they used sticks or trees to show where their land ended. Then someone would cut the tree, and initiate the fighting. That the presence of beacons made everyone to knows his/her place. This clarity brought not only legal security but also emotional relief. Respondents spoke of being able to walk around their plots without anxiety or the constant need to defend their claims. Intra-family disputes especially over inheritance were another common source of tension prior to regularization. One woman in Lugelele explained that disputes over who had the right to land after a father’s death were frequent, sometimes leading to long-standing family divisions. However, the official documentation of land ownership helped to settle such matters in advance. This sense of stability was echoed by one young men in Ubaruku, who noted that the certificates had become a kind of family archive and evidence of agreements that could no longer be rewritten out of convenience or power struggles. Several respondents highlighted that this had brought a new level of calm during otherwise tense family discussions, particularly around divorce or succession. However, some persistent issues remained. In households where land was registered solely in the husband’s name, widows and children often found themselves vulnerable, especially in the event of the husband's death. In Kongolo Mswiswi, one widow recounted how her in-laws began to claim her late husband’s land despite the fact she had lived on it for over twenty years. This highlighted the continuing need for gender-sensitive approaches to land titling and deeper community education on legal inheritance rights. In some few cases, there were also isolated cases of confusion during the verification process such as misregistered names which occasionally led to new conflicts. These cases, however, were relatively few and were often resolved through follow-up by local leaders and regularization committees. In addition, one youth in Madibira noted that regularization had prevented land grabbing by older relatives. Some uncles used to just take land, saying you’re too young to own it. Now if the title is in your name, even if you’re 19, it’s yours. This indicates that regularization also created a protective buffer for younger generations, giving them more autonomy over inherited property. The findings demonstrate that land regularization has not only resolved many longstanding disputes but has also created a foundation for more peaceful, predictable, and just land governance at the household and community levels. Enhancement of gender-inclusive land ownership Another transformative impact of the land regularization process in Mbarali District was its gradual but meaningful contribution to enhancing gender-inclusive land ownership. Across the eight peri-urban settlements, the project’s emphasis on awareness raising and community dialogue helped bring gender equity into everyday conversations about land rights. While gender-inclusive land titling was not yet the norm everywhere, several encouraging examples showed how attitudes were beginning to shift, particularly in Madibira, Mapogoro, and Igurusi. In Madibira, findings from focus group discussions with women’s groups revealed a strong impact of the sensitization meetings and advocacy campaigns on shifting perceptions around marital land rights. Messages promoting joint ownership between spouses were not only repeatedly emphasized throughout the implementation process but were also widely accepted and internalized by many families. These messages challenged existing norms and created new expectations around equality in land rights within households. The influence of these campaigns was particularly visible in how women articulated a newfound sense of legitimacy and recognition, especially when their names appeared alongside their husbands’ on land titles. This transformation was not only legal but also emotional as women (in FGDs) felt a deeper sense of dignity and visibility in their own homes and communities. In Mapogoro, ward leaders and community development officers played a proactive role in reinforcing these messages even after the official regularization activities were completed. They held follow-up meetings and encouraged families to reflect on joint ownership, framing it as both a legal safeguard and a gesture of mutual respect within marriage. This continuous engagement helped bridge the gap between formal policy and everyday family decisions. The study also found that these changes were more easily embraced among younger couples. In areas like Igurusi, many younger men openly supported the idea of including their wives on title documents, especially in cases where both partners had contributed to acquiring or developing the land. This generational shift toward shared decision-making and equality appeared to reflect broader changes in how relationships are evolving in peri-urban communities. The findings suggest that the regularization project, when paired with consistent gender messaging and local follow-up, has had a meaningful impact on shifting social norms. The promotion of joint ownership was not just a technical recommendation but became a tool for fostering fairness, family dialogue, and greater gender equity in land relations, as one woman explained in an interview; "When both our names are on the land, it’s not just about ownership; it’s about respect, partnership, and showing our children what equality looks like at home." However, the findings were not equal in all areas. In some cases, women reported attempting to negotiate joint ownership but being denied by their spouses. In Lugelele, a widow explained that she had asked her late husband to include her name on the title, but he refused, saying that land is for men. After his death, her in-laws attempted to claim the plot, leaving her in a vulnerable position until he was assisted by the social welfare office of Mbarali District. Protection and recognition of public and community spaces One of the significant yet often overlooked impacts of the informal settlement land regularization process in Mbarali District was its role in identifying, protecting, and reinforcing the collective value of public land. In several of the eight peri-urban settlements particularly in Igurusi, Rujewa, and Madibira, respondents reported that the mapping of public spaces during the regularisation process fundamentally changed how they viewed and treated shared land. Spaces allocated for schools, markets, health dispensaries, playgrounds, and open gathering areas were no longer seen as idle or available for individual use. Instead, they became clearly understood as communal assets meant to benefit all community members. The visible and formal allocation of public land fostered a sense of collective responsibility and pride. Youth groups in Rujewa, for example, began organizing sports and social activities on newly recognized public fields, while in Madibira; women’s groups initiated grassroots environmental efforts by planting trees and planning community rest areas. These actions emerged organically without donor support once the land’s communal purpose was understood and its security affirmed by the mapping process. Such examples highlight how public land, when clearly marked and communicated, can become a focal point for self-driven community development. In Mswiswi, regularization also led to greater respect for public boundaries. Local leaders recalled how informal vendors who had previously occupied parts of a planned market area voluntarily vacated once the layout was publicly shared and explained, recognizing the space was reserved for community businesses. However, the process also exposed gaps in governance and enforcement. In Lugelele, community members expressed frustration when a public plot intended for a future market was quietly fenced off by a well-connected private individual. Although the land had been clearly earmarked during the regularization process, the lack of swift enforcement left the community unsure of its fate. A similar scenario unfolded in Ubaruku, where youth reported that land designated for a football field was being encroached upon by private development interests. While the regularization process created clarity and community goodwill, the findings reveal that sustained benefit relies heavily on post-mapping enforcement, vigilant local leadership, and continued public engagement. Without these, the findings have shown that mapped public spaces remain vulnerable to elite capture or informal privatization undermining the community trust and cooperation that regularization seeks to build. One respondent in Rujewa during an interview captured the emotional significance of this shift in public land perception, he narrated that: We used to think any open space was for taking. But now we know this field belongs to everyone; it’s for sports, for events. We now protect it. This quotation reflect a deeper cultural transformation whereby community members no longer see public land as empty or up for grabs, but as a shared inheritance requiring collective care and stewardship. Socio-economic empowerment and investment confidence A compelling theme that emerged from the study was the noticeable rise in socio-economic empowerment and investment confidence following the land regularization process. Across multiple project areas particularly in Kongolo Mswiswi, Ubaruku, and Igurusi community members reported that gaining legal recognition of their plots had fundamentally shifted how they viewed and used their land. No longer just a space for shelter, land became an economic asset that opened up new opportunities for financial planning, credit access, and small-scale entrepreneurship. In Kongolo Mswiswi, Village Community Bank (VICOBA) groups reported increased confidence in lending activities. Members felt more secure offering larger loans because borrowers could now present official land documents as a form of trust. This shift encouraged more active financial participation among community members, especially women, who used their land titles to access credit and expand small businesses like tailoring, food vending, and poultry keeping. In Ubaruku, the data reflected a growing tendency among youth to invest in long-term income-generating activities connected with rice farming. Some had built rental rooms on their plots, others had started backyard farming or brick making, and many expressed that their land now symbolized a reliable source of future stability. In Igurusi, a group of widows collectively developed a vegetable garden on land they collectively owned and secured a title through the regularization exercise that was used to get a loan worth Tshs twenty million. With newfound legal protection and loan at hand, they confidently collaborated with a local Non-Government Organisation to access irrigation tools and seed support. The garden quickly became both a steady income source and a symbol of independence for the women involved as they used to sell the produce to big hotels in Mbeya Region. Their experience illustrated how legal land ownership, when paired with community organization and modest support, could significantly enhance the livelihoods of marginalized groups. However, the economic benefits were not uniformly felt. In areas like Mapogoro and Lugelele, some respondents reported that while the land title brought peace of mind, it did not immediately improve their financial status. Some of them struggled to leverage their certificate of title for income because of poor financial information and knowledge associated with available loaning opportunities. Their experiences highlighted the need for post-regularization support such as microcredit access, training, and cooperative-based programs to ensure that the economic potential of land tenure security is realized equitably across different groups and individuals. Overall, the findings showed that land regularization helped trigger a psychological shift from insecurity to aspiration as community members began to take initiative, seek credit, and invest in small ventures, laying a foundation for greater economic resilience. Yet, the study also affirmed that tenure security alone is not enough but its full potential depends on whether complementary social and financial systems are in place, particularly for the most vulnerable. As one woman in Lugelele poignantly put it, I have the title, yes, but I still struggle to get financial support as the same is designed for the educated ones only. However, now I feel safe enough to hope. Emergence of spatial literacy and civic participation One of the most quietly transformative impacts of the land regularization process in the eight peri-urban settlements was the emergence of spatial literacy and a significant rise in civic participation. In areas such as Madibira, Igurusi, Mapogoro, Lugelele, Mapogoro and Rujewa, community members developed a practical understanding of planning maps that were once seen as exclusive to government officials and external experts. Respondents across the eight study settlements demonstrated a new awareness of spatial planning concepts such as plot numbering, road reserves, space contribution for community infrastructures, waterway buffers, and public spaces. Many community members began referring to their plot numbers and neighborhood layouts as part of routine conversations, and maps displayed in village offices were actively consulted. Women’s groups in Rujewa used these planning tools to advocate for improvements such as the preservation of pedestrian walkways and the installation of water points near high-density households. In Madibira, for instance, community members collectively opposed a planning proposal to relocate a market into a flood-prone zone, an objection grounded in their new understanding of the settlement’s layout. In Kongolo Mswiswi, bodaboda drivers acted on their knowledge of zoning by raising concerns about illegal structures that encroached on planned roads, and even reported violations to local authorities. In Lugelele, young people used layout maps to advocate for footpath improvements, while in Mapogoro, women who had never attended public meetings began participating after realizing the direct link between land decisions and household welfare. This rising civic engagement marked a shift from passive expectation to proactive involvement. These developments signaled more than a transfer of technical knowledge but marked a shift in how community members saw themselves in relation to their communities. Where previously people might have accepted changes passively or felt excluded from planning decisions, they now engaged critically and constructively. Spatial knowledge turned into civic power. The ability to read a map became a gateway to dialogue, advocacy, and accountability. One respondent in Igurusi expressed that, We used to say planning is not for us. Now I know where my plot is, where the roads go, and where the river buffer starts. I can even explain it to my children. This words captures the broader transformation witnessed across the eight settlements from the citizens who once felt disconnected from land governance to empowered citizens participating in the future of their neighborhoods. This shift represents one of the most enduring and meaningful impacts of the regularization process. Emergence of local land knowledge brokers Another subtle yet transformative impact of the land regularization initiative was the emergence of local land knowledge brokers. These are community members who, without official designation, became informal experts in interpreting land maps, boundary layouts, and the procedural steps needed to obtain or correct land documentation or title. These individuals often emerged organically through consistent participation in sensitization meetings, better literacy, or previous experience with community leadership or members of the regularisation committee. Over time, they evolved into trusted local intermediaries, helping to bridge the gap between technical land information and everyday understanding. In Rujewa, for instance, one mason gained local prominence for his ability to read and interpret the settlement layout map. He had attended nearly every village-level mapping meeting and made it a personal mission to carry a printed copy of the map with him. It was narrated that, even the village chairperson asks him when there is a dispute. He usually walks around with a copy of the layout and explains it to elders who cannot read well. His informal role became essential not only in clarifying boundaries but also in easing tensions and correcting misunderstandings before they escalated into formal disputes. Similar roles emerged in other peri-urban areas. In Mapogoro, a retired teacher was described as “the one who knows the map like the back of his hand.” Community members frequently visit him to ask for clarification about their plot number, where to go for document updates, or how to report an encroachment issue. In Ubaruku, two women from a local VICOBA group who had attended regularization trainings became important resources, especially for other women seeking help to register their land jointly with spouses or resolve titling errors. These informal knowledge brokers played a crucial role in deepening the reach and sustainability of the regularization project. By localizing technical knowledge, they helped ensure that maps, documents, and land-use plans were not just government artifacts but became living tools within the community. More importantly, their emergence signaled a shift in local leadership dynamics by introducing new roles based not on formal authority, but on access to knowledge and willingness to assist others. In Lugelele, one young man who frequently helped neighbors interpret boundary lines joked in an interview as he narrated; I am not a planner, but people now call me ‘mtaalamu wa mipaka’ (the boundary expert). Shifts in inheritance practices and intergenerational dialogue The process of land regularization in peri-urban Mbarali has not only secured land rights but also it has reshaped the way families think about, discuss, and plan inheritance. Where succession was once guided by unwritten customs, often quiet, male-dominated, and delayed until after death, the introduction of formal land titles has brought inheritance into the open, making it a practical and inclusive matter that families can no longer ignore. Before regularization, inheritance was largely managed informally. Land would typically be passed down to sons, with daughters rarely included in decision-making. These transfers often occurred after the death of a parent, leading to confusion, resentment, and in some cases, long-term family disputes. In interviews with elders, many of them admitted to have avoided talking about inheritance out of discomfort, fear of offending relatives, or a belief that such discussions were premature or disrespectful. However, as land regularization efforts led to the issuance of the granted right of occupancy, households were confronted with the need to name a legal landholder. This requirement, although administrative on the surface, prompted a profound cultural shift. Families began having open conversations about who would inherit the land and how it would be used in the future. Across all study sites, elders, parents, and even young adults described how the physical existence of a land document gave them a reason, and a responsibility to talk. These conversations, once taboo, became acts of family care and planning. In multiple households, daughters were included for the first time in succession plans. In Madibira, for instance, some fathers explicitly revised their plans to ensure fairness across all children. In other areas like Mapogoro and Mswiswi, shared usage plans were introduced, especially where land sizes were limited and family sizes were large. In one particularly striking case, a 68-year-old farmer in Ubaruku described how regularization changed his view of his daughters' rights. Though traditionally he would have passed land only to his sons, the process of registering his land led to deeper reflection. He shared: Before, I would have left it to the boys and said nothing. But when I saw my name on the title, I thought this land came from my hands, but their lives depend on it. I called all my children. We sat under the mango tree, and I told them: ‘We will write it together. So that when I go, no one cries with anger. This moment, echoed in different forms across the eight study areas, illustrates how legal recognition gave space for emotional honesty, inclusion, and future-facing decisions. Families who had never openly discussed succession were now drafting informal agreements, sometimes witnessed by local leaders or land officers. Importantly, while some elders still approached the topic with caution, the presence of the land certificate gave them a neutral reason to raise it, not as a sign of impending death, but as a matter of legal and family duty. The study found that this shift reduced the emotional burden of inheritance planning, created transparency among heirs, and, in many households, strengthened trust between generations. Growing awareness of environmental boundaries The study revealed a meaningful shift in environmental consciousness among community members of the regularized peri-urban settlements, particularly concerning ecological boundaries like river buffers, wetlands, and forest reserves. In areas such as Madibira, Igurusi, and Rujewa, what was once seen as unused or available land gradually came to be understood as vital environmental zones requiring protection. This transformation was largely the result of participatory mapping and community sensitization activities, which clarified land use classifications and educated community members about the purpose of protected areas. As a result, there was a noticeable behavioral change, especially among youth groups and community leaders, who began initiating conservation activities such as riverbank clean-ups and erosion control measures using vetiver grass in Madibira. Community members also began referencing mapped boundaries in public discussions to challenge environmentally harmful practices, marking a move from passive coexistence with nature to active stewardship. Most notably, this awareness fostered a strong sense of community responsibility and informal enforcement of environmental norms. In several cases, local individuals independently monitored and intervened when they noticed encroachments into protected zones. For instance, in Lugelele, community members halted the illegal expansion of a maize farm into a designated river Mbarali buffer, demonstrating a grassroots commitment to sustainable land use. This peer-driven accountability was not imposed by external authorities but emerged organically through shared understanding and localized action. In an interview, one respondent from Madibira narrated as follows; We didn’t know that the swamp near us is a protected area. Now we do not farm there. We even warn newcomers. Discussion The findings from the study on informal settlement land regularization in Mbarali District reveal a complex and multi-layered set of transformations that extend beyond formal land tenure security into deeper dimensions of social, economic, and spatial justice. Anchored in the Transformative Land Governance Framework (TLGF), this discussion explores how the regularization process not only facilitated access to formal land rights but also acted as a catalyst for broader community empowerment, gender equity, institutional legitimacy, and spatial restructuring. The TLGF emphasizes inclusive, transparent, and context-sensitive land governance as a foundation for sustainable development (Enemark et al., 2016 ; Palmer et al., 2009 b), and this study offers strong evidence of its practical relevance in the peri-urban Tanzanian context. A core component of the TLGF is the promotion of land tenure security as a vehicle for social transformation. In Mbarali, the study found that land regularization generated a psychological shift among community members from a state of uncertainty and invisibility to one of recognition and confidence. This transition aligns with literature emphasizing the symbolic power of legal recognition in reshaping individual and collective identities (Hall et al., 2017 ). The feeling of being “seen” by the state, as echoed in participants’ narratives, affirms the importance of emotional and psychological dimensions of land governance, often overlooked in technocratic interventions (Lombard & Rakodi, 2016 ). Moreover, the findings suggest that land tenure security enabled investment confidence and socio-economic empowerment which are key outcomes anticipated in the TLGF. As land became a secure and tradable asset, communities began to reimagine its value not just as shelter but also as capital. This mirrors global evidence that land regularization can unlock economic opportunities, particularly for the poor, when backed by legal certainty and access to markets (Byamugisha, 2013 ; K. Deininger & Feder, 2009 ). In the Mbarali case, youth and women used certificates to access credit or initiate small-scale enterprises. Yet, as studies from other African contexts have noted, the transformative potential of land tenure security remains conditional on the presence of complementary services, such as credit facilities, extension support, and legal aid (K. Deininger & Feder, 2009 ). The partial realization of economic benefits in Mapogoro and Lugelele, therefore, signals the need for a systemic, cross-sectoral approach that links tenure reform with financial inclusion, capacity building, and market access. The reduction in land-related conflicts reported in all eight settlements affirms TLGF’s assertion that clarity of land rights and inclusive documentation mechanisms are essential for sustainable peace and justice. Prior to regularization, the ambiguity of customary or informal arrangements had frequently sparked disputes over boundaries, inheritance, and gendered access to land. The introduction of official boundaries and documented titles curtailed these tensions, as found in similar contexts like Rwanda and Ethiopia (K. W. Deininger, 2025 ). However, gender-specific vulnerabilities such as exclusion of women from certificates and intra-family succession battles persisted in some areas, revealing the limits of legal reform without deliberate social transformation (Makota, 2018a ). Gender-inclusive land ownership emerged as one of the most promising, yet fragile, impacts of the regularization process. The inclusion of women’s names on titles, particularly among younger couples, marked a notable shift in social norms and intra-household power dynamics. These findings echo global trends that link joint titling with improved bargaining power for women and more stable household investments (Daley & Englert, 2010b ). However, the resistance faced by women in areas like Lugelele reflects persistent patriarchal norms that hinder gender-equitable land governance. According to Makota, ( 2018a ), securing women’s land rights requires not only legal reform but also continuous public education, institutional responsiveness, and gender mainstreaming within land administration. The proactive role of ward leaders and women’s officers in Mapogoro illustrates the potential of community-level actors in bridging formal frameworks with everyday gender realities. One of the most profound yet underexplored impacts of the regularization process was the recognition and safeguarding of public and communal spaces. The TLGF emphasizes that just land governance must not only serve individual property rights but also protect collective interests and future generations (Borras Jr & Franco, 2010 ). In Igurusi, Rujewa, and Madibira, formal mapping and demarcation of public land created a renewed sense of shared ownership, stewardship, and civic pride. This transformation of perception from viewing open spaces as unclaimed land to recognizing them as community assets aligns with empirical studies showing how spatial planning can enhance local democracy and collective agency (Kombe & Kreibich, 2000a ). However, the emerging threats of elite capture, as seen in Ubaruku and Lugelele, point to the fragility of public land governance in the absence of vigilant enforcement, robust legal safeguards, and institutional transparency (Bugri & Yuonayel, 2015). Importantly, the study revealed that land regularization fostered a sense of citizenship and political belonging among community members who had long felt marginalized by state structures. This aligns with TLGF’s view of land as a platform for constructing inclusive citizenship and enhancing state-society relations (Borras Jr & Franco, 2010 ). In Mbarali, formal recognition through land titles translated into increased participation in village meetings, demand for services, and greater trust in local institutions. These shifts demonstrate that land governance is not merely a technical activity but a deeply political process that reconfigures power relations and redefines the social contract (Lund, 2017 ). Furthermore, another striking impact relates to the emergence of spatial literacy among community members, which sparked a significant rise in civic participation. The regularization process introduced community members to spatial planning concepts previously seen as the exclusive domain of government officials or experts such as plot numbering, road reserves, and buffer zones. This democratization of spatial knowledge echoes calls by scholars for bottom-up empowerment through land literacy, enabling citizens to become active interlocutors in land governance rather than passive subjects (Chamberlain, 2025 ). The ability of community members to read and reference maps in everyday discourse and advocacy illustrates a profound shift in how community members perceive their role within the spatial order of their settlements. Such spatial literacy is a foundational element of transformative governance, as it allows individuals to understand and negotiate land rights, infrastructure development, and public space protection (Kombe & Kreibich, 2000b ). Moreover, the uptake of spatial knowledge translated directly into increased community activism and collective action. The case where Madibira community members successfully opposed relocating a market to a flood-prone area, or where bodaboda drivers in Kongolo Mswiswi reported zoning violations, exemplify how spatial awareness catalyzes accountability and contestation against potentially harmful planning decisions (Stein et al., 2024 ). These examples resonate with the broader literature emphasizing that land governance must be participatory and responsive to local actors to be truly transformative. Importantly, this enhanced civic engagement is not merely reactive but represents a shift from passive expectation to proactive involvement, signaling growing citizen confidence and the embedding of spatial knowledge as civic power. Closely linked to this phenomenon was the emergence of local land knowledge brokers, informal yet pivotal figures within communities who became trusted interpreters of land documentation and procedural processes. The rise of these brokers reflects a crucial localization of land governance that TLGF highlights where transformation is not imposed top-down but co-created with communities through new social roles that transcend formal authority (Borras Jr & Franco, 2010 ; Lund, 2017 ). These brokers bridged the gap between technical land administration and everyday understanding, facilitating conflict resolution, documentation updates, and wider awareness. This aligns with the idea that effective governance depends on hybrid institutional arrangements combining formal rules with informal practices and local expertise (Boone, 2014 ; Chigbu, 2021 ). In Mbarali, the informal experts whether masons, retired teachers, or women leaders embodied a democratization of land knowledge and helped sustain the regularization project’s impact beyond official activities. This suggests that transformative land governance should actively nurture and integrate such community-based knowledge intermediaries to enhance legitimacy and trust (Nuhu et al., 2023b ). The study also reveals how regularization catalyzed important shifts in inheritance practices and intergenerational dialogue. The formalization of land rights encouraged families to move from oral, informal succession traditions towards documented, inclusive planning involving multiple heirs, including daughters. This is a significant departure from customary land norms in many Tanzanian contexts, where inheritance is often male-dominated and shrouded in silence (Chimhowu, 2019 ). By providing a legal basis and social legitimacy for succession discussions, the process helped reduce uncertainty and conflict, fostering fairness and predictability for future generations. Such developments echo recent scholarship emphasizing the role of formal land rights in promoting gender equity and peaceful intergenerational transitions (Lusasi & Mwaseba, 2020 ). Yet the persistence of cultural reticence and some elders’ discomfort highlights that legal reform alone is insufficient; ongoing sensitization and culturally attuned strategies are needed to embed these positive changes sustainably (Lusasi & Mwaseba, 2020 ; Makota, 2018b ). Furthermore, the study highlights a growing environmental consciousness, notably regarding the protection of ecological boundaries such as wetlands, river buffers, and forest reserves. Participatory mapping and sensitization activities raised awareness about the critical ecological functions of these areas and encouraged community-led conservation efforts such as riverbank clean-ups and erosion control using vetiver grass. This grassroots environmental stewardship is consistent with TLGF’s insistence that land governance must safeguard natural resources as common goods for current and future generations (Enemark et al., 2016 ). Moreover, informal peer monitoring and enforcement of environmental norms exemplified by the community’s prevention of illegal maize farming in buffer zones demonstrate a community-driven compliance model that external authorities often struggle to achieve (Stein et al., 2024 ). These findings reinforce the potential for land regularization to serve as an entry point for integrated land-use planning and sustainable environmental management, especially when communities are empowered as active custodians rather than passive beneficiaries (De Vries et al., 2020 ; Usika et al., 2024 ). Together, these interconnected findings demonstrate that land regularization in Mbarali does more than confer legal ownership; it reconfigures power relations, social