Introduction
The ability to sense and respond to changes in mechanical properties of the
extracellular microenvironment is a fundamental feature of cellular life during
development, homeostasis and diseases (Hannezo and Heisenberg 2019, Narain,
Muncie-Vasic et al. 2025). Mechanosensing and mechanotransduction are particularly
critical for cell types physiologically exposed to dynamic changes in external forces,
such as myofibers in skeletal and cardiac muscle exposed to contraction-relaxation
cycles, endothelial cells exposed to stretch and shear forces from changing pressure
and flow, and lung alveolar cells exposed to cyclical compression during respiration
(Martino, Perestrelo et al. 2018). Metastatic tumor cells must similarly navigate through
stiff microenvironments during extravasation from the primary tumor, intravasation at
metastatic sites and while exposed to flow-associated shear forces in circulation
(Narain, Muncie-Vasic et al. 2025). Adaptive mechanisms that allow such cell types to
withstand harsh mechanical environments and swiftly repair damaged plasma
membrane are therefore of significant interest in understanding physiological systems
and pathological states.
Cell types physiologically exposed to high mechanical stress to the plasma membrane,
including skeletal and cardiac myocytes, endothelial cells and fibroblasts, show an
abundance of caveolae, 50-80 nm diameter cholesterol- and glycosphingolipid-rich
plasma membrane invaginations scaffolded on the cytoplasmic side by Caveolin and
Cavin proteins (Parton 2018, Sotodosos-Alonso, Pulgarin-Alfaro et al. 2023). Studies
using applied external forces and hypo-osmotic conditions have shown a key role for
caveolae in protecting the plasma membrane from mechanical force-induced breaches
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
and their repair (Sinha, Koster et al. 2011). Caveolae-mediated endocytosis also plays a
key role in repairing plasma membrane pores formed by bacterial pore-forming toxins,
by facilitating their lysosomal degradation (Corrotte, Fernandes et al. 2012, Corrotte,
Almeida et al. 2013). More recent studies have validated the physiological
mechanoprotective role of caveolae in vivo. CAV1 knockout studies show that intact
caveolae are required for the integrity of microvascular endothelium, acting against
mechanical rupture induced by increased cardiac output (Cheng, Mendoza-Topaz et al.
2015). Loss of caveolae upon Caveolin or Cavin knockdown was also found to cause
the collapse of vacuolated cells in Zebrafish notochord under mechanical strain of
locomotion (Garcia, Bagwell et al. 2017). Besides their mechanoprotective roles,
caveolae function as hubs for cell signaling, ion and nutrient transport, and receptor
endocytic traffic (Shvets, Ludwig et al. 2014).
Caveolae respond to plasma membrane tension by flattening to relieve strain (Sinha,
Koster et al. 2011), and the related CAV1-containing dolines respond by activating the
YAP/TAZ-TEAD pathway (Moreno-Vicente, Pavon et al. 2018, Lolo, Walani et al. 2023).
The latter mediate positive feedback through TEAD-dependent induction of CAV1 and
CAVIN1 gene expression to sustain caveolae (Dupont, Morsut et al. 2011, Rausch,
Bostrom et al. 2019, Lolo, Walani et al. 2023). The contribution of caveolae in the repair
of plasma membrane injuries has primarily focused on their role as providers of
membrane needed to plug the plasma membrane breaches, either through localized
rearrangements or through endocytic/exocytic processes (Sinha, Koster et al. 2011,
Corrotte, Fernandes et al. 2012, Corrotte, Almeida et al. 2013, Cheng, Mendoza-Topaz
et al. 2015, Garcia, Bagwell et al. 2017, Stefl, Takamiya et al. 2024). In contrast, any
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
roles of caveolae in regulating signaling mechanisms critical for membrane repair are
not well-defined.
While Caveolins and Cavins are the structurally required elements of caveolae,
accessory proteins localized to caveolae are known to regulate their dynamics at the
plasma membrane (Parton 2018, Sotodosos-Alonso, Pulgarin-Alfaro et al. 2023) and
thus are candidates to modulate caveolae function in mechanosensing and
mechanoprotection. The EPS15 Homology Domain containing protein 2 (EHD2)
localizes to and stabilizes the plasma membrane caveolae (Moren, Shah et al. 2012,
Stoeber, Stoeck et al. 2012, Hoernke, Mohan et al. 2017, Yeow, Howard et al. 2017),
and has been shown to rapidly accumulate at sites of laser-induced plasma membrane
lesions in skeletal muscle models, localizing to the shoulder region of the membrane
repair cap together with dysferlin (DYSF) (Marg, Schoewel et al. 2012, Demonbreun,
Quattrocelli et al. 2016). DYSF and its related family members are known to be involved
in plasma membrane repair (Demonbreun and McNally 2016). EHD2 and DYSF interact
physically and were required for myotube fusion (Posey, Pytel et al. 2011). Notably,
hypotonic stress-induced increase in plasma membrane tension was found to induce
rapid translocation of EHD2 into the nucleus and transcriptomic analyses identified
EHD2-dependent changes in gene expression (Torrino, Shen et al. 2018), supporting a
mechanosensitive role of EHD2. Further, NIH-3T3 cells with combined EHD1, 2 and 4
KO, which reduced the cell surface caveolae reservoir, were found to be vulnerable to
PM rupture upon prolonged cyclical stretch (Yeow, Howard et al. 2017). Together, these
findings suggest that EHD2 may play a functional role in plasma membrane repair.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Whether EHD2 is indeed involved in plasma membrane repair and the mechanisms of
such a role are currently unknown.
Our previous studies of the functional role of EHD2 in breast cancer revealed that its
overexpression, found in ~40% of all patients and a majority of HER2+ and triple-
negative (TNBC) subtypes, is associated with shorter patient survival and propensity for
metastasis (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023). Knockdown and knockout analyses in TNBC cell
models established a pro-tumorigenic and pro-metastatic role of EHD2 (Luan, Bielecki
et al. 2023). Mechanistically, we showed that EHD2 was critical to sustain high plasma
membrane levels of Orai1 (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023), a Ca
2+ channel required for
store-operated calcium entry (SOCE). SOCE is a conserved molecular process in
which the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca2+ depletion induces a conformational change
in ER Ca2+ sensor STIM1 to promote its translocation to the ER-plasma membrane (ER-
PM) contact sites where it binds to and activates Orai1 (Ong, Subedi et al. 2019, Lewis
2020). Orai1-mediated Ca
2+ entry promotes Ca2+-dependent signaling and helps refill
the depleted ER stores to protect against unfolded protein response (Elaib, Saller et al.
2016, van Vliet, Giordano et al. 2017). Orai1 is known to reside in and functionally
require the cholesterol-rich and CAV1-containing plasma membrane microdomains
(Sathish, Abcejo et al. 2012, Chantôme, Potier-Cartereau et al. 2013, Jardin and
Rosado 2016, Bohorquez-Hernandez, Gratton et al. 2017). However, whether Orai1-
mediated Ca
2+ entry has any role in caveolae-dependent mechanosensing or
mechanoprotection is unknown.
A potential role of the EHD2-Orai1 axis in caveolae-dependent mechanoprotection is a
question of broad interest as plasma membrane repair across species is well-
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
established to require extracellular Ca2+ entry and to be carried out by Ca2+-dependent
proteins (Cheng, Zhang et al. 2015, Cooper and McNeil 2015, Demonbreun and
McNally 2016, Andrews and Corrotte 2018, Horn and Jaiswal 2018). Based on studies
in model organisms, it is widely accepted that the repair process is initiated by passive
flow of Ca
2+ through the breached plasma membrane down the steep concentration
gradient from the extracellular space (millimolar Ca2+) to the cytoplasm (sub-micromolar
Ca2+) (Cheng, Zhang et al. 2015, Cooper and McNeil 2015, Demonbreun and McNally
2016, Andrews and Corrotte 2018, Horn and Jaiswal 2018). It is also well-established
that the initial sealing of plasma membrane injuries occurs within seconds, but that
subsequent repair, which lasts for an extended duration, continues to be Ca2+-
dependent even though the passive flow of extracellular Ca2+ has ceased (Cheng,
Zhang et al. 2015, Cooper and McNeil 2015, Demonbreun and McNally 2016, Andrews
and Corrotte 2018, Horn and Jaiswal 2018). These late repair steps include the
essential roles of Ca
2+-dependent proteins and Ca2+-dependent movement of exocytic
and endocytic membrane vesicles that help restore the plasma membrane. The sources
of Ca2+ required to complete the membrane repair after initial sealing of the plasma
membrane lesions remain unclear. The lysosomal Ca2+ channel MCOLN1 was found to
be important for plasma membrane repair, yet effective repair still required extracellular
Ca
2+, possibly to replenish lysosomal stores (Cheng, Zhang et al. 2014). It is unknown if
plasma membrane-localized Ca2+ channels contribute to plasma membrane repair.
Recent studies have shown the importance of proteins identified as critical for plasma
membrane repair in other models, such as myoferlin (Leung, Yu et al. 2013), annexins
(Bouvet, Ros et al. 2020, Gounou, Bouvet et al. 2023) and annexin-associated S100
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
family members (Jaiswal, Lauritzen et al. 2014), in plasma membrane repair in tumor
cells. Notably, the acquisition of a more robust plasma membrane repair capacity was
identified as a response to the higher propensity of invasive breast cancer cells to
undergo increased plasma membrane damage (Jaiswal, Lauritzen et al. 2014),
supporting the idea that plasma membrane repair in cancer cells represents a
functionally important mechanoprotective adaptation. As we linked the EHD2-Orai1 axis
to the stability of CAV1-containing plasma membrane domains and invasive/metastatic
behavior of TNBC cells (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023), we utilized these cell models to
examine the role of the EHD2-Orai1 axis in caveolae-dependent mechanoprotection.
Our findings establish that Orai1 and its ability to import the extracellular Ca
2+ into
cytoplasm are required for the repair of plasma membrane injuries induced
mechanically or by a model bacterial pore-forming toxin, streptolysin O (SLO). We
demonstrate that mechanical force applied to the plasma membrane elicits rapid, highly
localized, EHD2 recruitment and Orai1-mediated Ca
2+ influx, identifying the
mechanosensitive nature of the EHD2-Orai1 axis. Finally, we show that stiff extracellular
matrix activation of YAP/TAZ-TEAD signaling requires the EHD2-Orai1 axis-dependent
Ca2+ import, and in turn helps sustain Orai1-mediated mechanosensing and
mechanoprotection. Thus, our studies establish a new paradigm for plasma-membrane-
channel-mediated import of extracellular Ca2+ as an essential component of mammalian
plasma membrane repair and identify a novel mechanosensitive role for EHD2 and
Orai1 in signaling to the YAP/TAZ pathway.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Results
EHD2 is required for efficient repair of plasma membrane injuries induced by
mechanical rupture or streptolysin O
In view of the established role of EHD2 to stabilize the plasma membrane pool of
caveolae (Moren, Shah et al. 2012, Stoeber, Stoeck et al. 2012, Hoernke, Mohan et al.
2017, Yeow, Howard et al. 2017), recruitment of EHD2 to the shoulder region of plasma
membrane repair cap in skeletal muscle injury models (Marg, Schoewel et al. 2012,
Demonbreun, Quattrocelli et al. 2016), mechanical perturbation-induced nuclear
shuttling of EHD2 and its involvement in gene expression (Torrino, Shen et al. 2018), we
posited that EHD2 may be required for plasma membrane repair. We adapted the
scratch wounding protocol commonly used to assess tumor cell migration to examine
mechanically induced plasma membrane injury repair since a large proportion of cells
near the scratch wound border showed the uptake of membrane impermeant
fluorescent dyes, indicative of cells with plasma membrane damage (Fig. 1A, Fig. S1A
& S1B). Incubation of wildtype (WT) MDA-MB231 or Hs578T TNBC cell lines for various
time points in Ca
2+-containing medium demonstrated that most cells that incorporated
the membrane-impermeant fluorescent dye FITC-dextran (i.e., cells with plasma
membrane injury) became impermeant to the subsequently added propidium iodide (PI)
within 1-5 minutes with slower recovery after that (Fig.1B), indicating successful plasma
membrane repair. In contrast, the injured cells incubated in medium without Ca
2+
showed significantly impaired repair (70% vs. 40% cells with repair at 40 min in +Ca2+
vs. -Ca2+ media; p<0.05) (Fig. 1B). Thus, as expected, the TNBC cell models we use
exhibit robust Ca2+-dependent plasma membrane repair. Compared to WT TNBC cells,
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
their EHD2-KO versions exhibited a marked and significant reduction in the levels of
plasma membrane repair (25% vs. 70% repair at 40 min, p<0.01), close to that
observed in WT cells in the absence of Ca2+; absence of Ca2+ further reduced the
plasma membrane repair of EHD2-KO cells, but the difference was smaller (20% vs.
