Full text
51,461 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
The Genome of the American Dog Tick (Dermacentor variabilis) | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results The Genome of the American Dog Tick ( Dermacentor variabilis ) View ORCID Profile Jacob Cassens , View ORCID Profile Matt Villalta , View ORCID Profile Saul Aguirre , View ORCID Profile Lauren Ecklund , View ORCID Profile Trek Stenger , View ORCID Profile Idil Abdi , View ORCID Profile Sree Venigalla , View ORCID Profile Elizabeth Shiffman , View ORCID Profile Kristen Bastug , View ORCID Profile Beth K. Thielen , View ORCID Profile Christopher Faulk doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.12.642860 Jacob Cassens 1 Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Jacob Cassens Matt Villalta 2 ANSC 8520 Students, University of Minnesota Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Matt Villalta Saul Aguirre 2 ANSC 8520 Students, University of Minnesota Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Saul Aguirre Lauren Ecklund 2 ANSC 8520 Students, University of Minnesota Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Lauren Ecklund Trek Stenger 2 ANSC 8520 Students, University of Minnesota Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Trek Stenger Idil Abdi 2 ANSC 8520 Students, University of Minnesota Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Idil Abdi Sree Venigalla 2 ANSC 8520 Students, University of Minnesota Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Sree Venigalla Elizabeth Shiffman 3 Minnesota Department of Health Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Elizabeth Shiffman Kristen Bastug 4 Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Minnesota Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Kristen Bastug Beth K. Thielen 4 Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Minnesota Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Beth K. Thielen Christopher Faulk 5 Department of Animal Science, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Christopher Faulk For correspondence: cfaulk{at}umn.edu Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF Abstract The American dog tick ( Dermacentor variabilis ) is a vector of zoonotic pathogens in North America that poses emerging threats to public health. Despite its medical importance, genomic resources for D. variabilis remain scarce. Leveraging long-read nanopore sequencing, we generated a high-quality genome assembly for D. variabilis with a final size of 2.15 Gb, an N50 of 445 kb, and a BUSCO completeness score of 95.2%. Comparative BUSCO analyses revealed fewer duplicate genes in our assembly than in other Dermacentor genomes, indicating improved haplotype resolution. The mitochondrial genome, assembled as a single circular contig, clustered monophyletically with D. variabilis isolates from the Upper Midwest, corroborating regional phylogenetic relationships. Repetitive element analysis identified 61% of the genome as repetitive, dominated by LINEs and LTR elements, with 24% remaining unclassified, underscoring the need for further exploration of transposable elements in tick genomes. Gene annotation predicted 21,722 putative genes, achieving a protein BUSCO completeness of 80.88%. Additionally, genome-wide methylation analysis revealed 9.9% global 5mC methylation, providing the first insights into epigenetic modifications in D. variabilis . Further, nanopore sequencing detected Rickettsia montanensis and a non-pathogenic Francisella -like endosymbiont. These findings expand our understanding of tick genomics and epigenetics, offering valuable resources for comparative studies and evolutionary analyses. Introduction Dermacentor variabilis (Say, 1821), also known as the American dog tick or wood tick, is an obligate blood-feeding ectoparasite found throughout North America, first described over 200 years ago ( Lado et al., 2019 ). The American dog tick has three post-embryonic life stages (larva, nymph, adult), each requiring a blood meal for development and reproduction. Each life stage provides an opportunity to acquire a blood meal, and D. variabilis is a three-host tick that can feed on a different host species at each life stage. The immature life stages commonly parasitize smaller mammals, such as rodents, while adults primarily feed on larger animals, including dogs and deer ( Duncan et al., 2021 ). This blood-feeding strategy facilitates the enzootic maintenance of tick-borne pathogens. The American dog tick is a vector for human pathogenic Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever ( Rickettsia rickettsii ) and Tularemia ( Francisella tularensis ). It has also been found infected with other bacterial ( Anaplasma marginale, Ehrlichia spp.), protozoal ( Toxoplasma gondii, Cytauxzoon felis, Babesia spp.), and viral (Powassan) pathogens, although its vector competency for these agents is unknown ( Ben-Harari, 2019 ; Duncan et al., 2021 ; Hart et al., 2023 ; Reichard et al., 2021 ; Shock et al., 2014 ; Steiert and Gilfoy, 2002 ; Whitten et al., 2019 ). Additionally, D. variabilis exhibits aggressive host-seeking behavior and is most active during times of the year with increased human outdoor activity (e.g., April-September), making it one of the most frequently encountered hard ticks in the US ( Duncan et al., 2021 ). Although pathogen prevalence in natural populations remains low ( Eisen et al., 2017 ), expanding genomic resources for hard ticks like D. variabilis is critical to generating fundamental insights into tick biology and addressing global zoonotic threats. Ticks present unique challenges to genomic research due to their large genome sizes, high proportion of repetitive elements, and complex life cycles. Genomic studies on D. variabilis and other ticks have been limited yet are critical as ticks continue to expand their geographic ranges and pose growing threats to public health. The American dog tick belongs to the class Arachnida, order