Beyond Boundaries: Exploring Livability in Diverse CPTED-Enhanced Neighbourhoods of Bengaluru

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0

Abstract

As cities rapidly urbanise, poorly built infrastructure and restricted public spaces provide an impression of obscurity and vulnerability in densely populated metropolitan settings, fueling criminal activity. In response to the growing desire for cities to be safer, more livable, and sustainable, Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) is a promising option. While the influence of CPTED on crime reduction has been widely documented, further research into its impact on broader dimensions of urban livability is required. This study aims to fill this research void by undertaking an extensive comparative analysis to uncover similar trends, variances, and best practices of livability in two CPTED-enhanced neighbourhoods in Bengaluru: Malleswaram and Jayanagar. The study uses rigorous mixed-methods research to give a multidimensional understanding of the impacts of CPTED practices on urban living in the context of these two distinct neighbourhoods. The research design incorporates quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews, and comprehensive field observations to capture the varied viewpoints and nuances of individuals' lived experiences determined by common physical and social factors found to overlap between livability and CPTED such as Community Engagement, Land-use mix, Building visibility and Pedestrian infrastructure to name a few. Finally, the results support the notion that CPTED is more than just a crime-reduction approach; it is a robust tool promoting sustainable and people-centred urban landscapes. By embracing the lessons acquired from Malleswaram and Jayanagar, it is possible to work collaboratively to create cities prioritising safety, community participation, social cohesion, and overall well-being for all people. As urban surroundings adapt, integrating CPTED principles should remain essential in creating thriving and inclusive communities for future generations.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0