Primary neuroendocrine tumor of the portal hepatic duct in adolescence: a case report

preprint OA: closed CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

This case report describes a rare instance of a primary neuroendocrine tumor originating in the portal hepatic duct of a 17-year-old male, which was successfully treated with surgical resection.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16 · read from full text

This preprint reports a rare case of a primary neuroendocrine tumor arising in the portal hepatic duct in a 17-year-old boy, presenting with jaundice and pruritus and diagnosed preoperatively as malignant hilar bile duct tumor based on imaging and labs. After multidisciplinary evaluation, the patient underwent surgical resection of the common bile duct and common hepatic duct with gallbladder removal and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy; pathology showed a G3 NET infiltrating the bile duct wall and surrounding adipose tissue, with 19 negative lymph nodes. The authors state that preoperative diagnosis is difficult because these tumors are often confused with hilar cholangiocarcinoma and that serum markers/hormone-related symptoms are frequently absent; the principal limitation is the single-case design and lack of systematic adolescent data. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: It is not uncommon for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) to occur in the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and lungs, but NETs originating from the biliary system are relatively rare, accounting for 0.67% of gastroenteropancreatic system tumors. At present, less than 10 cases of extrahepatic biliary neuroendocrine tumors have been reported in adolescent. Case presentation: This report presents a case of a 17-year-old boy with a NET of the portal hepatic duct. Obstructive jaundice was judged from the laboratory examination and imaging findings. After the evaluation and multidisciplinary discussion, he underwent resection of the common bile duct, common hepatic duct, and gallbladder and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Pathological examination revealed a NET with the tumor invading the wall of the bile duct and surrounding adipose tissue. The patient had no NETs in any other organs or tissues. This case was a primary NET, not a metastatic tumor. Conclusion: The preoperative diagnosis of primary neuroendocrine tumor of the portal hepatic duct is difficult, and this tumor is often confused with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgical treatment is the only effective way to cure it. Once the diagnosis has been made, surgical resection should be performed as soon as possible.
Full text 48,314 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Primary neuroendocrine tumor of the portal hepatic duct in adolescence: a case report | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Case Report Primary neuroendocrine tumor of the portal hepatic duct in adolescence: a case report Fanghong Wang, Kexiang Zhu, Hui Zhang, Lei Zhang, Bo Zhang, Fang Wang, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1562034/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: It is not uncommon for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) to occur in the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and lungs, but NETs originating from the biliary system are relatively rare, accounting for 0.67% of gastroenteropancreatic system tumors. At present, less than 10 cases of extrahepatic biliary neuroendocrine tumors have been reported in adolescent. Case presentation: This report presents a case of a 17-year-old boy with a NET of the portal hepatic duct. Obstructive jaundice was judged from the laboratory examination and imaging findings. After the evaluation and multidisciplinary discussion, he underwent resection of the common bile duct, common hepatic duct, and gallbladder and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Pathological examination revealed a NET with the tumor invading the wall of the bile duct and surrounding adipose tissue. The patient had no NETs in any other organs or tissues. This case was a primary NET, not a metastatic tumor. Conclusion: The preoperative diagnosis of primary neuroendocrine tumor of the portal hepatic duct is difficult, and this tumor is often confused with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgical treatment is the only effective way to cure it. Once the diagnosis has been made, surgical resection should be performed as soon as possible. Neuroendocrine tumor Portal hepatic duct Extrahepatic biliary Case report Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Background The detection rate of NETs (3.65/100,000) has increased in recent years with improvements in medical technology and detection methods [1]. However, it has been shown that the incidence of extrahepatic biliary NETs is extremely low, accounting for approximately 0.67% of NETs in the gastroenteropancreatic system [2]. To date, only 8 cases in adolescents have also been reported. The youngest of these cases was reported by a Mexican scholar, a case of a 12-year-old girl diagnosed with an extrahepatic biliary NET. Currently, clinicians are uncertain about the epidemiology, diagnosis and prognosis of extrahepatic biliary NET as it is poorly reported. Nevertheless, surgical excision is considered to be the best treatment for this disease. Case Presentation A 17-year-old boy presented to our hospital with jaundice and pruritus lasting 1 week. Physical examination revealed no other abnormalities. Laboratory tests indicated obstructive jaundice. Liver biochemistry data revealed the following: total bilirubin, 276.1 µmol/L; direct bilirubin, 187.5 µmol/L; alanine aminotransferase, 211 U/L; aspartate aminotransferase, 222 U/L; alkaline phosphatase, 617.5 U/L; gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, 117.2 U/L; cancer antigen 19–9 (CA 19–9), 92.4 U/mL. No significant abnormalities were observed for the other tumor markers. Tests for hepatitis B virus surface antigen, hepatitis B virus surface antibody, hepatitis B virus e antigen, and hepatitis C virus antibody were negative. A contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography scan revealed the hilar bile duct to be locally enhanced, with nodule-like thickening and luminal narrowing(Fig. 1a), significant stenosis was not observed at either the left or right hepatic duct openings, and the intrahepatic bile ducts above were visibly dilated, without enlargement of the gallbladder or any readily visible nodules in the liver(Fig. 1b), considering bile duct cancer in the hilar bile duct . Computed tomography angiography showed that the origin and direction of extension of the common hepatic artery and its branches were normal, with no readily visible stenosis or dilatation. The main trunk of the portal vein was not widened, and there were no obvious filling defects in it. The opening and course of the left, middle, and right hepatic veins were normal, with no obvious signs of stenosis or dilatation(Fig. 1c) . Preoperatively, the boy was diagnosed with a malignant tumor of the hilar bile duct (Bismuth-Corlette II was considered) without metastasis to other organs or tissues. After the evaluation of multidisciplinary discussion, he underwent resection of the common bile duct and common hepatic duct with gallbladder and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Intraoperatively, we found that the tumor was located at the bifurcation of right and left hepatic ducts, and it was approximately 1.2 cm in diameter. Extrahepatic bile duct resection from the hepatic hilar to the pancreas together with cholecystectomy and lymphadenectomy resection were performed (Fig. 2a). The left and right hepatic duct margins were sent for intraoperative frozen pathology examination, and a small number of moderate to severe atypical dysplastic cells were visible in the right hepatic canal margins (Fig. 3a). For this reason, we removed 0.5 cm right liver tube, and the freezing results showed no abnormality. Then, the right anterior and right posterior branches and the left hepatic bile were integrated into a larger bile duct opening, and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed with the jejunum approximately 15 cm downstream of the ligament of Treitz (Fig. 2b). Histologic examination showed low differentiation of the neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of the hilar bile duct (G3) (Fig. 3b). The tumor infiltrates the bile duct wall and involves the surrounding fibrous adipose tissue. We tested 19 lymph nodes, all of which were negative. Immunohistochemistry indicated that CD31 (intravascular tumor plugs were detected), CD56(+), CEA(−), CK19(+), D2-40 (no tumor plugs were detected in the lymphatic vessels), Desmin(−), Ki67(20%), S100 (nerve invasion were be detected), Syn(+), and CgA(−). Postoperative recovery was regular. The patient was placed on a fluid diet on the 3rd postoperative day. No complications were observed, and the patient was discharged on the 8th postoperative day. NETs are unique tumors with typical histological, clinical, and biological characteristics. They include multipotent cells that can secrete large amounts of hormonal substances and vasoactive peptides. These include gastrin, somatostatin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, insulin, and glucagon [3,4]. However, extrahepatic biliary NETs rarely secrete hormonal substances or vasoactive peptides that cause the corresponding clinical symptoms. NETs are caused by Kulchitsky cells in the Lieberkuhn crypt, which are visible in the gastrointestinal tract but very rare in the biliary system, which explains the low incidence of NETs of the extrahepatic bile duct. Because extrahepatic biliary NETs are rare and there is a lack of large case studies reported, Michalopoulos et al. performed a retrospective study in which they reported approximately 38 cases of extrahepatic biliary NETs from 1961 to 2013 in patients with a median age of 47 years (range 6–79 years) and a female predominance (61.5%) [5]. To date, only 8 cases in adolescents have also been reported. The youngest of these cases was reported by a Mexican scholar, a case of a 12-year-old girl diagnosed with an extrahepatic biliary NET. She underwent resection of the common bile duct, cholecystectomy and end to side Roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy, and portal lymphadenectomy [6]. NETs of the extrahepatic bile ducts can produce clinical symptoms, but these symptoms are usually related to obstruction of the bile ducts due to the increasing size of the tumor and compression of the surrounding tissues. They are rarely due to hormones or vasoactive intestinal peptides secreted. The most common clinical symptoms of NETs of extrahepatic bile are jaundice (60.3%) and pruritus (19.2%). Hormone and vasoactive peptide-associated symptoms were only reported in 9% of cases [3]. It has been reported that NETs of the extrahepatic biliary occur in the hilar bile duct (11.5%), common bile duct (17.9%), cystic duct (16.7%), and distal common bile duct (19.2%), and the surgical approach to tumors at different sites varies [7]. In general, the surgical procedure for NETs of extrahepatic biliary is basically the same as that for adenocarcinoma of extrahepatic bile duct. In our case, the tumor was located at the bifurcation of right and left hepatic ducts, and postoperative pathological examination showed that the