Inference Equivalence: A Decoder-Constrained Framework for Representation Sufficiency in Neural Population Codes

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

This paper introduces Inference Equivalence, a decoder-constrained framework that assesses neural representation sufficiency by evaluating the invariance of achievable inference risk within a specified decoder family.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16 · read from full text

The paper studies how to assess whether neural population representations remain sufficient for downstream inference when readout units are constrained, introducing Inference Equivalence (IE) as a decoder-constrained framework. Using controlled perturbations of neural population activity, the authors show that preserving low-order response statistics (e.g., firing rates and covariance structure) is neither necessary nor sufficient to preserve achievable decoding performance, because inference depends on the decoder family and its constraints. IE instead defines functional equivalence by invariance of achievable inference risk after decoder re-optimization, establishing a falsifiable way to compare representations beyond statistical similarity. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Neural population analyses commonly evaluate representation-preserving transformations by assessing whether selected response statistics—such as firing rates and covariance structure—are maintained. Yet preservation of descriptive statistics does not guarantee preservation of downstream computation, because achievable inference depends on the constraints imposed on biological readout. We introduce Inference Equivalence (IE), a decoder-constrained framework for assessing representation sufficiency in neural population codes. IE defines functional equivalence through invariance of achievable inference risk within a specified decoder family, interpreted as biologically plausible downstream cortical decoding under synaptic and computational constraints. Rather than comparing neural representations through statistical similarity alone, IE evaluates whether distinct representations support equivalent perceptual or decision-related inference after decoder re-optimization. Using controlled perturbations of neural population activity, we show that preservation of low-order response statistics is neither necessary nor sufficient to preserve achievable decoding performance. Conversely, representations with substantial statistical distortions can remain functionally equivalent after decoder adaptation. These results establish IE as a practical and falsifiable framework for assessing functional equivalence in neural population codes and clarify when statistical similarity does—or does not—support equivalent downstream computation.
Full text 10,710 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Inference Equivalence: A Decoder-Constrained Framework for Representation Sufficiency in Neural Population Codes | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Inference Equivalence: A Decoder-Constrained Framework for Representation Sufficiency in Neural Population Codes Cam H. Pham This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9684727/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Neural population analyses commonly evaluate representation-preserving transformations by assessing whether selected response statistics—such as firing rates and covariance structure—are maintained. Yet preservation of descriptive statistics does not guarantee preservation of downstream computation, because achievable inference depends on the constraints imposed on biological readout. We introduce Inference Equivalence (IE), a decoder-constrained framework for assessing representation sufficiency in neural population codes. IE defines functional equivalence through invariance of achievable inference risk within a specified decoder family, interpreted as biologically plausible downstream cortical decoding under synaptic and computational constraints. Rather than comparing neural representations through statistical similarity alone, IE evaluates whether distinct representations support equivalent perceptual or decision-related inference after decoder re-optimization. Using controlled perturbations of neural population activity, we show that preservation of low-order response statistics is neither necessary nor sufficient to preserve achievable decoding performance. Conversely, representations with substantial statistical distortions can remain functionally equivalent after decoder adaptation. These results establish IE as a practical and falsifiable framework for assessing functional equivalence in neural population codes and clarify when statistical similarity does—or does not—support equivalent downstream computation. Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files SupplementaryMaterials.zip Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9684727","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":639605948,"identity":"5d936850-00aa-4843-b8b1-f1feb0fd9842","order_by":0,"name":"Cam H. Pham","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Can Tho University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Cam","middleName":"H.","lastName":"Pham","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-05-12 00:23:13","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9684727/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9684727/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":109249646,"identity":"5f756bb3-87f9-468e-b445-6e6314cf0bed","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-05-14 08:58:24","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1238769,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ManuscriptMainText.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9684727/v1_covered_8dfd148f-0ff4-4b43-8fd5-eb90ffcb774e.pdf"},{"id":109231264,"identity":"5f34c1d6-f388-4c76-ba9b-31809cd096d9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-05-14 03:23:01","extension":"zip","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":1067697,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryMaterials.zip","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9684727/v1/862923029180db6858f5214d.zip"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Inference Equivalence: A Decoder-Constrained Framework for Representation Sufficiency in Neural Population Codes","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9684727/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9684727/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Neural population analyses commonly evaluate representation-preserving transformations by assessing whether selected response statistics—such as firing rates and covariance structure—are maintained. Yet preservation of descriptive statistics does not guarantee preservation of downstream computation, because achievable inference depends on the constraints imposed on biological readout. We introduce Inference Equivalence (IE), a decoder-constrained framework for assessing representation sufficiency in neural population codes. IE defines functional equivalence through invariance of achievable inference risk within a specified decoder family, interpreted as biologically plausible downstream cortical decoding under synaptic and computational constraints. Rather than comparing neural representations through statistical similarity alone, IE evaluates whether distinct representations support equivalent perceptual or decision-related inference after decoder re-optimization. Using controlled perturbations of neural population activity, we show that preservation of low-order response statistics is neither necessary nor sufficient to preserve achievable decoding performance. Conversely, representations with substantial statistical distortions can remain functionally equivalent after decoder adaptation. These results establish IE as a practical and falsifiable framework for assessing functional equivalence in neural population codes and clarify when statistical similarity does—or does not—support equivalent downstream computation.","manuscriptTitle":"Inference Equivalence: A Decoder-Constrained Framework for Representation Sufficiency in Neural Population Codes","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-05-14 03:22:44","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9684727/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"7341abb5-eff2-4093-ab42-f5ef00adf847","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 14th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2026-05-13T09:33:51+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Biological Cybernetics","date":"2026-05-12T00:10:18+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-05-14T03:22:44+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-05-14 03:22:44","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9684727","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9684727","identity":"rs-9684727","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0