Re: A comparison of the cost–utility of ultrasound‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound and hysterectomy for adenomyosis: a retrospective study: Is the cost‐effectiveness of HIFU for adenomyosis and fibroids feasible?

Ou KY, Kae‐Yng Ou, Kae-Yng Ou, Jeng CJ, Cherng-Jye Jeng, Cherng‐Jye Jeng, Cheng-Yu Long, Cheng‐Yu Long, Chuang L, Linus Chuang
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2018 · vol. 125(6) , pp. 763–764 · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15115 · PMID:29405542 · W2793461617
letter OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-10 ⓘ

This retrospective study compared the cost-utility of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and hysterectomy for adenomyosis, assessing the feasibility of HIFU's cost-effectiveness for both adenomyosis and fibroids.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Leiomyoma Adenomyosis Cost-Benefit Analysis Female Humans Hysterectomy Retrospective Studies

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

Cited by (1)

References (4)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-29T06:12:09.280863+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:20:01.354358+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK