Abstract
Background Although linkages between agricultural work and malaria have been widely studied, country-specific information on disease burden, intervention use, and the pathways through which adult agricultural work affects the health of children in the same household remains limited. This study examines the relationship between agricultural work, malaria infection, and related factors among children under five, highlighting subnational variation across urban and rural areas within each country.
Methods
Demographic and Health Survey data from 15 sub-Saharan African countries were analyzed to generate descriptive statistics on malaria prevalence, bed net use, and household, age-related, and environmental characteristics of sampled children. Potential mediators were identified by examining their associations with both self-reported agricultural occupation of an adult household member and malaria positivity. Mediation analysis was conducted using logistic regression models within a Structural Equation Modeling framework to estimate indirect, direct, and total effects. The percentage mediated was calculated using percentile bootstrapping.
Results
Children in agricultural households face a higher risk of malaria than those in non-agricultural households, despite similar rates of bed net use. Substantial country-level variation in malaria prevalence and net use underscores the complex interplay between agricultural occupation, intervention uptake, and malaria risk. Although less common overall, urban agricultural households remain concentrated in populous regions of several countries. Mediation analysis identified wealth, enhanced vegetation index, treatment-seeking behavior, and housing quality as the strongest mediators of this relationship in both urban and rural settings.
Conclusions
These findings offer actionable insights for countries aiming to better target malaria interventions, particularly in urban areas. The varied mediating factors highlight the need for an integrated approach that addresses housing quality, environmental risk, treatment-seeking behavior, and socioeconomic conditions to protect young children in agricultural households and strengthen malaria control efforts amid shrinking resources.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was co-funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Investment ID: INV-036449) and institutional funds from Loyola University Chicago
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available through Zenodo via the urban-malaria/Agricultural-manuscript: Agriculture-manuscript v1.0 repository, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15831265
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.