The Early and Intensive Motor Training Trial for People with Spinal Cord Injuries: Description of the Intervention

The Early and Intensive Motor Training Trial for People with Spinal Cord Injuries: Description of the Intervention | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Article The Early and Intensive Motor Training Trial for People with Spinal Cord Injuries: Description of the Intervention Lisa Harvey, Marsha Ben, Joanne Glinsky, Annemie Spooren, Sharon Roberts, and 17 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2613991/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 19 Jul, 2023 Read the published version in Spinal Cord → Version 1 posted 9 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Study design: Descriptive Objectives The primary objective is to describe the intervention that will be provided in a large multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) titled: Early and Intensive Motor Training for people with Spinal Cord Injuries (the SCI-MT Trial). The secondary objective is to describe the strategies that will be used to operationalise and standardise the Motor Training provided to participants while keeping the intervention person-centred. Methods The paper focuses on the rationale and principles of Motor Training for people with spinal cord injuries (SCI). The description of the intervention is based on the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. Specifically, it addresses the following 6 criteria of the TIDieR checklist: why the effectiveness of Motor Training is being examined; what, how, where and when the Motor Training will be administered; and how much Motor Training will be provided. Results A detailed intervention manual has been developed to help standardise the delivery of the intervention. Conclusions This paper describes the details of a complex intervention administered as part of a large randomised controlled trial. It will facilitate the subsequent interpretation of the trial results and enable the intervention to be reproduced in clinical practice and future trials. Health sciences/Neurology Health sciences/Medical research Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Introduction A key aim of physiotherapy for people with recent spinal cord injuries (SCI) is to maximise neurological recovery and function. The most promising treatment for maximising recovery is Motor Training. We are using Motor Training as an umbrella term to describe a specific type of exercise program that consists of task-specific training supplemented with strength training. Motor Training is a complex intervention that needs to be individualised for each person according to their impairments, abilities, and goals. That is, there is no one specific set of Motor Training exercises that can cater for all people with SCI. Intensive Motor Training is advocated for its potential to promote recovery and improve function, particularly in those with some neurological preservation below the level of the injury and if provided soon after injury. The evidence supporting intensive Motor Training in people with recent SCI comes from animal studies and from the stroke literature [ 1 – 3 ]. However, these findings are yet to be replicated within a high-quality clinical trial. A trial called Early and Intensive Motor Training for people with Spinal Cord Injuries (The SCI-MT Trial) is currently underway. It is a multi-centre international pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 15 sites across 7 countries in Europe and Australia. Two hundred and twenty participants will be randomised to either usual care or usual care plus 10 weeks of intensive Motor Training. Patients will only be eligible if they are within 10 weeks of injury and have preservation of motor function below the level of injury. That is, people with motor function more than three levels below the motor level (for those with AIS A lesions) or with motor incomplete lesions (AIS C and AIS D) will be included in the trial. The primary outcome of the trial is neurological recovery as reflected in overall strength (measured with the Total Motor Score on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI). The secondary outcomes include other measures of neurological recovery and function. To date, 98 participants have been randomised. The protocol for the SCI-MT Trial is described elsewhere [ 4 ]. Most physiotherapists and occupational therapists are highly trained in delivering the two components of Motor Training as provided in the SCI-MT Trial, namely task-specific and strength training. However, the challenge for the SCI-MT Trial is ensuring that the trial therapists administer Motor Training in a consistent way following some key principles whilst individualising it to the needs of each person, and that the therapists deliver the intervention to the highest possible standard. The other challenge is communicating the contents of this complex intervention to the scientific community, and particularly to those without a background in physiotherapy (or occupational therapy) in accordance with the TIDieR guidelines [ 1 ]. Reporting of complex interventions is important so that the subsequent trial results can be easily interpreted and so that the intervention can be reproduced in clinical practice or future research. The TIDieR checklist provides a guide to the reporting of complex interventions [ 1 ] and underpins our description of the SCI-MT Trial intervention (see Table 1 ). The aim of this paper is to describe the details of the Motor Training intervention provided during the SCI-MT Trial. Specifically, the intervention will be described according to the following 6 criteria of the TIDieR checklist: why the effectiveness of Motor Training is being examined; what, how, where, and when the Motor Training will be administered; and how much Motor Training will be provided. The paper will address each of these criteria in two sections, namely (i) the rationale, evidence, and key principles supporting Motor Training and, (ii) operationalising and standardising the Motor Training provided as part of the SCI-MT Trial. Table 1 Intervention description of the SCI-MT trial using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. Brief Name • The Early and Intensive Motor Training for People with Spinal Cord Injuries (the SCI-MT Trial) Why • The most promising treatment for maximising recovery of function in people with recent spinal cord injuries (SCI) is Motor Training. Motor Training is a term we are using to describe task-specific training supplemented with strength training. High intensity of Motor Training directed at and below the level of injury is advocated soon after SCI, however, the effectiveness of such interventions has not been investigated with a clinical trial to date. The SCI-MT Trial has been undertaken to investigate effectiveness of early and intensive Motor Training in SCI. What materials • A training package has been developed for the SCI-MT intervention therapists. The 3-hour package (delivered via Zoom) conveys the key principles and guidelines of the intervention. • An Intervention Manual has been developed as a supplement to the training package (see Appendix). It details the key training principles of the SCI-MT Trial, information about the use of Practice Sheets, the type of equipment that can be used, and the staff who can deliver the 12 hours of Motor Training per week. The manual provides examples of exercises that can be used to deliver motor training, as well as completed Practice Sheets using four hypothetical case studies. • Practice Sheets will be used by the SCI-MT intervention therapists and participants together to set exercise targets, and to document exercise intensity, set-up, and duration. Dosage parameters documented in the Practice Sheets will be reviewed during each session, and this will be used to encourage the participants to work as hard as they can, and to progress the exercises from day to day, week to week. What procedures • Intervention therapists will review and upgrade weekly goals with the participants. The weekly goals will be related to the four baseline goals identified at the initial assessment. • Motor Training program will be individualised to the participants’ impairments, goals, and needs. The intervention therapists will prescribe exercises based on their clinical decision making whilst adhering to the key principles of the SCI-MT Trial protocol. • Practice Sheets will be used to capture exercise set-up, dosage, and intensity for every session. • SCI-MT trial staff will review Practice Sheets at every training site and provide ongoing feedback and training to the intervention therapists to ensure adherence to key principles. Who provided • The SCI-MT intervention will be delivered by a healthcare professional (e.g., Physiotherapist, Occupational Therapist, Exercise Physiologist) appropriately qualified to deliver all or some aspects of Motor Training once they have completed the compulsory training. How and Where • SCI-MT intervention will be delivered in one-to-one sessions in a therapy gym. The therapists at each site can use any equipment they deem appropriate to deliver Motor Training. Equipment such as robotics, bodyweight support treadmill training, and electrical stimulation can be used during SCI-MT sessions, as long as the key principles of Motor Training are adhered to. When and How much • The intervention participants will receive 12 hours of Motor Training in addition to usual care, for 10 weeks. • The number and duration of sessions per week is not stipulated but typically the 12 hours per week will be provided over 5 to 10 sessions of 1 to 2 hours duration each. Tailoring • The intervention will be individualised to each participant according to their impairments, abilities, and goals. Regular reassessments of participants, weekly goal setting, and meticulous documentation of the intervention details in the Practice Sheets during the 10-week period will ensure ongoing progression and tailoring of the Motor Training program for each participant. How well • The fidelity of the intervention will be examined in detail with a process evaluation that will run alongside the trial. Methods/results PART 1: RATIONALE, EVIDENCE AND KEY PRINCIPLES SUPPORTING MOTOR TRAINING IN THE SCI-MT TRIAL. The Motor Training provided during the SCI-MT Trial is directed at increasing motor function at and below the injury. This will be measured using the Total Motor Score of the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of SCI. For example, in a person with partial paralysis of the lower limbs, the Motor Training (i.e., task-specific training and strength training) will be used to improve the ability to stand or walk as well as to increase lower limb muscle strength. Of course, Motor Training as typically provided in rehabilitation can also be targeted above the injury. For example, it can be used to improve the ability of a person with paraplegia to transfer through their neurologically intact upper limbs. However, this is not the focus of the SCI-MT Trial. Rather, the focus is on improving motor function at and below the injury with the primary aim of increasing total motor scores. The Motor Training provided during the SCI-MT Trial is also directed at helping people regain the ability to move in a way that is as close as possible to that of a non-disabled person. For example, gait training will be directed at walking without aids and orthoses if possible. Similarly, upper limb training will focus on regaining the ability to reach and grasp with the kinematics and kinetics of a non-disabled person where possible. Needless to say, even small amounts of residual weakness may ultimately require some type of adaptation or compensation that alters the kinematics and kinetics of movement from that of a non-disabled person. The extent of adaptation or compensation will depend on the extent of neurological loss and may range from a slight variation to the need for extensive orthoses, aids, manual guidance, or assistance. The SCI-MT Trial intervention will be provided in a high dosage. Dosage is determined by a combination of exercise intensity, duration, and frequency. Participants in the SCI-MT Trial will be required to exercise as hard as possible (i.e., at high intensities and with a high number of movement repetitions) for 12 hours per week over 10 weeks (i.e., for a long duration and at a high frequency). There are no stipulations about the number of sessions per week but typically the 12 hours are provided over 5 to 10 sessions of 1 to 2 hours duration each. . The two components of Motor Training are described below. 1. Task-specific training Task-specific training has its origins in the motor relearning approach which was widely advocated in rehabilitation by Carr and Shepherd in the 1980s [ 2 , 3 ]. Behavioural and neurosciences have moulded its development over the years. Animal and human studies indicate that task-specific training is a strong stimulus for neuroplasticity both at the site of injury and throughout the neural pathways responsible for purposeful movement [ 4 – 6 ]. Task-specific training involves practice of movements that are specific to the desired functional outcome. The key principles of task-specific training are as follows. Repetitions Task-specific training requires repetitious practice of purposeful movements. The evidence for repetitious practice is compelling, particularly in the stroke literature [ 7 – 9 ]. Hundreds or even thousands of daily steps and upper limb movements are required to improve walking ability and arm function respectively after a stroke or SCI [ 7 , 10 , 11 ]. Nonetheless, patients undergoing rehabilitation in SCI units get very little repetitious practice [ 12 ]. This is primarily because patients do not spend the amount of time in therapy that is required for repetitious practice in addition to the many other types of interventions that they need during rehabilitation. The SCI-MT Trial aims to increase the amount of repetitious practice by adding an extra 12 hours of therapy per week for 10 weeks. Active (not passive) Task-specific training involves active voluntary muscle contractions, specific to a functional task, with the aim of learning and improving the ability to perform that task. Movement practiced in this way involves cognitive processing which is believed to drive neuroplasticity. This is supported by animal [ 13 ] and human [ 14 , 15 ] studies. Passive movements that are solely driven by the help of therapists, robotics, electrical stimulation, or other devices do not typically involve active muscle contractions and are unlikely to lead to such changes [ 16 , 17 ]. However, assistive technologies are often used in conjunction with the effort of the patient to provide a form of task-specific training. For example, locomotor training with or without body weight support (BWS) on a treadmill can be used to augment patients’ attempts at walking [ 18 , 19 ]. Similarly, upper or lower limb functional training using robotics has some features in common with task-specific training [ 17 , 20 , 21 ]. Activity Based Therapy (ABT) is another example. Although a clear definition of ABT is currently lacking [ 22 ], it typically focuses on high volumes of walking practice using various combinations of robotics and electrical stimulation [ 23 – 25 ]. A key underlying principle of the SCI-MT intervention is that only active exercises will be practiced during task-specific training although attempts at movement can be assisted by robotics, electrical stimulation, or any equipment available at the training sites and as deemed appropriate by the trial therapists. Progression Task-specific training needs to be progressed [ 26 , 27 ]. This includes progressing the difficulty of part-task and whole-task practice. Walking on a treadmill is an example of whole-task practice. As the ability to walk improves, the difficulty of the training needs to be increased, with the practice expanded to different environments with increasing task complexity resulting in increased cognitive or physical demands [ 27 ]. Part-task practice focuses on repetition of components of the desired task, with a biomechanical analysis underpinning the choice of the specific components to be practiced [ 28 ]. Part-task practice of walking may include exercises such as stepping forwards, weight shifting in standing, or even a much simpler practice of knee and hip extension on a sliding tilt table (see www.physiotherapyexercises.com for over 1,500 exercises which include whole-task and part-task practice). Like whole-task practice, part-task practice also needs to be progressed and relies on reassembling the components back to the whole-task once the person is ready to do so [ 8 ]. The ongoing progression of task-specific practice is required to the point where the ability to perform the task becomes an automatic skill [ 29 ]. The progression of task-specific training is critical to the SCI-MT Trial and can be done in many ways. Examples of progression include increasing the number of repetitions, changing the environmental set-up to increase the challenge, or manipulating the difficulty of the task. Physiotherapists typically select new or additional exercises every few days or weeks and constantly modify existing exercises to ensure the training is challenging and progressed. Exercise selection is highly reliant on the therapists’ ongoing analysis of patients’ attempts at movement, as well as therapists’ decision making and clinical expertise. Appropriate progression is also reliant on careful and detailed recording of what a person does today in order to ensure they do more tomorrow. For this reason, Practice Sheets will be used for all training sessions in the SCI-MT Trial (see Fig. 1 for an example), where features of the exercise reflecting the intensity, set-up, and amount of practice will be recorded. For example, if a person repeatedly practices sit to stand, the following details may be recorded to direct the future progression: the height of the chair, the number of repetitions of sit to stand, the position of the feet in relation to the base of the chair, the amount of weight put through each foot, the time taken to complete a set number of repetitions, or some subjective measure of exertion such as the Borg Scale of perceived exertion. Another important aspect of the SCI-MT Trial intervention is target orientated instructions. This helps ensure training is progressed. So, prior to commencement of any exercise the therapist and participant will together reflect on what was done in the previous session and set a new exercise target for the current session. For example, if a person could do 40 repetitions of sit to stand from a set height yesterday then perhaps today’s target will be to complete 44 repetitions from the same height. Alternatively, if a person can slide his or her thumb 40mm along a ruler whilst working towards the goal of getting the hand around a cup, perhaps next time the aim will be to slide the thumb to 42mms (see Fig. 2 ). The setting of targets for every exercise makes it very clear to participants what they are trying to achieve. It provides motivation and it enables the therapist and participant to see improvement even if very small. It also ensures that training is progressed. However, it requires meticulous measuring and recording on Practice Sheets: an important aspect of the SCI-MT Trial. Feedback Appropriate and timely feedback is integral to skill acquisition [ 30 ]. Feedback provides the person with important information about their attempts at movement. It is critical for helping the person change future attempts at movement and is central to optimal motor learning. Feedback provided by therapists is known as augmented feedback. Augmented feedback is particularly important for people with SCI because of their sensory-motor impairments. Augmented feedback can be provided in the form of knowledge of results (KR) and knowledge of performance (KP) [ 26 , 27 ]. Knowledge of results refers to information about the outcomes of attempts at movement. Examples of KR feedback include information about the accuracy of stepping onto a target, the speed of walking or the number of sit-to-stand exercises completed. In contrast, KP refers to information about the quality of movement, or the kinetics and kinematics. Examples of KP include feedback about how well a person straightens his or her knee when standing or what a person does not do when trying to shift weight from one leg to another. Evidence suggests that both KR and KP are important for optimising motor learning during task-specific training [ 31 – 33 ]. Both types of feedback need to be provided at an appropriate time and in an appropriate amount of detail that matches the person’s stage of learning. So too much feedback can be just as detrimental to learning as too little feedback. Similarly, feedback provided at the wrong time can hinder attempts at movement. Therefore, an important aspect of the Motor Training provided as part of the SCI-MT Trial will be well-timed and appropriate KR and KP feedback. The use of Practice Sheets in which the therapists and participants set and review exercise targets and goals will encourage the provision of KR feedback. Goal driven Task-specific training must be meaningful to the person. That is, it must be based on his or her own goals [ 34 ]. Setting meaningful goals can increase a person’s satisfaction with the intervention and improve motivation to engage in therapy. It can also ensure that the training is specific [ 35 ]. Motor Training based on goals that are specific and difficult is likely to produce better outcomes than training without a goal or with a non-specific easily attained goal [ 27 ]. The SMART acronym is often used to facilitate the goal-setting process, prompting therapists to set goals with patients that are Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Timebound (there are several variations of the words associated with each letter) [ 36 , 37 ]. Task-specific training as part of the SCI-MT Trial will be based on goals set by participants in collaboration with the therapists. Two ten-week and two six-month goals will be set during the baseline assessments that form part of the formal assessment schedule of the trial. These will be set using the SMART principles of goal setting. The goals will be related to participants’ activity limitations and participation restrictions and be amenable to SCI-MT intervention. Then, each week during the SCI-MT training, the therapist and participant will together identify up to four smaller goals just for the week. These weekly goals will be reviewed and progressed and will underpin the choice of task-specific exercises included in the Motor Training program. 2. Strength Training Strength training is the second component of Motor Training. Whilst it is an important aspect of SCI-MT Trial, strength training is considered supplementary, with the priority being given to task-specific training. There is strong evidence about the effectiveness of strength training in muscles with grade 3 or more strength [ 38 , 39 ]. This evidence points to the importance of progressive resistance training involving high loads and low repetitions. This typically involves 2–4 sets of 6–12 repetition maximum muscle contractions, performed two-three times per week, over eight weeks with progression as muscles increase in strength [ 38 , 39 ]. The most effective way to strengthen very weak muscles (grade 1 and 2) is less clear although progressive resistance training is not a viable option because it is very difficult to operationalise (high load and low repetitions). By necessity therefore, therapists tend to administer strength training for very weak muscles in the form of low loads and high repetitions. This type of training usually involves repeated contractions of the very weak muscle through the available joint range of motion to the point of muscle fatigue. Progress is achieved by changing the position of the limb and manipulating the effects of gravity and surface friction until the person can train against gravity, and then against resistance. The evidence about the effectiveness of this form of strength training for the very weak is inconclusive [ 40 ] but included as part of the SCI-MT intervention because it is widely administered and may be effective when combined with task-specific training. Of course, the distinction between strength training and task-specific training for the very weak can become blurred once the focus of an exercise involves high numbers of repetitious contractions. For example, knee and hip extension exercises completed on a sliding tilt table can be considered a form of strength training but can also be a form of part-task training aimed towards improving the ability to perform sit-to-stand. For the purpose of this trial, the distinction between the two is based on whether the repetitious practice involves complex movements in the context of purposeful activity or simpler exercises targeting strength training of a specific muscle group. The key features of the strength training provided as part of the Motor Training of the SCI-MT Trial are: Progression The strength training for muscles of grade 3 and 4 strength will follow the principles of progressive resistance training (high load and low repetitions), whilst the strength training for muscles of grade 1 and 2 strength will follow the principles of low load and high repetitions training. Both types of strength training will be progressed, and the participants will be encouraged to work to fatigue in every session with the difficulty of exercises increased as required. For very weak muscles, strength training will be transitioned to higher loads with lower repetitions, as well to task-specific training, as soon as possible. Goal driven with feedback Like task-specific training, strength training needs to be meaningful to the person and based on goals that are set at the beginning of each week. In addition, setting clear targets for each exercise, so that the participants know exactly what they are trying to achieve is an important aspect of strength training. The participants will be provided with KR feedback (e.g., information about the numbers of repetitions and amount of load completed with each exercise) to optimise the effectiveness of the training. Part 2: Operationalising And Standardising The Motor Training Provided As Part Of The Sci-mt Trial Whilst Motor Training will be individualised to the needs of each participant, it is important that the intervention is standardised within the SCI-MT Trial as far as possible, with trial therapists adhering to the key training principles. This is being achieved by articulating the key principles and guidelines of the SCI-MT in a 3-hour online training package (delivered via Zoom) to all trial therapists. The training is compulsory and is provided to every SCI-MT site. The key principles of SCI-MT Trial are summarised in Table 2 . Table 2 A summary of the key principles of SCI-MT intervention General SCI-MT principles Task-specific training Strength training For muscles with Grade 1 and 2 strength For muscle with Grade 3 and 4 strength • Twelve hours of weekly therapy will be delivered in one-to-one sessions in the therapy gym for 10 weeks. • The number and duration of sessions per week is not stipulated but typically the 12 hours per week will be provided over 5 to 10 sessions of 1 to 2 hours duration each. • Therapy will target the Total Motor Score, secondary outcomes, and the participants’ goals • Practice Sheets will be used for every session • Exercise targets will be set for each exercise during each therapy session • Therapy will be progressed as much as possible. • Participants will be challenged to work as hard as possible in every session. • Each session will be spent with the participant actively engaged in exercise. • The participants will be re-assessed regularly throughout the 10 weeks. • Focus on high numbers of repetitions • Include part-task or whole-task practice • Provide manual assistance only if essential • Feedback will be used to provide knowledge of performance and knowledge of results • Clear instructions and demonstrations will be provided • Treadmills or robotics will be used to complement training when and if appropriate • The focus will be on high repetitions and low load • Effects of gravity and surface friction will be manipulated to enable active muscle contraction • Resistance/load will be increased as soon as possible • The strength training will be done within the context of a functional activity if possible • Manual assistance will only be provided if essential • Training will follow the principles of progressive resistance training (ie., 3 x 10-12RM) • The strength training will be done within the context of a functional activity if possible In addition, an Intervention Manual is provided to all trial therapists alongside the training package (see Appendix 1 for a copy of the intervention manual). The Intervention Manual details the training principles of the SCI-MT Trial as well as information about the use of Practice Sheets, the type of equipment that can be used, and the staff who can deliver the 12 hours of Motor Training per week. Examples of Motor Training exercises are presented in the Intervention Manual and are categorised into common activities that can be targeted by Motor Training. The manual also includes completed Practice Sheets using four different hypothetical case studies. These demonstrate ways in which exercise set-up, intensity of training, and time spent on each exercise across a week can be documented. The SCI-MT intervention will be delivered by a healthcare professional (e.g., Physiotherapist, Occupational Therapist, Exercise Physiologist) appropriately qualified to deliver all or some aspects of Motor Training once they have completed the compulsory training. The 12 hours per week of Motor Training will be provided to the intervention participants on a one-to-one basis by the therapists in a therapy gym. The time allocated to Motor Training will be dedicated to as much active exercise as possible, although it will also include rest, set-up, and chat. Management of fatigue will include rests as required, with encouragement to resume exercise as soon as possible. Mental practice [ 41 ] can be used as an adjunct to training if a participant gets excessively fatigued. The use of Practice Sheets will be at the core of delivering the SCI-MT intervention. Therapists and participants will refer to the Practice Sheets together at the beginning of each week to review previously set goals and negotiate 2–4 new goals. Therapists will also use Practice Sheets to set exercise targets, and to document exercise intensity, set-up, and duration within each session. Dosage parameters documented in the Practice Sheets will be reviewed during each session, and this will be used to encourage the participants to work as hard as they can, and to progress the exercises from day to day, and week to week. The exercise dosage delivered during the 12 hours of weekly SCI-MT Trial intervention will be documented as the amount of time dedicated to active practice during each therapy session. Time alone will not capture all aspects of intensity or dosage, but it will be used in the SCI-MT Trial as a crude measure of intensity that is practical to capture. This is consistent with other studies in stroke and SCI rehabilitation [ 42 – 44 ]. Amount of time spent on motor training during every SCI-MT session will be documented in Case Report Forms (CRF). Furthermore, time spent on each individual exercise (in addition to other training parameters reflecting intensity of training) will be recorded in the Practice Sheets, which together with the CRFs, will reflect the intensity of the SCI-MT training program. Importantly, there will be ongoing auditing of the intervention by three trial clinical experts to ensure that the intervention is being delivered as intended. The audits will involve regular reviews of the Practice Sheets at each site, with provision of feedback and ongoing training of the trial therapists as required. In addition, the fidelity of the intervention will be examined in detail with a process evaluation that will run alongside the trial. Discussion The SCI-MT Trial when completed will be one of the largest physiotherapy intervention trials yet to be conducted in the area of SCI. The trial addresses an important question. That is, does intensive Motor Training provided soon after injury promote neurological recovery and improve function? The results of this trial will provide the much-needed evidence for this promising intervention. The description of the intervention is provided in as much detail at possible but one short paper can never substitute for undergraduate, postgraduate, and clinical training in the physiotherapy (and occupational therapy) management of people with SCI. There are many assumed skills that underpin the intervention. Of course, some would argue that this is a weakness of the trial. We however argue that the trial is pragmatic and needs to test the effectiveness of an intervention as it would typically be administered in the clinical setting [ 45 ]. It therefore needs to allow for a clinician’s clinical reasoning skills. It also needs to accommodate the many different ways people are affected by SCI and their individual goals and problems. Nonetheless great effort is being directed at ensuring that those administering the intervention are appropriately skilled and trained. There is a risk that people with recent SCI will not tolerate 12 hours of additional therapy each week so soon after injury, or they will not receive this amount of therapy for other unforeseen reasons. This will all be closely recorded and monitored. All participants will be encouraged, but not obliged, to attend therapy and some participants will no doubt opt out. Issues like this will not nullify the results or be fatal flaws because the trial is pragmatic, not explanatory [ 45 ]. It is asking about the outcomes if we set in place staffing, policies and structures so that the spinal units can provide the maximal amount of therapy that is conceivably possible. The participants’ abilities and willingness to receive this additional therapy is all part of the construct that is being tested. It is part of the real-world scenario. In all, this paper provides the details of the Motor Training provided as part of the SCI-MT Trial. The details will increase transparency and help interpret the future results of the trial. This paper may also help those not trained in physiotherapy to appreciate some of the nuances of providing task-specific training to people with SCI. And while repetitious practice of purposeful movements is central to task-specific training, there are many other important principles that must also be followed. Declarations DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: This paper does not contain data. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: We thank all the people with spinal cord injuries that have given their time to participate in the study to date. We also thank the many staff involved in the study for their enthusiasm, dedication, and collaboration with the delivery of the SCI MT trial intervention. AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTION: Secured funding: LAH, JVG, VJ, CS Overall trial design: LAH, JVG, MB, CS Intervention development: LAH, JVG, MB, JC, KT Site management: AS, SR, LWC, SD, ML, EJG, JA, CVL, CL, JMS, CB, SP, DR, KO Development of the intervention manual: MB, JC, KT, LAH, JVG Writing of the first draft of the manuscript: MB, LAH, JVG, JI Read draft of paper: MB, LAH, JVG, AS, SR, LWC, SD, ML, VJ, EG, JA, CVL, CL, JMS, CB, SP, DR, JC, KT, JI, KO, CS Final edits of the manuscript: MB, LAH, JVG, AS, KT, JC, SR, ML, CL, CS FUNDING: The trial is investigator initiated. It is funded by a 5-year grant from NSW Ministry of Health and a 4-year grant from Wings for Life Foundation with additional financial support from the University of Sydney. ETHICAL APPROVAL: No ethical approvals were required for this descriptive paper. COMPETING INTERESTS: There are no competing interests to declare. References Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 2014; doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. A motor learning model for stroke rehabilitation. Physiotherapy 1989; 75:372-380. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. A motor relearning programme for stroke , Second edition, US edition. Heinemann Medical Books: Oxford, 1990. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 1996; 16:785-807. Kleim JA, Barbay S, Nudo RJ. Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol 1998; 80:3321-3325. Ilha J, Meireles A, de Freitas GR, do Espírito Santo CC, Machado-Pereira NAMM, Swarowsky A et al. Overground gait training promotes functional recovery and cortical neuroplasticity in an incomplete spinal cord injury model. Life Sciences 2019; 232:116627-116627. French B, Thomas LH, Coupe J, McMahon NE, Connell L, Harrison J et al. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane library 2016; doi:10.1002/14651858.CD14006073.pub14651853. Valkenborghs SR, Callister R, Visser MM, Nilsson M, van Vliet P. Interventions combined with task-specific training to improve upper limb motor recovery following stroke: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Phys Ther Rev 2019; 24:100-117. Klassen TD, Dukelow SP, Bayley MT, Benavente O, Hill MD, Krassioukov A et al. Higher doses improve walking recovery during stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Stroke 2020; 51:2639-2648. Lang CE, Strube MJ, Bland MD, Waddell KJ, Cherry-Allen KM, Nudo RJ et al. Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Neurol 2016; 80:342-354. Basso DM, Lang CE. Consideration of dose and timing when applying interventions after stroke and spinal cord injury. J Neurol Phys Ther 2017; 41 Suppl 3 Supplement, IV STEP Spec Iss:S24-S31. Zbogar D, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Krassioukov AV, Verrier MC. Movement repetitions in physical and occupational therapy during spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Spinal cord 2017; 55:172-179. Plautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: Role of use versus learning. Neurobiology of learning and memory 2000; 74:27-55. Leech KA, Roemmich RT, Gordon J, Reisman DS, Cherry-Allen KM. Updates in motor learning: Implications for physical therapist practice and education. Physical therapy 2022; 102:1-9. Beets IAM, Macé M, Meesen RLJ, Cuypers K, Levin O, Swinnen SP. Active versus passive training of a complex bimanual task: Is prescriptive proprioceptive information sufficient for inducing motor learning? PloS one 2012; 7:e37687-e37687. Field-Fote EC, Roach KE. Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. Physical therapy 2011; 91:48-60. Spiess MR, Steenbrink F, Esquenazi A. Getting the best out of advanced rehabilitation technology for the lower limbs: minding motor learning principles. PM & R 2018; 10:S165-S173. Alexeeva N, Sames C, Jacobs PL, Hobday L, DiStasio MM, Mitchell SA et al. Comparison of training methods to improve walking in persons with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Spinal Cord Med 2011; 34:362-379. Brazg G, Fahey M, Holleran CL, Connolly M, Woodward J, Hennessy PW et al. Effects of training intensity on locomotor performance in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized crossover study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31:944-954. Alcobendas-Maestro M, Esclarín-Ruz A, Casado-López RM, Muñoz-González A, Pérez-Mateos G, González-Valdizán E et al. Lokomat robotic-assisted versus overground training within 3 to 6 months of incomplete spinal cord lesion: randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 26:1058-1063. Esclarín-Ruz A, Alcobendas-Maestro M, Casado-Lopez R, Perez-Mateos G, Florido-Sanchez MA, Gonzalez-Valdizan E et al. A comparison of robotic walking therapy and conventional walking therapy in individuals with upper versus lower motor neuron lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95:1023-1031. Kaiser A, Chan K, Pakosh M, Musselman KE. Characteristics of activity-based therapy interventions for people living with spinal cord injury or disease across the continuum of care: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040014. Dromerick AW, Lum PS, Hidler J. Activity-based therapies. NeuroRx 2006; 3:428-438. Jones ML, Harness E, Denison P, Tefertiller C, Evans N, Larson CA. Activity-based therapies in spinal cord injury: clinical focus and empirical evidence in three independent programs. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2012; 18:34-42. Behrman AL, Harkema SJ. Physical rehabilitation as an agent for recovery after spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2007; 18:183-202. Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, Carey LM. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup Ther Int 2009; 16:175-189. Maier M, Ballester BR, Verschure PFMJ. Principles of neurorehabilitation after stroke based on motor learning and brain plasticity mechanisms. Front Syst Neurosci 2019; 13:doi:10.3389/fnsys.2019.00074. Scrivener K, Shepherd R. The importance of kinesiology, biomechanics and motor learning for movement analysis and clinical reasoning in neuromuscular physiotherapy. Phys Ther Rev 2022; doi:10.1080/10833196.10832022.12141529. Winstein C, Lewthwaite R, Blanton SR, Wolf LB, Wishart L. Infusing motor learning research into neurorehabilitation practice: A historical perspective with case exemplar from the accelerated skill acquisition program. J Neurol Phys Ther 2014; 38:190-200. Magill RA, Anderson DI. Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications , Twelfth edition. McGraw-Hill Education LLC: New York, N.Y, 2021. Cirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF. Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37:1237-1242. Jie LJ, Kleynen M, Meijer K, Beurskens A, Braun S. Implicit and explicit motor learning interventions have similar effects on walking speed in people after Stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Physical therapy 2021; 101:1-10. Oppici L, Dix A, Narciss S. When is knowledge of performance (KP) superior to knowledge of results (KR) in promoting motor skill learning? A systematic review. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol 2021; doi:10.1080/1750984X.1752021.1986849. Spooren AIF, Janssen-Potten YJM, Kerckhofs E, Bongers HMH, Seelen HAM. ToCUEST: a task-oriented client-centered training module to improve upper extremity skilled performance in cervical spinal cord-injured persons. Spinal cord 2011; 49:1042-1048. Levack WMM, Weatherall M, Hay‐Smith EJC, Dean SG, McPherson K, Siegert RJ et al. Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit for adults with acquired disability participating in rehabilitation. Cochrane library 2015; doi:10.1002/14651858.CD14009727.pub14651852. Wade DT. Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23:291-295. Swann C, Jackman PC, Lawrence A, Hawkins RM, Goddard SG, Williamson O et al. The (over)use of SMART goals for physical activity promotion: A narrative review and critique. Health Psychol Rev 2022; doi:10.1080/17437199.17432021.12023608. Bye EA, Harvey LA, Gambhir A, Kataria C, Glinsky JV, Bowden JL et al. Strength training for partially paralysed muscles in people with recent spinal cord injury: a within-participant randomised controlled trial. Spinal cord 2017; 55:460-465. Harvey L, Fornusek C, Bowden JL, Pontifex N, Glinsky J, Middleton JW et al. Electrical stimulation plus progressive resistance training for leg strength in spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial. Spinal cord 2010; 48:570-575. Chen LW, Glinsky JV, Islam MS, Hossain M, Boswell-Ruys CL, Kataria C et al. The effects of 10,000 voluntary contractions over 8 weeks on the strength of very weak muscles in people with spinal cord injury: a randomised controlled trial. Spinal cord 2020; 58:857-864. Stockley RC, Jarvis K, Boland P, Clegg AJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mental practice for the upper limb after stroke: imagined or real benefit? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 102:1011-1027. Schneider EJ, Lannin NA, Ada L, Schmidt J. Increasing the amount of usual rehabilitation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother 2016; 62:182-187. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: Issues for consideration. Disability and rehabilitation 2006; 28:823-830. Jones ML, Evans NM, Tefertiller C, Backus D, Sweatman M, Tansey K et al. Activity-based therapy for recovery of walking in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: results from a randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95:2239-2246. Treweek S, Zwarenstein M. Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability. Trials 2009; 10:37. Additional Declarations There is no duality of interest Supplementary Files Bensupplementalfileinterventionmanual.pdf Supplementary file 1: Early and Intensive Motor Training for people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI MT) - Intervention Manual Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 19 Jul, 2023 Read the published version in Spinal Cord → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: revise 24 Mar, 2023 Review # 2 received at journal 22 Mar, 2023 Reviewer # 2 agreed at journal 01 Mar, 2023 Review # 1 received at journal 25 Feb, 2023 Reviewer # 1 agreed at journal 22 Feb, 2023 Reviewers invited by journal 22 Feb, 2023 Submission checks completed at journal 22 Feb, 2023 First submitted to journal 21 Feb, 2023 Editor assigned by journal 21 Feb, 2023 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-2613991","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":178183863,"identity":"c04f5fc3-627f-4512-9858-66f61798bf47","order_by":0,"name":"Lisa Harvey","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4365-0236","institution":"University of Sydney","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lisa","middleName":"","lastName":"Harvey","suffix":""},{"id":178183864,"identity":"32e14788-c53f-4560-a82b-3f6d1849e7d1","order_by":1,"name":"Marsha Ben","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Marsha","middleName":"","lastName":"Ben","suffix":""},{"id":178183865,"identity":"048f5352-d2c1-42b0-8db2-6fc8854921fc","order_by":2,"name":"Joanne Glinsky","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sydney","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Joanne","middleName":"","lastName":"Glinsky","suffix":""},{"id":178183866,"identity":"b13f9633-80a4-4734-853e-89180ca2f03e","order_by":3,"name":"Annemie Spooren","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Hasselt, Belgium","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Annemie","middleName":"","lastName":"Spooren","suffix":""},{"id":178183867,"identity":"13bbcea7-4656-410a-82eb-8f51f3d5d8b5","order_by":4,"name":"Sharon Roberts","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sharon","middleName":"","lastName":"Roberts","suffix":""},{"id":178183868,"identity":"2ede04f1-be28-4472-91e0-d06e3bf0fad9","order_by":5,"name":"Lydia Chen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"NSW Health","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lydia","middleName":"","lastName":"Chen","suffix":""},{"id":178183869,"identity":"4bbcc62c-9990-430a-88a0-b51c44589f5d","order_by":6,"name":"Sophia Denis","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sophia","middleName":"","lastName":"Denis","suffix":""},{"id":178183870,"identity":"fe4f69ca-64d6-4548-b393-0a41432145b6","order_by":7,"name":"Matteo Lorusso","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Matteo","middleName":"","lastName":"Lorusso","suffix":""},{"id":178183871,"identity":"888fa073-3a21-4c17-9b8a-6bf7e6b45df4","order_by":8,"name":"Vivien Jørgensen","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9437-7009","institution":"Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Vivien","middleName":"","lastName":"Jørgensen","suffix":""},{"id":178183872,"identity":"0c51509f-be59-4c26-99fd-9aff1fa094bd","order_by":9,"name":"Emilie Gollan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Princess Alexandra Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Emilie","middleName":"","lastName":"Gollan","suffix":""},{"id":178183873,"identity":"05a2a6dd-1e19-4821-8b1e-95d2508a781f","order_by":10,"name":"Jacqui Agostinello","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jacqui","middleName":"","lastName":"Agostinello","suffix":""},{"id":178183874,"identity":"0dee7b9a-a600-4ed2-bb31-df15c5b32ff0","order_by":11,"name":"Charlotte van Laake-Geelen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Charlotte","middleName":"van","lastName":"Laake-Geelen","suffix":""},{"id":178183875,"identity":"2401ed24-f94f-456a-b040-b42d74aa5f16","order_by":12,"name":"Claire Lincoln","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Claire","middleName":"","lastName":"Lincoln","suffix":""},{"id":178183876,"identity":"1ce53c5d-d26d-4e03-b147-d9aacde6d5e8","order_by":13,"name":"Janneke Stolwijk-Swüste","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6793-691X","institution":"De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Janneke","middleName":"","lastName":"Stolwijk-Swüste","suffix":""},{"id":178183877,"identity":"ba63a195-a28d-432a-a81b-1b93af7feea7","order_by":14,"name":"Chris Bell","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Chris","middleName":"","lastName":"Bell","suffix":""},{"id":178183878,"identity":"b7fbf3e1-908f-441a-b418-0af78936ce49","order_by":15,"name":"Sue Paddison","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Sue","middleName":"","lastName":"Paddison","suffix":""},{"id":178183879,"identity":"3f27e591-6c28-434d-bd21-86b5a72b306a","order_by":16,"name":"Donna Rainey","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Royal Rehab","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Donna","middleName":"","lastName":"Rainey","suffix":""},{"id":178183880,"identity":"6db72530-bbf6-49c4-b226-3f7f3c239914","order_by":17,"name":"Jackie Chu","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5810-2788","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jackie","middleName":"","lastName":"Chu","suffix":""},{"id":178183881,"identity":"ec27dc33-161e-4de9-ba58-8fd3a7ffe765","order_by":18,"name":"Keira Tranter","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Keira","middleName":"","lastName":"Tranter","suffix":""},{"id":178183882,"identity":"3c6ae154-7da1-4cbd-b6dc-d53b5b29be36","order_by":19,"name":"Jocemar Ilha","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6300-4696","institution":"Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jocemar","middleName":"","lastName":"Ilha","suffix":""},{"id":178183883,"identity":"babf3d4c-21dc-49b0-9e7f-a1f08120c8dc","order_by":20,"name":"Kristine Oostra","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kristine","middleName":"","lastName":"Oostra","suffix":""},{"id":178183884,"identity":"59328d5c-1855-4dba-9c93-4fe58c473ab6","order_by":21,"name":"Cathie Sherrington","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Sydney","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Cathie","middleName":"","lastName":"Sherrington","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2023-02-22 00:46:28","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2613991/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2613991/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00911-4","type":"published","date":"2023-07-19T04:00:00+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":33419581,"identity":"5529d70f-5c42-4b2d-84cc-4fb1d6971b66","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-02-24 18:23:55","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":183278,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAbbreviations: PT = physiotherapist; BWS = body weight support; UL = upper limbs; BORG \u0026nbsp;= Borg Rating Scale of Perceived Exertion.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2613991/v1/936e5058d13d20f6cc075f4f.png"},{"id":33419582,"identity":"a52ce7f7-c982-45fb-8981-90e3dd2a31fb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-02-24 18:23:55","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":120653,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eExamples of exercise set-up with target orientated instructions.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2613991/v1/6de8b059e38e4c8c28410944.png"},{"id":40357561,"identity":"7ff8996b-66b3-450a-8631-8f240fb5f241","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-07-21 07:33:37","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":773679,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2613991/v1/200b74d6-0a7c-4af0-981b-1f62a95fcce0.pdf"},{"id":33419583,"identity":"96447813-a659-44cb-ac19-cd21af91fc88","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2023-02-24 18:23:55","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":6308892,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary file 1: Early and Intensive Motor Training for people with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI MT) - Intervention Manual","description":"","filename":"Bensupplementalfileinterventionmanual.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-2613991/v1/7dfacc5bd00180b9a885bd27.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"There is no duality of interest","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eThe Early and Intensive Motor Training Trial for People with Spinal Cord Injuries: Description of the Intervention\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eA key aim of physiotherapy for people with recent spinal cord injuries (SCI) is to maximise neurological recovery and function. The most promising treatment for maximising recovery is Motor Training. We are using \u003cem\u003eMotor Training\u003c/em\u003e as an umbrella term to describe a specific type of exercise program that consists of task-specific training supplemented with strength training. Motor Training is a complex intervention that needs to be individualised for each person according to their impairments, abilities, and goals. That is, there is no one specific set of Motor Training exercises that can cater for all people with SCI.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntensive Motor Training is advocated for its potential to promote recovery and improve function, particularly in those with some neurological preservation below the level of the injury and if provided soon after injury. The evidence supporting intensive Motor Training in people with recent SCI comes from animal studies and from the stroke literature [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR2\" citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. However, these findings are yet to be replicated within a high-quality clinical trial. A trial called \u003cem\u003eEarly and Intensive Motor Training for people with Spinal Cord Injuries\u003c/em\u003e (The SCI-MT Trial) is currently underway. It is a multi-centre international pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 15 sites across 7 countries in Europe and Australia. Two hundred and twenty participants will be randomised to either usual care or usual care plus 10 weeks of intensive Motor Training. Patients will only be eligible if they are within 10 weeks of injury and have preservation of motor function below the level of injury. That is, people with motor function more than three levels below the motor level (for those with AIS A lesions) or with motor incomplete lesions (AIS C and AIS D) will be included in the trial. The primary outcome of the trial is neurological recovery as reflected in overall strength (measured with the Total Motor Score on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI). The secondary outcomes include other measures of neurological recovery and function. To date, 98 participants have been randomised. The protocol for the SCI-MT Trial is described elsewhere [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMost physiotherapists and occupational therapists are highly trained in delivering the two components of Motor Training as provided in the SCI-MT Trial, namely task-specific and strength training. However, the challenge for the SCI-MT Trial is ensuring that the trial therapists administer Motor Training in a consistent way following some key principles whilst individualising it to the needs of each person, and that the therapists deliver the intervention to the highest possible standard. The other challenge is communicating the contents of this complex intervention to the scientific community, and particularly to those without a background in physiotherapy (or occupational therapy) in accordance with the TIDieR guidelines [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. Reporting of complex interventions is important so that the subsequent trial results can be easily interpreted and so that the intervention can be reproduced in clinical practice or future research. The TIDieR checklist provides a guide to the reporting of complex interventions [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e] and underpins our description of the SCI-MT Trial intervention (see Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The aim of this paper is to describe the details of the Motor Training intervention provided during the SCI-MT Trial. Specifically, the intervention will be described according to the following 6 criteria of the TIDieR checklist: why the effectiveness of Motor Training is being examined; what, how, where, and when the Motor Training will be administered; and how much Motor Training will be provided. The paper will address each of these criteria in two sections, namely (i) the rationale, evidence, and key principles supporting Motor Training and, (ii) operationalising and standardising the Motor Training provided as part of the SCI-MT Trial.