From detection to action—a proposed workflow to ensure first reports of alien species from molecular analyses are acted upon

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

This paper proposes a workflow to ensure that first records of alien species detected through molecular analyses are acted upon, moving from detection to confirmatory steps and subsequent reporting/actions. The authors outline, at a high level, how to handle such findings across stages, emphasizing that molecular signals should be translated into actionable outputs rather than remaining unverified or unreported. A key caveat is that the work is a proposed workflow rather than an empirical study, so its effectiveness is not directly tested within a specific dataset. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,684 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Preprint ARPHA Preprints https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e162421 (18 Jun 2025) https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e162421 (18 Jun 2025) Published in: NeoBiota https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.104.162310 Other versions: - Preprint InfoPreprint Info - CiteCite - MetricsMetrics - CommentComment - RelatedRelated - CitedCited ARPHA Preprints doi: 10.3897/arphapreprints.e162421 First posted 18 Jun 2025 Authors Laura Fernandez Winzer - Corresponding author SANBI, Stellenbosch, South Africa Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch, South Africa Macquarie University, School of Natural Sciences, Sydney, Australia South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, South Africa University of Pretoria, Department of Zoology and Entomology, Pretoria, South Africa University of Pretoria, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), Genetics and Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry, Pretoria, South Africa Stellenbosch University, Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch, South Africa South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa Conflict of interest The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Disclaimer: This article is (co-)authored by any of the Editors-in-Chief, Managing Editors or their deputies in this journal. This is an open access preprint distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0