15% in +Ca2+ vs. -Ca2+, p>0.05) (Fig. 1B). To further explore the role of EHD2 in plasma
membrane repair, we used streptolysin O (SLO) to induce plasma membrane pores.
SLO is a prototype bacterial toxin that forms smaller and more uniform plasma
membrane pores that are also repaired in a Ca
2+-dependent process (Cheng, Zhang et
al. 2015, Cooper and McNeil 2015, Demonbreun and McNally 2016, Andrews and
Corrotte 2018, Horn and Jaiswal 2018). Repair was assessed by analyzing the
proportion of cells permeable to PI using FACS analysis. In contrast to WT TNBC cells,
EHD2-KO cells exhibited a significantly higher percentage of PI-high cells (40% vs. 16%
PI+ cells in MDA-MB-231 and 60% vs. 35% PI+ cells in Hs578T; p<0.001), indicating
less efficient repair (Fig. 1C &1D). Notably, EHD2-KO MDA-MB231 cells reconstituted
with mouse EHD2 (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023) showed repair comparable to that in WT
cells (20% vs. 16% PI+ cells; p>0.05) (Fig. 1C &1D). Together, these results led us to
conclude that EHD2 is required for the repair of plasma membrane injuries induced by
mechanical force or a prototype pore-forming bacterial toxin.
Plasma membrane repair is mediated by the activity of Orai1 Ca
2+ channel
Previously, we showed that loss of EHD2 expression leads to lower plasma membrane
levels of Orai1, and the functional impact of the EHD2 loss on cell migration and
tumorigenesis was recapitulated by Orai1 inhibition while overexpression of STIM1
partially rescued the SOCE and cell migration defects in EHD2-KO MDA-MB-231 cells
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
(Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023). We therefore tested the possibility that Orai1 may be
required for EHD2-dependent plasma membrane repair. First, we generated Orai1-KO
derivatives of MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T TNBC cell lines and confirmed the absence of
Orai1 protein expression (Fig. 2A). Similar to our previous findings upon EHD2-KO in
these cell models (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023), the extent of initial Ca2+ release as a
measure of ER Ca2+ stores (50 % reduction in Orai1-KO in MDA-MB-231, p<0.001; 43
% reduction in Orai1-KO in Hs578T, p<0.005) and their SOCE response to Ca2+ store
depletion induced by thapsigargin (~65% reduction in Orai1-KO, p<0.001) (Fig. 2B&
2C), as well as their trans-well cell migration towards serum-containing medium (~60%
reduction in Orai1-KO, p<0.001) (Fig. S2A), were markedly and significantly reduced.
The reduction in ER release reflects a deficit of ER Ca2+ store filling because of
impaired SOCE (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023). Notably, Orai1-KO led to a significant
impairment in the repair of mechanically-induced plasma membrane injuries (65% in WT
vs. 38% in KO MDA-MB-231; 62% in in WT vs. 40% KO Hs578T at 40 min, p<0.01)
(Fig. 2D& 2E, Fig. S2B) and SLO-induced membrane pores (14% PI
+ cells in WT vs.
36% in KO in MDA-MB-231 and 19% PI+ cells in WT vs. 48% in KO in Hs578T;
p<0.001) (Fig. 2F& 2G). Complementing the genetic approach, we also assessed the
impact of Orai1 inhibition. As the tool inhibitors used in previous studies, such as SKF-
96365, lack selectivity (Ramsey, Delling et al. 2006, Ding, Zhang et al. 2012), we
utilized a more recently developed Orai1-selective inhibitor CM4620 which functions by
inhibiting the activated state of Orai1 (Stauderman 2018, Waldron, Chen et al. 2019)
and has progressed through phase 2 clinical trials against acute pancreatitis and
COVID-19 pneumonia (Miller, Bruen et al. 2020, Bruen, Miller et al. 2021, Bruen, Al-
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Saadi et al. 2022). First, we established the Orai1 dependence of the CM4620 effect on
functional readouts of Orai1 activity in TNBC cells. Indeed, CM4620 robustly inhibited
the SOCE (~67% reduction in CM4620-treated vs. control; p<0.001) and cell migration
(~55% reduction with CM4620 vs. control; p<0.001) in WT TNBC cells but had little
impact on the residual cell migration in Orai1-KO cells (185 cells per field with DMSO
vs. 180 cells per field with CM4620, not significant) (Fig. 2H & Fig. S2D). Importantly,
treatment with CM4620 impaired the repair of mechanical (42% in CM4620-treated cells
vs. 74% in control cells, p<0.01) (Fig. 2I & Fig. S2E) as well as SLO-induced (38% PI+
cells in CM4620 vs. 12% PI+ cells in control, p<0.001) (Fig. 2J) plasma membrane
damage in TNBC cells. Together, these results support the conclusion that plasma
membrane Ca
2+ channel Orai1 is required for efficient plasma membrane repair.
EHD2 and Orai1 are required for mechanosensitive spatiotemporally regulated
import of calcium into the cytoplasm
The requirement of EHD2 and Orai1 for plasma membrane repair suggested that these
proteins orchestrate a novel pathway of mechanosensitive entry of Ca2+ from the
extracellular space into the cytoplasm. To test this possibility, we used Atomic Force
Microscopy (AFM) to assess the impact of a mechanical stimulus applied to the plasma
membrane. MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with fluorescent EHD2 were subjected to
nano-indentation with cantilevers and localization of EHD2 over time was monitored by
confocal imaging (Fig. 3A). We observed rapid (within seconds) accumulation of
fluorescent EHD2 precisely at the indentation site (indentation point indicated), which
dissipated quickly once the mechanical force was removed (Fig. 3B & 3C). The focal
accumulation of EHD2 signals was significantly higher compared to the pre-induction
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
signals (~2 fold higher at the peak, p<0.01) (Fig. 3D & 3E). Next, we used MDA-MB-
231 cells transfected with a red fluorescent reporter of cytoplasmic Ca2+ (R-GECO1.2)
(Wu, Liu et al. 2013) to assess if the localized application of force to the plasma
membrane induced Ca2+ import into cytoplasm. We observed rapid Ca2+ entry that
started near the site of the plasma membrane indentation and spread to rest of the cell;
the Ca
2+ entry dissipated quickly when the mechanical stimulus was removed (Fig. 4A).
The mechanosensitive Ca2+ entry was abrogated by genetic KO of EHD2 (~45%
reduction; p<0.01), Orai1 (~40% reduction ; p<0.01) or CAV1 (~55% reduction; p<0.01),
and the defect in EHD2-KO cells was partially rescued by ectopic expression of mouse
Ehd2 (~45% reduction in EHD2-KO vs. 20% reduction in mEhd2-reconstituted cells;
p<0.05) (Fig. 4B). Further, an Orai1 inhibitor CM5480 (Stauderman 2018, Pallagi,
Görög et al. 2022, Szabó, Csákány-Papp et al. 2023), which also exhibited Orai1-
dependent activity in TNBC cells (Fig. S3A), effectively inhibited the mechanosensitive
Ca2+ entry (~85% reduction in CM5480 vs. control, p<0.01) (Fig. 4C). To more directly
interrogate if the mechanosensitive, Orai1-dependent, Ca2+ import observed above
indeed reported the Orai1-mediated Ca2+ entry, we transfected MDA-MB231 with a
genetically encoded fluorescent biosensor, G-GECO1-Orai1 (Dynes, Amcheslavsky et
al. 2016). In this biosensor, the green-fluorescent Ca2+ indicator fused to the N-
terminus of Orai1 itself detects the Orai1-associated Ca2+ influx locally in the
cytoplasmic nanodomain adjacent to the plasma membrane (Dynes, Amcheslavsky et
al. 2016). Transiently transfected G-GECO1-Orai1 showed plasma membrane
localization as expected (Fig. 4D). The G-GECO1-Orai1 also accurately reported only
the SOCE phase of the Ca
2+ influx in response to thapsigargin treatment of MDA-MB-
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
231 cells, which was completely abolished by the selective Orai1 inhibitor CM5480 (Fig.
S3B). Indentation of the plasma membrane led to marked, and statistically-significant,
increase in Ca2+ influx reported by G-GECO1-Orai1 (6.2-fold increase in signal over
unstimulated cells; p<0.001) (Fig. 4D). Pretreatment of cells with CM5480 led to a
highly significant inhibition of G-GECO1-Orai1 fluorescence upon indentation (1-fold-
change in CM5480-treated cells vs. 6.2-fold change in control; p<0.001) (Fig. 4D).
These results conclusively establish that mechanical force applied to the plasma
membrane leads to Orai1 activation. Since Orai Ca
2+ channels are gated by STIM
proteins (Ong, Subedi et al. 2019, Lewis 2020), we asked if STIM proteins are required
for mechano-sensitive Orai1 activation. In MDA-MB231 cells, both STIM1 and STIM2
were robustly expressed, and siRNA KD of STIM2 led to a substantial upregulation of
STIM1 expression (Fig. S3C). Concurrent STIM1 and STIM2 siRNA transfection in
MDA-MB231 cells expressing R-GECO1.2 led to efficient knockdown of both STIM1 and
2 (Fig. S3D) and effectively abolished the plasma membrane indentation induced Ca
2+
influx (Fig. 4E). These results establish that EHD2-, CAV1- and Orai1-dependent
mechano-sensitive Ca2+ entry is indeed mediated by Orai1 and dependent on STIM
proteins. Altogether, these results identify EHD2 and Orai1 as components of a novel
axis that mediates mechanosensitive Ca2+ import from the extracellular space into the
cytoplasm with high spatial and temporal control.
EHD2-Orai1 axis is required for mechanosensitive activation of the YAP/TAZ-
TEAD pathway
Mechanical cell strain, the primary driver of plasma membrane damage, is typically
elevated in stiff extracellular microenvironments, including in tumors (Lachowski,
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Matellan et al. 2022, Lee, Yun et al. 2025). Recent work has established that application
of mechanical force to plasma membrane induces CAV1-dependent YAP/TAZ-TEAD
pathway activation (Dupont, Morsut et al. 2011, Rausch, Bostrom et al. 2019, Lolo,
Walani et al. 2023), and there is emerging support for Ca2+ as a potential intermediate
to positively or negatively modulate such mechanosensitive YAP/TAZ activation (Wei
and Li 2021). Importantly, the downstream targets of mechanosensitive YAP/TAZ-TEAD
activation include CAV1 and CAVIN1 in positive feedback that was found to be essential
to sustain high levels of plasma membrane caveolae (Dupont, Morsut et al. 2011,
Rausch, Bostrom et al. 2019, Lolo, Walani et al. 2023). Our findings that EHD2 and
Orai1 are required for mechanosensitive Ca
2+ entry from the extracellular space into
cytoplasm raised the possibility that EHD2-Orai1 axis serves as a mechanosensitive
activator of YAP/TAZ signaling. As reported (Moreno-Vicente, Pavon et al. 2018), culture
of WT MDA-MB231 cells on stiff matrix (64 kPa) induced the nuclear translocation of
YAP compared to cells cultured on soft hydrogel (0.2 kPa) (~6 fold higher
nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio of YAP staining on 64 kPa vs. 0.2 kPa hydrogel, p<0.001)
(Fig. 5A& 5B, Fig. S5). Analysis of KO cell lines revealed that while YAP nuclear
translocation was still significantly higher on stiff compared to soft matrix
(nuclear/cytoplasmic YAP ratio ~1.5 fold higher in EHD2-KO, ~3 fold higher in Orai1-KO
and ~4 fold higher in Cav1-KO;p<0.001) (Fig. 5A& 5B, Fig. S5), the extent of YAP
nuclear translocation in EHD2-KO, Orai1-KO and CAV1-KO MDA-MB-231 cells was
significantly reduced compared to that in WT cells (~83% reduction in EHD2-KO vs. WT,
~ 86% reduction in Orai1-KO vs. WT, ~ 78% reduction in CAV1-KO vs. WT on 64 kPa
matrix; p<0.001) (Fig. 5A& 5B, Fig. S5 ). Notably, mouse Ehd2 expression in EHD2-KO
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
cells partially restored the YAP nuclear translocation (~3.5-fold increase in mouse Ehd2-
rescued vs. 1.5-fold increase in EHD2-KO cells on 64 kPa matrix; p<0.001) (Fig. 5B).
Treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with Orai1 inhibitors CM4620 or CM5480 also
abrogated the nuclear translocation of YAP (~50% reduction with CM4620 vs. control,
~46% reduction with CM5480 vs. control, p<0.001) (Fig. 5C), validating the results of
genetic KOs. To assess the impact of EHD2-KO or Orai1-KO on YAP/TAZ-TEAD
pathway activity, we determined the activity of a transiently transfected TEAD pathway
luciferase reporter in cells grown on stiff matrix. Both EHD2-KO and Orai1-KO
significantly reduced the reporter activity (~40% reduction compared to WT, p <0.01;
Fig. 5D). We further examined the induction of established TEAD target genes,
including CAV1 and CAVIN1, the structurally essential components of caveolae, as
indicators of the positive feedback loop between caveolae and YAP/TZ-TEAD (Dupont,
Morsut et al. 2011, Rausch, Bostrom et al. 2019, Lolo, Walani et al. 2023), using qPCR.
The stiff ECM-dependent TEAD target gene expression was significantly impaired by
KO of EHD2, or Orai1 (~52% decrease of CTGF, ~53% decrease of CYR61, ~85%
decrease of ANKRD1, ~50% decrease of CAV1 and ~40% decrease of CAVIN1 in
EHD2-KO vs. WT; ~82% decrease of CTGF, ~86% decrease of CYR61, ~90%
decrease of ANKRD1, 45% decrease of CAV1 and 40% decrease of CAVIN1 in Orai1-
KO vs. WT; p<0.001) (Fig. 5E).
To further confirm the positive feedback between EHD2/Orai1 regulated YAP/TAZ-TEAD
pathway activity and the expression of caveolar proteins CAV1 and CAVIN1 seen in
TNBC cells with gene KOs, we examined the impact of pharmacological inhibition of
TEAD. Treatment of MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T TNBC cells with an allosteric pan-TEAD
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
inhibitor GNE-7883 (Hagenbeek, Zbieg et al. 2023) for 72 hours resulted in a significant
reduction in the levels of CAV1 (50% reduction compared to control; p<0.01) (Fig. 6A).
GNE-7883 treatment in both MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T cell lines significantly reduced
the thapsigargin-induced SOCE (28% reduction compared to control in MDA-MB-231
cells and 23% reduction in Hs578T cells; p<0.01) (Fig. 6B-C). GNE-7883 treatment of
MDA-MB-231 cells for 24 hours also significantly impaired the Ca2+ uptake induced by
AFM-induced mechanical stimulus to the plasma membrane (6.5-fold Ca2+ influx
increase in DMSO vs. 2.5-fold Ca2+ influx increase in GNE-7883 treatment, p<0.001)
(Fig. 6D). Finally, short-term GNE-7883 treatment significantly impaired the ability of
MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T cells to repair the mechanically-induced (65% repair in
control vs. 56% in treated MDA-MB-231 cells at 40 min; 65% repair in control vs. 50% in
treated Hs578T cells at 40 min; p <0.05) (Fig. 6E, Fig. S6) and SLO-induced (13% PI+
cells in control vs. 17% in treated MDA-MB-231 cells; 35% PI+ cells in control vs. 58%
in treated Hs578T cells; p <0.05) (Fig. 6F) plasma membrane injuries.
Altogether, we find that in addition to an essential role of EHD2-Orai1 axis in acute
response to plasma membrane strain, long-term exposure of cells to stiff
microenvironment induces EHD2-Orai1 and YAP/TAZ-TEAD axis dependent
mechanoadaptation to counteract plasma membrane damage.
Discussion
The ability to promptly repair plasma membrane breaches is essential for the life of
organisms without a cell wall (Cooper and McNeil 2015, Demonbreun and McNally
2016, Andrews and Corrotte 2018). Ca
2+ inflow from the extracellular space is required
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
to initiate and complete the plasma membrane repair processes (Cheng, Zhang et al.
2015, Cooper and McNeil 2015, Demonbreun and McNally 2016, Andrews and Corrotte
2018, Horn and Jaiswal 2018). The passive inflow of Ca2+ from the extracellular space
into cytoplasm is thought to be the initial trigger to initiate the repair. Whether plasma
membrane-localized Ca2+ channels have any role in plasma membrane repair is not
known. Studies presented here establish that the plasma membrane Ca2+ channel
Orai1, a mediator of store-operated Ca2+ entry, is essential for mammalian plasma
membrane repair. We also establish that EHD2, a caveolae-associated protein required
to sustain high plasma membrane levels of Orai1 (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023), is also
essential for mammalian plasma membrane repair. Importantly, we show that EHD2 and
Orai1 function as required upstream components of a mechanotransduction cascade to
activate YAP/TAZ-TEAD signaling. Collectively, our findings identify novel roles of Orai1-
mediated Ca
2+ transport to sustain Ca2+-dependent mammalian plasma membrane
repair (Cheng, Zhang et al. 2015, Cooper and McNeil 2015, Demonbreun and McNally
2016, Andrews and Corrotte 2018, Horn and Jaiswal 2018) and for activation of
YAP/TAZ-TEAD pathway of mechanoadaptation (Dupont, Morsut et al. 2011, Rausch,
Bostrom et al. 2019, Lolo, Walani et al. 2023).
The role of Orai1 (or its family members Orai2/3), in partnership with STIM1 (or STIM2)
in SOCE is well-established, but this role has almost exclusively been investigated in
the context of responses to biochemical signaling, such as cell surface receptor
activation (Ong, Subedi et al. 2019, Lewis 2020). In contrast, there is little evidence for a
primary role for Orai channels in cellular responses to mechanical stimuli. However,
prior studies have suggested the role of Orai1 secondary to activation of other
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
mechanosensitive Ca2+ channels. For example, Ca2+ entry induced by
mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel agonist Yoda-2 in endometrial mesenchymal stem
cells was shown to be dampened by 2-APB, an inhibitor of Orai channel-mediated
SOCE (Chubinskiy-Nadezhdin, Semenova et al. 2022). In a study using an in vivo
paradigm of flow shear-dependent mechanotransduction, Orai1-KO embryos displayed
reduced lymphatic density and impaired lymphatic development (Choi, Park et al. 2017).
Further studies demonstrated that Piezo1 channel served in the mechanosensory role,
with Orai1 mediating the subsequent SOCE (Choi, Park et al. 2017). We show that
direct application of mechanical force to the plasma membrane initiates rapid Ca
2+
import that is completely abrogated by Orai1-KO as well as by Orai1 channel-selective
inhibitors (Fig. 4A-C). We have previously established that loss of EHD2 leads to
reduced SOCE, with a reduction in the plasma membrane pool of Orai1 while the total
Orai1 levels were unchanged (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023). Indeed, the mechanosensitive
Ca2+ entry was also lost upon EHD2-KO (Fig. 4B). Consistent with Orai1 localization to
CAV1-containing plasma membrane domains (Sathish, Abcejo et al. 2012, Chantôme,
Potier-Cartereau et al. 2013, Jardin and Rosado 2016, Bohorquez-Hernandez, Gratton
et al. 2017), we observed loss of mechanosensitive Ca2+ entry upon CAV1-KO (Fig.
4B). Mechanosensitivity of Ca2+ import through G-GECO1-Orai1, a genetically-encoded
Ca2+ biosensor that reports direct Ca2+ influx through Orai1 (Dynes, Amcheslavsky et al.
2016), (Fig. 4D) further substantiates the role of Orai1 in mechanosensitive Ca2+ entry
across the plasma membrane. We further demonstrate the mechano-sensitive, Orai1-
mediated Ca2+ entry to require STIM proteins, indicating that such Ca2+ transport occurs
at ER-PM contacts, where STIM proteins are known to interact with and activate Orai1
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
(Ong, Subedi et al. 2019, Lewis 2020). Collectively, our results define a new
mechanosensitive role for plasma membrane caveolae-localized Orai1. The absence of
a retained intracellular store Ca2+ release component upon mechanical indentation of
Orai1-, EHD2- or CAV1-KO cell models argues against the likelihood of a distinct
mechanosensitive Ca2+ channel mediating the initial Ca2+ release with Orai1 functioning
in a classical role as an SOCE channel in our cell system. However, given the findings
in Orai1-KO mice discussed above, it remains possible that mechanosensitive proteins,
including the known mechanosensitive Ca
2+ channels, are involved in Orai1 activation in
response to mechanical stimuli. A systematic analysis of candidate mechanosensitive
Ca2+ channels and accessory proteins will be needed to clarify this further.
Given the accumulation of EHD2 at plasma membrane repair sites in skeletal muscle
models (Marg, Schoewel et al. 2012, Demonbreun, Quattrocelli et al. 2016), our findings
in cancer cells suggest a comparable role of EHD2 in other cell types with known roles
of caveolae in plasma membrane repair (Sinha, Koster et al. 2011, Corrotte, Fernandes
et al. 2012, Corrotte, Almeida et al. 2013, Shvets, Ludwig et al. 2014, Cheng, Mendoza-
Topaz et al. 2015, Garcia, Bagwell et al. 2017). More importantly, our results raise the
possibility of a broader and essential role of Orai1 in caveolae-dependent repair across
cell types and organisms. Whether EHD2 functions as an obligate partner in such a role
remains to be determined; while EHD2 and CAV1 proteins are coordinately expressed
in breast cancer cell lines (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023) and CAV1/CAVIN1 and EHD2
mRNAs show strong co-expression across cell types, EHD2 and Orai1 mRNA
expression is not similarly correlated (based on single cell portal and mRNA co-
expression databases). Consistent with EHD2-independent Orai1 function in membrane
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
repair, the residual repair in EHD2-KO cells was still Ca2+ dependent (Fig. 1B), likely
reflecting the reduction but not a complete absence of cell surface Orai1 in these cells
(Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023). Further analyses in naturally EHD2-low/non-expressing cell
systems will be required to explore this further.
Prior work has established the YAP/TAZ-TEAD pathway as a major mechanosensitive
signaling axis in response to ECM stiffness, shear stress and cell stretching in a manner
independent of the upstream Hippo pathway kinases (Dupont, Morsut et al. 2011,
Rausch, Bostrom et al. 2019, Lolo, Walani et al. 2023). CAV1 was identified as a critical
upstream positive regulator of such mechanosensitive YAP/TAZ-TEAD pathway
activation (Moreno-Vicente, Pavon et al. 2018). Consistent with the required role of
EHD2 to stabilize plasma membrane caveolae (Sathish, Abcejo et al. 2012, Chantôme,
Potier-Cartereau et al. 2013, Jardin and Rosado 2016, Bohorquez-Hernandez, Gratton
et al. 2017), we found that deletion of EHD2 impaired the stiff ECM dependent YAP
nuclear translocation, phenocopying the impact of CAV1-KO (Fig. 5A-B). Importantly,
we found that Orai1-KO or its inhibition also impaired the YAP translocation induced by
stiff ECM (Fig. 5C). Further, EHD2-KO or Orai1-KO reduced the stiff ECM induced
TEAD target gene expression (Fig. 5D). These findings establish a novel requirement of
EHD2 and Orai1 in mechanosensitive YAP/TAZ-TEAD activation. Combining insights
from our earlier study linking EHD2 and Orai1 (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023), and our
findings here, we propose that EHD2-mediated stabilization of CAV1-containing plasma
membrane domains places Orai1 at mechanosensitive plasma membrane domains and
that mechanical stimuli activate Orai1 as a required step in YAP/TAZ-TEAD pathway
activation. Orai1-mediated Ca
2+ import in the context of cell surface receptor activation
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
as a trigger to regulate multiple cellular signaling pathways is well established, including
several transcriptional regulatory pathways (Nieto-Felipe, Macias-Diaz et al. 2023). The
critical role of Orai1 as an upstream positive regulator of YAP/TAZ-TEAD pathway
activation, as we identify here, therefore provides a novel paradigm to understand
CAV1-dependent mechanosensitive signaling. Consistent with this suggestion,
mechanosensitive YAP/TAZ-TEAD activation was found to require Rho GTPase activity
and actomyosin cytoskeletal contractility (Dupont, Morsut et al. 2011), which in turn are
known be regulated by mechanosensitive Ca
2+ fluxes (Higashida, Kiuchi et al. 2013,
Pardo-Pastor, Rubio-Moscardo et al. 2018, Lakk and Krizaj 2021, Miroshnikova, Manet
et al. 2021, Varadarajan, Chumki et al. 2022, Fu, Wang et al. 2024).
Prior studies have shown that YAP/TAZ-TEAD pathway is required for the expression of
structural components of caveolae, CAV1 and CAVIN1, and inhibition of YAP/TAZ-TEAD
axis led to loss of plasma membrane caveolae (Dupont, Morsut et al. 2011, Rausch,
Bostrom et al. 2019, Lolo, Walani et al. 2023). More recently, mild to moderate
mechanical plasma membrane stress was shown to activate YAP/TAZ-TEAD pathway
through CAV1-containing but CAVIN1-negative plasma membrane dolines as a
mechanoadaptation mechanism through feedback upregulation of CAV1 and CAVIN1
gene expression to increase the CAV1/CAVIN1-containing plasma membrane caveolae,
which are required for mechanical protection against more severe plasma membrane
stress (Dupont, Morsut et al. 2011, Rausch, Bostrom et al. 2019, Lolo, Walani et al.
2023). Consistent with EHD2-Orai1 axis as an intermediary in such mechanoadaptive
positive feedback, stiff matrix-induced CAV1 and CAVIN1 gene expression was reduced
by EHD2 or Orai1 KO (Fig. 5E). Further supporting this mechanism downstream of the
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
EHD2-Orai1 axis, even short-term pharmacological TEAD inhibition reduced the levels
of CAV1/CAVIN1 proteins (Fig. 6A) and the SOCE response elicited upon ER Ca2+
store depletion (using thapsigargin) (Fig. 6B-C ), Remarkably, TEAD inhibition
significantly impaired the Ca2+ import in response to plasma membrane force
application (Fig. 6E-F), expanding the YAP/TAZ-TEAD mediated feedback to the EHD2-
Orai1-dependent mechanosensitive Ca2+ import, which in turn our findings establish as
essential for YAP/TAZ-TEAD pathway activation.
Our findings that EHD2 is required for rapid Orai1 activation in response to mechanical
force applied to the plasma membrane (Fig. 4A) are consistent with the requirement of
EHD2 to sustain the plasma membrane pool of caveolae (Sathish, Abcejo et al. 2012,
Chantôme, Potier-Cartereau et al. 2013, Jardin and Rosado 2016, Bohorquez-
Hernandez, Gratton et al. 2017) and our previous work that EHD2 is required to sustain
high plasma membrane levels of Orai1 (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023). However, our finding
of rapid EHD2 recruitment to plasma membrane sites of applied mechanical force (Fig.
3B) differs from previous findings of CAV1-dependent modest or substantial release of
EHD2 from the plasma membrane in response to cyclical stretch or hypotonic stress,
respectively, with sumo modification of EHD2 leading to its nuclear localization (Torrino,
Shen et al. 2018). The discordant results may reflect our use of transiently applied
localized mechanical force as opposed to more prolonged cell-wide mechanical
stimulation in prior studies and will need further investigation. That mechanosensitive
Orai1 activation, which occurs at the plasma membrane, requires EHD2, strongly
argues for the observed mechanosensitive role of EHD2 at the plasma membrane
rather than through nuclear localization. In prior work, we found that high nuclear
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
staining of EHD2 in breast cancer tissues was associated with longer patient survival,
diametrically opposite to the association of high non-nuclear EHD2 overexpression with
shorter patient survival (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023). Thus, the nuclear localization of
EHD2 in response to mechanical stress may reflect its sequestration for later utilization
in plasma membrane-associated functions. Indeed, the prior study discussed above
(Torrino, Shen et al. 2018) found rapid exit of EHD2 from the nucleus and its re-
localization to plasma membrane during recovery from hypotonic stress. Further, NIH-
3T3 cells rendered caveolae-deficient by the combined EHD1, 2 and 4 KO exhibited
susceptibility or membrane ruptures upon prolonged cyclical stretching (Yeow, Howard
et al. 2017).
An unresolved question is how the mechanical force applied to plasma membrane might
activate Orai1 in an EHD2-dependent and STIM-dependent manner. Changes in
membrane curvature sensed by curvature sensing proteins are well known to affect
cellular responses (McMahon and Boucrot 2015). For example, mechanosensitive
Piezo1 Ca
2+ channel was found enriched at plasma membrane invaginations and
depleted at filopodia (Yang, Miao et al. 2022). Recently, use of vertical pillars to induce
plasma membrane curvature changes mimicking the cardiomyocyte plasma membrane
transverse tubules, sites enriched for ER-PM contacts, was found to induce ER-PM
contacts through junctophilin proteins; interaction of junctophilin-2 with EHD proteins
was identified as a mechanism for curvature sensing to promote ER-PM contact
enrichment (Yang, Valencia et al. 2024). Thus, it is plausible that mechanical force
induced curvature on the plasma membrane recruits EHD2 to promote rapid ER-PM
contact formation or stabilization to promote STIM1-Orai1 interaction and
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
mechanosensitive Ca2+ entry. While studies in cardiomyocytes showed junctophilin-2
interaction with multiple EHD proteins, and EHD4 was functionally implicated, these
other family members are expressed in parental as well as EHD2-KO breast cancer cell
models used here (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023) and do not appear to compensate for the
role of EHD2. It is possible that the requirement of EHD2 for high PM Orai1 expression
(Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023) contributes to this relative specificity.
In conclusion, our findings establish the EHD2-Orai1 duo as a novel regulator of
mechanosensitive import of extracellular Ca
2+ essential for efficient mammalian cell
plasma membrane repair. We also establish the EHD2-Orai11 axis as a critical
upstream element required for the activation of mechanosensitive YAP/TAZ-TEAD
dependent gene expression for mechanoadaptation. Further studies of this novel
plasma membrane mechanosensory apparatus are likely to reveal key new insights into
mechanotransduction and regulation of plasma membrane homeostasis under
physiological states and in diseases, such as cancer.
References
Andrews, N. W. and M. Corrotte (2018). "Plasma membrane repair." Curr Biol 28(8):
R392–R397.
Bohorquez-Hernandez, A., E. Gratton, J. Pacheco, A. Asanov and L. Vaca (2017).
"Cholesterol modulates the cellular localization of Orai1 channels and its disposition
among membrane domains." Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids 1862(12):
1481–1490.
Bouvet, F., M. Ros, E. Bonedeau, C. Croissant, L. Frelin, F. Saltel, V. Moreau and A.
Bouter (2020). "Defective membrane repair machinery impairs survival of invasive
cancer cells." Sci Rep
10(1): 21821.
Bruen, C., M. Al-Saadi, E. A. Michelson, M. Tanios, R. Mendoza-Ayala, J. Miller, J.
Zhang, K. Stauderman, S. Hebbar and P. C. Hou (2022). "Auxora vs. placebo for the
treatment of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a randomized-controlled
clinical trial." Crit Care
26(1): 101.
Bruen, C., J. Miller, J. Wilburn, C. Mackey, T. L. Bollen, K. Stauderman and S. Hebbar
(2021). "Auxora for the Treatment of Patients With Acute Pancreatitis and
Accompanying Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome: Clinical Development of a
Calcium Release-Activated Calcium Channel Inhibitor." Pancreas
50(4): 537–543.
Chantôme, A., M. Potier-Cartereau, L. Clarysse, G. Fromont, S. Marionneau-Lambot, M.
Guéguinou, J. C. Pagès, C. Collin, T. Oullier, A. Girault, F. Arbion, J. P. Haelters, P. A.
Jaffrès, M. Pinault, P. Besson, V. Joulin, P . Bougnoux and C. Vandier (2013). "Pivotal
role of the lipid Raft SK3-Orai1 complex in human cancer cell migration and bone
metastases." Cancer Res 73(15): 4852–4861.
Cheng, J. P ., C. Mendoza-Topaz, G. Howard, J. Chadwick, E. Shvets, A. S. Cowburn, B.
J. Dunmore, A. Crosby, N. W. Morrell and B. J. Nichols (2015). "Caveolae protect
endothelial cells from membrane rupture during increased cardiac output." J Cell Biol
211(1): 53–61.
Cheng, X., X. Zhang, Q. Gao, M. Ali Samie, M. Azar, W. L. Tsang, L. Dong, N. Sahoo, X.
Li, Y . Zhuo, A. G. Garrity, X. Wang, M. Ferrer, J. Dowling, L. Xu, R. Han and H. Xu
(2014). "The intracellular Ca(2)(+) channel MCOLN1 is required for sarcolemma repair
to prevent muscular dystrophy." Nat Med
20(10): 1187–1192.
Cheng, X., X. Zhang, L. Yu and H. Xu (2015). "Calcium signaling in membrane repair."
Semin Cell Dev Biol 45: 24–31.
Choi, D., E. Park, E. Jung, Y. J. Seong, M. Hong, S. Lee, J. Burford, G. Gyarmati, J.
Peti-Peterdi, S. Srikanth, Y. Gwack, C. J. Koh, E. Boriushkin, A. Hamik, A. K. Wong and
Y. K. Hong (2017). "ORAI1 Activates Proliferation of Lymphatic Endothelial Cells in
Response to Laminar Flow Through Kruppel-Like Factors 2 and 4." Circ Res
120(9):
1426–1439.
Chubinskiy-Nadezhdin, V., S. Semenova, V. Vasileva, A. Shatrova, N. Pugovkina and Y.
Negulyaev (2022). "Store-Operated Ca(2+) Entry Contributes to Piezo1-Induced Ca(2+)
Increase in Human Endometrial Stem Cells." Int J Mol Sci
23(7).
Cooper, S. T. and P. L. McNeil (2015). "Membrane Repair: Mechanisms and
Pathophysiology." Physiol Rev
95(4): 1205–1240.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Corrotte, M., P . E. Almeida, C. Tam, T. Castro-Gomes, M. C. Fernandes, B. A. Millis, M.
Cortez, H. Miller, W. Song, T. K. Maugel and N. W. Andrews (2013). "Caveolae
internalization repairs wounded cells and muscle fibers." Elife 2: e00926.
Corrotte, M., M. C. Fernandes, C. Tam and N. W. Andrews (2012). "Toxin pores
endocytosed during plasma membrane repair traffic into the lumen of MVBs for
degradation." Traffic 13(3): 483–494.
Demonbreun, A. R. and E. M. McNally (2016). "Plasma Membrane Repair in Health and
Disease." Curr Top Membr 77: 67–96.
Demonbreun, A. R., M. Quattrocelli, D. Y . Barefield, M. V. Allen, K. E. Swanson and E.
M. McNally (2016). "An actin-dependent annexin complex mediates plasma membrane
repair in muscle." J Cell Biol 213(6): 705–718.
Ding, J., J. R. Zhang, Y. Wang, C. L. Li, D. Lu, S. M. Guan and J. Chen (2012). "Effects
of a non-selective TRPC channel blocker, SKF-96365, on melittin-induced spontaneous
persistent nociception and inflammatory pain hypersensitivity." Neurosci Bull 28(2):
173–181.
Dupont, S., L. Morsut, M. Aragona, E. Enzo, S. Giulitti, M. Cordenonsi, F. Zanconato, J.
Le Digabel, M. Forcato, S. Bicciato, N. Elvassore and S. Piccolo (2011). "Role of
YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction." Nature
474(7350): 179–183.
Dynes, J. L., A. Amcheslavsky and M. D. Cahalan (2016). "Genetically targeted single-
channel optical recording reveals multiple Orai1 gating states and oscillations in calcium
influx." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(2): 440–445.
Elaib, Z., F. Saller and R. Bobe (2016). "The Calcium Entry-Calcium Refilling Coupling."
Adv Exp Med Biol 898: 333–352.
Fu, R., W. Wang, Y. Huo, L. Li, R. Chen, Z. Lin, Y . Tao, X. Peng, W. Huang and C. Guo
(2024). "The mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1 contributes to podocyte cytoskeleton
remodeling and development of proteinuria in lupus nephritis." Kidney Int 106(4): 625–
639.
Garcia, J., J. Bagwell, B. Njaine, J. Norman, D. S. Levic, S. Wopat, S. E. Miller, X. Liu, J.
W. Locasale, D. Y . R. Stainier and M. Bagnat (2017). "Sheath Cell Invasion and Trans-
differentiation Repair Mechanical Damage Caused by Loss of Caveolae in the Zebrafish
Notochord." Curr Biol 27(13): 1982–1989 e1983.
Gounou, C., F. Bouvet, B. Liet, V. Prouzet-Mauleon, L. d'Agata, E. Harte, F. Argoul, G.
Siegfried, R. Iggo, A. M. Khatib and A. Bouter (2023). "Annexin-A5 and annexin-A6
silencing prevents metastasis of breast cancer cells in zebrafish." Biol Cell 115(6):
e202200110.
Hagenbeek, T. J., J. R. Zbieg, M. Hafner, R. Mroue, J. A. Lacap, N. M. Sodir, C. L.
Noland, S. Afghani, A. Kishore, K. P. Bhat, X. Yao, S. Schmidt, S. Clausen, M. Steffek,
W. Lee, P. Beroza, S. Martin, E. Lin, R. Fong, P. Di Lello, M. H. Kubala, M. N. Yang, J. T.
Lau, E. Chan, A. Arrazate, L. An, E. Levy, M. N. Lorenzo, H. J. Lee, T. H. Pham, Z.
Modrusan, R. Zang, Y. C. Chen, M. Kabza, M. Ahmed, J. Li, M. T. Chang, D. Maddalo,
M. Evangelista, X. Ye, J. J. Crawford and A. Dey (2023). "An allosteric pan-TEAD
inhibitor blocks oncogenic YAP/TAZ signaling and overcomes KRAS G12C inhibitor
resistance." Nat Cancer
4(6): 812–828.
Hannezo, E. and C. P. Heisenberg (2019). "Mechanochemical Feedback Loops in
Development and Disease." Cell
178(1): 12–25.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Higashida, C., T. Kiuchi, Y . Akiba, H. Mizuno, M. Maruoka, S. Narumiya, K. Mizuno and
N. Watanabe (2013). "F- and G-actin homeostasis regulates mechanosensitive actin
nucleation by formins." Nat Cell Biol 15(4): 395–405.
Hoernke, M., J. Mohan, E. Larsson, J. Blomberg, D. Kahra, S. Westenhoff, C.
Schwieger and R. Lundmark (2017). "EHD2 restrains dynamics of caveolae by an ATP-
dependent, membrane-bound, open conformation." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114(22):
E4360–e4369.
Horn, A. and J. K. Jaiswal (2018). "Cellular mechanisms and signals that coordinate
plasma membrane repair." Cell Mol Life Sci 75(20): 3751–3770.
Jaiswal, J. K., S. P. Lauritzen, L. Scheffer, M. Sakaguchi, J. Bunkenborg, S. M. Simon,
T. Kallunki, M. Jaattela and J. Nylandsted (2014). "S100A11 is required for efficient
plasma membrane repair and survival of invasive cancer cells." Nat Commun 5: 3795.
Jardin, I. and J. A. Rosado (2016). "STIM and calcium channel complexes in cancer."
Biochim Biophys Acta 1863(6 Pt B): 1418–1426.
Lachowski, D., C. Matellan, S. Gopal, E. Cortes, B. K. Robinson, A. Saiani, A. F. Miller,
M. M. Stevens and A. E. Del Rio Hernandez (2022). "Substrate Stiffness-Driven
Membrane Tension Modulates Vesicular Trafficking via Caveolin-1." ACS Nano 16(3):
4322–4337.
Lakk, M. and D. Krizaj (2021). "TRPV4-Rho signaling drives cytoskeletal and focal
adhesion remodeling in trabecular meshwork cells." Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 320(6):
C1013–C1030.
Lee, J. H., Y . G. Yun and H. W. Kim (2025). "Matrix-induced nuclear remodeling and
mechano-therapeutics." Cell Rep 44(9): 116176.
Leung, C., C. Yu, M. I. Lin, C. Tognon and P. Bernatchez (2013). "Expression of
myoferlin in human and murine carcinoma tumors: role in membrane repair, cell
proliferation, and tumorigenesis." Am J Pathol 182(5): 1900–1909.
Lewis, R. S. (2020). "Store-Operated Calcium Channels: From Function to Structure
and Back Again." Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol
12(5).
Lolo, F. N., N. Walani, E. Seemann, D. Zalvidea, D. M. Pavon, G. Cojoc, M. Zamai, C.
Viaris de Lesegno, F. Martinez de Benito, M. Sanchez-Alvarez, J. J. Uriarte, A. Echarri,
D. Jimenez-Carretero, J. C. Escolano, S. A. Sanchez, V. R. Caiolfa, D. Navajas, X.
Trepat, J. Guck, C. Lamaze, P. Roca-Cusachs, M. M. Kessels, B. Qualmann, M. Arroyo
and M. A. Del Pozo (2023). "Caveolin-1 dolines form a distinct and rapid caveolae-
independent mechanoadaptation system." Nat Cell Biol
25(1): 120–133.
Luan, H., T. A. Bielecki, B. C. Mohapatra, N. Islam, I. Mushtaq, A. M. Bhat, S. Mirza, S.
Chakraborty, M. Raza, M. D. Storck, M. S. Toss, J. L. Meza, W. B. Thoreson, D. W.
Coulter, E. A. Rakha, V. Band and H. Band (2023). "EHD2 overexpression promotes
tumorigenesis and metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer by regulating store-
operated calcium entry." Elife
12.
Marg, A., V. Schoewel, T. Timmel, A. Schulze, C. Shah, O. Daumke and S. Spuler
(2012). "Sarcolemmal repair is a slow process and includes EHD2." Traffic 13(9): 1286–
1294.
Martino, F., A. R. Perestrelo, V. Vinarsky, S. Pagliari and G. Forte (2018). "Cellular
Mechanotransduction: From Tension to Function." Front Physiol 9: 824.
McMahon, H. T. and E. Boucrot (2015). "Membrane curvature at a glance." J Cell Sci
128(6): 1065–1070.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Miller, J., C. Bruen, M. Schnaus, J. Zhang, S. Ali, A. Lind, Z. Stoecker, K. Stauderman
and S. Hebbar (2020). "Auxora versus standard of care for the treatment of severe or
critical COVID-19 pneumonia: results from a randomized controlled trial." Crit Care
24(1): 502.
Miroshnikova, Y. A., S. Manet, X. Li, S. A. Wickstrom, E. Faurobert and C. Albiges-Rizo
(2021). "Calcium signaling mediates a biphasic mechanoadaptive response of
endothelial cells to cyclic mechanical stretch." Mol Biol Cell
32(18): 1724–1736.
Moren, B., C. Shah, M. T. Howes, N. L. Schieber, H. T. McMahon, R. G. Parton, O.
Daumke and R. Lundmark (2012). "EHD2 regulates caveolar dynamics via ATP-driven
targeting and oligomerization." Mol Biol Cell
23(7): 1316–1329.
Moreno-Vicente, R., D. M. Pavon, I. Martin-Padura, M. Catala-Montoro, A. Diez-
Sanchez, A. Quilez-Alvarez, J. A. Lopez, M. Sanchez-Alvarez, J. Vazquez, R. Strippoli
and M. A. Del Pozo (2018). "Caveolin-1 Modulates Mechanotransduction Responses to
Substrate Stiffness through Actin-Dependent Control of YAP ." Cell Rep
25(6): 1622–
1635 e1626.
Narain, R., J. M. Muncie-Vasic and V. M. Weaver (2025). "Forcing the code: tension
modulates signaling to drive morphogenesis and malignancy." Genes Dev 39(1-2): 163–
181.
Nieto-Felipe, J., A. Macias-Diaz, J. Sanchez-Collado, A. Berna-Erro, I. Jardin, G. M.
Salido, J. J. Lopez and J. A. Rosado (2023). "Role of Orai-family channels in the
activation and regulation of transcriptional activity." J Cell Physiol
238(4): 714–726.
Ong, H. L., K. P. Subedi, G. Y. Son, X. Liu and I. S. Ambudkar (2019). "Tuning store-
operated calcium entry to modulate Ca(2+)-dependent physiological processes."
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1866(7): 1037–1045.
Pallagi, P., M. Görög, N. Papp, T. Madácsy, Á. Varga, T. Crul, V. Szabó, M. Molnár, K.
Dudás, A. Grassalkovich, E. Szederkényi, G. Lázár, V. Venglovecz, P. Hegyi and J.
Maléth (2022). "Bile acid- and ethanol-mediated activation of Orai1 damages pancreatic
ductal secretion in acute pancreatitis." J Physiol
600(7): 1631–1650.
Pardo-Pastor, C., F. Rubio-Moscardo, M. Vogel-Gonzalez, S. A. Serra, A. Afthinos, S.
Mrkonjic, O. Destaing, J. F. Abenza, J. M. Fernandez-Fernandez, X. Trepat, C. Albiges-
Rizo, K. Konstantopoulos and M. A. Valverde (2018). "Piezo2 channel regulates RhoA
and actin cytoskeleton to promote cell mechanobiological responses." Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A 115(8): 1925–1930.
Parsonage, G., K. Cuthbertson, N. Endesh, N. Murciano, A. J. Hyman, C. H. Revill, O.
V. Povstyan, E. Chuntharpursat-Bon, M. Debant, M. J. Ludlow, T. S. Futers, L.
Lichtenstein, J. A. Kinsella, F. Bartoli, M. G. Rotordam, N. Becker, A. Bruggemann, R.
Foster and D. J. Beech (2023). "Improved PIEZO1 agonism through 4-benzoic acid
modification of Yoda1." Br J Pharmacol
180(16): 2039–2063.
Parton, R. G. (2018). "Caveolae: Structure, Function, and Relationship to Disease."
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 34: 111–136.
Posey, A. D., Jr., P. Pytel, K. Gardikiotes, A. R. Demonbreun, M. Rainey, M. George, H.
Band and E. M. McNally (2011). "Endocytic recycling proteins EHD1 and EHD2 interact
with fer-1-like-5 (Fer1L5) and mediate myoblast fusion." J Biol Chem 286(9): 7379–
7388.
Ramsey, I. S., M. Delling and D. E. Clapham (2006). "An introduction to TRP channels."
Annu Rev Physiol 68: 619–647.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Rausch, V., J. R. Bostrom, J. Park, I. R. Bravo, Y . Feng, D. C. Hay, B. A. Link and C. G.
Hansen (2019). "The Hippo Pathway Regulates Caveolae Expression and Mediates
Flow Response via Caveolae." Curr Biol 29(2): 242–255 e246.
Sathish, V., A. J. Abcejo, M. A. Thompson, G. C. Sieck, Y . S. Prakash and C. M.
Pabelick (2012). "Caveolin-1 regulation of store-operated Ca(2+) influx in human airway
smooth muscle." Eur Respir J 40(2): 470–478.
Shvets, E., A. Ludwig and B. J. Nichols (2014). "News from the caves: update on the
structure and function of caveolae." Curr Opin Cell Biol 29: 99–106.
Sinha, B., D. Koster, R. Ruez, P. Gonnord, M. Bastiani, D. Abankwa, R. V. Stan, G.
Butler-Browne, B. Vedie, L. Johannes, N. Morone, R. G. Parton, G. Raposo, P . Sens, C.
Lamaze and P. Nassoy (2011). "Cells respond to mechanical stress by rapid
disassembly of caveolae." Cell
144(3): 402–413.
Sotodosos-Alonso, L., M. Pulgarin-Alfaro and M. A. Del Pozo (2023). "Caveolae
Mechanotransduction at the Interface between Cytoskeleton and Extracellular Matrix."
Cells 12(6).
Stauderman, K. A. (2018). "CRAC channels as targets for drug discovery and
development." Cell Calcium 74: 147–159.
Stefl, M., M. Takamiya, V. Middel, M. Tekpinar, K. Nienhaus, T. Beil, S. Rastegar, U.
Strahle and G. U. Nienhaus (2024). "Caveolae disassemble upon membrane lesioning
and foster cell survival." iScience 27(2): 108849.
Stoeber, M., I. K. Stoeck, C. Hanni, C. K. Bleck, G. Balistreri and A. Helenius (2012).
"Oligomers of the ATPase EHD2 confine caveolae to the plasma membrane through
association with actin." EMBO J 31(10): 2350–2364.
