Success rate in gamete intrafallopian transfer using low and high concentrations of washed spermatozoa

other OA: closed public-domain-us
View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This retrospective study found no significant difference in pregnancy or abortion rates in gamete intrafallopian transfer cycles using sperm concentrations ranging from 100,000 to 2,500.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The effect of a reduced number of spermatozoa on pregnancies and miscarriages was studied retrospectively in 307 consecutive gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) cycles. The number of spermatozoa introduced per GIFT in each group was as follows: 100,000 (group I), 50,000 (group II), 10,000 (group III), 5,000 (group IV), and 2,500 (group V), which gave a pregnancy rate of 20%, 38%, 37%, 30%, and 24%, respectively (differences were not significant). With respect to the pregnancies, no correlation was found between the number of spermatozoa transferred and the cause of infertility. In the male factor group also no significant difference was observed in the pregnancy rate when the sperms were reduced from 100,000 to 2,500. Lowering the number of sperms in GIFT did not reduce the abortion rate, which remained around 33%. It was the patients with unexplained infertility who benefited most from the GIFT procedure. Their pregnancy rate was significantly higher than the pregnancy rate of those who had endometriosis, or andrologic or immunologic disorders.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer Spermatozoa Adult Female Humans Male Maternal Age Pregnancy Spermatozoa

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-18T06:15:08.409253+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:15.954262+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-18T06:36:33.011116+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine