Retraction Note: Oxycodone versus morphine for analgesia after laparoscopic endometriosis resection

other OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-08-03

This article is retracted because the authors modified the clinical trial protocol without ethics committee approval after initial approval was granted.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by gpt-5.6-luna, 2026-08-12 · read from full text

The retracted clinical trial compared oxycodone with morphine for analgesia after laparoscopic resection of endometriosis. The editor retracted the article because the authors changed the approved protocol without obtaining approval from the institutional ethics committee; all authors agreed to the retraction. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic endometriosis resection, although the retraction means its reported findings should not be treated as part of the valid evidence base.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 2,881 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · click to expand
Niu et al. BMC Anesthesiology (2021) 21:314 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01540-1 RETRACTION NOTE Retraction Note: Oxycodone versus morphine for analgesia after laparoscopic endometriosis resection Lijun Niu1, Lihong Chen2, Yanhua Luo3, Wenkao Huang4 and Yunsheng Li1* © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecom- mons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Retraction Note: BMC Anesthesiol 21, 194 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01417-3 The Editor has retracted this article because after obtaining approval for this clinical trial from the Insti - tutional Ethical Review Committee for Clinical Trials of The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University the authors made changes to the protocol without obtain - ing the Committee’s approval. All authors agree to this retraction. Author details 1 Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.58, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou 510080, China. 2 Depart- ment of Anesthesiology, The Six Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 26, Erheng Road, Guangzhou 510655, China. 3 Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.54 Xianlie South Road, Guangzhou 510060, China. 4 Department of Anesthesiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, China. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in pub- lished maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access The original article can be found online at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s12871- 021- 01540-1. *Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No.58, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou 510080, China Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-22T06:09:51.966504+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:24:08.918168+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine