Quantitative evaluation of 3D-printed physiological visualization tools in enhancing interns' knowledge retention and application.

RCT OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

BackgroundTraditional physiology teaching relies on 2D materials and static specimens, making it difficult to intuitively present complex anatomical structures and physiological mechanisms. 3D Intelligent Printing Technology (3DIPT) has demonstrated application value in surgical training, but its use in physiology education remains underexplored.MethodsA randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted, enrolling 120 undergraduate nursing interns who were randomly divided into a control group (traditional teaching) and an observation group (3DIPT-assisted teaching) with a 6-month intervention period. The observation group used 3D-printed models of key nursing-relevant organs; this paper partially presents those of the ovary, uterus, stomach, prostate, and kidney for clinical education and connected learning. Outcome measures included scores on physiology-related knowledge (nurse licensing examination simulation), Social Medical Curiosity (SMC), self-directed learning ability, mobile learning willingness, and Medical Students' Transformative Learning Readiness (MSTLR).ResultsAfter the intervention, the observation group showed significantly higher scores than the control group in physiology knowledge (77.30 ± 9.65 vs. 67.36 ± 9.55, p < 0.01), SMC (24.90 ± 4.7 vs. 23.57 ± 3.40, p = 0.0395), autonomous learning ability (118.95 ± 3.15 vs. 117.10 ± 3.56, p = 0.0391), mobile learning willingness (126.60 ± 10.35 vs. 116.40 ± 10.20, p = 0.0268), and MSTLR (61.50 ± 5.35 vs. 56.10 ± 5.20, p = 0.0223).Conclusion3DIPT-assisted teaching can effectively improve nursing interns' mastery of physiology knowledge and core competencies such as medical interest and autonomous learning. It provides an intuitive visualization tool for physiology education and holds significant potential for advancing basic medical teaching reform.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

organisms 5
microbiota human human human human

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-10-11T10:00:34.751994+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Per Europe PMC