Creativity in Economics Education: An Interdisciplinary Experiment with Drawing.

Creativity in Economics Education: An Interdisciplinary Experiment with Drawing. | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Creativity in Economics Education: An Interdisciplinary Experiment with Drawing. Alexandra Codruta Bizoi, Cristian Gabriel Bizoi This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4011148/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Based on Betty Edwards's right-brain drawing methods, this study explored the impact of creative drawing exercises on enhancing cognitive and creative abilities in economics students. Ninety bachelor's and master's students of various nationalities participated in a drawing exercise, followed by a reflection session discussing their experiences and the drawings' significance. The study used a qualitative approach to analyze these experiences and insights. Results showed a marked increase in students' confidence in their creative abilities. Participants reported a refreshed understanding of economic concepts. They overwhelmingly favored the integration of more creative exercises into their economics education, highlighting a beneficial balance between analytical rigor and creative exploration. These findings suggest that combining analytical and artistic techniques in economics pedagogy significantly enhances learning and prepares students for innovative thinking. The promising results encourage further research on the long-term effects of such creative interventions on academic performance and problem-solving in complex economic contexts. JEL codes I21, Z11, D91, I20 Other Economics economics education creative thinking drawing Betty Edwards' method holistic education Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 1. Introduction Our paper explores the impact of creative drawing exercises on economics students' cognitive and creative abilities. It utilizes Betty Edwards' right-brain drawing methods and involves students from diverse nationalities. The study employs a qualitative approach to interpret students' experiences and feedback, noting a significant boost in their confidence and a renewed perspective in understanding economic concepts. The research advocates integrating artistic techniques with analytical methodologies in economics education, aligning with the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) focus on creative thinking. This approach prepares students for innovative and critical thinking in complex scenarios, highlighting the value of interdisciplinary learning and the importance of creativity in education. The essence of education transcends the boundaries of mere knowledge transfer, aiming to cultivate each individual's rich and diverse potential. The profound insights from iconic artists Michelangelo and Van Gogh illuminate the vital role of creativity in this enlightening journey. Michelangelo's insights resonate deeply within the educational context, underscoring the actual creation, anchored in intellectual and emotional depth. As a painter's hand is a conduit, methodologies and textbooks are mere tools in education. Cognitive engagement, critical thinking, and emotional connection bring the essence of learning to life, transcending the bounds of artistic realms and echoing the transformative power of education. With his empowering words, Van Gogh, "If you hear a voice within you say, 'You cannot paint,' then by all means paint, and that voice will be silenced," 2 lays bare the transformative power of resilience and self-belief. Especially in economics education, where students often battle self-doubt, exacerbated by analytical complexities and societal pressures, his words act as a beacon, encouraging learners to counter their inhibitions with innovative and creative spirits. Betty Edwards's (2012) groundbreaking methodology is integral to our exploration. It is renowned for leveraging "right-brain" drawing exercises to unlock latent creative capacities, offering richer insights and enhanced visual and spatial cognition. By harnessing the creative and imaginative facets typically associated with the brain's right hemisphere, her approach promises a fertile ground for experiential learning and profound insights. Against this canvas, it clearly outlines the imperative for creative thinking within economics. We aim to assess the potential of Edwards' methodology in enhancing creativity across diverse academic fields, particularly emphasizing its applicability to economics students. Integrating creativity and analytical insight can metamorphose economics education into a more responsive, holistic, and transformative experience. Such integrative principles must be woven into our educational paradigms to ensure learning environments that embrace economic theories while fostering curiosity, individuality, and creativity. Traditionally, economics education has predominantly emphasized quantitative analysis and theoretical constructs, instructing students to solve problems using tools and techniques focusing on logical reasoning, statistical methodologies, and mathematical modeling. While critical, conventional methods often confine learners within deterministic paradigms, limiting the exploration of alternate, innovative solutions (Allgood et al., 2015). In today's dynamic economic landscape, marked by uncertainties and unprecedented challenges, there is a rising demand for economists capable of transcending established paradigms to formulate innovative solutions to intricate problems. It underscores the pressing need for a diversified, multifaceted approach in economics education, going beyond structured analysis to cultivate creativity, critical thinking, and a holistic perspective among economics students (Paul & Elder, 2008). This evolving recognition fuels our quest to explore pedagogical alternatives like Betty Edwards' methodology, aspiring to meld traditional economic reasoning with the infinite possibilities of creative thinking. 2. Literature Review Education serves as the backbone of any progressive society. In recent years, the role of creativity in teaching has gained recognition as vital in fostering adaptability and innovation in an evolving global landscape. Craft (2001) defines creativity as generating novel yet valuable ideas or solutions. Such creativity is not just a supplement to rote learning. However, it compels a shift towards a holistic, creative, and critical approach in education, which becomes especially vital in economics, where creativity and economic thought are deeply rooted in cognitive functions, offering invaluable perspectives on problem-solving, value creation, and future design. Understanding the significance of creativity in economics is paramount. As a discipline, economics shapes decision-making processes, policy formulations, and the broader trajectory of societal progress. Merging creative approaches with economic thought can enrich our understanding and equip learners to address modern world challenges. Thus, this review zeroes in on economics, spotlighting the transformative potential of weaving creativity into one of society's foundational pillars. 2.1. Defining Creativity and Economic Thought As societies increasingly acknowledge the role of creativity in education, it becomes essential to elucidate how this transformative force interfaces with structured disciplines, notably economics. The study of this synergy unveils strategies to foster innovative approaches in one of the most foundational societal pillars. This section seeks to navigate the transition from general definitions of creativity toward its intimate interplay with economic principles. As elucidated by Becker (1976), economic thought revolves around decisions made in the context of limited resources. This domain integrates principles such as analyzing costs versus benefits, balancing supply and demand, and optimizing utility. Schumpeter (1934) theorized that the foundation of economic progression is intimately linked with creative endeavors, resulting in both product and process advancements. Nevertheless, this interplay is complex. Economic principles not only emerge from but also influence and direct innovative pathways. Our manuscript explores the nuanced interplay between creative faculties and economic thought, citing foundational texts and theories that highlight their mutual dependence. This fact represents a divergence from traditional views, a shift from established norms, and a synthesis of seemingly distinct elements. Historically, we viewed creativity as the bedrock of economic innovation. Similarly, process enhancements, a product of reimagined operations, offer efficiency gains and enhanced competitiveness, as Porter (1985) noted. However, this relationship is not one-dimensional. Economic constructs also shape and guide creative avenues. The principles of economics, especially those related to resource allocation, play a pivotal role in directing creative energies. Cowen (1998) addresses the relationship between the market economy and the arts. It questions whether economic principles of supply and demand support or hinder creativity. He presents the idea that capitalism, often viewed skeptically in the context of culture, is instrumental in promoting diverse artistic expressions. He believes that a thriving capitalist system brings forth highbrow and popular culture, allowing them to coexist and influence one another. Citing historical examples, Cowen points out that many iconic artists, like Shakespeare and Beethoven, were famous in their times, indicating a symbiotic relationship between thriving high culture and robust popular culture. This relationship ensures that varied music forms, from archival recordings to current hits, are available to consumers. A crucial intersection between the two domains is the idea of constraints. Amabile (1983) has stressed that restrictions can paradoxically fuel the creative fire. Similarly, economic constraints, like budgetary ceilings or market saturation, can direct and even refine the scope of creative pursuits, as suggested by Friedman (1966). The interplay between creativity and economics also manifests in feedback mechanisms. The market's reception of an innovative idea offers invaluable insights, honing future creative processes. Moreover, disruptive creative innovations have the potential to redefine traditional economic models, as evidenced by the works of Christensen (1997) on disruptive innovations. Given this intricate relationship, there is an evident need for an educational framework that connects these two domains. An interdisciplinary approach, as advocated by Robinson (2001), where art and economics coexist, can nurture thinkers proficient in creative ideation backed by practical economic rationale. Furthermore, as the economic landscape continually evolves, a foundation rooted in creativity ensures adaptability and resilience, as Pink (2005) posited. Pink (2006) feels that the future will favor individuals with unique cognitive capabilities: those who are creative, innovative, and possess holistic "right-brain" thinking. These are the people who will lead and succeed in the upcoming times. Based on global research, this author identifies six core human skills essential for professional progression and personal satisfaction, offering guidance on honing these talents: design, story, symphony, empathy, play, and meaning. Abdul Kalam (2006) elucidated the interconnectedness of learning, creativity, thinking, knowledge, and economic prosperity. Learning rooted in purpose gives rise to creativity, which lights the spark of knowledge. Such an educational environment fosters intellectual growth and lays the foundation for a flourishing economy. In her TED Talk, Amy Tan delves (2008) deep into the mysterious realm of creativity, offering insights into its nature, origins, and the myriad factors that influence it. Her anecdotes and observations portray the elusive force fueling human creativity and innovation. Tan delves into the origin of creativity—whether it arises from inborn biological traits, like a unique chromosome or distinct neural pattern, or nurtured by our environment and upbringing. She points to potential ties between creative impulses and neurological peculiarities, such as the "van Gogh syndrome" or episodes of temporal lobe seizures. Her analysis suggests that while some might have a natural creative bent, external factors can mold, nourish, or suppress this potential. Central to Tan's discourse is the quest for self-identity. Personal hurdles and societal expectations frequently prompt deep self-reflection, fostering a richer understanding of oneself. Such self-examination and the ensuing moral dilemmas are a potent catalyst for creative thinking. These introspections are especially valuable in disciplines like economics, where diverse viewpoints can enrich interpretations of data and events. Tan touches upon the capriciousness of creativity, positing that unforeseen incidents or "strokes of luck" often trigger innovative insights. This unpredictability mirrors surprising findings in economics when unexpected events reshape our comprehension. Elaborating on her creative methodology, Tan underscores the pivotal roles of association, concentration, and discernment in realizing an idea. She speaks of the ongoing dialogue in the creative process, underlining the quest for personal resonance and significance in one's endeavors. This principle is vital in economics, urging educators to look beyond numbers and delve into the deeper narratives and ramifications. Tan wraps up by emphasizing the transformative might of imagination and empathy. One can genuinely comprehend and connect with the subjects by delving deep into a narrative or concept. In economics education, this means teaching students not only to grasp theories and models but also to tie them to tangible human experiences and tales. Tan's insights underscore the importance of creativity in teaching economics. Even though economics is typically viewed as a fact-based, analytical field, integrating creative elements can introduce novel viewpoints, stimulate analytical reasoning, and engender a more profound grasp of intricate ideas. Educators can foster a more prosperous, integrative learning atmosphere by prompting students to entertain uncertainties, challenge prevailing notions, and appreciate fortuitous outcomes. To sum up, Amy Tan's examination of creativity offers invaluable perspectives that can seamlessly integrate into economics education. Embracing creativity can help bridge the gap between cold data and human experience, fostering a more comprehensive and empathetic understanding of the subject. Burgess (2012) articulates the growing concern that schools de-emphasize subjects like art, music, and physical education. The reason is to prioritize these areas in conventional tests. However, in the broader context of life and the evolving economy, there is a pressing need for creative thinkers, risk-takers, and entrepreneurs. Diamandis and Kotler (2012) critique the contemporary educational hierarchy, prioritizing math and science over art. They argue that the rapid technological advancements and the shift to an information-based economy necessitate an educational system that nourishes creativity. Alan Iny (2013) emphasizes the importance of challenging existing paradigms and thinking "outside the box." Iny's perspective, while directed at businesses, equally applies to education—traditional pedagogical models, especially in subjects like economics, often box students into fixed modes of thinking. To foster genuine understanding and innovative thinking, educators must promote a culture of doubt and inquiry, urging students to question and redefine established norms. Leslie (2014) suggests that societies valuing curiosity and innovation reap benefits in terms of new ideas and scientific advances. Curiosity and the desire to understand and innovate are fundamental to economic and societal progress. Sir Ken Robinson (2018), renowned for advocating reforming education systems, provided a deep insight into creativity in education during his TED Interview. Growing up in Liverpool and being diagnosed with polio at a young age, Robinson's experiences in the unique education system shaped his perspectives on the diverse needs of students. Individuals who recognized his potential and tailored their support to him shaped his education, underscoring the importance of personalized learning. Robinson emphasized that the education system, designed during the Industrial Age, needs to be updated. It originated from the need to cater to the workforce requirements of the 19th century. The system placed a 20% emphasis on professionals and the remaining focus on manual labor. Like factory models with age-based groupings and standardized subjects, such systems do not cater to the diverse ways children learn. Drawing on innovative school models that prioritize a broader curriculum inclusive of arts, music, and experiential learning, Robinson underscored the need for a balanced approach. This balance would entail blending arts with sciences, technology, and mathematics. Moreover, he argued for a democratic approach, empowering students to have a say in their learning journey. While technology has democratized education, offering global access to knowledge, Robinson stressed the irreplaceable value of face-to-face interactions, outdoor experiences, and play in comprehensive student development. Concluding his discourse, Robinson emphasized the uniqueness of every learner. The education system, he proposed, should honor that individuality, fostering environments where students can be innovative and where learning is a collaborative, engaging, and holistic experience. Throughout the interview, Sir Ken Robinson's impassioned plea for reform resonated: Schools must foster creativity, cater to individual needs, and prepare students not just for exams but for the unpredictable challenges of the future. You cannot systematically teach creativity but foster an environment where it may naturally emerge. Vizi Andrei (2019) emphasizes this organic nature of creativity and its centrality in the economic discourse. 2.2. The Brain's Role in Creativity and Learning The delineation of the brain into "left-brained" and "right-brained" functions has been a widely accepted notion for many years (Sperry, 1968). This division posits that the left hemisphere is primarily responsible for logical and analytical tasks, while the right hemisphere governs creativity and intuition. While this simplified perspective has made the brain's complex workings more accessible to the general public, it has also underscored the importance of creativity in human cognition. By highlighting the brain's dual nature, this concept acknowledges the value of analytical precision and imaginative flair, emphasizing that creativity is not just an abstract quality but a fundamental aspect of our neurological framework. The popularization of this idea underscores how deeply intertwined creativity is within our understanding of human intelligence and cognitive function. Still, more recent scientific evaluations have challenged its accuracy (Nielsen et al., 2013; Waters, 2017). However, does this newer understanding negate the potential benefits of methodologies that tap into "right-brain" thinking? We consider the proposed method by Betty Edwards (2012) in her renowned book, "Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain." Edwards posited that traditional educational frameworks often lean towards left-brain functions, perhaps sidelining the immense potential of right-brain capabilities. By introducing exercises stimulating right-hemisphere processes, Edwards advocates for a more encompassing and creative approach to perception and cognition. While her work primarily targeted artistic endeavors, the underlying principles can have profound ramifications in economics and business: Revolutionizing Problem Solving : Edwards' techniques, which foster a holistic perception, can enable professionals to scrutinize economic data and trends from unconventional perspectives. Such an approach may need to find creative solutions often overlooked by standard analytical methods. Innovating Strategy Development : Business strategies benefit from creative and non-linear thinking. Leveraging right-brain processes can lead to distinct strategies, potentially offering businesses a competitive edge. Enhancing Communication : The emphasis on visualization in Edwards' methods can be channeled to better present intricate economic data, ensuring it is understandable and impactful for stakeholders. Augmenting Team Collaboration : Using Edwards-inspired exercises in team-building can create an atmosphere that values diverse viewpoints, fostering collective creative thinking. Redefining Product and Marketing Paradigms : By embracing a right-brain approach, businesses can innovate products that holistically cater to customer needs. Similarly, marketing strategies developed through such a lens can deeply resonate with target demographics. While the brain's intricate workings are still under exploration, the dichotomy of "left-brain" vs. "right-brain" dominance has been re-evaluated and found wanting in nuance. Both hemispheres collaborate in nearly all cognitive tasks. This new understanding should maintain the value of Edwards' methodology. Whether or not one hemisphere "dominates" does not detract from the reality that traditional educational systems might neglect specific cognitive skills, which Edwards' methods address. The essence of her approach is not about hemisphere dominance but tapping into and nurturing failed cognitive processes. 2.3. Integrating Arts in Education: Fostering Creativity in Economics Education Integrating arts-based interventions with academic performance or cognitive skills is a topic that has garnered interest in educational research. While few studies may specifically target economics students, we can extrapolate the implications from studies in other fields to suggest potential benefits for them. A survey by Hetland and Winner (2001) found that arts education, particularly visual arts, improved specific cognitive abilities. These skills include the development of spatial-temporal skills, which are crucial for understanding and interpreting graphs, charts, and other visual data – essential components in economics. Deasy (2002), in his report, "Critical Links: Learning in the Arts and Student Academic and Social Development," highlighted that students exposed to the arts show higher levels of engagement and motivation in their studies. This engagement can translate into a more profound understanding and improved performance in subjects like economics. Arts-based interventions often allow students to connect across disciplines. A study by Bamford (2006) found that integrating arts into the curriculum improved understanding of subjects as diverse as history, mathematics, and science. While research indicates a successful push for integrating arts into educational policies, this has yet to translate into the broad-scale execution of high-quality arts programs at the school level. Global monitoring and assessment of academic standards currently emphasize literacy, mathematics, science, and ICT, neglecting the contributions of arts and cultural experiences to a child's overall education. This gap stems from a limited comprehension of the process required for effective implementation. This interdisciplinary approach can benefit economics students, allowing them to connect economic theories and real-world applications. While directly applying these findings to economics education requires more research, the overarching implications are clear. Integrating arts-based interventions in economics can lead to enhanced cognitive skills, improved creative thinking, increased engagement, and a richer learning experience. Hunter and Frawley (2023) examined the impact of integrating arts-based methods, such as film, art, and music, into a second-year sociological theory course. Based on 2020 survey data from students in this course, they found that this approach boosted students' engagement, understanding of theoretical materials, analytical thinking, writing confidence, applying theory to real-world scenarios, contextualizing historical content, and memory retention of theories. When comparing these results with a 2009 survey, it was evident that the positive reception of this arts-based teaching method has been consistent, underscoring its lasting value in enhancing student learning. As we advance, comprehending and capitalizing on this intricate relationship will become indispensable for emerging leaders, pioneers, and intellectuals. By championing hands-on initiatives, challenging traditional notions, and promoting a culture of curiosity, educators can ignite creativity, equipping the next generation to navigate and mold an unpredictable global scenario. This emphasis on creativity in academia influences broader realms, from shaping economic policies to sculpting national ethos and societal norms. Therefore, embedding creativity within economics is paramount to progressive education and the all-encompassing evolution of individuals and societies. While recent neurological studies offer a nuanced perspective on brain functions, they maintain the value of methodologies like those of Edwards. Instead, they challenge us to embrace our brain's full potential, merging its creative and analytical strengths. By doing so, domains like economics and business can benefit from comprehensive strategies, propelling innovation and sustainable growth. The intricate dance between creativity and economics is profound, with historical and modern scholars offering invaluable insights into their interdependence. From the foundational definitions of creativity by Craft (2001) to the interdisciplinary approach championed by Robinson (2001) and the neurological dimensions presented by Edwards (2012), a common theme emerges the inherent value of merging analytical rigor with an imaginative flair. Furthermore, integrating arts into education is not merely a supplement but an essential ingredient to foster holistic comprehension and innovation in disciplines like economics. It creates an environment where students are encouraged to think expansively, cross traditional boundaries, and see the deeper narratives behind cold data. As we transition into our discussion on methodologies and implications, it is crucial to consider this symbiotic relationship. As posited by various scholars, the future will inevitably favor those who seamlessly blend creativity with economic pragmatism, leading us to re-envision the teaching, learning, and application paradigms in the vast realm of economics. The fusion of creativity and economic thought, as evidenced by the vast body of literature, is not merely an academic exercise. It is a crucial evolution in how we approach education and economic strategy in an increasingly complex world. The synthesis highlighted in this review has demonstrated that creativity is not a frivolous, secondary aspect of learning but a fundamental driver of innovative economic thought. The need for creative problem-solving in economics is paramount for complex global challenges. Traditional models and methods, while foundational, may not suffice in addressing emerging economic dilemmas. The literature underscores that nurturing creativity in financial education prepares future economists, policymakers, and business leaders to think beyond the conventional, connect disparate ideas, and propose imaginative and grounded solutions in solid economic principles. This literature review underlines an overhaul in how we approach economics education, ensuring the core integration of creativity. As educators, policymakers, and researchers, the onus is on us to harness the insights from this literature, pushing the boundaries of what is possible in economics. In essence, the fusion of creativity and economics is not merely about enhancing education; it is about shaping a future where economic solutions are innovative, inclusive, and adaptable to ever-evolving global challenges. 3. Methodology In the dynamic sphere of modern education, especially within disciplines like economics, the capacity to think innovatively and approach problems from diverse angles is paramount. The contemporary economic landscape is increasingly complex, demanding analytical prowess and a fusion of creativity and critical thinking. Our research aims to explore and foster these creative capacities among economics students. Drawing from the intersections of art and analytical thinking, we ventured into the pioneering work of Betty Edwards (2012). Her methodology, while primarily designed for the domain of art, holds profound implications for enhancing the cognitive processes essential for economics. The primary objective of this study is to discern whether Edwards' drawing techniques can be leveraged to augment economics students' creative and analytical faculties, potentially reshaping their perspectives and enhancing their problem-solving skills. We integrated art, science, and economics with this backdrop to catalyze a unique educational experience. The overarching aim is to investigate the feasibility and impact of incorporating Edwards' drawing techniques within the economics curriculum. The study seeks to evaluate whether these techniques can fortify economics students' creative and analytical competencies, potentially broadening their viewpoints and enriching their problem-solving toolkit, namely the Upside-Down Exercise. Betty Edwards' (1989) exploration into the mechanics of drawing led to a fascinating discovery: Students produced more accurate drawings when copying a Picasso piece upside down. The reason, the students revealed, was that they could not identify what they were drawing, and this freed them from preconceived notions. This insight coincided with psychobiologist Roger W. Sperry's (1968) research on brain hemisphere functions. This realization resonated with the author's observations and personal experience in drawing. Diving deep into Sperry's work, the author integrated these findings into her teaching approach, witnessing significant improvements in her students' drawing abilities. Pursuing further education to explore this nexus between Sperry's research and drawing, the author eventually wrote "Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain." This book, first published in 1979, has gained widespread recognition and has been re-edited and updated several times. Various disciplines, from nursing to corporate training and sports coaching, adapted its principles. The author emphasizes the significance of the arts in education, challenging the perception of arts as mere "enrichment" and arguing for its essential role in fostering unique ways of thinking. The author believes arts education equips students with critical-thinking skills, enhancing their ability to approach problems holistically. She advocates for intentional teaching methods that help students connect skills learned in arts to broader academic subjects and problem-solving. 3.1. The Betty Edwards upside-down drawing exercise When presenting objects upside down, they do not appear as expected. We inherently anticipate seeing things in their usual orientation – right side up because our brains match what we see with our stored memories and concepts to recognize and label them. However, when visuals are inverted, the familiar cues are mismatched, leading to brain confusion. Instead of identifying them, we only perceive the shapes and the patterns of light and dark. Recognizing and naming these inverted images, incredibly familiar faces, becomes challenging. This phenomenon is not just limited to faces; even reading our handwriting can be difficult when it has turned upside down. The exercise of upside-down drawing reduces cognitive conflict and allows the brain's right mode (R-mode) to dominate. Betty Edwards presented her students with Picasso's drawing of Igor Stravinsky upside-down, instructing them to replicate it as is, which meant their drawings would also be upside-down. The aim was to prevent the brain's left mode (L-mode), responsible for logical and verbal tasks, from naming and recognizing the shapes, thus letting the R-mode, associated with visual and perceptual tasks, take over. The exercise required certain materials and explicit steps, like focusing on the shape rather than the object's name and trying not to turn the drawing right-side up until completion. The results were intriguing. Drawings created while viewing the picture upside-down were often more accurate than those made when viewing it right-side up because when things are upside-down, the dominant L-mode, which tends to rush to recognize and name things, rejects the task. The R-mode, unaffected by orientation, can then process the image without interference. This state, where one is deeply absorbed in the act of drawing and loses awareness of time, is characteristic of the R-mode. Drawing in this manner improves the skill and offers a pleasurable state of focused consciousness. It provides a break from the constant chatter of the L-mode, possibly explaining the centuries-old adoption of practices like meditation. The pleasure derived from drawing in this state might be due to the quieting of the L-mode. Betty Edwards (2012) recommends practicing this method with more upside-down images to familiarize oneself with the R-mode state and its benefits. We propose the same drawing exercise to our students as Betty Edwards did. We used purposive sampling to select students from both bachelor's and master's levels enrolled in specific economics subjects during the academic years 2021–2022 and 2022–2023. The sample consisted of 90 students, aged between 18 to 45 years, who participated in the study. Participants hailed from diverse cultural backgrounds, including Romanian, Moroccan, French, Haitian, and Tunisian origins. While the study does emphasize the mixed nationalities of the students, there is an opportunity to delve deeper into the international essence of the cohort. Though enrolled in the French line of study, 'Management en Français,' these students hail predominantly from Morocco, Tunisia, and Haiti in the recent academic year. Additionally, including an Erasmus student from France in the previous year adds another layer of international perspective. Although the study did not find notable nuances or differences in perception stemming from these diverse backgrounds, highlighting this international composition could offer insights into the universality of the exercise's impact. It could underscore how students responded similarly to the creative intervention regardless of their diverse backgrounds. The students had their drawing materials for their tasks. We asked them to prepare a white A4 paper and a pencil. Our research was primarily qualitative, so there were no pre-established instruments with known validity and reliability. However, Betty Edwards's method (2012), employed in various settings, inspired us. The data collection procedures assumed briefing the students about the exercise and, later on, instructing them to create the proposed drawing – Picasso's painting of Igor Stravinsky for 40 to 60 minutes of uninterrupted time. Following this, we held a reflection session where students shared insights regarding their drawings and significance, which was primarily an observational study without distinct control or treatment groups. Our study seamlessly integrated digital tools, which is especially crucial during the pandemic constraints of 2021–2022. Leveraging Google Meet, we conducted our drawing exercises online, ensuring interactive and engaging sessions. Complementing this, we employed the Moodle e-learning platform to provide students with necessary theoretical materials and a digital repository of their drawings. In the following academic year, 2022–2023, despite a return to face-to-face interactions, we sustained the use of Moodle for assignments and resources, emphasizing its consistent role in our teaching strategy. Notably, the blend of our creative drawing approach with these digital tools received substantial acclaim from our online students, suggesting the synergistic potential of artistic exercises and e-learning, both during and post-pandemic. 3.2. Qualitative analysis For the qualitative analysis of the students' reflections, we employed a thematic analysis approach that involved meticulously reviewing each student's feedback and identifying recurring themes, sentiments, and insights. After the drawing exercise, we brought the students together for reflection sessions conducted as group discussions. These sessions facilitated open dialogue, allowing students to share their thoughts, experiences, and insights about the drawing process, its significance, and its potential links to economics. To structure the sessions and ensure a comprehensive collection of feedback: We initially prompted students with open-ended questions to encourage a spontaneous sharing of their immediate thoughts and feelings about the exercise. As the discussion evolved, students were encouraged to delve deeper into their experiences, elucidating how the activity influenced their approach to economics or other academic subjects. In half of the sessions (those held online), we also provided students with a feedback request form after the discussion, which allowed them to document any additional insights or suggestions about the exercise and its potential future integration into the course curriculum. The group dynamic was pivotal in fostering a sense of collective understanding, as students could resonate with their peers' experiences, validate their feelings, and even offer diverse perspectives that enriched the overall feedback. Given the study's exploratory nature, the primary researcher was responsible for the analysis to ensure consistency in theme identification. While no multiple researchers reviewed the data and we did not implement specific measures for inter-rater reliability, we took several measures to maintain the integrity of the analysis: Transparency: We documented all reflections verbatim to ensure accurate capture of students' feedback without biases or alterations. Iterative Review: We reviewed the data multiple times to identify all potential themes and ensure we didn't miss any crucial insights.Feedback Loop: Preliminary findings were informally shared with a subset of participants to validate if the identified themes resonated with their experiences and feedback. Documented Rationale: A clear rationale was recorded for each identified theme, capturing the reasoning for its inclusion and the frequency of its occurrence. By using these measures, we aimed to ensure the reliability and authenticity of our findings, given the constraints of not having multiple raters or specific methods for inter-rater reliability. The students' reflections on the drawing exercise can be included into different categories, as follows: Self-awareness and Exploration Responses : Several students expressed interest in more self-exploratory activities. One remarked, "I would suggest diverse tests, for example, for self-awareness, applications, and activities where each student is involved, similar to the drawing exercise." Appreciation of the Right-Brain Exercise Responses : A sentiment shared by many was the enjoyment and value derived from the drawing activity. One student highlighted, "I loved the course where we drew with the right side of the brain, and I am glad I did not miss it." Calls for More Interactive Practices Responses : A recurring feedback was the desire for more interactive and hands-on exercises. A recommendation from one participant was, "I suggest that students be challenged more often with games and practices like 'Draw with the left side of the brain.'" Enjoyment and Interaction Responses : Many students appreciated the light-hearted and interactive nature of the course. One student noted, "I liked that we had good interaction, and during the course, we even had a bit of fun and amusement over a drawing exercise." Surprise at Personal Capabilities Responses : Some students were amazed at their capabilities. A French-speaking student exclaimed, "Brillant! I cannot believe how interesting this approach is. I would NEVER have imagined being able to draw so well!" Overall Positivity Responses : The overall sentiment was overwhelmingly positive, with remarks like "Cool! The best exercise I have done so far!" reflecting students' enthusiasm for the exercise. Request for Recurrence Responses : The majority verbalized that the drawing exercise was fascinating, expressing a keen interest in incorporating more such exercises into their learning journey. These reflections underscore the value of the exercise in not only enhancing the students' creative capabilities and fostering a deeper connection with the course content and one another. It highlights the importance of interactive and experiential learning in higher education settings. Our primary focus was qualitative analysis, highlighting the themes and insights students shared during the reflection session. We did not mention any specific software for data analysis. We briefed all students about the study and obtained their informed verbal consent. We also maintained the confidentiality and privacy of the students' identities and their shared insights throughout the research. Out of the numerous drawings created, we handpicked 24 drawings. With these 24 drawings, we created three separate collages. After the drawing session, we brought the students for a reflection session. They shared their thoughts and insights about the drawing process, the significance of their drawings about this experiment, and its connections to economics. The primary criterion for their selection was the degree of closeness or resemblance to Picasso's painting of Igor Stravinsky. We based this decision on the intention of gauging the effectiveness of the upside-down drawing exercise in facilitating students to recreate intricate artworks with precision. While the selection emphasized resemblance, it is essential to note that this choice did not reflect the students' overall creativity or artistic prowess but rather a measure of the exercise's influence on their drawing abilities in this context. These are the rotated twenty-four drawings (the original ones being upside-down): While our study offers valuable insights, it is imperative to consider the limitations: Selection Bias : Selecting 24 drawings for their resemblance to Picasso's painting of Igor Stravinsky may introduce a bias, which means the chosen drawings might not fully capture all students' perspectives and capabilities since we specifically selected them for their similarity to one particular artwork. Single Reflection Session : Relying on a single reflection session to conclude may limit the depth and breadth of insights we can obtain. Multiple sessions or prolonged engagement might have allowed for more in-depth exploration and understanding of students' experiences and perceptions. Peer Influence : Conducting the reflection in a group setting might have influenced some participants by their peers' opinions or pressured them to conform to a particular viewpoint, potentially compromising the authenticity of their feedback. Having the online feedback form reduced this bias for half of the students. Variability Across Sessions : With the drawings collected over six different sessions spanning two academic years and three economics subjects, there might be variability in the context, mood, and dynamics of each session that could impact the drawings produced. This variability could introduce inconsistencies in the data. Potential Influence of Instructor Expectations : Knowing that the drawings closely resembling Picasso's painting of Igor Stravinsky were preferred might have skewed the students' approach and creativity. They might have received encouragement to mimic that specific artwork instead of expressing their unique perspectives. However, despite their initial reservations and claims of being unable to draw, a significant number were taken aback by the outcome of this experiment, which brings to mind Pablo Picasso's profound observation: "Every child is an artist; the problem is staying an artist when you grow up." 3 This sentiment resonates deeply within the realm of education. It underscores the unbridled creativity and boundless imagination of children, who view the world with relentless wonder. However, as they progress through formal education, this innate artistry often wanes, eclipsed by stringent curricula and standardized evaluations. Picasso's insight is a timely reminder: education should not just shape individuals to fit a predetermined mold but should fervently nurture and uphold the inherent creative essence in every student. The validity of insights was ensured through group reflections, allowing for shared experiences to be discussed and validated among peers to ensure the rigor of our analysis. During the data collection phase, especially when engaging with students, we strived to create a neutral environment where participants felt comfortable sharing their insights without feeling swayed or influenced by preconceived notions. We firmly believe in a researcher's ethical responsibility to remain unbiased. To this end, we integrated regular self-checks and reflections into the research process to ensure the presentation of findings was as genuine and untainted as possible. While the study was primarily qualitative and exploratory, the large sample size and structured reflection sessions aimed to ensure consistent and reliable insights. Given the participants' specific demographic and academic profiles, findings from this research might be most applicable to students in similar educational settings and backgrounds. We need further research to understand if we would observe similar outcomes across different demographics or academic disciplines. This research employed a qualitative approach. Through an artistic and reflective exercise based on Betty Edwards's method, we aimed to explore students' experiences and perceptions regarding enhancing creativity. The rationale for choosing this method was the context in which the contemporary job landscape necessitates a high degree of creativity and the ability to think "outside the box." Today, professions are not just seeking rote knowledge but are emphasizing the importance of innovative and creative approaches to problem-solving. Furthermore, the approach Betty Edwards (2012) developed has demonstrated effectiveness in various contexts, from business workshops to educational spaces, underscoring its capability to foster creativity. Edwards' interventions, particularly within the corporate sphere, have showcased their ability to refine drawing abilities and induce a paradigm shift in participants' problem-solving techniques. Various disciplines, including nursing, corporate training, theater, and athletic coaching, have incorporated her methodology, attesting to the widespread relevance and adaptability of her strategies. The business workshops detailed by Edwards (2012) unveiled a fascinating convergence of drawing and analytical thinking. Utilizing "analog drawing," attendees were empowered to express intricate challenges, leading to profound revelations visually. For instance, drawings from one group illuminated a latent disregard for consumers, while another group discerned a longstanding communication lapse they had inadvertently endured for over a quarter-century. In light of these findings, we chose to implement her techniques. When introduced to her methods, we postulated that students would hone their drawing capabilities and transform their thought processes, setting the stage for heightened innovation and problem-solving prowess. Moreover, Edwards' approach captivated us with its potential to unearth latent dynamics and viewpoints that traditional educational scenarios might need to address. As Edwards herself noted, there is something transformative about drawing – it often brings to the surface what the verbal, conscious mind might overlook or dismiss. In a world where "soft" skills like creativity, adaptability, and innovative thinking are becoming increasingly vital, tools that can hone these abilities are invaluable. The interplay of art, cognitive science, and economics presents a fertile ground for innovative pedagogical approaches. Through a fusion of Betty Edwards' artistic methodologies and the analytical rigor of economics, this research seeks to elevate students' creative capacities and challenge and expand traditional teaching paradigms. 