Suchyna, T. M., J. H. Johnson, K. Hamer, J. F. Leykam, D. A. Gage, H. F. Clemo, C. M.
Baumgarten and F. Sachs (2000). "Identification of a peptide toxin from Grammostola
spatulata spider venom that blocks cation-selective stretch-activated channels." J Gen
Physiol 115(5): 583–598.
Szabo, V., N. Csakany-Papp, M. Gorog, T. Madacsy, A. Varga, A. Kiss, B. Tel, B. Jojart,
T. Crul, K. Dudas, M. Bagyanszki, N. Bodi, F. Ayaydin, S. Jee, L. Tiszlavicz, K. A.
Stauderman, S. Hebbar, P . Pallagi and J. Maleth (2023). "Orai1 calcium channel
inhibition prevents progression of chronic pancreatitis." JCI Insight 8(13).
Szabó, V., N. Csákány-Papp, M. Görög, T. Madacsy, Á. Varga, A. Kiss, B. Tel, B. Jójárt,
T. Crul, K. Dudás, M. Bagyánszki, N. Bódi, F. Ayaydin, S. Jee, L. Tiszlavicz, K. A.
Stauderman, S. Hebbar, P . Pallagi and J. Maléth (2023). "Orai1 calcium channel
inhibition prevents progression of chronic pancreatitis." JCI Insight
.
Torrino, S., W. W. Shen, C. M. Blouin, S. K. Mani, C. Viaris de Lesegno, P. Bost, A.
Grassart, D. Koster, C. A. Valades-Cruz, V. Chambon, L. Johannes, P. Pierobon, V.
Soumelis, C. Coirault, S. Vassilopoulos and C. Lamaze (2018). "EHD2 is a
mechanotransducer connecting caveolae dynamics with gene transcription." J Cell Biol
217(12): 4092–4105.
van Vliet, A. R., F. Giordano, S. Gerlo, I. Segura, S. Van Eygen, G. Molenberghs, S.
Rocha, A. Houcine, R. Derua, T. Verfaillie, J. Vangindertael, H. De Keersmaecker, E.
Waelkens, J. Tavernier, J. Hofkens, W. Annaert, P. Carmeliet, A. Samali, H. Mizuno and
P. Agostinis (2017). "The ER Stress Sensor PERK Coordinates ER-Plasma Membrane
Contact Site Formation through Interaction with Filamin-A and F-Actin Remodeling." Mol
Cell 65(5): 885–899.e886.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Varadarajan, S., S. A. Chumki, R. E. Stephenson, E. R. Misterovich, J. L. Wu, C. E.
Dudley, I. S. Erofeev, A. B. Goryachev and A. L. Miller (2022). "Mechanosensitive
calcium flashes promote sustained RhoA activation during tight junction remodeling." J
Cell Biol 221(4).
Waldron, R. T., Y. Chen, H. Pham, A. Go, H. Y. Su, C. Hu, L. Wen, S. Z. Husain, C. A.
Sugar, J. Roos, S. Ramos, A. Lugea, M. Dunn, K. Stauderman and S. J. Pandol (2019).
"The Orai Ca(2+) channel inhibitor CM4620 targets both parenchymal and immune cells
to reduce inflammation in experimental acute pancreatitis." J Physiol
597(12): 3085–
3105.
Wei, Y. and W. Li (2021). "Calcium, an Emerging Intracellular Messenger for the Hippo
Pathway Regulation." Front Cell Dev Biol 9: 694828.
Wu, J., L. Liu, T. Matsuda, Y. Zhao, A. Rebane, M. Drobizhev, Y . F. Chang, S. Araki, Y .
Arai, K. March, T. E. Hughes, K. Sagou, T. Miyata, T. Nagai, W. H. Li and R. E.
Campbell (2013). "Improved orange and red Ca(2)+/- indicators and photophysical
considerations for optogenetic applications." ACS Chem Neurosci
4(6): 963–972.
Yang, S., X. Miao, S. Arnold, B. Li, A. T. Ly, H. Wang, M. Wang, X. Guo, M. M. Pathak,
W. Zhao, C. D. Cox and Z. Shi (2022). "Membrane curvature governs the distribution of
Piezo1 in live cells." Nat Commun 13(1): 7467.
Yang, Y., L. A. Valencia, C. H. Lu, M. L. Nakamoto, C. T. Tsai, C. Liu, H. Yang, W.
Zhang, Z. Jahed, W. R. Lee, F. Santoro, J. Liou, J. C. Wu and B. Cui (2024). "Plasma
membrane curvature regulates the formation of contacts with the endoplasmic
reticulum." Nat Cell Biol
26(11): 1878–1891.
Yeow, I., G. Howard, J. Chadwick, C. Mendoza-Topaz, C. G. Hansen, B. J. Nichols and
E. Shvets (2017). "EHD Proteins Cooperate to Generate Caveolar Clusters and to
Maintain Caveolae during Repeated Mechanical Stress." Curr Biol
27(19): 2951–2962
e2955.
Yeow, I., G. Howard, J. Chadwick, C. Mendoza-Topaz, C. G. Hansen, B. J. Nichols and
E. Shvets (2017). "EHD Proteins Cooperate to Generate Caveolar Clusters and to
Maintain Caveolae during Repeated Mechanical Stress." Curr Biol
27(19): 2951–
2962.e2955.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure Legends
Figure 1. EHD2 is required for plasma membrane repair. A-B. Demonstration of
EHD2 requirement for mechanically-induced Ca2+-dependent plasma membrane repair
in TNBC cell lines. The indicated cell lines were subjected to cell scraping to induce
mechanical injury to plasma membrane in media containing FITC-dextran (to label cell
with damaged plasma membrane) with or without Ca
2+. At the indicated times after
wounding at room temperature, cells were rinsed and incubated with propidium iodide to
label cells that had failed to repair. The number of wounded cells with successful repair
(only FITC-Dextran-labeled) are shown as a percentage of total cells (green cells plus
green and red cells). A. Schematic diagrams of plasma membrane repair assays
induced by mechanical injury or Streptolysin O toxin. B. Quantification of cells with
successful plasma membrane repair over time. Data represents mean +/- SEM of three
experiments, two-way ANOVA, *,p<0.05, **,p<0.01. C-D. Demonstration of EHD2
requirement for the repair of streptolysin O (SLO) induced plasma membrane pores.
The indicated cell lines were treated with SLO for 5 min in Ca
2+ free Tyrode’s buffer on
ice, followed by incubation for 10 min in Ca2+-containing Tyrode’s buffer. Cells were
incubated with propidium iodide-containing medium and analyzed by FACS. C.
Representative FACS analyses of propidium Iodide (PI) staining after streptolysin O
(SLO)-induced membrane damage and repair. Cells to the right of the main peak on left
represent those that failed to repair their plasma membrane. D. Quantification of PI
positive cell population shown in (C). EHD2 KO-mEhd2 represents EHD2-KO MDA-MB-
231 cells rescued by stable expression of mouse Ehd2. Quantified data shown are from
three independent experiments. Welch’s t-test. *,p<0.05, **,p<0.01, ***, p<0.001.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Figure 2. Orai1 is required for plasma membrane repair. A. Western blot
confirmation of loss of Orai1 expression upon CRISPR/Cas9-mediated KO in MDA-MB-
231 and Hs578T cells; shown are pools of three clones maintained individually. B-C.
Impairment of SOCE upon Orai1 KO in TNBC cells. SOCE was measured using
thapsigargin-induced ER Ca
2+ depletion. Typical profiles are shown on left and
quantification of fold-change in peak fluorescence intensity from 3 independent
experiments is shown on right. Welch’s t test, ***p<0.001. D-E. Orai1-KO impairs the
repair of mechanically induced plasma membrane injury. WT vs. Orai1-KO cells were
subjected to mechanical injury to plasma membrane and repair assay was performed as
in Fig. 1A-B. Representative confocal images are shown in D and quantified data are
shown in E. Scale bar, 200 µm. Data represents mean +/- SEM of three experiments,
two-way ANOVA, **,p<0.01. F-G. Orai1-KO impairs the repair of SLO-induced
membrane injury. Plasma membrane damage using SLO and the repair assay on MDA-
MB-231 (F) and Hs578T (G) cell lines were as in Fig. 1C-D. Representative confocal
images are shown on left. Quantification of PI-stained cells from 3 independent
experiments is shown on right. Welch’s t test, ***p<0.001. H-J. Orai1 inhibitors impair
plasma membrane repair. Panel H shows Thapsigargin (TG)-induced SOCE
measurements (initial peak, Ca
2+ store release in the absence of extracellular Ca2+;
second peak, SOCE in the presence of extracellular Ca2+) performed on the indicated
cell lines cultured with or without CM4620 (10 μM, 4 hours pretreatment). Note
significant SOCE inhibition by CM4620 in WT cells but not in Orai1-KO cells, supporting
Orai1-selelctive effect of CM4620. Data represents mean +/- SEM of three experiments,
Welch’s t test, ***p<0.001. The I panel shows the impairment of mechanically induced
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
plasma membrane repair by CM4620 in MDA-MB-231. Cells were cultured without or
with pretreatment with CM4620 (10 μM) and analyzed for repair as in Fig. 1A-B. Scale
bar, 200 µm. Data represents mean +/- SEM of three experiments, two-way ANOVA,
**,p<0.01. The J panel shows the impairment of SLO-induced membrane damage in
MDA-MB-231. Left panel shows representative FACS analysis of membrane repair in
cells without or with CM4620 treatment. Right panel shows quantification of cells that
failed to repair (PI staining) from 3 independent experiments. Data represents mean +/-
SEM of three experiments. Welch’s t test, ***, p<0.001.
Figure 3. Rapid recruitment of EHD2 to plasma membrane at sites of mechanical
force application. A. Schematic diagram of force application to plasma membrane
using indentation using an atomic force microscope (AFM). MDA-MB231 cells plated on
glass-bottom dishes were transiently transfected with EHD2-mCherry (Stoeber, Stoeck
et al. 2012) and imaged with a confocal microscope while AFM micro-cantilevers were
used to apply force at specific locations on the plasma membrane (indentation). Pre-
indentation, green; indentation, red; post-indentation, blue. B. Representative time-
lapse image of EHD2-mCherry transfected MDA-MB-231 cells at the indicated times
before, during and after indentation. The yellow box indicates the area of membrane
indentation. Lower panels show higher-magnification images highlighting the area
around the indentation. Scale bar, 5 µm. C. Measurement of the force applied to the cell
(μN; blue) in relation to cantilever indentation (depth in μM, red). D. Quantification of
EHD2 fluorescence intensity at various time points during plasma membrane
indentation. E. Fold change of EHD2 fluorescence intensity before and after indentation
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
(1 min). Data points represent cells analyzed through three independent experiments
(n= 12). Two-way ANOVA; **p<0.01.
Figure 4. EHD2 and Orai1 are required for mechanosensitive extracellular calcium
import into cytoplasm. MDA-MB231 cells plated on glass-bottom dishes were
transiently transfected with the Ca2+ reporter R-GECO1.2. Cells were imaged with a
confocal microscope while micro-cantilevers were employed to indent specific locations
on the plasma membrane. A. Representative time-lapse images wherein white circles
indicate the location of membrane indentation (Left panel). Quantification of Ca2+
intensity fold change (Right panel). B. Abrogation of mechanical force-induced Ca2+
import by EHD2-, Orai1- or CAV1-KO and rescue of EHD2-KO cell response with stable
mouse EHD2 (mEHD2) expression. Left, representative images at baseline and peak of
AFM indentation. Right, quantification of Ca2+ signals. Shown are fold change in Ca2+
reporter (R-GECO1.2) signals in MDA-MB-231 cell lines without (WT) or with the
indicated genetic perturbations. Fold change of Ca2+ peak fluorescence intensity after
indentation relative to basal fluorescence intensity prior to indentation are computed
from three independent experiments (n=14). One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple
comparisons test, ***p<0.001, **p<0.01; ns, not significant. C. Inhibition of mechanical
force-induced Ca
2+ import by Orai1 inhibitor CM5480. Ca2+ reporter R-GECO1.2-
transfected MDA-MB-231 cells cultured without or with CM5480 (10 μM; 24 h
pretreatment) were subjected to AFM cantilever indentation and fluorescence intensity
recorded over time. Data points represent cells (n= 14) analyzed through three
independent experiments. Welch’s t test, ***p<0.001. D. Mechanical force induced Ca
2+
import recorded by Orai1-linked Ca2+ biosensor and its inhibition by CM5480. Orai1-
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
linked Ca2+ biosensor (G-GECO1-Orai1)-transfected MDA-MB-231 cells cultured
without or with CM5480 (10 μM) were subjected to indentation with AFM cantilever and
fluorescence intensity recorded over time. Left, representative images at baseline and
peak of indentation. Right, quantification of data. Data points represent cells (n= 21)
analyzed through three independent experiments. Welch’s t test, ***p<0.001. E.
