Re-evaluating the Impact of Biological Sex on Atherosclerosis in Apoe−/− and Ldlr−/− mice

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

BACKGROUND The progression of cardiovascular disease shows significant sexual dimorphism: although females generally develop the disease later in life, they exhibit a higher age-related incidence than males. Despite this clinical pattern, preclinical studies often overlook both sexes in their design, and existing research on sex-specific atherosclerosis in mice remains inconsistent. This study was designed to assess the influence of sex on atherosclerosis using two widely used atherosusceptible mouse models—Apoe −/− and Ldlr −/− mice. METHODS To investigate the influence of sex on atherogenesis, we conducted a 20-week study using both male and female Apoe −/− and Ldlr −/− mice. The mice were fed an atherogenic ALMN diet (40% trans-fat, 2% cholesterol, 22% fructose) to promote plaque development. We performed comprehensive analyses of: (1) systemic metabolic parameters (lipid profile, glucose metabolism); (2) atherosclerotic burden ( en face and aortic sinus plaque area); and (3) plaque composition (necrotic core size, collagen content, macrophage infiltration). RESULTS In both models, male mice showed higher lipid levels, worse glucose tolerance, and reduced insulin sensitivity compared to females. Apoe −/− mice showed minimal sex differences in atherosclerosis with a trend toward increased plaque size in females. Plaque stability markers— including collagen content, necrotic core size, and macrophage infiltration—did not differ significantly between sexes. In contrast, Ldlr −/− males exhibited greater en face plaque burden than females, yet plaque stability remained similar across sexes. CONCLUSION Comparative analysis of two widely used murine atherosclerosis models revealed genotype-dependent sexual dimorphism. Female Apoe −/− mice showed a non-significant trend toward larger plaque areas than males, whereas male Ldlr −/− mice developed significantly larger en face atherosclerotic plaques than females. By evaluating plaque area and composition across these models, our findings underscore the importance of including both sexes in atherosclerosis studies, in accordance with guidelines from the National Institutes of Health and the American Heart Association.
Full text 39,074 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Re-evaluating the Impact of Biological Sex on Atherosclerosis in Apoe−/− and Ldlr−/− mice | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Re-evaluating the Impact of Biological Sex on Atherosclerosis in Apoe −/− and Ldlr −/− mice View ORCID Profile Yaping Zhao , View ORCID Profile Li Wang , View ORCID Profile Bradford C. Berk , Hans Strijdom , View ORCID Profile Yu Huang , Jianping Weng , View ORCID Profile Suowen Xu doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.19.677480 Yaping Zhao 1 Department of Endocrinology, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China , Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong , China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Yaping Zhao Li Wang 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong , China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Li Wang Bradford C. Berk 3 Department of Medicine, Aab Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry , Rochester, NY, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Bradford C. Berk Hans Strijdom 4 Centre for Cardio-metabolic Research in Africa, Division of Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University , Cape Town, South Africa Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Yu Huang 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong , China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Yu Huang Jianping Weng 1 Department of Endocrinology, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China , Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China 5 Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Health and Panvascular Diseases , Hefei, 23001, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Suowen Xu 1 Department of Endocrinology, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China , Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China 5 Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Health and Panvascular Diseases , Hefei, 23001, China Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Suowen Xu For correspondence: sxu1984{at}ustc.edu.cn Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF Abstract BACKGROUND The progression of cardiovascular disease shows significant sexual dimorphism: although