identities, and environmental practices in ways that resonate with the transformative ambitions of the TLGF. It shifts the citizen-state relationship from one of exclusion and passivity to one characterized by dialogue, shared responsibility, and accountability. This echoes broader global calls to view land governance not as a technocratic exercise but as a socio-political process grounded in equity, inclusion, and sustainability (Borras & Franco, 2010 ; Palmer et al., 2009 b). Furthermore, the emergence of localized leadership based on knowledge rather than formal status reflects a democratic deepening, where authority is earned through service and competence, not merely position (Lund, 2017 ). However, the study also highlights several challenges and limitations that temper the transformative potential. Delays in issuing formal certificates risked undermining trust and dampening momentum, a problem widely reported in land regularization literature (Chimhowu, 2019 ). Errors in documentation and occasional exclusion of women from titles pose risks to social justice and could ignite conflicts if unaddressed. These challenges emphasize the need for robust, gender-sensitive institutional capacity, efficient grievance mechanisms, and continuous community engagement to sustain transformative gains. Moreover, the persistence of cultural norms resistant to joint titling and open inheritance discussions indicates that land governance reforms must be complemented by long-term social change efforts to embed new norms around equity and inclusion (Makota, 2018a ; Msangi et al., 2023 ). In conclusion, this study enriches the evidence base supporting the Transformative Land Governance Framework by demonstrating how informal settlement regularization can act as a catalyst for multi-dimensional community transformation in peri-urban Tanzania. The process generated new forms of spatial literacy, fostered active citizenship, nurtured local knowledge brokers, reshaped inheritance practices, and enhanced environmental stewardship each reinforcing the others in a virtuous cycle of empowerment and justice. To fully realize this potential, land regularization initiatives must be designed and implemented with an explicit focus on social inclusion, institutional capacity-building and continuous dialogue with communities. Declarations Conflict of Interest The authors declares no conflict of interest related to this study. Funding Information The study was not funded Author Contribution The author actively involved in all stages of the study. He conceptualized the research, designed the methodology, and carried out fieldwork. The author analyzed the data, discussed the findings, and wrote the manuscript alone. The author reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript before submission. Ethical Statement This study was carried out in line with established ethical research standards. Before any fieldwork began, ethical clearance was formally approved by the Ethical Clearance Committee of the School of Spatial Planning and Social Science at Ardhi University. In addition, all necessary permissions were obtained from local government authorities in Mbarali District. Everyone who took part in the study, whether in focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, or through participant observation was fully informed about the purpose of the research and gave their voluntary consent to participate. Every effort was made to protect the privacy, dignity, and confidentiality of all participants throughout the research process. References Amanor, K. (2012). Land governance in Africa: How historical context has shaped key contemporary issues . International Land Coalition. https://www.landcoalition.org/en/resources/land-governance-in-africa/ Andreasen, M. H., McGranahan, G., Kyessi, A., & Kombe, W. (2020a). Informal land investments and wealth accumulation in the context of regularization: Case studies from Dar es Salaam and Mwanza. Environment and Urbanization , 32 (1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247819896265 Andreasen, M. H., McGranahan, G., Kyessi, A., & Kombe, W. (2020b). Informal land investments and wealth accumulation in the context of regularization: Case studies from Dar es Salaam and Mwanza. Environment and Urbanization , 32 (1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247819896265 Boone, C. (2014). Property and political order in Africa: Land rights and the structure of politics . Cambridge University Press. Borras Jr, S. M., & Franco, J. C. (2010). Contemporary Discourses and Contestations around Pro‐Poor Land Policies and Land Governance. Journal of Agrarian Change , 10 (1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00243.x Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods . Oxford university press. Bugri, J. T., & Yuonayel, E. M. (2015). Traditional authorities and peri-urban land management in Ghana: Evidence from Wa. Journal of Resources Development and Management , 13 (9), 68–79. Byamugisha, F. F. (2013). Securing Africa’s land for shared prosperity: A program to scale up reforms and investments . World Bank Publications. Chamberlain, W. (2025). Tenure security for sustainable livelihoods . FAO. https://www.fao.org/tenure-security Chigbu, U. E. (2021). Institutional success factors in spatial planning for socioeconomically and ecologically sustainable peri-urban Ethiopia: Insights from Rwanda and Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 101 , 105141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105141 Chigbu, U. E., Schopf, A., De Vries, W. T., Masum, F., Mabikke, S., Antonio, D., & Espinoza, J. (2017). Combining land-use planning and tenure security: A tenure responsive land-use planning approach for developing countries. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , 60 (9), 1622–1639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1245655 Chimhowu, A. (2019). The ‘new’African customary land tenure. Characteristic, features and policy implications of a new paradigm. Land Use Policy , 81 , 897–903. Daley, E., & Englert, B. (2010a). Securing land rights for women. Journal of Eastern African Studies , 4 (1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531050903556675 Daley, E., & Englert, B. (2010b). Securing land rights for women. Journal of Eastern African Studies , 4 (1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531050903556675 De Vries, W. T., Bugri, J. T., & Mandhu, F. (2020). Responsible and smart land management interventions: An African context . CRC Press. Deininger, K., & Feder, G. (2009). Land registration, governance, and development: Evidence and implications for policy. The World Bank Research Observer , 24 (2), 233–266. Deininger, K. W. (2025). Innovations in land rights recognition, administration, and governance . World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9578-1 Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Dodgson, J. E. (2017). About Research: Qualitative Methodologies. Journal of Human Lactation , 33 (2), 355–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334417698693 Durand-Lasserve, A., & Royston, L. (Eds.). (2002). Holding their ground: Secure land tenure for the urban poor in developing countries . Earthscan Publications. Enemark, S., McLaren, R., Lemmen, C., Antonio, D., & Gitau, J. (2016). A guide for building fit-for-purpose land administration systems in less developed countries: Capacity development, change management and project delivery. Scaling up Responsible Land Governance: Proceedings of the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, 14-18 March 2016, Washington DC, United States , 1–21. Fimbo, G. M. (2004). Land law reforms in Tanzania . Dar es Salaam University Press. Hall, R., Edelman, M., Borras, S. M., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2017). Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below.’ In Global land grabbing and political reactions’ from below’ (pp. 1–22). Kabigi, B., Haule, K., & Kilonzo, R. (2024). The gendered land tenure security in Tanzania: Variations through Geo-demographic factors. African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences , 7 (4), 1197–1213. https://revues.imist.ma/index.php/AJLP-GS/article/view/48274 Kamoleka, T. N., & Lucian, C. A. (2024). Evaluating Alternative Dispute Resolution in Resolving Land Conflicts in Ifakara, Tanzania. African Journal on Conflict Resolution , 24 (2), 29–56. https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/ejc-accordr_v24_n2_a3 Kironde, J. L. (2009). Improving land sector governance in Africa: The case of Tanzania. Workshop on “Land Governance in Support of the MDGs: Responding to New Challenges , 1–29. https://landwise-production.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/2022/03/Kironde_Improving-land-sector-governance-in-Africa-case-of-Tanzania_2009-1.pdf Kironde, J. M. L. (2019). Community-based settlements regularization: Lessons for scaling up from Makongo Juu informal settlement, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Current Urban Studies , 7 (02), 170. https://www.scirp.org/html/2-1150361_92934.htm Kitosi, P., Mwipopo, D., Murro, G., Kimilo, A., & Kapinga, M. (2024). THE NATURE OF LAND CONFLICTS IN INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS: EXPERIENCE FROM REGUARIZATION PROJECTS, THE CASE OF DAR ES SALAM, TANZANIA. African Journal of Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences , 7 (2), 555–567. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/346025/ Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. Bmj , 311 (7000), 299–302. https://www.bmj.com/content/311/7000/299.short Kombe, W. J., & Kreibich, V. (2000a). Informal land management in Tanzania . SPRING Centre, Faculty of Spatial Plannning, University of Dortmund, Germany. Kombe, W. J., & Kreibich, V. (2000b). Reconciling informal and formal land management: An agenda for improving tenure security and urban governance in poor countries. Habitat International , 24 (2), 231–240. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397599000417 Kombe, W. J., & Kreibich, V. (2006). Governance of informal urbanisation in Tanzania . Mkuki na Nyota Publishers. Lombard, M., & Rakodi, C. (2016). Urban land conflict in the Global South: Towards an analytical framework. Urban Studies , 53 (13), 2683–2699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016659616 Lund, C. (2017). Rule and Rupture: State Formation through the Production of Property and Citizenship. In C. Lund & M. Eilenberg (Eds.), Rule and Rupture (1st ed., pp. 1–29). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119384816.ch1 Lusasi, J., & Mwaseba, D. (2020). Gender inequality and symbolic violence in women’s access to family land in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Land , 9 (11), 468. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/11/468 Magina, F. B., Kyessi, A., & Kombe, W. (2020). The urban land nexus–challenges and opportunities of regularising informal settlements: The case studies of Dar es Salaam and Mwanza in Tanzania. Journal of African Real Estate Research , 5 (1), 32–54. https://journals.uct.ac.za/index.php/JARER/article/view/837 Makota, N. N. (2018a). Impact of Land Regularization on Empowerment of Women in Developing Countries: A Case of Urban Informal Settlements in Tanzania. [PhD Thesis, The Open University of Tanzania]. http://repository.out.ac.tz/id/eprint/2282 Makota, N. N. (2018b). Impact of Land Regularization on Empowerment of Women in Developing Countries: A Case of Urban Informal Settlements in Tanzania. [PhD Thesis, The Open University of Tanzania]. http://repository.out.ac.tz/id/eprint/2282 Mbilinyi, J., L. Kaswamila, A., & A. Assenga, E. (2023). Challenges of Land Regularization in Unplanned Peri-urban Settlements in Tanzania. African Journal of Development Studies (Formerly AFFRIKA Journal of Politics, Economics and Society) , 13 (2), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3649/2023/v13n2a4 Mbilinyi, J., Kaswamila, A., & Assenga, E. (2022). Land Regularization and Its Impact on Household Livelihoods In Dar es Salaam and Mwanza Cities, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal for Population Studies and Development , 29 (2), 145–164. https://tjpsd.udsm.ac.tz/index.php/tjpsd/article/view/179 Msangi, H. A., Waized, B., Löhr, K., Sieber, S., & Ndyetabula, D. W. (2023). Development outcomes of land tenure formalization under customary and statutory land tenure systems in Tanzania: A multinomial endogenous switching regression approach. Agriculture & Food Security , 11 (1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00403-3 Nuhu, S. (2019). Peri-Urban Land Governance in Developing Countries: Understanding the Role, Interaction and Power Relation Among Actors in Tanzania. Urban Forum , 30 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-018-9339-2 Nuhu, S., Munuo, N., & Mngumi, L. (2023a). Governance challenges of regularisation of informal settlements in peri-urban Tanzania: Perspectives from local stakeholders. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development , 15 (1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2023.2167821 Nuhu, S., Munuo, N., & Mngumi, L. (2023b). Governance challenges of regularisation of informal settlements in peri-urban Tanzania: Perspectives from local stakeholders. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development , 15 (1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2023.2167821 Palmer, D., Fricska, S., & Wehrmann, B. (2009). Towards improved land governance . Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and UN-Habitat. https://gltn.net/download/towards-improved-land-governance/ Payne, G. (2001). Urban land tenure policy options: Titles or rights? Habitat International , 25 (3), 415–429. Stein, H., Odgaard, R., Askew, K., & Maganga, F. (2024). The World Bank and Rural Land Titling in Africa: The Case of Tanzania. Development and Change , 55 (6), 1150–1181. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12866 Ubink, J. (2018). Customary Legal Empowerment in Namibia and Ghana? Lessons about Access, Power and Participation in Non‐state Justice Systems. Development and Change , 49 (4), 930–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12415 Usika, G., Urassa, J. K., & Kabote, S. (2024). Implication of Institutional Frameworks Governing Land Tenure Security in Social-Economic Dynamics: Experience from Iringa District in Tanzania. Journal of Public Policy and Administration , 9 (1), 58–79. Wankogere, S. D., & Alananga, S. S. (2020). Factors affecting land titling during regularization of informal settlements in Dar es Salaam Tanzania. International Journal of Real Estate Studies , 14 (2), 73–97. Zhang, J., Shuang Chen, S., Gao, Q., Shen, Q., Kimirei, I. A., & Mapunda, D. W. (2020). Morphological characteristics of informal settlements and strategic suggestions for urban sustainable development in Tanzania: Dar es Salaam, Mwanza, and Kigoma. Sustainability , 12 (9), 3807. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6939498","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":489535158,"identity":"30b9c2fe-7985-4aa2-912c-cd2856a4dccc","order_by":0,"name":"Mussa Muhoja","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ardhi University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mussa","middleName":"","lastName":"Muhoja","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-06-20 13:53:21","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6939498/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6939498/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":87723895,"identity":"643b9ea4-994d-4f98-87d2-472522be2d7e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-07-28 10:23:18","extension":"jpeg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":255174,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eGeographic distribution of regularized informal settlements in Mbarali District, Tanzania\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6939498/v1/70f12859d380e1151d22311b.jpeg"},{"id":87724142,"identity":"f4621ff3-b6ba-4f6b-b87b-f75ec38a17ce","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-07-28 10:23:42","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":989503,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6939498/v1/f9503c1f-b699-4e68-91f5-f354efdfe5e9.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eThe Dynamic Impacts of Informal Settlement Land Regularization on Community Transformation and Land Governance in Peri-Urban Tanzania: \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cem\u003eEvidence from eight settlements in Mbarali District\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn recent years, the governance of land in rapidly urbanizing regions of the Global South has come under increased scrutiny, particularly as informal settlements proliferate along urban peripheries (Magina et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Nuhu, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Nuhu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023a\u003c/span\u003e). These informal spaces, often unplanned and lacking legal recognition, have become the dominant form of settlement growth in African cities (Nuhu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023b\u003c/span\u003e). The 1995 Urban and Housing Indicators Programme indicated that 70% of Tanzania's population lived in informal settlements, a figure that has since risen sharply to 80% according to recent studies (Magina et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Between 40% and 80% of built-up areas in Tanzania are classified as informal, with most urban households residing in such settlements (Zhang et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). This trend has been particularly evident in peri-urban areas, where rural land transitions to urban uses with minimal regulation, often resulting in overlapping claims, haphazard development, and contested land rights (Kironde, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Stein et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Tanzania, like many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, the expansion of informal settlements reflects deeper issues of rural-to-urban migration, poverty, unequal access to formal land markets, and the failure of statutory planning systems to respond effectively to local needs (Kironde, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Stein et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). In response, various governments and development agencies have turned to land regularization as a policy instrument to address these challenges, seeking to formalize informal settlements by granting secure tenure, producing planning layouts, and integrating marginalized communities into the formal land management framework (Andreasen et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020a\u003c/span\u003e; Makota, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018a\u003c/span\u003e). While the approach is often celebrated for its potential to deliver legal titles and stimulate investment, its deeper impacts on social relations, community empowerment, and spatial awareness are less understood particularly in peri-urban African contexts where hybrid forms of land governance prevail (Chimhowu, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Lund, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eScholars have warned that if not carefully designed, regularization may reinforce existing inequalities or fail to meaningfully engage the communities it aims to benefit (Borras Jr \u0026amp; Franco, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Ubink, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). As such, there is growing recognition that successful land regularization must transcend legal formalization and engage with the lived realities, knowledge systems, and aspirations of the people (Chigbu, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Chigbu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). Despite the growing enthusiasm for informal settlement land regularization as a tool for improved land governance, the evidence base remains limited regarding its social, cultural, and environmental consequences at the grassroots level. Much of the literature has focused on the legal and administrative dimensions of regularization such as titling procedures, mapping technologies, and institutional frameworks without fully exploring how these processes reshape community behavior, social relations, and civic engagement (Chimhowu, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Payne, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2001\u003c/span\u003e). Yet, as recent scholarship underlines, land governance is not merely a technical or legal exercise but a deeply political and cultural process that involves contestation, negotiation, and transformation (Lund, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study aims to fill that gap by taking a holistic lens on informal settlement land regularization in peri-urban Tanzania. It asks; how does a land regularization program affect multiple dimensions of community life. This study investigates eight peri-urban settlements in Mbarali District namely Madibira, Ubaruku, Rujewa, Lugelele, Mapogoro, Igurusi, and Kongolo Mswiswi that have undergone land regularization since 2019. It moves beyond single-focus analysis to adopt a multi-dimensional analysis, embracing a broader understanding of impact. This approach is guided by recent calls to view land regularization not only as a legal process but also as a form of socio-political transformation (Magina et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Wankogere \u0026amp; Alananga, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study looks on post-implementation impacts of what happened after maps were drawn, certificates issued, and land claims formalized. The stud further asks questions such as; did people invest more in homes? Did women gain ownership? Did communities protect public and natural assets? Did everyday participation and psychological well-being improve? Who was left behind? Studies such as those of Andreasen et al., (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020b\u003c/span\u003e); and Magina et al., (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e), began to explore livelihood impacts and participatory practices, but often stopped short of analyzing social cohesion, psychological effects, ecological awareness, and gender inclusion in a unified framework. Moreover, emerging evidence from Mbilinyi et al., (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e) flags ongoing challenges on bureaucracy, cost barriers, and land conflicts but again focuses narrowly on procedural constraints rather than broader social consequences. By embedding this study within the broader literature, it tests whether claims of inclusion and empowerment can be realized in practice, in environments that are more contested, less resourced, and more vulnerable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\n"},{"header":"Conceptual Framework","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study applied the Transformative Land Governance Framework (TLGF) to understand informal settlement land regularization in peri-urban Mbarali not simply as a legal or technical intervention, but as a deeply transformative process that reshapes social relations, power dynamics, and community identities. Central to this framework is the idea that land governance should actively correct historical injustices and empower marginalized groups, making land rights a tool for broader social change rather than just formal ownership (Borras Jr \u0026amp; Franco, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). The transformative nature of this framework lies in its five core pillars, which guided the study’s analysis. First, it emphasized that tenure security must lead to empowerment, meaning that formal land documents should enable community members to invest confidently and participate fully in decision-making, going beyond mere legal recognition (Durand-Lasserve \u0026amp; Royston, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSecond, the framework’s focus on inclusive participation ensured that the study examined not only who received land titles but how diverse groups, including women and youth, engaged meaningfully in planning and spatial decision-making, recognizing that real transformation requires widespread community involvement (Palmer et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003ea). Third, the framework’s pillar of equity and gender justice helped surface persistent inequalities in land access and control, highlighting that transformative governance must challenge entrenched norms and power structures rather than reinforce them (Daley \u0026amp; Englert, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010a\u003c/span\u003e). Fourth, spatial justice reminded the study to look beyond individual ownership to the protection of commons and public spaces, recognizing that transformation involves defending collective interests against elite capture and informal privatization (Kombe \u0026amp; Kreibich, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFinally, the framework emphasized that transformation includes social and psychological shifts focusing on how communities see themselves, their relationship with the state, and their visions for the future (S. J. Borras \u0026amp; Franco, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). This helped frame the analysis of changes in civic identity and intergenerational engagement in Mbarali. By using the TLGF, the study was able to explore informal settlement land regularization as a catalyst for social justice, empowerment, and inclusive development, revealing both its potential and its challenges. This approach echoes similar transformative analyses in African and global contexts, underscoring the critical role of land governance in driving equitable social change (Amanor, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Borras Jr \u0026amp; Franco, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study adopted a qualitative research approach to explore the complex and lived realities of how informal settlement land regularization contributes to community transformation in the peri-urban areas of Mbarali District. A qualitative design was most appropriate because it allowed the researcher to deeply engage with local voices, community narratives, and social meanings that cannot be captured through numerical data (Denzin \u0026amp; Lincoln, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). Given that, the focus of the study was to understand how communities experience land regularization in practice, how it shapes identity, power relations, access to land, and spatial justice, and a qualitative methodology provided the flexibility to capture diverse and context-specific experiences (Denzin \u0026amp; Lincoln, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo identify participants, the study employed a combination of purposive and snowball sampling. Purposive sampling was used to intentionally select individuals with direct knowledge or experience related to the regularization project in eight selected peri-urban areas of Mbarali district where the project was executed from 2019–2024. These included local government officials, community leaders, members of land regularization committees, women leaders, youth representatives, and community members who had received certificates of right of occupancy (CROs). This method ensured that the data reflected perspectives from those who were most directly affected by or involved in the regularization process (Palinkas et al., 2015). Snowball sampling was then used to reach additional informants who experienced either transformative impacts or social and economic changes after the implementation of the informal settlement land regularization project in Mbarali district. Through recommendations from initial participants, the researcher was able to identify hard-to-reach voices and marginalized groups, which added depth and inclusiveness to the data.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study used four key data collection methods: observations, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and document analysis. Observation was used to physically visit and closely examine the communities in order to directly see the real changes and improvements that took place after land regularization (Dodgson, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). In-depth interviews were held with community leaders, local government officials, regularization committee members, and community members to gather individual reflections on the benefits, tensions, and socio-spatial impacts of regularization. These interviews provided rich, personal narratives and historical context. Focus group discussions were conducted with specific groups such as VICOBA members, women’s groups, and bodaboda associations to capture collective perspectives and identify shared challenges or successes (Kitzinger, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e). Lastly, document analysis was used to examine relevant land policy documents, project annual reports, town planning maps and approved survey plans of the studies areas, and minutes from community and planning meetings. This secondary data helped validate field findings and provided institutional context for how land governance has evolved in the study area (Kamoleka \u0026amp; Lucian, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe data collected in this study were analyzed using thematic analysis, a method well suited for identifying, organizing, and interpreting patterns within qualitative data. The process began with the transcription of interviews, focus group discussions, and field notes from observations, followed by multiple readings to gain familiarity with the data. Coding was then applied to categorize segments of the text according to emerging and pre-identified themes. NVivo 12 software was used to assist in managing and organizing the large volume of textual data, making it easier to cluster codes into broader themes. These themes were then interpreted in light of the study’s conceptual framework (Transformative Land Governance) allowing the analysis to link empirical findings with theoretical constructs and to understand how community transformation unfolded across the eight peri-urban settlements under the study. Triangulation across interviews, FGDs, observations, and document reviews enhanced the reliability of the analysis and ensured that the interpretations were grounded in multiple forms of evidence.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study followed ethical research standards to ensure respect, confidentiality, and voluntary participation. Informed consent was obtained from all participants after explaining the purpose of the study, their rights, and how their information would be used. Sensitive issues, especially those involving land ownership and community tensions, were handled with care to avoid escalating conflicts or causing harm (Bryman, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Identities of participants were kept anonymous, and data was securely stored to protect privacy throughout the research process.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Findings: Evidence from eight Peri urban areas of Mbarali district","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eStudy location\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eMbarali District, the focus area of the project under the study, is one of the most rapidly urbanizing parts of Mbeya Region. Spanning 14,438 square kilometers, the district has experienced significant population growth from 300,517 in 2012 to 446,336 in 2023 (URT, 2012; 2023). This population surge has fueled the expansion of both existing settlements and new urban centers. Formerly rural areas like Rujewa, Igawa, Igurusi, Ubaruku, and Madibira have transformed into bustling townships. For example, Ubaruku Ward became the district\u0026rsquo;s most densely populated area in 2022, with a population density of 738.6 people per square kilometer (URT, 2023).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eUrban growth in Mbarali is closely tied to its strategic location and strong agricultural economy. Located within the fertile Usangu plains, the district has become a hub for large-scale rice farming, including irrigation schemes such as the well-known Kapunga and Highland projects. These developments attract not only farmers but also traders and service providers. In addition, the district benefits from being situated along the TANZAM highway, a major transportation corridor that enhances trade and mobility, further encouraging settlement growth along its route (Mbarali District Report, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis rapid and dynamic urbanization, while promising, has also brought challenges especially the proliferation of informal settlements lacking adequate infrastructure and secure land tenure. It is within this context, and following the call from communities in the study areas, that the regularization efforts were carried out, aimed at bringing order, security, and opportunity to thousands of landowners across the eight townships of Madibira, Utengule, Ubaruku, Rujewa, Lugelele, Mapogoro, Igurusi, and Kongolo Mswiswi.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eProject background\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe regularization of informal settlements in Mbarali District, located in Mbeya Region in southern Tanzania, emerged directly from the needs and voices of the local communities. In 2019, Ardhi University, an institution specializing in land and related matters launched a capacity-building program in the area. The focus of the initiative was to empower rice-farming communities (rice being the district\u0026rsquo;s main economic activity) to convert rice husks into clean energy. However, during the sessions, a different need began to surface. Community members expressed a strong interest in securing legal land ownership. They were keen to obtain land titles that would enable them to access bank loans, invest further in agriculture, and reduce tensions related to land use and ownership. As this demand grew louder, people in the area began organizing meetings and appealed to Ardhi University to help them formalize their land rights (ARU, Annual Mbarali Regularization Report, 2024).