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntervention description of the SCI-MT trial using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBrief Name\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; The Early and Intensive Motor Training for People with Spinal Cord Injuries (the SCI-MT Trial)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; The most promising treatment for maximising recovery of function in people with recent spinal cord injuries (SCI) is Motor Training. Motor Training is a term we are using to describe task-specific training supplemented with strength training. High intensity of Motor Training directed at and below the level of injury is advocated soon after SCI, however, the effectiveness of such interventions has not been investigated with a clinical trial to date. The SCI-MT Trial has been undertaken to investigate effectiveness of early and intensive Motor Training in SCI.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat materials\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; A training package has been developed for the SCI-MT intervention therapists. The 3-hour package (delivered via Zoom) conveys the key principles and guidelines of the intervention.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; An Intervention Manual has been developed as a supplement to the training package (see Appendix). It details the key training principles of the SCI-MT Trial, information about the use of Practice Sheets, the type of equipment that can be used, and the staff who can deliver the 12 hours of Motor Training per week. The manual provides examples of exercises that can be used to deliver motor training, as well as completed Practice Sheets using four hypothetical case studies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Practice Sheets will be used by the SCI-MT intervention therapists and participants together to set exercise targets, and to document exercise intensity, set-up, and duration. Dosage parameters documented in the Practice Sheets will be reviewed during each session, and this will be used to encourage the participants to work as hard as they can, and to progress the exercises from day to day, week to week.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat procedures\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Intervention therapists will review and upgrade weekly goals with the participants. The weekly goals will be related to the four baseline goals identified at the initial assessment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Motor Training program will be individualised to the participants\u0026rsquo; impairments, goals, and needs. The intervention therapists will prescribe exercises based on their clinical decision making whilst adhering to the key principles of the SCI-MT Trial protocol.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Practice Sheets will be used to capture exercise set-up, dosage, and intensity for every session.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; SCI-MT trial staff will review Practice Sheets at every training site and provide ongoing feedback and training to the intervention therapists to ensure adherence to key principles.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWho provided\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; The SCI-MT intervention will be delivered by a healthcare professional (e.g., Physiotherapist, Occupational Therapist, Exercise Physiologist) appropriately qualified to deliver all or some aspects of Motor Training once they have completed the compulsory training.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow and Where\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; SCI-MT intervention will be delivered in one-to-one sessions in a therapy gym. The therapists at each site can use any equipment they deem appropriate to deliver Motor Training. Equipment such as robotics, bodyweight support treadmill training, and electrical stimulation can be used during SCI-MT sessions, as long as the key principles of Motor Training are adhered to.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhen and How much\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; The intervention participants will receive 12 hours of Motor Training in addition to usual care, for 10 weeks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; The number and duration of sessions per week is not stipulated but typically the 12 hours per week will be provided over 5 to 10 sessions of 1 to 2 hours duration each.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTailoring\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; The intervention will be individualised to each participant according to their impairments, abilities, and goals. Regular reassessments of participants, weekly goal setting, and meticulous documentation of the intervention details in the Practice Sheets during the 10-week period will ensure ongoing progression and tailoring of the Motor Training program for each participant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHow well\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; The fidelity of the intervention will be examined in detail with a process evaluation that will run alongside the trial.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods/results","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003ePART 1: RATIONALE, EVIDENCE AND KEY PRINCIPLES SUPPORTING MOTOR TRAINING IN THE SCI-MT TRIAL.\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Motor Training provided during the SCI-MT Trial is directed at increasing motor function at and below the injury. This will be measured using the Total Motor Score of the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of SCI. For example, in a person with partial paralysis of the lower limbs, the Motor Training (i.e., task-specific training and strength training) will be used to improve the ability to stand or walk as well as to increase lower limb muscle strength. Of course, Motor Training as typically provided in rehabilitation can also be targeted above the injury. For example, it can be used to improve the ability of a person with paraplegia to transfer through their neurologically intact upper limbs. However, this is not the focus of the SCI-MT Trial. Rather, the focus is on improving motor function at and below the injury with the primary aim of increasing total motor scores.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Motor Training provided during the SCI-MT Trial is also directed at helping people regain the ability to move in a way that is as close as possible to that of a non-disabled person. For example, gait training will be directed at walking without aids and orthoses if possible. Similarly, upper limb training will focus on regaining the ability to reach and grasp with the kinematics and kinetics of a non-disabled person where possible. Needless to say, even small amounts of residual weakness may ultimately require some type of adaptation or compensation that alters the kinematics and kinetics of movement from that of a non-disabled person. The extent of adaptation or compensation will depend on the extent of neurological loss and may range from a slight variation to the need for extensive orthoses, aids, manual guidance, or assistance.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe SCI-MT Trial intervention will be provided in a high dosage. Dosage is determined by a combination of exercise intensity, duration, and frequency. Participants in the SCI-MT Trial will be required to exercise as hard as possible (i.e., at high intensities and with a high number of movement repetitions) for 12 hours per week over 10 weeks (i.e., for a long duration and at a high frequency). There are no stipulations about the number of sessions per week but typically the 12 hours are provided over 5 to 10 sessions of 1 to 2 hours duration each. .\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe two components of Motor Training are described below.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e1. Task-specific training\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTask-specific training has its origins in the motor relearning approach which was widely advocated in rehabilitation by Carr and Shepherd in the 1980s [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. Behavioural and neurosciences have moulded its development over the years. Animal and human studies indicate that task-specific training is a strong stimulus for neuroplasticity both at the site of injury and throughout the neural pathways responsible for purposeful movement [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR5\" citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. Task-specific training involves practice of movements that are specific to the desired functional outcome. The key principles of task-specific training are as follows.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eRepetitions\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eTask-specific training requires repetitious practice of purposeful movements. The evidence for repetitious practice is compelling, particularly in the stroke literature [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR8\" citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. Hundreds or even thousands of daily steps and upper limb movements are required to improve walking ability and arm function respectively after a stroke or SCI [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. Nonetheless, patients undergoing rehabilitation in SCI units get very little repetitious practice [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e]. This is primarily because patients do not spend the amount of time in therapy that is required for repetitious practice in addition to the many other types of interventions that they need during rehabilitation. The SCI-MT Trial aims to increase the amount of repetitious practice by adding an extra 12 hours of therapy per week for 10 weeks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eActive (not passive)\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eTask-specific training involves active voluntary muscle contractions, specific to a functional task, with the aim of learning and improving the ability to perform that task. Movement practiced in this way involves cognitive processing which is believed to drive neuroplasticity. This is supported by animal [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e] and human [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e] studies. Passive movements that are solely driven by the help of therapists, robotics, electrical stimulation, or other devices do not typically involve active muscle contractions and are unlikely to lead to such changes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. However, assistive technologies are often used in conjunction with the effort of the patient to provide a form of task-specific training. For example, locomotor training with or without body weight support (BWS) on a treadmill can be used to augment patients\u0026rsquo; attempts at walking [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. Similarly, upper or lower limb functional training using robotics has some features in common with task-specific training [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. Activity Based Therapy (ABT) is another example. Although a clear definition of ABT is currently lacking [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e], it typically focuses on high volumes of walking practice using various combinations of robotics and electrical stimulation [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR24\" citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. A key underlying principle of the SCI-MT intervention is that only active exercises will be practiced during task-specific training although attempts at movement can be assisted by robotics, electrical stimulation, or any equipment available at the training sites and as deemed appropriate by the trial therapists.