Comparison of Slope Mass Ratings Classification Systems: A Review

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

This study reviews and compares five rock mass classification systems—Slope Mass Rating, Continuous Slope Mass Rating, Chinese Slope Mass Rating, Graphical Slope Mass Rating, and Landslide Hazard Evaluation Factor—for predicting rock slope failure.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16 · read from full text

This paper reviews five rock slope stability classification systems, focusing on Slope Mass Rating and related approaches (Continuous Slope Mass Rating, Chinese Slope Mass Rating, Graphical Slope Mass Rating, and Landslide Hazard Evaluation Factor), drawing comparisons across previously published reports. The study aims to determine which classification methods best predict slope failure as a mass-wasting process and as a triggered event associated with factors such as increased pore water pressure, heavy rainfall, and earthquakes, with attention to structurally controlled failure mechanisms relevant to rock slope cutting. As a review/preprint, it is not presented as an original, experimentally validated predictive model and relies on synthesis of earlier literature as its primary evidence. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Engineering rock mass classifications are vital for empirical approach to evaluate and predict engineering behavior of a rock mass. Now well established empirical relations between behavior of the rock mass and the rock mass properties with regard to specific engineering applications have become an important tool for resolving many geo-engineering issues related to mega engineering projects. Engineering classifications of Rock Masses have been applied in tunneling and underground mining with great success for many years. Some rock mass classification systems developed originally for underground, excavations were also modified and adopted for many different applications including slope stability applications. The rocky slopes in general as well as along road and rail tracks are important locales for slope analysis and stabilization. In this study five classification systems are thoroughly studied for rock stability assessment and compared on the basis of reports of various research paper published so far. The methods are Slope Mass Rating and it’s off shoots, such as Continuous Slope Mass Rating, Chinese Slope Mass Rating, Graphical Slope Mass Rating and Landslide Hazard Evaluation Factor. We have tried to work which of these method can best predict slope failure as a normal process of mass wasting and mass movement as well as triggering mechanism such as pore water pressure increase, sudden down pour, earthquakes etc. So as to work out structurally controlled failure mechanism to find suitable ways for safe rock slope cuts for road networks in hilly and mountains terrain.
Full text 12,618 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Comparison of Slope Mass Ratings Classification Systems: A Review | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Comparison of Slope Mass Ratings Classification Systems: A Review JIBRAN QADRI, M Masroor Alam, Md Rehan Sadique This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-420243/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Engineering rock mass classifications are vital for empirical approach to evaluate and predict engineering behavior of a rock mass. Now well established empirical relations between behavior of the rock mass and the rock mass properties with regard to specific engineering applications have become an important tool for resolving many geo-engineering issues related to mega engineering projects. Engineering classifications of Rock Masses have been applied in tunneling and underground mining with great success for many years. Some rock mass classification systems developed originally for underground, excavations were also modified and adopted for many different applications including slope stability applications. The rocky slopes in general as well as along road and rail tracks are important locales for slope analysis and stabilization. In this study five classification systems are thoroughly studied for rock stability assessment and compared on the basis of reports of various research paper published so far. The methods are Slope Mass Rating and it’s off shoots, such as Continuous Slope Mass Rating, Chinese Slope Mass Rating, Graphical Slope Mass Rating and Landslide Hazard Evaluation Factor. We have tried to work which of these method can best predict slope failure as a normal process of mass wasting and mass movement as well as triggering mechanism such as pore water pressure increase, sudden down pour, earthquakes etc. So as to work out structurally controlled failure mechanism to find suitable ways for safe rock slope cuts for road networks in hilly and mountains terrain. Geographic Information Systems Geology Rock Mass Classifications Slope Mass Rating Rock Slope Stability Figures Figure 1 Full Text Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-420243","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":21207131,"identity":"06258fac-b253-4e32-8021-46c287762780","order_by":0,"name":"JIBRAN QADRI","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1585-6982","institution":"Aligarh Muslim University","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"JIBRAN","middleName":"","lastName":"QADRI","suffix":""},{"id":21207132,"identity":"07dafb72-cded-47ef-8127-ced1c0bc02ae","order_by":1,"name":"M Masroor Alam","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Aligarh