Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived astrocyte and neuron co-culture model for neuroinflammation modeling

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Access to human neural cells is important for faithful in-vitro neural modeling as animals have innate species gaps. However, primary human cells are difficult to retrieve whereas immortalized human cell lines do not guarantee complete authenticity. Differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) has emerged as a novel approach to derive faithful human neural cells. Here we differentiated hiPSCs into functional midbrain dopaminergic (mDA) neurons and astrocytes by either a dual-SMAD method or a direct lineage reprogramming method. We found that a co-culture setting was necessary in maturing both the hiPSC-derived neurons and astrocytes. Besides, we showed that the neuron-astrocyte co-culture model was suitable for modeling the astrocyte-driven neuroinflammation. Overall, these hiPSC-derived neural cells represent powerful tools for both basic and translational studies.
Full text 985 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Access to human neural cells is important for faithful in-vitro neural modeling as animals have innate species gaps. However, primary human cells are difficult to retrieve whereas immortalized human cell lines do not guarantee complete authenticity. Differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) has emerged as a novel approach to derive faithful human neural cells. Here we differentiated hiPSCs into functional midbrain dopaminergic (mDA) neurons and astrocytes by either a dual-SMAD method or a direct lineage reprogramming method. We found that a co-culture setting was necessary in maturing both the hiPSC-derived neurons and astrocytes. Besides, we showed that the neuron-astrocyte co-culture model was suitable for modeling the astrocyte-driven neuroinflammation. Overall, these hiPSC-derived neural cells represent powerful tools for both basic and translational studies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-ND-4.0