Are Gain Scores Really a “Treacherous Quicksand”? An Empirical Comparison Between Gain Score Methods and ANCOVA
preprint
OA: closed
CC-BY-4.0
Abstract
Gain score methods have long been criticized and avoided in educational and psychological literature and research. Using a novel research design that allows researchers to know the true causal effect in the presence of real, not simulated, confounding, this article provides empirical evidence that gain score methods can outperform ANCOVA in a real educational setting. Prevalent uninformed criticism on gain score methods should be discredited.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-22T02:00:06.705733+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0