Muslim University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"M","middleName":"Masroor","lastName":"Alam","suffix":""},{"id":21207133,"identity":"280d4969-8820-4183-be2a-2676f3e52c2c","order_by":2,"name":"Md Rehan Sadique","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Aligarh Muslim University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Md","middleName":"Rehan","lastName":"Sadique","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2021-04-13 21:31:06","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-420243/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-420243/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":8067997,"identity":"48c1a039-a33d-4f0c-b642-4d45645d6761","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-04-15 21:59:44","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":5582725,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Figure showing different types of failure in graphic form and as real field sites. (a) Planar Failure, alternate Quartzite and Phyllite, Middle Himalaya, Nainital, Uttrakhand. (b) Wedge Failure, Sandstone Vindhyan Hills, Bindrauli, FatehpurSikri, UP. Toppling Failure, Charnockite, Western Ghats, Wayanad, Kerala.","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-420243/v1/66c5927173e9a8c54bca0f39.png"},{"id":13622192,"identity":"6e40b9d6-63fc-455f-a530-e8860885f3c7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-09-17 07:13:45","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1196791,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ComparisonofSlopeMassRatingsClassificationSystems.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-420243/v1_covered.pdf"},{"id":9717030,"identity":"3450803a-a9b2-411a-944e-f0c526ec95c9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-05-28 17:16:15","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1193211,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ComparisonofSlopeMassRatingsClassificationSystems.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-420243/v1_covered.pdf"},{"id":8068252,"identity":"2f59a354-b3d0-4d66-ac7f-b7acb0bcfb44","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-04-15 22:02:49","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1529994,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ComparisonofSlopeMassRatingsClassificationSystems.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-420243/v1_stamped.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Comparison of Slope Mass Ratings Classification Systems: A Review","fulltext":[{"header":"Full Text","content":"This preprint is available for \u003ca href='/article/rs-420243/latest.pdf' target='_blank'\u003edownload as a PDF\u003c/a\u003e."}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Rock Mass Classifications, Slope Mass Rating, Rock Slope Stability ","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-420243/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-420243/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eEngineering rock mass classifications are vital for empirical approach to evaluate and predict engineering behavior of a rock mass. Now well established empirical relations between behavior of the rock mass and the rock mass properties with regard to specific engineering applications have become an important tool for resolving many geo-engineering issues related to mega engineering projects. Engineering classifications of Rock Masses have been applied in tunneling and underground mining with great success for many years. Some rock mass classification systems developed originally for underground, excavations were also modified and adopted for many different applications including slope stability applications. The rocky slopes in general as well as along road and rail tracks are important locales for slope analysis and stabilization. In this study five classification systems are thoroughly studied for rock stability assessment and compared on the basis of reports of various research paper published so far. The methods are Slope Mass Rating and it\u0026rsquo;s off shoots, such as Continuous Slope Mass Rating, Chinese Slope Mass Rating, Graphical Slope Mass Rating and Landslide Hazard Evaluation Factor. We have tried to work which of these method can best predict slope failure as a normal process of mass wasting and mass movement as well as triggering mechanism such as pore water pressure increase, sudden down pour, earthquakes etc. So as to work out structurally controlled failure mechanism to find suitable ways for safe rock slope cuts for road networks in hilly and mountains terrain.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Comparison of Slope Mass Ratings Classification Systems: A Review","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2021-04-15 21:59:42","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-420243/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"14e6ec1d-eea3-4b55-b2c4-4f85843d30c7","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 15th, 2021","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":3654517,"name":"Geographic Information Systems"},{"id":3654518,"name":"Geology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-05-28T17:16:07+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2021-04-15 21:59:42","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-420243","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-420243","identity":"rs-420243","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"cBFmMYwuxLRRLfASyISRj","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0