Excitation–inhibition interactions mediate firefly flash synchronization

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

The paper studies how intrinsically variable North American fireflies (Photuris frontalis males) synchronize their bioluminescent flash rhythms, focusing on the local interaction rules that produce population-level stable single-period beating. Using controlled perturbation experiments with fixed-period light stimuli on isolated males, the authors measure flash period changes over stimulus timing to reconstruct a phase-response curve (PRC) for individual flash dynamics, finding a biphasic PRC with both phase-advancing (excitatory) and phase-delaying (inhibitory) effects. They then use this PRC to build an integrate-and-fire model that quantitatively reproduces adaptable entrainment across the tested stimuli, with the main caveat being that the mechanistic modeling is grounded in isolated-animal stimulus-response measurements rather than direct measurement of inter-individual synaptic-like interactions. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Large populations of fireflies can synchronize their bioluminescent flashes with remarkable precision, producing collective rhythms that emerge from interactions among intrinsically variable individuals. In the North American firefly Photuris frontalis , this behavior usually manifests as a stable, population-level single-period beat whose mechanistic origins remain unresolved. To identify the local interaction rules giving rise to this emergent synchrony, we performed controlled perturbation experiments on isolated P. frontalis males using fixed-period light stimuli. By measuring changes in flash period as a function of stimulus timing, we reconstructed the phase-response curve (PRC) governing individual flash dynamics. The resulting PRC exhibits a biphasic structure, revealing phase-advancing (excitatory) and phase-delaying (inhibitory) responses. Using this PRC, we formalized an integrate-and-fire model that quantitatively reproduced the observed adaptable entrainment across tested stimuli. These results establish a direct mechanistic link between phase sensitivity and emergent collective synchronization, demonstrating how excitation–inhibition interactions influence large-scale rhythmic coherence in firefly populations.
Full text 1,329 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Large populations of fireflies can synchronize their bioluminescent flashes with remarkable precision, producing collective rhythms that emerge from interactions among intrinsically variable individuals. In the North American firefly Photuris frontalis, this behavior usually manifests as a stable, population-level single-period beat whose mechanistic origins remain unresolved. To identify the local interaction rules giving rise to this emergent synchrony, we performed controlled perturbation experiments on isolated P. frontalis males using fixed-period light stimuli. By measuring changes in flash period as a function of stimulus timing, we reconstructed the phase-response curve (PRC) governing individual flash dynamics. The resulting PRC exhibits a biphasic structure, revealing phase-advancing (excitatory) and phase-delaying (inhibitory) responses. Using this PRC, we formalized an integrate-and-fire model that quantitatively reproduced the observed adaptable entrainment across tested stimuli. These results establish a direct mechanistic link between phase sensitivity and emergent collective synchronization, demonstrating how excitation–inhibition interactions influence large-scale rhythmic coherence in firefly populations. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0