Hysterectomy and sexual wellbeing: more questions are yet to be answered

Other OA: green CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This letter critiques a study on sexual outcomes after hysterectomy for its failure to include a validated interview, while acknowledging the importance of considering subjective distress.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-20 · read from full text ⓘ

This editorial critiques a prospective observational study by Roovers et al regarding sexual wellbeing following different types of hysterectomy. The author expresses concern over the lack of validated measures for sexual function and disputes the conclusion that sexual pleasure is enhanced, noting that new sexual problems developed in approximately one-fifth of patients. Furthermore, the commentary highlights that more than half of women with pre-existing issues remained troubled after surgery and points out the absence of comparative data from the general population. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for hysterectomy, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids or other benign conditions requiring removal of the uterus.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

EDITOR—Roovers et al take subjective distress into account in their examination of sexual outcomes after hysterectomy.1 This is a much needed aspect of the research on this topic. I am disappointed that, as so often in this type of research, the method does not include the use of a well validated interview or …
Full text 2,109 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Editor—Roovers et al take subjective distress into account in their examination of sexual outcomes after hysterectomy.1 This is a much needed aspect of the research on this topic. I am disappointed that, as so often in this type of research, the method does not include the use of a well validated interview or self report measure to assess sexual function. I am concerned about the interpretation of the results for the women who developed new sexual symptoms after their operation. New sexual problems developed in 9 (23%) patients after vaginal hysterectomy, 8 (24%) patients after subtotal abdominal hysterectomy, and 12 (19%) patients after total abdominal hysterectomy. For previously asymptomatic women undergoing hysterectomy the rate of new sexual problems (about one out of five) is troubling and does not imply that sexual symptoms after hysterectomy are rare. Moreover, more women than not (according to the paper, more than 50%) continued to be troubled by existing sexual problems after hysterectomy. I hesitate to accept the authors' conclusion that sexual pleasure is enhanced after hysterectomy, particularly since they did not directly measure sexual enjoyment or satisfaction. Sexual pleasure cannot simply be inferred from the absence or presence of a few symptoms. Several elements are curiously absent from prospective studies of hysterectomy and sexual function, including a consideration of the incidence of sexual problems in the general population compared with that among women undergoing hysterectomy. Strong evidence either for or against the hypothesis that hysterectomy may affect sexual function negatively is lacking. Neither the study by Roovers et al nor other research to date has successfully addressed this question. Competing interests: None declared. References - 1.Roovers JPWR, van der Bom JG, van der Vaart CH, Heintz APM. Hysterectomy and sexual wellbeing: prospective observational study of vaginal hysterectomy, subtotal abdominal hysterectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy. BMJ 2003;327: 774-8. (4 October.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

MeSH descriptors

Hysterectomy Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological Female Humans Hysterectomy Hysterectomy Prospective Studies Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

References (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:02:12.072533+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-12T06:43:03.944938+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK