Exploring Resourcefulness of the Paragraph for PrecedenceRetrieval in Legal Documents

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14

This paper analyzes paragraph-level information for legal precedence retrieval, finding that it captures judgment similarity effectively and performs comparably to state-of-the-art methods.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-14 · read from full text

This preprint investigates how paragraph-level information can improve computational judgment similarity for legal precedence retrieval, using statistical analyses on Supreme Court of India judgments and benchmarking on two Indian Supreme Court precedence retrieval datasets. The authors report that methods incorporating only a few paragraph interactions can capture similarity among judgments more discriminately than a baseline document-level approach, while achieving comparable performance to state-of-the-art methods. A stated caveat is that the work is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed by a journal. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Developing computational methods for efficiently extracting relevant legal information to aid legalpractitioners is an active research area. In this regard, research efforts are being made to developefficient methods by leveraging different kinds of information in a legal document, such as meta-data, citations, keywords, sentences, paragraphs, etc. Similar to any text document, legal documentsare composed of paragraphs. In this paper, we have analyzed the resourcefulness of paragraph-levelinformation in capturing similarity among judgments for improving the performance of precedenceretrieval. The statistical analysis on the Supreme Court of India judgment dataset shows that theparagraph-level methods with only a few paragraph interactions could capture the similarity amongthe judgments and exhibit more discriminating power over the baseline document-level method. More-over, the comparison results on two benchmark datasets for the precedence retrieval on the Indiansupreme court judgments task show that the paragraph-level methods exhibit comparable perfor-mance with the state-of-the-art methods by utilizing only a few paragraph interactions. Overall, theresults show that paragraph-level granularity can better represent the legal document, and there is ascope to exploit them to improve the retrieval systems in the legal domain.
Full text 11,842 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Exploring Resourcefulness of the Paragraph for PrecedenceRetrieval in Legal Documents | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Exploring Resourcefulness of the Paragraph for PrecedenceRetrieval in Legal Documents Bhoomeendra Singh Sisodiya, Narendra Babu Unnam, P. Krishna Reddy, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4900252/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 3 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Developing computational methods for efficiently extracting relevant legal information to aid legalpractitioners is an active research area. In this regard, research efforts are being made to developefficient methods by leveraging different kinds of information in a legal document, such as meta-data, citations, keywords, sentences, paragraphs, etc. Similar to any text document, legal documentsare composed of paragraphs. In this paper, we have analyzed the resourcefulness of paragraph-levelinformation in capturing similarity among judgments for improving the performance of precedenceretrieval. The statistical analysis on the Supreme Court of India judgment dataset shows that theparagraph-level methods with only a few paragraph interactions could capture the similarity amongthe judgments and exhibit more discriminating power over the baseline document-level method. More-over, the comparison results on two benchmark datasets for the precedence retrieval on the Indiansupreme court judgments task show that the paragraph-level methods exhibit comparable perfor-mance with the state-of-the-art methods by utilizing only a few paragraph interactions. Overall, theresults show that paragraph-level granularity can better represent the legal document, and there is ascope to exploit them to improve the retrieval systems in the legal domain. Judgment similarity Legal Search Common law Precedence retrieval Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editor assigned by journal 24 Aug, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 13 Aug, 2024 First submitted to journal 12 Aug, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4900252","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":344594845,"identity":"6020aecc-4ca2-49a4-8b41-674839564bcd","order_by":0,"name":"Bhoomeendra Singh Sisodiya","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bhoomeendra","middleName":"Singh","lastName":"Sisodiya","suffix":""},{"id":344594847,"identity":"209c20e3-0623-4be2-a0de-83c0092b88b2","order_by":1,"name":"Narendra Babu Unnam","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Narendra","middleName":"Babu","lastName":"Unnam","suffix":""},{"id":344594849,"identity":"daf96981-3fcc-4e3b-8a4d-c6302f3dfb62","order_by":2,"name":"P. Krishna Reddy","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"P.","middleName":"Krishna","lastName":"Reddy","suffix":""},{"id":344594850,"identity":"c8d930e0-45f0-4daa-97d7-be340fcaea27","order_by":3,"name":"K.V.K. Santhy","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Nalsar University of Law","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"K.V.K.","middleName":"","lastName":"Santhy","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-08-12 11:48:59","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4900252/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4900252/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":64220311,"identity":"178741d5-41a0-498a-94f8-618b502d3eef","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-09-10 11:22:38","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":468359,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"JDSAJournalPaperPrecedenceRetreivalPaper1.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4900252/v1_covered_7047a4ec-b9f0-489d-945f-6e5210173ea9.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Exploring Resourcefulness of the Paragraph for PrecedenceRetrieval in Legal Documents","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"international-journal-of-data-science-and-analytics","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"jdsa","sideBox":"Learn more about [International Journal of Data Science and Analytics](http://link.springer.com/journal/41060)","snPcode":"41060","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/41060/3","title":"International Journal of Data Science and Analytics","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"Judgment similarity, Legal Search, Common law, Precedence retrieval","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4900252/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4900252/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"Developing computational methods for efficiently extracting relevant legal information to aid legalpractitioners is an active research area. In this regard, research efforts are being made to developefficient methods by leveraging different kinds of information in a legal document, such as meta-data, citations, keywords, sentences, paragraphs, etc. Similar to any text document, legal documentsare composed of paragraphs. In this paper, we have analyzed the resourcefulness of paragraph-levelinformation in capturing similarity among judgments for improving the performance of precedenceretrieval. The statistical analysis on the Supreme Court of India judgment dataset shows that theparagraph-level methods with only a few paragraph interactions could capture the similarity amongthe judgments and exhibit more discriminating power over the baseline document-level method. More-over, the comparison results on two benchmark datasets for the precedence retrieval on the Indiansupreme court judgments task show that the paragraph-level methods exhibit comparable perfor-mance with the state-of-the-art methods by utilizing only a few paragraph interactions. Overall, theresults show that paragraph-level granularity can better represent the legal document, and there is ascope to exploit them to improve the retrieval systems in the legal domain.","manuscriptTitle":"Exploring Resourcefulness of the Paragraph for PrecedenceRetrieval in Legal Documents","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-09-10 11:22:28","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4900252/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-08-24T15:15:37+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-08-13T07:58:07+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"International Journal of Data Science and Analytics","date":"2024-08-12T11:47:07+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"international-journal-of-data-science-and-analytics","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"jdsa","sideBox":"Learn more about [International Journal of Data Science and Analytics](http://link.springer.com/journal/41060)","snPcode":"41060","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/41060/3","title":"International Journal of Data Science and Analytics","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"9366349c-4c09-49f1-a354-e281bf6bc6c2","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 10th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-09-10T11:22:29+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-09-10 11:22:28","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4900252","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4900252","identity":"rs-4900252","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"_2-kVJe1T_tPrBINL-cwx","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0