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRecognizing that land regularization falls under the jurisdiction of local planning authorities as outlined in Tanzania\u0026rsquo;s Urban Planning Act of 2007; Ardhi University advised the communities to engage with the Mbarali District Council. Eventually, community members from eight areas of Madibira, Ubaruku, Rujewa, Lugelele, Mapogoro, Igurusi, and Kongolo Mswiswi reached an agreement with the District Council and formally invited Ardhi University to carry out the regularization work. Community members contributed funds to support the initiative. With these contributions, landowners had their plots identified, planned, and surveyed, and many ultimately received formal land titles.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn 2022, the Tanzanian government, through the Ministry for Lands, Housing, and Human Settlements Development (MLHHSD), stepped in to support the ongoing work. It provided a loan to the project under the \u0026ldquo;Planning, Surveying, and Titling Program\u0026rdquo; (locally known as \u003cem\u003eKupanga, Kupima na Kumilikisha \u0026ndash; KKK\u003c/em\u003e). This financial support was intended to be repaid through contributions from landowners. Through this phase of the project, a total of 30,700 plots were successfully identified, planned, and surveyed. Building on this progress, the World Bank, in partnership with the Ministry, launched another project in 2025 namely the Land Tenure Improvement Plan (LTIP). The LTIP aimed to assist landowners who had been left out during the previous phases, ensuring their land was also surveyed and titled. The current study focuses specifically on respondents who were covered during the first two phases of the project, before the implementation of LTIP.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eImproved perceptions of land ownership\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOne of the most immediate and tangible changes brought about by the land regularization project in Mbarali\u0026rsquo;s peri-urban settlements was a profound sense of security and confidence in land ownership. Across all eight study sites of Madibira, Ubaruku, Rujewa, Lugelele, Mapogoro, Igurusi, and Kongolo Mswiswi, community members described how the process of being formally recognized as landowners had shifted both their mindset and their actions. For many, this was the first time they felt that the land they occupied has been truly recognised and recorded.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Igurusi, for example, several households (whose their sons are working in Dar es Salaam) had begun upgrading their shelters from mud-and-thatch to brick and cement structures. A middle-aged man proudly showed the research team the foundation for a new three-room house that his son who is working in Dar es Salaam was building. The psychological shift was also visible in how people spoke about planning for the future. In Rujewa, two young couples expressed aspirations to build rental rooms and establish home gardens, now that their land status had been clarified. One young father explained in an interview that the land (certificate of occupancy) was now regarded as a bank as this made them to focus on long term investments that may be supported by bank loan using the certificates.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDespite the overwhelmingly positive reception, not all experiences were seamless. Some community members in Ubaruku and Lugelele voiced frustration over delays in receiving their physical certificates, noting that the process between verification, mapping, surveying and final issuance sometimes felt too long. Nevertheless, even without holding the document in hand, many participants said they already felt a shift in how they were treated by neighbors and local leaders, with land disputes becoming fewer and easier to resolve. Therefore, the regularization process did more than distribute land titles but also transformed the way people perceived their land, their rights, and their future. It reduced fear, encouraged investment, and sparked a new sense of belonging. As one respondent in Madibira summed it up:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhen the government came to our village with this project, it was like they told us; we see you, we recognize you. That changes everything.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eReduction in land conflicts and disputes\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eOne of the most widely acknowledged impacts of the land regularization project was the noticeable reduction in land conflicts, particularly disputes related to boundaries and inheritance. Across all eight peri-urban areas of Madibira, Utengule, Ubaruku, Rujewa, Lugelele, Mapogoro, Igurusi, and Kongolo Mswiswi, community members consistently reported that tensions over land had significantly diminished after plots were demarcated, mapped, and legally documented. They further explained that, before regularization, unclear boundaries and verbal agreements had fueled frequent disagreements, especially between neighbors and within extended families. In Rujewa, one elderly man explained that in the past, they used sticks or trees to show where their land ended. Then someone would cut the tree, and initiate the fighting. That the presence of beacons made everyone to knows his/her place. This clarity brought not only legal security but also emotional relief. Respondents spoke of being able to walk around their plots without anxiety or the constant need to defend their claims.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntra-family disputes especially over inheritance were another common source of tension prior to regularization. One woman in Lugelele explained that disputes over who had the right to land after a father\u0026rsquo;s death were frequent, sometimes leading to long-standing family divisions. However, the official documentation of land ownership helped to settle such matters in advance. This sense of stability was echoed by one young men in Ubaruku, who noted that the certificates had become a kind of family archive and evidence of agreements that could no longer be rewritten out of convenience or power struggles. Several respondents highlighted that this had brought a new level of calm during otherwise tense family discussions, particularly around divorce or succession.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, some persistent issues remained. In households where land was registered solely in the husband\u0026rsquo;s name, widows and children often found themselves vulnerable, especially in the event of the husband's death. In Kongolo Mswiswi, one widow recounted how her in-laws began to claim her late husband\u0026rsquo;s land despite the fact she had lived on it for over twenty years.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis highlighted the continuing need for gender-sensitive approaches to land titling and deeper community education on legal inheritance rights. In some few cases, there were also isolated cases of confusion during the verification process such as misregistered names which occasionally led to new conflicts. These cases, however, were relatively few and were often resolved through follow-up by local leaders and regularization committees.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn addition, one youth in Madibira noted that regularization had prevented land grabbing by older relatives.\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSome uncles used to just take land, saying you\u0026rsquo;re too young to own it. Now if the title is in your name, even if you\u0026rsquo;re 19, it\u0026rsquo;s yours.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis indicates that regularization also created a protective buffer for younger generations, giving them more autonomy over inherited property. The findings demonstrate that land regularization has not only resolved many longstanding disputes but has also created a foundation for more peaceful, predictable, and just land governance at the household and community levels.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eEnhancement of gender-inclusive land ownership\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnother transformative impact of the land regularization process in Mbarali District was its gradual but meaningful contribution to enhancing gender-inclusive land ownership. Across the eight peri-urban settlements, the project\u0026rsquo;s emphasis on awareness raising and community dialogue helped bring gender equity into everyday conversations about land rights. While gender-inclusive land titling was not yet the norm everywhere, several encouraging examples showed how attitudes were beginning to shift, particularly in Madibira, Mapogoro, and Igurusi.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Madibira, findings from focus group discussions with women\u0026rsquo;s groups revealed a strong impact of the sensitization meetings and advocacy campaigns on shifting perceptions around marital land rights. Messages promoting joint ownership between spouses were not only repeatedly emphasized throughout the implementation process but were also widely accepted and internalized by many families. These messages challenged existing norms and created new expectations around equality in land rights within households. The influence of these campaigns was particularly visible in how women articulated a newfound sense of legitimacy and recognition, especially when their names appeared alongside their husbands\u0026rsquo; on land titles. This transformation was not only legal but also emotional as women (in FGDs) felt a deeper sense of dignity and visibility in their own homes and communities.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Mapogoro, ward leaders and community development officers played a proactive role in reinforcing these messages even after the official regularization activities were completed. They held follow-up meetings and encouraged families to reflect on joint ownership, framing it as both a legal safeguard and a gesture of mutual respect within marriage. This continuous engagement helped bridge the gap between formal policy and everyday family decisions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study also found that these changes were more easily embraced among younger couples. In areas like Igurusi, many younger men openly supported the idea of including their wives on title documents, especially in cases where both partners had contributed to acquiring or developing the land. This generational shift toward shared decision-making and equality appeared to reflect broader changes in how relationships are evolving in peri-urban communities. The findings suggest that the regularization project, when paired with consistent gender messaging and local follow-up, has had a meaningful impact on shifting social norms. The promotion of joint ownership was not just a technical recommendation but became a tool for fostering fairness, family dialogue, and greater gender equity in land relations, as one woman explained in an interview;\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\"When both our names are on the land, it\u0026rsquo;s not just about ownership; it\u0026rsquo;s about respect, partnership, and showing our children what equality looks like at home.\"\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, the findings were not equal in all areas. In some cases, women reported attempting to negotiate joint ownership but being denied by their spouses. In Lugelele, a widow explained that she had asked her late husband to include her name on the title, but he refused, saying that land is for men. After his death, her in-laws attempted to claim the plot, leaving her in a vulnerable position until he was assisted by the social welfare office of Mbarali District.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eProtection and recognition of public and community spaces\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOne of the significant yet often overlooked impacts of the informal settlement land regularization process in Mbarali District was its role in identifying, protecting, and reinforcing the collective value of public land. In several of the eight peri-urban settlements particularly in Igurusi, Rujewa, and Madibira, respondents reported that the mapping of public spaces during the regularisation process fundamentally changed how they viewed and treated shared land. Spaces allocated for schools, markets, health dispensaries, playgrounds, and open gathering areas were no longer seen as idle or available for individual use. Instead, they became clearly understood as communal assets meant to benefit all community members.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe visible and formal allocation of public land fostered a sense of collective responsibility and pride. Youth groups in Rujewa, for example, began organizing sports and social activities on newly recognized public fields, while in Madibira; women\u0026rsquo;s groups initiated grassroots environmental efforts by planting trees and planning community rest areas. These actions emerged organically without donor support once the land\u0026rsquo;s communal purpose was understood and its security affirmed by the mapping process. Such examples highlight how public land, when clearly marked and communicated, can become a focal point for self-driven community development.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Mswiswi, regularization also led to greater respect for public boundaries. Local leaders recalled how informal vendors who had previously occupied parts of a planned market area voluntarily vacated once the layout was publicly shared and explained, recognizing the space was reserved for community businesses. However, the process also exposed gaps in governance and enforcement. In Lugelele, community members expressed frustration when a public plot intended for a future market was quietly fenced off by a well-connected private individual. Although the land had been clearly earmarked during the regularization process, the lack of swift enforcement left the community unsure of its fate. A similar scenario unfolded in Ubaruku, where youth reported that land designated for a football field was being encroached upon by private development interests.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e While the regularization process created clarity and community goodwill, the findings reveal that sustained benefit relies heavily on post-mapping enforcement, vigilant local leadership, and continued public engagement. Without these, the findings have shown that mapped public spaces remain vulnerable to elite capture or informal privatization undermining the community trust and cooperation that regularization seeks to build. One respondent in Rujewa during an interview captured the emotional significance of this shift in public land perception, he narrated that:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe used to think any open space was for taking. But now we know this field belongs to everyone; it\u0026rsquo;s for sports, for events. We now protect it.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis quotation reflect a deeper cultural transformation whereby community members no longer see public land as empty or up for grabs, but as a shared inheritance requiring collective care and stewardship.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eSocio-economic empowerment and investment confidence\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eA compelling theme that emerged from the study was the noticeable rise in socio-economic empowerment and investment confidence following the land regularization process. Across multiple project areas particularly in Kongolo Mswiswi, Ubaruku, and Igurusi community members reported that gaining legal recognition of their plots had fundamentally shifted how they viewed and used their land. No longer just a space for shelter, land became an economic asset that opened up new opportunities for financial planning, credit access, and small-scale entrepreneurship.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Kongolo Mswiswi, Village Community Bank (VICOBA) groups reported increased confidence in lending activities. Members felt more secure offering larger loans because borrowers could now present official land documents as a form of trust. This shift encouraged more active financial participation among community members, especially women, who used their land titles to access credit and expand small businesses like tailoring, food vending, and poultry keeping. In Ubaruku, the data reflected a growing tendency among youth to invest in long-term income-generating activities connected with rice farming. Some had built rental rooms on their plots, others had started backyard farming or brick making, and many expressed that their land now symbolized a reliable source of future stability.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Igurusi, a group of widows collectively developed a vegetable garden on land they collectively owned and secured a title through the regularization exercise that was used to get a loan worth Tshs twenty million. With newfound legal protection and loan at hand, they confidently collaborated with a local Non-Government Organisation to access irrigation tools and seed support. The garden quickly became both a steady income source and a symbol of independence for the women involved as they used to sell the produce to big hotels in Mbeya Region. Their experience illustrated how legal land ownership, when paired with community organization and modest support, could significantly enhance the livelihoods of marginalized groups.