tumor had infiltrated the bile duct wall and involved the surrounding adipose tissue. Fortunately, we performed complete resection of the tumor and resection of the surrounding fibrous adipose tissue and lymphatic tissues, which theoretically achieved a good curative effect. The imaging presentation of NETs of extrahepatic biliary is similar to that of cholangiocarcinoma, and accurate preoperative diagnosis is difficult due to the lack of detectable serum markers and clinical hormone-related symptoms in patients. One study showed that only 4 of 87 patients were diagnosed with neuroendocrine or extrahepatic biliary tumors before surgery, and 2 of them had significantly elevated serum 5-hydroxytryptamine levels. In the other two patients, intraoperative biopsies were performed for pathological diagnosis during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [8]. Currently, surgery is the most effective treatment for extrahepatic biliary NETs. Palliative treatment including systemic chemotherapy, growth inhibitor analogs, targeted therapy, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy may also be able to control the progression of the disease to some extent, but most of these treatments are applicable to NETs of the gastroenteropancreatic system and not to extrahepatic biliary NETs [9]. After all, NETs of the extrahepatic bile duct are rare. Only a few cases have been reported, and there is a dearth of systematic and large samples of data on the effects of clinical drug therapy. Conclusions Extrahepatic biliary NETs are relatively rare, and surgical treatment is the most effective treatment. Currently, fewer than 10 cases of extrahepatic biliary NETs have been reported in adolescents. We report a case in a 17-year-old boy. In our case, the primary tumor was surgically removed, we also report the patient’s pathological findings and his postoperative recovery, and we will continue to follow the patient’s condition long term. Discussion NETs are unique tumors with typical histological, clinical, and biological characteristics. They include multipotent cells that can secrete large amounts of hormonal substances and vasoactive peptides. These include gastrin, somatostatin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, insulin, and glucagon [ 3 , 4 ]. However, extrahepatic biliary NETs rarely secrete hormonal substances or vasoactive peptides that cause the corresponding clinical symptoms. NETs are caused by Kulchitsky cells in the Lieberkuhn crypt, which are visible in the gastrointestinal tract but very rare in the biliary system, which explains the low incidence of NETs of the extrahepatic bile duct. Because extrahepatic biliary NETs are rare and there is a lack of large case studies reported, Michalopoulos et al. performed a retrospective study in which they reported approximately 38 cases of extrahepatic biliary NETs from 1961 to 2013 in patients with a median age of 47 years (range 6–79 years) and a female predominance (61.5%) [ 5 ]. To date, only 8 cases in adolescents have also been reported. The youngest of these cases was reported by a Mexican scholar, a case of a 12-year-old girl diagnosed with an extrahepatic biliary NET. She underwent resection of the common bile duct, cholecystectomy and end to side Roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy, and portal lymphadenectomy [ 6 ]. NETs of the extrahepatic bile ducts can produce clinical symptoms, but these symptoms are usually related to obstruction of the bile ducts due to the increasing size of the tumor and compression of the surrounding tissues. They are rarely due to hormones or vasoactive intestinal peptides secreted. The most common clinical symptoms of NETs of extrahepatic bile are jaundice (60.3%) and pruritus (19.2%). Hormone and vasoactive peptide-associated symptoms were only reported in 9% of cases [ 3 ]. It has been reported that NETs of the extrahepatic biliary occur in the hilar bile duct (11.5%), common bile duct (17.9%), cystic duct (16.7%), and distal common bile duct (19.2%), and the surgical approach to tumors at different sites varies [ 7 ]. In general, the surgical procedure for NETs of extrahepatic biliary is basically the same as that for adenocarcinoma of extrahepatic bile duct. In our case, the tumor was located at the bifurcation of right and left hepatic ducts, and postoperative pathological examination showed that the tumor had infiltrated the bile duct wall and involved the surrounding adipose tissue. Fortunately, we performed complete resection of the tumor and resection of the surrounding fibrous adipose tissue and lymphatic tissues, which theoretically achieved a good curative effect. The imaging presentation of NETs of extrahepatic biliary is similar to that of cholangiocarcinoma, and accurate preoperative diagnosis is difficult due to the lack of detectable serum markers and clinical hormone-related symptoms in patients. One study showed that only 4 of 87 patients were diagnosed with neuroendocrine or extrahepatic biliary tumors before surgery, and 2 of them had significantly elevated serum 5-hydroxytryptamine levels. In the other two patients, intraoperative biopsies were performed for pathological diagnosis during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ 8 ]. Currently, surgery is the most effective treatment for extrahepatic biliary NETs. Palliative treatment including systemic chemotherapy, growth inhibitor analogs, targeted therapy, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy may also be able to control the progression of the disease to some extent, but most of these treatments are applicable to NETs of the gastroenteropancreatic system and not to extrahepatic biliary NETs [ 9 ]. After all, NETs of the extrahepatic bile duct are rare. Only a few cases have been reported, and there is a dearth of systematic and large samples of data on the effects of clinical drug therapy. Abbreviations NETs: Neuroendocrine tumors. Declarations Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the reviewers for their helpful comments on this paper. Authors’ contributions FHW participated in the acquisition of clinical data and drafted the manuscript. XL and KXZ revised the manuscript. FW carried out the pathological examination and interpretation. HZ,LZ,WCZ and BZ participated in the surgery as well as in the pre-operative imaging analysis. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Funding This study received funding from the Science Foundation of Gansu Province/Exploring the effect of ruxolitinib on the proliferation and apoptosis of gallbladder cancer cells based on JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway (No. 21JR7RA359) and In-Hospital Fund of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University (No.Ldyyyn2021-28). Availability of data and materials All data generated during this study are included in this published article. Ethics approval and consent to participate Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editor of this journal Consent for publication Written informed consent for publication was obtained from the patient’s relatives. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. References Lawrence B, Gustafsson BI, Chan A, Svejda B, Kidd M, Modlin IM. The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2011;40(1):1-8. Stephanie Radu, Alice W. Fung, Skye C. Mayo.Primary Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tract. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery . 2021;25:3007-9. Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer. 2013;97:934-59. Nickos M, Theodossis SP, Georgia K, Ioannis P, Spiros TP , Ioannis K. Neuroendocrine tumors of extrahepatic biliary tract, Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2014; 20:765-75. Michalopoulos N, Papavramidis TS, Karayannopoulou G, Pliakos I, Papavramidis ST, Kanellos I. Neuroendocrine tumors of extrahepatic biliary tract. Pathol Oncol Res. 2014;20:765-75. Ricardo Fernández-Ferreira, Emilio Medina-Ceballos, Pamela Denisse Soberanis-piña, Emilio Conde-Flores , Andrés Mauricio Arroyave-Ramírez, Carlos Daniel Izquierdo-Tolosa , Daniel Motola-Kuba, Jose Manuel Ruiz-Morales, Rita Dorantes-Herediaet. Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Common Bile Duct: Case Report. Case Rep Oncol. 2021;14:1785-91. Zhang L, Wan D, Bao L, Chen Q, Xie H, Xu S, Lin S. Neuroendocrine carcinoma in the extrahepatic biliary tract: a case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e11487. Raspanti C, Falco N, Silvestri V, Rotolo G, Bonventre S, Gulotta G. Neuroendocrine tumor of the common bile duct: case report. G Chir. 2016;37(6):275–80. Walter T, Brixi-Benmansour H, Lombard-Bohas C, Cadiot G.New treatment strategies in advanced neuroendocrine tumours. Dig. Liver. Dis. 2012;(44):95-105. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-1562034","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Case Report","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":99736633,"identity":"3d5a737f-8bc2-457e-a8bb-4a8709c57aa8","order_by":0,"name":"Fanghong Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The First Hospital of Lanzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Fanghong","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":99736635,"identity":"d44bb674-1d43-456b-9df3-3b765b1b8567","order_by":1,"name":"Kexiang Zhu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The First Hospital of Lanzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kexiang","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhu","suffix":""},{"id":99736637,"identity":"3743a8ce-6b4c-47ec-866a-ccfe5c4f6975","order_by":2,"name":"Hui Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The First Hospital of Lanzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hui","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":99736639,"identity":"102901b2-58e7-437c-bcb3-10602aadd27f","order_by":3,"name":"Lei Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The First Hospital of Lanzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lei","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":99736641,"identity":"ca21101d-7d4a-42a2-8a94-d0a1f6809efc","order_by":4,"name":"Bo Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The First Hospital of Lanzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bo","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":99736642,"identity":"31514cd0-4c9c-4d95-8d5b-57dddb111277","order_by":5,"name":"Fang Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The First Hospital of Lanzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Fang","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":99736643,"identity":"138485e5-97fc-4629-a9d8-fe663daa134f","order_by":6,"name":"Wence Zhou","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The First Hospital of Lanzhou University","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Wence","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhou","suffix":""},{"id":99736644,"identity":"aa94234a-33ca-4270-8e52-78dcbcd9ddf7","order_by":7,"name":"Xun Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The First Hospital of Lanzhou University","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xun","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2022-04-15 15:14:10","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1562034/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1562034/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":21079286,"identity":"ec7aa05b-6ce0-418d-8be2-4777dab107d7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-04 17:54:39","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":334862,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eContrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography scan showed the hilar bile duct to be locally enhanced, with nodule-like thickening and luminal narrowing(a). The intrahepatic bile ducts above were obviously dilated,no significant stenosis was observed at the left or right hepatic duct openings, and(b).\u0026nbsp;Computed tomography angiography showed that the origin and direction of extension of the common hepatic artery and its branches were normal, with no obvious stenosis or dilatation(c).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1562034/v1/29952d92496b94d27701da0d.png"},{"id":21079285,"identity":"f7e49731-ca2a-4804-879a-5afb5d192f85","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-04 17:54:39","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":633309,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eExtrahepatic bile duct resection from the hepatic hilar to the pancreas together with cholecystectomy and lymphadenectomy resection(a). Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed(b).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1562034/v1/491d83dd4226fc00f5bdf3fe.png"},{"id":21079287,"identity":"0519ed05-fa7a-452d-8e0b-561726c2532d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-04 17:54:40","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":620720,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eFrozen pathology examinations indicated that a small number of moderate to severe atypical dysplastic cells were visible in the right hepatic canal margins(a), (hematoxylin and eosin, ×200). Histologic examination showed low differentiation in neuroendocrine tumors(b),(hematoxylin and eosin, ×400).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"Figure3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1562034/v1/b9495d2a48a8222c672ced2b.png"},{"id":21079289,"identity":"34cbf522-1214-43b7-8396-312fc2b7bf04","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-04 17:54:47","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1763680,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1562034/v1/77cdb810-850d-48f4-919e-93982acb6e96.pdf"},{"id":21079288,"identity":"4da08247-2e46-45aa-9986-8af5d8478b0e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2022-05-04 17:54:42","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1531912,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-1562034/v1/ffd0296a-1523-4225-9d77-713ffa47b541.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003ePrimary neuroendocrine tumor of the portal hepatic duct in adolescence: a case report\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Background","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe detection rate of NETs (3.65/100,000) has increased in recent years with improvements in medical technology and detection methods [1]. However, it has been shown that the incidence of extrahepatic biliary NETs is extremely low, accounting for approximately 0.67% of NETs in the gastroenteropancreatic system [2]. To date, only 8 cases in adolescents have also been reported. The youngest of these cases was reported by a Mexican scholar, a case of a 12-year-old girl diagnosed with an extrahepatic biliary NET. Currently, clinicians are uncertain about the epidemiology, diagnosis and prognosis of extrahepatic biliary NET as it is poorly reported. Nevertheless, surgical excision is considered to be the best treatment for this disease.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Case Presentation","content":"\u003cp\u003eA 17-year-old boy presented to our hospital with jaundice and pruritus lasting 1 week. Physical examination revealed no other abnormalities. Laboratory tests indicated obstructive jaundice. Liver biochemistry data revealed the following: total bilirubin, 276.1 \u0026micro;mol/L; direct bilirubin, 187.5 \u0026micro;mol/L; alanine aminotransferase, 211 U/L; aspartate aminotransferase, 222 U/L; alkaline phosphatase, 617.5 U/L; gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, 117.2 U/L; cancer antigen 19\u0026ndash;9 (CA 19\u0026ndash;9), 92.4 U/mL. No significant abnormalities were observed for the other tumor markers. Tests for hepatitis B virus surface antigen, hepatitis B virus surface antibody, hepatitis B virus e antigen, and hepatitis C virus antibody were negative. A contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography scan revealed the hilar bile duct to be locally enhanced, with nodule-like thickening and luminal narrowing(Fig. 1a), significant stenosis was not observed at either the left or right hepatic duct openings, and the intrahepatic bile ducts above were visibly dilated, without enlargement of the gallbladder or any readily visible nodules in the liver(Fig. 1b), considering bile duct cancer in the hilar bile duct . Computed tomography angiography showed that the origin and direction of extension of the common hepatic artery and its branches were normal, with no readily visible stenosis or dilatation. The main trunk of the portal vein was not widened, and there were no obvious filling defects in it. The opening and course of the left, middle, and right hepatic veins were normal, with no obvious signs of stenosis or dilatation(Fig. 1c) .\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePreoperatively, the boy was diagnosed with a malignant tumor of the hilar bile duct (Bismuth-Corlette II was considered) without metastasis to other organs or tissues. After the evaluation of multidisciplinary discussion, he underwent resection of the common bile duct and common hepatic duct with gallbladder and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Intraoperatively, we found that the tumor was located at the bifurcation of right and left hepatic ducts, and it was approximately 1.2 cm in diameter. Extrahepatic bile duct resection from the hepatic hilar to the pancreas together with cholecystectomy and lymphadenectomy resection were performed (Fig. 2a). The left and right hepatic duct margins were sent for intraoperative frozen pathology examination, and a small number of moderate to severe atypical dysplastic cells were visible in the right hepatic canal margins (Fig. 3a). For this reason, we removed 0.5 cm right liver tube, and the freezing results showed no abnormality. Then, the right anterior and right posterior branches and the left hepatic bile were integrated into a larger bile duct opening, and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed with the jejunum approximately 15 cm downstream of the ligament of Treitz (Fig. 2b). Histologic examination showed low differentiation of the neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of the hilar bile duct (G3) (Fig. 3b). The tumor infiltrates the bile duct wall and involves the surrounding fibrous adipose tissue. We tested 19 lymph nodes, all of which were negative. Immunohistochemistry indicated that CD31 (intravascular tumor plugs were detected), CD56(+), CEA(\u0026minus;), CK19(+), D2-40 (no tumor plugs were detected in the lymphatic vessels), Desmin(\u0026minus;), Ki67(20%), S100 (nerve invasion were be detected), Syn(+), and CgA(\u0026minus;). Postoperative recovery was regular. The patient was placed on a fluid diet on the 3rd postoperative day. No complications were observed, and the patient was discharged on the 8th postoperative day.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNETs are unique tumors with typical histological, clinical, and biological characteristics. They include multipotent cells that can secrete large amounts of hormonal substances and vasoactive peptides. These include gastrin, somatostatin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, insulin, and glucagon [3,4]. However, extrahepatic biliary NETs rarely secrete hormonal substances or vasoactive peptides that cause the corresponding clinical symptoms. NETs are caused by Kulchitsky cells in the Lieberkuhn crypt, which are visible in the gastrointestinal tract but very rare in the biliary system, which explains the low incidence of NETs of the extrahepatic bile duct.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBecause extrahepatic biliary NETs are rare and there is a lack of\u0026nbsp;large case studies reported, Michalopoulos et al. performed a retrospective study in which they reported approximately 38 cases of extrahepatic biliary NETs from 1961 to 2013 in patients with a median age of 47 years (range 6\u0026ndash;79 years) and a female predominance (61.5%) [5]. To date, only 8 cases in adolescents have also been reported. The youngest of these cases was reported by a Mexican scholar, a case of a 12-year-old girl diagnosed with an extrahepatic biliary NET. She underwent resection of the common bile duct, cholecystectomy and end to side Roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy, and portal lymphadenectomy [6]. NETs of the extrahepatic bile ducts can produce clinical symptoms, but these symptoms are usually related to obstruction of the bile ducts due to the increasing size of the tumor and compression of the surrounding tissues. They are rarely due to hormones or vasoactive intestinal peptides secreted. The most common clinical symptoms of NETs of extrahepatic bile are jaundice (60.3%) and pruritus (19.2%). Hormone and vasoactive peptide-associated symptoms were only reported in 9% of cases [3].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIt has been reported that NETs of the extrahepatic biliary occur in the hilar bile duct (11.5%), common bile duct (17.9%), cystic duct (16.7%), and distal common bile duct (19.2%), and the surgical approach to tumors at different sites varies [7]. In general, the surgical procedure for NETs of extrahepatic biliary is basically the same as that for adenocarcinoma of extrahepatic bile duct. In our case, the tumor was located at the bifurcation of right and left hepatic ducts, and postoperative pathological examination showed that the tumor had infiltrated the bile duct wall and involved the surrounding adipose tissue. Fortunately, we performed complete resection of the tumor and resection of the surrounding fibrous adipose tissue and lymphatic tissues, which theoretically achieved a good curative effect.\u0026nbsp;The imaging presentation of NETs of extrahepatic biliary is similar to that of cholangiocarcinoma, and accurate preoperative diagnosis is difficult due to the lack of detectable serum markers and clinical hormone-related symptoms in patients. One study showed that only 4 of 87 patients were diagnosed with neuroendocrine or extrahepatic biliary tumors before surgery, and 2 of them had significantly elevated serum 5-hydroxytryptamine levels. In the other two patients, intraoperative biopsies were performed for pathological diagnosis during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [8].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCurrently, surgery is the most effective treatment for extrahepatic biliary NETs. Palliative treatment including systemic chemotherapy, growth inhibitor analogs, targeted therapy, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy may also be able to control the progression of the disease to some extent, but most of these treatments are applicable to NETs of the gastroenteropancreatic system and not to extrahepatic biliary NETs [9]. After all, NETs of the extrahepatic bile duct are rare. Only a few cases have been reported, and there is a dearth of systematic and large samples of data on the effects of clinical drug therapy.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eExtrahepatic biliary NETs are relatively rare, and surgical treatment is the most effective treatment.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;Currently, fewer than 10 cases of extrahepatic biliary NETs have been reported in adolescents. We report a case in a 17-year-old boy.\u0026nbsp;In our case, the primary tumor was surgically removed, we also report the patient\u0026rsquo;s pathological findings and his postoperative recovery, and we will continue to follow the patient\u0026rsquo;s condition long term.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eNETs are unique tumors with typical histological, clinical, and biological characteristics. They include multipotent cells that can secrete large amounts of hormonal substances and vasoactive peptides. These include gastrin, somatostatin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, insulin, and glucagon [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e]. However, extrahepatic biliary NETs rarely secrete hormonal substances or vasoactive peptides that cause the corresponding clinical symptoms. NETs are caused by Kulchitsky cells in the Lieberkuhn crypt, which are visible in the gastrointestinal tract but very rare in the biliary system, which explains the low incidence of NETs of the extrahepatic bile duct.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBecause extrahepatic biliary NETs are rare and there is a lack of large case studies reported, Michalopoulos et al. performed a retrospective study in which they reported approximately 38 cases of extrahepatic biliary NETs from 1961 to 2013 in patients with a median age of 47 years (range 6\u0026ndash;79 years) and a female predominance (61.5%) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. To date, only 8 cases in adolescents have also been reported. The youngest of these cases was reported by a Mexican scholar, a case of a 12-year-old girl diagnosed with an extrahepatic biliary NET. She underwent resection of the common bile duct, cholecystectomy and end to side Roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy, and portal lymphadenectomy [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. NETs of the extrahepatic bile ducts can produce clinical symptoms, but these symptoms are usually related to obstruction of the bile ducts due to the increasing size of the tumor and compression of the surrounding tissues. They are rarely due to hormones or vasoactive intestinal peptides secreted. The most common clinical symptoms of NETs of extrahepatic bile are jaundice (60.3%) and pruritus (19.2%). Hormone and vasoactive peptide-associated symptoms were only reported in 9% of cases [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIt has been reported that NETs of the extrahepatic biliary occur in the hilar bile duct (11.5%), common bile duct (17.9%), cystic duct (16.7%), and distal common bile duct (19.2%), and the surgical approach to tumors at different sites varies [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e]. In general, the surgical procedure for NETs of extrahepatic biliary is basically the same as that for adenocarcinoma of extrahepatic bile duct. In our case, the tumor was located at the bifurcation of right and left hepatic ducts, and postoperative pathological examination showed that the tumor had infiltrated the bile duct wall and involved the surrounding adipose tissue. Fortunately, we performed complete resection of the tumor and resection of the surrounding fibrous adipose tissue and lymphatic tissues, which theoretically achieved a good curative effect. The imaging presentation of NETs of extrahepatic biliary is similar to that of cholangiocarcinoma, and accurate preoperative diagnosis is difficult due to the lack of detectable serum markers and clinical hormone-related symptoms in patients. One study showed that only 4 of 87 patients were diagnosed with neuroendocrine or extrahepatic biliary tumors before surgery, and 2 of them had significantly elevated serum 5-hydroxytryptamine levels. In the other two patients, intraoperative biopsies were performed for pathological diagnosis during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCurrently, surgery is the most effective treatment for extrahepatic biliary NETs. Palliative treatment including systemic chemotherapy, growth inhibitor analogs, targeted therapy, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy may also be able to control the progression of the disease to some extent, but most of these treatments are applicable to NETs of the gastroenteropancreatic system and not to extrahepatic biliary NETs [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. After all, NETs of the extrahepatic bile duct are rare. Only a few cases have been reported, and there is a dearth of systematic and large samples of data on the effects of clinical drug therapy.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cp\u003eNETs: Neuroendocrine tumors.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe would like to acknowledge the reviewers for their helpful comments on this paper.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026rsquo; contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFHW\u0026nbsp;participated in the acquisition of clinical data and drafted the manuscript.\u0026nbsp;XL\u0026nbsp;and\u0026nbsp;KXZ\u0026nbsp;revised the manuscript.\u0026nbsp;FW\u0026nbsp;carried out\u0026nbsp;the pathological examination and interpretation.\u0026nbsp;HZ,LZ,WCZ and BZ participated in the surgery as well as in the pre-operative imaging analysis.\u0026nbsp;All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study received funding from the Science Foundation of Gansu Province/Exploring the effect of ruxolitinib on the proliferation and apoptosis of gallbladder cancer cells based on JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway (No. 21JR7RA359) and In-Hospital Fund of the First\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;Hospital of Lanzhou University (No.Ldyyyn2021-28).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll data generated during this study are included in this published article.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editor of this journal Consent for publication\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWritten informed consent for publication was obtained from the patient\u0026rsquo;s relatives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLawrence B, Gustafsson BI, Chan A, Svejda B, Kidd M, Modlin IM. The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2011;40(1):1-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eStephanie Radu,\u0026nbsp;Alice W. Fung,\u0026nbsp;Skye C. Mayo.Primary Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Extrahepatic Biliary Tract. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery . 2021;25:3007-9.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eModlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer. 2013;97:934-59.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNickos M, Theodossis SP, Georgia K, Ioannis P, Spiros TP , Ioannis K. Neuroendocrine tumors of extrahepatic biliary tract, Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2014; 20:765-75.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMichalopoulos N, Papavramidis TS, Karayannopoulou G, Pliakos I, Papavramidis ST, Kanellos I. Neuroendocrine tumors of extrahepatic biliary tract. Pathol Oncol Res.\u0026nbsp;2014;20:765-75.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRicardo Fern\u0026aacute;ndez-Ferreira, Emilio Medina-Ceballos, Pamela Denisse Soberanis-pi\u0026ntilde;a, Emilio Conde-Flores , Andr\u0026eacute;s Mauricio Arroyave-Ram\u0026iacute;rez, Carlos Daniel Izquierdo-Tolosa , Daniel Motola-Kuba, Jose Manuel Ruiz-Morales, Rita Dorantes-Herediaet. Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Common Bile Duct: Case Report. Case Rep Oncol.\u0026nbsp;2021;14:1785-91.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZhang L, Wan D, Bao L, Chen Q, Xie H, Xu S, Lin S. Neuroendocrine carcinoma in the extrahepatic biliary tract: a case report and literature review. Medicine\u0026nbsp;(Baltimore). 2018;97:e11487.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eRaspanti C, Falco N, Silvestri V, Rotolo G, Bonventre S, Gulotta G. Neuroendocrine tumor of the common bile duct: case report. G Chir. 2016;37(6):275\u0026ndash;80.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWalter T, Brixi-Benmansour H, Lombard-Bohas C, Cadiot G.New treatment strategies in advanced neuroendocrine tumours. Dig. Liver. Dis. 2012;(44):95-105.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Neuroendocrine tumor, Portal hepatic duct, Extrahepatic biliary, Case report","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1562034/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1562034/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eBackground: \u003c/strong\u003eIt is not uncommon for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) to occur in the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and lungs, but NETs originating from the biliary system are relatively rare, accounting for 0.67% of gastroenteropancreatic system tumors. At present, less than 10 cases of extrahepatic biliary neuroendocrine tumors have been reported in adolescent. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCase\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cstrong\u003epresentation: \u003c/strong\u003eThis report presents a case of a 17-year-old boy with a NET of the portal hepatic duct. Obstructive jaundice was judged from the laboratory examination and imaging findings. After the evaluation and multidisciplinary discussion, he underwent resection of the common bile duct, common hepatic duct, and gallbladder and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Pathological examination revealed a NET with the tumor invading the wall of the bile duct and surrounding adipose tissue. The patient had no NETs in any other organs or tissues. This case was a primary NET, not a metastatic tumor. \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion: \u003c/strong\u003eThe preoperative diagnosis of primary neuroendocrine tumor of the portal hepatic duct is difficult, and this tumor is often confused with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgical treatment is the only effective way to cure it. Once the diagnosis has been made, surgical resection should be performed as soon as possible.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Primary neuroendocrine tumor of the portal hepatic duct in adolescence: a case report","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2022-05-04 17:54:38","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1562034/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"efeebd5a-2e2b-4a7b-83a8-826579fd6fc3","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 4th, 2022","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2022-05-04T17:54:39+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2022-05-04 17:54:38","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-1562034","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-1562034","identity":"rs-1562034","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"cBFmMYwuxLRRLfASyISRj","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0