4. Conclusion Our recent inquiry into the interplay between creative drawing exercises and students' understanding of economics has yielded enlightening outcomes. Notably, the exercise fortified students' convictions in their artistic prowess and ushered in fresh, innovative perspectives toward economic theories. The overwhelmingly positive feedback underscores a growing imperative: an economics pedagogy that seamlessly blends rigorous analytical reasoning with expansive creative thinking. With the evident transformational resonance of our findings, we fervently advocate for a sustained integration of artistic techniques in the economics curriculum. This melding enriches students' academic experiences and prepares them for a professional sphere where non-conventional thinking is increasingly prized. Projecting into the future, the tantalizing prospects of the long-term effects of such artistic inclusions beckon. A broader longitudinal study could unravel the sustained impacts of these exercises, potentially revealing their persistent advantages in terms of academic performance, enhanced creativity, and prowess in decoding intricate economic quandaries. In this context, the European Union's Directive on Promoting Creativity and Innovation Through Education and Training (European Commission, 2006) provides a potent affirmation. The emphasis by global institutions like the EU, UNESCO, and OECD on ingraining creativity from foundational educational levels accentuates our research's relevance, echoing the overarching essence: creativity, incubated early in education, is the fulcrum for propelling innovation in a dynamically evolving global landscape. 5. Implications Our exploration carries profound connotations for both the broad swathes of economics education and the nuanced intricacies of curriculum development. A. Implications for Economics Education The revelations from our study eloquently testify to the profound merits of weaving in creative undertakings, such as the drawing exercise predicated on Betty Edwards' approach, into economics education. Within a discipline traditionally steered by quantitative analyses and analytical discernment, an infusion of artistic reflection can: Elevate students' comprehensive grasp of economic paradigms. Cultivate innovative thought paradigms, a sine qua non for grappling with present-day financial intricacies. Amplify students' inherent zeal by resonating with their latent creative flair. B. Recommendations for Curriculum and Pedagogy For educational establishments, the path forward is discernible: Seamlessly intersperse drawing exercises into fundamental economics syllabi, thereby enshrining them as intrinsic elements of the learning trajectory. Exhort educators to partake in training sessions dedicated to mastering creative pedagogies, ensuring adept facilitation of student journeys. Craft-dedicated workshops or colloquiums traverse the fascinating confluence of artistry and economics. Such ventures could enable students to decipher multifaceted topics via artistic channels. Regularly orchestrate reflection congregations and champion unfettered discourses, granting students a platform to interlink their artistic ventures with the core tenets of economics. Declarations Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. References ***, 2006. The European Commission, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/promoting-creativity-and-innovation-through-education-and-training.html, Accessed: August 2023 Allgood, S., Walstad, W.B., Siegfried, J.J., (2015). "Research on Teaching Economics to Undergraduates." Journal of Economic Literature, 53 (2): 285-325. DOI: 10.1257/jel.53.2.285 Amabile, T. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. Springer-Verlag. Bamford, A., (2006). A Child's Rights to Quality Arts and Cultural Education Professor Anne Bamford Wimbledon School of Art, London, http://veille-et-analyses.ens-lyon.fr/LettreVST/pdf/15-fevrier-2006_AnneBamford.pdf, Accessed: August 2023. Becker, G. S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press, https://casdev.unc.edu/ppeprogram/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2020/02/Becker-The-Economic-Approach-to-Human-Behavior-1976.pdf Burgess, D. (2012). Teach Like A Pirate: Increase student engagement, boost your creativity, and transform your life as an educator. San Diego: Dave Burgess Consulting. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press. Cowen, T. (1998). In Praise of Commercial Culture. Harvard University Press. Craft, A. (2001). An Analysis of Research and Literature on Creativity in Education. Report prepared for the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, Coventry, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=b26ff91d08b36522a301e23c84130e8922284e26 Deasy, R., J., (2002). "Critical Links: Learning in the Arts and Student Academic and Social Development," Arts Education Partnership, Washington, DC. Department of Education, Washington, DC.; National Endowment for the Arts (NFAH), Washington, DC. ISBN-1-884037-78-X, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ERIC-ED466413/pdf/ERIC-ED466413.pdf, Accessed: August: 2023. Diamandis, P. H., Kotler, S. (2012). Abundance: The future is better than you think. 1st Free Press hardcover ed. New York, Free Press. Friedman, M. (1966). Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press. https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/envs_5120/friedman_1966.pdf Hetland, L., Winner, E., (2001). The Arts and Academic Achievement: What the Evidence Shows, Arts Education Policy Review 102(5):3-6, DOI: 10.1080/10632910109600008 Hunter, L., & Frawley, E. (2023). Engaging Students Using an Arts-Based Pedagogy: Teaching and Learning Sociological Theory through Film, Art, and Music. Teaching Sociology, 51(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X221096657 Iny, A., (2013). Reigniting creativity in business, Ted Talk, https://www.ted.com/talks/alan_iny_reigniting_creativity_in_business, Accessed: August 2023. Kalam, A.P.J.A., (2006). Indomitable Spirit, Rajpal & Sons, ISBN 9788170286547, https://books.google.ro/books?id=_JHR-Et8ZZIC Leslie, I. (2014). Curious: the desire to know and why your future depends on it. New York, Basic Books, A Member of the Perseus Books Group. Nielsen, J.A., Zielinski, B.A., Ferguson, M.A., Lainhart, J.E., Anderson, J.S., (2013) .An Evaluation of the Left-Brain vs. Right-Brain Hypothesis with Resting State Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging. PLoS ONE 8(8): e71275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071275 Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking. https://www.criticalthinking.org/files/Concepts_Tools.pdf, Accessed: August 2023. Pink, D. H. (2005). A Whole New Mind: Moving from the Information Age to the Conceptual Age. Riverhead Books. Pink, D. H. (2006). A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future. Riverhead Books. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press. Robinson K. (2018). Sir Ken Robinson (still) wants an education revolution, The TED Interview, https://www.ted.com/talks/the_ted_interview_sir_ken_robinson_still_wants_an_education_revolution, Accessed: August 2023. Robinson, K. (2001). Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative. Capstone. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Transaction Publishers. New Brunswick Sperry, R. W. (1968). Hemisphere deconnection and unity in conscious awareness. American Psychologist, 23(10), 723. Tan, A., (2008). Where does creativity hide? Ted Talk, https://www.ted.com/talks/amy_tan_where_does_creativity_hide?, Accessed: August 2023. Vizi, A., (2019). Economy of Truth: Practical Maxims and Reflections, Independently published (September 12, 2019), ISBN 978-1692286255. Waters, E., (2017). The left brain vs. right brain myth, TED-ed, https://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_waters_the_left_brain_vs_right_brain_myth, Accessed: August 2023. Footnotes Source: https://masterpiecesociety.com/100-quotes-art-creativity/ Source: https://masterpiecesociety.com/100-quotes-art-creativity/ Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4011148","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":276166739,"identity":"8dac5060-25f8-49ed-bfe7-9e92684db7bd","order_by":0,"name":"Alexandra Codruta Bizoi","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3913-325X","institution":"WEST UNIVERSITY OF TIMISOARA","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Alexandra","middleName":"Codruta","lastName":"Bizoi","suffix":""},{"id":276166740,"identity":"193b49cd-4260-49f6-ac8a-8ef5d40380c5","order_by":1,"name":"Cristian Gabriel Bizoi","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7202-834X","institution":"WEST UNIVERSITY OF TIMISOARA","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Cristian","middleName":"Gabriel","lastName":"Bizoi","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-03-04 08:38:27","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4011148/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4011148/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":52104275,"identity":"0d77469b-5602-4125-be06-428803147ff1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:23:49","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":310459,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePablo Picasso (1881-1973), Portrait of Igor Stravinsky. Paris, May 21, 1920 (dated). Privately owned.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSource: Betty Edwards (1989)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4011148/v1/374969a6bfed781c269825c3.png"},{"id":52104278,"identity":"8296be91-3b80-4f6f-af38-698deaa8b6ec","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:23:49","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":609290,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEconomics' students' drawings\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSources: Own courses\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4011148/v1/83cc6cd5f9263af1d030454c.png"},{"id":52104277,"identity":"20c82d20-8204-4bef-b7bb-aa3193cd6ec5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:23:49","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":616624,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEconomics' students' drawings\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSources: Own courses\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4011148/v1/847fef79ab0f1d148e75d7b1.png"},{"id":52104276,"identity":"2f00f06b-bdb3-4973-8860-f0c0dad6c0c1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:23:49","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":551806,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEconomics' students' drawings\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSources: Own courses\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4011148/v1/943f65db12fc4c234924ed77.png"},{"id":52105810,"identity":"3cf306cf-424e-4524-9064-2eeb438c6649","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-03-06 19:31:50","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2679754,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4011148/v1/51e96710-1e1a-44ce-b70c-af8c0ee773da.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCreativity in Economics Education: An Interdisciplinary Experiment with Drawing.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eOur paper explores the impact of creative drawing exercises on economics students' cognitive and creative abilities. It utilizes Betty Edwards' right-brain drawing methods and involves students from diverse nationalities. The study employs a qualitative approach to interpret students' experiences and feedback, noting a significant boost in their confidence and a renewed perspective in understanding economic concepts. The research advocates integrating artistic techniques with analytical methodologies in economics education, aligning with the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) focus on creative thinking. This approach prepares students for innovative and critical thinking in complex scenarios, highlighting the value of interdisciplinary learning and the importance of creativity in education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe essence of education transcends the boundaries of mere knowledge transfer, aiming to cultivate each individual's rich and diverse potential. The profound insights from iconic artists Michelangelo and Van Gogh illuminate the vital role of creativity in this enlightening journey.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMichelangelo's insights resonate deeply within the educational context, underscoring the actual creation, anchored in intellectual and emotional depth. As a painter's hand is a conduit, methodologies and textbooks are mere tools in education. Cognitive engagement, critical thinking, and emotional connection bring the essence of learning to life, transcending the bounds of artistic realms and echoing the transformative power of education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWith his empowering words, Van Gogh, \"If you hear a voice within you say, 'You cannot paint,' then by all means paint, and that voice will be silenced,\"\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e lays bare the transformative power of resilience and self-belief. Especially in economics education, where students often battle self-doubt, exacerbated by analytical complexities and societal pressures, his words act as a beacon, encouraging learners to counter their inhibitions with innovative and creative spirits.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBetty Edwards's (2012) groundbreaking methodology is integral to our exploration. It is renowned for leveraging \"right-brain\" drawing exercises to unlock latent creative capacities, offering richer insights and enhanced visual and spatial cognition. By harnessing the creative and imaginative facets typically associated with the brain's right hemisphere, her approach promises a fertile ground for experiential learning and profound insights.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAgainst this canvas, it clearly outlines the imperative for creative thinking within economics. We aim to assess the potential of Edwards' methodology in enhancing creativity across diverse academic fields, particularly emphasizing its applicability to economics students. Integrating creativity and analytical insight can metamorphose economics education into a more responsive, holistic, and transformative experience. Such integrative principles must be woven into our educational paradigms to ensure learning environments that embrace economic theories while fostering curiosity, individuality, and creativity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTraditionally, economics education has predominantly emphasized quantitative analysis and theoretical constructs, instructing students to solve problems using tools and techniques focusing on logical reasoning, statistical methodologies, and mathematical modeling. While critical, conventional methods often confine learners within deterministic paradigms, limiting the exploration of alternate, innovative solutions (Allgood et al., 2015). In today's dynamic economic landscape, marked by uncertainties and unprecedented challenges, there is a rising demand for economists capable of transcending established paradigms to formulate innovative solutions to intricate problems. It underscores the pressing need for a diversified, multifaceted approach in economics education, going beyond structured analysis to cultivate creativity, critical thinking, and a holistic perspective among economics students (Paul \u0026amp; Elder, 2008). This evolving recognition fuels our quest to explore pedagogical alternatives like Betty Edwards' methodology, aspiring to meld traditional economic reasoning with the infinite possibilities of creative thinking.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Literature Review","content":"\u003cp\u003eEducation serves as the backbone of any progressive society. In recent years, the role of creativity in teaching has gained recognition as vital in fostering adaptability and innovation in an evolving global landscape. Craft (2001) defines creativity as generating novel yet valuable ideas or solutions. Such creativity is not just a supplement to rote learning. However, it compels a shift towards a holistic, creative, and critical approach in education, which becomes especially vital in economics, where creativity and economic thought are deeply rooted in cognitive functions, offering invaluable perspectives on problem-solving, value creation, and future design. Understanding the significance of creativity in economics is paramount. As a discipline, economics shapes decision-making processes, policy formulations, and the broader trajectory of societal progress. Merging creative approaches with economic thought can enrich our understanding and equip learners to address modern world challenges. Thus, this review zeroes in on economics, spotlighting the transformative potential of weaving creativity into one of society's foundational pillars.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e2.1. Defining Creativity and Economic Thought\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs societies increasingly acknowledge the role of creativity in education, it becomes essential to elucidate how this transformative force interfaces with structured disciplines, notably economics. The study of this synergy unveils strategies to foster innovative approaches in one of the most foundational societal pillars. This section seeks to navigate the transition from general definitions of creativity toward its intimate interplay with economic principles.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs elucidated by Becker (1976), economic thought revolves around decisions made in the context of limited resources. This domain integrates principles such as analyzing costs versus benefits, balancing supply and demand, and optimizing utility.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSchumpeter (1934) theorized that the foundation of economic progression is intimately linked with creative endeavors, resulting in both product and process advancements. Nevertheless, this interplay is complex. Economic principles not only emerge from but also influence and direct innovative pathways.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOur manuscript explores the nuanced interplay between creative faculties and economic thought, citing foundational texts and theories that highlight their mutual dependence. This fact represents a divergence from traditional views, a shift from established norms, and a synthesis of seemingly distinct elements. Historically, we viewed creativity as the bedrock of economic innovation. Similarly, process enhancements, a product of reimagined operations, offer efficiency gains and enhanced competitiveness, as Porter (1985) noted.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHowever, this relationship is not one-dimensional. Economic constructs also shape and guide creative avenues. The principles of economics, especially those related to resource allocation, play a pivotal role in directing creative energies. Cowen (1998) addresses the relationship between the market economy and the arts. It questions whether economic principles of supply and demand support or hinder creativity. He presents the idea that capitalism, often viewed skeptically in the context of culture, is instrumental in promoting diverse artistic expressions. He believes that a thriving capitalist system brings forth highbrow and popular culture, allowing them to coexist and influence one another. Citing historical examples, Cowen points out that many iconic artists, like Shakespeare and Beethoven, were famous in their times, indicating a symbiotic relationship between thriving high culture and robust popular culture. This relationship ensures that varied music forms, from archival recordings to current hits, are available to consumers. A crucial intersection between the two domains is the idea of constraints.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAmabile (1983) has stressed that restrictions can paradoxically fuel the creative fire. Similarly, economic constraints, like budgetary ceilings or market saturation, can direct and even refine the scope of creative pursuits, as suggested by Friedman (1966). The interplay between creativity and economics also manifests in feedback mechanisms. The market's reception of an innovative idea offers invaluable insights, honing future creative processes. Moreover, disruptive creative innovations have the potential to redefine traditional economic models, as evidenced by the works of Christensen (1997) on disruptive innovations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGiven this intricate relationship, there is an evident need for an educational framework that connects these two domains. An interdisciplinary approach, as advocated by Robinson (2001), where art and economics coexist, can nurture thinkers proficient in creative ideation backed by practical economic rationale. Furthermore, as the economic landscape continually evolves, a foundation rooted in creativity ensures adaptability and resilience, as Pink (2005) posited. Pink (2006) feels that the future will favor individuals with unique cognitive capabilities: those who are creative, innovative, and possess holistic \"right-brain\" thinking. These are the people who will lead and succeed in the upcoming times. Based on global research, this author identifies six core human skills essential for professional progression and personal satisfaction, offering guidance on honing these talents: design, story, symphony, empathy, play, and meaning.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAbdul Kalam (2006) elucidated the interconnectedness of learning, creativity, thinking, knowledge, and economic prosperity. Learning rooted in purpose gives rise to creativity, which lights the spark of knowledge. Such an educational environment fosters intellectual growth and lays the foundation for a flourishing economy.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn her TED Talk, Amy Tan delves (2008) deep into the mysterious realm of creativity, offering insights into its nature, origins, and the myriad factors that influence it. Her anecdotes and observations portray the elusive force fueling human creativity and innovation. Tan delves into the origin of creativity\u0026mdash;whether it arises from inborn biological traits, like a unique chromosome or distinct neural pattern, or nurtured by our environment and upbringing. She points to potential ties between creative impulses and neurological peculiarities, such as the \"van Gogh syndrome\" or episodes of temporal lobe seizures. Her analysis suggests that while some might have a natural creative bent, external factors can mold, nourish, or suppress this potential. Central to Tan's discourse is the quest for self-identity. Personal hurdles and societal expectations frequently prompt deep self-reflection, fostering a richer understanding of oneself.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSuch self-examination and the ensuing moral dilemmas are a potent catalyst for creative thinking. These introspections are especially valuable in disciplines like economics, where diverse viewpoints can enrich interpretations of data and events. Tan touches upon the capriciousness of creativity, positing that unforeseen incidents or \"strokes of luck\" often trigger innovative insights. This unpredictability mirrors surprising findings in economics when unexpected events reshape our comprehension. Elaborating on her creative methodology, Tan underscores the pivotal roles of association, concentration, and discernment in realizing an idea. She speaks of the ongoing dialogue in the creative process, underlining the quest for personal resonance and significance in one's endeavors. This principle is vital in economics, urging educators to look beyond numbers and delve into the deeper narratives and ramifications. Tan wraps up by emphasizing the transformative might of imagination and empathy. One can genuinely comprehend and connect with the subjects by delving deep into a narrative or concept. In economics education, this means teaching students not only to grasp theories and models but also to tie them to tangible human experiences and tales. Tan's insights underscore the importance of creativity in teaching economics. Even though economics is typically viewed as a fact-based, analytical field, integrating creative elements can introduce novel viewpoints, stimulate analytical reasoning, and engender a more profound grasp of intricate ideas. Educators can foster a more prosperous, integrative learning atmosphere by prompting students to entertain uncertainties, challenge prevailing notions, and appreciate fortuitous outcomes. To sum up, Amy Tan's examination of creativity offers invaluable perspectives that can seamlessly integrate into economics education. Embracing creativity can help bridge the gap between cold data and human experience, fostering a more comprehensive and empathetic understanding of the subject.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBurgess (2012) articulates the growing concern that schools de-emphasize subjects like art, music, and physical education. The reason is to prioritize these areas in conventional tests. However, in the broader context of life and the evolving economy, there is a pressing need for creative thinkers, risk-takers, and entrepreneurs.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDiamandis and Kotler (2012) critique the contemporary educational hierarchy, prioritizing math and science over art. They argue that the rapid technological advancements and the shift to an information-based economy necessitate an educational system that nourishes creativity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlan Iny (2013) emphasizes the importance of challenging existing paradigms and thinking \"outside the box.\" Iny's perspective, while directed at businesses, equally applies to education\u0026mdash;traditional pedagogical models, especially in subjects like economics, often box students into fixed modes of thinking. To foster genuine understanding and innovative thinking, educators must promote a culture of doubt and inquiry, urging students to question and redefine established norms.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLeslie (2014) suggests that societies valuing curiosity and innovation reap benefits in terms of new ideas and scientific advances. Curiosity and the desire to understand and innovate are fundamental to economic and societal progress.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSir Ken Robinson (2018), renowned for advocating reforming education systems, provided a deep insight into creativity in education during his TED Interview. Growing up in Liverpool and being diagnosed with polio at a young age, Robinson's experiences in the unique education system shaped his perspectives on the diverse needs of students. Individuals who recognized his potential and tailored their support to him shaped his education, underscoring the importance of personalized learning. Robinson emphasized that the education system, designed during the Industrial Age, needs to be updated. It originated from the need to cater to the workforce requirements of the 19th century. The system placed a 20% emphasis on professionals and the remaining focus on manual labor. Like factory models with age-based groupings and standardized subjects, such systems do not cater to the diverse ways children learn. Drawing on innovative school models that prioritize a broader curriculum inclusive of arts, music, and experiential learning, Robinson underscored the need for a balanced approach. This balance would entail blending arts with sciences, technology, and mathematics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMoreover, he argued for a democratic approach, empowering students to have a say in their learning journey. While technology has democratized education, offering global access to knowledge, Robinson stressed the irreplaceable value of face-to-face interactions, outdoor experiences, and play in comprehensive student development. Concluding his discourse, Robinson emphasized the uniqueness of every learner. The education system, he proposed, should honor that individuality, fostering environments where students can be innovative and where learning is a collaborative, engaging, and holistic experience. Throughout the interview, Sir Ken Robinson's impassioned plea for reform resonated: Schools must foster creativity, cater to individual needs, and prepare students not just for exams but for the unpredictable challenges of the future.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYou cannot systematically teach creativity but foster an environment where it may naturally emerge. Vizi Andrei (2019) emphasizes this organic nature of creativity and its centrality in the economic discourse.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e2.2. The Brain's Role in Creativity and Learning\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe delineation of the brain into \"left-brained\" and \"right-brained\" functions has been a widely accepted notion for many years (Sperry, 1968). This division posits that the left hemisphere is primarily responsible for logical and analytical tasks, while the right hemisphere governs creativity and intuition. While this simplified perspective has made the brain's complex workings more accessible to the general public, it has also underscored the importance of creativity in human cognition. By highlighting the brain's dual nature, this concept acknowledges the value of analytical precision and imaginative flair, emphasizing that creativity is not just an abstract quality but a fundamental aspect of our neurological framework. The popularization of this idea underscores how deeply intertwined creativity is within our understanding of human intelligence and cognitive function. Still, more recent scientific evaluations have challenged its accuracy (Nielsen et al., 2013; Waters, 2017). However, does this newer understanding negate the potential benefits of methodologies that tap into \"right-brain\" thinking? We consider the proposed method by Betty Edwards (2012) in her renowned book, \"Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain.\" Edwards posited that traditional educational frameworks often lean towards left-brain functions, perhaps sidelining the immense potential of right-brain capabilities. By introducing exercises stimulating right-hemisphere processes, Edwards advocates for a more encompassing and creative approach to perception and cognition. While her work primarily targeted artistic endeavors, the underlying principles can have profound ramifications in economics and business:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRevolutionizing Problem Solving\u003c/strong\u003e: Edwards' techniques, which foster a holistic perception, can enable professionals to scrutinize economic data and trends from unconventional perspectives. Such an approach may need to find creative solutions often overlooked by standard analytical methods.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInnovating Strategy Development\u003c/strong\u003e: Business strategies benefit from creative and non-linear thinking. Leveraging right-brain processes can lead to distinct strategies, potentially offering businesses a competitive edge.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEnhancing Communication\u003c/strong\u003e: The emphasis on visualization in Edwards' methods can be channeled to better present intricate economic data, ensuring it is understandable and impactful for stakeholders.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAugmenting Team Collaboration\u003c/strong\u003e: Using Edwards-inspired exercises in team-building can create an atmosphere that values diverse viewpoints, fostering collective creative thinking.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRedefining Product and Marketing Paradigms\u003c/strong\u003e: By embracing a right-brain approach, businesses can innovate products that holistically cater to customer needs. Similarly, marketing strategies developed through such a lens can deeply resonate with target demographics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhile the brain's intricate workings are still under exploration, the dichotomy of \"left-brain\" vs. \"right-brain\" dominance has been re-evaluated and found wanting in nuance. Both hemispheres collaborate in nearly all cognitive tasks. This new understanding should maintain the value of Edwards' methodology. Whether or not one hemisphere \"dominates\" does not detract from the reality that traditional educational systems might neglect specific cognitive skills, which Edwards' methods address. The essence of her approach is not about hemisphere dominance but tapping into and nurturing failed cognitive processes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e2.3. Integrating Arts in Education: Fostering Creativity in Economics Education\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIntegrating arts-based interventions with academic performance or cognitive skills is a topic that has garnered interest in educational research. While few studies may specifically target economics students, we can extrapolate the implications from studies in other fields to suggest potential benefits for them. A survey by Hetland and Winner (2001) found that arts education, particularly visual arts, improved specific cognitive abilities. These skills include the development of spatial-temporal skills, which are crucial for understanding and interpreting graphs, charts, and other visual data \u0026ndash; essential components in economics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDeasy (2002), in his report, \"Critical Links: Learning in the Arts and Student Academic and Social Development,\" highlighted that students exposed to the arts show higher levels of engagement and motivation in their studies. This engagement can translate into a more profound understanding and improved performance in subjects like economics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eArts-based interventions often allow students to connect across disciplines. A study by Bamford (2006) found that integrating arts into the curriculum improved understanding of subjects as diverse as history, mathematics, and science. While research indicates a successful push for integrating arts into educational policies, this has yet to translate into the broad-scale execution of high-quality arts programs at the school level. Global monitoring and assessment of academic standards currently emphasize literacy, mathematics, science, and ICT, neglecting the contributions of arts and cultural experiences to a child's overall education. This gap stems from a limited comprehension of the process required for effective implementation. This interdisciplinary approach can benefit economics students, allowing them to connect economic theories and real-world applications.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhile directly applying these findings to economics education requires more research, the overarching implications are clear. Integrating arts-based interventions in economics can lead to enhanced cognitive skills, improved creative thinking, increased engagement, and a richer learning experience.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHunter and Frawley (2023) examined the impact of integrating arts-based methods, such as film, art, and music, into a second-year sociological theory course. Based on 2020 survey data from students in this course, they found that this approach boosted students' engagement, understanding of theoretical materials, analytical thinking, writing confidence, applying theory to real-world scenarios, contextualizing historical content, and memory retention of theories. When comparing these results with a 2009 survey, it was evident that the positive reception of this arts-based teaching method has been consistent, underscoring its lasting value in enhancing student learning.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs we advance, comprehending and capitalizing on this intricate relationship will become indispensable for emerging leaders, pioneers, and intellectuals. By championing hands-on initiatives, challenging traditional notions, and promoting a culture of curiosity, educators can ignite creativity, equipping the next generation to navigate and mold an unpredictable global scenario. This emphasis on creativity in academia influences broader realms, from shaping economic policies to sculpting national ethos and societal norms. Therefore, embedding creativity within economics is paramount to progressive education and the all-encompassing evolution of individuals and societies. While recent neurological studies offer a nuanced perspective on brain functions, they maintain the value of methodologies like those of Edwards. Instead, they challenge us to embrace our brain's full potential, merging its creative and analytical strengths. By doing so, domains like economics and business can benefit from comprehensive strategies, propelling innovation and sustainable growth.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe intricate dance between creativity and economics is profound, with historical and modern scholars offering invaluable insights into their interdependence. From the foundational definitions of creativity by Craft (2001) to the interdisciplinary approach championed by Robinson (2001) and the neurological dimensions presented by Edwards (2012), a common theme emerges the inherent value of merging analytical rigor with an imaginative flair. Furthermore, integrating arts into education is not merely a supplement but an essential ingredient to foster holistic comprehension and innovation in disciplines like economics. It creates an environment where students are encouraged to think expansively, cross traditional boundaries, and see the deeper narratives behind cold data. As we transition into our discussion on methodologies and implications, it is crucial to consider this symbiotic relationship. As posited by various scholars, the future will inevitably favor those who seamlessly blend creativity with economic pragmatism, leading us to re-envision the teaching, learning, and application paradigms in the vast realm of economics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe fusion of creativity and economic thought, as evidenced by the vast body of literature, is not merely an academic exercise. It is a crucial evolution in how we approach education and economic strategy in an increasingly complex world. The synthesis highlighted in this review has demonstrated that creativity is not a frivolous, secondary aspect of learning but a fundamental driver of innovative economic thought.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe need for creative problem-solving in economics is paramount for complex global challenges. Traditional models and methods, while foundational, may not suffice in addressing emerging economic dilemmas. The literature underscores that nurturing creativity in financial education prepares future economists, policymakers, and business leaders to think beyond the conventional, connect disparate ideas, and propose imaginative and grounded solutions in solid economic principles.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis literature review underlines an overhaul in how we approach economics education, ensuring the core integration of creativity. As educators, policymakers, and researchers, the onus is on us to harness the insights from this literature, pushing the boundaries of what is possible in economics. In essence, the fusion of creativity and economics is not merely about enhancing education; it is about shaping a future where economic solutions are innovative, inclusive, and adaptable to ever-evolving global challenges.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn the dynamic sphere of modern education, especially within disciplines like economics, the capacity to think innovatively and approach problems from diverse angles is paramount. The contemporary economic landscape is increasingly complex, demanding analytical prowess and a fusion of creativity and critical thinking. Our research aims to explore and foster these creative capacities among economics students. Drawing from the intersections of art and analytical thinking, we ventured into the pioneering work of Betty Edwards (2012). Her methodology, while primarily designed for the domain of art, holds profound implications for enhancing the cognitive processes essential for economics. The primary objective of this study is to discern whether Edwards' drawing techniques can be leveraged to augment economics students' creative and analytical faculties, potentially reshaping their perspectives and enhancing their problem-solving skills. We integrated art, science, and economics with this backdrop to catalyze a unique educational experience.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe overarching aim is to investigate the feasibility and impact of incorporating Edwards' drawing techniques within the economics curriculum. The study seeks to evaluate whether these techniques can fortify economics students' creative and analytical competencies, potentially broadening their viewpoints and enriching their problem-solving toolkit, namely the Upside-Down Exercise.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBetty Edwards' (1989) exploration into the mechanics of drawing led to a fascinating discovery: Students produced more accurate drawings when copying a Picasso piece upside down. The reason, the students revealed, was that they could not identify what they were drawing, and this freed them from preconceived notions. This insight coincided with psychobiologist Roger W. Sperry's (1968) research on brain hemisphere functions. This realization resonated with the author's observations and personal experience in drawing. Diving deep into Sperry's work, the author integrated these findings into her teaching approach, witnessing significant improvements in her students' drawing abilities. Pursuing further education to explore this nexus between Sperry's research and drawing, the author eventually wrote \"Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain.\" This book, first published in 1979, has gained widespread recognition and has been re-edited and updated several times. Various disciplines, from nursing to corporate training and sports coaching, adapted its principles. The author emphasizes the significance of the arts in education, challenging the perception of arts as mere \"enrichment\" and arguing for its essential role in fostering unique ways of thinking. The author believes arts education equips students with critical-thinking skills, enhancing their ability to approach problems holistically. She advocates for intentional teaching methods that help students connect skills learned in arts to broader academic subjects and problem-solving.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e3.1. The Betty Edwards upside-down drawing exercise\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen presenting objects upside down, they do not appear as expected. We inherently anticipate seeing things in their usual orientation \u0026ndash; right side up because our brains match what we see with our stored memories and concepts to recognize and label them. However, when visuals are inverted, the familiar cues are mismatched, leading to brain confusion. Instead of identifying them, we only perceive the shapes and the patterns of light and dark. Recognizing and naming these inverted images, incredibly familiar faces, becomes challenging. This phenomenon is not just limited to faces; even reading our handwriting can be difficult when it has turned upside down. The exercise of upside-down drawing reduces cognitive conflict and allows the brain's right mode (R-mode) to dominate. Betty Edwards presented her students with Picasso's drawing of Igor Stravinsky upside-down, instructing them to replicate it as is, which meant their drawings would also be upside-down. The aim was to prevent the brain's left mode (L-mode), responsible for logical and verbal tasks, from naming and recognizing the shapes, thus letting the R-mode, associated with visual and perceptual tasks, take over.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe exercise required certain materials and explicit steps, like focusing on the shape rather than the object's name and trying not to turn the drawing right-side up until completion. The results were intriguing. Drawings created while viewing the picture upside-down were often more accurate than those made when viewing it right-side up because when things are upside-down, the dominant L-mode, which tends to rush to recognize and name things, rejects the task. The R-mode, unaffected by orientation, can then process the image without interference. This state, where one is deeply absorbed in the act of drawing and loses awareness of time, is characteristic of the R-mode.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDrawing in this manner improves the skill and offers a pleasurable state of focused consciousness. It provides a break from the constant chatter of the L-mode, possibly explaining the centuries-old adoption of practices like meditation. The pleasure derived from drawing in this state might be due to the quieting of the L-mode. Betty Edwards (2012) recommends practicing this method with more upside-down images to familiarize oneself with the R-mode state and its benefits.