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, the economic benefits were not uniformly felt. In areas like Mapogoro and Lugelele, some respondents reported that while the land title brought peace of mind, it did not immediately improve their financial status. Some of them struggled to leverage their certificate of title for income because of poor financial information and knowledge associated with available loaning opportunities. Their experiences highlighted the need for post-regularization support such as microcredit access, training, and cooperative-based programs to ensure that the economic potential of land tenure security is realized equitably across different groups and individuals.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOverall, the findings showed that land regularization helped trigger a psychological shift from insecurity to aspiration as community members began to take initiative, seek credit, and invest in small ventures, laying a foundation for greater economic resilience. Yet, the study also affirmed that tenure security alone is not enough but its full potential depends on whether complementary social and financial systems are in place, particularly for the most vulnerable. As one woman in Lugelele poignantly put it,\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eI have the title, yes, but I still struggle to get financial support as the same is designed for the educated ones only. However, now I feel safe enough to hope.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eEmergence of spatial literacy and civic participation\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e One of the most quietly transformative impacts of the land regularization process in the eight peri-urban settlements was the emergence of spatial literacy and a significant rise in civic participation. In areas such as Madibira, Igurusi, Mapogoro, Lugelele, Mapogoro and Rujewa, community members developed a practical understanding of planning maps that were once seen as exclusive to government officials and external experts. Respondents across the eight study settlements demonstrated a new awareness of spatial planning concepts such as plot numbering, road reserves, space contribution for community infrastructures, waterway buffers, and public spaces. Many community members began referring to their plot numbers and neighborhood layouts as part of routine conversations, and maps displayed in village offices were actively consulted. Women\u0026rsquo;s groups in Rujewa used these planning tools to advocate for improvements such as the preservation of pedestrian walkways and the installation of water points near high-density households.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Madibira, for instance, community members collectively opposed a planning proposal to relocate a market into a flood-prone zone, an objection grounded in their new understanding of the settlement\u0026rsquo;s layout. In Kongolo Mswiswi, bodaboda drivers acted on their knowledge of zoning by raising concerns about illegal structures that encroached on planned roads, and even reported violations to local authorities. In Lugelele, young people used layout maps to advocate for footpath improvements, while in Mapogoro, women who had never attended public meetings began participating after realizing the direct link between land decisions and household welfare. This rising civic engagement marked a shift from passive expectation to proactive involvement.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese developments signaled more than a transfer of technical knowledge but marked a shift in how community members saw themselves in relation to their communities. Where previously people might have accepted changes passively or felt excluded from planning decisions, they now engaged critically and constructively. Spatial knowledge turned into civic power. The ability to read a map became a gateway to dialogue, advocacy, and accountability. One respondent in Igurusi expressed that,\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe used to say planning is not for us. Now I know where my plot is, where the roads go, and where the river buffer starts. I can even explain it to my children.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis words captures the broader transformation witnessed across the eight settlements from the citizens who once felt disconnected from land governance to empowered citizens participating in the future of their neighborhoods. This shift represents one of the most enduring and meaningful impacts of the regularization process.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eEmergence of local land knowledge brokers\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eAnother subtle yet transformative impact of the land regularization initiative was the emergence of local land knowledge brokers. These are community members who, without official designation, became informal experts in interpreting land maps, boundary layouts, and the procedural steps needed to obtain or correct land documentation or title. These individuals often emerged organically through consistent participation in sensitization meetings, better literacy, or previous experience with community leadership or members of the regularisation committee. Over time, they evolved into trusted local intermediaries, helping to bridge the gap between technical land information and everyday understanding.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Rujewa, for instance, one mason gained local prominence for his ability to read and interpret the settlement layout map. He had attended nearly every village-level mapping meeting and made it a personal mission to carry a printed copy of the map with him. It was narrated that, even the village chairperson asks him when there is a dispute. He usually walks around with a copy of the layout and explains it to elders who cannot read well. His informal role became essential not only in clarifying boundaries but also in easing tensions and correcting misunderstandings before they escalated into formal disputes.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSimilar roles emerged in other peri-urban areas. In Mapogoro, a retired teacher was described as \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;the one who knows the map like the back of his hand.\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e Community members frequently visit him to ask for clarification about their plot number, where to go for document updates, or how to report an encroachment issue. In Ubaruku, two women from a local VICOBA group who had attended regularization trainings became important resources, especially for other women seeking help to register their land jointly with spouses or resolve titling errors.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese informal knowledge brokers played a crucial role in deepening the reach and sustainability of the regularization project. By localizing technical knowledge, they helped ensure that maps, documents, and land-use plans were not just government artifacts but became living tools within the community. More importantly, their emergence signaled a shift in local leadership dynamics by introducing new roles based not on formal authority, but on access to knowledge and willingness to assist others. In Lugelele, one young man who frequently helped neighbors interpret boundary lines joked in an interview as he narrated;\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eI am not a planner, but people now call me \u0026lsquo;mtaalamu wa mipaka\u0026rsquo; (the boundary expert).\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eShifts in inheritance practices and intergenerational dialogue\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe process of land regularization in peri-urban Mbarali has not only secured land rights but also it has reshaped the way families think about, discuss, and plan inheritance. Where succession was once guided by unwritten customs, often quiet, male-dominated, and delayed until after death, the introduction of formal land titles has brought inheritance into the open, making it a practical and inclusive matter that families can no longer ignore. Before regularization, inheritance was largely managed informally. Land would typically be passed down to sons, with daughters rarely included in decision-making. These transfers often occurred after the death of a parent, leading to confusion, resentment, and in some cases, long-term family disputes. In interviews with elders, many of them admitted to have avoided talking about inheritance out of discomfort, fear of offending relatives, or a belief that such discussions were premature or disrespectful.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, as land regularization efforts led to the issuance of the granted right of occupancy, households were confronted with the need to name a legal landholder. This requirement, although administrative on the surface, prompted a profound cultural shift. Families began having open conversations about who would inherit the land and how it would be used in the future. Across all study sites, elders, parents, and even young adults described how the physical existence of a land document gave them a reason, and a responsibility to talk. These conversations, once taboo, became acts of family care and planning. In multiple households, daughters were included for the first time in succession plans.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Madibira, for instance, some fathers explicitly revised their plans to ensure fairness across all children. In other areas like Mapogoro and Mswiswi, shared usage plans were introduced, especially where land sizes were limited and family sizes were large. In one particularly striking case, a 68-year-old farmer in Ubaruku described how regularization changed his view of his daughters' rights. Though traditionally he would have passed land only to his sons, the process of registering his land led to deeper reflection. He shared:\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eBefore, I would have left it to the boys and said nothing. But when I saw my name on the title, I thought this land came from my hands, but their lives depend on it. I called all my children. We sat under the mango tree, and I told them: \u0026lsquo;We will write it together. So that when I go, no one cries with anger.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis moment, echoed in different forms across the eight study areas, illustrates how legal recognition gave space for emotional honesty, inclusion, and future-facing decisions. Families who had never openly discussed succession were now drafting informal agreements, sometimes witnessed by local leaders or land officers. Importantly, while some elders still approached the topic with caution, the presence of the land certificate gave them a neutral reason to raise it, not as a sign of impending death, but as a matter of legal and family duty. The study found that this shift reduced the emotional burden of inheritance planning, created transparency among heirs, and, in many households, strengthened trust between generations.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eGrowing awareness of environmental boundaries\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study revealed a meaningful shift in environmental consciousness among community members of the regularized peri-urban settlements, particularly concerning ecological boundaries like river buffers, wetlands, and forest reserves. In areas such as Madibira, Igurusi, and Rujewa, what was once seen as unused or available land gradually came to be understood as vital environmental zones requiring protection. This transformation was largely the result of participatory mapping and community sensitization activities, which clarified land use classifications and educated community members about the purpose of protected areas. As a result, there was a noticeable behavioral change, especially among youth groups and community leaders, who began initiating conservation activities such as riverbank clean-ups and erosion control measures using vetiver grass in Madibira. Community members also began referencing mapped boundaries in public discussions to challenge environmentally harmful practices, marking a move from passive coexistence with nature to active stewardship.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMost notably, this awareness fostered a strong sense of community responsibility and informal enforcement of environmental norms. In several cases, local individuals independently monitored and intervened when they noticed encroachments into protected zones. For instance, in Lugelele, community members halted the illegal expansion of a maize farm into a designated river Mbarali buffer, demonstrating a grassroots commitment to sustainable land use. This peer-driven accountability was not imposed by external authorities but emerged organically through shared understanding and localized action. In an interview, one respondent from Madibira narrated as follows;\u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eWe didn\u0026rsquo;t know that the swamp near us is a protected area. Now we do not farm there. We even warn newcomers.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe findings from the study on informal settlement land regularization in Mbarali District reveal a complex and multi-layered set of transformations that extend beyond formal land tenure security into deeper dimensions of social, economic, and spatial justice. Anchored in the Transformative Land Governance Framework (TLGF), this discussion explores how the regularization process not only facilitated access to formal land rights but also acted as a catalyst for broader community empowerment, gender equity, institutional legitimacy, and spatial restructuring. The TLGF emphasizes inclusive, transparent, and context-sensitive land governance as a foundation for sustainable development (Enemark et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Palmer et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003eb), and this study offers strong evidence of its practical relevance in the peri-urban Tanzanian context.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eA core component of the TLGF is the promotion of land tenure security as a vehicle for social transformation. In Mbarali, the study found that land regularization generated a psychological shift among community members from a state of uncertainty and invisibility to one of recognition and confidence. This transition aligns with literature emphasizing the symbolic power of legal recognition in reshaping individual and collective identities (Hall et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). The feeling of being \u003cem\u003e\u0026ldquo;seen\u0026rdquo;\u003c/em\u003e by the state, as echoed in participants\u0026rsquo; narratives, affirms the importance of emotional and psychological dimensions of land governance, often overlooked in technocratic interventions (Lombard \u0026amp; Rakodi, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMoreover, the findings suggest that land tenure security enabled investment confidence and socio-economic empowerment which are key outcomes anticipated in the TLGF. As land became a secure and tradable asset, communities began to reimagine its value not just as shelter but also as capital. This mirrors global evidence that land regularization can unlock economic opportunities, particularly for the poor, when backed by legal certainty and access to markets (Byamugisha, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e; K. Deininger \u0026amp; Feder, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). In the Mbarali case, youth and women used certificates to access credit or initiate small-scale enterprises. Yet, as studies from other African contexts have noted, the transformative potential of land tenure security remains conditional on the presence of complementary services, such as credit facilities, extension support, and legal aid (K. Deininger \u0026amp; Feder, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). The partial realization of economic benefits in Mapogoro and Lugelele, therefore, signals the need for a systemic, cross-sectoral approach that links tenure reform with financial inclusion, capacity building, and market access.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe reduction in land-related conflicts reported in all eight settlements affirms TLGF\u0026rsquo;s assertion that clarity of land rights and inclusive documentation mechanisms are essential for sustainable peace and justice. Prior to regularization, the ambiguity of customary or informal arrangements had frequently sparked disputes over boundaries, inheritance, and gendered access to land. The introduction of official boundaries and documented titles curtailed these tensions, as found in similar contexts like Rwanda and Ethiopia (K. W. Deininger, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). However, gender-specific vulnerabilities such as exclusion of women from certificates and intra-family succession battles persisted in some areas, revealing the limits of legal reform without deliberate social transformation (Makota, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018a\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eGender-inclusive land ownership emerged as one of the most promising, yet fragile, impacts of the regularization process. The inclusion of women\u0026rsquo;s names on titles, particularly among younger couples, marked a notable shift in social norms and intra-household power dynamics. These findings echo global trends that link joint titling with improved bargaining power for women and more stable household investments (Daley \u0026amp; Englert, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010b\u003c/span\u003e). However, the resistance faced by women in areas like Lugelele reflects persistent patriarchal norms that hinder gender-equitable land governance. According to Makota, (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018a\u003c/span\u003e), securing women\u0026rsquo;s land rights requires not only legal reform but also continuous public education, institutional responsiveness, and gender mainstreaming within land administration. The proactive role of ward leaders and women\u0026rsquo;s officers in Mapogoro illustrates the potential of community-level actors in bridging formal frameworks with everyday gender realities.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOne of the most profound yet underexplored impacts of the regularization process was the recognition and safeguarding of public and communal spaces. The TLGF emphasizes that just land governance must not only serve individual property rights but also protect collective interests and future generations (Borras Jr \u0026amp; Franco, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). In Igurusi, Rujewa, and Madibira, formal mapping and demarcation of public land created a renewed sense of shared ownership, stewardship, and civic pride. This transformation of perception from viewing open spaces as unclaimed land to recognizing them as community assets aligns with empirical studies showing how spatial planning can enhance local democracy and collective agency (Kombe \u0026amp; Kreibich, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000a\u003c/span\u003e). However, the emerging threats of elite capture, as seen in Ubaruku and Lugelele, point to the fragility of public land governance in the absence of vigilant enforcement, robust legal safeguards, and institutional transparency (Bugri \u0026amp; Yuonayel, 2015).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eImportantly, the study revealed that land regularization fostered a sense of citizenship and political belonging among community members who had long felt marginalized by state structures. This aligns with TLGF\u0026rsquo;s view of land as a platform for constructing inclusive citizenship and enhancing state-society relations (Borras Jr \u0026amp; Franco, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). In Mbarali, formal recognition through land titles translated into increased participation in village meetings, demand for services, and greater trust in local institutions. These shifts demonstrate that land governance is not merely a technical activity but a deeply political process that reconfigures power relations and redefines the social contract (Lund, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFurthermore, another striking impact relates to the emergence of spatial literacy among community members, which sparked a significant rise in civic participation. The regularization process introduced community members to spatial planning concepts previously seen as the exclusive domain of government officials or experts such as plot numbering, road reserves, and buffer zones. This democratization of spatial knowledge echoes calls by scholars for bottom-up empowerment through land literacy, enabling citizens to become active interlocutors in land governance rather than passive subjects (Chamberlain, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e). The ability of community members to read and reference maps in everyday discourse and advocacy illustrates a profound shift in how community members perceive their role within the spatial order of their settlements. Such spatial literacy is a foundational element of transformative governance, as it allows individuals to understand and negotiate land rights, infrastructure development, and public space protection (Kombe \u0026amp; Kreibich, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000b\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMoreover, the uptake of spatial knowledge translated directly into increased community activism and collective action. The case where Madibira community members successfully opposed relocating a market to a flood-prone area, or where bodaboda drivers in Kongolo Mswiswi reported zoning violations, exemplify how spatial awareness catalyzes accountability and contestation against potentially harmful planning decisions (Stein et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). These examples resonate with the broader literature emphasizing that land governance must be participatory and responsive to local actors to be truly transformative. Importantly, this enhanced civic engagement is not merely reactive but represents a shift from passive expectation to proactive involvement, signaling growing citizen confidence and the embedding of spatial knowledge as civic power.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eClosely linked to this phenomenon was the emergence of local land knowledge brokers, informal yet pivotal figures within communities who became trusted interpreters of land documentation and procedural processes. The rise of these brokers reflects a crucial localization of land governance that TLGF highlights where transformation is not imposed top-down but co-created with communities through new social roles that transcend formal authority (Borras Jr \u0026amp; Franco, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Lund, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). These brokers bridged the gap between technical land administration and everyday understanding, facilitating conflict resolution, documentation updates, and wider awareness. This aligns with the idea that effective governance depends on hybrid institutional arrangements combining formal rules with informal practices and local expertise (Boone, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e; Chigbu, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). In Mbarali, the informal experts whether masons, retired teachers, or women leaders embodied a democratization of land knowledge and helped sustain the regularization project\u0026rsquo;s impact beyond official activities. This suggests that transformative land governance should actively nurture and integrate such community-based knowledge intermediaries to enhance legitimacy and trust (Nuhu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023b\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study also reveals how regularization catalyzed important shifts in inheritance practices and intergenerational dialogue. The formalization of land rights encouraged families to move from oral, informal succession traditions towards documented, inclusive planning involving multiple heirs, including daughters. This is a significant departure from customary land norms in many Tanzanian contexts, where inheritance is often male-dominated and shrouded in silence (Chimhowu, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). By providing a legal basis and social legitimacy for succession discussions, the process helped reduce uncertainty and conflict, fostering fairness and predictability for future generations. Such developments echo recent scholarship emphasizing the role of formal land rights in promoting gender equity and peaceful intergenerational transitions (Lusasi \u0026amp; Mwaseba, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Yet the persistence of cultural reticence and some elders\u0026rsquo; discomfort highlights that legal reform alone is insufficient; ongoing sensitization and culturally attuned strategies are needed to embed these positive changes sustainably (Lusasi \u0026amp; Mwaseba, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Makota, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018b\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFurthermore, the study highlights a growing environmental consciousness, notably regarding the protection of ecological boundaries such as wetlands, river buffers, and forest reserves. Participatory mapping and sensitization activities raised awareness about the critical ecological functions of these areas and encouraged community-led conservation efforts such as riverbank clean-ups and erosion control using vetiver grass. This grassroots environmental stewardship is consistent with TLGF\u0026rsquo;s insistence that land governance must safeguard natural resources as common goods for current and future generations (Enemark et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Moreover, informal peer monitoring and enforcement of environmental norms exemplified by the community\u0026rsquo;s prevention of illegal maize farming in buffer zones demonstrate a community-driven compliance model that external authorities often struggle to achieve (Stein et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). These findings reinforce the potential for land regularization to serve as an entry point for integrated land-use planning and sustainable environmental management, especially when communities are empowered as active custodians rather than passive beneficiaries (De Vries et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e; Usika et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTogether, these interconnected findings demonstrate that land regularization in Mbarali does more than confer legal ownership; it reconfigures power relations, social identities, and environmental practices in ways that resonate with the transformative ambitions of the TLGF. It shifts the citizen-state relationship from one of exclusion and passivity to one characterized by dialogue, shared responsibility, and accountability. This echoes broader global calls to view land governance not as a technocratic exercise but as a socio-political process grounded in equity, inclusion, and sustainability (Borras \u0026amp; Franco, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e; Palmer et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003eb). Furthermore, the emergence of localized leadership based on knowledge rather than formal status reflects a democratic deepening, where authority is earned through service and competence, not merely position (Lund, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, the study also highlights several challenges and limitations that temper the transformative potential. Delays in issuing formal certificates risked undermining trust and dampening momentum, a problem widely reported in land regularization literature (Chimhowu, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Errors in documentation and occasional exclusion of women from titles pose risks to social justice and could ignite conflicts if unaddressed. These challenges emphasize the need for robust, gender-sensitive institutional capacity, efficient grievance mechanisms, and continuous community engagement to sustain transformative gains. Moreover, the persistence of cultural norms resistant to joint titling and open inheritance discussions indicates that land governance reforms must be complemented by long-term social change efforts to embed new norms around equity and inclusion (Makota, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018a\u003c/span\u003e; Msangi et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, this study enriches the evidence base supporting the Transformative Land Governance Framework by demonstrating how informal settlement regularization can act as a catalyst for multi-dimensional community transformation in peri-urban Tanzania. The process generated new forms of spatial literacy, fostered active citizenship, nurtured local knowledge brokers, reshaped inheritance practices, and enhanced environmental stewardship each reinforcing the others in a virtuous cycle of empowerment and justice. To fully realize this potential, land regularization initiatives must be designed and implemented with an explicit focus on social inclusion, institutional capacity-building and continuous dialogue with communities.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflict of Interest\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declares no conflict of interest related to this study.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding Information\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe study was not funded\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe author actively involved in all stages of the study. He conceptualized the research, designed the methodology, and carried out fieldwork. The author analyzed the data, discussed the findings, and wrote the manuscript alone. The author reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript before submission.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical Statement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study was carried out in line with established ethical research standards. Before any fieldwork began, ethical clearance was formally approved by the Ethical Clearance Committee of the School of Spatial Planning and Social Science at Ardhi University. In addition, all necessary permissions were obtained from local government authorities in Mbarali District. Everyone who took part in the study, whether in focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, or through participant observation was fully informed about the purpose of the research and gave their voluntary consent to participate. Every effort was made to protect the privacy, dignity, and confidentiality of all participants throughout the research process.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmanor, K. (2012). \u003cem\u003eLand governance in Africa: How historical context has shaped key contemporary issues\u003c/em\u003e. International Land Coalition. https://www.landcoalition.org/en/resources/land-governance-in-africa/\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAndreasen, M. H., McGranahan, G., Kyessi, A., \u0026amp; Kombe, W. (2020a). Informal land investments and wealth accumulation in the context of regularization: Case studies from Dar es Salaam and Mwanza. \u003cem\u003eEnvironment and Urbanization\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e32\u003c/em\u003e(1), 89\u0026ndash;108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247819896265\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAndreasen, M. H., McGranahan, G., Kyessi, A., \u0026amp; Kombe, W. (2020b). Informal land investments and wealth accumulation in the context of regularization: Case studies from Dar es Salaam and Mwanza. \u003cem\u003eEnvironment and Urbanization\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e32\u003c/em\u003e(1), 89\u0026ndash;108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247819896265\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBoone, C. (2014). \u003cem\u003eProperty and political order in Africa: Land rights and the structure of politics\u003c/em\u003e. Cambridge University Press. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBorras Jr, S. M., \u0026amp; Franco, J. C. (2010). Contemporary Discourses and Contestations around Pro‐Poor Land Policies and Land Governance. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Agrarian Change\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e10\u003c/em\u003e(1), 1\u0026ndash;32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00243.x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBryman, A. (2016). \u003cem\u003eSocial research methods\u003c/em\u003e. Oxford university press. Bugri, J. T., \u0026amp; Yuonayel,\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eE. M. (2015). Traditional authorities and peri-urban land management in Ghana: Evidence from Wa. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Resources Development and Management\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e13\u003c/em\u003e(9), 68\u0026ndash;79. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eByamugisha, F. F. (2013). \u003cem\u003eSecuring Africa\u0026rsquo;s land for shared prosperity: A program to scale up reforms and investments\u003c/em\u003e. World Bank Publications.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChamberlain, W. (2025). \u003cem\u003eTenure security for sustainable livelihoods\u003c/em\u003e. FAO. https://www.fao.org/tenure-security \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChigbu, U. E. (2021). Institutional success factors in spatial planning for socioeconomically and ecologically sustainable peri-urban Ethiopia: Insights from Rwanda and Tanzania. \u003cem\u003eLand Use Policy, 101\u003c/em\u003e, 105141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105141\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChigbu, U. E., Schopf, A., De Vries, W. T., Masum, F., Mabikke, S., Antonio, D., \u0026amp; Espinoza, J. (2017). Combining land-use planning and tenure security: A tenure responsive land-use planning approach for developing countries. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Environmental Planning and Management\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e60\u003c/em\u003e(9), 1622\u0026ndash;1639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1245655\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChimhowu, A. (2019). The \u0026lsquo;new\u0026rsquo;African customary land tenure. Characteristic, features and policy implications of a new paradigm. \u003cem\u003eLand Use Policy\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e81\u003c/em\u003e, 897\u0026ndash;903. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaley, E., \u0026amp; Englert, B. (2010a). Securing land rights for women. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Eastern African Studies\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e4\u003c/em\u003e(1), 91\u0026ndash;113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531050903556675\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaley, E., \u0026amp; Englert, B. (2010b). Securing land rights for women. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Eastern African Studies\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e4\u003c/em\u003e(1), 91\u0026ndash;113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17531050903556675\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDe Vries, W. T., Bugri, J. T., \u0026amp; Mandhu, F. (2020). \u003cem\u003eResponsible and smart land management interventions: An African context\u003c/em\u003e. CRC Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDeininger, K., \u0026amp; Feder, G. (2009). Land registration, governance, and development: Evidence and implications for policy. \u003cem\u003eThe World Bank Research Observer\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e24\u003c/em\u003e(2), 233\u0026ndash;266. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDeininger, K. W. (2025). \u003cem\u003eInnovations in land rights recognition, administration, and governance\u003c/em\u003e. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9578-1\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDenzin, N. K., \u0026amp; Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). \u003cem\u003eThe SAGE handbook of qualitative research\u003c/em\u003e (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDodgson, J. E. (2017). About Research: Qualitative Methodologies. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Human Lactation\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e33\u003c/em\u003e(2), 355\u0026ndash;358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334417698693\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDurand-Lasserve, A., \u0026amp; Royston, L. (Eds.). (2002). \u003cem\u003eHolding their ground: Secure land tenure for the urban poor in developing countries\u003c/em\u003e. Earthscan Publications.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEnemark, S., McLaren, R., Lemmen, C., Antonio, D., \u0026amp; Gitau, J. (2016). A guide for building fit-for-purpose land administration systems in less developed countries: Capacity development, change management and project delivery. \u003cem\u003eScaling up Responsible Land Governance: Proceedings of the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, 14-18 March 2016, Washington DC, United States\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;21. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFimbo, G. M. (2004). \u003cem\u003eLand law reforms in Tanzania\u003c/em\u003e. Dar es Salaam University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHall, R., Edelman, M., Borras, S. M., Scoones, I., White, B., \u0026amp; Wolford, W. (2017). Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions \u0026lsquo;from below.\u0026rsquo; In \u003cem\u003eGlobal land grabbing and political reactions\u0026rsquo; from below\u0026rsquo;\u003c/em\u003e (pp. 1\u0026ndash;22). \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKabigi, B., Haule, K., \u0026amp; Kilonzo, R. (2024). The gendered land tenure security in Tanzania: Variations through Geo-demographic factors. \u003cem\u003eAfrican Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e7\u003c/em\u003e(4), 1197\u0026ndash;1213. https://revues.imist.ma/index.php/AJLP-GS/article/view/48274\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKamoleka, T. N., \u0026amp; Lucian, C. A. (2024). Evaluating Alternative Dispute Resolution in Resolving Land Conflicts in Ifakara, Tanzania. \u003cem\u003eAfrican Journal on Conflict Resolution\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e24\u003c/em\u003e(2), 29\u0026ndash;56. https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/ejc-accordr_v24_n2_a3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKironde, J. L. (2009). Improving land sector governance in Africa: The case of Tanzania. \u003cem\u003eWorkshop on \u0026ldquo;Land Governance in Support of the MDGs: Responding to New Challenges\u003c/em\u003e, 1\u0026ndash;29. https://landwise-production.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/2022/03/Kironde_Improving-land-sector-governance-in-Africa-case-of-Tanzania_2009-1.pdf\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKironde, J. M. L. (2019). Community-based settlements regularization: Lessons for scaling up from Makongo Juu informal settlement, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. \u003cem\u003eCurrent Urban Studies\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e7\u003c/em\u003e(02), 170. https://www.scirp.org/html/2-1150361_92934.htm\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKitosi, P., Mwipopo, D., Murro, G., Kimilo, A., \u0026amp; Kapinga, M. (2024). THE NATURE OF LAND CONFLICTS IN INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS: EXPERIENCE FROM REGUARIZATION PROJECTS, THE CASE OF DAR ES SALAM, TANZANIA. \u003cem\u003eAfrican Journal of Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e7\u003c/em\u003e(2), 555\u0026ndash;567. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/346025/\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. \u003cem\u003eBmj\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e311\u003c/em\u003e(7000), 299\u0026ndash;302. https://www.bmj.com/content/311/7000/299.short\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKombe, W. J., \u0026amp; Kreibich, V. (2000a). \u003cem\u003eInformal land management in Tanzania\u003c/em\u003e. SPRING Centre, Faculty of Spatial Plannning, University of Dortmund, Germany.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKombe, W. J., \u0026amp; Kreibich, V. (2000b). Reconciling informal and formal land management: An agenda for improving tenure security and urban governance in poor countries. \u003cem\u003eHabitat International\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e24\u003c/em\u003e(2), 231\u0026ndash;240. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397599000417\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKombe, W. J., \u0026amp; Kreibich, V. (2006). \u003cem\u003eGovernance of informal urbanisation in Tanzania\u003c/em\u003e. Mkuki na Nyota Publishers.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLombard, M., \u0026amp; Rakodi, C. (2016). Urban land conflict in the Global South: Towards an analytical framework. \u003cem\u003eUrban Studies\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e53\u003c/em\u003e(13), 2683\u0026ndash;2699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016659616\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLund, C. (2017). Rule and Rupture: State Formation through the Production of Property and Citizenship. In C. Lund \u0026amp; M. Eilenberg (Eds.), \u003cem\u003eRule and Rupture\u003c/em\u003e (1st ed., pp. 1\u0026ndash;29). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119384816.ch1\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLusasi, J., \u0026amp; Mwaseba, D. (2020). Gender inequality and symbolic violence in women\u0026rsquo;s access to family land in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. \u003cem\u003eLand\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e9\u003c/em\u003e(11), 468. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/11/468\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMagina, F. B., Kyessi, A., \u0026amp; Kombe, W. (2020). The urban land nexus\u0026ndash;challenges and opportunities of regularising informal settlements: The case studies of Dar es Salaam and Mwanza in Tanzania. \u003cem\u003eJournal of African Real Estate Research\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e5\u003c/em\u003e(1), 32\u0026ndash;54. https://journals.uct.ac.za/index.php/JARER/article/view/837\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMakota, N. N. (2018a). \u003cem\u003eImpact of Land Regularization on Empowerment of Women in Developing Countries: A Case of Urban Informal Settlements in Tanzania.\u003c/em\u003e [PhD Thesis, The Open University of Tanzania]. http://repository.out.ac.tz/id/eprint/2282\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMakota, N. N. (2018b). \u003cem\u003eImpact of Land Regularization on Empowerment of Women in Developing Countries: A Case of Urban Informal Settlements in Tanzania.\u003c/em\u003e [PhD Thesis, The Open University of Tanzania]. http://repository.out.ac.tz/id/eprint/2282\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMbilinyi, J., L. Kaswamila, A., \u0026amp; A. Assenga, E. (2023). Challenges of Land Regularization in Unplanned Peri-urban Settlements in Tanzania. \u003cem\u003eAfrican Journal of Development Studies (Formerly AFFRIKA Journal of Politics, Economics and Society)\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e13\u003c/em\u003e(2), 73\u0026ndash;99. https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3649/2023/v13n2a4\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMbilinyi, J., Kaswamila, A., \u0026amp; Assenga, E. (2022). Land Regularization and Its Impact on Household Livelihoods In Dar es Salaam and Mwanza Cities, Tanzania. \u003cem\u003eTanzania Journal for Population Studies and Development\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e29\u003c/em\u003e(2), 145\u0026ndash;164. https://tjpsd.udsm.ac.tz/index.php/tjpsd/article/view/179\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMsangi, H. A., Waized, B., L\u0026ouml;hr, K., Sieber, S., \u0026amp; Ndyetabula, D. W. (2023). Development outcomes of land tenure formalization under customary and statutory land tenure systems in Tanzania: A multinomial endogenous switching regression approach. \u003cem\u003eAgriculture \u0026amp; Food Security\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e11\u003c/em\u003e(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00403-3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNuhu, S. (2019). Peri-Urban Land Governance in Developing Countries: Understanding the Role, Interaction and Power Relation Among Actors in Tanzania. \u003cem\u003eUrban Forum\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e30\u003c/em\u003e(1), 1\u0026ndash;16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-018-9339-2\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNuhu, S., Munuo, N., \u0026amp; Mngumi, L. (2023a). Governance challenges of regularisation of informal settlements in peri-urban Tanzania: Perspectives from local stakeholders. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Urban Sustainable Development\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e15\u003c/em\u003e(1), 35\u0026ndash;47. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2023.2167821\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNuhu, S., Munuo, N., \u0026amp; Mngumi, L. (2023b). Governance challenges of regularisation of informal settlements in peri-urban Tanzania: Perspectives from local stakeholders. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Urban Sustainable Development\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e15\u003c/em\u003e(1), 35\u0026ndash;47. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2023.2167821\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePalmer, D., Fricska, S., \u0026amp; Wehrmann, B. (2009). \u003cem\u003eTowards improved land governance\u003c/em\u003e. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and UN-Habitat. https://gltn.net/download/towards-improved-land-governance/ \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePayne, G. (2001). Urban land tenure policy options: Titles or rights? \u003cem\u003eHabitat International\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e25\u003c/em\u003e(3), 415\u0026ndash;429. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStein, H., Odgaard, R., Askew, K., \u0026amp; Maganga, F. (2024). The World Bank and Rural Land Titling in Africa: The Case of Tanzania. \u003cem\u003eDevelopment and Change\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e55\u003c/em\u003e(6), 1150\u0026ndash;1181. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12866\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUbink, J. (2018). Customary Legal Empowerment in Namibia and Ghana? Lessons about Access, Power and Participation in Non‐state Justice Systems. \u003cem\u003eDevelopment and Change\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e49\u003c/em\u003e(4), 930\u0026ndash;950. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12415\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUsika, G., Urassa, J. K., \u0026amp; Kabote, S. (2024). Implication of Institutional Frameworks Governing Land Tenure Security in Social-Economic Dynamics: Experience from Iringa District in Tanzania. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Public Policy and Administration\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e9\u003c/em\u003e(1), 58\u0026ndash;79. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWankogere, S. D., \u0026amp; Alananga, S. S. (2020). Factors affecting land titling during regularization of informal settlements in Dar es Salaam Tanzania. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of Real Estate Studies\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e14\u003c/em\u003e(2), 73\u0026ndash;97.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhang, J., Shuang Chen, S., Gao, Q., Shen, Q., Kimirei, I. A., \u0026amp; Mapunda, D. W. (2020). Morphological characteristics of informal settlements and strategic suggestions for urban sustainable development in Tanzania: Dar es Salaam, Mwanza, and Kigoma. \u003cem\u003eSustainability\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e12\u003c/em\u003e(9), 3807.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Informal settlement, land regularization, community transformation, land governance, peri-urban, Tanzania","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6939498/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6939498/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eAs urban expansion accelerates across sub-Saharan Africa, informal settlements have become both a challenge and a focus for land governance reform. In Tanzania, land regularization initiatives have been promoted as a pathway towards improved governance, and community development. Yet, the social, political, economic, cultural, and environmental consequences of these reforms remain underexplored particularly from the perspectives of grassroots communities experiencing these changes. This study adopts a broader and more grounded lens to examine the multifaceted impacts of land regularization in eight peri-urban areas. The study investigates how land regularization processes reshapes community life beyond formal tenure security. The study draws from in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, participant observation, and document analysis. The study demonstrates that land regularization in peri-urban Tanzania functions as transformative socio-political process with deep ramifications for community identity, participation, and equity. The study argue that, land governance is a deeply political and cultural process that affects power dynamics, identity, and collective well-being. The study recommends for a rethinking of land governance frameworks to integrate social and cultural dimensions more explicitly. Therefore, policymakers and practitioners must move beyond legalism and adopt a more inclusive, context-sensitive approach that accounts for the lived realities of communities on the urbanizing frontier.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The Dynamic Impacts of Informal Settlement Land Regularization on Community Transformation and Land Governance in Peri-Urban Tanzania: Evidence from eight settlements in Mbarali District","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-07-28 10:23:07","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6939498/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"cc9e3767-73c1-49f7-9756-3eaddebcba09","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 28th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-07-28T10:23:08+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-07-28 10:23:07","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6939498","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6939498","identity":"rs-6939498","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}