The Moral Responsibility of Designers Regarding AI: Protocol for a Meta-Aggregative Systematic Review

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

This study presents a systematic review protocol to explore the moral responsibility of designers in the context of artificial intelligence (AI). The review synthesizes qualitative evidence to address the ethical implications of designer choices and their impact on the development, improvement, and use of AI systems, products, and services. By leveraging a meta-aggregative approach, the study examines key questions: What constitutes the moral responsibility of designers? How do ethical concerns in AI implicate designers, and what frameworks or considerations can guide their responsibilities? The protocol outlines a rigorous methodological process, including database searches, grey literature analysis, citation tracking, and quality assessments, employing tools such as EndNote, Rayyan, and the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. The outcomes aim to inform actionable ethical frameworks, enhance design practices, and contribute to the broader discourse on responsible AI development. This research seeks to provide normative recommendations and clarify how designers can engage with ethical considerations to foster a morally robust vision for AI-integrated systems.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0