Conducting a Job Study Using 18f-fdg and 99mtc in Pet and Spect CT Imaging

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the range of radiation doses received by operators during their routine activities in a nuclear medicine center. Dose assessments were performed using two types of personal dosimeters: the Bertin miniTRACE γ and the POLIMASTER PM1703MO-1 RED FLASH . Measurements collected from these devices during daily procedures enabled a quantitative analysis of occupational exposure under real working conditions. A comparative evaluation of the recorded values was conducted to assess the consistency, reliability, and precision of the two dosimetry systems. This comparison also provided insight into radiation protection practices within the department and helped verify whether operator exposure levels remained within recommended safety limits. The results demonstrated good agreement between the devices, confirming their reliability and suitability for monitoring occupational exposure in nuclear medicine settings. The highest dose levels were observed during radiopharmaceutical preparation and injection procedures, particularly during dose administration to patients, which represents the most irradiating step for the operator. These findings highlight the importance of strict adherence to radioprotection principles, including time optimization, distance maximization, and appropriate shielding. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the necessity of maintaining dedicated protective equipment to ensure both operator safety and optimal patient management. Overall, the dosimeters proved to be effective tools for routine radiation monitoring and quality assurance in nuclear medicine practice.
Full text 10,723 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Conducting a Job Study Using 18f-fdg and 99mtc in Pet and Spect CT Imaging | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Conducting a Job Study Using 18f-fdg and 99mtc in Pet and Spect CT Imaging TAIB Nour This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9071970/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the range of radiation doses received by operators during their routine activities in a nuclear medicine center. Dose assessments were performed using two types of personal dosimeters: the Bertin miniTRACE γ and the POLIMASTER PM1703MO-1 RED FLASH . Measurements collected from these devices during daily procedures enabled a quantitative analysis of occupational exposure under real working conditions. A comparative evaluation of the recorded values was conducted to assess the consistency, reliability, and precision of the two dosimetry systems. This comparison also provided insight into radiation protection practices within the department and helped verify whether operator exposure levels remained within recommended safety limits. The results demonstrated good agreement between the devices, confirming their reliability and suitability for monitoring occupational exposure in nuclear medicine settings. The highest dose levels were observed during radiopharmaceutical preparation and injection procedures, particularly during dose administration to patients, which represents the most irradiating step for the operator. These findings highlight the importance of strict adherence to radioprotection principles, including time optimization, distance maximization, and appropriate shielding. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the necessity of maintaining dedicated protective equipment to ensure both operator safety and optimal patient management. Overall, the dosimeters proved to be effective tools for routine radiation monitoring and quality assurance in nuclear medicine practice. Medical Physics Effective dose Radioprotection ¹⁸F-FDG 99mTc PET/CT SPECT CT Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9071970","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":603059155,"identity":"1973cf7b-e06c-4c89-a2d7-11e690409bd0","order_by":0,"name":"TAIB Nour","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9704-893X","institution":"Mohamed V University- Faculty of sciences Rabat Morocco","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"TAIB","middleName":"","lastName":"Nour","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-03-09 11:05:29","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9071970/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9071970/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":105567312,"identity":"55acf2f8-6ee4-47c0-b093-5c9b4a1cb5ae","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-27 12:58:51","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":610369,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9071970/v1_covered_6139643c-001d-40ad-a69f-bfda25f6f370.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eConducting a Job Study Using 18f-fdg and 99mtc in Pet and Spect CT Imaging\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Mohammed V University","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Effective dose, Radioprotection, ¹⁸F-FDG, 99mTc, PET/CT, SPECT CT","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9071970/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9071970/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe objective of this study was to evaluate the range of radiation doses received by operators during their routine activities in a nuclear medicine center. Dose assessments were performed using two types of personal dosimeters: the \u003cb\u003eBertin miniTRACE γ\u003c/b\u003e and the \u003cb\u003ePOLIMASTER PM1703MO-1 RED FLASH\u003c/b\u003e. Measurements collected from these devices during daily procedures enabled a quantitative analysis of occupational exposure under real working conditions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA comparative evaluation of the recorded values was conducted to assess the consistency, reliability, and precision of the two dosimetry systems. This comparison also provided insight into radiation protection practices within the department and helped verify whether operator exposure levels remained within recommended safety limits. The results demonstrated good agreement between the devices, confirming their reliability and suitability for monitoring occupational exposure in nuclear medicine settings.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe highest dose levels were observed during radiopharmaceutical preparation and injection procedures, particularly during dose administration to patients, which represents the most irradiating step for the operator. These findings highlight the importance of strict adherence to radioprotection principles, including time optimization, distance maximization, and appropriate shielding. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the necessity of maintaining dedicated protective equipment to ensure both operator safety and optimal patient management. Overall, the dosimeters proved to be effective tools for routine radiation monitoring and quality assurance in nuclear medicine practice.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Conducting a Job Study Using 18f-fdg and 99mtc in Pet and Spect CT Imaging","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-03-27 08:13:57","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9071970/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"59079ddf-bfc1-4c48-8868-642fec224aaf","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 27th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":65239726,"name":"Medical Physics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-03-27T08:13:57+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-03-27 08:13:57","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9071970","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9071970","identity":"rs-9071970","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0