Ixodida, family Ixodidae, and group Metastriata. Metastriate ticks comprise 13 genera with over 450 species, representing a derived lineage relative to the basal Prostriata ( Mans et al., 2016 ). Currently, only ten unique genome assemblies for metastriate ticks are available on NCBI, and these resources have proved valuable for investigating tick biology and evolution. For example, comparative studies of metastriate and prostriate genomes in Europe and Asia have highlighted lineage-specific evolutionary trajectories of tick-host interactions, tick immunity, and ecological adaptations ( Cerqueira De Araujo et al., 2025 ; Jia et al., 2020 ). The recent advancements in long-read sequencing technologies, such as Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Pacific Biosciences (PacBio), have revolutionized tick genomics by overcoming challenges associated with assembling large and repetitive genomes. Our study contributes to this growing field by presenting the first whole-genome assembly for D. variabilis . This high-quality genome assembly provides a foundational resource for comparative genomic analyses, population genetics, and evolutionary studies. Further, as obligate blood feeders, ticks are a repository for exogenous DNA– previous blood meals, endosymbionts, and pathogens–that is recoverable from a single sample using native genomic sequencing. We demonstrate the utility of long-read sequencing technologies in differentiating tick DNA from pathogenic and non-pathogenic DNA while broadening our understanding of the genetic diversity, evolutionary history, and adaptive strategies of medically significant arthropods. Developing genomic resources for D. variabilis enhances the ability to identify novel targets for transgenic techniques and pest management strategies, aiding efforts to mitigate the impact of hard ticks on public health. Methods Sample collection Adult female D. variabilis ticks found attached to a companion canine after an outdoor walk in central Minnesota were removed and stored in 100% ethanol. Ticks were morphologically identified using the taxonomic key from Yunker et al., 1986. Ticks were transferred to Zymo DNA/RNA shield for one hour prior to DNA extraction and library preparation. DNA extraction and sequencing Genomic DNA was extracted from 10 adult female ticks using a MagAttract Blood DNA/RNA Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fragment size was assessed on an agarose gel. Size selection for fragments > 10 kb was attempted by treatment with a short fragment eliminator XS kit from PacBio. However, insufficient DNA was recovered for sequencing, necessitating the sequencing of short fragments only. Sequencing was performed on a P2 Solo instrument (ONT) using a single PromethION R10.4.1 flow cell. Data was collected using MinKNOW v23.07.12 in the 5 khz condition. Raw nanopore data in pod5 format was re-basecalled using dorado v0.8.2 ( https://github.com/nanoporetech/dorado ) with model dna_r10.4.1_e8.2_400bps_sup{at}v5.0.0 , and modifications called simultaneously with the flag ‘--modified-bases 5mC_5hmC’. Read quality was assessed using the Nanoq package ( https://github.com/esteinig/nanoq ). Genome Assembly The genome was de novo assembled using Flye v2.9 on a high memory (2 Tb) node due to the expected assembly size and our read depth ( https://github.com/fenderglass/Flye ). The resulting draft assembly was processed with the NCBI Foreign Contaminant Screen program to remove vector and adapter sequences ( https://github.com/ncbi/fcs ). Duplicate contigs and overlaps were removed with Purge_dups v1.2.6 ( https://github.com/dfguan/purge_dups ). Gaps were filled in the assembly by using the ntLink v1.3.11 scaffolding program with six rounds of linking and gap-filling ( https://github.com/bcgsc/ntLink ). The resulting scaffolded assembly was split back into contigs at all remaining unfilled gaps, and “n” bases were removed, creating a more contiguous contig-level assembly. The genome was decontaminated using Blobtoolkit v4.4.0 ( https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org ). First, the contigs were annotated using locally installed NCBI BLAST with the ‘core_nt’ database. Second, contig depth was calculated using samtools coverage. Finally, the blobtools database was generated and annotations analyzed in a browser. Hits assigned to “arthropoda” “no-hit” were kept and all other contigs removed. We also removed any contigs with less than 10X or greater than 1000X depth. The resulting assembly was designated as the reference. After each assembly iteration, the completeness of draft assemblies was evaluated using the standard Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Ortholog (BUSCO) count with the Arachnida lineage ( Simão et al., 2015 ). We used the compleasm package ( https://github.com/huangnengCSU/compleasm ; Huang and Li, 2023 ) to generate completeness scores as it offers a faster, more accurate implementation of BUSCO. We combined the single and duplicate counts from the compleasm scores to provide a direct comparison to BUSCO’s ‘complete’ value. Genome summary statistics, such as N50 and L50, were calculated using assembly-stats ( https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/assembly-stats ). The quality of each draft assembly was assessed by the read N50 (i.e., contig length at which 50% of the assembled genome is contained in longer contigs), read L50 (i.e., number of contigs whose cumulative length covers half the assembled genome), and the count of benchmark universal single-copy ortholog genes (BUSCOs) present in the assembly. Genome contiguity was visualized using the QUAST 5.3.0 package ( https://quast.sourceforge.net ). Mitochondrial assembly The mitogenome was extracted and characterized from the reads using MitoHiFi v3.2.2 ( https://github.com/marcelauliano/MitoHiFi ). MitoHiFi identifies putative mitogenomic contigs by comparing them to reference mitogenomes from related species ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2023 ). We manually specified the reference Dermacentor silvarum mitogenome for comparison (NC_026552.1). Default parameters were used with specifications for the invertebrate mitochondrial code. MitoHiFi identified, circularized, and annotated a single putative contig. Mitochondrial phylogeny Our D. variabilis mitogenome was compared against others available in NCBI along with related species to build a phylogeny using MAFFT v7.5 for alignment ( Katoh et al., 2019 ). Trees were generated and bootstrapped using Iqtree2 v2.3.6 ( https://github.com/iqtree/iqtree2 ) and visualized using FigTree v1.4.4 ( https://github.com/rambaut/figtree/releases ). Repeats Initial repeat content identification was performed using RepeatMasker v4.1.4 ( https://www.repeatmasker.org/ ) with the complete Dfam library v3.6 ( https://www.dfam.org/home ) as described by Flynn et al. (2020) and Storer et al. (2021) . RepeatMasker masked a low proportion of the genome, indicating that much of the genome’s repetitive content is not annotated in the public database. Thus, we compiled a custom database of repetitive element content using RepeatModeler2 ( https://github.com/Dfam-consortium/RepeatModeler ). We then re-ran RepeatMasker with the resulting custom database (via RepeatModeler2) to identify the complete repetitive element content in our assembly ( Flynn et al., 2020 ). Methylation Nanopore sequencing enables the direct detection of base modifications, such as 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), by measuring ionic current changes as nucleotides pass through nanopores on a flow cell. These current changes, determined by the molecular weights of modified versus unmodified bases, allow for methylation detection without requiring additional molecular preparation. The global methylation and hydroxymethylation (5mC and 5hmC) at CpG dinucleotides were determined using the modified base information stored in the basecalled BAM files. Modified BAM files were concatenated and mapped back to our draft assembly using Minimap2 ( https://github.com/lh3/minimap2 ). The modified mapped BAM was converted to bedMethyl format using modkit v0.3.4 ( https://github.com/nanoporetech/modkit ), and global 5mC and 5hmC percentages were summarized using AWK ( https://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/manual/gawk.html#Manual-History ). Gene annotation Gene Model Mapper (GeMoMa) v1.9 ( Keilwagen et al., 2019 ) was used for homology-based gene prediction using transcripts from Ixodes scapularis (ASM1692078v2) as a reference. BUSCO was executed in protein mode with the arachnida_odb10 database to assess prediction accuracy and completeness. Symbiont detection The total reads were aligned in succession to reference genomes from Francisella species (GCF_001275365.1, GCF_003347135.1, GCF_000833355.1) and Rickettsia rickettsii (GCF_000018225.1). Breadth and depth were calculated with samtools. Data was visualized with BAMstats v1.25 ( https://bamstats.sourceforge.net ). Data Availability Detailed computational methods are available in Supplementary file S1. The assembly is available via the NCBI Genome archive at PRJNA1224226, BioSample SAMN46853854; the raw reads are available in the Sequence Read Archive under the same accession. Results and Discussion Assembly We generated a total of 83.9 Gb of long read sequence data for the American dog tick ( Dermacentor variabilis ) with an N50 of 3.6 kb and a mean quality of Q19.1. The relatively short N50 was driven by the difficulty in extracting high molecular weight DNA from adult ticks. Our initial Flye run yielded a draft assembly of 2.5 Gb organized into 109,188 contigs with an N50 of 118 kb ( Table 1 ). The initial assembly was cleaned of contaminant sequences (e.g., vector, adapter, and symbiont), purged of duplicate contigs, and gaps were filled to increase contiguity. Our final assembly was 2.15 Gb consisting of 21,695 contigs with an N50 of 445 kb. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Genome contiguity and quality statistics for each iterative draft assembly for the reported Dermacentor variabilis genome. Our final assembled genome had a BUSCO completeness score of 95.2%, comparable to three other published Dermacentor genomes ( Table 2 ). BUSCO completeness scores can be deconstructed into single- and duplicate-copy percentages that provide more nuanced information about genome assembly quality. Single-copy genes suggest high-quality assembly, while duplicate-copy genes may indicate assembly errors. The other Dermacentor genomes had BUSCO scores over 97% with 2-4% duplicate-copy genes, while ours had a lower completeness score but fewer duplicates (2% duplicates in D. albipictus and D. andersoni and up to 4% in D. silvarum , suggesting potential uncollapsed haplotigs in those assemblies. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. BUSCO scores for the reported Dermacentor variabilis genome assembly and the other publicly available Dermacentor genome assemblies. Tick genomes are challenging to assemble due to their large size, complexity, and high proportion of repetitive elements. Short-read sequencing technologies often fail to resolve long repetitive sequences, limiting the generation of contiguous tick genomes. Long-read sequencing technologies, such as ONT and PacBio, address these limitations by spanning extensive repetitive regions. Advancements in third-generation sequencing technologies over the past decade have led to a surge in assembled tick genomes, and our assembly contributes to this expansion which significantly enhances our understanding of tick biology. Mitochondrial structure and phylogeny The mitochondrial genome was extracted from the assembly and characterized with MitoHiFi, a tool explicitly designed for identifying and annotating mitochondrial contigs from long-read sequencing data ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2023 ). The mitogenome assembly is a single circular contig spanning 14,845 bp, 6-8 