Stochastic Regression and Peak Delineation with Flow Cytometry Data

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Many modern molecular analysis methods utilize DNA content values as part of the measurement process, and thus, the distribution of genome copies per cell within a population of cells is important. Genome copy distributions can be measured via flow cytometry by thresholding (or “gating”) a subset of cells from which estimates of the targeted properties (e.g., genome copy number) can be calculated. This manuscript introduces a new approach that gives separate estimates of signal and noise, the former of which is used for gating and analysis, and the latter is used to quantify uncertainty. In this approach stochastic regression was used to quantify subpopulations of cells that have distinctly different genome copies per cell within a heterogenous population of Escherichia coli ( E. coli) cells. By separating the signal and noise components, they can be used independently to evaluate measurement quality across different experimental conditions.
Full text 1,182 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Many modern molecular analysis methods utilize DNA content values as part of the measurement process, and thus, the distribution of genome copies per cell within a population of cells is important. Genome copy distributions can be measured via flow cytometry by thresholding (or “gating”) a subset of cells from which estimates of the targeted properties (e.g., genome copy number) can be calculated. This manuscript introduces a new approach that gives separate estimates of signal and noise, the former of which is used for gating and analysis, and the latter is used to quantify uncertainty. In this approach stochastic regression was used to quantify subpopulations of cells that have distinctly different genome copies per cell within a heterogenous population of Escherichia coli (E. coli) cells. By separating the signal and noise components, they can be used independently to evaluate measurement quality across different experimental conditions. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Data availability statement: Sample data supporting the findings of this study are available at https://doi.org/10.18434/mds2-3119

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0