A Data-driven Framework Combining Ahp-topsis and Rsm-based Desirability for Optimal Hybrid Composite Laminate Selection

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract This study advances the design of high-performance hybrid composites by integrating experimental characterization, multi-criteria decision-making, and statistical optimization. Epoxy-based composites reinforced with jute (J), glass (G), and carbon (C) fibers were fabricated in six distinct stacking sequences and evaluated for tensile strength, flexural strength, tensile modulus, flexural modulus, and break strain. The C5 configuration, featuring carbon fibers on the outer layers and glass fibers internally, demonstrated exceptional flexural strength (227 MPa) and tensile modulus (7.79 GPa), underscoring the critical role of fiber placement in optimizing mechanical performance. While C5 exhibited a marginal reduction in tensile strength (3.7% lower than C1), its balanced properties validated the efficacy of hybrid architectures. AHP-TOPSIS analysis ranked configurations using weighted mechanical criteria, identifying CG4C as optimal for balanced performance. To validate and refine this selection, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to model nonlinear relationships between stacking parameters and mechanical responses. High predictive accuracy (R² > 0.90 for modulus and break strain) and desirability-based optimization confirmed C5’s superiority, achieving a composite desirability score of 0.57. This work establishes a novel framework bridging decision-theoretic ranking (AHP-TOPSIS) and statistical modeling (RSM), demonstrating their synergistic utility in composite design. The methodology not only identifies optimal configurations but also quantifies trade-offs between strength, stiffness, and ductility, offering a scalable pathway for developing sustainable, application-specific hybrid composites. By validating rankings against RSM-predicted performance regions, this approach enhances confidence in material selection processes for structural and high-stiffness applications in aerospace, automotive, and construction industries.
Full text 11,975 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
A Data-driven Framework Combining Ahp-topsis and Rsm-based Desirability for Optimal Hybrid Composite Laminate Selection | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article A Data-driven Framework Combining Ahp-topsis and Rsm-based Desirability for Optimal Hybrid Composite Laminate Selection Rajesh Kumar Dewangan, Pankaj Kumar Gupta This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6790438/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This study advances the design of high-performance hybrid composites by integrating experimental characterization, multi-criteria decision-making, and statistical optimization. Epoxy-based composites reinforced with jute (J), glass (G), and carbon (C) fibers were fabricated in six distinct stacking sequences and evaluated for tensile strength, flexural strength, tensile modulus, flexural modulus, and break strain. The C5 configuration, featuring carbon fibers on the outer layers and glass fibers internally, demonstrated exceptional flexural strength (227 MPa) and tensile modulus (7.79 GPa), underscoring the critical role of fiber placement in optimizing mechanical performance. While C5 exhibited a marginal reduction in tensile strength (3.7% lower than C1), its balanced properties validated the efficacy of hybrid architectures. AHP-TOPSIS analysis ranked configurations using weighted mechanical criteria, identifying CG4C as optimal for balanced performance. To validate and refine this selection, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to model nonlinear relationships between stacking parameters and mechanical responses. High predictive accuracy (R² > 0.90 for modulus and break strain) and desirability-based optimization confirmed C5’s superiority, achieving a composite desirability score of 0.57. This work establishes a novel framework bridging decision-theoretic ranking (AHP-TOPSIS) and statistical modeling (RSM), demonstrating their synergistic utility in composite design. The methodology not only identifies optimal configurations but also quantifies trade-offs between strength, stiffness, and ductility, offering a scalable pathway for developing sustainable, application-specific hybrid composites. By validating rankings against RSM-predicted performance regions, this approach enhances confidence in material selection processes for structural and high-stiffness applications in aerospace, automotive, and construction industries. Jute-Glass-Carbon Fiber Hybrid Polymer Composite Mechanical Properties AHP-TOPSIS Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Desirability function Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6790438","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":464780300,"identity":"a433aca8-4ca5-48ca-95f5-64942117325d","order_by":0,"name":"Rajesh Kumar Dewangan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Indian Institute of Technology Bhilai","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rajesh","middleName":"Kumar","lastName":"Dewangan","suffix":""},{"id":464780301,"identity":"fc7931d2-145b-43bf-86ce-1f22a09314c6","order_by":1,"name":"Pankaj Kumar Gupta","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Pankaj","middleName":"Kumar","lastName":"Gupta","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-05-31 10:38:20","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":true,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6790438/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6790438/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":83850546,"identity":"7976fc15-426a-4020-8f2f-e85a268f8fb5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-06-03 16:01:45","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1509384,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"forspecificjournalpaper.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6790438/v1_covered_e3922280-d7b9-4ceb-ad93-58ee314d32e5.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eA Data-driven Framework Combining Ahp-topsis and Rsm-based Desirability for Optimal Hybrid Composite Laminate Selection\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Jute-Glass-Carbon Fiber, Hybrid Polymer Composite, Mechanical Properties, AHP-TOPSIS, Response Surface Methodology (RSM), Desirability function","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6790438/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6790438/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis study advances the design of high-performance hybrid composites by integrating experimental characterization, multi-criteria decision-making, and statistical optimization. Epoxy-based composites reinforced with jute (J), glass (G), and carbon (C) fibers were fabricated in six distinct stacking sequences and evaluated for tensile strength, flexural strength, tensile modulus, flexural modulus, and break strain. The C5 configuration, featuring carbon fibers on the outer layers and glass fibers internally, demonstrated exceptional flexural strength (227 MPa) and tensile modulus (7.79 GPa), underscoring the critical role of fiber placement in optimizing mechanical performance. While C5 exhibited a marginal reduction in tensile strength (3.7% lower than C1), its balanced properties validated the efficacy of hybrid architectures. AHP-TOPSIS analysis ranked configurations using weighted mechanical criteria, identifying CG4C as optimal for balanced performance. To validate and refine this selection, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to model nonlinear relationships between stacking parameters and mechanical responses. High predictive accuracy (R\u0026sup2; \u0026gt; 0.90 for modulus and break strain) and desirability-based optimization confirmed C5\u0026rsquo;s superiority, achieving a composite desirability score of 0.57. This work establishes a novel framework bridging decision-theoretic ranking (AHP-TOPSIS) and statistical modeling (RSM), demonstrating their synergistic utility in composite design. The methodology not only identifies optimal configurations but also quantifies trade-offs between strength, stiffness, and ductility, offering a scalable pathway for developing sustainable, application-specific hybrid composites. By validating rankings against RSM-predicted performance regions, this approach enhances confidence in material selection processes for structural and high-stiffness applications in aerospace, automotive, and construction industries.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"A Data-driven Framework Combining Ahp-topsis and Rsm-based Desirability for Optimal Hybrid Composite Laminate Selection","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-06-03 01:52:47","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6790438/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"00b8c6f4-daf2-4efc-b40e-12a4f4148e20","owner":[],"postedDate":"June 3rd, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-06-03T15:53:36+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-06-03 01:52:47","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6790438","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6790438","identity":"rs-6790438","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0