bp longer than reference mitogenomes from various D. variabilis isolates on NCBI. The additional base pairs present in our mitogenome may stem from either homopolymer errors, a known limitation of nanopore sequencing, or true indels in our organism. Our mitogenome contained 22 tRNA genes, 13 protein-coding genes, and 2 rRNA genes consistent with the ancestral hard tick configuration ( Wang et al., 2019 ), clustering monophyletically with other D. variabilis collected from the Upper Midwest ( Figure 1a ). Although our mitogenome clustered with other isolates from the same geographical region, all D. variabilis mitogenomes were highly similar (>98.9%) over their entire length. Congeneric phylogenetic comparison supported previous analyses, clustering our mitogenome with the D. variabilis reference mitogenome (NC_061217), nested within a clade of Dermacentor spp . from the Americas, and distinct from closely related European and Asian Dermacentor spp . ( Reynolds et al., 2023 ; Figure 1b ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships between Dermacentor species were reconstructed using bootstrapped maximum likelihood comparisons of our assembled mitogenome to existing hard tick reference mitogenomes. Phylogenies were created using the entire mitochondrial genomes. (A) depicts relatedness among D. variabilis mitogenomes from throughout the United States, and (B) displays relationships between all available Dermacentor mitogenomes, rooted with I. scapularis as the outgroup. Repetitive DNA Tick repeats are not well characterized in the public Dfam database, limiting our understanding of repetitive element content in the Ixodidae. To address this gap, we leveraged RepeatModeler2 to curate a custom database of de novo repeats from our draft assembly. We subsequently used RepeatMasker to mask these repeats in our final assembly. RepeatModeler discovered 4,372 distinct repeat families, 58% categorized as unknown. This finding is consistent with previous reports, which also found that more than 45% of repeats in the I. scapularis genome were unclassified ( De et al., 2023 ). When we applied RepeatMasker to our assembly, it classified 61% of the genome as repetitive, with 32% of this content consisting of retroelements, predominately long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and long terminal repeat (LTRs) elements ( Table 3 ). Only 2.5% of repetitive content was categorized as DNA transposons, in stark contrast to other hematophagous insects, such as tsetse flies, where DNA transposons comprise a substantial fraction of repetitive DNA ( Attardo et al., 2019 ). Further, a considerable portion of the repetitive content (24%) remained unclassified, underscoring the complexity of transposable element (TE) dynamics in organisms with genomes dominated by selfish genetic elements. These unclassified repeats highlight the need for further investigation into the nature and role of TEs in tick genomes, which could provide insights into their evolution and genomic plasticity. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 3. Repetitive DNA content for the reported Dermacentor variabilis genome assembly. We applied our custom database of D. variabilis repeat families to mask three other published Dermacentor genomes. Our assembly shared a similar repeat content level with D. albipictus (59.64%), while D. andersoni (62.02%) and D. silvarum (54.27%) exhibited higher and lower levels, respectively. The lower repetitive content in our estimate of the D. silvarum genome compared to Jia et al. (2020) likely results from differences in the repetitive element databases used (Repbase vs. RepeatModeler). Repeat content in the D. variabilis genome aligns with other metastriate tick genomes, such as Rhipicephalus sanguineus (61.6%) and Haemaphysalis longicornus (59.3%), but differs from prostriate ticks like I. scapularis (69%) and I. ricinus (73%), despite belonging to the same family ( De et al., 2023 ; Ronai et al., 2024 ). These findings reinforce the phylogenetic relationships displayed in Figures 1a and 1b . Lineage-specific repetitive element content, driven by variations in TE activity, genome defense mechanisms (e.g., piRNA clusters), and evolutionary pressures, is evident across arthropod taxa ( Petersen et al., 2019 ). Considering TEs comprise the majority of tick genomes, understanding the forces shaping TE dynamics in hard ticks remains a priority. Detailed information is available in Supplementary file S2. Gene annotation Putative gene predictions were completed using the GeMoMa annotation tool. GeMoMa predicts gene models utilizing existing gene models in related reference species ( Keilwagen et al., 2019 ). We used the I. scapularis annotation (ASM1692078v2) as a reference, as it remains the most robust gene model among hard ticks. We detected 21,722 putative genes in our genome assembly. The protein BUSCO score was 80.88% complete (71.20% single copy and 9.68% duplicates), indicating a high level of completeness and reliability in the annotated genome. However, some regions may still contain fragmented or missing orthologs. Our genome annotation would benefit from detailed RNA-seq data and future methodological refinement. Annotations are available in Supplementary file S3. DNA Methylation We observed a genome-wide DNA methylation level of 9.9% in D. variabilis . Previous studies on other metastriate ticks, such as D. silvarum and H. longicornus , have characterized DNA methyltransferases, i.e., enzymes responsible for adding and maintaining methyl marks. Still, this study represents the first report of genome-wide methylation in metastriate ticks ( Agwunobi et al., 2021 ). The CpG dinucleotide composition of the D. variabilis genome suggests balanced transition rates in contrast to the biased CpG depletion observed in the mouse genome (mm39; Figure 2 ). Mammalian genomes, with global methylation levels exceeding 70%, exhibit accelerated loss of CpG dinucleotides— a pattern not evident in tick genomes. In arthropods like ticks, methylation may contribute to phenotypic variation, particularly in contexts with limited genotypic variation. Recent studies highlight the role of epigenetic mechanisms in hard tick cold tolerance, reproduction, fecundity, and overall fitness ( De et al., 2023 ; Nwanade et al., 2022 ; Yu et al., 2024 ). Future research should focus on elucidating the genomic distribution, spatial organization, and functional significance of methylation in ticks. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Distribution of nucleotide content comparing D. variabilis and Mus musculus , the house mouse. Symbiont identification The American dog tick is a potential vector for Tularemia ( Francisella tularensis ) and Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever ( Rickettsia rickettsii ). All reads were aligned to potential reference genomes to confirm the presence of any symbionts, and breadth and depth were calculated. Contig BLAST hits matched to F. persica, F. opportunistica , and F. tularensis , which were chosen for alignment. The depth and breadth of mapped reads are displayed in Table 4 and Figure 3 . Mapped reads demonstrated the highest breadth and depth of mapping to F. persica , indicating the presence of only this non-pathogenic endosymbiont. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 4. Read alignment statistics for pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganism reads extracted from the Dermacentor variabilis raw sequence data. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3: Alignment of mapped reads to the pathogenic and non-pathogenic (endosymbiont) reference genomes. Histograms display the coverage distribution for mapped reads, boxplots display the depth of coverage, and the genome viewer displays mapped read distribution across the reference genomes. Although no contigs were initially identified as Rickettsia rickettsii , we attempted to align reads to Rickettsia montanensis to determine its presence or absence, as it has been detected in D. variabilis ticks from Minnesota ( Hecht et al., 2019 ). We identified reads mapping to 99% of the reference genome but at a lower depth than the Francisella -like endosymbiont, suggesting comparatively low levels of Rickettsia in D. variabilis . Intriguingly, we could not assemble contigs for this species, preventing definitive identification when using the kraken2 standard library. Difficulty in re-constructing the reads mapping to this genome may have arisen from its inherent lower cell count, inevitably leading to lower genome coverage. This affirms previous reports of R. montanensis presence in Minnesota and should be monitored, considering its association with clinical and subclinical symptoms in humans ( Vincent and Hulstrand, 2022 ). Conclusions Our study presents the first whole-genome assembly for Dermacentor variabilis , the American dog tick, a hard tick widely distributed across North America. Our assembly achieved a BUSCO completeness score comparable to other publicly available Dermacentor genomes, underlining the utility of nanopore sequencing for generating high-quality tick genomes. Beyond its value for understanding tick biology and evolution, this assembly facilitates improved detection of tick-associated microbes, including endosymbionts and potential pathogens. Amplification-free unbiased detection and identification of tick endosymbiont species within ticks remains challenging, owing to their complex evolutionary histories and low copy number compared to mitochondrial DNA. Nanopore sequencing allowed us to distinguish a Francisella -like endosymbiont, mapping more closely to F. persica than F. tularensis , using read mapping statistics (e.g., breadth and depth) to avoid false positives commonly encountered with PCR-based identification ( Kugeler et al., 2005 ). Moreover, we detected Rickettsia montanensis through total read alignment to its reference genome despite an inability to assemble contigs for this species. These findings underscore the need to refine bioinformatic tools for long-read sequence data to better distinguish pathogenic from non-pathogenic bacterial DNA in ticks and highlights the importance of broadening genomic resources to improve our understanding of tick-microbe molecular interactions. Expanding genomic resources for medically relevant arthropods is critical for uncovering evolutionary processes underlying vectorial capacity, migration, and life-history traits. Ticks, second only to mosquitoes in global vector significance, represent an expanding area for genomic exploration. Sequencing of hard tick genomes has provided key insights into genome biology, permitting comparative analysis between hard tick groups (i.e., Prostriata and Metastriata) that can reveal lineage-specific evolution of gene families, hematophagy, and ecological adaptations ( Cerqueira De Araujo et al., 2025 ; De et al., 2023 ; Jia et al., 2020 ). Despite over 450 documented metastriate species, only ten unique genome assemblies are available on NCBI. Our D. variabilis genome helps close this gap, offering a critical resource for comparative analyses of tick genetic diversity, evolutionary history, and population genetics as ticks expand into new geographic areas and pose emerging zoonotic threats. Funding This work was supported by USDA-NIFA MIN-16-129 (Faulk), T32AI055433 (Bastug), T32AR007612 (Stenger). This publication was made possible by Grant Number NU50CK000628 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Pathogen Genomics Centers of Excellence grant (Thielen). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Author contributions This work was a collaborative effort by the members of the graduate course ANSC 8520 taught by Dr. Faulk in the Department of Animal Science at the University of Minnesota in the Fall of 2024. Students were Matt Villalta, Saul Aguirre, Lauren Ecklund, Trek Stenger, Idil Abdi, and Sree Venigalla. Students performed analyses and provided text for the manuscript. Jacob Cassens provided samples, performed analyses, and wrote the manuscript. Ms. Shiffman provided additional samples. Drs. Kristen Bastug and Beth Thielen completed assemblies and analyses and edited the manuscript. Dr. Faulk performed analyses and wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript prior to submission. Data Availability Statement Supplementary File S1 provides detailed descriptions of the computational steps outlined in the methods. Supplementary File S2 contains the transposon family database generated from RepeatModeler2. Supplementary File S3 contains the gene annotations in GFF format. Sequence data for the whole genome and mitogenome assemblies are deposited in GenBank with the accession number JBLSAA000000000. Supplementary Files File S1: Supplementary methods File S2: Transposon family database File S3: Annotations in GFF format Acknowledgments The authors thank William Finical for kindly providing the ticks. Footnotes Contacts Jacob Cassens casse090{at}umn.edu Matt Villalta villa277{at}umn.edu Saul Aguirre aguir165{at}umn.edu Lauren Ecklund ecklu089{at}umn.edu Trek Stenger steng131{at}umn.edu Idil Abdi abdi0087{at}umn.edu Sree Venigalla venig004{at}umn.edu Elizabeth Shiffman elizabeth.schiffman{at}state.mn.us Kristen Bastug bastu004{at}umn.edu Beth K. Thielen thie0149{at}umn.edu Christopher Faulk cfaulk{at}umn.edu References ↵ Agwunobi , D.O. , Zhang , Miao , Shi , X. , Zhang , S. , Zhang , Meng , Wang , T. , Masoudi , A. , Yu , Z. , Liu , J. , 2021 . DNA Methyltransferases Contribute to Cold Tolerance in Ticks Dermacentor silvarum and Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) . Front. Vet. Sci . 8 , 726731 . doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.726731 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Attardo , G.M. , Abd-Alla , A.M.M. , Acosta-Serrano , A. , Allen , J.E. , Bateta , R. , Benoit , J.B. , Bourtzis , K. , Caers , J. , Caljon , G. , Christensen , M.B. , Farrow , D.W. , Friedrich , M. , Hua-Van , A. , Jennings , E.C. , Larkin , D.M. , Lawson , D. , Lehane , M.J. , Lenis , V.P. , Lowy-Gallego , E. , Macharia , R.W. , Malacrida , A.R. , Marco , H.G. , Masiga , D. , Maslen , G.L. , Matetovici , I. , Meisel , R.P. , Meki , I. , Michalkova , V. , Miller , W.J. , Minx , P. , Mireji , P.O. , Ometto , L. , Parker , A.G. , Rio , R. , Rose , C. , Rosendale , A.J. , Rota-Stabelli , O. , Savini , G. , Schoofs , L. , Scolari , F. , Swain , M.T. , Takáč , P. , Tomlinson , C. , Tsiamis , G. , Van Den Abbeele , J. , Vigneron , A. , Wang , J. , Warren , W.C. , Waterhouse , R.M. , Weirauch , M.T. , Weiss , B.L. , Wilson , R.K. , Zhao , X. , Aksoy , S. , 2019 . Comparative genomic analysis of six Glossina genomes, vectors of African trypanosomes . Genome Biol . 20 , 187 . doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1768-2 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Ben-Harari , R.R. , 2019 . Tick transmission of toxoplasmosis . Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther . 17 , 911 – 917 . doi: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1682550 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Catapano , P.L. , Falcinelli , M. , Damiani , C. , Cappelli , A. , Koukouli , D. , Rossi , P. , Ricci , I. , Napolioni , V. , Favia , G. , 2023 . De novo genome assembly of the invasive mosquito species Aedes japonicus and Aedes koreicus . Parasit. Vectors 16 , 427 . doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-06048-w OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Cerqueira De Araujo , A. , Noel , B. , Bretaudeau , A. , Labadie , K. , Boudet , M. , Tadrent , N. , Istace , B. , Kritli , S. , Cruaud , C. , Olaso , R. , Deleuze , J.-F. , Voordouw , M.J. , Hervet , C. , Plantard , O. , Zamoto-Niikura , A. , Chertemps , T. , Maïbèche , M. , Hilliou , F. , Le Goff , G. , Chmelař , J. , Mazák , V. , Jmel , M.A. , Kotsyfakis , M. , Medina , J.M. , Hackenberg , M. , Šimo , L. , Koutroumpa , F.A. , Wincker , P. , Kopáček , P. , Perner , J. , Aury , J.-M. , Rispe , C. , 2025 . Genome sequences of four Ixodes species expands understanding of tick evolution . BMC Biol . 23 , 17 . doi: 10.1186/s12915-025-02121-1 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ De , S. , Kingan , S.B. , Kitsou , C. , Portik , D.M. , Foor , S.D. , Frederick , J.C. , Rana , V.S. , Paulat , N.S. , Ray , D.A. , Wang , Y. , Glenn , T.C. , Pal , U. , 2023 . A high-quality Ixodes scapularis genome advances tick science . Nat. Genet . 55 , 301 – 311 . doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01275-w OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Duncan , K.T. , Saleh , M.N. , Sundstrom , K.D. , Little , S.E. , 2021 . Dermacentor variabilis is the Predominant Dermacentor spp. (Acari: Ixodidae) Feeding on Dogs and Cats Throughout the United States . J. Med. Entomol . 58 , 1241 – 1247 . doi: 10.1093/jme/tjab007 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Eisen , R.J. , Kugeler , K.J. , Eisen , L. , Beard , C.B. , Paddock , C.D. , 2017 . Tick-Borne Zoonoses in the United States: Persistent and Emerging Threats to Human Health . ILAR J . 58 , 319 – 335 . doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilx005 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Flynn , J.M. , Hubley , R. , Goubert , C. , Rosen , J. , Clark , A.G. , Feschotte , C. , Smit , A.F. , 2020 . RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci . 117 , 9451 – 9457 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921046117 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Hart , C. , Hassett , E. , Vogels , C.B.F. , Shapley , D. , Grubaugh , N.D. , Thangamani , S. , 2023 . Powassan Virus Lineage I in Field-Collected Dermacentor variabilis Ticks, New York, USA . Emerg. Infect. Dis . 29 , 415 – 417 . doi: 10.3201/eid2902.220410 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Hecht , J.A. , Allerdice , M.E.J. , Dykstra , E.A. , Mastel , L. , Eisen , R.J. , Johnson , T.L. , Gaff , H.D. , Varela-Stokes , A.S. , Goddard , J. , Pagac , B.B. , Paddock , C.D. , Karpathy , S.E. , 2019 . Multistate Survey of American Dog Ticks (Dermacentor variabilis) for Rickettsia Species . Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis . 19 , 652 – 657 . doi: 10.1089/vbz.2018.2415 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Huang , N. , Li , H. , 2023 . compleasm: a faster and more accurate reimplementation of BUSCO . Bioinformatics 39 , btad595 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad595 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Jia , N. , Wang , J. , Shi , W. , Du , L. , Sun , Y. , Zhan , W. , Jiang , J.-F. , Wang , Q. , Zhang , B. , Ji , P. , Bell-Sakyi , L. , Cui , X.-M. , Yuan , T.-T. , Jiang , B.-G. , Yang , W.-F. , Lam , T.T.-Y. , Chang , Q.-C. , Ding , S.-J. , Wang , X.-J. , Zhu , J.-G. , Ruan , X.-D. , Zhao , L. , Wei , J.-T. , Ye , R.-Z. , Que , T.C. , Du , C.-H. , Zhou , Y.-H. , Cheng , J.X. , Dai , P.-F. , Guo , W.-B. , Han , X.-H. , Huang , E.-J. , Li , L.-F. , Wei , W. , Gao , Y.-C. , Liu , J.-Z. , Shao , H.-Z. , Wang , X. , Wang , C.-C. , Yang , T.-C. , Huo , Q.-B. , Li , W. , Chen , H.-Y. , Chen , S.-E. , Zhou , L.-G. , Ni , X.-B. , Tian , J.-H. , Sheng , Y. , Liu , T. , Pan , Y.-S. , Xia , L.-Y. , Li , J. , Zhao , F. , Cao , W.-C. , 2020 . Large-Scale Comparative Analyses of Tick Genomes Elucidate Their Genetic Diversity and Vector Capacities . Cell 182 , 1328 - 1340.e13 . doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.023 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Jiang , X. , Peery , A. , Hall , A.B. , Sharma , A. , Chen , X.-G. , Waterhouse , R.M. , Komissarov , A. , Riehle , M.M. , Shouche , Y. , Sharakhova , M.V. , Lawson , D. , Pakpour , N. , Arensburger , P. , Davidson , V.L.M. , Eiglmeier , K. , Emrich , S. , George , P. , Kennedy , R.C. , Mane , S.P. , Maslen , G. , Oringanje , C. , Qi , Y. , Settlage , R. , Tojo , M. , Tubio , J.M.C. , Unger , M.F. , Wang , B. , Vernick , K.D. , Ribeiro , J.M.C. , James , A.A. , Michel , K. , Riehle , M.A. , Luckhart , S. , Sharakhov , I.V. , Tu , Z. , 2014 . Genome analysis of a major urban malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles stephensi . Genome Biol . 15 , 459 . doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0459-2 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Katoh , K. , Rozewicki , J. , Yamada , K.D. , 2019 . MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization . Brief. Bioinform . 20 , 1160 – 1166 . doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Kollmar , M. Keilwagen , J. , Hartung , F. , Grau , J. , 2019 . GeMoMa: Homology-Based Gene Prediction Utilizing Intron Position Conservation and RNA-seq Data , in: Kollmar , M. (Ed.), Gene Prediction, Methods in Molecular Biology . Springer New York , New York, NY , pp. 161 – 177 . doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_9 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Kugeler , K.J. , Gurfield , N. , Creek , J.G. , Mahoney , K.S. , Versage , J.L. , Petersen , J.M. , 2005 . Discrimination between Francisella tularensis and Francisella -Like Endosymbionts when Screening Ticks by PCR . Appl. Environ. Microbiol . 71 , 7594 – 7597 . doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7594-7597.2005 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Lado , P. , Cox , C. , Wideman , K. , Hernandez , A. , Klompen , H. , 2019 . Population Genetics of Dermacentor variabilis Say 1821 (Ixodida: Ixodidae) in the United States Inferred From ddRAD-seq SNP Markers . Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. saz025 . doi: 10.1093/aesa/saz025 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Mans , B.J. , De Castro , M.H. , Pienaar , R. , De Klerk , D. , Gaven , P. , Genu , S. , Latif , A.A. , 2016 . Ancestral reconstruction of tick lineages . Ticks Tick-Borne Dis . 7 , 509 – 535 . doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.02.002 OpenUrl CrossRef Matthews , B.J. , Dudchenko , O. , Kingan , S.B. , Koren , S. , Antoshechkin , I. , Crawford , J.E. , Glassford , W.J. , Herre , M. , Redmond , S.N. , Rose , N.H. , Weedall , G.D. , Wu , Y. , Batra , S.S. , Brito-Sierra , C.A. , Buckingham , S.D. , Campbell , C.L. , Chan , S. , Cox , E. , Evans , B.R. , Fansiri , T. , Filipović , I. , Fontaine , A. , Gloria-Soria , A. , Hall , R. , Joardar , V.S. , Jones , A.K. , Kay , R.G.G. , Kodali , V.K. , Lee , J. , Lycett , G.J. , Mitchell , S.N. , Muehling , J. , Murphy , M.R. , Omer , A.D. , Partridge , F.A. , Peluso , P. , Aiden , A.P. , Ramasamy , V. , Rašić , G. , Roy , S. , Saavedra-Rodriguez , K. , Sharan , S. , Sharma , A. , Smith , M.L. , Turner , J. , Weakley , A.M. , Zhao , Z. , Akbari , O.S. , Black , W.C. , Cao , H. , Darby , A.C. , Hill , C.A. , Johnston , J.S. , Murphy , T.D. , Raikhel , A.S. , Sattelle , D.B. , Sharakhov , I.V. , White , B.J. , Zhao , L. , Aiden , E.L. , Mann , R.S. , Lambrechts , L. , Powell , J.R. , Sharakhova , M.V. , Tu , Z. , Robertson , H.M. , McBride , C.S. , Hastie , A.R. , Korlach , J. , Neafsey , D.E. , Phillippy , A.M. , Vosshall , L.B. , 2018 . Improved reference genome of Aedes aegypti informs arbovirus vector control . Nature 563 , 501 – 507 . doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0692-z OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Nwanade , C.F. , Wang , Z. , Bai , R. , Wang , R. , Zhang , T. , Liu , J. , Yu , Z. , 2022 . DNA Methylation Variation Is a Possible Mechanism in the Response of Haemaphysalis longicornis to Low-Temperature Stress . Int. J. Mol. Sci . 23 , 15207 . doi: 10.3390/ijms232315207 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Petersen , M. , Armisén , D. , Gibbs , R.A. , Hering , L. , Khila , A. , Mayer , G. , Richards , S. , Niehuis , O. , Misof , B. , 2019 . Diversity and evolution of the transposable element repertoire in arthropods with particular reference to insects . BMC Ecol. Evol . 19 , 11 . doi: 10.1186/s12862-018-1324-9 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Reichard , M.V. , Sanders , T.L. , Weerarathne , P. , Meinkoth , J.H. , Miller , C.A. , Scimeca , R.C. , Almazán , C. , 2021 . Cytauxzoonosis in North America . Pathogens 10 , 1170 . doi: 10.3390/pathogens10091170 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Reynolds , S. , Hedberg , M. , Herrin , B. , Jesudoss Chelladurai , J.R.J. , 2023 . Mitochondrial Genomes of the American Dog Tick (Dermacentor variabilis) Isolated from Horses in the Midwestern United States . Microbiol. Resour. Announc . 12 , e00330 – 22 . doi: 10.1128/mra.00330-22 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Ronai , I. , De Paula Baptista , R. , Paulat , N.S. , Frederick , J.C. , Azagi , T. , Bakker , J.W. , Dillon , K.C. , Sprong , H. , Ray , D.A. , Glenn , T.C. , 2024 . The repetitive genome of the Ixodes ricinus tick reveals transposable elements have driven genome evolution in ticks . doi: 10.1101/2024.03.13.584159 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text ↵ Shock , B.C. , Moncayo , A. , Cohen , S. , Mitchell , E.A. , Williamson , P.C. , Lopez , G. , Garrison , L.E. , Yabsley , M.J. , 2014 . Diversity of piroplasms detected in blood-fed and questing ticks from several states in the United States . Ticks Tick-Borne Dis . 5 , 373 – 380 . doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.01.003 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Simão , F.A. , Waterhouse , R.M. , Ioannidis , P. , Kriventseva , E.V. , Zdobnov , E.M. , 2015 . BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs . Bioinformatics 31 , 3210 – 3212 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Steiert , J.G. , Gilfoy , F. , 2002 . Infection Rates of Amblyomma americanum and Dermacentor variabilis by Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii in Southwest Missouri . Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis . 2 , 53 – 60 . doi: 10.1089/153036602321131841 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Storer , J. , Hubley , R. , Rosen , J. , Wheeler , T.J. , Smit , A.F. , 2021 . The Dfam community resource of transposable element families, sequence models, and genome annotations . Mob. DNA 12 , 2 . doi: 10.1186/s13100-020-00230-y OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Uliano-Silva , M. , Ferreira , J.G.R.N. , Krasheninnikova , K. , Blaxter , M. , Mieszkowska , N. , Hall , N. , Holland , P. , Durbin , R. , Richards , T. , Kersey , P. , Hollingsworth , P. , Wilson , W. , Twyford , A. , Gaya , E. , Lawniczak , M. , Lewis , O. , Broad , G. , Martin , F. , Hart , M. , Barnes , I. , Formenti , G. , Abueg , L. , Torrance , J. , Myers , E.W. , Durbin , R. , Blaxter , M. , McCarthy , S.A. , Darwin Tree of Life Consortium , 2023 . MitoHiFi: a python pipeline for mitochondrial genome assembly from PacBio high fidelity reads . BMC Bioinformatics 24 , 288 . doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05385-y OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Vincent , G.P. , Hulstrand , A.M. , 2022 . Detection of Rickettsia montanensis in Dermacentor variabilis in Northern Wisconsin . Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis . 22 , 582 – 583 . doi: 10.1089/vbz.2022.0055 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Wang , T. , Zhang , S. , Pei , T. , Yu , Z. , Liu , J. , 2019 . Tick mitochondrial genomes: structural characteristics and phylogenetic implications . Parasit. Vectors 12 , 451 . doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3705-3 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed ↵ Whitten , T. , Demontigny , C. , Bjork , J. , Foss , M. , Peterson , M. , Scheftel , J. , Neitzel , D. , Sullivan , M. , Smith , K. , 2019 . Prevalence of Francisella tularensis in Dermacentor variabilis Ticks, Minnesota, 2017 . Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis . 19 , 596 – 603 . doi: 10.1089/vbz.2018.2388 OpenUrl CrossRef ↵ Yu , Z. , Pei , T. , Shi , X. , Nwanade , C.F. , Bing , Z. , Gao , Z. , Meng , J. , Li , L. , Liu , J. , 2024 . The functions of DNA methyltransferases during the feeding and development of Haemaphysalis longicornis are potentially associated with lysosome pathways . BMC Genomics 25 , 1109 . doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-11049-9 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted March 14, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following The Genome of the American Dog Tick (Dermacentor variabilis) Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share The Genome of the American Dog Tick ( Dermacentor variabilis ) Jacob Cassens , Matt Villalta , Saul Aguirre , Lauren Ecklund , Trek Stenger , Idil Abdi , Sree Venigalla , Elizabeth Shiffman , Kristen Bastug , Beth K. Thielen , Christopher Faulk bioRxiv 2025.03.12.642860; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.12.642860 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools The Genome of the American Dog Tick ( Dermacentor variabilis ) Jacob Cassens , Matt Villalta , Saul Aguirre , Lauren Ecklund , Trek Stenger , Idil Abdi , Sree Venigalla , Elizabeth Shiffman , Kristen Bastug , Beth K. Thielen , Christopher Faulk bioRxiv 2025.03.12.642860; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.03.12.642860 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Genomics Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7636) Biochemistry (17704) Bioengineering (13898) Bioinformatics (41967) Biophysics (21460) Cancer Biology (18599) Cell Biology (25525) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13384) Ecology (19909) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24326) Genetics (15613) Genomics (22512) Immunology (17740) Microbiology (40423) Molecular Biology (17191) Neuroscience (88645) Paleontology (667) Pathology (2835) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4825) Physiology (7646) Plant Biology (15158) Scientific Communication and Education (2046) Synthetic Biology (4302) Systems Biology (9825) Zoology (2271)
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.