Gut microbiota of dogs with cancer receiving anti-EGFR/HER2 immunization reveals potential biomarkers of patient survival

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Canine cancer remains a leading cause of death in dogs, yet advances in veterinary oncology lag behind human medicine, particularly in immunotherapy. While immune checkpoint inhibitors are just entering clinical trials in dogs, other immunotherapies, such as anti-EGFR/HER2 vaccines, have shown promise. In parallel, mounting evidence in human oncology links gut microbiota composition to immunotherapy response. However, this relationship remains unexplored in canine patients. In this pilot study, we analyzed the gut microbiome of dogs enrolled in a clinical trial of anti-EGFR/HER2 immunotherapy to identify microbial biomarkers associated with survival outcomes. Methods Rectal swab samples of 51 dogs were collected at the time of first vaccine administration (baseline microbiota) and underwent 16S rRNA gene sequencing according to standard protocols. Results Microbiome composition showed no significant differences by cancer type, sex, or breed, suggesting no inherent microbiome bias in the cohort. However, Cox regression analysis revealed 11 bacterial taxa whose abundances were significantly associated with overall survival (FDR < 0.1), independently of cancer type. Seven taxa were linked to increased mortality risk, while four were associated with prolonged survival. These associations remained significant after adjusting for confounders such as hemangiosarcoma diagnosis and advanced age. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify gut microbial signatures associated with survival in dogs undergoing cancer immunotherapy. These findings suggest that specific bacterial taxa may serve as prognostic biomarkers for immunotherapy outcomes in canine cancer, laying the groundwork for microbiota-targeted strategies to improve therapeutic efficacy in veterinary oncology.
Full text 2,048 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Canine cancer remains a leading cause of death in dogs, yet advances in veterinary oncology lag behind human medicine, particularly in immunotherapy. While immune checkpoint inhibitors are just entering clinical trials in dogs, other immunotherapies, such as anti-EGFR/HER2 vaccines, have shown promise. In parallel, mounting evidence in human oncology links gut microbiota composition to immunotherapy response. However, this relationship remains unexplored in canine patients. In this pilot study, we analyzed the gut microbiome of dogs enrolled in a clinical trial of anti-EGFR/HER2 immunotherapy to identify microbial biomarkers associated with survival outcomes.

Methods

Rectal swab samples of 51 dogs were collected at the time of first vaccine administration (baseline microbiota) and underwent 16S rRNA gene sequencing according to standard protocols.

Results

Microbiome composition showed no significant differences by cancer type, sex, or breed, suggesting no inherent microbiome bias in the cohort. However, Cox regression analysis revealed 11 bacterial taxa whose abundances were significantly associated with overall survival (FDR < 0.1), independently of cancer type. Seven taxa were linked to increased mortality risk, while four were associated with prolonged survival. These associations remained significant after adjusting for confounders such as hemangiosarcoma diagnosis and advanced age.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify gut microbial signatures associated with survival in dogs undergoing cancer immunotherapy. These findings suggest that specific bacterial taxa may serve as prognostic biomarkers for immunotherapy outcomes in canine cancer, laying the groundwork for microbiota-targeted strategies to improve therapeutic efficacy in veterinary oncology. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. List of abbreviations - HSA - Hemangiosarcoma - OSA - Osteosarcoma - OthCA - Other cancer - HR - Hazard Ratio - FDR - false discovery rate

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-07-14T06:42:26.817772+00:00