Evolution of Occupational Health: From Industrial Medicine to the Digital-Era

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03 · read from full text

This paper describes an evolution in occupational health, framing how industrial-era occupational medicine has changed into approaches shaped by the digital era. It is written as a broad narrative overview rather than an original study with a specific patient or worker cohort, and it emphasizes themes and transitions rather than reporting quantitative results. The material provided does not include detailed methods, population characteristics, or explicit limitations beyond the general publication metadata. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The conceptualisation of occupational health has evolved substantially over the past three centuries, transitioning from narrow industrial medicine approaches focused on physical injuries and acute health problems to broader frameworks addressing physical, mental, social, and organisational wellbeing. This article explores the historical evolution of occupational health definitions, highlighting milestones from the World Health Organisation and International Labour Organisation (WHO-ILO) Joint Committee in 1950 to the expanded 1995 definition, analysing scientific, socio-political, and economic drivers for change. The article proposes that occupational health requires a further conceptual expansion in order to address the challenges posed by digitalisation, platform-based gig work, and artificial intelligence to address algorithmic management, data rights, and non-standard employment arrangements. The article concludes with proposed recommendations on an improved framework on occupational health in the 21st century, which integrates principles of digital fairness, human oversight, and universal access to preventive services, aiming to safeguard worker health, dignity, and equity in an increasingly technology-mediated world.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0