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe propose the same drawing exercise to our students as Betty Edwards did. We used purposive sampling to select students from both bachelor's and master's levels enrolled in specific economics subjects during the academic years 2021\u0026ndash;2022 and 2022\u0026ndash;2023. The sample consisted of 90 students, aged between 18 to 45 years, who participated in the study. Participants hailed from diverse cultural backgrounds, including Romanian, Moroccan, French, Haitian, and Tunisian origins. While the study does emphasize the mixed nationalities of the students, there is an opportunity to delve deeper into the international essence of the cohort. Though enrolled in the French line of study, 'Management en Fran\u0026ccedil;ais,' these students hail predominantly from Morocco, Tunisia, and Haiti in the recent academic year.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, including an Erasmus student from France in the previous year adds another layer of international perspective. Although the study did not find notable nuances or differences in perception stemming from these diverse backgrounds, highlighting this international composition could offer insights into the universality of the exercise's impact. It could underscore how students responded similarly to the creative intervention regardless of their diverse backgrounds.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe students had their drawing materials for their tasks. We asked them to prepare a white A4 paper and a pencil.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOur research was primarily qualitative, so there were no pre-established instruments with known validity and reliability. However, Betty Edwards's method (2012), employed in various settings, inspired us.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe data collection procedures assumed briefing the students about the exercise and, later on, instructing them to create the proposed drawing \u0026ndash; Picasso's painting of Igor Stravinsky for 40 to 60 minutes of uninterrupted time. Following this, we held a reflection session where students shared insights regarding their drawings and significance, which was primarily an observational study without distinct control or treatment groups.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOur study seamlessly integrated digital tools, which is especially crucial during the pandemic constraints of 2021\u0026ndash;2022. Leveraging Google Meet, we conducted our drawing exercises online, ensuring interactive and engaging sessions. Complementing this, we employed the Moodle e-learning platform to provide students with necessary theoretical materials and a digital repository of their drawings. In the following academic year, 2022\u0026ndash;2023, despite a return to face-to-face interactions, we sustained the use of Moodle for assignments and resources, emphasizing its consistent role in our teaching strategy. Notably, the blend of our creative drawing approach with these digital tools received substantial acclaim from our online students, suggesting the synergistic potential of artistic exercises and e-learning, both during and post-pandemic.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003e3.2. Qualitative analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the qualitative analysis of the students' reflections, we employed a thematic analysis approach that involved meticulously reviewing each student's feedback and identifying recurring themes, sentiments, and insights.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAfter the drawing exercise, we brought the students together for reflection sessions conducted as group discussions. These sessions facilitated open dialogue, allowing students to share their thoughts, experiences, and insights about the drawing process, its significance, and its potential links to economics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo structure the sessions and ensure a comprehensive collection of feedback:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe initially prompted students with open-ended questions to encourage a spontaneous sharing of their immediate thoughts and feelings about the exercise.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAs the discussion evolved, students were encouraged to delve deeper into their experiences, elucidating how the activity influenced their approach to economics or other academic subjects.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn half of the sessions (those held online), we also provided students with a feedback request form after the discussion, which allowed them to document any additional insights or suggestions about the exercise and its potential future integration into the course curriculum. The group dynamic was pivotal in fostering a sense of collective understanding, as students could resonate with their peers' experiences, validate their feelings, and even offer diverse perspectives that enriched the overall feedback.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGiven the study's exploratory nature, the primary researcher was responsible for the analysis to ensure consistency in theme identification. While no multiple researchers reviewed the data and we did not implement specific measures for inter-rater reliability, we took several measures to maintain the integrity of the analysis:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTransparency: We documented all reflections verbatim to ensure accurate capture of students' feedback without biases or alterations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIterative Review: We reviewed the data multiple times to identify all potential themes and ensure we didn't miss any crucial insights.Feedback Loop: Preliminary findings were informally shared with a subset of participants to validate if the identified themes resonated with their experiences and feedback.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDocumented Rationale: A clear rationale was recorded for each identified theme, capturing the reasoning for its inclusion and the frequency of its occurrence.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBy using these measures, we aimed to ensure the reliability and authenticity of our findings, given the constraints of not having multiple raters or specific methods for inter-rater reliability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe students' reflections on the drawing exercise can be included into different categories, as follows:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelf-awareness and Exploration Responses\u003c/strong\u003e: Several students expressed interest in more self-exploratory activities. One remarked, \"I would suggest diverse tests, for example, for self-awareness, applications, and activities where each student is involved, similar to the drawing exercise.\"\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAppreciation of the Right-Brain Exercise Responses\u003c/strong\u003e: A sentiment shared by many was the enjoyment and value derived from the drawing activity. One student highlighted, \"I loved the course where we drew with the right side of the brain, and I am glad I did not miss it.\"\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCalls for More Interactive Practices Responses\u003c/strong\u003e: A recurring feedback was the desire for more interactive and hands-on exercises. A recommendation from one participant was, \"I suggest that students be challenged more often with games and practices like 'Draw with the left side of the brain.'\"\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEnjoyment and Interaction Responses\u003c/strong\u003e: Many students appreciated the light-hearted and interactive nature of the course. One student noted, \"I liked that we had good interaction, and during the course, we even had a bit of fun and amusement over a drawing exercise.\"\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSurprise at Personal Capabilities Responses\u003c/strong\u003e: Some students were amazed at their capabilities. A French-speaking student exclaimed, \"Brillant! I cannot believe how interesting this approach is. I would NEVER have imagined being able to draw so well!\"\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOverall Positivity Responses\u003c/strong\u003e: The overall sentiment was overwhelmingly positive, with remarks like \"Cool! The best exercise I have done so far!\" reflecting students' enthusiasm for the exercise.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRequest for Recurrence Responses\u003c/strong\u003e: The majority verbalized that the drawing exercise was fascinating, expressing a keen interest in incorporating more such exercises into their learning journey.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThese reflections underscore the value of the exercise in not only enhancing the students' creative capabilities and fostering a deeper connection with the course content and one another. It highlights the importance of interactive and experiential learning in higher education settings.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOur primary focus was qualitative analysis, highlighting the themes and insights students shared during the reflection session. We did not mention any specific software for data analysis. We briefed all students about the study and obtained their informed verbal consent. We also maintained the confidentiality and privacy of the students' identities and their shared insights throughout the research.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOut of the numerous drawings created, we handpicked 24 drawings. With these 24 drawings, we created three separate collages. After the drawing session, we brought the students for a reflection session. They shared their thoughts and insights about the drawing process, the significance of their drawings about this experiment, and its connections to economics.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe primary criterion for their selection was the degree of closeness or resemblance to Picasso's painting of Igor Stravinsky. We based this decision on the intention of gauging the effectiveness of the upside-down drawing exercise in facilitating students to recreate intricate artworks with precision. While the selection emphasized resemblance, it is essential to note that this choice did not reflect the students' overall creativity or artistic prowess but rather a measure of the exercise's influence on their drawing abilities in this context. These are the rotated twenty-four drawings (the original ones being upside-down):\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhile our study offers valuable insights, it is imperative to consider the limitations:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSelection Bias\u003c/strong\u003e: Selecting 24 drawings for their resemblance to Picasso's painting of Igor Stravinsky may introduce a bias, which means the chosen drawings might not fully capture all students' perspectives and capabilities since we specifically selected them for their similarity to one particular artwork.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSingle Reflection Session\u003c/strong\u003e: Relying on a single reflection session to conclude may limit the depth and breadth of insights we can obtain. Multiple sessions or prolonged engagement might have allowed for more in-depth exploration and understanding of students' experiences and perceptions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePeer Influence\u003c/strong\u003e: Conducting the reflection in a group setting might have influenced some participants by their peers' opinions or pressured them to conform to a particular viewpoint, potentially compromising the authenticity of their feedback. Having the online feedback form reduced this bias for half of the students.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eVariability Across Sessions\u003c/strong\u003e: With the drawings collected over six different sessions spanning two academic years and three economics subjects, there might be variability in the context, mood, and dynamics of each session that could impact the drawings produced. This variability could introduce inconsistencies in the data.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePotential Influence of Instructor Expectations\u003c/strong\u003e: Knowing that the drawings closely resembling Picasso's painting of Igor Stravinsky were preferred might have skewed the students' approach and creativity. They might have received encouragement to mimic that specific artwork instead of expressing their unique perspectives. However, despite their initial reservations and claims of being unable to draw, a significant number were taken aback by the outcome of this experiment, which brings to mind Pablo Picasso's profound observation: \"Every child is an artist; the problem is staying an artist when you grow up.\"\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e\u003ca id=\"#FNLinkFn2\" class=\"FNLink\" href=\"#Fn2\"\u003e\u003c/a\u003e This sentiment resonates deeply within the realm of education. It underscores the unbridled creativity and boundless imagination of children, who view the world with relentless wonder. However, as they progress through formal education, this innate artistry often wanes, eclipsed by stringent curricula and standardized evaluations. Picasso's insight is a timely reminder: education should not just shape individuals to fit a predetermined mold but should fervently nurture and uphold the inherent creative essence in every student.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe validity of insights was ensured through group reflections, allowing for shared experiences to be discussed and validated among peers to ensure the rigor of our analysis.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDuring the data collection phase, especially when engaging with students, we strived to create a neutral environment where participants felt comfortable sharing their insights without feeling swayed or influenced by preconceived notions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe firmly believe in a researcher's ethical responsibility to remain unbiased. To this end, we integrated regular self-checks and reflections into the research process to ensure the presentation of findings was as genuine and untainted as possible. While the study was primarily qualitative and exploratory, the large sample size and structured reflection sessions aimed to ensure consistent and reliable insights.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGiven the participants' specific demographic and academic profiles, findings from this research might be most applicable to students in similar educational settings and backgrounds. We need further research to understand if we would observe similar outcomes across different demographics or academic disciplines.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis research employed a qualitative approach. Through an artistic and reflective exercise based on Betty Edwards's method, we aimed to explore students' experiences and perceptions regarding enhancing creativity.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe rationale for choosing this method was the context in which the contemporary job landscape necessitates a high degree of creativity and the ability to think \"outside the box.