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eProgression\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eTask-specific training needs to be progressed [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. This includes progressing the difficulty of part-task and whole-task practice. Walking on a treadmill is an example of whole-task practice. As the ability to walk improves, the difficulty of the training needs to be increased, with the practice expanded to different environments with increasing task complexity resulting in increased cognitive or physical demands [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. Part-task practice focuses on repetition of components of the desired task, with a biomechanical analysis underpinning the choice of the specific components to be practiced [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. Part-task practice of walking may include exercises such as stepping forwards, weight shifting in standing, or even a much simpler practice of knee and hip extension on a sliding tilt table (see www.physiotherapyexercises.com for over 1,500 exercises which include whole-task and part-task practice). Like whole-task practice, part-task practice also needs to be progressed and relies on reassembling the components back to the whole-task once the person is ready to do so [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. The ongoing progression of task-specific practice is required to the point where the ability to perform the task becomes an automatic skill [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe progression of task-specific training is critical to the SCI-MT Trial and can be done in many ways. Examples of progression include increasing the number of repetitions, changing the environmental set-up to increase the challenge, or manipulating the difficulty of the task. Physiotherapists typically select new or additional exercises every few days or weeks and constantly modify existing exercises to ensure the training is challenging and progressed. Exercise selection is highly reliant on the therapists\u0026rsquo; ongoing analysis of patients\u0026rsquo; attempts at movement, as well as therapists\u0026rsquo; decision making and clinical expertise. Appropriate progression is also reliant on careful and detailed recording of what a person does today in order to ensure they do more tomorrow. For this reason, Practice Sheets will be used for all training sessions in the SCI-MT Trial (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e for an example), where features of the exercise reflecting the intensity, set-up, and amount of practice will be recorded. For example, if a person repeatedly practices sit to stand, the following details may be recorded to direct the future progression: the height of the chair, the number of repetitions of sit to stand, the position of the feet in relation to the base of the chair, the amount of weight put through each foot, the time taken to complete a set number of repetitions, or some subjective measure of exertion such as the Borg Scale of perceived exertion.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnother important aspect of the SCI-MT Trial intervention is target orientated instructions. This helps ensure training is progressed. So, prior to commencement of any exercise the therapist and participant will together reflect on what was done in the previous session and set a new exercise target for the current session. For example, if a person could do 40 repetitions of sit to stand from a set height yesterday then perhaps today\u0026rsquo;s target will be to complete 44 repetitions from the same height. Alternatively, if a person can slide his or her thumb 40mm along a ruler whilst working towards the goal of getting the hand around a cup, perhaps next time the aim will be to slide the thumb to 42mms (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The setting of targets for every exercise makes it very clear to participants what they are trying to achieve. It provides motivation and it enables the therapist and participant to see improvement even if very small. It also ensures that training is progressed. However, it requires meticulous measuring and recording on Practice Sheets: an important aspect of the SCI-MT Trial.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eFeedback\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eAppropriate and timely feedback is integral to skill acquisition [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. Feedback provides the person with important information about their attempts at movement. It is critical for helping the person change future attempts at movement and is central to optimal motor learning. Feedback provided by therapists is known as augmented feedback. Augmented feedback is particularly important for people with SCI because of their sensory-motor impairments. Augmented feedback can be provided in the form of knowledge of results (KR) and knowledge of performance (KP) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. Knowledge of results refers to information about the outcomes of attempts at movement. Examples of KR feedback include information about the accuracy of stepping onto a target, the speed of walking or the number of sit-to-stand exercises completed. In contrast, KP refers to information about the quality of movement, or the kinetics and kinematics. Examples of KP include feedback about how well a person straightens his or her knee when standing or what a person does not do when trying to shift weight from one leg to another. Evidence suggests that both KR and KP are important for optimising motor learning during task-specific training [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR32\" citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]. Both types of feedback need to be provided at an appropriate time and in an appropriate amount of detail that matches the person\u0026rsquo;s stage of learning. So too much feedback can be just as detrimental to learning as too little feedback. Similarly, feedback provided at the wrong time can hinder attempts at movement. Therefore, an important aspect of the Motor Training provided as part of the SCI-MT Trial will be well-timed and appropriate KR and KP feedback. The use of Practice Sheets in which the therapists and participants set and review exercise targets and goals will encourage the provision of KR feedback.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eGoal driven\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eTask-specific training must be meaningful to the person. That is, it must be based on his or her own goals [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. Setting meaningful goals can increase a person\u0026rsquo;s satisfaction with the intervention and improve motivation to engage in therapy. It can also ensure that the training is specific [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e]. Motor Training based on goals that are specific and difficult is likely to produce better outcomes than training without a goal or with a non-specific easily attained goal [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. The SMART acronym is often used to facilitate the goal-setting process, prompting therapists to set goals with patients that are Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Timebound (there are several variations of the words associated with each letter) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"BlockQuote\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTask-specific training as part of the SCI-MT Trial will be based on goals set by participants in collaboration with the therapists. Two ten-week and two six-month goals will be set during the baseline assessments that form part of the formal assessment schedule of the trial. These will be set using the SMART principles of goal setting. The goals will be related to participants\u0026rsquo; activity limitations and participation restrictions and be amenable to SCI-MT intervention. Then, each week during the SCI-MT training, the therapist and participant will together identify up to four smaller goals just for the week. These weekly goals will be reviewed and progressed and will underpin the choice of task-specific exercises included in the Motor Training program.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2. Strength Training\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrength training is the second component of Motor Training. Whilst it is an important aspect of SCI-MT Trial, strength training is considered supplementary, with the priority being given to task-specific training.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere is strong evidence about the effectiveness of strength training in muscles with grade 3 or more strength [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e]. This evidence points to the importance of progressive resistance training involving high loads and low repetitions. This typically involves 2\u0026ndash;4 sets of 6\u0026ndash;12 repetition maximum muscle contractions, performed two-three times per week, over eight weeks with progression as muscles increase in strength [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e]. The most effective way to strengthen very weak muscles (grade 1 and 2) is less clear although progressive resistance training is not a viable option because it is very difficult to operationalise (high load and low repetitions). By necessity therefore, therapists tend to administer strength training for very weak muscles in the form of low loads and high repetitions. This type of training usually involves repeated contractions of the very weak muscle through the available joint range of motion to the point of muscle fatigue. Progress is achieved by changing the position of the limb and manipulating the effects of gravity and surface friction until the person can train against gravity, and then against resistance. The evidence about the effectiveness of this form of strength training for the very weak is inconclusive [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e] but included as part of the SCI-MT intervention because it is widely administered and may be effective when combined with task-specific training.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOf course, the distinction between strength training and task-specific training for the very weak can become blurred once the focus of an exercise involves high numbers of repetitious contractions. For example, knee and hip extension exercises completed on a sliding tilt table can be considered a form of strength training but can also be a form of part-task training aimed towards improving the ability to perform sit-to-stand. For the purpose of this trial, the distinction between the two is based on whether the repetitious practice involves complex movements in the context of purposeful activity or simpler exercises targeting strength training of a specific muscle group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe key features of the strength training provided as part of the Motor Training of the SCI-MT Trial are:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eProgression\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe strength training for muscles of grade 3 and 4 strength will follow the principles of progressive resistance training (high load and low repetitions), whilst the strength training for muscles of grade 1 and 2 strength will follow the principles of low load and high repetitions training. Both types of strength training will be progressed, and the participants will be encouraged to work to fatigue in every session with the difficulty of exercises increased as required. For very weak muscles, strength training will be transitioned to higher loads with lower repetitions, as well to task-specific training, as soon as possible.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eGoal driven with feedback\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eLike task-specific training, strength training needs to be meaningful to the person and based on goals that are set at the beginning of each week. In addition, setting clear targets for each exercise, so that the participants know exactly what they are trying to achieve is an important aspect of strength training. The participants will be provided with KR feedback (e.g., information about the numbers of repetitions and amount of load completed with each exercise) to optimise the effectiveness of the training.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePart 2: Operationalising And Standardising The Motor Training Provided As Part Of The Sci-mt Trial\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhilst Motor Training will be individualised to the needs of each participant, it is important that the intervention is standardised within the SCI-MT Trial as far as possible, with trial therapists adhering to the key training principles. This is being achieved by articulating the key principles and guidelines of the SCI-MT in a 3-hour online training package (delivered via Zoom) to all trial therapists. The training is compulsory and is provided to every SCI-MT site. The key principles of SCI-MT Trial are summarised in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eA summary of the key principles of SCI-MT intervention\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGeneral SCI-MT principles\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eTask-specific training\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrength training\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eFor muscles with Grade 1 and 2 strength\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eFor muscle with Grade 3 and 4 strength\u003c/b\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Twelve hours of weekly therapy will be delivered in one-to-one sessions in the therapy gym for 10 weeks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; The number and duration of sessions per week is not stipulated but typically the 12 hours per week will be provided over 5 to 10 sessions of 1 to 2 hours duration each.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Therapy will target the Total Motor Score, secondary outcomes, and the participants\u0026rsquo; goals\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Practice Sheets will be used for every session\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Exercise targets will be set for each exercise during each therapy session\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Therapy will be progressed as much as possible.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Participants will be challenged to work as hard as possible in every session.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Each session will be spent with the participant actively engaged in exercise.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; The participants will be re-assessed regularly throughout the 10 weeks.