Prevention of ureteral damage by using ureteral illuminating catheter during laparoscopic surgery
Ureteral illuminating catheters were used during gynecological laparoscopic surgeries, clearly visualizing the ureters and aiding dissection and bleeding control with one minor, transient complication.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper investigated the usefulness and safety of ureteral illuminating catheters during gynecological laparoscopic surgery, using two patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy or laparoscopic hysterectomy. After laparoscope introduction, the catheters were reportedly clearly visualized within the ureters through the pelvic peritoneum, facilitating ureter dissection and control of periureteric bleeding. One patient experienced postoperative lumbar backache that resolved within one day, and no other complications were observed. The authors note that additional cases are needed to better assess safety. The paper’s discussion includes severe endometriosis as an example of technically challenging cases where ureter identification may be difficult, though the study is centrally about preventing ureteral damage during laparoscopic surgery.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,444 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (6)
- W2036700994 via openalex
- W2057247873 via openalex
- W2128144617 via openalex
- W2146045459 via openalex
- W4206775991 via openalex
- W4235934967 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00