females generally develop the disease later in life, they exhibit a higher age-related incidence than males. Despite this clinical pattern, preclinical studies often overlook both sexes in their design, and existing research on sex-specific atherosclerosis in mice remains inconsistent. This study was designed to assess the influence of sex on atherosclerosis using two widely used atherosusceptible mouse models—Apoe −/− and Ldlr −/− mice. METHODS To investigate the influence of sex on atherogenesis, we conducted a 20-week study using both male and female Apoe −/− and Ldlr −/− mice. The mice were fed an atherogenic ALMN diet (40% trans-fat, 2% cholesterol, 22% fructose) to promote plaque development. We performed comprehensive analyses of: (1) systemic metabolic parameters (lipid profile, glucose metabolism); (2) atherosclerotic burden ( en face and aortic sinus plaque area); and (3) plaque composition (necrotic core size, collagen content, macrophage infiltration). RESULTS In both models, male mice showed higher lipid levels, worse glucose tolerance, and reduced insulin sensitivity compared to females. Apoe −/− mice showed minimal sex differences in atherosclerosis with a trend toward increased plaque size in females. Plaque stability markers— including collagen content, necrotic core size, and macrophage infiltration—did not differ significantly between sexes. In contrast, Ldlr −/− males exhibited greater en face plaque burden than females, yet plaque stability remained similar across sexes. CONCLUSION Comparative analysis of two widely used murine atherosclerosis models revealed genotype-dependent sexual dimorphism. Female Apoe −/− mice showed a non-significant trend toward larger plaque areas than males, whereas male Ldlr −/− mice developed significantly larger en face atherosclerotic plaques than females. By evaluating plaque area and composition across these models, our findings underscore the importance of including both sexes in atherosclerosis studies, in accordance with guidelines from the National Institutes of Health and the American Heart Association. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains one of the leading causes of global mortality, with significant gender disparities observed in its incidence, clinical manifestations, complications, and risk factors 1 . Women typically experience a later onset of CVD compared to men, but the prevalence in women catches up to or even surpasses that in men in older age groups, particularly in women of postmenopausal age. Additionally, women often present with a higher burden of complications and risk factors 2 . Notably, women’s coronary atherosclerotic plaques undergo an age-dependent phenotypic shift from stable fibrous lesions to vulnerable plaques, progressively reducing inter-sex differences in plaque characteristics—a transition partially attributed to post-menopausal estrogen decline 3 , 4 . Understanding the mechanisms underlying these sex differences in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is crucial for refining diagnostic and therapeutic approaches and developing targeted treatment strategies 5 . Current research demonstrates that sex disparities in cardiovascular disease arise from differences in sex hormones 6 , sex chromosomes 7 , lipid metabolism, and immune responses 8 , with recent studies further revealing sexually dimorphic subcellular profiles in atherosclerotic plaques 9 . However, findings across animal studies are often inconsistent, potentially due to variations in experimental models, dietary regimens, and feeding protocols. To address the variability introduced by mouse models, we employed two widely used experimental mouse models, Apoe −/− mice and Ldlr −/− mice, to investigate sex differences in atherosclerosis under high-fat, high-fructose and high-cholesterol diets. This approach seeks to provide more reliable and translatable insights gained from the sex disparities observed in preclinical mouse models. Moreover, these findings could provide valuable guidance for selecting appropriate mouse models in preclinical atherosclerosis research. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data availability All supporting data are available within the article and its supplementary online files. Study design In this study, two genetically modified and widely used mouse strains 10 , Apoe −/− and Ldlr −/− mice were utilized to investigate the effects of biological sex on the development of atherosclerosis and experiments were performed at the same time in both strains and both sexes. Mice of both genders were housed under a standard specific pathogen-free (SPF) environment maintained at approximately 22°C. The environment adhered to a 12-hour light-dark cycle. Mice were fed an atherogenic diet (AMLN diet, Dyets) (40% trans-fat, 2% cholesterol and 22% fructose) 11 at 8 weeks old for twenty weeks to induce atherosclerosis development. At the end of the feeding period, mice were anesthetized, and tissue samples were collected for analysis. All animal procedures were conducted in the SPF Animal Husbandry Facility at the Laboratory Animal Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC). The study protocol was approved by the USTC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Ethics Approval Number: USTCACUC27120124102). Body Composition Analysis Prior to sampling, mice were weighed, and body composition (fat mass and lean mass) was measured using a body fat analyzer (Bruker Minispec Plus). Blood Cell and Serum lipid analysis Two drops of fresh blood were collected from each mouse into anticoagulant tubes and analyzed for hematocrit composition using a fully automated blood cell analyzer (Mindray, BC-30 Vet). For serum lipid analysis, whole blood was allowed to clot at room temperature for 2 hours, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant serum was collected and stored at −80°C until further analysis. Serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol were measured using a fully automated biochemical analyzer (Shenzhen Radiometer Life Technology; Chemray 240) with a commercial kit (Radiometer/Changchun Huili). Atherosclerosis analysis Atherosclerotic plaque formation was assessed in the en face aorta and aortic sinus using Oil Red O staining 12 , 13 . En face aortic vessels and heart tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 24 hours. Perivascular fat was removed from the aorta, and the vessels were dissected to expose the inner surface. The aorta was briefly immersed in 60% isopropanol for 10 seconds, followed by staining with 0.3% Oil Red O for 10 minutes. Excess stain was washed off with 60% isopropanol, and the aorta was photographed against a white background. Plaque area was quantified using ImageJ software. For aortic sinus analysis, fixed heart tissues were dehydrated in 20% sucrose solution for 48 hours, embedded in OCT compound, and frozen at −80°C. The aortic sinus was sectioned into 10 μm-thick slices using a cryostat (Leica, CM3050s, Germany). Plaque staining and quantification were performed as described above. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and Masson’s trichrome staining were conducted on aortic sinus sections to analyze necrotic core area and collagen deposition, respectively. The necrotic core was defined as the cell-free area within plaques in H&E-stained sections. IPGTT and ITT Glucose and insulin tolerance were assessed in mice after 13-14 weeks on the AMLN diet. For the IPGTT, mice were fasted for 16 hours and then injected intraperitoneally with a glucose solution (0.15 g/mL) (Sangon; A501991) at a dose of 1.5 g/kg body weight. Blood glucose levels were measured via tail vein sampling at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes post-injection using blood glucose meter (Viva check; NB-loT). For the ITT, mice were fasted for 4 hours and injected intraperitoneally with an insulin solution (0.05 U/mL) (Humalog; VL7516) at a dose of 0.5 U/kg body weight. Blood glucose levels were measured via tail vein sampling at the same time points as described for the IPGTT. Liver TC and TG analysis Approximately 100 mg of liver tissue was weighed and placed in a microcentrifuge tube. Nine hundred microliters of isopropanol and grinding beads were added, and the tissue was homogenized using an automated grinder. The homogenate was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected for analysis. Liver TC and TG levels were measured using the Total Cholesterol (TC) Colorimetric Assay Kit (Elabscience; E-BC-K109-M) and the Triglyceride (TG) Colorimetric Assay Kit (Elabscience; E-BC-K261-M), respectively, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Immunofluorescence Staining Aortic sinus cryosections were allowed to equilibrate to room temperature for 30 minutes and then rehydrated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 5-10 minutes. Sections were permeabilized and blocked using a solution containing 5% goat serum and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 minutes. Primary antibodies against CD68 (BIORAD, MCA1957GA) were diluted and applied to the sections, followed by overnight incubation at 4°C. Unbound antibodies were washed away with PBS, and sections were incubated with fluorescent secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor goat anti-rat 488, no. A48255) for 1 hour in the dark. Finally, sections were mounted using an anti-fade mounting medium containing DAPI (Beyotime Biotechnology) to counterstain nuclei. Images were acquired using a Leica Confocal Microscope (Leica, TCS SP8 X). Statistical Analysis All data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test and for homogeneity of variance using the Brown-Forsythe test. Parametric tests were applied to data meeting these assumptions, while non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U test) were used for data that did not meet the assumptions. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and error bars in graphs represent SD, with p<0.05 regarded as statistically significant. RESULTS Apoe −/− mice showed minimal sex difference in atherosclerosis Previous studies have reported that in regular chow-fed Apoe −/− mice, males develop more aortic plaques than females with age, potentially due to estrogen-mediated regulation of macrophage cholesterol efflux 14 . However, conflicting evidence suggests that female Apoe −/− mice exhibit worse vascular endothelial cell function and develop more atherosclerosis, particularly when fed a proatherogenic Western diet 15 . To further investigate whether a high-fat, high-cholesterol diet exacerbates atherosclerosis in females and to explore sex-specific metabolic and atherosclerotic characteristics, we conducted atherosclerosis modeling in both male and female Apoe −/− mice fed an AMLN diet for 20 weeks. Body composition analysis after 20 weeks revealed that while male mice consistently had higher body weights than females, they showed a non-significant trend toward lower fat mass (9.46 ± 3.46% vs. 11.43 ± 2.77%, P = 0.0947) ( Fig. 1A ). Random blood glucose levels were higher in males compared to females (8.31 ± 1.64 mmol/L vs. 5.47 ± 1.07 mmol/L, P = 0.0003) ( Fig. 1A ). Glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity tests conducted at 13-14 weeks showed females demonstrated better glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity than males ( Fig. 1B ). Lipid profiling after 20 weeks indicated that males had significantly higher levels of TC (14.95 ± 1.16 mmol/L vs. 11.24 ± 1.06 mmol/L, P < 0.0001), TG (2.58 ± 0.51 mmol/L vs. 1.75 ± 0.31 mmol/L, P = 0.0005), LDL-cholesterol (3.33 ± 0.26 mmol/L vs. 2.35 ± 0.32 mmol/L, P < 0.0001) and HDL-cholesterol (8.72 ± 0.88 mmol/L vs. 6.44 ± 0.65 mmol/L, P < 0.0001) compared to females ( Fig. 1C ). However, females showed significantly higher liver TC (57.85 ± 9.69 mmol/g vs. 45.53 ± 8.51 mmol/g, P = 0.0094) and TG (45.81 ± 6.13 mmol/g vs. 32.33 ± 6.31 mmol/g, P = 0.0002) levels compared to males ( Fig. 1C ). Analysis of immune cell composition in the blood revealed males had lower neutrophil percentages (43.56 ± 7.30% vs. 53.70 ± 9.12%, P = 0.0213) but higher lymphocyte percentages (49.44 ± 7.43% vs. 39.84 ± 8.36%, P = 0.0219) relative to females, with no sex difference in monocyte levels (7 ± 0.76% vs. 6.46 ± 1.16%, P = 0.3955) ( Fig. 1D ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Metabolic and atherosclerotic characteristics of male and female Apoe −/− mice A. Eight-week-old male and female Apoe −/− mice were fed an AMLN diet for 20 weeks to induce atherosclerosis. Fat mass, lean mass and random blood glucose were measured at endpoint (n = 9-10/group). Fat mass and lean mass were analyzed by Mann-Whitney test and random blood glucose was analyzed by unpaired t test. B. Glucose tolerance tests at week 13 (n = 9-10/group). Area under curve (AUC) comparison between sex were performed using Mann-Whitney test. Insulin tolerance tests at week 14 (n = 9-10/group). AUC comparison was analyzed by Mann-Whitney test. C. Serum lipid profiles (TC, TG, LDL, HDL) and Liver TC and TG were measured at endpoint (n = 9-10/group). unpaired t test was used in the data analyzation. D. Blood cell composition was measured at endpoint (n = 8-10/group). Gran% and Lym% were analyzed by unpaired t test. Mon% was analyzed by Mann-Whitney test. E. Aortic en face Oil Red O staining and plaque quantification (n = 9-10/group). Scale bar: 1 mm. unpaired t test was used in the data analyzation. F. Aortic sinus sections Oil Red O staining and plaque area quantification (n = 9-10/group). Scale bar: 250 μm. unpaired t test was used in the data analyzation. HE staining of aortic sinus sections and necrotic core area quantification (n = 7-10/group). Main panel scale bar: 500 μm; inset: 62.5 μm. unpaired t test was used in the data analyzation. Masson’s trichrome staining of aortic sinus sections and collagen content quantification (n = 5/group). Scale bar: 500 μm. unpaired t test was used in the data analyzation. CD68 immunofluorescence staining of aortic sinus sections and macrophage infiltration quantification (n = 9-10/group). Scale bar: 250 μm. Mann-Whitney test was used in the data analyzation. All N numbers given represent biological replicates. Oil Red O staining of the aorta revealed that, contrary to the lipid and metabolic profiles, males didn’t have larger en face plaque areas than females (39.67 ± 3.96% vs. 44.58 ± 7.55%, P = 0.1000) ( Fig. 1E ). Similar results were observed in aortic sinus sections (728490 ± 145456 μm 2 vs. 843727 ± 106711 μm 2 , P = 0.0637), with females exhibited a non-significant tendency toward larger plaques ( Fig. 1F ). Additionally, statistical analysis of necrotic core area (6.43 ± 1.61% vs. 7.1 ± 1.64%, P = 0.4174), collagen content (53.42 ± 4.88% vs. 59.4 ± 10.1%, P = 0.2678) and macrophage infiltration (10.38 ± 5.79% vs. 8.28 ± 3.45%, P = 0.5490) didn’t show any sex differences ( Fig. 1F ). The Ldlr −/− male mice exhibits larger en face plaques than females After 20 weeks of modeling, unlike Apoe −/− mice, male Ldlr −/− mice had significantly higher body fat mass than females (30.99 ± 3.02% vs. 20.16 ± 3.63%, P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 2A ). Although random blood glucose levels (6.6 ± 0.85 mmol/L vs. 6.76 ± 1.48 mmol/L, P = 0.7717) showed no significant differences between sexes ( Fig. 2A ), glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity tests conducted at 13-14 weeks revealed that females had better glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity than males ( Fig. 2B ). Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Metabolic and atherosclerotic characteristics of male and female Ldlr −/− mice A.Eight-week-old male and female Ldlr −/− mice were fed an AMLN diet for 20 weeks to induce atherosclerosis. Fat mass, lean mass and random blood glucose were measured at endpoint (n = 10/group). Fat mass and random blood glucose were analyzed by unpaired t test and lean mass was analyzed by Mann-Whitney test. B. Glucose tolerance tests at week 13 (n = 10/group). Area under curve (AUC) comparison between sex were performed using unpaired t test. Insulin tolerance tests at week 14 (n = 9-10/group). AUC comparison was analyzed by Welch’s t test. C. Serum lipid profiles (TC, TG, LDL, HDL) and Liver TC and TG were measured at endpoint (n = 10/group). TC was analyzed by Welch’s t test. TG was analyzed by Mann-Whitney test. LDL, HDL, Liver TC and Liver TG were analyzed by unpaired t test. D. Blood cell composition was measured at endpoint (n = 10/group). Gran% and Lym% were analyzed by Welch’s t test. Mon% was analyzed by Mann-Whitney test. E. Aortic en face Oil Red O staining and plaque quantification (n = 10/group). Scale bar: 1 mm. unpaired t test was used in the data analyzation. F. Aortic sinus sections Oil Red O staining and plaque area quantification (n = 9-10/group). Scale bar: 250 μm. unpaired t test was used in the data analyzation. HE staining of aortic sinus sections and necrotic core area quantification (n = 10/group). Main panel scale bar: 500 μm; inset: 62.5 μm. unpaired t test was used in the data analyzation. Masson’s trichrome staining of aortic sinus sections and collagen content quantification (n = 4-5/group). Scale bar: 500 μm. unpaired t test was used in the data analyzation. CD68 immunofluorescence staining of aortic sinus sections and macrophage infiltration quantification (n = 10/group). Scale bar: 250 μm. unpaired t test was used in the data analyzation. All N numbers given represent biological replicates. Similar to Apoe −/− mice, lipid profiling indicated males had significantly higher levels of TC (35.16 ± 3.4 mmol/L vs. 21.36 ± 1.63 mmol/L, P < 0.0001), TG (5.86 ± 1.22 mmol/L vs. 1.99 ± 0.44 mmol/L, P < 0.0001), LDL-cholesterol (12.88 ± 1.71 mmol/L vs. 7.16 ± 1.07 mmol/L, P < 0.0001) and HDL-cholesterol (2.96 ± 0.18 mmol/L vs. 2.08 ± 0.29 mmol/L, P < 0.0001) compared to females ( Fig. 2C ), and females again showed greater hepatic TG accumulation (85.41 ± 9.16 mmol/g vs. 71.46 ± 6.51 mmol/g, P = 0.001), but not TC (64.03 ± 6.46 mmol/g vs. 66.5 ± 4.74 mmol/g, P = 0.3431) ( Fig. 2C ). Interestingly, the leukocyte profile in Ldlr −/− mice contrasted with Apoe −/− mice: males had higher neutrophil (40.63 ± 11.55% vs. 23.29 ± 3.87%, P = 0.0009) and lower lymphocyte percentages (53.09 ± 12.03% vs. 71.48 ± 4.02%, P = 0.0008) compared to females, with a non-significant increase in monocytes (6.28 ± 1.47% vs. 5.23 ± 0.86%, P = 0.0782) ( Fig. 2D ). Consistent with these findings, en face plaque