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Focus on high numbers of repetitions\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Include part-task or whole-task practice\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Provide manual assistance only if essential\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Feedback will be used to provide knowledge of performance and knowledge of results\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Clear instructions and demonstrations will be provided\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Treadmills or robotics will be used to complement training when and if appropriate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; The focus will be on high repetitions and low load\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Effects of gravity and surface friction will be manipulated to enable active muscle contraction\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Resistance/load will be increased as soon as possible\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; The strength training will be done within the context of a functional activity if possible\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Manual assistance will only be provided if essential\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; Training will follow the principles of progressive resistance training (ie., 3 x 10-12RM)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u0026bull; The strength training will be done within the context of a functional activity if possible\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition, an Intervention Manual is provided to all trial therapists alongside the training package (see Appendix 1 for a copy of the intervention manual). The Intervention Manual details the training principles of the SCI-MT Trial as well as information about the use of Practice Sheets, the type of equipment that can be used, and the staff who can deliver the 12 hours of Motor Training per week. Examples of Motor Training exercises are presented in the Intervention Manual and are categorised into common activities that can be targeted by Motor Training. The manual also includes completed Practice Sheets using four different hypothetical case studies. These demonstrate ways in which exercise set-up, intensity of training, and time spent on each exercise across a week can be documented.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe SCI-MT intervention will be delivered by a healthcare professional (e.g., Physiotherapist, Occupational Therapist, Exercise Physiologist) appropriately qualified to deliver all or some aspects of Motor Training once they have completed the compulsory training. The 12 hours per week of Motor Training will be provided to the intervention participants on a one-to-one basis by the therapists in a therapy gym. The time allocated to Motor Training will be dedicated to as much active exercise as possible, although it will also include rest, set-up, and chat. Management of fatigue will include rests as required, with encouragement to resume exercise as soon as possible. Mental practice [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e] can be used as an adjunct to training if a participant gets excessively fatigued.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe use of Practice Sheets will be at the core of delivering the SCI-MT intervention. Therapists and participants will refer to the Practice Sheets together at the beginning of each week to review previously set goals and negotiate 2\u0026ndash;4 new goals. Therapists will also use Practice Sheets to set exercise targets, and to document exercise intensity, set-up, and duration within each session. Dosage parameters documented in the Practice Sheets will be reviewed during each session, and this will be used to encourage the participants to work as hard as they can, and to progress the exercises from day to day, and week to week.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe exercise dosage delivered during the 12 hours of weekly SCI-MT Trial intervention will be documented as the \u003cem\u003eamount of time\u003c/em\u003e dedicated to active practice during each therapy session. Time alone will not capture all aspects of intensity or dosage, but it will be used in the SCI-MT Trial as a crude measure of intensity that is practical to capture. This is consistent with other studies in stroke and SCI rehabilitation [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR43\" citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. Amount of time spent on motor training during every SCI-MT session will be documented in Case Report Forms (CRF). Furthermore, time spent on each individual exercise (in addition to other training parameters reflecting intensity of training) will be recorded in the Practice Sheets, which together with the CRFs, will reflect the intensity of the SCI-MT training program.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImportantly, there will be ongoing auditing of the intervention by three trial clinical experts to ensure that the intervention is being delivered as intended. The audits will involve regular reviews of the Practice Sheets at each site, with provision of feedback and ongoing training of the trial therapists as required. In addition, the fidelity of the intervention will be examined in detail with a process evaluation that will run alongside the trial.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe SCI-MT Trial when completed will be one of the largest physiotherapy intervention trials yet to be conducted in the area of SCI. The trial addresses an important question. That is, does intensive Motor Training provided soon after injury promote neurological recovery and improve function? The results of this trial will provide the much-needed evidence for this promising intervention.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe description of the intervention is provided in as much detail at possible but one short paper can never substitute for undergraduate, postgraduate, and clinical training in the physiotherapy (and occupational therapy) management of people with SCI. There are many assumed skills that underpin the intervention. Of course, some would argue that this is a weakness of the trial. We however argue that the trial is pragmatic and needs to test the effectiveness of an intervention as it would typically be administered in the clinical setting [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e]. It therefore needs to allow for a clinician\u0026rsquo;s clinical reasoning skills. It also needs to accommodate the many different ways people are affected by SCI and their individual goals and problems. Nonetheless great effort is being directed at ensuring that those administering the intervention are appropriately skilled and trained.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere is a risk that people with recent SCI will not tolerate 12 hours of additional therapy each week so soon after injury, or they will not receive this amount of therapy for other unforeseen reasons. This will all be closely recorded and monitored. All participants will be encouraged, but not obliged, to attend therapy and some participants will no doubt opt out. Issues like this will not nullify the results or be fatal flaws because the trial is pragmatic, not explanatory [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e]. It is asking about the outcomes if we set in place staffing, policies and structures so that the spinal units can provide the maximal amount of therapy that is conceivably possible. The participants\u0026rsquo; abilities and willingness to receive this additional therapy is all part of the construct that is being tested. It is part of the real-world scenario.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn all, this paper provides the details of the Motor Training provided as part of the SCI-MT Trial. The details will increase transparency and help interpret the future results of the trial. This paper may also help those not trained in physiotherapy to appreciate some of the nuances of providing task-specific training to people with SCI. And while repetitious practice of purposeful movements is central to task-specific training, there are many other important principles that must also be followed.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis paper does not contain data.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe thank all the people with spinal cord injuries that have given their time to participate in the study to date. We also thank the many staff involved in the study for their enthusiasm, dedication, and collaboration with the delivery of the SCI MT trial intervention.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAUTHOR\u0026rsquo;S CONTRIBUTION:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSecured funding:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eLAH, JVG, VJ, CS\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOverall trial design:\u003c/em\u003eLAH, JVG, MB, CS\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIntervention development:\u003c/em\u003eLAH, JVG, MB, JC, KT\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSite management:\u003c/em\u003eAS, SR, LWC, SD, ML, EJG, JA, CVL, CL, JMS, CB, SP, DR, KO\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDevelopment of the intervention manual:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eMB, JC, KT, LAH, JVG\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eWriting of the first draft of the manuscript:\u003c/em\u003e MB, LAH, JVG, JI\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRead draft of paper:\u003c/em\u003eMB, LAH, JVG, AS, SR, LWC, SD, ML, VJ, EG, JA, CVL, CL, JMS, CB, SP, DR, JC, KT, JI, KO, CS\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eFinal edits of the manuscript:\u003c/em\u003e MB, LAH, JVG, AS, KT, JC, SR, ML, CL, CS\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFUNDING:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe trial is investigator initiated.\u0026nbsp;It is funded by a 5-year grant from NSW Ministry of Health and a 4-year grant from Wings for Life Foundation with additional financial support from the University of Sydney.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eETHICAL APPROVAL:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNo ethical approvals were required for this descriptive paper.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCOMPETING INTERESTS:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThere are no competing interests to declare.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. \u003cem\u003eBMJ \u003c/em\u003e2014; doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCarr JH, Shepherd RB. A motor learning model for stroke rehabilitation. \u003cem\u003ePhysiotherapy \u003c/em\u003e1989; 75:372-380.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCarr JH, Shepherd RB. \u003cem\u003eA motor relearning programme for stroke\u003c/em\u003e, Second edition, US edition. Heinemann Medical Books: Oxford, 1990.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurosci \u003c/em\u003e1996; 16:785-807.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKleim JA, Barbay S, Nudo RJ. Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurophysiol \u003c/em\u003e1998; 80:3321-3325.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIlha J, Meireles A, de Freitas GR, do Esp\u0026iacute;rito Santo CC, Machado-Pereira NAMM, Swarowsky A\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Overground gait training promotes functional recovery and cortical neuroplasticity in an incomplete spinal cord injury model. \u003cem\u003eLife Sciences \u003c/em\u003e2019; 232:116627-116627.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFrench B, Thomas LH, Coupe J, McMahon NE, Connell L, Harrison J\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. \u003cem\u003eCochrane library \u003c/em\u003e2016; doi:10.1002/14651858.CD14006073.pub14651853.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eValkenborghs SR, Callister R, Visser MM, Nilsson M, van Vliet P. Interventions combined with task-specific training to improve upper limb motor recovery following stroke: a systematic review with meta-analyses. \u003cem\u003ePhys Ther Rev \u003c/em\u003e2019; 24:100-117.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKlassen TD, Dukelow SP, Bayley MT, Benavente O, Hill MD, Krassioukov A\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Higher doses improve walking recovery during stroke inpatient rehabilitation. \u003cem\u003eStroke \u003c/em\u003e2020; 51:2639-2648.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLang CE, Strube MJ, Bland MD, Waddell KJ, Cherry-Allen KM, Nudo RJ\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Dose response of task-specific upper limb training in people at least 6 months poststroke: A phase II, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. \u003cem\u003eAnn Neurol \u003c/em\u003e2016; 80:342-354.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBasso DM, Lang CE. Consideration of dose and timing when applying interventions after stroke and spinal cord injury. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurol Phys Ther \u003c/em\u003e2017; 41 Suppl 3 Supplement, IV STEP Spec Iss:S24-S31.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZbogar D, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Krassioukov AV, Verrier MC. Movement repetitions in physical and occupational therapy during spinal cord injury rehabilitation. \u003cem\u003eSpinal cord \u003c/em\u003e2017; 55:172-179.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePlautz EJ, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: Role of use versus learning. \u003cem\u003eNeurobiology of learning and memory \u003c/em\u003e2000; 74:27-55.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLeech KA, Roemmich RT, Gordon J, Reisman DS, Cherry-Allen KM. Updates in motor learning: Implications for physical therapist practice and education. \u003cem\u003ePhysical therapy \u003c/em\u003e2022; 102:1-9.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBeets IAM, Mac\u0026eacute; M, Meesen RLJ, Cuypers K, Levin O, Swinnen SP. Active versus passive training of a complex bimanual task: Is prescriptive proprioceptive information sufficient for inducing motor learning? \u003cem\u003ePloS one \u003c/em\u003e2012; 7:e37687-e37687.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eField-Fote EC, Roach KE. Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. \u003cem\u003ePhysical therapy \u003c/em\u003e2011; 91:48-60.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpiess MR, Steenbrink F, Esquenazi A. Getting the best out of advanced rehabilitation technology for the lower limbs: minding motor learning principles. \u003cem\u003ePM \u0026amp; R \u003c/em\u003e2018; 10:S165-S173.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlexeeva N, Sames C, Jacobs PL, Hobday L, DiStasio MM, Mitchell SA\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Comparison of training methods to improve walking in persons with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. \u003cem\u003eJ Spinal Cord Med \u003c/em\u003e2011; 34:362-379.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBrazg G, Fahey M, Holleran CL, Connolly M, Woodward J, Hennessy PW\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Effects of training intensity on locomotor performance in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized crossover study. \u003cem\u003eNeurorehabil Neural Repair \u003c/em\u003e2017; 31:944-954.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAlcobendas-Maestro M, Esclar\u0026iacute;n-Ruz A, Casado-L\u0026oacute;pez RM, Mu\u0026ntilde;oz-Gonz\u0026aacute;lez A, P\u0026eacute;rez-Mateos G, Gonz\u0026aacute;lez-Valdiz\u0026aacute;n E\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Lokomat robotic-assisted versus overground training within 3 to 6 months of incomplete spinal cord lesion: randomized controlled trial. \u003cem\u003eNeurorehabil Neural Repair \u003c/em\u003e2012; 26:1058-1063.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEsclar\u0026iacute;n-Ruz A, Alcobendas-Maestro M, Casado-Lopez R, Perez-Mateos G, Florido-Sanchez MA, Gonzalez-Valdizan E\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e A comparison of robotic walking therapy and conventional walking therapy in individuals with upper versus lower motor neuron lesions: a randomized controlled trial. \u003cem\u003eArch Phys Med Rehabil \u003c/em\u003e2014; 95:1023-1031.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKaiser A, Chan K, Pakosh M, Musselman KE. Characteristics of activity-based therapy interventions for people living with spinal cord injury or disease across the continuum of care: a scoping review protocol. \u003cem\u003eBMJ Open \u003c/em\u003e2020; 10:doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040014.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDromerick AW, Lum PS, Hidler J. Activity-based therapies. \u003cem\u003eNeuroRx \u003c/em\u003e2006; 3:428-438.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJones ML, Harness E, Denison P, Tefertiller C, Evans N, Larson CA. Activity-based therapies in spinal cord injury: clinical focus and empirical evidence in three independent programs. \u003cem\u003eTop Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil \u003c/em\u003e2012; 18:34-42.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBehrman AL, Harkema SJ. Physical rehabilitation as an agent for recovery after spinal cord injury. \u003cem\u003ePhys Med Rehabil Clin N Am \u003c/em\u003e2007; 18:183-202.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, Carey LM. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. \u003cem\u003eOccup Ther Int \u003c/em\u003e2009; 16:175-189.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMaier M, Ballester BR, Verschure PFMJ. Principles of neurorehabilitation after stroke based on motor learning and brain plasticity mechanisms. \u003cem\u003eFront Syst Neurosci \u003c/em\u003e2019; 13:doi:10.3389/fnsys.2019.00074.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eScrivener K, Shepherd R. The importance of kinesiology, biomechanics and motor learning for movement analysis and clinical reasoning in neuromuscular physiotherapy. \u003cem\u003ePhys Ther Rev \u003c/em\u003e2022; doi:10.1080/10833196.10832022.12141529.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWinstein C, Lewthwaite R, Blanton SR, Wolf LB, Wishart L. Infusing motor learning research into neurorehabilitation practice: A historical perspective with case exemplar from the accelerated skill acquisition program. \u003cem\u003eJ Neurol Phys Ther \u003c/em\u003e2014; 38:190-200.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMagill RA, Anderson DI. \u003cem\u003eMotor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications\u003c/em\u003e, Twelfth edition. McGraw-Hill Education LLC: New York, N.Y, 2021.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCirstea CM, Ptito A, Levin MF. Feedback and cognition in arm motor skill reacquisition after stroke. \u003cem\u003eStroke \u003c/em\u003e2006; 37:1237-1242.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJie LJ, Kleynen M, Meijer K, Beurskens A, Braun S. Implicit and explicit motor learning interventions have similar effects on walking speed in people after Stroke: a randomized controlled trial. \u003cem\u003ePhysical therapy \u003c/em\u003e2021; 101:1-10.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOppici L, Dix A, Narciss S. When is knowledge of performance (KP) superior to knowledge of results (KR) in promoting motor skill learning? A systematic review. \u003cem\u003eInt Rev Sport Exerc Psychol \u003c/em\u003e2021; doi:10.1080/1750984X.1752021.1986849.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSpooren AIF, Janssen-Potten YJM, Kerckhofs E, Bongers HMH, Seelen HAM. ToCUEST: a task-oriented client-centered training module to improve upper extremity skilled performance in cervical spinal cord-injured persons. \u003cem\u003eSpinal cord \u003c/em\u003e2011; 49:1042-1048.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLevack WMM, Weatherall M, Hay‐Smith EJC, Dean SG, McPherson K, Siegert RJ\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit for adults with acquired disability participating in rehabilitation. \u003cem\u003eCochrane library \u003c/em\u003e2015; doi:10.1002/14651858.CD14009727.pub14651852.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWade DT. Goal setting in rehabilitation: an overview of what, why and how. \u003cem\u003eClin Rehabil \u003c/em\u003e2009; 23:291-295.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSwann C, Jackman PC, Lawrence A, Hawkins RM, Goddard SG, Williamson O\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e The (over)use of SMART goals for physical activity promotion: A narrative review and critique. \u003cem\u003eHealth Psychol Rev \u003c/em\u003e2022; doi:10.1080/17437199.17432021.12023608.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBye EA, Harvey LA, Gambhir A, Kataria C, Glinsky JV, Bowden JL\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Strength training for partially paralysed muscles in people with recent spinal cord injury: a within-participant randomised controlled trial. \u003cem\u003eSpinal cord \u003c/em\u003e2017; 55:460-465.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHarvey L, Fornusek C, Bowden JL, Pontifex N, Glinsky J, Middleton JW\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Electrical stimulation plus progressive resistance training for leg strength in spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial. \u003cem\u003eSpinal cord \u003c/em\u003e2010; 48:570-575.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen LW, Glinsky JV, Islam MS, Hossain M, Boswell-Ruys CL, Kataria C\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e The effects of 10,000 voluntary contractions over 8 weeks on the strength of very weak muscles in people with spinal cord injury: a randomised controlled trial. \u003cem\u003eSpinal cord \u003c/em\u003e2020; 58:857-864.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eStockley RC, Jarvis K, Boland P, Clegg AJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mental practice for the upper limb after stroke: imagined or real benefit? \u003cem\u003eArch Phys Med Rehabil \u003c/em\u003e2021; 102:1011-1027.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchneider EJ, Lannin NA, Ada L, Schmidt J. Increasing the amount of usual rehabilitation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review. \u003cem\u003eJ Physiother \u003c/em\u003e2016; 62:182-187.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: Issues for consideration. \u003cem\u003eDisability and rehabilitation \u003c/em\u003e2006; 28:823-830.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJones ML, Evans NM, Tefertiller C, Backus D, Sweatman M, Tansey K\u003cem\u003e et al.\u003c/em\u003e Activity-based therapy for recovery of walking in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: results from a randomized clinical trial. \u003cem\u003eArch Phys Med Rehabil \u003c/em\u003e2014; 95:2239-2246.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTreweek S, Zwarenstein M. Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability. \u003cem\u003eTrials \u003c/em\u003e2009; 10:37.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"spinal-cord","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"sc","sideBox":"Learn more about [Spinal Cord](http://www.nature.com/sc/)","snPcode":"41393","submissionUrl":"https://mts-sc.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"Spinal Cord","twitterHandle":"@journalsci","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2613991/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2613991/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eStudy design:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescriptive\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eObjectives\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe primary objective is to describe the intervention that will be provided in a large multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) titled: \u003cem\u003eEarly and Intensive Motor Training for people with Spinal Cord Injuries\u003c/em\u003e (the SCI-MT Trial). The secondary objective is to describe the strategies that will be used to operationalise and standardise the Motor Training provided to participants while keeping the intervention person-centred.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe paper focuses on the rationale and principles of Motor Training for people with spinal cord injuries (SCI). The description of the intervention is based on the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. Specifically, it addresses the following 6 criteria of the TIDieR checklist: why the effectiveness of Motor Training is being examined; what, how, where and when the Motor Training will be administered; and how much Motor Training will be provided.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA detailed intervention manual has been developed to help standardise the delivery of the intervention.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis paper describes the details of a complex intervention administered as part of a large randomised controlled trial. It will facilitate the subsequent interpretation of the trial results and enable the intervention to be reproduced in clinical practice and future trials.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The Early and Intensive Motor Training Trial for People with Spinal Cord Injuries: Description of the Intervention","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2023-02-24 18:23:50","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-2613991/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"revise","date":"2023-03-24T09:58:18+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2023-03-22T07:17:31+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2023-03-01T07:14:45+00:00","index":2,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2023-02-25T16:27:07+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"This content is not available.","date":"2023-02-23T00:38:55+00:00","index":1,"fulltext":"This content is not available."},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2023-02-22T19:53:30+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2023-02-22T12:05:56+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Spinal Cord","date":"2023-02-22T00:45:11+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2023-02-22T00:45:11+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"spinal-cord","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":false,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"sc","sideBox":"Learn more about [Spinal Cord](http://www.nature.com/sc/)","snPcode":"41393","submissionUrl":"https://mts-sc.nature.com/cgi-bin/main.plex","title":"Spinal Cord","twitterHandle":"@journalsci","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"ejp","reportingPortfolio":"Nature AJ","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"a924c1a7-d601-486b-b08b-b2b3a7ec4f70","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 24th, 2023","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[{"id":19451173,"name":"Health sciences/Neurology"},{"id":19451174,"name":"Health sciences/Medical research"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2023-07-21T07:33:33+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-2613991","link":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00911-4","journal":{"identity":"spinal-cord","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Spinal Cord"},"publishedOn":"2023-07-19 04:00:00","publishedOnDateReadable":"July 19th, 2023"},"versionCreatedAt":"2023-02-24 18:23:50","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1038/s41393-023-00911-4","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-023-00911-4","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-2613991","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-2613991","identity":"rs-2613991","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"_2-kVJe1T_tPrBINL-cwx","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}