On the necessity to include multiple types of evidence when predicting molecular function of proteins
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Machine learning-based platforms are currently revolutionizing many fields of molecular biology including structure prediction for monomers or complexes, predicting the consequences of mutations, or predicting the functions of proteins. However, these platforms use training sets based on currently available knowledge and, in essence, are not built to discover novelty. Hence, claims of discovering novel functions for protein families using artificial intelligence should be carefully dissected, as the dangers of overpredictions are real as we show in a detailed analysis of the prediction made by Kim et al 1 on the function of the YciO protein in the model organism Escherichia coli .
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-07-09T06:39:34.564547+00:00