\" Today, professions are not just seeking rote knowledge but are emphasizing the importance of innovative and creative approaches to problem-solving. Furthermore, the approach Betty Edwards (2012) developed has demonstrated effectiveness in various contexts, from business workshops to educational spaces, underscoring its capability to foster creativity. Edwards' interventions, particularly within the corporate sphere, have showcased their ability to refine drawing abilities and induce a paradigm shift in participants' problem-solving techniques. Various disciplines, including nursing, corporate training, theater, and athletic coaching, have incorporated her methodology, attesting to the widespread relevance and adaptability of her strategies.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe business workshops detailed by Edwards (2012) unveiled a fascinating convergence of drawing and analytical thinking. Utilizing \"analog drawing,\" attendees were empowered to express intricate challenges, leading to profound revelations visually. For instance, drawings from one group illuminated a latent disregard for consumers, while another group discerned a longstanding communication lapse they had inadvertently endured for over a quarter-century.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn light of these findings, we chose to implement her techniques. When introduced to her methods, we postulated that students would hone their drawing capabilities and transform their thought processes, setting the stage for heightened innovation and problem-solving prowess.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMoreover, Edwards' approach captivated us with its potential to unearth latent dynamics and viewpoints that traditional educational scenarios might need to address. As Edwards herself noted, there is something transformative about drawing \u0026ndash; it often brings to the surface what the verbal, conscious mind might overlook or dismiss. In a world where \"soft\" skills like creativity, adaptability, and innovative thinking are becoming increasingly vital, tools that can hone these abilities are invaluable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe interplay of art, cognitive science, and economics presents a fertile ground for innovative pedagogical approaches. Through a fusion of Betty Edwards' artistic methodologies and the analytical rigor of economics, this research seeks to elevate students' creative capacities and challenge and expand traditional teaching paradigms.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOur recent inquiry into the interplay between creative drawing exercises and students' understanding of economics has yielded enlightening outcomes. Notably, the exercise fortified students' convictions in their artistic prowess and ushered in fresh, innovative perspectives toward economic theories. The overwhelmingly positive feedback underscores a growing imperative: an economics pedagogy that seamlessly blends rigorous analytical reasoning with expansive creative thinking.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWith the evident transformational resonance of our findings, we fervently advocate for a sustained integration of artistic techniques in the economics curriculum. This melding enriches students' academic experiences and prepares them for a professional sphere where non-conventional thinking is increasingly prized.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eProjecting into the future, the tantalizing prospects of the long-term effects of such artistic inclusions beckon. A broader longitudinal study could unravel the sustained impacts of these exercises, potentially revealing their persistent advantages in terms of academic performance, enhanced creativity, and prowess in decoding intricate economic quandaries.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this context, the European Union's Directive on Promoting Creativity and Innovation Through Education and Training (European Commission, 2006) provides a potent affirmation. The emphasis by global institutions like the EU, UNESCO, and OECD on ingraining creativity from foundational educational levels accentuates our research's relevance, echoing the overarching essence: creativity, incubated early in education, is the fulcrum for propelling innovation in a dynamically evolving global landscape.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"5. Implications","content":"\u003cp\u003eOur exploration carries profound connotations for both the broad swathes of economics education and the nuanced intricacies of curriculum development.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eA. Implications for Economics Education\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe revelations from our study eloquently testify to the profound merits of weaving in creative undertakings, such as the drawing exercise predicated on Betty Edwards' approach, into economics education. Within a discipline traditionally steered by quantitative analyses and analytical discernment, an infusion of artistic reflection can:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eElevate students' comprehensive grasp of economic paradigms.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eCultivate innovative thought paradigms, a sine qua non for grappling with present-day financial intricacies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eAmplify students' inherent zeal by resonating with their latent creative flair.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eB. Recommendations for Curriculum and Pedagogy\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor educational establishments, the path forward is discernible:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cul\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeamlessly intersperse drawing exercises into fundamental economics syllabi, thereby enshrining them as intrinsic elements of the learning trajectory.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eExhort educators to partake in training sessions dedicated to mastering creative pedagogies, ensuring adept facilitation of student journeys.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eCraft-dedicated workshops or colloquiums traverse the fascinating confluence of artistry and economics. Such ventures could enable students to decipher multifaceted topics via artistic channels.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegularly orchestrate reflection congregations and champion unfettered discourses, granting students a platform to interlink their artistic ventures with the core tenets of economics.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/ul\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDeclaration of interests\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e***, 2006. The European Commission, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/promoting-creativity-and-innovation-through-education-and-training.html, Accessed: August 2023\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAllgood, S., Walstad, W.B., Siegfried, J.J., (2015). \u0026quot;Research on Teaching Economics to Undergraduates.\u0026quot; Journal of Economic Literature, 53 (2): 285-325. DOI: 10.1257/jel.53.2.285\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmabile, T. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. Springer-Verlag.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBamford, A., (2006). A Child\u0026apos;s Rights to Quality Arts and Cultural Education Professor Anne Bamford Wimbledon School of Art, London, http://veille-et-analyses.ens-lyon.fr/LettreVST/pdf/15-fevrier-2006_AnneBamford.pdf, Accessed: August 2023.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBecker, G. S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press, https://casdev.unc.edu/ppeprogram/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2020/02/Becker-The-Economic-Approach-to-Human-Behavior-1976.pdf\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBurgess, D. (2012). Teach Like A Pirate: Increase student engagement, boost your creativity, and transform your life as an educator. San Diego: Dave Burgess Consulting.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChristensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator\u0026apos;s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCowen, T. (1998). In Praise of Commercial Culture. Harvard University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCraft, A. (2001). An Analysis of Research and Literature on Creativity in Education. Report prepared for the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, Coventry, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1\u0026amp;type=pdf\u0026amp;doi=b26ff91d08b36522a301e23c84130e8922284e26\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDeasy, R., J., (2002). \u0026quot;Critical Links: Learning in the Arts and Student Academic and Social Development,\u0026quot; Arts Education Partnership, Washington, DC. Department of Education, Washington, DC.; National Endowment for the Arts (NFAH), Washington, DC. ISBN-1-884037-78-X, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ERIC-ED466413/pdf/ERIC-ED466413.pdf, Accessed: August: 2023.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDiamandis, P. H., Kotler, S. (2012). Abundance: The future is better than you think. 1st Free Press hardcover ed. New York, Free Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFriedman, M. (1966). Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press. https://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/students/envs_5120/friedman_1966.pdf\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHetland, L., Winner, E., (2001). The Arts and Academic Achievement: What the Evidence Shows, Arts Education Policy Review 102(5):3-6, DOI: 10.1080/10632910109600008\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHunter, L., \u0026amp; Frawley, E. (2023). Engaging Students Using an Arts-Based Pedagogy: Teaching and Learning Sociological Theory through Film, Art, and Music. Teaching Sociology, 51(1), 13\u0026ndash;25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X221096657\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIny, A., (2013). Reigniting creativity in business, Ted Talk, https://www.ted.com/talks/alan_iny_reigniting_creativity_in_business, Accessed: August 2023. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKalam, A.P.J.A., (2006). Indomitable Spirit, Rajpal \u0026amp; Sons, ISBN 9788170286547, https://books.google.ro/books?id=_JHR-Et8ZZIC\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLeslie, I. (2014). Curious: the desire to know and why your future depends on it. New York, Basic Books, A Member of the Perseus Books Group.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNielsen, J.A., Zielinski, B.A., Ferguson, M.A., Lainhart, J.E., Anderson, J.S., (2013) .An Evaluation of the Left-Brain vs. Right-Brain Hypothesis with Resting State Functional Connectivity Magnetic Resonance Imaging. PLoS ONE 8(8): e71275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071275\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePaul, R., \u0026amp; Elder, L. (2008). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking. https://www.criticalthinking.org/files/Concepts_Tools.pdf, Accessed: August 2023.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePink, D. H. (2005). A Whole New Mind: Moving from the Information Age to the Conceptual Age. Riverhead Books.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePink, D. H. (2006). A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future. Riverhead Books.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePorter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRobinson K. (2018). Sir Ken Robinson (still) wants an education revolution, The TED Interview, https://www.ted.com/talks/the_ted_interview_sir_ken_robinson_still_wants_an_education_revolution, Accessed: August 2023.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRobinson, K. (2001). Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative. Capstone.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Transaction Publishers. New Brunswick\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSperry, R. W. (1968). Hemisphere deconnection and unity in conscious awareness. American Psychologist, 23(10), 723.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTan, A., (2008). Where does creativity hide? Ted Talk, https://www.ted.com/talks/amy_tan_where_does_creativity_hide?, Accessed: August 2023.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVizi, A., (2019). Economy of Truth: Practical Maxims and Reflections, Independently published (September 12, 2019), ISBN 978-1692286255.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWaters, E., (2017). The left brain vs. right brain myth, TED-ed, https://www.ted.com/talks/elizabeth_waters_the_left_brain_vs_right_brain_myth, Accessed: August 2023.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Footnotes","content":"\u003col start=\"2\"\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e Source: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://masterpiecesociety.com/100-quotes-art-creativity/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://masterpiecesociety.com/100-quotes-art-creativity/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e Source: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://masterpiecesociety.com/100-quotes-art-creativity/\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://masterpiecesociety.com/100-quotes-art-creativity/\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"West University of Timişoara","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"economics education, creative thinking, drawing, Betty Edwards' method, holistic education","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4011148/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4011148/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eBased on Betty Edwards's right-brain drawing methods, this study explored the impact of creative drawing exercises on enhancing cognitive and creative abilities in economics students. Ninety bachelor's and master's students of various nationalities participated in a drawing exercise, followed by a reflection session discussing their experiences and the drawings' significance. The study used a qualitative approach to analyze these experiences and insights. Results showed a marked increase in students' confidence in their creative abilities. Participants reported a refreshed understanding of economic concepts. They overwhelmingly favored the integration of more creative exercises into their economics education, highlighting a beneficial balance between analytical rigor and creative exploration. These findings suggest that combining analytical and artistic techniques in economics pedagogy significantly enhances learning and prepares students for innovative thinking. The promising results encourage further research on the long-term effects of such creative interventions on academic performance and problem-solving in complex economic contexts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eJEL codes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eI21, Z11, D91, I20\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Creativity in Economics Education: An Interdisciplinary Experiment with Drawing.","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-03-06 19:23:44","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4011148/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"6beed484-7c6f-41ac-8f77-246b786df143","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 6th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":29108297,"name":"Other Economics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-03-06T19:23:44+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-03-06 19:23:44","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4011148","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4011148","identity":"rs-4011148","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}