Inhibition of mechanical force-induced Ca2+ import upon combined STIM1 and STIM2
siRNA knockdown. MDA-MB-231 cells transfected with the Ca2+ reporter (R-GECO1.2)
and co-transfected with control or STIM1 and STIM2 siRNAs (knockdown verified in Fig.
S3D) were subjected to AFM cantilever indentation and fluorescence intensity recorded
over time. Left, representative images at baseline and peak of indentation. Right,
quantification of data. Data points represent cells (n=18) analyzed through three
independent experiments. Welch’s t test, *p<0.05. Scale bar, 5 µm.Figure 5. EHD2 and
Orai1 are required for mechanosensitive YAP/TAZ pathway activation. A-B. Impact
of EHD2, Orai1, or CAV1 KO on stiff matrix-induced YAP translocation. The indicated
MDA-MB231 wildtype (WT), EHD2-KO, EHD2-KO/mEhd2, Orai1-KO, and CAV1-KO cell
lines were cultured on collagen-coated 24-well Cytosoft Rigidity plates layered with 0.2
KPa (soft) or 64 Kpa (stiff) hydrogels, fixed, stained with AF488 conjugated anti-YAP
antibody and imaged by confocal imaging. Representative images are shown in A
(magnified images of a single cell shown under each panel to highlight
nuclea/cytoplasmic localization of YAP) . Quantification of data is shown in B. Image J
was used to put masks around the nucleus to quantify fluorescence signals (pixels)
within (nuclear) and outside (cytoplasmic) the mask and the data are shown as the ratio
of nuclear/cytoplasmic YAP staining signals. Each data point represents cells analyzed
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
in 63 X fields from three independent experiments (at least 39 cells analyzed in each
group). One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, **p<0.01,
***p<0.001. C. Impact of Orai1 inhibitors on stiff matrix-induced nuclear localization of
YAP . MDAM-MB-231 cells plated on stiff matrix, as in A, were treated for last 4 hours
with vehicle (DMSO) or Orai1 inhibitors (CM4620 or CM5480; 10 μM) and cells
processed for YAP staining. Nuclear/cytoplasmic ratios of YAP staining were determined
as in A/B. Representative images are shown on left. Quantified data of nuclear to
cytoplasmic YAP staining ratio are shown on right. Each data point represents cells
analyzed from three experiments (n=24). Welch’s t test, ***p<0.001. D-E. Impact of
EHD2 or Orai1-KO on YAP/TAZ-TEAD pathway gene targets. D shows the luciferase
activity of transiently transfected YAP/TAZ reporter (pRP-hRluc-8X GTIIC-Luc) in the
indicated MDA-MB-231 cell lines cultured on stiff matrix as in A. Data represents mean
+/- SEM of three experiments, each with 6 replicates. Welch’s t test, ** p<0.01. E shows
RT-qPCR analyses of YAP/TAZ downstream genes, CTGF, CYR61, ANKRD1, CAV1
and CAVIN1 in the indicated MDA-MB-231 cell lines cultures on 0.2 or 64 Kpa
hydrogels. The gene expression values were normalized to GAPDH. Data represents
mean +/- SEM of three experiments. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple
comparisons test, ***p<0.001.
Figure 6. YAP/TAZ-TEAD pathway activity is required for mechanosensitive Ca
2+
import and membrane repair. A. TEAD inhibition reduces CAV1 expression. MDA-MB-
231 or Hs578T cells cultured without or with the pan-TEAD inhibitor GNE-7883 (10 μM)
for 48 hours were analyzed by WB for CAV1 expression; Hsc70, loading control. Fold-
change in signals quantified by densitometry and analyzed using Image J are shown on
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
right. Welch’s t test, *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01. B-C. TEAD inhibition reduces the
Thapsigargin (TG)-induced SOCE. Cells were pretreated with GNE-7883 (10 μM) for 24
hours. Left, representative plots; right, quantified data from three experiments. Welch’s t
test; **p<0.001. D. TEAD inhibition impairs the mechanical force-induced Ca2+ import.
AFM cantilevers were used to apply force and measure Ca2+ import from the
extracellular space using fluorescence intensity of transfected Ca2+ reporter (R-
RECO1.2) as the readout. Cells were pretreated with GNE-7883 (10 μM) for 24 hours
where indicated. Data points represent cells analyzed through three independent
experiments (n=33). Welch’s t test, ***, p<0.001. E-F. TEAD inhibition impairs the repair
of induced plasma membrane injuries. Shown is the impact of GNE-7883 on the repair
of mechanically induced (E) and SLO-induced (F) plasma membrane damage,
assessed as in Fig. 1A-B and Fig. 1C-D, respectively. GNE-7883 pre-treatment (10 μM),
where indicated, was for 72 hours. Representative confocal images (E; top panel) or
FACS plots (F; right panel) are shown. Quantified data shown are from 3 independent
experiments and presented as mean +/- SEM of 3 experiments. Two-way ANOVA or
Welch’s t test applied to data in E and F, respectively, *p<0.05. Scale bar, 20 µm.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
STAR METHODS
Key resources table
REAGENT OR RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Antibodies
Orai1 Millipore-Sigma Cat# O8264; (Luan,
Bielecki et al. 2023)
Beta-actin Millipore-Sigma Cat# SAB11305567
Hsc70 Santa Cruz Cat# sc-7298
Caveolin1 BD Biosciences Cat# 610057
EHD2 (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023) N/A
YAP (IF) Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 14729
HRP-conjugated Protein A antibody ThemoFisher Scientific Cat# 101023
HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody ThemoFisher Scientific Cat# 31431
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins
Thapsigargin ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# T7459
Fluo 4 AM ThemoFisher Scientific Cat# 14201
CM4620 SelleckChem Cat# S6834
CM5480 CalciMedica N/A
GsMTx4 SelleckChem Cat# P1205
Yoda2 TOCRIS Cat# 8051
TRIzol ThemoFisher Scientific Cat# 15596026
Critical commercial assays
Dual-Luciferase® Reporter assay Kit Promega Cat# E1910
RT-qPCR kit Qiagen Cat# 204141
Experimental models: Cell lines
MDA-MB-231 ATCC Cat# HTB-26
Hs578T ATCC Cat# HTB-126
MDA-MB-231 EHD2 KO (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023) N/A
Hs578T EHD2 KO (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023) N/A
MDA-MB-231 CAV1 KO (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023) N/A
MDA-MB-231 EHD2 KO mEhd2 (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023) N/A
Recombinant DNA
CMV-R-GECO1.2 (Wu, Liu et al. 2013) Addgene# 45494
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
G-GECO1-Orai1 Joseph L Dynes et al. 2015
(Dynes, Amcheslavsky et al.
2016)
Addgene# 73561
EHD2-mChery GeneCopoeia Cat# EX-A3485-Lv155
pLenti-U6-sgRNA-SFFV-Cas9-2A-Puro
(Orai1 KO generation)
Abm Cat# 35720125
Software and algorithms
ImageJ https://imagej.net/software/imag
ej/index
N/A
FlowJo 10 FlowJo N/A
Zen Zeiss N/A
Prism 9 GraphPad N/A
Oligonucleotides
See Table S1 for RT-qPCR primers N/A N/A
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND SUBJECT DETAILS
Cell lines and medium
MDA-MB-231 cell line (obtained from ATCC) was cultured in complete α -MEM medium
with 5% fetal bovine serum, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM each of sodium pyruvate,
nonessential amino acids, and L-glutamine, 50 μ M 2-ME, and 1% penicillin/
streptomycin (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Hs578T cell line (ATCC) was cultured
in
α -MEM medium supplemented as above plus 1 μ g/mL hydrocortisone and 12.5
ng/mL epidermal growth factor (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Generation and
maintenance of EHD2-KO TNBC cell lines, EHD2-KO cell lines reconstituted with
mouse EHD2 (EHD2-KO-mEHD2) and CAV1-KO cell lines have been described
previously (Luan, Bielecki et al. 2023).
Antibodies and reagents
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Antibodies used for immunoblotting were as follows: Orai1 (# O8264) and beta-actin (#
SAB1305567) from Millipore-Sigma; HSC70 (# sc-7298) from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology; Caveolain-1 (#610057) from BD Biosciences; Cavin 1(#46379) from Cell
Signaling Technology. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated Protein A or HRP-
conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody for immunoblotting were from
Invitrogen. YAP antibody (Alexa Fluor® 488 Conjugate, #14729) for
immunofluorescence (IF) staining was from Cell Signaling Technology. Thapsigargin (#
T7459) and Fluo 4AM (#14201) were from ThermoFisher Scientific. Orai1 inhibitor
CM4620 (Waldron, Chen et al. 2019) was from SelleckChem (#S6834); Orai1 inhibitor
CM5480 (Szabo, Csakany-Papp et al. 2023) was provided by CalciMedica Inc. (La
Jolla, CA).
Transfection reagents and plasmids
XtremeGENE 9 transfection reagent was from Roche Applied Science (Indianapolis,
IN); CMV-R-GECO1.2 (Wu, Liu et al. 2013) was a gift from Robert Campbell (Addgene
plasmid # 45494 ; http://n2t.net/addgene:45494 ; RRID:Addgene_45494).
G-GECO1-
Orai1 (Dynes, Amcheslavsky et al. 2016) was a gift from Michael Cahalan (Addgene
plasmid # 73561; http://n2t.net/addgene:73561; RRID:Addgene_73561). EHD2-mChery
plasmid (# EX-A3485-Lv155) was from GeneCopoeia.
Generation of CRISPR-Cas9 knockout cell lines
All-in-One sgRNA CRISPR/Cas9 Lentivectors from Applied Biological Materials
(Richmond, BC, Canada) were used to derive Orai1 (pLenti-U6-sgRNA-SFFV-Cas9-2A-
Puro, #35720125) KO cell lines.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
SOCE assay
Cells were seeded in 35 mm glass-bottom dishes (cat. #FD35-100, WPI Inc) and loaded
with Fluo4-AM in modified Tyrode’s solution (2 mM calcium chloride, 1 mM magnesium
chloride, 137 mM sodium chloride, 2.7 mM potassium chloride, 12 mM sodium
bicarbonate, 0.2 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate, 5.5 mM glucose, pH 7.4) for 1 hour
at 37
oC. After washing with Ca2+-free Tyrode’s solution, live cells were imaged under a
confocal microscope (LSM710; Carl Zeiss), with fluorescence excitation at 488 nm and
emission at 490–540 nm. To initiate Ca2+ release from intracellular stores, 2.5 μ M
thapsigargin was added in the absence of extracellular Ca2+. Once the Ca2+ signals
approached the baseline, calcium chloride was added to 2 mM final concentration to
record the SOCE. Data is presented as fold change in fluorescence emission relative to
baseline.
Membrane repair assay
For mechanical injury, confluent cell monolayers in 48-well plates were incubated in
Tyrode’s solution containing membrane-impermeable FITC-Dextran (500 µg/mL). A
standardized mechanical injury was introduced via a single scratch wound using a 200
µL pipette tip, allowing dye entry into cells with compromised plasma membranes. At
designated time points post-injury, the extracellular dye was removed followed by a PBS
wash. Cells were then briefly incubated with propidium iodide (PI; 50 µg/mL) to label the
nuclei of cells with unrepaired plasma membrane defects. Imaging was performed via
fluorescence microscopy. FITC+ cells represented the total population of injured cells.
FITC+PI+ (double-positive) cells were scored as those with failure to repair their
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
membrane defects. The repair efficiency was calculated as the percentage of injured
(FITC+) cells that excluded PI (FITC+PI-) at each time point. For Streptolysin O (SLO)
induced membrane injury, 106 trypsin/EDTA-released and washed cells were incubated
with SLO (25 U/mL) in suspension for 5 min at 4°C in 250 μ l of Ca2+-free Tyrode’s
solution followed by resuspension in 37°C Tyrode’s solution for 10 min and PI staining.