area was significantly greater in male Ldlr −/− mice (32.06 ± 5.51% vs. 25.04 ± 7.82%, P = 0.0323) ( Fig. 2E ), though aortic sinus plaque characteristics including area (675333 ± 109424 μm 2 vs. 704539 ± 127329 μm 2 , P = 0.6009), collagen content (36.03 ± 16.48% vs. 47.80 ± 17.44%, P = 0.3375), necrotic core size (7.8 ± 4.42% vs. 8.47 ± 3.8%, P = 0.7184), and macrophage infiltration (12.69 ± 4.82% vs. 9.95 ± 5.4%, P = 0.2487) showed no sex-based differences ( Fig. 2F ). DISCUSSION Sex is an important biological variable in preclinical animal-based atherosclerosis research. However, the comparative analysis of both sexes in two widely used mouse models of atherosclerosis in one study has not been conducted yet. In this study, we demonstrate that the development of atherosclerosis exhibits distinct patterns of sexual dimorphism between Apoe −/− and Ldlr −/− mouse models. In Apoe −/− mice, females develop a non-significant greater atherosclerotic burden than males. In contrast, Ldlr −/− males displayed increased en face plaque area compared to females. Our study carries important implications in vascular biology research, which provide unequivocal evidence in support of including both male and female mice in preclinical atherosclerosis research studies. Our findings are consistent with a previous comparative study involving both sexes of mice, in which Apoe −/− control mice similarly exhibited smaller atherosclerotic plaques in males compared to females, observed in both the aortic arch and sinus, with no difference in relative necrotic core area 16 . However, given that male mice exhibited less favorable lipid profiles and impaired insulin sensitivity compared to females in the present study, the metabolic parameters cannot account for the observed atheroprotection in males. This strongly suggests the involvement of other sex-specific protective mechanisms in male mice. Existing literature supports the protective role of androgens in Apoe −/− mice. Wang et al. demonstrated that testosterone supplementation in castrated males reduced atherosclerotic plaque formation 17 , while Luo et al. identified that androgens exert cardioprotective effects by activating ADTRP transcription, thereby modulating monocyte adhesion 18 . Additionally, studies have reported that female Apoe −/− mice may exhibit an enhanced immune response to oxidized low-density lipoprotein, which could contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis development 19 . Therefore, sex hormones may represent a key factor contributing to sex-based differences in atherosclerosis in Apoe −/− mice. Moreover, variations in experimental outcomes across studies may arise from differences in diet, modeling duration, and the anatomical sites selected for atherosclerotic lesion assessment. From another perspective, the AMLN diet is also used to induce metabolic dysfunction - associated steatohepatitis (MASH), which can exacerbate liver damage and influence atherosclerosis progression. Female Apoe −/− mice exhibit higher hepatic levels of total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TG) than males, suggesting that sex-specific lipid accumulation and associated liver injury may indirectly contribute to the progression of atherosclerosis. Furthermore, while Ldlr −/− mice fed a standard high-fat diet (HFD) typically exhibit higher blood lipid levels in females than in males 6 , 7 , 20 , the present study revealed that Ldlr −/− males fed an AMLN diet showed significantly elevated lipid levels compared to females. This may partly explain the more severe aortic plaque area observed in male Ldlr −/− mice. In summary, murine models exhibit strain-dependent sexual dimorphism in atherosclerosis development, with divergent (even opposing) sex differences observed between Apoe −/− and Ldlr −/− mice. However, both models demonstrate consistent sex-specific metabolic patterns: male mice consistently display elevated lipid profiles and reduced insulin sensitivity compared to females. Our study provides a valuable resource for the comparative analysis of glucose, lipid profile, plaque area, plaque composition in Apoe −/− and Ldlr −/− mice, which provides a useful resource for future atherosclerosis research. ARTICLE INFORMATION Source of Funding This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82370444, 12411530127). This work was also supported by the Program for Innovative Research Team of The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (CXGG02). This study was also supported by USTC Research Funds of the Double First-Class Initiative (YD9110002089) and the Research Funds of Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM. Author contributions Conceptualization, Suowen Xu; Investigation, Yaping Zhao; Writing – original draft, Yaping Zhao; Writing-review and editing, Li Wang, Yu Huang, Hans Strijdom, Suowen Xu, Jianping Weng and Bradford C. Berk. Disclosures of interests The authors declare no competing interests. Acknowledgments None References 1. ↵ Haider , A. ; Bengs , S. ; Luu , J. ; Osto , E. ; Siller-Matula , J. M. ; Muka , T. ; Gebhard , C. , Sex and gender in cardiovascular medicine: presentation and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome . Eur Heart J 2020 , 41 ( 13 ), 1328 – 1336 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Man , J. J. ; Beckman , J. A. ; Jaffe , I. Z. , Sex as a Biological Variable in Atherosclerosis . Circ Res 2020 , 126 ( 9 ), 1297 – 1319 . OpenUrl PubMed 3. ↵ Gurgoglione , F. L. ; Solinas , E. ; Pfleiderer , B. ; Vezzani , A. ; Niccoli , G. , Coronary atherosclerotic plaque phenotype and physiopathologic mechanisms: Is there an influence of sex? Insights from intracoronary imaging . Atherosclerosis 2023 , 384 , 117273 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ Nour , J. ; Bonacina , F. ; Norata , G. D. , Gonadal sex vs genetic sex in experimental atherosclerosis . Atherosclerosis 2023 , 384 , 117277 . OpenUrl PubMed 5. ↵ Roeters van Lennep , J. E. ; Öörni , K. ; Binder , C. J. ; Kronenberg , F. ; Mallat , Z. ; Raggi , P. ; Benn , M. ; Afzal , S. ; Holven , K. B. ; Kayikcioglu , M. ; Laufs , U. ; Liberopoulos , E. ; Ray , K. K. ; Nordestgaard , B. G. ; Boren , J. , The essential role of sex and gender in atherosclerosis research: A statement from the Editorial Board of Atherosclerosis and Executive Committee of the European Atherosclerosis Society . Atherosclerosis 2025 , 407 , 120403 . OpenUrl PubMed 6. ↵ Liu , S. L. ; Bajpai , A. ; Hawthorne , E. A. ; Bae , Y. ; Castagnino , P. ; Monslow , J. ; Puré , E. ; Spiller , K. L. ; Assoian , R. K. , Cardiovascular protection in females linked to estrogen-dependent inhibition of arterial stiffening and macrophage MMP12 . JCI Insight 2019 , 4 ( 1 ). 7. ↵ AlSiraj , Y. ; Chen , X. ; Thatcher , S. E. ; Temel , R. E. ; Cai , L. ; Blalock , E. ; Katz , W. ; Ali , H. M. ; Petriello , M. ; Deng , P. ; Morris , A. J. ; Wang , X. ; Lusis , A. J. ; Arnold , A. P. ; Reue , K. ; Thompson , K. ; Tso , P. ; Cassis , L. A. , XX sex chromosome complement promotes atherosclerosis in mice . Nat Commun 2019 , 10 ( 1 ), 2631 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 8. ↵ Chait , A. ; Wang , S. ; Goodspeed , L. ; Gomes , D. ; Turk , K. E. ; Wietecha , T. ; Tang , J. ; Storey , C. ; O’Brien , K. D. ; Rubinow , K. B. ; Tang , C. ; Vaisar , T. ; Gharib , S. A. ; Lusis , A. J. ; Den Hartigh , L. J. , Sexually Dimorphic Relationships Among Saa3 (Serum Amyloid A3), Inflammation, and Cholesterol Metabolism Modulate Atherosclerosis in Mice . Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2021 , 41 ( 6 ), e299 – e313 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. ↵ Sukhavasi , K. ; Mocci , G. ; Ma , L. ; Hodonsky , C. J. ; Diez Benevante , E. ; Muhl , L. ; Liu , J. ; Gustafsson , S. ; Buyandelger , B. ; Koplev , S. ; Lendahl , U. ; Vanlandewijck , M. ; Singha , P. ; Örd , T. ; Beter , M. ; Selvarajan , I. ; Laakkonen , J. P. ; Väli , M. ; den Ruijter , H. M. ; Civelek , M. ; Hao , K. ; Ruusalepp , A. ; Betsholtz , C. ; Järve , H. ; Kovacic , J. C. ; Miller , C. L. ; Romanoski , C. ; Kaikkonen , M. U. ; Björkegren , J. L. M. , Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals sex differences in the subcellular composition and associated gene-regulatory network activity of human carotid plaques . Nat Cardiovasc Res 2025 , 4 ( 4 ), 412 – 432 . OpenUrl PubMed 10. ↵ Ilyas , I. ; Little , P. J. ; Liu , Z. ; Xu , Y. ; Kamato , D. ; Berk , B. C. ; Weng , J. ; Xu , S. , Mouse models of atherosclerosis in translational research . Trends Pharmacol Sci 2022 , 43 ( 11 ), 920 – 939 . OpenUrl CrossRef 11. ↵ Jiang , S. Y. ; Yang , X. ; Yang , Z. ; Li , J. W. ; Xu , M. Q. ; Qu , Y. X. ; Tang , J. J. ; Li , Y. F. ; Wang , L. ; Shao , Y. W. ; Meng , X. Y. ; Hu , H. ; Song , B. L. ; Rao , Y. ; Qi , W. , Discovery of an insulin-induced gene binding compound that ameliorates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by inhibiting sterol regulatory element-binding protein-mediated lipogenesis . Hepatology 2022 , 76 ( 5 ), 1466 – 1481 . OpenUrl PubMed 12. ↵ Su , M. ; Zhao , W. ; Jiang , H. ; Zhao , Y. ; Liao , Z. ; Liu , Z. ; Xu , M. ; Jiang , S. ; Wu , L. ; Yang , Y. ; Wang , Z. ; Zeng , Z. ; Fang , Y. ; Tang , C. ; Miller , C. L. ; Evans , P. C. ; Wang , L. ; Banach , M. ; Jo , H. ; Berk , B. C. ; Offermanns , S. ; Huang , Y. ; Ge , J. ; Xu , S. ; Weng , J. , Endothelial IGFBP6 suppresses vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis . Nat Cardiovasc Res 2025 , 4 ( 2 ), 145 – 162 . OpenUrl PubMed 13. ↵ Sun , L. ; Leng , R. ; Liu , M. ; Su , M. ; He , Q. ; Zhang , Z. ; Liu , Z. ; Wang , Z. ; Jiang , H. ; Wang , L. ; Guo , S. ; Xu , Y. ; Huo , Y. ; Miller , C. L. ; Banach , M. ; Huang , Y. ; Evans , P. C. ; Pelisek , J. ; Camici , G. G. ; Berk , B. C. ; Offermanns , S. ; Ge , J. ; Xu , S. ; Weng , J. , Endothelial MICU1 protects against vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis by inhibiting mitochondrial calcium uptake . J Clin Invest 2025 , 135 ( 7 ). 14. ↵ Liu , M. ; Zhang , W. ; Li , X. ; Han , J. ; Chen , Y. ; Duan , Y. , Impact of age and sex on the development of atherosclerosis and expression of the related genes in apoE deficient mice . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2016 , 469 ( 3 ), 456 – 62 . OpenUrl PubMed 15. ↵ Shin , J. ; Hong , J. ; Edwards-Glenn , J. ; Krukovets , I. ; Tkachenko , S. ; Adelus , M. L. ; Romanoski , C. E. ; Rajagopalan , S. ; Podrez , E. ; Byzova , T. V. ; Stenina-Adongravi , O. ; Cherepanova , O. A. , Unraveling the Role of Sex in Endothelial Cell Dysfunction: Evidence From Lineage Tracing Mice and Cultured Cells . Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2024 , 44 ( 1 ), 238 – 253 . OpenUrl PubMed 16. ↵ Stuttgen , G. M. ; Bobek , J. ; Penoske , R. ; Wadding-Lee , C. ; Lam , M. ; Hader , S. N. ; Owens Iii , A. P. ; Sahoo , D. , FFAR4 Deficiency Increases Necrotic Cores in Advanced Lesions of ApoE(−/−) Mice . Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2025 . 17. ↵ Wang , Q. ; Han , J. ; Liang , Z. ; Geng , X. ; Du , Y. ; Zhou , J. ; Yao , W. ; Xu , T. , FSH Is Responsible for Androgen Deprivation Therapy-Associated Atherosclerosis in Mice by Exaggerating Endothelial Inflammation and Monocyte Adhesion . Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2024 , 44 ( 3 ), 698 – 719 . OpenUrl PubMed 18. ↵ Luo , C. ; Pook , E. ; Tang , B. ; Zhang , W. ; Li , S. ; Leineweber , K. ; Cheung , S. H. ; Chen , Q. ; Bechem , M. ; Hu , J. S. ; Laux , V. ; Wang , Q. K. , Androgen inhibits key atherosclerotic processes by directly activating ADTRP transcription . Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2017 , 1863 ( 9 ), 2319 – 2332 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 19. ↵ Caligiuri , G. ; Nicoletti , A. ; Zhou , X. ; Törnberg , I. ; Hansson , G. K. , Effects of sex and age on atherosclerosis and autoimmunity in apoE-deficient mice . Atherosclerosis 1999 , 145 ( 2 ), 301 – 8 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 20. ↵ Mansukhani , N. A. ; Wang , Z. ; Shively , V. P. ; Kelly , M. E. ; Vercammen , J. M. ; Kibbe , M. R. , Sex Differences in the LDL Receptor Knockout Mouse Model of Atherosclerosis . Artery Res 2017 , 20 , 8 – 11 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted September 21, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Re-evaluating the Impact of Biological Sex on Atherosclerosis in Apoe−/− and Ldlr−/− mice Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Re-evaluating the Impact of Biological Sex on Atherosclerosis in Apoe −/− and Ldlr −/− mice Yaping Zhao , Li Wang , Bradford C. Berk , Hans Strijdom , Yu Huang , Jianping Weng , Suowen Xu bioRxiv 2025.09.19.677480; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.19.677480 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Re-evaluating the Impact of Biological Sex on Atherosclerosis in Apoe −/− and Ldlr −/− mice Yaping Zhao , Li Wang , Bradford C. Berk , Hans Strijdom , Yu Huang , Jianping Weng , Suowen Xu bioRxiv 2025.09.19.677480; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.19.677480 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Cell Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7629) Biochemistry (17661) Bioengineering (13881) Bioinformatics (41913) Biophysics (21436) Cancer Biology (18578) Cell Biology (25482) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13372) Ecology (19891) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24302) Genetics (15600) Genomics (22483) Immunology (17728) Microbiology (40365) Molecular Biology (17164) Neuroscience (88543) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2830) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4821) Physiology (7637) Plant Biology (15136) Scientific Communication and Education (2045) Synthetic Biology (4290) Systems Biology (9818) Zoology (2269)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-11T06:40:09.570059+00:00