⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04
· read from full text
ⓘ
This preprint reports an online survey of early career researchers (ECRs) who registered for the 2nd International Conference on Deprescribing (ICOD2) in Nantes, France (September 2024) to identify their research profiles, challenges, and future support strategies, including a comparison between clinician researchers and full-time researchers. The authors received 47 responses (90.4% of 52 registered ECRs), with 34 (72.3%) having at least one conference presentation. The most common challenges differed by researcher type: full-time researchers most often reported access to data and funding (each 33.3%), while clinician researchers most often reported time constraints (61.5% vs 28.6% among full-time researchers). The paper is not explicitly about endometriosis or adenomyosis; it focuses on preparing the future of deprescribing research, and it relates to endometriosis/adenomyosis only through the corpus keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
Background: The deprescribing research field is growing with the recent International Conferences on Deprescribing (ICOD). Early career researchers (ECRs) often face challenges regarding their career development. Objective: This study identified ECRs in the deprescribing field, the challenges they face, and potential strategies to support them. Methods: An online survey was sent to ECR participants who registered for ICOD2 held in Nantes, France, September 2024. The survey contained 13 questions on demographics, research focus, conference participation, and future directions. A comparison between clinician researchers and full-time researchers identified differences in the challenges they encounter. Results: We received a total of 47 (90.4%) responses from 52 participants registered as ECRs. Thirty-four (72.3%) had one or more presentations at the conference. The most common challenges identified by full-time researchers were access to data (7, 33.3%) and funding (7, 33.3%) and for clinician researchers it was time constraints (16, 61.5%), whereas only few (6, 28.6%) full time researchers reported this ( p =0.044). Conclusion: While a substantial number of ECRs participated and were engaged at all levels of ICOD2, our survey highlighted that meeting and networking are highly valued. Our findings could provide insights for the development of future ECR initiatives.
Full text
7,046 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Preparing the future of research on deprescribing: results from a survey of early career researchers at the 2nd International Conference on Deprescribing | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 3 January 2025 V1 Latest version Share on Preparing the future of research on deprescribing: results from a survey of early career researchers at the 2nd International Conference on Deprescribing Authors : Jérôme Nguyen-Soenen [email protected] , Thomas Morel 0000-0003-2141-1442 , and Kristie Weir Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173586955.53210851/v1 Published Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology Version of record Peer review timeline 339 views 156 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract Background The deprescribing research field is growing with the recent International Conferences on Deprescribing (ICOD). Early career researchers (ECRs) often face challenges regarding their career development. Objective This study identified ECRs in the deprescribing field, the challenges they face, and potential strategies to support them. Methods An online survey was sent to ECR participants who registered for ICOD2 held in Nantes, France, September 2024. The survey contained 13 questions on demographics, research focus, conference participation, and future directions. A comparison between clinician researchers and full-time researchers identified differences in the challenges they encounter. Results We received a total of 47 (90.4%) responses from 52 participants registered as ECRs. Thirty-four (72.3%) had one or more presentations at the conference. The most common challenges identified by full-time researchers were access to data (7, 33.3%) and funding (7, 33.3%) and for clinician researchers it was time constraints (16, 61.5%), whereas only few (6, 28.6%) full time researchers reported this ( p =0.044). Conclusion While a substantial number of ECRs participated and were engaged at all levels of ICOD2, our survey highlighted that meeting and networking are highly valued. Our findings could provide insights for the development of future ECR initiatives. Supplementary Material File (nguyen - manuscript.docx) Download 62.40 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 03 January 2025 Peer review timeline Published Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology Version of Record 5 May 2025 Published Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Collection Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology Authors Affiliations Jérôme Nguyen-Soenen [email protected] Nantes Universite Departement de Medecine Generale View all articles by this author Thomas Morel 0000-0003-2141-1442 Nantes Universite Departement de Medecine Generale View all articles by this author Kristie Weir The University of Sydney School of Public Health View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 339 views 156 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Jérôme Nguyen-Soenen, Thomas Morel, Kristie Weir. Preparing the future of research on deprescribing: results from a survey of early career researchers at the 2nd International Conference on Deprescribing. Authorea . 03 January 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.173586955.53210851/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.173586955.53210851/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fee1b45cf5b58d3',t:'MTc3OTMwOTEwMw=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.