After flow cytometry (FACSCalibur; Becton Dickinson) of at least 10,000 cells, the data
were analyzed using the FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc.).
Plasma membrane indentation using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)
Cells were cultured on 35 mm glass bottom dishes and transfected with R-GECO1.2
(Wu, Liu et al. 2013) or EHD2-mCherry (Stoeber, Stoeck et al. 2012) plasmid. Live cell
imaging was conducted with cells were in CO
₂ -independent medium supplemented with
10% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin and maintained at 37 °C with a JPK Petri Dish
Heater to preserve the physiological conditions. Indentation was carried out on a Bruker
CellHesion 200 AFM using a pyramidal-tipped microcantilever (FM-10, NanoAndMore).
A loading rate of 3 µm/s and a maximum contact force of 100 nN were applied, with
each indentation held for 20 s. Simultaneous high-resolution imaging was performed
using a Zeiss LSM 900 confocal microscope. AFM force–distance data were processed
in JPK Data Processing (JPK-DP), while confocal images were analyzed using
FIJI/ImageJ. Statistical analyses and plotting were conducted in OriginLab Pro.
Immunofluorescence microscopy
Cells were cultured on collagen (#5005, Advanced Biomatrix) pre-coated glass bottom
CytoSoft® Imaging 24-Well Plate of different stiffness (#5183 for 0.2 kPa, #5189 for 64k
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Pa, Advanced Biomatrix) to about 50% confluency, fixed with 4% PFA/PBS (10 min),
blocked with 5% BSA/PBS (60 min), and incubated with Fluorescent conjugated
antibodies in 5% BSA/PBS overnight at 4 °C. Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst
33342 (#62249, ThermoFisher Scientific) staining. Fluorescence images were captured
on a Zeiss LSM-800 confocal microscope (63X objective) and analyzed using the ZEN
software (Zeiss).
Western blotting
Cells were lysed in Triton-X-100 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5%
Triton-X-100, 1 mM PMSF, 10 mM NaF, and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate). Lysates
were rocked at 4 °C for at least 1 hr, spun in a microfuge at 13,000 rpm for 20 min at 4
°C and supernatant protein concentration determined using the BCA assay kit (Thermo
Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL). 50
/i3μ g aliquots of lysate proteins were resolved on
sodium dodecyl sulfate-7.5% or 12% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE),
transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane, and immunoblotted with the
indicated antibodies.
Trans-well migration assay
Cells grown in 0.5% FBS-containing starvation medium for 24 h were trypsinized and
seeded at 10
4 on top chambers of 24-well plate trans-wells (# 353097, Corning) in 200
μ L of growth factor deprived medium. After 3 h, medium containing 10% FBS was
added to lower chambers and trans-wells incubated at 37oC for 16 h. The non-migrated
cells on the upper surface of membranes were removed with cotton swabs, and the
migrated cells on the lower surface methanol-fixed and stained in 0.5% crystal violet in
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
methanol. Six random 10× fields per insert were photographed, and cells counted using
the ImageJ software. Each experiment was run in triplicates and repeated three times.
YAP/TAZ-TEAD pathway luciferase reporter assay
Cells were transfected with a synthetic TEAD dual luciferase reporter (pRP-hRluc-8X
GTIIC-Luc, cat# VB250204-1311 from VectorBuilder). All luciferase emission
measurements were performed using a Dual-Luciferase® Reporter assay Kit (DLR™
assay, Promega). Luminescence was recorded using a GloMax® luminometer
(Promega).
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (#15596026, Invitrogen), reverse
transcribed using a real-time Quantitative PCR kit (#204141, Qiagen) and used for real-
time QPCR with primers listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Primer sequences for RT-qPCR
Forward Reverse
CYR61 ATGGTCCCAGTGCTCAAAGA GGGCCGGTATTTCTTCACAC
CTGF CAGCATGGACGTTCGTCTG AACCACGGTTTGGTCCTTGG
ANKRD1 ACGCCAAAGACAGAGAAGGA TTCTGCCAGTGTAGCACCAG
CAV1 TTCTGGGCTTCATCTGGCAAC GCTCAGCCCTATTGGTCCACTTTA
CAVIN1 ATCAAGAAGCTGGAGGTCAACGAG TCTCAGGTTTTCCTTGGTCTTGA
GAPDH AACTGCTTAGCACCCCTGGC ATGACCTTGCCCACAGCCTT
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism software (version 9) was used to perform statistical analyses.
Statistical analysis of cell biological data was performed by comparing groups using
unpaired Welch’s t-test (two groups), one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
comparisons test (more than two groups) and two-way ANOVA test (two factors). p
values of <0.05 were considered significant.
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
A
*
**
*
**
Fig 1
B MDA-MB-231
Hs578T
WT
EHD2 KO
EHD2 KO mEhd2
MDA-MB-231 Hs578T
C
Normalized to Mode
Normalized to Mode
WT
EHD2 KO
D
***
ns
***
0
10
20
30
40
50
WT EHD2 KO EHD2 KO
mEhd2
PI+ cells (%)
MDA-MB-231
0
20
40
60
80
WT EHD2 KO
PI+ cells (%)
Hs578T
Assay of mechanically-induced PM breaches
Assay of pore-forming toxin induced PM breaches
SLO
+ PI
PIScratch woundDextran
Propidium Iodide-APropidium Iodide-A
Plasma membrane repair (%)Plasma membrane repair (%)
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Fig S1
WT EHD2 KO WT EHD2 KO
Without Calcium
DextranMerge
With Calcium
Propidium Iodide
MDA-MB-231A
B
DextranMerge Propidium Iodide
WT EHD2 KO WT EHD2 KO
Without Calcium With Calcium
Hs578T
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Fig 2
0
1
2
3
4
0 2 4 6 8 10
Ft/F0
Time (min)
MDA-MB-231
WT
Orai1 KO
Tg 2.5 μM
Ca2+ 2 mM
A B
MDA-MB-231
Orai1
β-actin
WT KO
Hs578T
WT KO
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 2 4 6 8 10
Ft/F0
Time (min)
Hs578T
WT
Orai1 KO
***
***
***
**
MDA-MB-231Hs578T
WT Orai1 KO
** **
C D
Tg 2.5 μM
Ca2+ 2 mM
Dextran PI
MDA-MB-231
Hs578T
E
WT
Orai1 KO
Propidium Iodide-A
Propidium Iodide-A
Normalized to Mode Normalized to Mode 0
10
20
30
40
50
WT Orai1 KO
PI+ cells (%)
MDA-MB-231
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
WT Orai1 KO
PI+ cells (%)
Hs578T
***
***
F
MDA-MB-231
Hs578T
H
0
1
2
3
4
0 5 10
Ft/F0
Time (min)
MDA-MB-231
WT
Orai1 KO
WT + CM4620
Orai1 KO +
CM4620
Tg 2.5μM
Ca2+ 2mM
*
ns
***
ns
***
***
MDA-MB-231
**
CM4620 Control
Dextran PI MDA-MB-231
I
0
10
20
30
40
50
Control CM4620
PI positive (%)
MDA-MB-231
***Control
CM4620
MDA-MB-231
WT
Orai1 KO
G
J
Normalized to Mode
Propidium Iodide-A
MDA-MB-231
Hs578T
Plasma membrane repair (%)Plasma membrane repair (%)
Plasma membrane repair (%)
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Fig S2
Orai1 KO WT
Dextran Merge
Orai1 KO WT
B
MDA-MB-231Hs578T
A
0
500
1000
1500
WT Orai1 KO
Migrated cells
Hs578T
0
500
1000
1500
WT Orai1 KO
Migrated cells
MDA-MB-231
*** ***
C
0
200
400
600
800
DMSO CM4620
Migrated cells
MDA-MB-231
WT
Orai1 KO
******
ns
CM4620 Control
Dextran Merge
D
Propidium Iodide
Propidium Iodide
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Fig 3
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Fig 4
A
B
C
MDA-MB-231 R-GECO-1
MD-MB-231 R-GECO-1
***
**
**
***
ns
MD-MB-231
D
*
MDA-MB-231 R-GECO-1
E
***
MDA-MB-231 G-GECO1-Orai1
MD-MB-231
Baseline Peak
WTEHD2 KOORAI1 KOCAV1 KOmEhd2ControlCM5480
Baseline Peak
MD-MB-231
NTCSTIM1/2 KD
MD-MB-231
Base line Peak
ControlCM5480
MD-MB-231
Base line Peak
Ca2+ intensity (R-GECO-1)
Ca2+ intensity (G-GECO1-Orai1)
Ca2+ intensity (R-GECO-1)
Ca2+ intensity (R-GECO-1)
Bright field R-GECO-1
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Fig S3
NTC STIM1/2 KD
STIM1
STIM2
β-actin
STIM1
β-actin
-70
-100
STIM2
MDA-MB-231
STIM1 siRNA - 50 100 200 - - - - pmol
STIM2 siRNA - - - - - 50 100 200 pmol
-100
-130
-70
-100
-130
C
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 100 200 300
Ft/F0
Time (s)
MDA-MB-231 G-GECO1-Orai1
Control
CM5480
Tg 2.5 μM
Ca2+ 2 mM
B
A
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 2 4 6 8 10
Ft/F0
Time (min)
MDA-MB-231
WT
Orai1 KO
WT + CM5480
Orai1 KO + CM5480
Tg 2.5 μM
Ca2+ 2 mM
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
DMSO CM5480
Migrated cells
MDA-MB-231
WT
Orai1 KO
***
ns
D
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
EHD2 KO
mEhd2
MDA-MB-231 YAP/DAPI
WT EHD2 KO Orai1 KO Cav1 KO
0.2 kPa
64 kPa
Fig 5
A
C
B
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
0.2kPa
64kPa
**
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
WT EHD2 KO Orai1 KO
Reoaltive lucifearse activity
MDA-MB-231
**
**
D
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
WT EHD2 KO Orai1 KO
Relative expression
CTGF
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
WT EHD2 KO Orai1 KO
Relative expression
CYR61
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
WT EHD2 KO Orai1 KO
Relative expression
ANKRD1
0
1
2
3
4
WT EHD2 KO Orai1 KO
Relative expression
CAV1
0
1
2
3
WT EHD2 KO Orai1 KO
Relative expression
CAVIN1
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
***
0.2kPa
64kPa
0.2kPa
64kPa
0.2kPa
64kPa
0.2kPa
64kPa
0.2kPa
64kPa
E
CM4620CM5480 DMSO
MDA-MB-231 YAP DAPI
***
***
MDA-MB-231
Nuclear/Cytoplasmic YAP intensity
Nuclear/Cytoplasmic YAP intensity
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Fig S4
EHD2 KO
mEhd2 WTEHD2 KOOrai1 KOCav1 KO
YAP DAPI MERGE
64 kPa
YAP DAPI MERGE
0.2 kPa
CM4620CM5480 DMSO
MDA-MB-231
A
B
YAP DAPI MERGE
MDA-MB-231
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Fig 6
A
B
C
GNE-7883
Cav1
Hsc70
MDA-MB-231 Hs578T
- + - +
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 100 200 300 400 500
Ft/F0
Time (s)
MDA-MB-231
Control
GNE-7883
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 100 200 300 400 500
Ft/F0
Time (s)
Hs578T
Control
GNE-7883
Tg 2.5 μM
Ca2+ 2 mM
Tg 2.5 μM
Ca2+ 2 mM
**
**
F
0
5
10
15
20
Control GNE-7883
PI+ cells (%)
MDA-MB-231
0
20
40
60
80
Control GNE-7883
PI+ cells (%)
Hs578T
MDA-MB-231
Control
GNE-7883
Control
GNE-7883
Hs578T
*
*
E
GNE-7883Control
MDA-MB-231Hs578T
Dextran PI
**
MDA-MB-231
***
D
MDA-MB-231
Hs578T
Propidium Iodide-A
Normalized to Mode
Propidium Iodide-A
Normalized to Mode
ns
ns
Cav1
** *
MDA-MB-231
Hs578T
Base line Peak
ControlGNE7883
MD-MB-231
Ca2+ intensity (R-GECO-1)
Plasma membrane repair (%)Plasma membrane repair (%)
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint
Fig S5
GNE-7883 Control
Dextran Merge
GNE-7883 Control
MDA-MB-231Hs578T
Propidium Iodide
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 15, 2026. ; https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.13.724989doi: bioRxiv preprint