Hysterectomy and sexual wellbeing
letter
OA: green
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
This letter critiques a study on sexual outcomes after hysterectomy for its failure to include a validated interview, while acknowledging the importance of considering subjective distress.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
EDITOR—Roovers et al take subjective distress into account in their examination of sexual outcomes after hysterectomy.1 This is a much needed aspect of the research on this topic. I am disappointed that, as so often in this type of research, the method does not include the use of a well validated interview or …
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
References (1)
- W2036601863 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK