Beware of the uterine contractions: a mimicker of adenomyosis and of more weird things.

article OA: green CC0

Abstract

Poster: ECR 2011 / C-2319 / Beware of the uterine contractions: a mimicker of adenomyosis and of more weird things. by: T. bitti, G. Demurtas, S. SECCI, G. M. ARGIOLAS; cagliari/IT
Full text 2,570 characters · extracted from oa-html · 4 sections · click to expand

Keywords

Abdomen, Genital / Reproductive system female, Anatomy, MR Authors: G. T. Bitti, G. Demurtas, S. SECCI, G. M. ARGIOLAS; cagliari/IT DOI: 10.1594/ecr2011/C-2319 Learning objectives The aim of this work is to show the various appearances of uterine contraction on MR imaging and show how this can be distinguished from fibroid, adenomyosis and uterine malignancy.

Background

MR is widely used for the evaluation of uterine and adnexal diseases. It is well known that sustained uterine contractions are the cause for potential pitfalls on T2 sequences (1,2). We retrospectively analized the MR examinations performed in our institution for gynecological diseases in the last two years and analized the different appearance of myometrial contraction on both T2 and postcontrast images. Myometrial contraction has been described as a focal area of transitory thickening of uterine wall with reduced signal intensity on FSET2 sequences; it... Imaging findings OR Procedure details MR studies were performed on a 1,5 MR unit with small FOV (20 cm), 3-5 mm FSET2 acquired on sagittal, axial and coronal planes, 5 mm axial FSE T1 with and without fat saturation and dynamicsagittal post-contrast 3D SPGR T1. Imaging findings are dysplayed on images.

Conclusion

The patterns of uterine contraction are variable for signal intensity and site of involvement, which can vary from inner third (junctional zone) to middle third and full thickness. Being aware of these variations is important to avoid pitfalls. The best way to confirm that an abnormality in the uterus is due to contraction is to proof its transitory nature in different sequences. Personal Information Thank you for your interest in this poster. If you need more informations please e-mail [email protected]

References

§ Masui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S, Nakayama S, Nozaki A, Kabasawa H, Ito T, Sakahara H. Radiology. 2001 Oct;221(1):75-85.PMID: 11568324 Changes in myometrial and junctional zone thickness and signal intensity: demonstration with kinematic T2-weighted MR imaging. §Masui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S, Shimizu S, Nozaki A, Sakahara H. Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):345-52. Pseudolesions related to uterine contraction: characterization with multiphase-multisection T2-weighted MR imaging. § Togashi K, Kawakami S, Kimura I, Asato R, Okumura R, Fukuoka M, Mori T, J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993 Nov-Dec;3(6):889-93 Uterine...

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK