Stress and Anxiety Among Healthcare Workers Associated with COVID-19 Pandemic in Russia
preprint
OA: gold
publisher-OA-unknown
Abstract
Background: The first COVID-19 cases were diagnosed in Russia on 31 January 2020. By the end of March, many hospitals cancelled all scheduled procedures and started receiving patients with COVID-19. Large group of healthcare workers were involved in the treatment of patients with the novel virus. The mental health of medical workers treating patients with COVID-19 is now becoming an issue of increasing concern worldwide. However, the available data on stress and anxiety symptoms among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 are relatively limited and have not been evaluated in Russia yet. This study had two objectives: first, we aimed to evaluate stress and anxiety symptoms among healthcare workers directly involved in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COVID-19 during the outbreak in Russia. A second objective was to validate the Russian version of new Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics – 9 (SAVE-9) scale. Methods: The study was a cross-sectional hospital-based anonymous on-line survey between May 12th and May 26th, 2020 of 1,090 healthcare workers - 548 physicians [50.2%] and 542 nurses [49.8%] directly involved in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COVID-19 . All the participants were directly involved in the treatment of such patients. Stress and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Russian versions of SAVE-9 and GAD-7 scales. Logistic regression, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin two component factor model, Cronbach's alpha and ROC-analysis were performed to determine the influence of different variables, internal structure and consistency, sensitivity and specificity of SAVE-9 compared with Generalized Anxiety Disorder – 7 (GAD-7). Findings: The median scores on the GAD-7 and SAVE-9 were 5 and 14, respectively. 535 [49.1%] respondents had moderate and 239 [21.9%] had severe anxiety according to selected SAVE-9 total score interpretation by percentiles. 134 participants [12.3%] had severe anxiety, 144 [13.2%] had moderate according to GAD-7. 707 [64.9%] participants often or always have been worried about their family or friends getting infected because of them, 387 [35.5%] – have been more sensitive towards minor physical symptoms. The component model (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin adequacy criterion = 0.847, Barletts' sphericity criterion, p<0.0001) revealed two-factor structure of SAVE-9: 1) “anxiety and somatic concern” included items 2,3,4,8 (EV = 3.497), 2) “social stress” - 1,5,6,7,9 (EV = 1.096). The factor loading of each individual SAVE-9 scale item was greater than 0.5. The regression SAVE-9 model was reliable (-2Log likelihood ratio = 1935.2; p=0.05). Female gender (OR - 0.98, p=0.035) and younger age (OR – 0.65, p=0.035) were associated with higher level of anxiety. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.787 that means good internal consistency. The total score of SAVE-9 with a high degree of confidence predicted the GAD-7 value in comparative ROC analysis. The appropriate cut-off score for SAVE-9 was determined as 18 with good sensitivity and specificity (AUC=0.808, sensitivity = 0.68~0.73, specificity = 0.76~0.8). Interpretation: Healthcare workers in Russia fighting with COVID-19 reported high rates of stress and anxiety similar to other countries and are in need in urgent supportive programs. The Russian version of the SAVE-9 displayed a good ratio of sensitivity to specificity compared with GAD-7 and can be recommended as a screening instrument for detection of stress and anxiety symptoms in healthcare workers during viral outbreak. Funding Statement: The authors received no funding for this work.Declaration of Interests: This research had no specific funding, and all authors declare no competing interests.Ethics Approval Statement: The study and the form of the survey were approved by Local Ethical Committee of Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, and written informed consent for participation was waived
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T02:00:01.467718+00:00
License: publisher-OA-unknown
· commercial use NOT OK
· attribution required